The present invention relates generally to the fields of electronics and traffic engineering and more particularly to systems and methods for transmitting visibility-enhancing or warning signals from group(s) of moving pedestrians or vehicles.
Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.71(e), this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection and the owner of this patent document reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Pedestrians (e.g., runners, joggers, walkers, etc.) and occupants of certain vehicles (e.g., bicyclists, motorcyclists, drivers of slower-moving or otherwise vulnerable vehicles) can be susceptible to injury due to vehicular impact. Such pedestrians and vehicles sometimes travel or move along a roadway in groups of two or more. For example, a peloton of bicyclists might include 20 to 50 or more riders. When spread out in the direction of travel in the early morning or evening, front and/or rear lights attached to the bicycles may flash to provide warning to approaching drivers of motor vehicles. However, to the approaching vehicle driver, this may appear from a distance as random flashing lights without giving the oncoming driver a clear appreciation of the overall size of the group.
Existing warning lamps installed on bicycles, motorcycles and other moving vehicles flash to warn approaching drivers. The individual flash of either a forward or rear facing lamp has limited energy and, therefore, limited visual light output owing to available power and reflector surface area. Improvements in efficiency (LED versus incandescent) of the light source, sophisticated optic, and improved battery technology have led to better warning lights. However, injury as a result of impact continues and with increasing frequency. There is a need for improvements in warning light optics, power, and efficiency. Pedestrians suffer the same disadvantage when walking along a roadside. Groups of children walking to school, for example, in the early morning hours of winter are difficult to see in the darkness. Flashing lamps on the backpacks, headgear, shoes or garments worn by such pedestrians can make them more visible to oncoming drivers.
In accordance with this invention, such flashing lamps may flash in synchrony or unison or otherwise emit light in synchrony or unison (e.g., solid non flashing, pattern-flashing, etc.) when several pedestrians or vehicles are moving in a group, thereby enhancing the perceived brightness and size of the emitted light and rendering the group more visible to oncoming traffic.
In accordance with one aspect of the present disclosure, there are provided position indicating devices which emit synchronized position indicating signals when moving within a particular distance range (i.e., a synchronization range) of other ones of such moving devices. In some embodiments, these devices may be in the form of electronic flares which emit flashes of light or other signals, examples of such flares being described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,088,222; 7,106,179; 8,154,424; 8,550,653; 8,564,456; 8,579,460; 9,288,088; 9,835,319; D510,289; D515,957; D515,958; D560,533; D654,387; D669,805; D778,752 and D778,753 as well as United States Patent Application Publication Nos. 2013/0113634; 2016/0186971 and pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/893,420, the entire disclosure of each such patent and application being expressly incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, these devices may be attached to or integrated/manufactured on or in a vehicle, vehicle accessory or other object, such as, for example, vehicles, bicycles, bicycle seats, bicycle lamps, motorcycles, motorbikes, wearable garments, vests, shoes, running shoes, headgear, caps, hats, helmets, hard hats, straps, leg straps, arm straps, belts, back-packs, lanyards, jewelry, ear rings, necklaces and wrist bands.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, there are provided position indicating devices which are operable while moving along with other such devices, wherein each such device comprises: at least one emitter which emits a position indicating signal; a radio or other receiver (which may include a transmitter as well); a power source; and electronic circuitry configured and programmed to a) receive synchronization signal(s), via the receiver, from other position indicating devices located within a synchronization range of said device; and b) in response to the receipt of one or more synchronization signal(s) from one or more other position indicating devices located within the synchronization range, causing said at least one emitter to emit a signal that is synchronized with signals being emitted by said one or more other position indicating devices located within the synchronization range.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for using a plurality of position indicating devices to indicate the positions of a plurality of moving pedestrians or vehicles, said method comprising the step of causing each of said pedestrians or vehicles to be equipped with at least one of said devices, each of said devices comprising an emitter which emits position indicating signals and control apparatus programmed to i) sense when that device is within a synchronization range of one or more of the other devices and, when within said synchronization distance range of one or more others of said devices and, ii) cause that device's emitter to emit a position indicating signal that is synchronized with position indicating signals being emitted by said one or more of the others of said devices that are positioned within the synchronization range.
Further aspects and details of the present invention will be understood upon reading of the detailed description and examples set forth herebelow.
The following detailed description and examples are provided for the purpose of non-exhaustively describing some, but not necessarily all, examples or embodiments of the invention, and shall not limit the scope of the invention in any way.
The following detailed description and the accompanying drawings to which it refers are intended to describe some, but not necessarily all, examples or embodiments of the invention. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The contents of this detailed description and the accompanying drawings do not limit the scope of the invention in any way.
When several bicyclists are riding along the side of a road, their warning lamps may blend in with ambient and infrastructure lamps placed for multiple purposes. For example, light emanating from store fronts, crossing automobiles, retail buildings, etc., all will tend to obscure the flashing warning lamp of the bicyclist. Also, when vehicles attempt to travel in a group, such as a funeral procession, military vehicle convoy, etc., it is sometimes difficult for other vehicles traveling on the same roadway to visually perceive the existence or extent of such group. The present invention provides signaling devices and systems which may be embodied in, held, carried, worn or affixed to such pedestrians or vehicles and are programmed to emit synchronized position indicating signals when such pedestrians or vehicles are moving in a group, thereby aiding visibility and perception of the group.
In another non-limiting example, the present invention provides means to enhance or multiply the safety features of bicycle or motorcycle illumination. The multiplication factor is simply the number of bicyclists in the group (peloton). Currently, each flashing lamp when not coordinated with the light output of other members of the group provides a fraction of the group's total available battery energy and light output. By providing coordination of the individual flashing lamps the “group” will appear as a much larger and brighter entity, thereby providing safety beyond that available to multiple, independently-flashing bicycles warning lamps.
This invention addresses the advantage provided by coordinating a large number of individual flashing safety lights on a group of moving nodes (for example, bicycles, motorcycles, motor homes, road-side walkers or joggers, etc.). By coordinating the flashing of LED lamps on individual nodes, the “Group” is made to appear larger and more distinctive, thereby providing a safety advantage.
Using radio, infrared, or sound communication, a mesh-network, master-slave, or hybrid communications network, the formerly independent flashing of lamps on moving and non-connected vehicles or pedestrians can be coordinated such that all the lamps flash in unison, or in sequence, or in some other more readily visible pattern.
This invention addresses the challenges associated with coordinating an action (for example, flashing of a lamp) amongst multiple, disparate moving entities. To provide for dynamic position synchrony, the network must account for positional changes as well as signal strength variations owing to multipath reflection off automobiles, trucks, and bicycles. In addition, simultaneous flashing of all the lamps requires network coordination, timing, and the ability for dynamic numbering of network nodes leaving and joining the network.
As seen in
In the example shown in
If one of the non-grouped devices 12a or 12f subsequently becomes within the synchronization range SR of any of the grouped devices 12b, 12c, 12d or 12e, that device will then automatically join the group and will adopt/begin to emit the synchronized position indicating signal along with the other grouped devices 12b, 12c, 12d and 12e.
If one of the grouped devices 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d moves outside of the group's synchronization range SR, that device will then cease to emit the synchronized group position indicating signal and will either become quiescent and not emit any signal or will adopt and begin to emit a different or non-synchronized position indicating signal.
In some embodiments, the synchronized group position indicating signal emitted by the grouped devices 12b, 12c, 12d and 12e may be sequential in nature. For example, flashes of light may be emitted in sequential order from the first device 12b to the last device 12d or from the last device 12d to the first device 12a. In such sequential embodiments, if the order of the grouped devices 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e changes, the devices will be programmed to automatically re-sequence themselves to maintain the desired first-to-last or last-to-first sequence, even though the actual order of the devices within the group has changed change.
When multiple bicycles or pedestrians or other vehicles utilizing the same equipment approach each other and are within radio range, one of the radios must assume control to initiate the coordinating signal. However, this same temporary master may soon move out of range. Hence, any other node (bicycle) must be capable of assuming control. Furthermore, as all the devices are programmed exactly the same, there is no predefined “master” or “slave”. The network must be able to dynamically hand off control from each member to the next. Hence, the network must act both as a master-slave and as a mesh depending upon range and conflict issues. A novel aspect of this invention is the dynamic shifting between mesh and Master-Slave topologies. A fundamental aspect of this is that all nodes when not within range of another node will, for example, flash the lamp once-per-second. However, two nodes may not be flashing in synchrony even though each is flashing at once-per-second. Once in range, each node will establish the “master” clock to synchronize the emitted signals (e.g., flashes of light).
With reference to
Should a similar series of events occur in an approaching group of cyclists where a network has already been established, then a potential conflict will occur. Both groups, having formed networks independently, will be transmitting Network-Establish Signals. However, one of the parameters is network size. The network with the greater number of nodes, for example (could be smaller node count takes control) will take control of the smaller network. The smaller network will continue transmitting Network-Establish Signals but with a) a new node number that includes the sum of both groups; b) adopt the NES identifier of the larger group; and c) in unison with the larger group.
Referring to
As other Groups approach, the same systematic approach to establishing a single Group will take place. Should groups have the same number of nodes, the tie-breaker will be the unique identifier of each node (similar to MAC address). The node with the lower numeric unique identifier will take control. In another embodiment, the higher numeric identifier might take control.
In systems of the present invention, a mesh network or “Master-Slave” network may be used to coordinate timing. Other modalities include GPS timing signals received via satellite, real-time clock modules, or cellular timing signals or timing signals from Universal Time Transmission (e.g. WWV Fort Collins, Colo. or similar government timing broadcast in Europe or Asia). The technical approach used includes establishing a common clock signal across the network. To simultaneously flash all lamps in the network, the new approach described in this document incorporates a fixed delay between sequence number in the network and the flash of the lamp. For example, using a 10-lamp network, node number 1 sends a signal to its most immediate neighbors defining a timing signal. It then waits 900 milliseconds to flash its lamp. Node number 2 hears the signal and waits 800 milliseconds to flash its lamp. Node number 3 hears the signal and waits 700 milliseconds to flash its lamp. This continues until lamp number 10 receives a clock signal and flashes immediately. The lowered number lamps all are staged to flash at the same time even without direct radio, infrared, ultrasound, or other media communication. Based upon this scheme, all 10 lamps will flash simultaneously. If 11 lamps are in the system, then node 11 will hear the signal from node 10 other nodes and delay its flash for 900 milliseconds. It will flash at the same time as node 1, which is the same as all the other nodes.
The net effect is that despite being out of range of all but one lamp, all the lamps will flash simultaneously; each lamp need not “hear” lamp number 1, or any other number lamp. Using an “association matrix” or neighbor table, each lamp must hear only 1 of the closest 8 lamps; that is, any one of 4 lamps with numbers greater than N or 4 lamps with numbers lower than N.
This is illustrated in Table 1 below:
In the above Association Matrix illustrated by line b) above, lamp N receives information from 3 lamps with lower sequence number and 1 lamp with higher sequence number. Any one of these lamps can provide the necessary information for lamp N to acquire timing and flash-delay data. Hence, lamp N need not be in range of lamp 1.
To dynamically establishing relative positioning, an “association matrix” or neighbor table is used to efficiently define the absence or presence of neighboring nodes.
An alternative to multiple moving nodes (bicycles, vehicles, pedestrians) flashing lamps in unison is for the lamps to flash in a sequential order from last-in-line to first-in-line. This flash pattern will present a dynamic flashing “arrow” to approaching motorists. To accomplish this, each node must establish its physical location (position) relative to the other nodes. Furthermore, as one bicycle passes another, this position must change dynamically to renumber the nodes.
An alternative algorithm could use the combination of tail-lamp and head-lamp to communicate sequence number from trailing to leading nodes (bicycles, for example). Linking the tail-lamp and head-lamp would allow for a modulated signal to carry position and sequence information in the visible light spectrum, infrared spectrum, using high-frequency sound, or radio communication. The tail-lamp and head-lamp of any one bicycle or other vehicle or pedestrian would communicate with each other via radio (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, for example), hard wire connection, sound, infrared light, etc. The node number would therefore be transmitted by visible light modulation or infrared-light modulation or sound or radio to the physically closest leading node and physically closest following node. The rear-most tail lamp would not receive a recognized signal from behind, and therefore, would assume the sequence position at the end of the peloton. The head-lamp would send position information to the next bicycle in line. This information would be received by the tail lamp ahead (using a photodetector, phototransistor, photodiode, LED acting as a photodiode when not flashing, etc.). The next member would continue to send its position information to the node ahead, and so on. This architecture would allow for rapid sequencing of multiple lamps. As moving nodes (pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles) changed position, the new physical location would be established via node number transmitted and received from the tail-lamp and head-lamp.
Alternatively, and depending upon size of the plastic enclosure of the lamp and length of antenna, a lower frequency (greater range) radio signal may be used. This will allow for deployment of a simple “Master-Slave” system where one node (bicycle) is designated as the Master, and all other nodes are “Slaves”. At lower frequencies, the range of the Master will be adequate to control all Slaves within a 2 kilometer or greater range.
Once the individual nodes are “linked” by the mesh-network, Master-Slave, or Hybrid network, the rate of LED flash and pattern may be dynamically controlled. For example, with proximity detection using ultrasound, radar, laser reflection, head-light intensity, etc., a vehicle approaching from the rear of the group could be sensed and through micro-controller firmware embedded in the flashing lamp change the flash pattern. Changes could include longer duration duty cycle of flash, brighter flash, more rapid flash, etc. This would alert the approaching driver by providing dynamic patterns rather than a monotonous constant flashing pattern. For example, as the vehicle approaches, the simultaneous flashing of many bicycle tail lamps can increase in brightness and rapidity of flashing and ultimately become a “constant-on” or steady-burn illumination to make the bicyclists most visible. Alternatively, the color of the flashing tail-lamps could change from amber to red, or green, based upon proximity of an approaching vehicle. This dynamic response of the flash pattern to the approaching vehicle represents a novel and important safety feature.
Large groups of pedestrians (crowds) wearing devices that emit light or sound or other energy form can be coordinated in a similar fashion. Recent demonstrations of this crowd dynamic behavior have been seen in Olympic stadiums, where wrist bands or head lamps will flash with different color and patterns. In all the demonstrations, however, the coordinating signal is infrastructure dependent, that is, an infrared or radio signal is broadcast from a central location in close proximity to the crowd, and often in line-of-sight of the crowd. The “master” signal may be broadcast by several infrared light sources that are hard-wired to a central control system. In the proposed invention, coordination of crowd node behavior does not require a central infrastructure source or master signal. The control signal can be generated by any node and immediately control the behavior of all nodes in the network. For example, in a large football stadium with 100,000 fans, each carrying a low-cost node, a change of the electronic behavior of each node (LED color, flash rate, intensity, sound emission, etc.) can be coordinated by any single node in the crowd, if programmatically permitted, or by an administrator node sitting in the crowd. The same crowd can exit the stadium and synchronized, coordinated behavior would continue. There is no need for a high-energy, centrally located infrared or radio signal to be in line-of-sight of all the nodes.
With successful linking of two or more bicycles, motorcycles, vehicles, pedestrians, etc. (nodes), the flash dynamics could be designed to change. For example, while solo riding, a bicycle taillight might flash for 100 milliseconds once per second. However, when “linked” to another bicycle via radio, infrared, light, or other signaling modality, the taillight might cease flashing and initiated a “Steady Burn” mode where both lamps (two bicycles) stays lit continuously. In a large group, simultaneous flashing might be annoying or less effective than steady illumination of the group. The group can choose one of many “patterns” that will become “default” once a group is formed, and this can be different than the flash pattern when an individual is riding solo. The lamp will have a solo mode and group mode, both programmable by the operator.
Although the invention is described with respect to pedestrians or vehicles which are “moving,” it is to be appreciated that in some instances the movement of some or all of the pedestrians or vehicles may stop. For example, a group of pedestrians or cyclists traveling along a roadway may stop from time to time, and then subsequently resume movement. In some instances, the position indicating devices may remain on and may continue to emit their position indicating signals while the pedestrians or vehicles are stopped. In other instances, the position indicating devices may be turned off while the pedestrians or vehicles are stopped and may then be re-started when the pedestrians or vehicles subsequently resume movement. Also, the reference to moving pedestrians herein shall be construed to include not only pedestrians who are walking, jogging, standing or running but also persons who are performing actions or otherwise moving about within an area, such as workers or emergency personnel who are working in a construction zone or accident site on or near a roadway or other thoroughfare.
It is to be appreciated that, although the invention has been described hereabove with reference to certain examples or embodiments of the invention, various additions, deletions, alterations and modifications may be made to those described examples and embodiments without departing from the intended spirit and scope of the invention. For example, any elements, steps, members, components, compositions, reactants, parts or portions of one embodiment or example may be incorporated into or used with another embodiment or example, unless otherwise specified or unless doing so would render that embodiment or example unsuitable for its intended use. Also, where the steps of a method or process have been described or listed in a particular order, the order of such steps may be changed unless otherwise specified or unless doing so would render the method or process unsuitable for its intended purpose. Additionally, the elements, steps, members, components, compositions, reactants, parts or portions of any invention or example described herein may optionally exist or be utilized in the absence or substantial absence of any other element, step, member, component, composition, reactant, part or portion unless otherwise noted. All reasonable additions, deletions, modifications and alterations are to be considered equivalents of the described examples and embodiments and are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/529,423 entitled Synchronized Behavior of Bicycle, Motorcycle, and Pedestrian Warning Devices filed on Jul. 6, 2017, the entire disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3500378 | Pickering et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3787867 | Dodge et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3846672 | Doughty | Nov 1974 | A |
4132983 | Shapiro | Jan 1979 | A |
4249159 | Stasko | Feb 1981 | A |
4345305 | Kolm et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4827245 | Lipman | May 1989 | A |
4841278 | Tezuka et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5294924 | Dydzyk | Mar 1994 | A |
5345232 | Robertson | Sep 1994 | A |
5438495 | Ahlen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5673039 | Pietzsch et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5754124 | Daggett et al. | May 1998 | A |
6299379 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332077 | Wu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6486797 | Laidman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6549121 | Povey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6614358 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
D498164 | Delich | Nov 2004 | S |
6929378 | Wang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D510289 | Dueker et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
6963275 | Smalls | Nov 2005 | B2 |
D515957 | Dueker et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
D515958 | Dueker et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
7088222 | Dueker et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106179 | Dueker et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7182479 | Flood et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7277809 | DeWitt, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7298244 | Cress et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7301469 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
D560533 | Dueker et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
D564387 | Rubin et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
7455419 | Helget et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7563158 | Haschke et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D631582 | Hwang | Jan 2011 | S |
8072345 | Gallo | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D654387 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8154424 | Selevan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8220950 | Sunshine | Jul 2012 | B1 |
D669805 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
D678100 | Hwang | Mar 2013 | S |
8550653 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564456 | Selevan | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579460 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602584 | Ghafoori et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643511 | Batterson | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8786461 | Daudelin | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8949022 | Fahrner et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9066383 | Gerszberg | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9288088 | McIlroy | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9437109 | Stafford et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9489809 | Dever | Nov 2016 | B1 |
D778752 | Selevan | Feb 2017 | S |
D778753 | Selevan | Feb 2017 | S |
9835319 | Selevan et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20020036908 | Pederson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020067290 | Peet, II et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020154787 | Rice et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159251 | Hart | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164666 | Cimbora et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175831 | Bergan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040056779 | Rast | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100396 | Antico et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113817 | Novak et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124993 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040183694 | Bauer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050040970 | Hutchins et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050210722 | Graef et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248299 | Chemel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060072306 | Woodyard | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104054 | Coman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060165025 | Singh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070038743 | Hellhake et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070099625 | Rosenfeld | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115139 | Witte et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153520 | Curran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070155139 | Hecht et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194906 | Sink | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222640 | Guelzow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070273509 | Gananathan | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037431 | Werb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042866 | Morse et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091304 | Ozick et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122607 | Bradley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080242220 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267259 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090034419 | Flammer, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090115336 | Wang | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187300 | Everitt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100259199 | McDermott | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110249430 | Stamatatos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249688 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120256765 | Selevan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277934 | Ohtomo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287611 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130113634 | Hutchinson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130221852 | Bowers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130260695 | Wang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271294 | Selevan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293396 | Selevan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140126187 | Bennett et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140210373 | Baret | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150077234 | Fullam | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150366275 | Cserfoi | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160174099 | Goldfain | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160186971 | Selevan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160248506 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170097128 | Stafford | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170354019 | Julian | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2014130842 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2016070193 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Finley, M.D. et al., “Sequential Warning Light System for Work Zone Lane Closures,” Texas Transportation System, (2011) pp. 1-23. |
Sun, C. et al., “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Sequential Warning Lights in Nighttime Work Zone Tapers”, University of Missouri, Report to the Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative, Jun. 6, 2011. |
Internet Website Screen Capture, www.empco-lite.com; Sep. 6, 2010. |
PCT International Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2018 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/017683. |
PCT International Search Report dated May 28, 2014 in PCT Application US2014/017756. |
PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2016 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/060770. |
PCT International Search Report dated Oct. 26, 2018 in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/041126. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 20, 2018 in related European Application No. 15858697.4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190045599 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62529423 | Jul 2017 | US |