The present invention is related to hearing systems, devices and methods. Although specific reference is made to hearing aid systems, embodiments of the present invention can be used in many applications in which a signal is used to stimulate the ear.
People like to hear. Hearing allows people to listen to and understand others. Natural hearing can include spatial cues that allow a user to hear a speaker, even when background noise is present.
Hearing devices can be used with communication systems to help the hearing impaired. Hearing impaired subjects need hearing aids to verbally communicate with those around them. Open canal hearing aids have proven to be successful in the marketplace because of increased comfort and an improved cosmetic appearance. Another reason why open canal hearing aids can be popular is reduced occlusion of the ear canal. Occlusion can result in an unnatural, tunnel-like hearing effect which can be caused by hearing aids which at least partially occlude the ear canal. In at least some instances, occlusion can be noticed by the user when he or she speaks and the occlusion results in an unnatural sound during speech. However, a problem that may occur with open canal hearing aids is feedback. The feedback may result from placement of the microphone in too close proximity with the speaker or the amplified sound being too great. Thus, feedback can limit the degree of sound amplification that a hearing aid can provide. Although feedback can be decreased by placing the microphone outside the ear canal, this placement can result in the device providing an unnatural sound that is devoid of the spatial location information cues present with natural hearing.
In some instances, feedback may be decreased by using non-acoustic stimulation of the natural hearing transduction pathway, for example stimulating the tympanic membrane, bones of the ossicular chain and/or the cochlea. An output transducer may be placed on the eardrum, the ossicles in the middle ear, or the cochlea to stimulate the hearing pathway. Such an output transducer may be electro magnetically based. For example, the transducer may comprise a magnet and coil placed on the ossicles to stimulate the hearing pathway. Surgery is often needed to place a hearing device on the ossicles or cochlea, and such surgery can be somewhat invasive in at least some instances. At least some of the known methods of placing an electromagnetic transducer on the eardrum may result in occlusion in some instances.
One promising approach has been to place a transducer on the eardrum and drive the transducer. For example, a magnet can be placed on the eardrum and driven with a coil positioned away from the eardrum. The magnets can be electromagnetically driven with a coil to cause motion in the hearing transduction pathway thereby causing neural impulses leading to the sensation of hearing. A permanent magnet may be coupled to the ear drum through the use of a fluid and surface tension, for example as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,259,032 and 6,084,975. Another approach can be to place a magnet and coil on the eardrum to vibrate the eardrum.
However, there is still room for improvement. The mass of a coil and magnet placed on the eardrum can result in occlusion in at least some instances. With a magnet positioned on the eardrum and coil positioned away from the magnet, the strength of the magnetic field generated to drive the magnet may decrease rapidly with the distance from the driver coil to the permanent magnet. Because of this rapid decrease in strength over distance, efficiency of the energy to drive the magnet may be less than ideal. Also, placement of the driver coil near the magnet may cause discomfort for the user in some instances. There can also be a need to align the driver coil with the permanent magnet that may, in some instances, cause the performance to be less than ideal.
For the above reasons, it would be desirable to provide hearing systems which at least decrease, or even avoid, at least some of the above mentioned limitations of the current hearing devices. For example, there is a need to provide a comfortable hearing device which provides hearing with natural qualities, for example with spatial information cues, and which allow the user to hear with less occlusion, distortion and feedback than current devices.
Patents and publications that may be relevant to the present application include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,585,416; 3,764,748; 3,882,285; 5,142,186; 5,554,096; 5,624,376; 5,795,287; 5,800,336; 5,825,122; 5,857,958; 5,859,916; 5,888,187; 5,897,486; 5,913,815; 5,949,895; 6,005,955; 6,068,590; 6,093,144; 6,137,889; 6,139,488; 6,174,278; 6,190,305; 6,208,445; 6,217,508; 6,222,302; 6,241,767; 6,422,991; 6,475,134; 6,519,376; 6,620,110; 6,626,822; 6,676,592; 6,728,024; 6,735,318; 6,900,926; 6,920,340; 7,072,475; 7,095,981; 7,239,069; 7,289,639; D512,979; 2002/0086715; 2003/0142841; 2004/0234092; 2005/0020873; 2006/0107744; 2006/0233398; 2006/075175; 2007/0083078; 2007/0191673; 2008/0021518; 2008/0107292; commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,259,032; 5,276,910; 5,425,104; 5,804,109; 6,084,975; 6,554,761; 6,629,922; U.S. Publication Nos. 2006/0023908; 2006/0189841; 2006/0251278; and 2007/0100197. Non-U.S. patents and publications that may be relevant include EP1845919 PCT Publication Nos. WO 03/063542; WO 2006/075175; U.S. Publication Nos. Journal publications that may be relevant include: Ayatollahi et al., “Design and Modeling of Micromachines Condenser MEMS Loudspeaker using Permanent Magnet Neodymium-Iron-Boron (Nd—Fe—B)”, ISCE, Kuala Lampur, 2006; Birch et al, “Microengineered Systems for the Hearing Impaired”, IEE, London, 1996; Cheng et al., “A silicon microspeaker for hearing instruments”, J. Micromech. Microeng., 14(2004) 859-866; Yi et al., “Piezoelectric microspeaker with compressive nitride diaphragm”, IEEE, 2006, and Zhigang Wang et al., “Preliminary Assessment of Remote Photoelectric Excitation of an Actuator for a Hearing Implant”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, Shanghai, China, Sep. 1-4, 2005. Other publications of interest include: Gennum GA3280 Preliminary Data Sheet, “Voyager TDTM.Open Platform DSP System for Ultra Low Power Audio Processing” and National Semiconductor LM4673 Data Sheet, “LM4673 Filterless, 2.65 W, Mono, Class D audio Power Amplifier”; Puria, S. et al., Middle ear morphometry from cadaveric temporal bone micro CT imaging, Invited Talk. MEMRO 2006, Zurich; Puria, S. et al, A gear in the middle ear ARO 2007, Baltimore, Md.
The present invention is related to hearing systems, devices and methods. Although specific reference is made to hearing aid systems, embodiments of the present invention can be used in many applications in which a signal is used to stimulate the ear.
Embodiments of the present invention provide improved hearing which overcomes at least some of the aforementioned limitations of current systems. In many embodiments, a device to transmit an audio signal to a user may comprise a transducer and a support. The support is configured for placement on the eardrum to couple the transducer to the umbo to drive the eardrum. The transducer can be positioned on the support to extend away from the umbo so as to decrease occlusion and lower mechanical impedance when the support is placed on the eardrum. For example, the transducer can be coupled to the support at an inner first location corresponding to a location of the eardrum at or near the umbo, and coupled to an outer second location corresponding to an outer portion of the eardrum or skin disposed over the bony process so as to decrease occlusion. The transducer can be coupled to the support with a conformable material so as to inhibit loading of the transducer and decrease occlusion when the support is coupled to the eardrum, and the conformable material can transmit substantially audible frequencies that correspond to hearing loss of the user, for example frequencies above about 1 kHz. The conformable material may comprise one or more of many materials such as a resilient material, a resilient spring material, a sponge material, a silicone sponge material, a viscous liquid, a viscoelastic material, or a viscoelastic memory foam, for example. The transducer may be very energy efficient, for example, by comprising an energy efficient electromagnetic balanced armature, and the support and transducer coupled to the eardrum can transmit sound very efficiently. Hearing devices making use of such an audio signal transmission device can have advantages such as longer battery life, smaller battery components, smaller size, and enhanced comfort while inhibiting or minimizing feedback and occlusion effects. The support and transducer can be coupled so as to receive an audio signal in many ways, for example with wired conductive coupling from an amplifier output to the transducer, or with wireless signal transmission such as electromagnetic coupling and optical coupling.
In a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit an audio signal to a user. The user has an ear comprising an eardrum and a malleus connected to the ear drum at an umbo. The device comprises a transducer and a support. The support is configured for placement at least partially on the eardrum. The transducer is coupled to the support at a first location and a second location to drive the eardrum when the support is placed at least partially on the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the first location corresponds to the at least a portion of the malleus of the ear, and the second location corresponds to a location away from the first location, such that the first location is separated from the second location by a distance of at least about 1 mm. The first location may correspond to the umbo of the ear.
The second location of the support may correspond to at least one of a lateral process of the malleus or a bony part of the external ear canal when the support is placed on the eardrum. The second location of the support may correspond to the lateral process of the malleus. The transducer may comprise an elongate dimension extending between the first location and the second location, in which the elongate dimension of the transducer is within a range from about 2 mm to about 5 mm.
Alternatively, the second location of the support may correspond to a location of the eardrum away from the lateral process of the malleus so as to decrease interference from blood flow. The transducer may comprises an elongate dimension extending between the first location and the second location, and the elongate dimension of the transducer can be within a range from about 2 mm to about 5 mm.
The second location of the support may correspond to the bony part of the external ear canal. The transducer may comprise an elongate dimension extending between the first location and the second location, in which the elongate dimension is within a range from about 4 mm to about 10 mm. The second location of the support may correspond to a portion of the bony part of the external ear canal located away from the malleus to decrease interference from blood flowing along the malleus to the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises a center of mass, and the transducer is positioned on the support such that the center of mass of the transducer corresponds to a location along the eardrum away from the umbo when the support is placed on the eardrum. For example, the transducer may extend between the first location and the second location toward a bony part of the ear canal when the support is placed on the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the transducer is coupled to the support to support the transducer at the first location and the second location. The transducer may comprise a movable structure coupled to the support at the first location and configured to drive the eardrum at the first location in response to movement of the movable structure.
In many embodiments, a second movement at the second location is less than a first movement at the first location when the transducer drives the eardrum. The second movement at the second location may be no more than about 75% of the first movement of the first location when the transducer drives the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises a first attachment structure affixed to the support at the first location. For example the first attachment structure may be embedded in the support at the first location to affix the attachment structure to the support. The first attachment structure is coupled to an elongate movable structure of the transducer. For example, the attachment structure may be affixed to the elongate movable structure. The elongate movable structure may comprise at least one of a reed or an armature configured to move in response to the audio signal.
In many embodiments, an extension structure extends from the elongate movable structure to the first attachment structure to couple the elongate movable structure to the first attachment structure. The device may further comprise a second attachment structure affixed to the support at a second location. The extension structure may comprise at least one of a tuning structure or a structure that does not flex substantially when the ear is driven. For example, the extension structure may comprise the tuning structure to tune a gain of the transducer in response to frequencies, and the tuning structure may be coupled to the support at the first location. The extension structure may comprise a structure that does not flex substantially when the ear is driven, for example a rod, and the rod can be composed of surgical grade stainless steel configured such that the rod does not flex substantially when the ear is driven. At least one of the extension structure or the first attachment structure may comprise a conformable material so as to decrease low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer and occlusion when the transducer is coupled to the eardrum with the support. The conformable material may comprise one or more of a viscoelastic material or a viscous liquid.
The second attachment structure may be coupled to the transducer away from the elongate movable structure. The elongate movable structure may extend along a first elongate dimension and the second support may extend along a second dimension transverse to the first dimension. The first attachment structure may comprise at least one of a plate, a coil, a dome, a tripod, or a cone embedded in the support at the first location. The first attachment structure may comprise a maximum dimension across of no more than about 3 mm.
