The present disclosure provides apparatus and methods for a device for detecting tissue damage through measurement of Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM). The present disclosure further provides apparatus and methods for a device for detecting tissue damage through measurement of SEM, where the device includes a printed circuit board (PCB) assembled into a molded frame.
A printed circuit board (PCB) is employed in medical devices as a flat base that physically supports and electronically connects electronic components and conductors. PCBs may be single-sided, double-sided, and multilayered. PCBs are currently retained in device frames by either adhesive or provision of a lip in the frame that captures the edge of the PCB.
In an aspect, the present disclosure provides for, and includes, a detachable element for use with a reusable component having a retention groove and an alignment guide and a planar contact surface parallel to the retention groove, the detachable element comprising: a body comprising a retention feature configured to engage the retention groove, and an electrical contactor coupled to the body, where the contactor comprises a cantilever element that is configured to touch the planar contact surface when the retention feature is engaged with the retention groove, where the cantilever element is configured to slide along the contact surface as the detachable element is brought together with the reusable component.
In an aspect, the present disclosure provides for, and includes, a connector comprising: a reusable component comprising a retention groove and an electrical contact surface that is parallel to the retention groove; and a detachable element comprising a body with a retention feature configured to engage the retention groove and an electrical contactor coupled to the body, where the contactor comprises a compliant element that is configured to touch the contact surface of the reusable element when the retention feature of the detachable element is engaged with the retention groove of the reusable component and to slide along the contact surface as the detachable element is brought together with the reusable component.
In an aspect, the present disclosure provides for, and includes, a detachable element comprising: a body comprising a hole and a retention pocket, where the retention pocket comprises a reference surface; and a printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) comprising a printed circuit board (PCB) having an outer edge and a contactor coupled to the PCB, where a portion of the contactor extends beyond the outer edge of the PCB, where the portion of the contactor that extends beyond the outer edge of the PCB is in contact with the reference surface. In an aspect, an external surface of a PCB is flush with a surface of a frame without a protruding lip or the use of adhesive.
In an aspect, the present disclosure provides for, and includes, a detachable element comprising: a body comprising upper and lower sections joined by a flexible arm, where the upper section comprises an opening and the lower section is attached on its underside to a compressible spring; and a printed film having tabbed and non-tabbed areas, where the tabbed area comprises a sensor comprising two electrodes on one first face, and where the tabbed area is inserted between the upper and lower sections so that the sensor is aligned with the opening.
Aspects of the disclosure are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and are for purposes of illustrative discussion of aspects of the disclosure. In this regard, the description and the drawings, considered alone and together, make apparent to those skilled in the art how aspects of the disclosure may be practiced.
This description is not intended to be a detailed catalog of all the different ways in which the disclosure may be implemented, or all the features that may be added to the instant disclosure. For example, features illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be incorporated into other embodiments, and features illustrated with respect to a particular embodiment may be deleted from that embodiment. Thus, the disclosure contemplates that, in some embodiments of the disclosure, any feature or combination of features set forth herein can be excluded or omitted. In addition, numerous variations and additions to the various embodiments suggested herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the instant disclosure, which do not depart from the instant disclosure. In other instances, well-known structures, interfaces, and processes have not been shown in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the invention. It is intended that no part of this specification be construed to effect a disavowal of any part of the full scope of the invention. Hence, the following descriptions are intended to illustrate some particular embodiments of the disclosure, and not to exhaustively specify all permutations, combinations, and variations thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. The terminology used in the description of the disclosure herein is for the purpose of describing particular aspects or embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure.
All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties for the teachings relevant to the sentence and/or paragraph in which the reference is presented. References to techniques employed herein are intended to refer to the techniques as commonly understood in the art, including variations on those techniques or substitutions of equivalent techniques that would be apparent to one of skill in the art.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/827,375 (“the '375 application”) discloses an apparatus that measures the sub-epidermal capacitance using a bipolar sensor, where the sub-epidermal capacitance corresponds to the moisture content of the target region of skin of a patient. The '375 application also discloses an array of these bipolar sensors of various sizes.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/134,110 discloses an apparatus for measuring sub-epidermal moisture (SEM), where the device emits and receives an RF signal at a frequency of 32 kHz through a single coaxial sensor and generates a bioimpedance signal, then converts a biocapacitance signal to a SEM value.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/942,649 discloses a compact perfusion scanner and method of characterizing tissue heath status incorporating optical sensors to monitor tissue blood perfusion measurements and oximetry.
U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/827,375, 15/134,110, and 13/942,649 are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, it is specifically intended that the various features of the disclosure described herein can be used in any combination. Moreover, the present disclosure also contemplates that in some embodiments of the disclosure, any feature or combination of features set forth herein can be excluded or omitted.
The methods disclosed herein include and comprise one or more steps or actions for achieving the described method. The method steps and/or actions may be interchanged with one another without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In other words, unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the embodiment, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
As used in the description of the disclosure and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
As used herein, “and/or” refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items, as well as the lack of combinations when interpreted in the alternative (“or”).
The terms “about” and “approximately” as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as a length, a frequency, or a SEM value and the like, is meant to encompass variations of ±20%, ±10%, ±5%, ±1%, ±0.5%, or even ±0.1% of the specified amount.
As used herein, phrases such as “between X and Y” and “between about X and Y” should be interpreted to include X and Y. As used herein, phrases such as “between about X and Y” mean “between about X and about Y” and phrases such as “from about X to Y” mean “from about X to about Y.”
As used herein, the term “sub-epidermal moisture” or “SEM” refers to the increase in tissue fluid and local edema caused by vascular leakiness and other changes that modify the underlying structure of the damaged tissue in the presence of continued pressure on tissue, apoptosis, necrosis, and the inflammatory process.
As used herein, the term “biocapacitance” refers to the physical property that reflects the relative dielectric permittivity of the tissue, i.e. how much resistance to electrical fields is encountered in tissues.
As used herein, a “patient” may be a human or animal subject.
As used herein, the term “parallel” describes configurations where best-fit lines or planes of two objects have an approximately constant separation over a distance meaningful to the application. In certain embodiments, these best-fit lines or planes may have an included angle of ±1 degree, ±5 degrees, or ±10 degrees.
As used herein, the term “planar” describes configurations where the actual surface of an object varies from a best-fit ideal plane by a distance that is not significant in the function of the object. In certain embodiments, the distance between the actual surface and the ideal plane may be 0.254 mm (0.010 inches), 1.27 mm (0.050 inches), or 2.54 mm (0.100 inches).
As used herein, the term “diameter” refers to the length of a straight line segment that passes through the center of a circle and whose endpoints lie on the circle. The diameter is equal to twice the radius of the circle.
As used herein, the term “toroid” refers to a circular surface of revolution with a hole or an opening in its center. As used herein, the term “concentric” refers to two or more objects having the same center or axis.
As used herein, the term “printed film” refers to a segment of a polymeric film upon which conductive elements have been printed.
As used herein, the term “pogo pin” refers to a spring-loaded electrical connector mechanism.
In an aspect, detachable element 100 comprises a sensor formed from a plurality of electrodes such as up to two electrodes, up to three electrodes, up to four electrodes, up to five electrodes, up to six electrodes, up to seven electrodes, up to eight electrodes, up to nine electrodes, up to ten electrodes, up to eleven electrodes, or up to twelve electrodes. In an aspect, detachable element 100 comprises a plurality of sensors formed from a plurality of electrodes, where each sensor is formed from up to twelve electrodes, such as up to two electrodes, up to three electrodes, up to four electrodes, up to five electrodes, up to six electrodes, up to seven electrodes, up to eight electrodes, up to nine electrodes, up to ten electrodes, or up to eleven electrodes. In an aspect, a sensor is formed from an annular ring disposed around an inner circular electrode. In an aspect, a sensor is formed from two parallel bar electrodes. In an aspect, a sensor is formed from electrodes in the form of interdigitating fingers. In an aspect, detachable element 100 comprises a body 102 and a plurality of sensors selected from the group consisting of a plurality of bioimpedance sensors, a plurality of pressure sensors, a plurality of light sensors, a plurality of temperature sensors, a plurality of pH sensors, a plurality of perspiration sensors, a plurality of ultrasonic sensors, a plurality of bone growth stimulator sensors, and a plurality of a combination of these sensors. In an aspect, detachable element 100 comprises a body 102 and a plurality of light sensors. In an aspect, detachable element 100 further comprises one or more light emitting sources comprising dual emitters configured for emitting 660 nm and 880 nm light. In an aspect, reusable component 150 comprises an alignment guide 158, the function of which is described in greater detail with reference to
In an aspect, a sensor formed from an annular ring disposed around an inner circular electrode as depicted in
In an aspect, a ground plane is provided. In an aspect, a sensor is separated from a ground plane by a distance D4. In an aspect, D4 is about 0.4064 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, a ground plane has a diameter D5. In an aspect, D5 is equal to D3. In an aspect, D5 is greater than D3. In an aspect, D5 is about 28.575 mm (1.125 inches).
In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 2.794 mm (0.11 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 3.048 mm (0.12 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 3.302 mm (0.13 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 3.556 mm (0.14 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 3.81 mm (0.15 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 4.064 mm (0.16 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 4.318 mm (0.17 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 4.572 mm (0.18 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 4.826 mm (0.19 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 5.588 mm (0.22 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 6.096 mm (0.24 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 6.604 mm (0.26 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 7.112 mm (0.28 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 8.89 mm (0.35 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 11.43 mm (0.45 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is 12.7 mm (0.5 inches).
In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 2.794 mm (0.11 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 3.048 mm (0.12 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 3.302 mm (0.13 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 3.556 mm (0.14 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 3.81 mm (0.15 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 4.064 mm (0.16 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 4.318 mm (0.17 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 4.572 mm (0.18 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 4.826 mm (0.19 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 5.588 mm (0.22 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 6.096 mm (0.24 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 6.604 mm (0.26 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 7.112 mm (0.28 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 8.89 mm (0.35 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 11.43 mm (0.45 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is at least 12.7 mm (0.5 inches).
In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 3.81 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.15 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 3.81 mm and 5.08 mm (between 0.15 inches and 0.2 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 5.08 mm and 6.35 mm (between 0.2 inches and 0.25 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 6.35 mm and 7.62 mm (between 0.25 inches and 0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 7.62 mm and 8.89 mm (between 0.3 inches and 0.35 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 8.89 mm and 10.16 mm (between 0.35 inches and 0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 5.08 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.2 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 7.62 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 10.16 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 5.08 mm and 7.62 mm (between 0.2 inches and 0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 7.62 mm and 10.16 mm (between 0.3 inches and 0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 10.16 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.4 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 7.62 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.3 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 5.08 mm and 10.16 mm (between 0.2 inches and 0.4 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 7.62 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.3 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, the diameter of center electrode 102a is between 2.54 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.5 inches).
In an aspect, an annular or toroidal electrode has an inner diameter and an outer diameter. In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 12.7 mm (0.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 15.26 mm (0.6 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 17.78 mm (0.7 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 20.32 mm (0.8 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 22.86 mm (0.9 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 25.4 mm (1.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 30.48 mm (1.2 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 35.56 mm (1.4 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 40.64 mm (1.6 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 45.72 mm (1.8 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 50.8 mm (2.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 63.5 mm (2.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 76.2 mm (3.0 inches).
In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 12.7 mm (0.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 15.26 mm (0.6 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 17.78 mm (0.7 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 20.32 mm (0.8 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 22.86 mm (0.9 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 25.4 mm (1.0 inch). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 30.48 mm (1.2 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 35.56 mm (1.4 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 40.64 mm (1.6 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 45.72 mm (1.8 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 50.8 mm (2.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 63.5 mm (2.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 76.2 mm (3.0 inches).
In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.1 inches and 1 inch). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 50.8 mm (between 0.1 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 76.2 mm (between 0.1 inches and 3.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 12.7 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.0 inch). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 12.7 mm and 38.1 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 25.4 mm and 38.1 mm (between 1.0 inch and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 38.1 mm and 50.8 mm (between 1.5 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, the inner diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 50.8 mm and 76.2 mm (between 2.0 inches and 3.0 inches).
In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 12.7 mm (0.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 15.26 mm (0.6 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 17.78 mm (0.7 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 20.32 mm (0.8 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 22.86 mm (0.9 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 25.4 mm (1.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 30.48 mm (1.2 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 35.56 mm (1.4 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 40.64 mm (1.6 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 45.72 mm (1.8 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 50.8 mm (2.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 63.5 mm (2.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is 76.2 mm (3.0 inches).
In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 2.54 mm (0.1 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 5.08 mm (0.2 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 7.62 mm (0.3 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 10.16 mm (0.4 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 12.7 mm (0.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 15.26 mm (0.6 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 17.78 mm (0.7 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 20.32 mm (0.8 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 22.86 mm (0.9 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 25.4 mm (1.0 inch). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 30.48 mm (1.2 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 35.56 mm (1.4 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 40.64 mm (1.6 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 45.72 mm (1.8 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 50.8 mm (2.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 63.5 mm (2.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is at least 76.2 mm (3.0 inches).
