1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to medical devices and methods, and more particularly to methods and gynecological devices for mobilization of the female uterus prior to hysterectomy or other procedures.
Hysterectomy involves total or partial removal of the body and cervix of the uterus. Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. By the age of sixty, nearly one in three American women will have undergone hysterectomy, and it is estimated that over a half million women undergo hysterectomy each year in the United States alone. The costs related to performing hysterectomies cost the United States healthcare system billions of dollars annually.
A majority of hysterectomies are performed by an open abdominal surgical procedure as surgeons have the most experience with this approach. An open abdominal surgical route allows for removal of a large sized uterus or other diseased organs or tissue, such as the ovaries, fallopian tubes, endometriosis, adenomyosis, and the like. However, open abdominal hysterectomy suffers from several drawbacks. The surgical procedure is often lengthy and complicated, requiring longer anesthesia periods and the increased risk of postoperative complications. Patients also suffer from prolonged recovery periods, pain and discomfort, and large visible scarring on the abdomen. Further, increased costs are associated with an open abdominal approach, such as prolonged hospital stays.
Two less invasive alternatives to performing hysterectomies are vaginal and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A vaginal hysterectomy, which is of particular interest to the present invention, involves a surgical approach through the vaginal tubular tract to gain access directly to the uterus. Hysterectomies may also be performed with a range of laparoscopic assistance, often using a laparoscopic port for viewing only where all other steps are completed vaginally. Hysterectomies may be completely performed laparoscopically, typically requiring mobilization of the uterus and subsequent removal of the uterus through a laparoscopic port.
A problem common to both transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies is the dissection of the uterus from the surrounding blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments which attach the uterus to surrounding tissue structures. In transvaginal procedures, it is often necessary to advance surgical blades, electrocautery elements or other dissection tools in a blind fashion in an effort to cut and seal the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. Even with laparoscopic viewing, such procedures for freeing the uterus from surrounding tissue structures are difficult.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved methods and apparatus for performing transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies. In particular, it would be desirable to provide improved methods and apparatus for mobilizing the uterus by dissecting the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments surrounding the uterus to free the uterus from surrounding tissue structures. Such improved methods and apparatus would desirably reduce procedure times and complexity, and result in improved patient outcomes while simultaneously reducing costs of the procedure. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described hereinbelow.
2. Description of the Background Art
Electrosurgical cutting loops are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,069. Methods and systems for organ resection are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,123,701, licensed to the assignee of the present application and incorporated herein by reference. Bipolar forceps for coagulating blood vessels are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,463. The use of radio frequency energy to necrose the endothelial lining of the uterus is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,948. The following U.S. Patents may also be relevant to the present invention: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,920,021; 3,845,771; 4,041,952; 4,671,274; 4,972,846; 5,037,379; 5,078,736; 5,151,102; 5,178,618; 5,207,691; 5,217,030; 5,267,998; 5,269,780; 5,269,782; 5,281,216; 5,282,799; 5,290,287; 5,295,990; 5,300,087; 5,324,289; 5,330,471; 5,336,229; 5,336,237; 5,342,381; 5,352,223; 5,352,235; 5,356,408; 5,391,166; 5,395,369; 5,396,900; 5,403,312; 5,417,687; 5,423,814; 5,445,638; 5,456,684; 5,458,598; 5,462,546; 5,482,054; 5,484,435; 5,484,436; 5,496,312; 5,496,317; 5,514,134; 5,531,744; 5,540,684; 5,540,685; 5,542,945; 5,549,606; 5,558,100; 5,558,671; 5,569,243; 5,573,535; 5,578,052; 5,599,350; 5,603,711; 5,611,803; 5,624,452; 5,637,110; 5,637,111; 5,653,692; 5,658,281; 5,665,085; 5,665,100; 5,667,526; 5,669,907; 5,674,184; 5,674,220; 5,681,282; 5,683,385; 5,683,388; 5,688,270; 5,693,051; 5,697,949; 5,700,261; 5,702,390; 5,707,369; 5,709,680; 5,713,896; 5,718,703; 5,733,283; 5,735,289; 5,735,848; 5,735,849; 5,741,285; 5,743,906; 5,755,717; 5,833,690; 6,743,229. The subject matter of this application is related to the following copending, commonly assigned applications: No. 60/680,937 (docket 025741-000100US); Ser. No. 11/137,970 (docket 025741-000300US); and Ser. No. 11/173,478 (docket 025741-000500US), the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention provides apparatus and improved methods for mobilizing a uterus prior to a hysterectomy procedure, usually a transvaginal or a laparoscopic procedure. By “mobilizing,” it is meant that the uterus is freed from surrounding tissue structures by severing and preferably cauterizing surrounding blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. In the exemplary embodiments, severing and cauterizing is performed by a pair of opposed continuous loop electrodes which are introduced through the vaginal wall near the cervix and thereafter manipulated to surround the uterus. The continuous loop electrodes are then clamped together generally about the medial plane of the uterus so that the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments are held therebetween. Radiofrequency or other energy is then applied through the continuous loop electrodes to sever and cauterize the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. After the uterus has been thus mobilized, the uterus may be withdrawn by conventional transvaginal or laparoscopic techniques. The methods and apparatus of the present invention would also be useful for mobilizing the uterus prior to conventional open laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures, but the advantages are more pronounced when performing transvaginal and laparoscopic procedures.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, an electrocautery device comprises a first continuous loop electrode and a second continuous loop electrode. The first and second loop electrodes are configured to be introduced to circumscribe the uterus, typically over the medial plane, and to clamp the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments which extend laterally from the uterus to surrounding tissue structures. Once the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments have been clamped, radiofrequency or other energy may be delivered through the electrodes to sever and cauterize the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. The radiofrequency is preferably bipolar but could in some instances also be monopolar. It may be desirable to alternately deliver both a cutting current and a coagulation current in order to first sever the blood vessels and thereafter to cauterize the severed blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments.