In many embodiments, the support is shaped to the eardrum of the user to align the transducer with the eardrum in a pre-determined orientation. A fluid may be disposed between the eardrum and the support to couple the support with the eardrum. The transducer may be positioned on the support to align an elongate dimension of the transducer with the malleus of the user when the support is placed on the eardrum. The transducer comprises an elongate structure configured to move in response to the audio signal. The elongate structure may be positioned on the support to align with a handle of the malleus of the user when the support is placed on the eardrum. The support may comprise a shape that corresponds to the eardrum of the user to couple the support to the eardrum with the predetermined orientation. For example, the support may comprise a shape from a mold of the eardrum of the user. The transducer may be positioned on the support such that an elongate dimension of the transducer extends along a handle of the malleus when the support is placed on the eardrum of the user. The transducer may be positioned on the support to align the transducer with the lateral process of the malleus when the support is placed on the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises at least one of an electromagnetic balanced armature transducer, a piezoelectric transducer, a magnetostrictive transducer, a photostrictive transducer, an electrostatic transducer, a coil or a magnet. A transducer may comprise the electromagnetic balanced armature transducer, and the balanced armature transducer may comprise an armature configured to move in response to a magnetic field. The armature may be positioned on the support and the coupled to the first location to balance the armature when the support is placed on the eardrum of the user. The device may further comprise an extension structure coupled to the armature and the first location. The extension structure can extend from the armature to the first location along a distance within a range from about 0.5 mm to about 2.0 mm to balance the armature when the support is placed on the eardrum. The extension structure may comprise at least one of a substantially non-flexible structure or a tuning structure.
In many embodiments, at least one of the extension structure or the first attachment structure comprises a conformable viscoelastic material to decrease low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer and occlusion when the transducer is coupled to the eardrum with the support. For example, the extension structure may comprise the conformable material, the attachment structure may comprise the conformable material, or both the extension structure and the attachment structure may comprise the conformable viscoelastic material. The conformable material may comprise one or more of an elastic material, a viscous material or a viscoelastic material.
The armature may extend along a first elongate dimension and the extension structure can extend along a second elongate dimension transverse to the first dimension. The balanced armature transducer may comprise an armature having at least one of a mass, a damping or a stiffness and the at least one of the mass, the damping or the stiffness is configured to match at least one of a mass, a damping or a stiffness of the support and the eardrum when the support is placed on the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the balanced armature transducer is adapted to drive the support when the support is coupled to the eardrum. The balanced armature transducer may be adapted to drive the support by optimization of at least one of an output mechanical impedance of the armature matched to an input mechanical impedance of the support, a size of the balanced armature transducer, a length of the balanced armature transducer, an electrical impedance of the balanced armature transducer, materials from which the balanced armature transducer is made, a spring constant of a restoring member coupled to the armature of the balanced armature transducer to restore the armature to a neutral position, a number of turns of a wire of a coil wrapped around the armature of the balanced armature transducer, a moment of inertia of the balanced armature, a countermass on the balanced armature opposite the support to balance a mechanical load of the support, or a diameter of the wire of the coil wrapped around the armature of the balanced armature transducer.
In many embodiments, the transducer and the support may be configured to provide a sound output of at least 80 dB (SPL) and no more than 5% distortion at 10 kHz with no more than about 1 mW of electrical power input to the transducer. In some embodiments, the transducer and the support may be configured to provide the sound output of at least 80 dB (SPL) with no more than 5% distortion over a range from about 100 Hz to about 10 kHz with the no more than about 1 mW of electrical power input to the transducer.
In many embodiments, the device may further comprise a casing affixed to the body of the transducer and circuitry coupled to the transducer to drive the transducer. The circuitry is supported with the support when the support is placed on the eardrum. The support, the casing, the transducer and the circuitry comprise a combined mass of no more than about 120 mg, in which the transducer is positioned on the support such that the combined mass when the support is positioned on the eardrum corresponds to a mass of no more than about 60 mg at the umbo. This placement of the transducer can substantially decrease occlusion perceived the user. In some embodiments, the support, the casing, the circuitry, and the transducer comprise a combined mass of no more than about 80 mg, in which the transducer is positioned on the support such that the combined mass when the support is positioned on the eardrum corresponds to a mass of no more than about 40 mg at the umbo.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises at least one photodetector coupled to the transducer. The at least one photodetector comprises an output impedance. The transducer comprises a balanced armature transducer comprising an input impedance. The output impedance of the at least one photodetector matches the input impedance of the balanced armature transducer. In many embodiments, the at least one photodetector comprises a photovoltaic transducer.
In many embodiments, the transducer is electrically coupled to at least one of a coil, an electrical connection, an output amplifier or a sound processor.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of transmitting an audio signal to a user. The user has an ear comprising an eardrum and a malleus connected to the ear drum at an umbo. The method comprises supporting a transducer with a support positioned on the eardrum, and vibrating the support and the eardrum with the transducer positioned away from the umbo. The transducer may be coupled to the support at a first location and a second location. The first location corresponds to the umbo and the transducer drives the umbo from the first location. The second location is spaced apart from the first location such that the second location moves less than the first location when the transducer drives the umbo.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of transmitting an audio signal to a user. The user has an ear comprising an eardrum and a malleus connected to the ear drum at an umbo. A support is placed on the eardrum of the user to couple the transducer to the umbo to drive the eardrum. The transducer is coupled to the support at first location and a second location.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of manufacturing a device to transmit an audio signal to a user. The user has an ear comprising an eardrum. A support is configured to fit the eardrum of the user. A transducer is positioned to couple to a first location of the support and a second location of the support. The first location is separated from the second location by at least about 1 mm. The support may be formed with a mold to fit the eardrum of the user.
The transducer may be affixed to the support with a first attachment structure at the first location and a second attachment structure at the second location.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises an elongate movable structure configured to move in response to a magnetic field. The first attachment structure is affixed to the elongate movable structure with an extension structure, for example a post, extending from the attachment structure to the elongate movable structure. The elongate movable structure may comprise at least one or a reed or an armature of a balanced armature transducer.
In many embodiments, a liquid is placed against the mold and solidifies to form the support. The transducer may be supported with the mold when the liquid solidifies. The transducer may comprise a balanced armature and the transducer may be supported with the mold when the liquid solidifies to balance the armature such that the armature is balanced when the support is placed on the eardrum of the user. The liquid may comprise at least one of a silicone, a hydrogel, or collagen.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises a balanced armature transducer optimized to drive a load of the support coupled to the eardrum. The balanced armature transducer may be optimized by optimizing at least one of a size of the balanced armature transducer, a geometry of the balanced armature transducer, an electrical impedance of the balanced armature transducer, materials from which the balanced armature transducer is made, ferrofluid disposed in a cavity between poles of a magnet of the transducer, a spring constant of a restoring member coupled to the armature of the balanced armature transducer to restore the armature to a neutral position, a number of turns of a wire of a coil wrapped around the armature of the balanced armature transducer, or a diameter of the wire of the coil wrapped around the armature of the balanced armature transducer.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit an audio signal to a user, in which the user has an ear comprising an eardrum and a malleus. The device comprises a transducer and a support. The transducer is configured to drive the eardrum. The support is configured for placement at least partially on the eardrum to support the transducer.
In many embodiments, the eardrum comprises an annulus and the support is configured for placement at least partially on the annulus of the eardrum to decrease occlusion.
In many embodiments, the support comprises a recess sized to decrease contact with a portion of the eardrum disposed along a portion of the malleus when the support is placed at least partially on the eardrum. The recess can be sized to decrease a user perceptible interference of the support with blood flow to the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the support is configured to couple the eardrum with a predetermined orientation to position the recess at least partially over a portion of the malleus.
In many embodiments, the support comprises an outer portion and the transducer is coupled to the outer portion to decrease occlusion, and the recess extends at least partially into the outer portion. The transducer may comprise a housing affixed to the outer portion and a vibratory structure. The vibratory structure may be disposed at least partially within the housing and extend inwardly away from the outer portion to couple to an inner portion of the eardrum. The inner portion may comprise the umbo.
In many embodiments, at least one of an elastic structure or a spring connected to the outer portion and the transducer to urge the transducer toward the eardrum and couple the transducer to the eardrum when the outer portion is coupled at least partially to the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the transducer is coupled to the outer portion away from the recess.
In many embodiments, the outer portion is configured to contact skin disposed over a bony portion of the ear canal.
In many embodiments, the outer portion comprises an O-ring sized to fit the along a periphery of the eardrum and wherein the O-ring comprises the recess.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises at least one electromagnetic energy receiver configured to receive electromagnetic energy and convert the electromagnetic energy to electrical energy to drive the transducer. The electromagnetic energy receiver can be affixed to the outer portion to decrease occlusion and coupled the transducer to transmit sound to the user in response to electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic energy may comprise light. The at least one electromagnetic energy receiver may comprise at least one photodetector affixed to the outer portion to decrease occlusion and coupled the transducer to transmit sound to the user in response to the light.
In many embodiments, at least one optical component is affixed to the support and oriented toward the at least one photodetector to at least one of refract, diffract or reflect light from the optical component toward the at least one photodetector. The optical component may comprise one or more of a lens, Fresnel lens, a refractive lens, a cylindrical lens, a diffractive lens, a diffractive optic, a reflective surface, a mirror, a prism, an array of lenses, an array of lenses, an array of cylindrical lens, an array of mirrors or an array of prisms.
In many embodiments, the support comprises an inner portion and the outer portion comprises an opening sized to receive the inner portion. The inner portion can be configured to couple to an inner portion of the eardrum, for example near the umbo, and the inner portion sized smaller than the opening to couple to the transducer through the opening.
In many embodiments, the support comprises an inner portion, and the outer portion comprises an opening sized to receive an elongate movable structure extending from the transducer to the second support to couple to the transducer to the second support through the opening. The inner portion is configured for placement over an inner portion of the eardrum to drive the eardrum. The inner portion may comprise the umbo.
In many embodiments, the transducer is coupled to the support at a location on the support such that the location is positioned away from a lateral process of the malleus or a bony part of the external ear canal when the support is placed on the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises a movable structure coupled to the support at an inner location and configured to drive the eardrum from the inner location in response to movement of the movable structure.
In many embodiments, the support is configured to extend over a portion of malleus along a first direction and extend along a second direction transverse to the second direction, and the support comprises a first length in the first direction and a second length in the second direction, the first length less than the second length. The support can extend to the recess in the first direction, and a portion of an outer boundary of the support may define the recess. The transducer may comprise a magnet affixed to the support to vibrate the support in response to a magnetic field.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises at least one of an electromagnetic balanced armature transducer, a piezoelectric transducer, a magnetostrictive transducer, a photostrictive transducer, an electrostatic transducer, a coil or a magnet.
In many embodiments, the transducer is electrically coupled to a amplifier circuitry with at least one electrical conductor extending between the transducer and the amplifier to couple the transducer to the amplifier. The device may comprise a module, and the module may comprise a microphone and the amplifier circuitry and a connector. The module can be sized to fit in the ear canal to couple to the amplifier circuitry to the transducer with the connector when the module is positioned in the ear canal. The module may be configured to disconnect from the connector such that the support is positioned in the ear canal at least partially against the eardrum when the module is removed.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of providing an audio device to a user, in which the user has an ear comprising an eardrum and a malleus. A support is provided, and the support has a transducer supported thereon and a recess sized to decrease contact with blood vessels of the eardrum. The support is placed at least partially on the eardrum, and the support is placed on the eardrum such that the recess aligned with the blood vessels of the eardrum.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit an audio signal to a user, in which the user has an ear comprising an eardrum. The device comprises a transducer configured to drive the eardrum, and a support comprising an outer portion and an inner portion. The outer portion comprises a stop configured to limit medial displacement of the support into the ear, and the inner portion is configured to couple the transducer to the eardrum.
In many embodiments, at least one structure is coupled to the transducer and the inner portion. The at least one structure can be configured to urge the inner portion toward the eardrum to couple the transducer to the eardrum when the stop is positioned against at least one of an outer portion of the eardrum or skin of the ear canal proximal to the outer portion of the eardrum.