In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.1 inches and 1 inch). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 50.8 mm (between 0.1 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 2.54 mm and 76.2 mm (between 0.1 inches and 3.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 12.7 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.0 inch). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 12.7 mm and 38.1 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 25.4 mm and 38.1 mm (between 1.0 inch and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 38.1 mm and 50.8 mm (between 1.5 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, the outer diameter of toroidal electrode 102b is between 50.8 mm and 76.2 mm (between 2.0 inches and 3.0 inches).
In an aspect, D4 is 0.254 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.2794 mm (0.011 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.3048 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.3302 mm (0.013 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.3556 mm (0.014 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.381 mm (0.015 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.4064 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.4318 mm (0.017 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.4572 mm (0.018 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.4826 mm (0.019 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.508 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.635 mm (0.025 inches). In an aspect, D4 is 0.762 mm (0.03 inches).
In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.254 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.2794 mm (0.011 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.3048 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.3302 mm (0.013 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.3556 mm (0.014 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.381 mm (0.015 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.4064 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.4318 mm (0.017 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.4572 mm (0.018 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.4826 mm (0.019 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.508 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.635 mm (0.025 inches). In an aspect, D4 is at least 0.762 mm (0.03 inches).
In an aspect, D4 is between 0.254 mm and 0.508 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.02 inches). In an aspect, D4 is between 0.254 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.03 inches). In an aspect, D4 is between 0.381 mm and 0.508 mm (between 0.015 inches and 0.02 inches). In an aspect, D4 is between 0.381 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.015 inches and 0.03 inches). In an aspect, D4 is between 0.508 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.02 inches and 0.03 inches).
In an aspect, D5 is between 2.54 mm and 12.7 mm (between 0.1 inches and 0.5 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 2.54 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.1 inches and 1 inch). In an aspect, D5 is between 2.54 mm and 50.8 mm (between 0.1 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 2.54 mm and 76.2 mm (between 0.1 inches and 3.0 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 12.7 mm and 25.4 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.0 inch). In an aspect, D5 is between 12.7 mm and 38.1 mm (between 0.5 inches and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 25.4 mm and 38.1 mm (between 1.0 inch and 1.5 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 38.1 mm and 50.8 mm (between 1.5 inches and 2.0 inches). In an aspect, D5 is between 50.8 mm and 76.2 mm (between 2.0 inches and 3.0 inches).
In an aspect, contactors 124 are attached to a printed circuit board (PCB) 120 that is coupled to the body 102. In one aspect, a plurality of contactors are coupled to body 102, such as up to one hundred contactors, up to ninety contactors, up to eighty contactors, up to seventy contactors, up to sixty contactors, up to fifty contactors, up to forty contactors, up to thirty contactors, up to twenty contactors, up to fifteen contactors, up to ten contactors, up to nine contactors, up to eight contactors, up to seven contactors, up to six contactors, up to five contactors, up to four contactors, or up to three contactors. In this example, each contactor 124 has two cantilever elements 126 that are independently movable. In an aspect, each contactor 124 comprises up to ten cantilever elements, such as up to nine cantilever elements, up to eight cantilever elements, up to seven cantilever elements, up to six cantilever elements, up to five cantilever elements, up to four cantilever elements, or up to three cantilever elements. In an aspect, the inside surface of at least some of wings 104 have a retention feature 110 that, in this example, extends out from the inside surface of the wing 104. In an aspect, each of wings 104 has a retention feature 110. In an aspect, retention feature 110 is a recess. In an aspect, each contactor 124 provides an electrical connection between an electrode of body 102 and PCB 120.
In an aspect, three planar contact surfaces 160a, 160b, and 160c are coupled to surface 162. In an aspect, contact surfaces 160a, 160b, 160c are formed as copper layers on the surface 162 and are generally coplanar (within a few thousands of an inch) with the surface 162. Contact surfaces 160a, 160b, 160c are conductive and, in an aspect, connected to circuits that are electrically isolated from each other. In an aspect, contact surfaces 160a, 160b, 160c comprise a surface coating of a noble metal, for example, gold, that may be mixed with other materials to improve physical properties, for example, abrasion resistance.
In an aspect, contact surfaces 160a, 160b, 160c are each planar and lie on a common plane that is parallel to the retention groove.
In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises conductive material. In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises a conductive compressible foam. In an aspect, a contactor 124 is conductively attached to PCB 120 and is configured to compress against any one of three planar contact surfaces 160a, 160b, and 160c when detachable element 100 (e.g. shown in
In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises a non-conductive material. In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises a non-conductive compressible foam. In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises a non-conductive spring element and a separate conductive element, where the conductive element is conductively attached to PCB 120 on one end and to a free end of the non-conductive spring element. In an aspect, a conductive element exposed on a free end of a non-conductive spring element is held against any one of three planar contact surfaces 160a, 160b, and 160c by the non-conductive spring element when detachable element 100 (e.g. shown in
In an aspect, a cantilever element 126 comprises a conductive material. In an aspect, a cantilever element 126 comprises a conductive compressible foam. In an aspect, a cantilever element 126 comprise a metallic coil spring.
In an aspect, a cantilever element 126 comprises a non-conductive material. In an aspect, a cantilever element 126 comprises a non-conductive compressible foam.
In an aspect, a contactor 124 comprises a compressible pogo pin, where the pogo pin is of suitable height in its compressed state to conductively join PCB 120 to planar contact surfaces 160a, 160b, and 160c when detachable element 100 (e.g. shown in
In an aspect, PCB 120 has an underside surface 122 with an outer edge 122a. In an aspect, outer edge 122a is circular. In an aspect, outer edge 122a may be of any shape. In an aspect, the contactors 124 have flanges 128 that extend beyond the outer edge 122a. In an aspect, each flange 128 has a center hole 128a and a top surface 128b. In an aspect, when PCB 120 is brought into contact with body 102, center holes 128a will fit over posts 182 as indicated by the dashed-line arrows and top surfaces 128b will contact reference surfaces 184.
In an aspect, the arrangement of PCB 120 fits closely into hole 190, where flanges 128 extending beyond the edge of outer edge 122a, and the reference surfaces adjacent to hole 190 allow PCB 120 to be inserted into hole 190 from below. In an aspect, by selection of an appropriate offset distance from reference surface 184 to top surface 153 (not visible in
In
In an aspect, contactor 124 may be formed as any compliant element that accomplishes the same function of providing an electrical connection between an element of PCB 120 and a conductive element of reusable component 150 (e.g. shown in
In an aspect, detachable element 100 and reusable component 150 (e.g. shown in
Body 102 comprises an opening 213 that, in this example, is a circular through-hole penetrating from a first surface 212 to a second surface 211. In an aspect, opening 213 is a notch or other open shape and may have an arbitrary shape defined by a perimeter 214. In this example, there is a lip or surface 216 recessed from a second surface 211. In this example, surface 216 is separated from a first surface 212 by a distance that is equal to the thickness of PCB 120. In an aspect, the separation of surfaces 212 and 216 is dependent upon the configuration of retainer 230. Surface 216 may have a diameter defined by a perimeter 218. In an aspect, surface 216 is coincident with second surface 211. In one aspect, surface 216 is comprised of multiple separate surfaces (not shown in
In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.127 mm (0.005 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.254 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.3048 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.3556 mm (0.014 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.4064 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.4572 mm (0.018 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.508 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.635 mm (0.025 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 0.762 mm (0.03 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 1.016 mm (0.04 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of 1.27 mm (0.05 inches).
In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.127 mm (0.005 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.254 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.3048 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.3556 mm (0.014 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.4064 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.4572 mm (0.018 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.508 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.635 mm (0.025 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 0.762 mm (0.03 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 1.016 mm (0.04 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of at least 1.27 mm (0.05 inches).
In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 0.254 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.01 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 0.381 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.015 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 0.508 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.02 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 0.635 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.025 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.03 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 1.016 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.04 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.127 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.005 inches and 0.05 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 0.381 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.015 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 0.508 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.02 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 0.635 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.025 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.03 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 1.016 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.04 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.254 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.01 inches and 0.05 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.381 mm and 0.508 mm (between 0.015 inches and 0.02 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.381 mm and 0.635 mm (between 0.015 inches and 0.025 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.381 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.015 inches and 0.05 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.508 mm and 0.762 mm (between 0.02 inches and 0.03 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.508 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.02 inches and 0.05 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.762 mm and 1.016 mm (between 0.03 inches and 0.04 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 0.762 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.03 inches and 0.05 inches). In an aspect, PCB 120 has a thickness of between 1.016 mm and 1.27 mm (between 0.04 inches and 0.05 inches).
PCB 120 is, in this example, a flat substrate of a nonconductive material, for example FR4, that is typical of printed circuit board fabrication processes. In an aspect, PCB 120 is a sensor. In one aspect, a sensor is selected from the group consisting of a bioimpedance sensor, a photodetector, a temperature sensor, a pH sensor, a perspiration sensor, an ultrasonic sensor, a bone growth stimulator sensor, and a combination thereof. PCB 120 has an underside surface 122 and an upper surface 224 that is parallel to the underside surface 122 and separated from the underside surface 122 by a thickness. PCB 120 has a perimeter 226 that, in this example, is circular and matches surface 216 of body 102. In an aspect, the shape of perimeter 226 is arbitrary. In an aspect, the shape of perimeter 226 is oval-shaped. In an aspect, the shape of perimeter 226 is square-shaped.
Retainer 230 comprises a body 232 and a plurality of tabs 234 formed such that a portion of retainer 230 extends beyond the perimeter of PCB 120 when retainer 230 is attached to PCB 120. Tabs 234 are positioned and shaped to contact surface 216 when the joined PCB-retainer subassembly is inserted into opening 213.
In an aspect, retainer 230 is strictly a mechanical positioning element that may be soldered to PCB 120 or attached via any other method, including adhesives and mechanical attachment such as a rivet or screw. In an aspect, a portion of retainer 230 is a conductive circuit element, such as a spring contactor 124 intended to make conductive contact with an external circuit element (not shown in
Assembly 300 further comprises a printed film 330 having a tabbed section 330a and a non-tabbed section 330b. A center electrode 350a and an outer electrode 350b (e.g. shown in
In an aspect, printed film 330 comprises a flexible plastic material. In a related aspect, the flexible plastic material is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene naphthalene (PEN), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyarylate (PAR), polyethersulfone (PES), fluorene polyester (FPE), polyimide (PI), and combinations thereof. In another aspect, printed film 330 comprises a non-plastic flexible material.
In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of 0.5 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of 0.4 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of 0.3 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of 0.25 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least 0.2 mm (0.008 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least 0.5 mm (0.02 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least 0.4 mm (0.016 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least 0.3 mm (0.012 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least 0.25 mm (0.01 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness of at least at least 0.2 mm (0.008 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness that is between 0.4 and 0.5 mm (0.02 and 0.016 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness that is between 0.3 and 0.4 mm (0.012 and 0.016 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness that is between 0.2 and 0.3 mm (0.008 and 0.012 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness that is between 0.25 and 0.35 mm (0.01 and 0.014 inches). In an aspect, printed film 330 has a thickness that is between 0.2 and 0.5 mm (0.008 and 0.02 inches).
In an aspect, printed film 330 is cut from a larger flexible sheet. In an aspect, electrodes 350a and 350b, conductive traces 360a and 360b, and contact pads 340a, 340b, and 340c are printed onto one face of a larger flexible sheet prior to cutting. In an aspect, more than one printed film 330 is cut from the same flexible sheet. In an aspect, conductive ink is used to print electrodes 350a and 350b, conductive traces 360a and 360b, and contact pads 340a, 340b, and 340c onto one face of a flexible sheet prior to cutting. In an aspect, electrodes 350a and 350b, conductive traces 360a and 360b, and contact pads 340a, 340b, and 340c are printed onto one face of a flexible sheet by a 2D or 3D printing process known in the art that is suitable for the manufacture of printed electronics. In an aspect, each printed film 330 is die-cut from a larger flexible sheet. In an aspect, electrodes 350a and 350b, conductive traces 360a and 360b, and contact pads 340a, 340b, and 340c are printed on a pre-cut piece of film.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the present invention can be embodied in various ways, which include but are not limited to the following:
While the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/751,082 filed May 23, 2022 know U.S. Pat. No. 11,600,939), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/164,706 filed Feb. 1, 2021 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,342,696), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/598,758 filed Oct. 10, 2019 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,950,960), which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/744,513, filed Oct. 11, 2018, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/804,095, filed Feb. 11, 2019, the contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3851641 | Toole et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4295009 | Weidler | Oct 1981 | A |
4557271 | Stoller et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4857716 | Gombrich et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4860753 | Amerena | Aug 1989 | A |
5001436 | Scot | Mar 1991 | A |
5073126 | Kikuchi et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5284150 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292341 | Snell | Mar 1994 | A |
5367789 | Lamont | Nov 1994 | A |
5815416 | Liebmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5904581 | Pope et al. | May 1999 | A |
6204749 | Ishihara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223088 | Scharnberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6254435 | Cheong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6312263 | Higuchi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330479 | Stauffer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368284 | Bardy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370426 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6434422 | Tomoda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6577700 | Fan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6634045 | DuDonis et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6738798 | Ploetz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6756793 | Hirono et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6963772 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7079899 | Petrofsky | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7291023 | Still | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315767 | Caduff et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7402135 | Leveque et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7783344 | Lackey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8011041 | Hann | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8060315 | Brosette et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8355925 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8390583 | Forutanpour et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8494617 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8648707 | Franz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8690785 | Lading | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8925392 | Esposito et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9028407 | Bennett-Guerrero | May 2015 | B1 |
9095305 | Engler et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9220455 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9271676 | Alanen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9398879 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9675289 | Heaton | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9763596 | Tonar et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9949683 | Afentakis | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9980673 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10085643 | Bandic et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10166387 | Bergelin et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10178961 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10182740 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10188340 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10194856 | Afentakis et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10206604 | Bergelin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10226187 | Al-Ali et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10278636 | Wu et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10285898 | Douglas et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10307060 | Tran | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10342482 | Lisy et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10383527 | Al-Ali | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10420602 | Horton et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10441185 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10448844 | Al-Ali et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10463293 | Maharbiz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10485447 | Tonar et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10898129 | Burns et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10950960 | Burns | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10959664 | Burns et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11191477 | Burns | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11253192 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11284810 | Tonar et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11304652 | Burns et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11337651 | Burns et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11342696 | Burns | May 2022 | B2 |
11426118 | Burns | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11471094 | Burns et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11534077 | Tonar et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11600939 | Burns | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11627910 | Burns et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11642075 | Burns et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20010051783 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016535 | Martin et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020070866 | Newham | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112898 | Honda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143262 | Bardy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009244 | Engleson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036674 | Bouton | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036713 | Bouton et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030110662 | Gilman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030116447 | Surridge et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130427 | Cleary et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139255 | Lina | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040041029 | Postman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046668 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054298 | Masuo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080325 | Ogura | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133092 | Kain | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147977 | Petrofsky | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171962 | Leveque et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176754 | Island et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236200 | Say et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254457 | Van Der Weide | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027175 | Yang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070778 | Lackey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086072 | Fox, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096513 | Ozguz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050177061 | Alanen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203435 | Nakada | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215918 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245795 | Goode et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251418 | Fox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060052678 | Drinan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058593 | Drinan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097949 | Luebke et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060206013 | Rothman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070043282 | Mannheimer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070106172 | Abreu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179585 | Chandler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191273 | Ambati et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213700 | Davison et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070248542 | Kane et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009764 | Davies | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015894 | Miller et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027509 | Andino et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039700 | Drinan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048680 | Hargreaves et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080259577 | Hu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278336 | Ortega et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090047694 | Shuber | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076410 | Libbus et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104797 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124924 | Eror et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090189092 | Aoi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209830 | Nagle et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090285785 | Jimi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326346 | Kracker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017182 | Voros et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030167 | Thirstrup et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042389 | Farruggia et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073170 | Siejko et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113979 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100268111 | Drinan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298687 | Yoo et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312233 | Furnish et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324455 | Rangel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324611 | Deming et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110046505 | Cornish et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110160548 | Forster | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175844 | Berggren et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184264 | Galasso, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191122 | Kharraz Tavakol et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237926 | Jensen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263950 | Larson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301441 | Bandic et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313311 | Gaw | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029410 | Koenig et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061257 | Yu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078088 | Whitestone et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120150011 | Besio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179006 | Jansen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190989 | Kaiser et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120271121 | Della Torre et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130041235 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130072870 | Heppe et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130121544 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123587 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137951 | Chuang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130253285 | Bly et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261496 | Engler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301255 | Kim et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310440 | Duskin et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130333094 | Rogers et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130338661 | Behnke, II | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140121479 | O'Connor et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142984 | Wright et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140200486 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221792 | Miller et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273025 | Hurskainen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275823 | Lane et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288397 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298928 | Duesterhoft et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316297 | McCaughan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140318699 | Longinotti-Buitoni et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150002168 | Kao et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009168 | Levesque et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150094548 | Sabatini et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150157435 | Chasins et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186607 | Gileijnse et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150230863 | Youngquist et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150343173 | Tobescu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363567 | Pettus | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150366499 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371522 | Mravyan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160015962 | Shokoueinejad Maragheh et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160038055 | Wheeler et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160058342 | Maiz-Aguinaga et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072308 | Nyberg et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100790 | Cantu et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160101282 | Bergelin et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160174631 | Tong et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160174871 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160220172 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270672 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160270968 | Stanford et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160278692 | Larson et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160296268 | Gee et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160310034 | Tonar et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160338591 | Lachenbruch et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170007153 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170014044 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170014045 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170105646 | Bryenton et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170156658 | Maharbiz et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172489 | Afentakis | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170188841 | Ma et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170238849 | Chapman et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170255812 | Kwon | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170311807 | Fu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170319073 | DiMaio et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180020058 | Martines et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180045725 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180220924 | Burns et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180220953 | Burns et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180220954 | Burns et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180220961 | Burns et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180360344 | Burns et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190000352 | Everett et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190038133 | Tran | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190053751 | Torres | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190060602 | Tran et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190069836 | Hettrick | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190104981 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190104982 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117964 | Bahrami et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190134396 | Toth et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190142333 | Burns et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147990 | Burns et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148901 | Komoto | May 2019 | A1 |
20190150882 | Maharbiz et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190175098 | Burns et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190192066 | Schoess et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190246972 | Burns et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190282436 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290189 | Sarrafzadeh et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190307360 | Tonar et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190307405 | Terry et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200008299 | Tran et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200043607 | Zerhusen et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200069240 | Burns | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200069241 | Burns | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200069242 | Burns et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200077892 | Tran | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200078499 | Gadde et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093395 | Tonar et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100723 | Burns | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200113488 | Al-Ali et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200127398 | Burns et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200296821 | Trublowski et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200297244 | Brownhill et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200297255 | Martinez et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20220287584 | Burns et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2020103438 | Jan 2021 | AU |
2811609 | Nov 2011 | CA |
2609842 | Oct 2016 | CA |
204119175 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104352230 | Feb 2015 | CN |
104567657 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105578333 | May 2016 | CN |
105963074 | Sep 2016 | CN |
208111467 | Nov 2018 | CN |
102012011212 | Dec 2012 | DE |
1080687 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1372475 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1569553 | Sep 2005 | EP |
3092946 | Nov 2016 | EP |
3280488 | Dec 2018 | EP |
2584808 | Dec 2020 | GB |
2000-060805 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-178705 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-326773 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003-169788 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-290166 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2005-52227 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2009-268611 | Nov 2009 | JP |
4418419 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2013-198639 | Oct 2013 | JP |
10-2014-0058445 | May 2014 | KR |
1996010951 | Apr 1996 | WO |
2001054580 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2002080770 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2004105602 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2006029035 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2007098762 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2009144615 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010060102 | May 2010 | WO |
2011004165 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011022418 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011080080 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011080262 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011091517 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011143071 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013116242 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014186894 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015003015 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015022583 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015077838 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015168720 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015169911 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2015195720 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016098062 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016172263 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016172264 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2017032393 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017214188 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2017218818 | Dec 2017 | WO |
2018071715 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018077560 | May 2018 | WO |
2018115461 | Jun 2018 | WO |
2018144938 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018144941 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018144943 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2018144946 | Aug 2018 | WO |
WO-2018168424 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018189265 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018209100 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2018234443 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2018236739 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2019020551 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019030384 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019048624 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019048626 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019048638 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019072531 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2019073389 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2019076967 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2019096828 | May 2019 | WO |
2019099810 | May 2019 | WO |
2019099812 | May 2019 | WO |
2019113481 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019157290 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019162272 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2020014779 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020043806 | Mar 2020 | WO |
2020053290 | Mar 2020 | WO |
2020077100 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2020187643 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2020187851 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2020234429 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2023, in European Patent Application No. 22211200. |
Alanen, “Measurement of Hydration in the Stratum Corneum with the MoistureMeter and Comparison with the Corneometer,” Skin Research and Technology, 10:32-37 (2004). |
Alberts et al., “The Extracellular Matrix of Animals,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed., pp. 1065-1127 (2002). |
Allman et al., “Pressure Ulcer Risk Factors Among Hospitalized Patients with Activity Limitation,” JAMA, 273:865-870 (1995). |
Anonymous, “Recommended Practices for Positioning the Patient in the Perioperative Practice Setting,” in Perioperative Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines, AORN, Inc., 525-548 (2006). |
Arao et al., “Morphological Characteristics of the Dermal Papillae in the Development of Pressure Sores,” World Wide Wounds (Mar. 1999), 6 pages (obtained online). |
Australian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action dated May 1, 2014, for corresponding Australian patent application No. 2011253253 (pp. 1-10) and pending claims (pp. 11-15) pp. 1-15. |
Australian Patent Office, Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2015, for corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2011253253 (pp. 1-4) and claims (pp. 5-10) pp. 1-10. |
Bader et al., “Effect of Externally Applied Skin Surface Forces on Tissue Vasculature,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67(11):807-11 (1986). |
Barnes, “Moisture Meters for Use on Thin Lumber and Veneers,” Moisture Register Co., 1-5 (1956). |
Bates-Jensen et al., “Subepidermal Moisture Predicts Erythema and Stage 1 Pressure Ulcers in Nursing Home Residents: A Pilot Study,” Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 55:1199-1205 (2007). |
Bates-Jensen et al., “subepidermal moisture differentiates erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents,” Wound Repair Regeneration, 16:189-197 (2008). |
Bates-Jensen et al., “Subepidermal Moisture Is Associated with Early Pressure Ulcer Damage in Nursing Home Residents with Dark Skin Tones; Pilot Findings,” Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 36(3):277-284 (2009). |
Bates-Jensen et al., “Subepidermal Moisture Detection of Pressure Induced Tissue Damage on the Trunk: The Pressure Ulcer Detection Study Outcomes,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, 25:502-511 (2017). |
Berggren, “Capacitive Biosensors,” Electroanalysis, 13(3):173-180 (2001), Wiley-VCH (publisher), Weinheim, Germany. |
Bergstrand et al., “Pressure-induced Vasodilation and Reactive Hyperemia at Different Depths in Sacral Tissue Under Clinically Relevant Conditions,” Microcirculation, 21:761-771 (2014). |
Bergstrom et al., “Pressure Ulcers in Adults: Prediction and Prevention,” Clinical Practice Guideline—Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians, 117 (1992). |
Black et al., “Differential Diagnosis of Suspected Deep Tissue Injury,” International Wound Journal, 13(4):531-539 (2015). |
Brem et al., “Protocol for the Successful Treatment of Pressure Ulcers,” The American Journal of Surgery, 188 (Suppl. To Jul. 2004):9S-17S (2004). |
Brem et al. “High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers,” American Journal of Surgery, 200:473-477 (2010). |
Brienza et al., “Friction-Induced Skin Injuries—Are They Pressure Ulcers?,” Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 42(1):62-64 (2015). |
Carmo-Araujo et al., “Ischaemia and reperfusion effects on skeletal muscle tissue: morphological and histochemical studies,” International Journal of Experimental Pathology, 88:147-154 (2007). |
Ceelen et al., “Compression-induced damage and internal tissue strains are related,” Journal of Biomechanics, 41:3399-3404 (2008). |
Ching et al., “Tissue electrical properties monitoring for the prevention of pressure sore,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 35(4):386-394 (2011). |
Clendenin et al., “Inter-operator and inter-device agreement and reliability of the SEM Scanner,” Journal of Tissue Viability, 24(1):17-23 (2015). |
De Lorenzo et al., “Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 82(5):1542-1558 (1997). |
De Oliveira et al., “Sub-epidermal moisture versus tradition and visual skin assessments to assess pressure ulcer risk in surgery patients,” Journal of Wound Care, 31(3):254-264 (2022), Mark Allen Group (pub.) (obtained online). |
Demarre et al., “The cost of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in hospitals and nursing homes in Flanders: A cost-of-illness study,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, 1-14 (2015). |
Dodde et al., “Bioimpedance of soft tissue under compression,” Physiology Measurement, 33(6):1095-1109 (2012). |
Dupont, “Pyralux® FR Coverlay, Bondply & Sheet Adhesive,” webage, Retrieved from: www2.dupont.com/Pyralux/en_US/products/adhesives_films/FR/FR_films_html pp. 1-2 (2012). |
DuPont, “General Specifications for Kapton Polyimide Film,” Retrieved from Dupont: http://www2.dupont.com/Kapton/en_US/assets/downloads/pdf/Gen_Specs.pdf, pp. 1-7 (2012). |
DuPont, “Pyralux® FR Copper-clad Laminate,” webpage, Retrieved from: www2.dupont.com/Pyraluxlen_US/ productsllaminate/FR/pyralux_fr.html, pp. 1-2 (2012). |
Eberlein-Gonska et al., “The Incidence and Determinants of Decubitus Ulcers in Hospital Care: An Analysis of Routine Quality Management Data at a University Hospital,” Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 110(33-34):550-556 (2013). |
European Patent Office, ESSR issued on Aug. 22, 2014, for corresponding European Patent Application No. 11781061.4 (pp. 1-7) and pending claims (pp. 3-10) pp. 1-10. |
European Patent Office, Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2015, for corresponding European Patent Application No. 11781061.4 (pp. 1-5) and claims (pp. 6-9) pp. 1-9. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 30, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 16169670. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 18, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 16166483.4. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 13, 2017, in European Patent Application No. 16196899.5. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2019, in European Patent Application No. 19186393.5. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 19, 2019, in European Patent Application No. 19190000.0. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2020, in European Patent Application No. 18748733.5. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2020, in European Patent Application No. 18748025.6. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2020, in European Patent Application No. 18748512.3. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2020, in European Patent Application No. 18747707.0. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 17, 2022, in European Patent Application No. 19838240.0. |
Extended European Search Report dated May 24, 2022, in European Patent Application No. 19871332.3. |
Ford, “Hospice Wins Award for Innovation in Pressure Ulcer Prevention,” Nursing Times, downloaded and printed on Apr. 18, 2020, from https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/research-and-innovation/hospice-wins-award-for-innovation-in-pressure-ulcer-prevention-30-11-2018/ (2018). |
Gabriel et al., “The dielectric properties of bilogical tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41:2251-69 (1996). |
Gabriel, “Compilation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues at Rf and Microwave Frequencies Report,” Occupational and Environmental Health Directorate, (1996). |
Gardiner et al., “Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers—a population-based cohort study,” International Wound Journal, 11(6):696-700 (2014). |
Gershon et al., “SEM Scanner Readings to Assess Pressure Induced Tissue Damage,” Proceedings of the 17th Annual European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) meeting, Stockholm, Sweden (2014). |
Gonzalez-Correa et al., “Electrical bioimpedance readings increase with higher pressure applied to the measuring probe,” Physiology Measurement, 26:S39-S47 (2005). |
Great Britain Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2020, in Great Britain Patent Application No. GB2002889.0. |
Great Britain Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2021, in Great Britain Patent Application No. GB2106848.1. |
Great Britain Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2022, in Great Britain Patent Application No. GB2118088.0. |
Great Britain Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2022, in Great Britain Patent Application No. GB2118092.2. |
Guihan et al., “Assessing the feasibility of subepidermal moisture to predict erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injury: A pilot study,” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 35(1):46-52 (2012). |
Hamazoto et al., “Estimate of Burn Depth by Non-Invasive Capacitance Measurement,” Japan Soc. ME & BE, 42:266 (Jun. 2003). |
Harrow, “Subepidermal moisture surrounding pressure ulcers in persons with a spinal cord injury: A pilot study,” Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 37(6):719-728 (2014). |
Hou, “Section IV. Osteofascial Compartment Syndrome,” Limbs Trauma, 7:215-217 (2016), Hubei Science & Technology Publishing House (pub.), Wuhan, China. |
Houwing et al., “Pressure-induced skin lesions in pigs: reperfusion injury and the effects of vitamin E,” Journal of Wound Care, 9(1):36-40 (2000). |
Huang et al., “A device for skin moisture and environment humidity detection,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 206-212 (2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 9, 2012, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/035618. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 22, 2016, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/28515. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 26, 2016, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/28516. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2018, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/016731. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2018, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/016738. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 26, 2018, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/016741. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 12, 2018, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/016736. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2018, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/038055. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2019, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/061494. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 5, 2019, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/064527. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 11, 2019, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/061497. |
International Search Report dated May 29, 2019, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/017226. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 9, 2020, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/055655. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 8, 2020, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/051134. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 17, 2021, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/023818. |
International Search Report dated May 13, 2022, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/014913. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2022, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/025508. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 15, 2022, issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/019338. |
Jan et al., “Local cooling reduces skin ischemia under surface pressure in rats: an assessment by wavelet analysis of laser Doppler blood flow oscillations,” Physiology Measurement, 33(10):1733-1745 (2012). |
Jaskowski, “Evaluation of the Healing Process of Skin Wounds by Means of Skin Absolute Value of Electrical Impedance,” Dermatol. Mon.schr., 172(4):223-228 (1986). |
Jiang et al., “Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury-Induced Histological Changes Affecting Early Stage Pressure Ulcer Development in a Rat model,” Ostomy Wound Management, 57:55-60 (2011). |
Jiang et al., “Expression of cytokines, growth factors and apoptosis-related signal molecules in chronic pressure ulcer wounds healing,” Spinal Cord, 52(2):145-151 (2014). |
Jiricka et al., “Pressure Ulcer Risk factors in an ICU Population,” American Journal of Critical Care, 4:361-367 (1995). |
Kanai et al., “Electrical measurement of fluid distribution in legs and arms,” Medical Progress through Technology Journal, 12:159-170 (1987). |
Kasuya et al., “Potential application of in vivo imaging of impaired lymphatic duct to evaluate the severity of pressure ulcer in mouse model,” Scientific Reports, 4:4173 (7 pages) (2014). |
Lee, “CapSense Best Practices,” Application Note 2394, 1-10 (2007). |
Liu et al., “A Systematic Review of Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment in People with Spinal Cord Injuries,” The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 37(6):703-718 (2014). |
Loerakker et al., “Temporal Effects of Mechanical Loading on Deformation-Induced Damage in Skeletal Muscle Tissue,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 38(8):2577-2587 (2010). |
Loerakker et al., “The effects of deformation, ischemia, and reperfusion on the development of muscle damage during prolonged loading,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(4):1168-1177 (2011). |
Lyder et al., “Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients at Risk for Pressure Ulcers,” Archives of Internal Medicine,161:1549-1554 (2001). |
Martinsen, “Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics,” Elsevier Academic Press, Chapters 1 and 10 (2015). |
Mathiesen et al., “Are labour-intensive efforts to prevent pressure ulcers cost-effective?” Journal of Medical Economics, 16(10):1238-1245 (2013). |
Matthie et al., “Analytic assessment of the various bioimpedance methods used to estimate body water,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 84(5):1801-1816 (1998). |
Miller et al., “Lymphatic Clearance during Compressive Loading,” Lymphology, 14(4):161-166 (1981). |
Moore et al., “A randomised controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30° tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20:2633-2644 (2011). |
Moore et al., “Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices in care of the older person in the Republic of Ireland,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21:362-371 (2012). |
Moore et al., “A review of PU prevalence and incidence across Scandinavia, Iceland and Ireland (Part I)”, Journal of Wound Care, 22(7):361-362, 364-368 (2013). |
Moore et al., “Subepidermal Moisture (SEM) and Bioimpedance: A Literature Review of a Novel Method for Early Detection of Pressure-Induced Tissue Damage (Pressure Ulcers),” International Wound Journal, 14(2):331-337 (2016). |
Moore, “Using SEM (Sub Epidermal Moisture) Measurement for Early Pressure Ulcer Detection,” Institute for Pressure Injury Prevention, WCICT 2017 (Jun. 20-21), Manchester, UK, 7 pp., available at www.pressureinjuryprevention.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ipip_Moore_Sub_Epidermal_Moisture_notes.pdf (2017) (obtained online). |
Moore et al., “SEM Scanner Made Easy,” Wounds International, pp. 1-6, available at www.woundsinternational.com (2018). |
Mulasi, “Bioimpedance at the Bedside: Current Applications, Limitations, and Opportunities,” Nutritional Clinical Practice, 30(2):180-193 (2015). |
Musa et al., “Clinical impact of a sub-epidermal moisture scanner: what is the real-world use?,” J. Wound Care, 30(3):2-11 (2021), Mark Allen Group (pub.) (obtained online). |
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel et al., “Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline,” Cambridge Media, (2014). |
Nixon et al., “Pathology, diagnosis, and classification of pressure ulcers: comparing clinical and imaging techniques,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, 13(4):365-372 (2005). |
Nuutinen et al., “Validation of a new dielectric device to assess changes of tissue water in skin and subcutaneous fat,” Physiological Measurement, 25:447-454 (2004). |
O'Goshi, “Skin conductance; validation of Skicon-200EX compared to the original model, Skicon-100,” Skin Research and Technology, 13:13-18 (2007). |
Oliveira, “The Accuracy of Ultrasound, Thermography, Photography and Sub-Epidermal Moisture as a Predictor of Pressure Ulcer Presence—a Systematic Review,” RCSI, School of Nursing thesis (2015). |
Oomens et al., “Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Injury Explained,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 43(2):297-305 (2015). |
Pang et al. (eds.) Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes, China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (publisher), Beijing, China, pp. 466-468 (Oct. 2016), with English Translation. |
Rotaru et al., “Friction between Human Skin and Medical Textiles for Decubitus Prevention,” Tribology International, 65:91-96 (2013). |
Saxena, The Pocket Doctor: Obstetrics & Gynecology, pp. 76-77 (2017), Tianjin Science & Technology Translation & Publishing Co. Ltd. (pub.), Tianjin, China. |
Scallan et al., “Chapter 4: Pathophysiology of Edema Formation,” Capillary Fluid Exchange: Regulation, Functions, and Pathology, 47-61 (2010). |
Schultz et al., “Extracellular matrix: review of its role in acute and chronic wounds,” World Wide Wounds, 1-20 (2005). |
Schwan, “Electrical properties of tissues and cells,” Advances in Biology and Medical Physics, 15:148-199 (1957). |
Seibert et al., “Technical Expert Panel Summary Report: Refinement of a Cross-Setting Pressure Ulcer/Injury Quality Measure for Skilled Nursing Facilities, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities, Long-Term Care Hospitals, and Home Health Agencies,” RTI International Abt Associates, CMS Contract No. HHSM-500-2013-130151, 49 pp. (Aug. 2019). |
Sener et al., “Pressure ulcer-induced oxiadative organ injury is ameliorated by beta-glucan treatment in rats,” International Immunopharmacology, 6(5):724-732 (2006). |
Sewchuck et al., “Prevention and Early Detection of Pressure Ulcers in Patients Undergoing Cardian Surgery,” AORN Journal, 84(1):75-96 (2006). |
Sprigle et al., “Analysis of Localized Erythema Using Clinical Indicators and Spectroscopy,” Ostomy Wound Management, 49:42-52 (2003). |
Stekelenburg et al., “Role of ischemia and deformation in the onset of compression-induced deep tissue injury: MRI-based studies in a rat model,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 102:2002-2011 (2007). |
Stekelenburg et al., “Deep Tissue Injury: How Deep is Our Understanding?” Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 89(7):1410-1413 (2008). |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report dated Jan. 27, 2020, in European Patent Application No. 18747707. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report dated Jul. 13, 2021, in European Patent Application No. 18887039. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report dated Oct. 1, 2021, in European Patent Application No. 19751130. |
Swisher et al., “Impedance sensing device enables early detection of pressure ulcers in vivo,” Nature Communications, 6:6575-6584 (2015). |
Thomas et al., “Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers and Risk of Death,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44:1435-1440 (1996). |
Thomas, “Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers,” J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., 7:46-59 (2006). |
Truong et al., “Pressure Ulcer Prevention in the Hospital Setting Using Silicone Foam Dressings,” Cureus, 8(8):e730, pp. 1-6 (2016). |
Tur et al., “Topical Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment of Ischemic Ulcers in the Guinea Pig: Blood Recruitment in Multiple Skin Sites,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 33:217-221 (1995). |
Valentinuzzi et al., “Bioelectrical Impedance Techniques in Medicine. Part II: Monitoring of Physiological Events by Impedance,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 24(4-6):353-466 (1996). |
Vangilder et al., “Results of Nine International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Surveys: 1989 to 2005,” Ostomy Wound Management, 54(2):40-54 (2008). |
Vowden et al., “Diabetic Foot Ulcer or Pressure Ulcer? That Is the Question,” The Diabetic Foot Journal, 18:62-66 (2015). |
Wagner et al., “Bioelectrical Impedance as a Discriminator of Pressure Ulcer Risk,” Advances in Wound Care, 9(2):30-37 (1996). |
Wang et al., “A Wireless Biomedical Instrument for Evidence-Based Tissue Wound Characterization,” Wireless Health, pp. 222-223 (2010). |
Wang, “Biomedical Systen for Monitoring Pressure Ulcer Development,” UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations, California, USA, pp. 1-123 (2013). |
Watanabe et al., “CT anlysis of the use of the electrical impedance technique to estimate local oedema in the extremities in patients with lymphatic obstruction,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 36(1):60-65 (1998). |
Weiss, “Tissue destruction by neutrophils,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 320(6):365-76 (1989). |
Yang, Handbook of Practical Burn Surgery, p. 48 (2008), People's Military Medical Press (pub.), Beijing, China. |
Zanibbi, “Pattern Recognition: An Overview,” downloaded from https://www.cs.rit.edu/˜rlaz/prec20092/slides/Overview.pdf, 30 pp. (2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230335929 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62804095 | Feb 2019 | US | |
62744513 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17751082 | May 2022 | US |
Child | 18167610 | US | |
Parent | 17164706 | Feb 2021 | US |
Child | 17751082 | US | |
Parent | 16598758 | Oct 2019 | US |
Child | 17164706 | US |