Apparatus according to the present invention will usually further comprise a coupling structure which anchors the loop electrodes, typically at one end, in a symmetric relationship. Usually, the coupling structure anchors the loop electrodes with an offset between the electrodes in the range from 0 cm to 5 cm, typically from 1 cm to 2 cm. Most often, the coupling structure will comprise a collar, where the electrodes may be fixed to the collar or may alternatively be slidable within apertures or channels in the collar to permit advancement of the electrodes relative to the collar.
Each of the continuous loop electrodes will usually be planar and have a generally oval shape with a length (when deployed) in the range from 20 cm to 50 cm, preferably from 20 cm to 30 cm, and a maximum width (when deployed) in the range from 5 cm to 25 cm. The loop geometry will preferably be oval, generally corresponding to the oval or pear shape of the uterus.
The loop electrodes will usually be insulated over those portions which are not intended to contact the blood vessels, tubular structures, ligaments, and other tissue which is being severed and cauterized. Thus, a proximal portion of each loop electrode will usually be insulated over those regions which will lie within the collar or other coupling structure when the loop electrodes are deployed. The back surfaces or sides of the loop electrodes, i.e. those which are facing away from the clamping side of the electrode, will also usually be insulated in order to avoid heating and damaging other tissues.
Each of the continuous loop electrodes will typically comprise or be formed from a resilient wire, where each resilient wire electrode is preferably laterally collapsible but relatively stiff in the anterior-posterior direction. This allows the loop electrodes to be laterally collapsed while being introduced through incisions in the vaginal wall prior to deployment around the uterus. The electrodes will then self-expand or otherwise be deployed to assume their shape which corresponds to the outer periphery of the uterus prior to clamping with the opposed electrode.
Preferred resilient wire geometries are asymmetric with a cross-section having an anterior-posterior dimension which is greater than a lateral dimension. Such asymmetric resilient wires may have a rectangular, oval, or other asymmetric cross-section. Alternatively or additionally, the resilient wire loop electrodes may be reinforced to increase stiffness in the anterior-posterior direction, either by electrically conductive or electrically non-conductive materials. In some instances, all or a portion of the insulation could also contribute to the desired stiffness in the anterior-posterior direction.
In a second aspect of the present invention, methods for mobilizing a uterus comprise positioning a first continuous loop electrode over lateral blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments attached to the uterus. A second continuous loop electrode may be simultaneously positioned beneath the lateral blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments, and the two loop electrodes clamped together to capture the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments therebetween. Current is then delivered through or between the loop electrodes to sever and cauterize the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. The current is preferably radiofrequency, where it may be delivered bipolar between the two loop electrodes or monopolar using a separately applied dispersion electrode typically located on the patient's back or thighs.
Positioning of the loop electrodes typically comprises passing the loop electrodes transvaginally through incisions at the rear vaginal wall near the cervix. Usually, a pair of incisions will be made, one on top of the cervix (anteriorly) and one on the bottom of the cervix (posteriorly). The loop electrodes may then be advanced in a laterally collapsed configuration to pass through the incisions. The electrodes may then self expand or otherwise be deployed back to the original configuration after having passed through the incisions and having been positioned on either side of the uterus.