In many embodiments, a module is configured to insert into the ear canal, in which the module comprises a microphone, a power supply and amplifier circuitry coupled to the microphone. The module may comprise a first connector configured to contact a second connector affixed to the support, so as to couple electrically the circuitry of the module with the transducer on the support, such that the module can be removed without the support and transducer when the support is coupled to the eardrum. Alternatively, the module may comprise the transducer, the stop and the support, and the support can be affixed to a distal end of the module.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit a sound to a user having an eardrum. The device comprises a support configured to couple to the eardrum, a first transducer and a second transducer. The first transducer is configured to couple at least an inner portion of the support to the eardrum. The second transducer is configured to vibrate the at least the inner portion of the support to transmit the sound when the at least the inner portion is coupled to the eardrum.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of transmitting a sound to a user having an eardrum. A support is provided to the user, and the support coupled to a first transducer and a second transducer. At least an inner portion of the support is coupled to the eardrum with the first transducer. The at least the inner portion of the support is vibrated with the second transducer to transmit the sound when the at least the inner portion is coupled to the eardrum.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit a sound to a user having an eardrum. The device comprises a support configured to couple to the eardrum. A transducer is coupled to the support, and a conformable structure is coupled the support and the transducer to transmit the sound to the user.
In many embodiments, the conformable structure is configured to decrease low frequency loading of the transducer when the support is coupled to the eardrum and to transmit substantially frequencies of the sound above about 1 kHz when the support is coupled to the eardrum.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of transmitting a sound to a user having an eardrum. The method comprises positioning a support on the eardrum to couple a transducer to the eardrum. A conformable structure is coupled the support and the transducer to transmit the sound to the user.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to transmit an audio signal to a user. The device comprises transducer means and support means coupled to the transducer means to vibrate the ear in response to the signal.
FIGS. 2C1 to 2C4 show views of the balanced armature transducer as in
FIG. 4A1 shows the coils as in
FIGS. 5A1, 5B1, and 5C1 show top views of the armature post end portions of
FIG. 8D1 shows the support of
FIG. 8D2 shows the support of
FIG. 8D3 shows a post comprising the at least one structure configured to urge the support toward the eardrum;
FIG. 8E1 shows a medial view of a support having an outer portion comprising an O-ring and a flange extending from the O-ring configured for placement at least partially over an outer portion of the eardrum comprising the annulus and an inner portion configured for placement over an inner portion of the eardrum to drive the eardrum with the inner portion;
FIG. 8E2 shows a side view of the assembly as in FIG. 8E1;
FIG. 9B1 shows a side view of the support as in
FIG. 9B2 shows a side view of the support as in
FIGS. 9C1 and 9C2 shows side and top views, respectively, of a support comprising at least one rigid structure coupled to a transducer with pivot coupling, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 9D1 shows transducer reed coupled to a support with a viscous material disposed therebetween, so as to inhibit low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer when the support is coupled to the eardrum, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 9D2 shows a transducer reed coupled to a support with a viscous liquid so as to inhibit low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer and occlusion when the support is coupled to the eardrum, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention;
Embodiments of the present invention can provide hearing devices which directly couple to at least one of the eardrum or the ossicles such that the user perceives sound with minimal occlusion and feedback, and with improved audio signal transmission. The systems, devices, and methods described herein may find application for hearing devices, for example open ear canal hearing aides. Although specific reference is made to hearing aid systems, embodiments of the present invention can be used in any application in which an audio signal is received, for example, optically or electromagnetically, and converted into a mechanical output.
As used herein, the umbo of the eardrum encompasses a central portion of the eardrum coupled to the malleus and that extends most medially along the ear canal.
Output transducer assembly 100 may have at least a portion of the device coupled to eardrum TM. Output transducer assembly 100 may comprises an output transducer 130 positioned on support and configured to vibrate in response to audio signals. Based on received signals, output transducer assembly 100 can vibrate the eardrum TM in opposing first direction 111 and second direction 113 to produce a sound output. The received signals will typically be based on an original sound input and may be from a light source such as an LED or a laser diode, an electromagnet, an RF source, or the like. To produce a mechanical vibration on the eardrum TM, output transducer assembly 100 may comprise a coil responsive to the electromagnet, a magnetostrictive element, a photostrictive element, a piezoelectric element, an electromagnetic balanced armature, or the like. When properly coupled to the subject's hearing transduction pathway, the mechanical vibrations caused by audio signal transmission device can induce neural impulses in the subject which can be interpreted by the subject as the original sound input.
Hearing system 10 may comprise an input transducer assembly, for example, a completely-in-the-canal unit or a behind-the-ear unit 20. Behind-the-ear unit 20 may comprise many components of system 10 such as a speech processor, battery, wireless transmission circuitry, and the like. Output transducer assembly 100 will typically be configured to receive signals from the input transducer assembly, for example, the behind-the-ear unit 20. Behind-the-ear unit 20 may comprise many components as described in U.S. Pat. Pub. Nos. 2007/0100197, entitled “Output transducers for hearing systems;” and 2006/0251278, entitled “Hearing system having improved high frequency response.” The input transducer assembly may be located at least partially behind the pinna P or other sites such as in pinna P or entirely within ear canal EC. The input transducer assembly can receive a sound input, for example an audio sound. With hearing aids for hearing impaired individuals, the input can be ambient sound. The input transducer assembly comprises an input transducer, for example, a microphone 22 which may be positioned in many locations such as behind the ear, if appropriate. Microphone 22 is shown positioned within the ear canal EC near its opening to detect spatial localization cues from the ambient sound. The input transducer assembly can include a suitable amplifier or other electronic interface. The input received by the input transducer assembly may comprise an electronic sound signal from a sound producing or receiving device, such as a telephone, a cellular telephone, a Bluetooth connection, a radio, a digital audio unit, and the like.
Hearing system 10 can include a signal output source 12. The signal output source 12 can produce an output based on a sound input. The output source 12 may comprise a light source such as an LED or a laser diode, an electromagnet, an RF source, or the like. The signal output source can produce an output based on the sound input. Output transducer assembly 130 comprising output transducer 130 can receive the output source and can produce mechanical vibrations in response. Output transducer 130 may comprise a coil responsive to the electromagnet, a magnetostrictive element, a photostrictive element, a piezoelectric element, or the like. When properly coupled to the subject's hearing transducer pathway, the mechanical vibrations caused by output transducer 130 can induce neural impulses in the subject which can be interpreted by the subject as the original sound input.
The transducer 130 is coupled to the support 120 at a first location 131 and at a second location 133. The first location 131 may correspond to the location of the umbo UM and be spaced away from the second location 133 by at least about 1 mm. As shown in
Transducer 130 comprises a center of mass CM. Transducer 130 can be positioned on support 130 such that the transducer center of mass CM is positioned on the support away from the umbo when the support is placed on the eardrum TM. The transducer can extend away from the umbo such that the center of mass CM is located away from the umbo. For example, the center of mass CM can be positioned way from the umbo such that the center of mass is aligned with a handle of the malleus. The transducer may extend away from the umbo toward the wall of the ear canal and away from the malleus such that the center of mass is positioned between the umbo and the wall of the ear canal away from the malleus when the support is placed against the ear canal.
Alternatively to positioning the second location 133 on the support so as to correspond to the lateral process LP, the second location of the support may correspond to a location of the eardrum away from the lateral process LP, so as to decrease interference from blood flow. Blood vessels can extend within eardrum TM along the malleus toward the umbo. The second location can be positioned to correspond to portions of the eardrum away from the blood vessels that extend along the malleus toward the umbo. For example, the second location 133 can be positioned on the support to extend along the tympanic membrane in an anterior posterior direction, a posterior anterior direction, or an inferior superior direction. The transducer may comprises an elongate dimension extending between the first location and the second location, and the elongate dimension of the transducer can be within a range from about 2 mm to about 5 mm.
The transducer 130 can extend away from the umbo UM and away from visible blood vessels of the eardrum so as to decrease interference from the blood vessels that may extend along the malleus.
Output transducer assembly 100 can be very energy efficient. The transducer 130 and the support 120 may be configured to provide a sound output of at least 80 dB (SPL) with no more than 5% distortion at 10 kHz with no more than about 1 mW of electrical power input to the transducer 130. The transducer 130 and the support 120 may be configured to provide the sound output of at least 80 dB (SPL) with no more than 5% distortion over a range from about 100 Hz to about 10 kHz with the no more than about 1 mW of electrical power input to the transducer 130. These amounts of efficiency can extend the battery life of the output transducer assembly 100 when the output transducer assembly is coupled to an input transducer assembly, for example, at least one of optically coupled or electromagnetically coupled or electrically coupled, as described herein.
Referring now to
The balanced armature 250 can be precisely centered or “balanced” in the magnetic field of the permanent magnet 245. As shown in
As shown in
When coupled to the support 120 on the eardrum TM with the reed post 285 corresponding to the first location 131 and the portion 242 of the casing 240 corresponding to the second location 133, the transducer 130 may drive the eardrum by causing movement of reed post 285 in opposite directions 290. Such movement may cause a movement of portion 242 of casing 240 in directions 292, which will typically be in directions opposite of directions 290. Movement of portion 242 can be less than the movement of the reed post 285. For example, movement of portion 242 may be no more than about 75% of the movement of the reed post 285 when the transducer 130 drives the eardrum.
As shown in
FIGS. 2C1 to 2C4 show views of the balanced armature transducer as in
As shown by
The transducer 130 may comprise other transducers such a coil responsive to the electromagnet, a magenetostrictve element, a photostrictive element, a piezoelectric element. These transducers may still be rigidly fixed within a casing and have at least one of a reed or post extending out. The combined mass of the transducer 130, support 120, post 185, casing 40, and input element 270 may comprise a combined mass. The components can be selected and arranged so as to minimize or decrease occlusion and provide comfort to the user. In some embodiments, the combined mass of transducer 130, support 120, post 185, casing 40, and input element 270 may comprise no more than about 120 mg, for example when the support is configured to extend to the bony part BP to support the transducer. The effective combined mass of 120 mg with such embodiments can correspond to a mass of no more than about 60 mg, or less, centered on the umbo. The combined mass of transducer 130, support 120, post 185, casing 40, and input element 270 may comprise no more than about 70 mg, for example when the transducer is positioned on the support such that the second location corresponds to the lateral process LP, such that the combined mass corresponds to a mass of no more than about 35 mg, or less, centered on the umbo. The combined mass of transducer 130, support 120, post 185, casing 40, and input element 270 may comprise no more than about 80 mg, for example when the transducer is positioned on the support such that the second location corresponds to the lateral process LP, such that the combined mass corresponds to a mass of no more than about 40 mg, or less, centered on the umbo. For example, the combined mass may comprise about 40 mg and correspond to about 20 mg centered on the umbo.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Alternatively or in combination with the post and/or tuning structure, the support may comprise a conformable material to decrease or inhibit pre-loading of the transducer against the eardrum. For example a conformable sponge material such as a viscoelastic memory foam can be coupled to the support and post and/or tuning structure so as to decrease or inhibit static pre-loading of the transducer against the eardrum. Alternatively or in combination, the conformable sponge material may comprise a medical grade silicone foam. The conformable sponge material may absorb static preloading of the transducer post without changing substantially the dynamic frequency response characteristics in the audible hearing range, for example with no more than about a 3 dB change in the dynamic frequency response. The conformable structure to decrease or inhibit low frequency loading, for example static loading, may increase user comfort, for example when the support engages the eardrum and the conformable structure changes shape from a first unloaded configuration to a second statically loaded configuration so as to decrease or inhibit pressure on the eardrum. For example, the end portion 287 of the reed post 285 may comprise the conformable sponge material to couple to the support 120 at the first location 131. The support 120 may also comprise the conformable sponge material, for example.
As shown in
The input element 270, as described above, can be rigidly coupled to housing 240 of the assembly 100, such that the input is supported with the housing 240. Alternatively or in combination, the input element may be affixed to the support.
The support 120 can be configured in many ways to couple the transducer 130 to the eardrum. The support 120 may be configured with single molded component comprising an inner portion and an outer portion, each configured to contact the eardrum, as described above. Alternatively, support 120 may comprise two or more components, each configured contact the eardrum. Support 120 may comprise an outer component 830 and an inner component 840. Outer component 830 may comprise recess 810 and may be sized to the ear of the user. For example, outer component 830 may comprise O-ring sized to the eardrum TM of the user. In some embodiments, the sized O-ring can be cut to form recess 810 such that the O-ring comprises a C-ring. The transducer 130 can be affixed to the outer component 830 at second location 133 such that second location 133 corresponds to a portion of the annulus TMA of the eardrum TM. Inner component 840 may be size to fit within the outer component 830. For example outer component 830 may comprise an opening 832 having a dimension across, and inner component 840 may comprise a dimension across that is smaller than the dimension of the opening such that the inner component 840 fits inside the opening. Transducer 130 can be coupled to the inner component 840 comprising first location 131 with structures such as a reed 280 coupled to a post 285 of a balanced armature transducer, as described above. The post 285 may extend through the opening 832 to couple transducer 130 to inner component 840 of support 120. The post and reed may comprise many structures, for example rigid structures. Alternatively or in combination, post 285 may comprise a filament having a cross-section sized to move the eardrum TM in response to movement of reed 280.
The input element 270, as described above, can be rigidly coupled to housing 240 of the assembly 100, such that the input is supported with the housing 240. Alternatively or in combination, the input element may be affixed to the support.
FIG. 8D1 shows the support of
FIG. 8D2 shows the support of
The at least one structure 820 may comprise many structures configured to couple the transducer to the eardrum. For example, the at least one structure 820 may comprise a spring or an elastic material or a combination thereof. For example the spring may comprise a leaf spring or a coil spring. The at least one structure 820 may comprise an elastic material, such as silicone elastomer configured to stretch and pull the transducer toward the eardrum when the support is positioned on the eardrum. The at least one structure may comprise parallel struts configured to extend across the support to opposing sides of the support. The transducer 130 may pivot about second location 133 to couple to the eardrum. Alternatively or in combination, post 285 may comprise the at least one structure 820, as shown in FIG. 8D3. The at least one structure 820 may comprise one or more of the tuning structures, as described above.
The above structures of support 120 can be configured in many ways to couple effectively the transducer 130 to the ear of the user. The mass of the balanced armature transducer may comprise a center of mass that can be positioned away from the umbo as described above. The force exerted by the at least one structure 820 can be determined based on empirical studies so as to inhibit occlusion and substantially couple the transducer to the eardrum. For example, the mass of the transducer and force of the at least one structure can be determined so as to match substantially the impedance of the transducer coupled to the eardrum to the impedance of the eardrum, such that energy transmission can be efficient. The force of the at least one structure can be configured so as to couple the transducer to the eardrum, for example without fluid disposed between the support and the eardrum at the inner location of the support, although fluid may be used.
FIG. 8E1 shows a medial view assembly 100 comprising support 120 having an outer portion 830 comprising an O-ring 830R and a flange 850 extending from the O-ring. The outer portion 830 is configured for placement at least partially over an outer portion of the eardrum comprising the annulus TMA. The support 120 comprises inner portion 840 configured for placement over an inner portion of the eardrum to drive the eardrum with the inner portion. The O-ring 830R can be sized to the ear of the user, for example selected from a plurality of sizes of O-rings and fit to a mold of the user. The flange may comprise many materials suitable for support 120 as described above, and may be coupled to the ear with a fluid comprising a liquid as described above. For example, the flange material comprising a liquid such as silicone may be deposited on the mold to correspond to outer portion 830, and the O-ring positioned on the liquid material and cured thereon. The transducer can be affixed to one or more of the O-ring and flange at second location 133, such that inner portion 840 corresponds to a desired location of the inner portion of the eardrum based on the mold. The second location 133 may correspond to a portion of the annulus away from the malleus ML and the vessels VE of the eardrum TM extending along the malleus. The support material can be deposited on the mold to correspond to inner portion 840 and cured with the post 285 extending thereto. Work in relation to embodiments suggests that positioning the second end 133 away from the malleus may be sufficient to decrease or inhibit substantially user perceptible noise related through blood vessels VE, and it is contemplated that in at least some embodiments the support may not comprise the recess. The outer portion may optionally be formed with recess 810 with material positioned on the mold to form the recess 810 as a concavity extending laterally away from the umbo. Alternatively or in combination, the outer portion 830 comprising O-ring 830R can be cut at a location corresponding to the malleus and vessels VE so as to form a C-ring. Based on the teachings described herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art can conduct empirical studies on patients to determine the position of second location 133 and whether a recess is helpful and the location of the recess when present.
The input element 270, as described above, can be rigidly coupled to housing 240 of the assembly 100, such that the input is supported with the housing 240. Alternatively or in combination, the input element may be affixed to the support.
FIG. 8E2 shows a side view of the assembly as in FIG. 8E1. The transducer 830 can be coupled to the outer portion 830 and sized such that inner portion 840 corresponds to an intended inner portion of the eardrum. For example, inner portion 830 may correspond to the umbo. Alternatively, inner portion 830 may correspond to an inner portion of the eardrum TM separated from the umbo. Based on the teachings described herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art can determines suitable configurations of inner portion 840 to couple to the inner portion of the eardrum so as to couple to eardrum TM with decreased interference from blood vessels extending along the malleus ML.
The assemblies and supports shown in
The input element 270, as described above, can be rigidly coupled to housing 240 of the assembly 100, such that the input is supported with the housing 240. Alternatively or in combination, the input element may be affixed to the support.
The at least one rigid structure 826 can be coupled to the transducer in many ways to couple the transducer to the eardrum. The at least one structure 820 may comprise the rigid support structure 826, such that the first end 822 is coupled to the transducer 130. The at least one of the resilient member or spring may be coupled to the at least one rigid structure to urge the transducer toward the eardrum, as described above.
Alternatively to or in combination with at least one rigid structure 826, transducer 130 can be driven toward the tympanic membrane TM with a transducer 828, for example a piezoelectric bender, when the assembly receives energy to drive the transducer 130.
FIG. 9B1 shows a side view of the support as in
FIG. 9B2 shows a side view of the support as in
FIGS. 9C1 and 9C2 shows side and top views, respectively, of a support comprising at least one rigid structure 826 coupled to a transducer with pivoting coupling and at least one structure 820 to couple the transducer to the eardrum. The at least one structure 820 comprises a first end 822 and a second end 824. First end 822 can be affixed to transducer 130 and second end 824 can be affixed to the support such that the at least one structure urges the transducer 130 toward the eardrum TM to couple the transducer to the eardrum. Transducer 130 may comprise the balanced armature transducer 230 having a housing 240 as described above. The transducer 830 can move relative to the at least one rigid structure, for example with a pivot movement 133P, so as to couple the transducer to the umbo in response to urging of at least one structure 820.
FIG. 9D1 shows transducer reed coupled to a support with a viscous material disposed therebetween, so as to inhibit low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer when the support is coupled to the eardrum. The reed 280 comprising a rigid material extends to the post 285, as noted above. The viscous material can be configured in many ways so as to couple the reed to the support 131. For example, the post 285 may comprise the viscous material, for example a viscoelastic material such as memory foam. Alternatively or in combination, the viscous material may comprise a viscous fluid, for example a viscous liquid 910 disposed within a container 920, and the post 285 may extend into the container so as to couple to the support 131 with the liquid. The viscous liquid 920 may comprise many liquids and can comprises a viscosity at least as much as the viscosity of water. For example, water comprises a dynamic viscosity of about 0.89 cP (centi-Poise), and the viscosity can be greater, for example at least about 10 cP, or at least about 100 cP. Suitable viscous liquids include castor oil with a viscosity of about 985 cP, ethylene glycol with a viscosity of about 16 cP, glycerol with a viscosity of about 1500 cP, olive oil with a viscosity of about 81 cP, and pitch with a viscosity of about 2.3×10″ cP. The viscosity can be within a range from about 1 cP to about 2.3×10″ cP. The viscosity of the liquid can be selected depending on design parameters such as one or more of the inside diameter of the container, the outside diameter of the post, the clearance between the inside diameter of the container and the outside diameter of the post.
FIG. 9D2 shows a transducer reed 280 coupled to the support with the viscous liquid 910 so as to inhibit low frequency loading, for example static loading, of the transducer and occlusion when the support is coupled to the eardrum. The post can be affixed to flange having openings 185H formed thereon so as to pass liquid 910 with flow 910F through the holes when the support 131 is coupled to the eardrum TM. The openings in the flange can be formed in many ways, for example with one or more of holes drilled in the flange, an annular opening formed in the flange, or an annular flange supported with spokes.
In many embodiments, transducer 860 comprises at least one photodetector, for example photodetector 470 as described above. Transducer 860 can be affixed to the support at a location corresponding to the skin SK disposed over the bony process BP, so as to minimize or decrease occlusion when the support is positioned over the bony process BP. The at least one photodetector may comprise one or more photodetectors as described in U.S. Pat. App. No. 61/177,047, filed May 11, 2009, entitled “Optical Electro-Mechanical Hearing Devices With Combined Power and Signal Architectures”; and U.S. Pat. App. No. 61/139,520, filed Dec. 19, 2008, entitled “Optical Electro-Mechanical Hearing Devices with Separate Power and Signal Components”. These applications describe beneficial methods and apparatus for optically coupling light to a hearing assembly that can be incorporated in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. For example, the electromagnetic energy EM may comprise a first wavelength of light and a second wavelength of light, and the at least one photo detector may comprise two photo detectors in which a first photodetector is sensitive to a first wavelength of light and the second photodetector is sensitive to a second wavelength of light. Each photo detector can be coupled to the transducer with opposite polarity, such that the transducer is driven in a first direction in response to the first wavelength and a second direction in response to the second wavelength, in which the first direction may be opposite the second direction. Alternatively, the at least one photodetector may comprise a single photodetector, and the single photodetector configured to receive power and signal information from light. Active circuitry may be coupled to the at least one detector and transducer to drive the transducer, and the active circuitry may be supported with the skin SK disposed over the bony process BP.
An optical component 862 can be affixed to the support to couple light energy to the at least one photodetector. The optical component may comprise one or more of a lens, a refractive lens, a diffractive lens, a prism, a Fresnel lens, or a mirror. The optical component is positioned on the support 120 so as to at least one of refract, diffract or reflect the light signal onto the at least one photodetector. In many embodiments, the optical component positioned on the support in a predetermined orientation so as to efficiently couple light transmitted along the ear canal EC to the at least one photodetector. Alternatively or in combination, the optical component can be mounted adjustably, for example one or more of pivoting or bending.
Connector 894 and connector 880 can be configured in many ways such that circuitry 892 can efficiently drive transducer 130 of assembly 100. For example, the connectors by provide direct electrical contact of electrical conductors such that the amplifier circuitry 892 is coupled to transducer 130 with an electrical connection. Work in relation to embodiments suggests that direct electrical contact and direct coupling to the eardrum TM as described above can be more efficient than conventional acoustic hearing aids with a speaker positioned in the ear canal, for example about ten times as efficient, such that the lifetime of a battery can exceed six months. Alternatively to the direct electrical connection, connector 894 and connector 880 may provide electromagnetic inductive coupling, for example with a core of the module 890 positioned within coil of assembly 100. The module 890 may also be coupled to assembly 100 optically, as described above. The connector 880 may comprise a component of the input element 270.
The energy storage device 898 may comprise a rechargeable energy storage device that can be recharged in many ways. For example, the energy storage device may be charged with a plug in connector coupled to a super capacitor for rapid charging. Alternatively, the energy storage device may be charged with an inductive coil or with a photodetector as described above. The photodetector detector may be positioned on a proximal end of the module 890 such that the photodetector is exposed to light entering the ear canal EC. The photodetector can be coupled to the energy storage device 898 so as to charge the energy storage device. The photodetector may comprise many detectors, for example black silicone as described above. The rechargeable energy storage device can be provided merely for convenience, as the energy storage device 898 may comprise batteries that the user can replace when module 890 is removed from ear canal EC.
Experimental Models, Measurements and Simulations.
Laser Doppler vibration measurements of balanced armature output transducers were used with a mathematical model of the umbo to mathematically model the loaded response of the output transducers on the human ear. Exemplary balanced armature output transducers that were measured included an FK-Flat output transducer and a WBFK-Flat output transducer (wide-band), which are commercially available through Knowles Electronics of Itasca, Ill. The response of the output transducers were mathematically modeled as if the output transducer were supported on the malleus of the ear while the armature or reed of the output transducer exerted a force on the umbo of the ear through a reed post as described above.
The WBFK-Flat output transducer has a smaller size and would fit with a wider range of anatomy. The WBFK-Flat output transducer, however, may not have an output performance as good as the FK-Flat output transducer. The force generated per unit current was 2.55 N/A for the FK-Flat output transducer and 0.98 N/A for the WBFK-Flat output transducer.
Table 1 below shows exemplary parameters for the mathematical modeling of the loaded response of the FK-Flat output transducer.
The 17 mg equivalent fixed load and the 6 mg moving load were calculated from a model which can be described as a pinned cantilever with a spring opposite the pin. For an inertial mass of 48 mg, a reed length of 4.2 mm, and a reed post height of 2.2 mm, the equivalent M L2 load can be given by the equation:
Meg is the mass at the center of the transducer, and x is the acceleration of the output transducer.
Based on the above equation, for the 48 mg mass, the equivalent load for the model is 17 mg, which can significantly decrease perceived occlusion. In addition to the offset 48 mg mass, the transducer assembly also comprises the 4 mg support and the approximately 2 mg reed post.
Previous testing of output transducers placed on the eardrum had suggested that a mass of 50 mg or more placed on the eardrum would result in significant occlusion. With an output transducer offset away from the umbo and modeled as a cantilever, the effective occlusion for a 48 mg mass that is offset from the umbo is only about 17 mg. Therefore, occlusion is substantially minimized or decreased with the assembly comprising components positioned on the support for placement away from the umbo when the support is placed on the eardrum.
Studies are also contemplated to optimize balanced armature transducers, such as the FK-Flat and WBFK-Flat output transducers, and others for use with a support coupled directly to a patient's eardrum. For example, a balanced armature transducer may be optimized to drive a load of a support coupled to the eardrum of a patient. An empirical number of patients, for example 10, may be tested with various designs of balanced armature transducers to determine optimum working ranges of various design parameters. Further, bench studies can be conducted and measurements made to further optimize the design. Such parameters to be optimized can include a size of the balanced armature transducer, its geometry, electrical impedance, the materials from which the balanced armature transducer is made, ferrofluid disposed in a cavity between poles of a magnet of the transducer, a spring constant of a restoring member, the number of turns of a wire of a coil wrapped around the armature of the balanced armature transducer, or the diameter of the wire. The armature may also comprise an opposing mass on an end of the armature opposite the support, such that the armature is balanced when coupled to the support configured for placement against the ear of the patient. The output mechanical impedance of the balanced armature transducer can be matched to an input mechanical impedance of the support, so as to optimize mechanical energy transmission from the balanced armature to the eardrum.
Experimental studies have been conducted with people and supports comprising balanced armature transducers in accordance with some embodiments as described above. With the embodiment tested, the balanced armature transducer was affixed to the support at a first location corresponding to the umbo and a second location toward at least about 4 mm away from the umbo. In at least one instance experiments the support comprising a balanced armature transducer became decoupled from the eardrum. Although fluid had been placed on the eardrum to couple the support and the transducer to the eardrum, the support decoupled. The user noticed that the slight and tolerable occlusion that was normally present did not occur. This empirical data supports the hypothesis that reduced occlusion can result with transducer supported on an outer portion of the support away from the umbo. This data also indicates that a structure can be provided on the support to urge the transducer toward the eardrum. For example, the structure may comprise an elastic structure, or a resilient structure such as a spring. This urging of the transducer toward the eardrum can improve coupling of the transducer to the eardrum and may decrease substantially, even eliminate, the use of fluid to couple the support to the eardrum.
Experimental studies have been conducted with people and supports comprising balanced armature transducers in accordance with some embodiments as described above. In at least some instances experiments conducted supports extending over the malleus and contacting the eardrum near the periphery of the eardrum have shown that the user can perceive the pulse of the heart beat, for example with the second end of the transducer positioned over the lateral process. In at least some instances attaching the second end of the transducer to the support at a location of the support away from the malleus has substantially decreased this sensation. Further studies with the recess to decrease contact with tissue comprising vascular structures as described above are contemplated. Alternatively or in combination, the first end of the transducer can be coupled to the support at a location corresponding to an inner portion of the eardrum away from the umbo, which can receive at least some blood with pulsatile flow. Based on the teachings described herein, one of ordinary skill in the art can conduct additional empirical studies to determine the shape of the recess and attachment locations of the transducer to the support so as to inhibit this user perceived sound of the heartbeat.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting in scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/425,684 filed Feb. 6, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/491,572 filed Sep. 19, 2014 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,749,758 on Aug. 29, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/069,262 filed Mar. 22, 2011 and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,858,419 on Oct. 14, 2014, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/057719 filed Sep. 22, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Nos. 61/139,526 filed Dec. 19, 2008 and entitled “Balanced Armature Devices and Methods for Hearing;” 61/217,801 filed on Jun. 3, 2009, 61/099,087 filed Sep. 22, 2008 and entitled “Transducer Devices and Methods for Hearing,” and 61/109,785 filed Oct. 30, 2008 and entitled “Transducer Devices and Methods for Hearing,” the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. R44DC008499-02A1). The Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2763334 | Starkey | Sep 1956 | A |
3209082 | McCarrell et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3229049 | Goldberg | Jan 1966 | A |
3440314 | Frisch | Apr 1969 | A |
3449768 | James | Jun 1969 | A |
3526949 | Frank | Sep 1970 | A |
3549818 | Turner | Dec 1970 | A |
3585416 | Mellen | Jun 1971 | A |
3594514 | Wingrove | Jul 1971 | A |
3710399 | Hurst | Jan 1973 | A |
3712962 | Epley | Jan 1973 | A |
3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3808179 | Gaylord | Apr 1974 | A |
3870832 | Fredrickson | Mar 1975 | A |
3882285 | Nunley et al. | May 1975 | A |
3965430 | Brandt | Jun 1976 | A |
3985977 | Beaty et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4002897 | Kleinman et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4031318 | Pitre | Jun 1977 | A |
4061972 | Burgess | Dec 1977 | A |
4075042 | Das | Feb 1978 | A |
4098277 | Mendell | Jul 1978 | A |
4109116 | Victoreen | Aug 1978 | A |
4120570 | Gaylord | Oct 1978 | A |
4207441 | Chouard et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4248899 | Lyon et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4252440 | Frosch et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4281419 | Treace | Aug 1981 | A |
4303772 | Novicky | Dec 1981 | A |
4319359 | Wolf | Mar 1982 | A |
4334315 | Ono et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4334321 | Edelman | Jun 1982 | A |
4338929 | Lundin et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4339954 | Anson et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4357497 | Hochmair et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4380689 | Giannetti | Apr 1983 | A |
4428377 | Zollner et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4524294 | Brody | Jun 1985 | A |
4540761 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4556122 | Goode | Dec 1985 | A |
4592087 | Killion et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4611598 | Hortmann et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
4641377 | Rush et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652414 | Schlaegel | Mar 1987 | A |
4654554 | Kishi | Mar 1987 | A |
4689819 | Killion et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4696287 | Hortmann et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4729366 | Schaefer | Mar 1988 | A |
4741339 | Harrison et al. | May 1988 | A |
4742499 | Butler | May 1988 | A |
4756312 | Epley | Jul 1988 | A |
4759070 | Voroba et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4766607 | Feldman | Aug 1988 | A |
4774933 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4776322 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4782818 | Mori | Nov 1988 | A |
4800884 | Heide et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800982 | Carlson | Jan 1989 | A |
4817607 | Tatge | Apr 1989 | A |
4840178 | Heide et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845755 | Busch et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4865035 | Mori | Sep 1989 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4918745 | Hutchison | Apr 1990 | A |
4932405 | Peeters et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936305 | Ashtiani et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944301 | Widin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4948855 | Novicky | Aug 1990 | A |
4957478 | Maniglia | Sep 1990 | A |
4963963 | Dorman | Oct 1990 | A |
4982434 | Lenhardt et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4999819 | Newnham et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003608 | Carlson | Mar 1991 | A |
5012520 | Steeger | Apr 1991 | A |
5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
5015225 | Hough et al. | May 1991 | A |
5031219 | Ward et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5061282 | Jacobs | Oct 1991 | A |
5066091 | Stoy et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068902 | Ward | Nov 1991 | A |
5094108 | Kim et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117461 | Moseley | May 1992 | A |
5142186 | Cross et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163957 | Sade et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167235 | Seacord et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201007 | Ward et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5220612 | Tibbetts et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5259032 | Perkins | Nov 1993 | A |
5272757 | Scofield et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276910 | Buchele | Jan 1994 | A |
5277694 | Leysieffer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282858 | Bisch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298692 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5338287 | Miller et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5360388 | Spindel et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5378933 | Pfannenmueller et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402496 | Soli et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411467 | Hortmann et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425104 | Shennib | Jun 1995 | A |
5440082 | Claes | Aug 1995 | A |
5440237 | Brown et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455994 | Termeer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
5531787 | Lesinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531954 | Heide et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5535282 | Luca | Jul 1996 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5558618 | Maniglia | Sep 1996 | A |
5571148 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5572594 | Devoe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5606621 | Reiter et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5692059 | Kruger | Nov 1997 | A |
5699809 | Combs et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707338 | Adams et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715321 | Andrea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721783 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
5722411 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729077 | Newnham et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740258 | Goodwin-Johansson | Apr 1998 | A |
5742692 | Garcia et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749912 | Zhang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762583 | Adams et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772575 | Lesinski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774259 | Saitoh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782744 | Money | Jul 1998 | A |
5788711 | Lehner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795287 | Ball et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797834 | Goode | Aug 1998 | A |
5800336 | Ball et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804109 | Perkins | Sep 1998 | A |
5804907 | Park et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814095 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824022 | Zilberman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825122 | Givargizov et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836863 | Bushek et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842967 | Kroll | Dec 1998 | A |
5851199 | Peerless et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857958 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859916 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868682 | Combs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879283 | Adams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888187 | Jaeger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897486 | Ball et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899847 | Adams et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900274 | Chatterjee et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906635 | Maniglia | May 1999 | A |
5913815 | Ball et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922017 | Bredberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922077 | Espy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935170 | Haakansson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940519 | Kuo | Aug 1999 | A |
5949895 | Ball et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951601 | Lesinski et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984859 | Lesinski | Nov 1999 | A |
5987146 | Pluvinage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001129 | Bushek et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005955 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011984 | Van Antwerp et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024717 | Ball et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038480 | Hrdlicka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045528 | Arenberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050933 | Bushek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068589 | Neukermans | May 2000 | A |
6068590 | Brisken | May 2000 | A |
6072884 | Kates | Jun 2000 | A |
6084975 | Perkins | Jul 2000 | A |
6093144 | Jaeger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6135612 | Clore | Oct 2000 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139488 | Ball | Oct 2000 | A |
6153966 | Neukermans | Nov 2000 | A |
6168948 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174278 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175637 | Fujihira et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181801 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190305 | Ball et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190306 | Kennedy | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208445 | Reime | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216040 | Harrison | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217508 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219427 | Kates et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222302 | Imada et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222927 | Feng et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240192 | Brennan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241767 | Stennert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259951 | Kuzma et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261224 | Adams et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264603 | Kennedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277148 | Dormer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312959 | Datskos | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339648 | McIntosh et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342035 | Kroll et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354990 | Juneau et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6366863 | Bye et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374143 | Berrang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385363 | Rajic et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387039 | Moses | May 2002 | B1 |
6390971 | Adams et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393130 | Stonikas et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6422991 | Jaeger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432248 | Popp et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434246 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434247 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436028 | Dormer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438244 | Juneau et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445799 | Taenzer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473512 | Juneau et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475134 | Ball et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491622 | Kasic, II et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491644 | Vujanic et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491722 | Kroll et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493453 | Glendon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493454 | Loi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498858 | Kates | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507758 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519376 | Biagi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523985 | Hamanaka et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536530 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537200 | Leysieffer et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6547715 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549633 | Westermann | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549635 | Gebert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554761 | Puria et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575894 | Leysieffer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592513 | Kroll et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603860 | Taenzer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620110 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626822 | Jaeger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629922 | Puria et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631196 | Taenzer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643378 | Schumaier | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663575 | Leysieffer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668062 | Luo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676592 | Ball et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681022 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6695943 | Juneau et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697674 | Leysieffer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726618 | Miller | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726718 | Carlyle et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727789 | Tibbetts et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728024 | Ribak | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735318 | Cho | May 2004 | B2 |
6754358 | Boesen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754359 | Svean et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754537 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785394 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792114 | Kates et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801629 | Brimhall et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829363 | Sacha | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831986 | Kates | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837857 | Stirnemann | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842647 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6888949 | Vanden Berghe et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6900926 | Ribak | May 2005 | B2 |
6912289 | Vonlanthen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920340 | Laderman | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931231 | Griffin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6940989 | Shennib | Sep 2005 | B1 |
D512979 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
6975402 | Bisson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978159 | Feng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7020297 | Fang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024010 | Saunders et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043037 | Lichtblau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050675 | Zhou et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050876 | Fu et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7057256 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058182 | Kates | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058188 | Allred | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072475 | Denap et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076076 | Bauman | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095981 | Voroba et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7167572 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174026 | Niederdrank et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179238 | Hissong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181034 | Armstrong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203331 | Boesen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239069 | Cho | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245732 | Jorgensen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255457 | Ducharme et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266208 | Charvin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289639 | Abel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313245 | Shennib | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7315211 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7322930 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7349741 | Maltan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354792 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376563 | Leysieffer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7390689 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394909 | Widmer et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7421087 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424122 | Ryan | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444877 | Li et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7547275 | Cho et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7630646 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645877 | Gmeiner et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668325 | Puria et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7747295 | Choi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7809150 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826632 | Von Buol et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853033 | Maltan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867160 | Pluvinage et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883535 | Cantin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7983435 | Moses | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8090134 | Takigawa et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116494 | Rass | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128551 | Jolly | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157730 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8197461 | Arenberg et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8204786 | Leboeuf et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8233651 | Haller | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8251903 | Leboeuf et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295505 | Weinans et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295523 | Fay et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8320601 | Takigawa et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320982 | Leboeuf et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340310 | Ambrose et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340335 | Shennib | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8391527 | Feucht et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8396239 | Fay et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401212 | Puria et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401214 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8506473 | Puria | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512242 | Leboeuf et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526651 | Van et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526652 | Ambrose et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526971 | Giniger et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545383 | Wenzel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600089 | Wenzel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647270 | Leboeuf et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8652040 | Leboeuf et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8684922 | Tran | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696054 | Crum | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696541 | Pluvinage et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700111 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702607 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8715152 | Puria et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8715153 | Puria et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8715154 | Perkins et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8761423 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8787609 | Perkins et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788002 | Leboeuf et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817998 | Inoue | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824715 | Fay et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845705 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8855323 | Kroman | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8858419 | Puria et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8885860 | Djalilian et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886269 | Leboeuf et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8888701 | Leboeuf et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8923941 | Leboeuf et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8929965 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8929966 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8934952 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8942776 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961415 | Leboeuf et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8986187 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989830 | Leboeuf et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9044180 | Leboeuf et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9049528 | Fay et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055379 | Puria et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9131312 | Leboeuf et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9154891 | Puria et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9211069 | Larsen et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226083 | Puria et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9277335 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289135 | Leboeuf et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289175 | Leboeuf et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9301696 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9314167 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9392377 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9427191 | Leboeuf et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9497556 | Kaltenbacher et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9521962 | Leboeuf | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9524092 | Ren et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9538921 | Leboeuf et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9544700 | Puria et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9591409 | Puria et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9749758 | Puria et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9750462 | Leboeuf et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788785 | Leboeuf | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9788794 | Leboeuf et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9794653 | Aumer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801552 | Romesburg et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9808204 | Leboeuf et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9949045 | Kure et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9964672 | Phair et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
1000388 | Stephanou et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
1020604 | Kaltenbacher et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20010003788 | Ball et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007050 | Adelman | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010024507 | Boesen | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027342 | Dormer | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010029313 | Kennedy | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043708 | Brimhall | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053871 | Zilberman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055405 | Cho | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020012438 | Leysieffer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025055 | Stonikas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029070 | Leysieffer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020030871 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035309 | Leysieffer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048374 | Soli et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086715 | Sahagen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020172350 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183587 | Dormer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021903 | Shlenker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055311 | Neukermans et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064746 | Rader et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081803 | Petilli et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097178 | Roberson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125602 | Sokolich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142841 | Wiegand | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030208099 | Ball | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208888 | Fearing et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220536 | Hissong | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019294 | Stirnemann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093040 | Boylston et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121291 | Knapp et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158157 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165742 | Shennib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166495 | Greinwald et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167377 | Schafer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184732 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190734 | Kates | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202339 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202340 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208333 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040234089 | Rembrand et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234092 | Wada et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236416 | Falotico | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240691 | Grafenberg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018859 | Buchholz | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020873 | Berrang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036639 | Bachler et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038498 | Dubrow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050088435 | Geng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101830 | Easter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111683 | Chabries et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117765 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163333 | Abel et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190939 | Fretz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196005 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226446 | Luo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267549 | Della Santina et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271870 | Jackson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288739 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015155 | Charvin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023908 | Perkins et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058573 | Neisz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062420 | Araki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074159 | Lu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075175 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060107744 | Li et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129210 | Cantin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161227 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161255 | Zarowski et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177079 | Baekgaard Jensen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177082 | Solomito et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183965 | Kasic et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189841 | Pluvinage et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231914 | Carey, III | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233398 | Husung | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237126 | Guffrey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247735 | Honert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251278 | Puria et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256989 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278245 | Gan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030990 | Fischer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036377 | Stirnemann | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076913 | Schanz | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083078 | Easter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100197 | Perkins et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127748 | Carlile et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127752 | Armstrong | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127766 | Combest | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135870 | Shanks et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161848 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191673 | Ball et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201713 | Fang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206825 | Thomasson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223755 | Salvetti et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225776 | Fritsch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236704 | Carr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250119 | Tyler et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251082 | Milojevic et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286429 | Grafenberg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021518 | Hochmair et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051623 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054509 | Berman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063228 | Mejia et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063231 | Juneau et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064918 | Jolly | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077198 | Webb et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080089292 | Kitazoe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107292 | Kornagel | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123866 | Rule et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130927 | Theverapperuma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188707 | Bernard et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080298600 | Poe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080300703 | Widmer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016553 | Ho et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090023976 | Cho et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043149 | Abel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076581 | Gibson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092271 | Fay et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097681 | Puria et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131742 | Cho et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141919 | Spitaels et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090149697 | Steinhardt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157143 | Edler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175474 | Salvetti et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090246627 | Park | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253951 | Ball et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262966 | Vestergaard et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281367 | Cho et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310805 | Petroff | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316922 | Merks et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034409 | Fay et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036488 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048982 | Puria et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100085176 | Flick | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103404 | Remke et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111315 | Kroman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114190 | Bendett et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145135 | Ball et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152527 | Puria | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171369 | Baarman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172507 | Merks | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177918 | Keady et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202645 | Puria et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222639 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100260364 | Merks | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272299 | Van Schuylenbergh et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290653 | Wiggins et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312040 | Puria et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110069852 | Arndt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077453 | Pluvinage et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112462 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116666 | Dittberner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125222 | Perkins et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130622 | Ilberg et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142274 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144414 | Spearman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144719 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152601 | Puria et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152602 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152603 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152976 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164771 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182453 | Van Hal et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110221391 | Won et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249845 | Kates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249847 | Salvetti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258839 | Probst | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271965 | Parkins et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120008807 | Gran | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014546 | Puria et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120038881 | Amirparviz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039493 | Rucker et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120114157 | Arndt et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140967 | Aubert et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120217087 | Ambrose et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236524 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130004004 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034258 | Lin | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083938 | Bakalos et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130089227 | Kates | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130230204 | Monahan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130287239 | Fay et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303835 | Koskowich | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308782 | Dittberner et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308807 | Burns | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315428 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343584 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343585 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343587 | Naylor et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003640 | Puria et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140056453 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140153761 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169603 | Sacha et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140254856 | Blick et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275734 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286514 | Pluvinage et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288356 | Van Vlem | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288358 | Puria et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296620 | Puria et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321657 | Stirnemann | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140379874 | Starr et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150021568 | Gong et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023540 | Fay et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150031941 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150124985 | Kim et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150201269 | Dahl et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222978 | Murozaki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245131 | Facteau et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150271609 | Puria | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150358743 | Killion | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008176 | Goldstein | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029132 | Freed et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160064814 | Jang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160066101 | Puria et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094043 | Hao et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160150331 | Wenzel | May 2016 | A1 |
20160183017 | Rucker et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160277854 | Puria et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160302011 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309265 | Pluvinage et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309266 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170040012 | Goldstein | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170095167 | Facteau et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170095202 | Facteau et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134866 | Puria et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170150275 | Puria et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170195801 | Rucker et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170195804 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170195806 | Atamaniuk et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170195809 | Teran et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180077503 | Shaquer et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180077504 | Shaquer et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180167750 | Freed et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180213331 | Rucker et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180213335 | Puria et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180262846 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180317026 | Puria | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190069097 | Perkins et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004301961 | Feb 2005 | AU |
2242545 | Sep 2009 | CA |
1176731 | Mar 1998 | CN |
101459868 | Jun 2009 | CN |
2044870 | Mar 1972 | DE |
3243850 | May 1984 | DE |
3508830 | Sep 1986 | DE |
0092822 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0242038 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0291325 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0296092 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0242038 | May 1989 | EP |
0296092 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0352954 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0291325 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0352954 | Aug 1991 | EP |
1035753 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1435757 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1845919 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1955407 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1845919 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2272520 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2301262 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2752030 | Jul 2014 | EP |
3101519 | Dec 2016 | EP |
2425502 | Jan 2017 | EP |
2907294 | May 2017 | EP |
3183814 | Jun 2017 | EP |
3094067 | Oct 2017 | EP |
2455820 | Nov 1980 | FR |
2085694 | Apr 1982 | GB |
S60154800 | Aug 1985 | JP |
S621726 | Jan 1987 | JP |
S63252174 | Oct 1988 | JP |
S6443252 | Feb 1989 | JP |
H09327098 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2000504913 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2004187953 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004193908 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005516505 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006060833 | Mar 2006 | JP |
100624445 | Sep 2006 | KR |
WO-9209181 | May 1992 | WO |
WO-9501678 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9621334 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-9736457 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9745074 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9806236 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9903146 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9915111 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-0022875 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0022875 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0150815 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0158206 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0176059 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0158206 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-0239874 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-0239874 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03030772 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03063542 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03063542 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004010733 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2005015952 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107320 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006014915 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006037156 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006039146 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006042298 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006071210 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006075169 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006075175 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006118819 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006042298 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007023164 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2009046329 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009047370 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009049320 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009056167 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2009062142 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2009047370 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009125903 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2009145842 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009146151 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009155358 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009155361 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009155385 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010033932 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010033933 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010077781 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010147935 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2010148345 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2011005500 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2012088187 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012149970 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2013016336 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2016011044 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO-2016045709 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2017045700 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017059218 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017059240 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO-2017116791 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2017116865 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2018048794 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO-2018081121 | May 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Galbraith et al. A wide-band efficient inductive transdermal power and data link with coupling insensitive gain IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. Apr. 1987;34(4):265-75. |
Kiessling, et al. Occlusion Effect of Earmolds with Different Venting Systems. J Am Acad Audiol. Apr. 2005;16(4):237-49. |
School of Physics Sydney, Australia. Acoustic Compliance, Inertance and Impedance. 1-6. (2018). http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/compliance-inertance-impedance.htm. |
Wikipedia. Inductive Coupling. 1-2 (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_coupling. |
Wikipedia. Pulse-density Coupling. 1-4 (2017). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-density_modulation. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,236 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2018. |
Vinge. Wireless Energy Transfer by Resonant Inductive Coupling. Master of Science Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. 1-83 (2015). |
Wikipedia. Resonant Inductive Coupling. 1-11 (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_inductive_coupling#cite_note-13. |
Dictionary.com's (via American Heritage Medical Dictionary) online dictionary definition of ‘percutaneous’. Accessed on Jun. 3, 2013. 2 pages. |
Merriam-Webster's online dictionary definition of ‘percutaneous’. Accessed on Jun. 3, 2013. 3 pages. |
Hakansson, et al. Percutaneous vs. transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conduction (Abstract). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Apr. 1990;102(4):339-44. |
Mah. Fundamentals of photovoltaic materials. National Solar Power Research Institute. Dec. 21, 1998, 3-9. |
Robles, et al. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev. Jul. 2001;81(3):1305-52. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,684 Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2018. |
Web Books Publishing, “The Ear,” accessed online Jan. 22, 2013, available online Nov. 2, 2007 at http://www.web-books.com/eLibrary/Medicine/Physiology/Ear/Ear.htm. |
Wiki. Sliding Bias Variant 1, Dynamic Hearing (2015). |
Dundas et al. The Earlens Light-Driven Hearing Aid: Top 10 questions and answers. Hearing Review. 2018;25(2):36-39. |
Khaleghi et al. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am. Mar. 2017;141(3):1683. |
Khaleghi et al. Attenuating the feedback pressure of a light-activated hearing device to allows microphone placement at the ear canal entrance. IHCON 2016, International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Tahoe City, CA, Aug. 2016. |
Khaleghi et al. Mechano-Electro-Magnetic Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer for a Contact Hearing Aid. Proc. MoH 2017, Mechanics of Hearing workshop, Brock University, Jun. 2017. |
Khaleghi et al. Multiphysics Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer used in a Contact Hearing Device. ARO 2017, 40th ARO MidWinter Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Feb. 2017. |
Levy et al. Light-driven contact hearing aid: a removable direct-drive hearing device option for mild to severe sensorineural hearing impairment. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Tahoe City, CA, Jul. 2017. 1 page. |
McElveen et al. Overcoming High-Frequency Limitations of Air Conduction Hearing Devices Using a Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid. Poster presentation at The Triological Society, 120th Annual Meeting at COSM, Apr. 28, 2017; San Diego, CA. |
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,236. |
Asbeck, et al. Scaling Hard Vertical Surfaces with Compliant Microspine Arrays, The International Journal of Robotics Research 2006; 25; 1165-79. |
Atasoy [Paper] Opto-acoustic Imaging. for BYM504E Biomedical Imaging Systems class at ITU, downloaded from the Internet www2.itu.edu.td—cilesiz/courses/BYM504- 2005-OA504041413.pdf, 14 pages. |
Athanassiou, et al. Laser controlled photomechanical actuation of photochromic polymers Microsystems. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2003; 5:245-251. |
Autumn, et al. Dynamics of geckos running vertically, The Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 260-272, (2006). |
Autumn, et al., Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae, www.pnas.orgycgidoiy10.1073ypnas.192252799 (2002). |
Ayatollahi, et al. Design and Modeling of Micromachined Condenser MEMS Loudspeaker using Permanent Magnet Neodymium-Iron-Boron (Nd—Fe—B). IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, 2006. ICSE '06, Oct. 29 2006-Dec. 1 2006; 160-166. |
Baer, et al. Effects of Low Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise for People With and Without Dead Regions at High Frequencies. J. Acost. Soc. Am 112 (3), pt. 1, (Sep. 2002), pp. 1133-1144. |
Best, et al. The influence of high frequencies on speech localization. Abstract 981 (Feb. 24, 2003) from www.aro.org/abstracts/abstracts.html. |
Birch, et al. Microengineered systems for the hearing impaired. IEE Colloquium on Medical Applications of Microengineering, Jan. 31, 1996; pp. 2/1-2/5. |
Boedts. Tympanic epithelial migration, Clinical Otolaryngology 1978, 3, 249-253. |
Burkhard, et al. Anthropometric Manikin for Acoustic Research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 58, No. 1, (Jul. 1975), pp. 214-222. |
Camacho-Lopez, et al. Fast Liquid Crystal Elastomer Swims Into the Dark, Electronic Liquid Crystal Communications. Nov. 26, 2003; 9 pages total. |
Carlile, et al. Frequency bandwidth and multi-talker environments. Audio Engineering Society Convention 120. Audio Engineering Society, May 20-23, 2006. Paris, France. 118: 8 pages. |
Carlile, et al. Spatialisation of talkers and the segregation of concurrent speech. Abstract 1264 (Feb. 24, 2004) from www.aro.org/abstracts/abstracts.html. |
Cheng, et al. A Silicon Microspeaker for Hearing Instruments. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 2004; 14(7):859-866. |
Datskos, et al. Photoinduced and thermal stress in silicon microcantilevers. Applied Physics Letters. Oct. 19, 1998; 73(16):2319-2321. |
Decraemer, et al. A method for determining three-dimensional vibration in the ear. Hearing Res., 77:19-37 (1994). |
Ear. Downloaded from the Internet. Accessed Jun. 17, 2008. 4 pages. URL:<http://wwwmgs.bionet.nsc.ru/mgs/gnw/trrd/thesaurus/Se/ear.html>. |
European search report and opinion dated Feb. 6, 2013 for EP Application No. 09767670.4. |
“European search report and search opinion dated Mar. 4, 2015 for EP Application No. 09815345.5.”. |
“European search report and search opinion dated Dec. 3, 2013 for EP Application No. 09836787.3.”. |
Fay. Cat eardrum mechanics. Ph.D. thesis. Disseration submitted to Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Standford University. May 2001; 210 pages total. |
Fay, et al. Cat eardrum response mechanics. Mechanics and Computation Division. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Standford University. 2002; 10 pages total. |
Fay, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired. Otol Neurotol. Jul. 2013;34(5):912-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827de4b1. |
Fay, et al. The discordant eardrum, PNAS, Dec. 26, 2006, vol. 103, No. 52, p. 19743-19748. |
Fletcher. Effects of Distortion on the Individual Speech Sounds. Chapter 18, ASA Edition of Speech and Hearing in Communication, Acoust Soc.of Am. (republished in 1995) pp. 415-423. |
Freyman, et al. Spatial Release from Informational Masking in Speech Recognition. J. Acost. Soc. Am., vol. 109, No. 5, pt. 1, (May 2001); 2112-2122. |
Freyman, et al. The Role of Perceived Spatial Separation in the Unmasking of Speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 106, No. 6, (Dec. 1999); 3578-3588. |
Fritsch, et al. EarLens transducer behavior in high-field strength MRI scanners. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar. 2009;140(3):426-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.016. |
Gantz, et al. Broad Spectrum Amplification with a Light Driven Hearing System. Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, 2016 (Chicago). |
Gantz, et al. Light Driven Hearing Aid: A Multi-Center Clinical Study. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2016 (San Diego). |
Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology Journal, 2016 (in review). |
Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology. Copyright 2016. 7 pages. |
Ge, et al., Carbon nanotube-based synthetic gecko tapes, p. 10792-10795, PNAS, Jun. 26, 2007, vol. 104, No. 26. |
Gennum, GA3280 Preliminary Data Sheet: Voyageur TD Open Platform DSP System for Ultra Low Audio Processing, downloaded from the Internet:<<http://www.sounddesigntechnologies.com/products/pdf/37601DOC.pdf>>, Oct. 2006; 17 pages. |
Gobin, et al. Comments on the physical basis of the active materials concept. Proc. SPIE 2003; 4512:84-92. |
Gorb, et al. Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects, Integr. Comp_ Biol., 42:1127-1139 (2002). |
Hato, et al. Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiol. Neurootol., 8:140-152 (Jan. 30, 2003). |
Headphones. Wikipedia Entry. Downloaded from the Internet. Accessed Oct. 27, 2008. 7 pages. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headphones>. |
Hofman, et al. Relearning Sound Localization With New Ears. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, No. 5, (Sep. 1998); 417-421. |
International Preliminary report on patentability dated Jun. 21, 2011 for PCT/US2009/067703. |
International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 21, 2010 for PCT/US2009/067703. |
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 23, 2009 for PCT/US2009/047685. |
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 2, 2009 for PCT/US2009/057719. |
Izzo, et al. Laser Stimulation of Auditory Neurons: Effect of Shorter Pulse Duration and Penetration Depth. Biophys J. Apr. 15, 2008;94(8):3159-3166. |
Izzo, et al. Laser Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve. Lasers Surg Med. Sep. 2006;38(8):745-753. |
Izzo, et al. Selectivity of Neural Stimulation in the Auditory System: A Comparison of Optic and Electric Stimuli. J Biomed Opt. Mar.-Apr. 2007;12(2):021008. |
Jian, et al. A 0.6 V, 1.66 mW energy harvester and audio driver for tympanic membrane transducer with wirelessly optical signal and power transfer. InCircuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Jun. 1, 2014. 874-7. IEEE. |
Jin, et al. Speech Localization. J. Audio Eng. Soc. convention paper, presented at the AES 112th Convention, Munich, Germany, May 10-13, 2002, 13 pages total. |
Khaleghi, et al. Characterization of Ear-Canal Feedback Pressure due to Umbo-Drive Forces: Finite-Element vs. Circuit Models. ARO Midwinter Meeting 2016, (San Diego). |
Killion, et al. The case of the missing dots: Al and SNR loss. The Hearing Journal, 1998. 51(5), 32-47. |
Killion. Myths About Hearing Noise and Directional Microphones. The Hearing Review. Feb. 2004; 11(2):14, 16, 18, 19, 72 & 73. |
Killion. SNR loss: I can hear what people say but I can't understand them. The Hearing Review, 1997; 4(12):8-14. |
Lee, et al. A Novel Opto-Electromagnetic Actuator Coupled to the tympanic Membrane. J Biomech. Dec. 5, 2008;41(16):3515-8. Epub Nov. 7, 2008. |
Lee, et al. The optimal magnetic force for a novel actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane: a finite element analysis. Biomedical engineering: applications, basis and communications. 2007; 19(3):171-177. |
Levy, et al. Characterization of the available feedback gain margin at two device microphone locations, in the fossa triangularis and Behind the Ear, for the light-based contact hearing device. Acoustical Society of America (ASA) meeting, 2013 (San Francisco). |
Levy, et al. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech. Ear Hear. Sep.-Oct. 2015;36(5):e214-24. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000161. |
Lezal. Chalcogenide glasses—survey and progress. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. Mar. 2003; 5(1):23-34. |
Makino, et al. Epithelial migration in the healing process of tympanic membrane perforations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990; 247: 352-355. |
Makino, et al., Epithelial migration on the tympanic membrane and external canal, Arch Otorhinolaryngol (1986) 243:39-42. |
Markoff. Intuition + Money: An Aha Moment. New York Times Oct. 11, 2008, p. BU4, 3 pages total. |
Martin, et al. Utility of Monaural Spectral Cues is Enhanced in the Presence of Cues to Sound-Source Lateral Angle. JARO. 2004; 5:80-89. |
Michaels, et al., Auditory Epithelial Migration on the Human Tympanic Membrane: II. The Existence of Two Discrete Migratory Pathways and Their Embryologic Correlates, The American Journal of Anatomy 189:189-200 (1990). |
Moore, et al. Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am. Jul. 2003;114(1):408-19. |
Moore, et al. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. Dec. 2008;29(6):907-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818246f6. |
Moore. Loudness perception and intensity resolution. Cochlear Hearing Loss, Chapter 4, pp. 90-115, Whurr Publishers Ltd., London (1998). |
Murphy M, Aksak B, Sitti M. Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. J Adhesion Sci Technol, vol. 21, No. 12-13, p. 1281-1296, 2007. |
Murugasu, et al. Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data. Otol Neurotol. Jul. 2005; 2694):572-582. |
Musicant, et al. Direction-Dependent Spectral Properties of Cat External Ear: New Data and Cross-Species Comparisons. J. Acostic. Soc. Am, May 10-13, 2002, vol. 87, No. 2, (Feb. 1990), pp. 757-781. |
National Semiconductor, LM4673 Boomer: Filterless, 2.65W, Mono, Class D Audio Power Amplifier, [Data Sheet] downloaded from the Internet:<<http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM4673.pdf>>; Nov. 1, 2007; 24 pages. |
Nishihara, et al. Effect of changes in mass on middle ear function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov. 1993;109(5):889-910. |
“Notice of allowance dated Mar. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,746.”. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,572. |
“Notice of allowance dated May 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/678,889.”. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,262. |
“Notice of allowance dated Aug. 21, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,100.”. |
O'Connor, et al. Middle ear Cavity and Ear Canal Pressure-Driven Stapes Velocity Responses in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones. J Acoust Soc Am. Sep. 2006;120(3):1517-28. |
Office action dated Jan. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,100. |
Office action dated May 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,262. |
Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,572. |
“Office action dated Aug. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,282.”. |
“Office action dated Nov. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,282.”. |
“Office action dated Nov. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,746.”. |
Office action dated Dec. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/678,889. |
Office action dated Dec. 31, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/069,262. |
Park, et al. Design and analysis of a microelectromagnetic vibration transducer used as an implantable middle ear hearing aid. J. Micromech. Microeng. vol. 12 (2002), pp. 505-511. |
Perkins, et al. Light-based Contact Hearing Device: Characterization of available Feedback Gain Margin at two device microphone locations. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2013 (Vancouver). |
Perkins, et al. The EarLens Photonic Transducer: Extended bandwidth. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2011 (San Francisco). |
Perkins, et al. The EarLens System: New sound transduction methods. Hear Res. Feb. 2, 2010; 10 pages total. |
Perkins, R. Earlens tympanic contact transducer: a new method of sound transduction to the human ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun. 1996;114(6):720-8. |
Poosanaas, et al. Influence of sample thickness on the performance of photostrictive ceramics, J. App. Phys. Aug. 1, 1998; 84(3):1508-1512. |
Puria et al. A gear in the middle ear. ARO Denver CO, 2007b. |
Puria, et al. Cues above 4 kilohertz can improve spatially separated speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011, 129, 2384. |
Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth above 4 kHz improves speech understanding in the presence of masking speech. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). |
Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth provides the brain what it needs to improve hearing in noise. First international conference on cognitive hearing science for communication, 2011 (Linkoping, Sweden). |
Puria, et al. Hearing Restoration: Improved Multi-talker Speech Understanding. 5th International Symposium on Middle Ear Mechanics in Research and Otology (MEMRO), Jun. 2009 (Stanford University). |
Puria, et al. Imaging, Physiology and Biomechanics of the middle ear: Towards understating the functional consequences of anatomy. Stanford Mechanics and Computation Symposium, 2005, ed Fong J. |
Puria, et al. Malleus-to-footplate ossicular reconstruction prosthesis positioning: cochleovestibular pressure optimization. Otol Nerotol. May 2005; 2693):368-379. |
Puria, et al. Measurements and model of the cat middle ear: Evidence of tympanic membrane acoustic delay. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104(6):3463-3481 (Dec. 1998). |
Puria, et al., Mechano-Acoustical Transformations in A. Basbaum et al., eds., The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference, v3, p. 165-202, Academic Press (2008). |
Puria, et al. Middle Ear Morphometry From Cadaveric Temporal Bone MicroCT Imaging. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium, Zurich, Switzerland, Jul. 27-30, 2006, Middle Ear Mechanics in Research and Otology, pp. 259-268. |
Puria, et al. Sound-Pressure Measurements in The Cochlear Vestibule of Human-Cadaver Ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1997; 101 (5-1): 2754-2770. |
Puria, et al. Temporal-Bone Measurements of the Maximum Equivalent Pressure Output and Maximum Stable Gain of a Light-Driven Hearing System That Mechanically Stimulates the Umbo. Otol Neurotol. Feb. 2016;37(2):160-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000941. |
Puria, et al. The EarLens Photonic Hearing Aid. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). |
Puria, et al. The Effects of bandwidth and microphone location on understanding of masked speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. International Conference for Hearing Aid Research (IHCON) meeting, 2012 (Tahoe City). |
Puria, et al. Tympanic-membrane and malleus-incus-complex co-adaptations for high-frequency hearing in mammals. Hear Res. May 2010;263(1-2):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.013. Epub Oct. 28, 2009. |
Puria. Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. May 2003;113(5):2773-89. |
Puria, S. Middle Ear Hearing Devices. Chapter 10. Part of the series Springer Handbook of Auditory Research pp. 273-308. Date: Feb. 9, 2013. |
Qu, et al. Carbon Nanotube Arrays with Strong Shear Binding-On and Easy Normal Lifting-Off, Oct. 10, 2008 vol. 322 Science. 238-242. |
Roush. SiOnyx Brings “Black Silicon” into the Light; Material Could Upend Solar, Imaging Industries. Xconomy, Oct. 12, 2008, retrieved from the Internet: www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/10/12/sionyx-brings-black-silicon-into-the-light-material-could-upend-solar-imaging-industries> 4 pages total. |
R.P. Jackson, C. Chlebicki, T.B. Krasieva, R. Zalpuri, W.J. Triffo, S. Puria, “Multiphoton and Transmission Electron Microscopy of Collagen in Ex Vivo Tympanic Membranes,” Biomedcal Computation at STandford, Oct. 2008. |
Rubinstein. How Cochlear Implants Encode Speech, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct. 2004;12(5):444-8; retrieved from the Internet: www.ohsu.edu/nod/documents/week3/Rubenstein.pdf. |
Sekaric, et al. Nanomechanical resonant structures as tunable passive modulators. App. Phys. Lett. Nov. 2003; 80(19):3617-3619. |
Shaw. Transformation of Sound Pressure Level From the Free Field to the Eardrum in the Horizontal Plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 56, No. 6, (Dec. 1974), 1848-1861. |
Shih. Shape and displacement control of beams with various boundary conditions via photostrictive optical actuators. Proc. IMECE. Nov. 2003; 1-10. |
Song, et al. The development of a non-surgical direct drive hearing device with a wireless actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane. Applied Acoustics. Dec. 31, 2013;74(12):1511-8. |
Sound Design Technologies,—Voyager TDTM Open Platform Dsp System for Ultra Low Power Audio Processing—GA3280 Data Sheet. Oct. 2007; retrieved from the Internet:<<http://www.sounddes.com/pdf/37601DOC.pdf>>, 15 page total. |
Spolenak, et al. Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2005; 461:305-319. |
Stenfelt, et al. Bone-Conducted Sound: Physiological and Clinical Aspects. Otology & Neurotology, Nov. 2005; 26 (6):1245-1261. |
Struck, et al. Comparison of Real-world Bandwidth in Hearing Aids vs Earlens Light-driven Hearing Aid System. The Hearing Review. TechTopic: EarLens. Hearingreview.com. Mar. 14, 2017. pp. 24-28. |
Stuchlik, et al. Micro-Nano Actuators Driven by Polarized Light. IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Techn. Mar. 2004; 151(2):131-136. |
Suski, et al. Optically activated ZnO/Si02/Si cantilever beams. Sensors and Actuators A (Physical), 0 (nr: 24). 2003; 221-225. |
Takagi, et al. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Piezoelectric PLZT Powder. KONA. 2003; 51(21):234-241. |
Thakoor, et al. Optical microactuation in piezoceramics. Proc. SPIE. Jul. 1998; 3328:376-391. |
The Scientist and Engineers Guide to Digital Signal Processing, copyright 01997-1998 by Steven W. Smith, available online at www.DSPguide.com. |
Thompson. Tutorial on microphone technologies for directional hearing aids. Hearing Journal. Nov. 2003; 56(11):14-16,18, 20-21. |
Tzou, et al. Smart Materials, Precision Sensors/Actuators, Smart Structures, and Structronic Systems. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2004; 11:367-393. |
Uchino, et al. Photostricitve actuators. Ferroelectrics. 2001; 258:147-158. |
Vickers, et al. Effects of Low-Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Quiet for People With and Without Dead Regions at High Frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Aug. 2001; 110(2):1164-1175. |
Vinikman-Pinhasi, et al. Piezoelectric and Piezooptic Effects in Porous Silicon. Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 2006; 88(11): 11905-111906. |
Wang, et al. Preliminary Assessment of Remote Photoelectric Excitation of an Actuator for a Hearing Implant. Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th nnual Conference, Shanghai, China. Sep. 1-4, 2005; 6233-6234. |
Wiener, et al. On the Sound Pressure Transformation by the Head and Auditory Meatus of the Cat. Acta Otolaryngol. Mar. 1966; 61(3):255-269. |
Wightman, et al. Monaural Sound Localization Revisited. J Acoust Soc Am. Feb. 1997;101(2):1050-1063. |
Yao, et al. Adhesion and sliding response of a biologically inspired fibrillar surface: experimental observations, J. R. Soc. Interface (2008) 5, 723-733 doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1225 Published online Oct. 30, 2007. |
Yao, et al. Maximum strength for intermolecular adhesion of nanospheres at an optimal size. J. R. Soc. Interface doi:10.10981rsif.2008.0066 Published online 2008. |
Yi, et al. Piezoelectric Microspeaker with Compressive Nitride Diaphragm. The Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2002; 260-263. |
Yu, et al. Photomechanics: Directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature. Sep. 2003; 425:145. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,208, filed Sep. 15, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/706,236, filed Sep. 15, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,398, filed Sep. 28, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,995, filed Nov. 6, 2017. |
Edinger, J.R. High-Quality Audio Amplifier With Automatic Bias Control. Audio Engineering; Jun. 1947; pp. 7-9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180020291 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61139526 | Dec 2008 | US | |
61099087 | Sep 2008 | US | |
61109785 | Oct 2008 | US | |
61217801 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15425684 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 15706181 | US | |
Parent | 14491572 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15425684 | US | |
Parent | 13069262 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14491572 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2009/057719 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13069262 | US |