In specific aspects of the present invention, the electrodes may be advanced through a collar positioned adjacent to the cervix in the vaginal cavity. In such instances, the collar may define the lateral width of the electrodes as they pass through the incisions. Alternatively, the continuous loop electrodes may be constrained by an outer structure, such as a sheath, as they are being advanced through the incisions. In that case, the sheath or other constraining structure may be removed or released to allow the loops to deploy to their original configuration which has been sized to be placed about the uterus.
After the continuous wire loop electrodes have been properly positioned anteriorly and posteriorly of the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments circumscribing the uterus, the power is delivered as discussed above in order to dissect and cauterize the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments. It will then be necessary to remove the uterus by any one of several conventional or novel means. In some instances, it will be desirable to use the wire loop structures of the present invention to provide traction on the uterus and pull the uterus through the cervix and vagina. In some instances, the loop electrodes may be modified with inner barbs which engage and hold the uterus after it has been mobilized to facilitate extraction. Optionally, conventional forceps or other tools can be used in conjunction with the wire loop electrodes to assist in applying traction to remove the uterus.
In other instances, however, it may be desirable to remove the continuous wire loop electrodes prior to removing the uterus. In such instances, the uterus may then be removed transvaginally using other conventional techniques. Optionally, the mobilized uterus may be removed using a uterine traction device described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/137,970, the full disclosure of which has previously been incorporated herein by reference. In still other instances, it may be desirable to remove the uterus laparoscopically where the uterus is usually morcelated using laparoscopically introduced morcelation tools. After morcelation, the uterus may be placed within a conventional removal bag and removed through a laparoscopic cannula.
The present invention provides electrocautery devices and methods for use of such devices for mobilizing a uterus prior to hysterectomy. Devices and methods will be particularly suitable for use in both transvaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures, but could also find in more conventional, open surgical hysterectomy procedures. In addition to removal of the uterus in hysterectomy procedures, the devices and methods of the present invention could also be used for electrosurgical ligation of tubular structures, such as the ovaries (oophorectomy), and/or the fallopian tubes (salpingo-oophorectomy), the uterine arteries and the like.
Referring to
Referring now to
The first and second continuous loop electrodes 32 and 34 will usually, although not necessarily, be coupled together by a separate coupling structure, such as collar 36. Additionally, the loop electrodes 32 and 34 will be adapted to permit coupling to an external power supply 40, typically a radiofrequency power supply capable of delivering power in the range from 50 W to 1000 W, typically from 200 W to 500 W, usually in both cutting and coagulation modes, as is well known in the electrosurgical arts. The power supply 33 may be configured to deliver the radiofrequency energy in a “bipolar” manner, i.e. where the first and second loop electrodes 32 and 34 are connected to different poles of the power supply, respectively. Alternatively, the power supply 40 could be configured to drive the electrodes 32 and 34 in a “monopolar” manner, where the electrodes are connected to a common terminal of the power supply and a second terminal of the power supply is connected to a dispersive electrode which is externally connected to the patient (not shown) typically on the thighs or lower back.
Loop electrode structures according to the present invention are preferably constructed so that they are laterally flexible but relatively stiff in the anterior-posterior direction when they are introduced to the patient. Such preferential flexibility in the lateral direction allows the electrodes to be laterally constrained while they are being introduced, thus facilitating introduction through relatively small incisions in the vaginal wall, as will be described in more detail hereinbelow. Such preferential flexibility is typically achieved by constructing the loop electrodes to have a dimension in the anterior-posterior direction which is substantially greater than the lateral or width dimension of the electrode. Examples of such constructions are shown in
A first method for deploying the loop electrodes 32 and 34 through the collar 36 is illustrated in
Optionally, a plurality of barbs 37 may be formed over at least a portion of an interior edge 39 of either or both of the loop electrodes 32 and 34. The barbs will engage and grasp the uterine body to assist in removing the mobilized uterine body by pulling on the electrodes. For example, after applying energy to cauterize and cut the blood vessels, tubular structures, and ligaments, the loop electrodes can be circumferentially tightened about the uterine body. The barbs will penetrate the uterine tissue to help hold the uterine body as it is extracted.
As an alternative to deploying the electrode structure through the collar as shown in
Referring now to
The continuous loop electrodes 32 and 34 are first deployed through incisions in the vaginal wall, typically near the cervix and above and below (anterior and posterior) of the uterine body 11. The loop electrode structures are advanced to positions over and beneath the uterine body 11, as shown in
Once the surrounding structures have been cauterized and severed, the uterus may be removed by conventional techniques, typically by transvaginal or laparoscopic techniques. Transvaginal removal may be assisted using the methods and has been previously incorporated herein by reference. Usually, the cervix will be removed together with the remaining portions of the uterine body. In other instances, however, it may be desired to preserve the cervix. In such instances, the loop electrodes may be modified so that they do not cut or cauterize arteries and veins with supply blood to the cervix.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3709215 | Richmond | Jan 1973 | A |
3845771 | Vise | Nov 1974 | A |
3920021 | Hittenbrandt | Nov 1975 | A |
4041952 | Morrison et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4072153 | Swartz | Feb 1978 | A |
4671274 | Sorochenko | Jun 1987 | A |
4972846 | Owens et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4976717 | Boyle | Dec 1990 | A |
4979948 | Geddes et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5037379 | Clayman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041101 | Seder et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5108408 | Lally | Apr 1992 | A |
5116327 | Seder et al. | May 1992 | A |
5133713 | Huang et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5151102 | Kamiyama | Sep 1992 | A |
5178618 | Kandarpa | Jan 1993 | A |
5207691 | Nardella | May 1993 | A |
5217030 | Yoon | Jun 1993 | A |
5267998 | Hagen | Dec 1993 | A |
5269780 | Roos | Dec 1993 | A |
5269782 | Sutter | Dec 1993 | A |
5281216 | Klicek | Jan 1994 | A |
5282799 | Rydell | Feb 1994 | A |
5290287 | Boebel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295990 | Levin | Mar 1994 | A |
5300087 | Knoepfler | Apr 1994 | A |
5324289 | Eggers | Jun 1994 | A |
5330471 | Eggers | Jul 1994 | A |
5336229 | Noda | Aug 1994 | A |
5336237 | Chin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342381 | Tidemand | Aug 1994 | A |
5352223 | McBrayer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5352235 | Koros et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356408 | Rydell | Oct 1994 | A |
5391166 | Eggers | Feb 1995 | A |
5395369 | McBrayer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5396900 | Slater et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403312 | Yates et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417687 | Nardella et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423814 | Zhu et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443463 | Stern et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445638 | Rydell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456684 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458598 | Feinberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462546 | Rydell | Oct 1995 | A |
5482054 | Slater et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484435 | Fleenor et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484436 | Eggers et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496312 | Klicek | Mar 1996 | A |
5496317 | Goble et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514134 | Rydell et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520698 | Koh | May 1996 | A |
5531744 | Nardella et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540684 | Hassler, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540685 | Parins et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542945 | Fritzsch | Aug 1996 | A |
5549606 | McBrayer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558100 | Cox | Sep 1996 | A |
5558671 | Yates | Sep 1996 | A |
5569243 | Kortenbach | Oct 1996 | A |
5573535 | Viklund | Nov 1996 | A |
5578052 | Koros et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5599350 | Schulze et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603711 | Parins et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611803 | Heaven et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624452 | Yates | Apr 1997 | A |
5637110 | Pennybacker | Jun 1997 | A |
5637111 | Sutcu et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5653692 | Masterson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658281 | Heard | Aug 1997 | A |
5662676 | Koninckx | Sep 1997 | A |
5665085 | Nardella | Sep 1997 | A |
5665100 | Yoon | Sep 1997 | A |
5667526 | Levin | Sep 1997 | A |
5669907 | Platt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674184 | Hassler, Jr. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674220 | Fox et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681282 | Eggers et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683385 | Kortenbach | Nov 1997 | A |
5683388 | Slater | Nov 1997 | A |
5688270 | Yates et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693051 | Schulze et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697949 | Giurtino et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700261 | Brikerhoff | Dec 1997 | A |
5702390 | Austin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707369 | Vatekunas et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709680 | Yates et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713896 | Nardella et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718703 | Chin | Feb 1998 | A |
5733283 | Malis et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735289 | Pfeffer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735848 | Yates et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735849 | Baden et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741285 | McBrayer | Apr 1998 | A |
5743906 | Parins et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746750 | Prestel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755717 | Yates et al. | May 1998 | A |
5833690 | Yates et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840077 | Rowden et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5979453 | Savage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6059766 | Greff | May 2000 | A |
6059782 | Novak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066139 | Ryan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6123701 | Nezhat | Sep 2000 | A |
6152932 | Ternstrom | Nov 2000 | A |
6245069 | Gminder | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254601 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334861 | Chandler et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6494881 | Bales et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6546933 | Yoon | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6602251 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6743229 | Buysse et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746488 | Bales | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764488 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6905506 | Burbank et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926712 | Phan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7033356 | Latterell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7094235 | Francischelli | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7169146 | Truckai et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179254 | Pendekanti et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20010014805 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020124853 | Burbank et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040199161 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050033276 | Adachi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070895 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096645 | Wellman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107781 | Ostrovsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050256524 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261676 | Hall et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060025765 | Landman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070027450 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |