Many technologies have been employed in order to visualize or locate cardiac tissue in the beating heart, including ultrasound, contrast enhanced fluoroscopy, electrical sensors, and direct visualization via a small camera or endoscope surrounded by a transparent fluid such as saline.
Each of these technologies is has its limitations, including resolution, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), and/or fluid overload, among others. Resolution with transesophageal echo (TEE) can be insufficient, while at the same time it is difficult to obtain an absolute orientation, given the degrees of freedom of the probe. Electrical sensors can be effective to signal contact with tissue, but are prone to error when used to determine depth of penetration below the surface of the tissue. In addition to CIN mentioned above, fluoroscopic interpretation is made more difficult by the transient nature of the contrast injection, and can be exacerbated further by the shape of the heart chamber. For example, fluoroscopic short axis views of the left ventricle can be difficult to interpret for patients with conditions such as heart failure or mitral valve regurgitation. These conditions can necessitate the use of a larger volume of contrast to obtain an adequate image. The inability to precisely assess the cardiac tissue in a beating heart renders it difficult to perform procedures with the precision needed to adequately treat these patients.
Disclosed herein are devices and methods for assessing the surface of a target cardiac tissue and for delivering a tissue anchor to cardiac tissue at a preselected depth within the endocardium. In one variation, a delivery device may comprise an elongate body, a tissue anchor disposed within a first longitudinal lumen of the elongate body, and a tissue depth indicator slidable within a second longitudinal lumen of the elongate body. The tissue depth indicator may have a first configuration where the tissue depth indicator extends tangentially toward and/or past the distal tip/end of the elongate body and a second configuration where the tissue depth indicator points or extends sharply away from the distal tip of the elongate body. In the first configuration, the tissue depth indicator may be capable of delineating the boundary and/or surface structures of the target tissue. The tissue depth indicator may transition to the second configuration when the distal tip of the elongate body has been advanced to a preselected depth into the target tissue. Optionally, some delivery catheters may further comprise a penetration depth limiter that resists or limits penetration of the delivery catheter into the tissue after a preselected depth has been reached. In some variations, a tissue depth indicator may also be configured to resist or limit the penetration of the delivery catheter into tissue.
One variation of a tissue anchor delivery device may comprise an elongate body comprising a proximal end, a distal end, a first longitudinal lumen that terminates at a first distal opening located at the distal end of the elongate body, and a second longitudinal lumen that terminates at a second distal opening located proximal to the distal end of the elongate body, a tissue anchor disposed in the first longitudinal lumen and configured to exit the first distal opening when deployed into tissue, and a tissue depth indicator. The anchor delivery catheter may comprise a push member slidably disposed within the first longitudinal lumen and configured to contact and distally advance the tissue anchor, and a stop structure located within the first longitudinal lumen and configured to restrict sliding the push tube past a selected location along the first longitudinal lumen. The tissue depth indicator may be slidable within the second longitudinal lumen such that a distal portion of the tissue depth indicator exits the second distal opening. The distal portion of the tissue depth indicator may comprise a first configuration where the distal portion extends toward the distal end of the elongate body and a second configuration where the distal portion extends away from the distal end of the elongate body, and where the tissue depth indicator is configured to transition from the first configuration to the second configuration after the distal end of the elongate body has penetrated a tissue surface at a pre-selected depth. In the first configuration, the distal portion of the indicator wire may form an obtuse angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen, and in the second configuration, the distal portion of the indicator wire may form an acute angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen. For example, the obtuse angle may be from about 90 degrees to about 180 degrees (e.g., about 120 degrees), and the acute angle may be from about 0 degrees to about 89 degrees (e.g., about 80 degrees). In the first configuration, sliding the tissue depth indicator within the second longitudinal lumen may vary the length of the distal portion of the indicator that exits the second longitudinal lumen. At least the distal portion of the indicator wire may be radiopaque.
A distance between the second distal opening and the distal end of the elongate body may correspond to the pre-selected penetration depth. In some variations, the tissue depth indicator may comprise a radiopaque indicator wire having a proximal portion, and the distal portion of the indicator wire may be more compliant or flexible (e.g., less stiff) than the proximal portion. For example, the proximal portion of the indicator wire may have a first stiffness and the distal portion of the indicator wire may have a second stiffness, and the second stiffness may be about 5% to about 50% of the first stiffness. The distal portion may have a length from about 1 cm to about 5 cm, e.g., about 3 cm. The distal portion of the tissue depth indicator may extend beyond the distal end of the elongate body. In some variations, the first longitudinal lumen may be distinct from the second longitudinal lumen. For example, the first longitudinal lumen and the second longitudinal lumen may be separated by a wall.
Another variation of a tissue anchor delivery device may comprise an elongate body comprising a proximal end, a distal end, a first longitudinal lumen that terminates at a first distal opening located at the distal end of the elongate body, a second longitudinal lumen that terminates at a second distal opening located proximal to the distal end of the elongate body, and a tissue depth limiter located within the second longitudinal lumen such that a distal portion of the tissue depth limiter exits the second distal opening and the distal end of the limiter is rotatably attached along an outer wall of the elongate body at a location proximal to the first distal opening, and a tissue anchor disposed in the first longitudinal lumen and configured to exit the first distal opening when deployed into tissue. The distal portion of the tissue depth limiter may comprise a first configuration where at least a length of the distal portion is substantially straight, and a second configuration wherein the distal portion has a preformed curve. Contacting the preformed curve with tissue may cause the preformed curve to rotate with respect to the elongate body and may help to prevent the distal end of the elongate body from penetrating a tissue surface beyond a pre-selected depth. The distal end of the tissue depth limiter may be radiopaque and/or may be rotatably attached along the outer wall of the elongate body at a hinge. The hinge may comprise a wire pin. In some variations, the distal end of the tissue depth limiter may comprise a loop, and the wire pin may be disposed through the loop such that in the second configuration, the tissue depth limiter rotates (e.g., with respect to the elongate body) by translating along the pin. A distance between the attachment location of the depth limiter to the elongate body and the distal end of the elongate body corresponds to the pre-selected penetration depth.
Also disclosed herein is a method of deploying a tissue anchor. One variation of a method may comprise advancing an anchor delivery device to a surface of a target tissue, where the anchor delivery device may comprise an elongate body comprising a proximal end, a distal end, a first longitudinal lumen that terminates at a first distal opening located at the distal end of the elongate body, and a second longitudinal lumen that terminates at a second distal opening located at a distance proximal to the distal end of the elongate body, a tissue anchor disposed in the first longitudinal lumen, and a tissue depth indicator located within the second longitudinal lumen. The method may further comprise sliding the tissue depth indicator within the second longitudinal lumen such that a distal portion of the tissue depth indicator exits the second distal opening to contact the surface of the target tissue, urging a distal portion of the tissue depth indicator along a length of the target tissue surface to delineate the tissue surface (e.g., the edge), advancing the distal end of the anchor delivery device into the target tissue until the distal portion of the tissue depth indicator deflects away from the tissue surface, and deploying the tissue anchor from the first distal opening into the target tissue. Urging the distal portion of the tissue depth indicator may comprise sliding the tissue depth indicator within the second longitudinal lumen. When the distal portion of the tissue depth indicator is urged along the target tissue surface, the distal portion may form an obtuse angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen and when the distal portion of the tissue depth indicator deflects away from the tissue surface, the distal portion may form an acute angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen. In some variations, the obtuse angle may be from about 90 degrees to about 180 degrees (e.g., about 120 degrees), and the acute angle may be from about 0 degrees to about 89 degrees (e.g., about 80 degrees). Deploying the tissue anchor may comprise advancing a push member to contact the anchor such that it exits the first distal opening. The method may further comprise advancing a tunnel catheter to the surface of the target tissue before advancing the anchor delivery device. The tunnel catheter may comprise one or more side apertures along a distal length of the tunnel catheter, and advancing the anchor delivery device may comprise advancing the anchor delivery device through a first side aperture of the tunnel catheter. In some variations, the method may further comprise withdrawing the anchor delivery device after deploying the tissue anchor and advancing a second anchor delivery device within the tunnel catheter through a second side aperture of the tunnel catheter. The target tissue may be cardiac tissue, such as ventricular tissue and/or endocardium of the left ventricle. Fluoroscopy may be used to visualize the steps of advancing the anchor delivery device, sliding the tissue depth indicator, urging the distal portion of the tissue depth indicator and deploying the tissue anchor.
Similar devices and methods may be used for the percutaneous delivery of a tissue anchor to any region of the body, including, but not limited to, blood vessels (e.g., arteries, veins), heart valves. Although the examples herein are described in the context of delivering anchors to myocardium of the left ventricle as part of a beating heart procedure, it should be understood that similar devices and methods may also be used for the delivery of anchors to myocardium of any of the heart chambers, valves, trabeculae, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, or any cardiac structures.
Disclosed herein are devices and methods for assessing the surface of a target cardiac tissue and for delivering one or more tissue anchors at a preselected depth within the cardiac tissue. Visualization of cardiac tissue is often complicated by the presence of blood and moving tissue, and as such, it can also be challenging to effectively deliver tissue anchors to a desired depth of into tissue. Penetration depth itself, without effective visualization, may be difficult to interpret, especially in diseased hearts or myocardium, which may have additional anatomical irregularities. For example, as a delivery catheter is advanced into myocardium, the actual depth achieved for a given displacement of the delivery catheter is a function of apposition between a reference starting point and the endocardium, any tissue tenting, and surface topology or trabeculations. Each of these variables can contribute significant challenges to accurately determining the actual penetration depth of the delivery catheter (and therefore, the actual delivery location of the anchor).
The devices and methods described herein allow the boundary of the cardiac surface to be visualized in a beating heart, and facilitate providing an indication as to the depth of penetration into that tissue by, for example, an anchor delivery catheter. Optionally, the devices herein below may also limit the penetration depth of a delivery catheter tip beyond a preselected depth. These features may allow a practitioner to identify the dynamic cardiac surface in real time with a degree of certainty, thereby allowing for the delivery of a tissue anchor at a preselected depth with greater precision.
One variation of an anchor delivery device may comprise an elongate body having a proximal end, a distal end, a first longitudinal lumen that terminates at a first distal opening located at the distal end and a second longitudinal lumen that terminates at a second distal opening. A tissue depth indicator may be provided within the second longitudinal lumen. The tissue depth indicator may be inserted into the second longitudinal lumen during manufacturing or may be inserted by a practitioner just prior to inserting the delivery catheter into a patient. In some variations, a tissue anchor may be disposed within the first longitudinal lumen, and may, for example, be located near a distal segment of the first longitudinal lumen. The anchor may be preloaded during manufacturing of the delivery catheter, or may be loaded by a practitioner just prior to inserting the delivery catheter into a patient. The anchor may be located just proximal to the first distal opening so that distally translating a pushing member within the first longitudinal lumen and contacting the anchor may push or advance the anchor out from the delivery catheter through the first distal opening. The tissue depth indicator may be an elongate element, such as a wire or guidewire, that has a proximal portion and a distal portion, configured to be slidably disposed within the second longitudinal lumen of the elongate body. Alternatively, in some variations, a tissue depth indicator may be disposed within the first longitudinal lumen of the elongate body (i.e., in the same longitudinal lumen as the anchor). The proximal portion may be stiffer than the distal portion, which may provide sufficient column strength so that the tissue depth indicator can be pushed from its proximal end and advanced through the second longitudinal lumen without looping or twisting. In contrast, the distal portion may be less stiff and/or more compliant than the proximal portion. For example, the distal portion of the depth indicator may be deflected, bent, angled, curved, bowed, and/or turned when it encounters a tissue surface. The compliant distal portion of the depth indicator may exit the second distal opening. The tissue depth indicator may have two configurations. In the first configuration, the distal portion may form an obtuse angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen and/or may extend along and/or toward the distal end of the elongate body. In some variations, the distal tip of the tissue depth indicator may point towards, or in the same direction as, the distal tip of the elongate body. In the first configuration, the distal-most length of the depth indicator may extend or track along the surface of a target tissue. In the second configuration, the tissue depth indicator may form an acute angle with respect to the second longitudinal lumen and/or may deflect backward away from the distal end of the elongate body and/or the surface of the target tissue. In some variations, the distal portion of the depth indicator in the first configuration may have a relatively smooth or gradual curve (i.e., a relatively large radius of curvature), without any acute or sharp curves or angles. For example, there may not be an acute angle or sharp turn or inflection where the tissue depth indicator exits the second distal opening. In contrast, the distal portion of the depth indicator in the second configuration may comprise an inflection or discontinuity, such as a sharp curve, bend or angle, with a relatively abrupt change in curvature (i.e., a relatively small radius of curvature). For example, there may be an acute angle or sharp turn of inflection where the tissue depth indicator exits the second distal opening. This sharp bend may be readily visible by various imaging techniques, including fluoroscopy or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), which may provide a visual signal or indication of when the depth indicator has transitioned from the first configuration to the second configuration. The distance between the second distal opening (where the depth indicator exits the second longitudinal lumen) and the first distal opening may (where the anchor exits the first longitudinal lumen) may correspond to a preselected depth in tissue where the anchor is desired to be delivered. In some variations, the length of the distal portion of the depth indicator may be longer than the distance between the first and second distal openings, such that if desired, the tissue depth indicator may be advanced such it extends beyond the distal end of the elongate body.
A tissue depth indicator may comprise a radiopaque material. For example, at least the distal portion of a depth indicator wire may be radiopaque, while the proximal portion of the depth indicator may or may not be radiopaque. A depth indicator having at least a radiopaque distal portion may allow the conformational changes of the distal portion to be visualized using fluoroscopy techniques. Changes in the geometry or orientation of the depth indicator (e.g., changes in the curves of a depth indicator wire) as it interacts with myocardial tissue may help a practitioner to identify the location of the tissue surface with respect to the delivery catheter. For example, as the distal tip of the delivery catheter is advanced towards and into the target tissue, the tissue depth indicator may be in the first configuration. When the distal tip of the delivery catheter reaches a desired, preselected tissue depth, the tissue may press against the tissue depth indicator, thereby deflecting it away from the tissue surface and transitioning it to the second configuration. In the second configuration, the depth indicator may deflect away from the tissue at a sharp curve or discontinuity, as previously described.
A tissue depth indicator may be made of one or more materials. For example, a tissue depth indicator may comprise a wire or guidewire where the proximal portion is made of small diameter Nitinol or stainless steel, and the distal, tissue-contacting portion is made of a coil of platinum, platinum-iridium, tungsten or gold wound around a core wire of Nitinol or stainless steel. Alternatively, the proximal and distal portions of the indicator wire may be made of the same material(s), such as nickel titanium alloy, stainless steel, etc. Alternatively or additionally, a depth indicator wire may have a radiopaque core (e.g., a nickel titanium alloy core, stainless steel core, or scitanium core) and a polymeric exterior. For example, a depth indicator wire may have a proximal portion having a stainless steel core and a distal portion having a nickel titanium alloy core, with either the same or different polymeric exterior. In another example, a depth indicator wire may have a nickel titanium alloy core throughout its entire length, but the proximal portion may have a PTFE exterior while the distal portion may have a polymeric hydrophilic exterior. In some variations, the overall length of the indicator wire may be from about 120 cm to about 600 cm, e.g., from about 130 cm to about 300 cm, about 180 cm, about 195 cm, about 200 cm, about 300 cm, about 450 cm. The proximal portion may have a length from about 115 cm to about 595 cm, e.g., about 145 cm. The distal portion may have a length from about 1 cm to about 8 cm, e.g., about 2.5 cm, about 3 cm, about 3.5 cm, about 5 cm. The proximal portion may be constructed from a circular cross section wire with an area moment of inertia of I=(πr4)/4, where r is the radius of the circular section, and a large modulus of elasticity (E), such that the stiffness is proportional to I*E. For example, the proximal portion may be constructed from a 300 series stainless steel wire with a radius of 0.15 mm (0.006 in) such that the stiffness is proportional to I*E=84.7 Nmm2 (0.03 lbf*in2). The distal, tissue-contacting portion may be relatively softer or more flexible, having, for example, a coil construction using a lower modulus material such as titanium, and stiffness only 5% to 50% as great as the proximal portion. In some variations, the distal portion may be about 5%, about 10%, about 25%, about 40%, about 50%, as stiff as the proximal portion. The diameter of the depth indicator wire may be from about 0.005 in to about 0.050 in, e.g., about 0.008 in, about 0.010 in, about 0.012 in, about 0.014 in, about 0.018 in, about 0.035 in, etc. In some variations, the distal portion of the depth indicator wire may have a preformed curve (e.g., a J curve) while in other variations, the distal portion may not have a preformed curve.
Optionally, some anchor delivery catheters may comprise a tissue depth limiter, which may help to resist or prevent advancing a delivery catheter beyond a certain tissue depth. This may be a safety feature to help ensure that the delivery catheter does not puncture or cut through the target tissue. In some variations, there may be a structure separate from the tissue depth indicator that resists or stops further advancement of the delivery catheter past a certain tissue depth while in other variations, the tissue depth indicator itself may resist advancement of the delivery catheter past a certain tissue depth. In one variation, an anchor delivery catheter may comprise an elongate body having a proximal end, a distal end, and a first longitudinal lumen that terminates at a first distal opening located at the distal end and a second longitudinal lumen that terminates at a second distal opening located proximal to the distal end. The tissue delivery catheter may further comprise a tissue depth limiter disposed within the second longitudinal lumen. The tissue depth limiter may have a protrusion, such as a shoulder or curved surface, that may abut against tissue and resist distal travel of the delivery catheter into tissue. The curvature of the protrusion, especially the tissue-contacting surfaces of the protrusion, may be selected such that the protrusion does not cause tissue trauma (e.g., may be an atraumatic tissue-contacting surface). In some variations, a tissue anchor may be disposed within the first longitudinal lumen, and may, for example, be located near a distal segment of the first longitudinal lumen. The anchor may be preloaded during manufacturing of the delivery catheter, or may be loaded by a practitioner just prior to inserting the delivery catheter into a patient. The anchor may be located just proximal to the first distal opening so that distally translating a pushing member and contacting the anchor may push or advance the anchor out from the delivery catheter through the first distal opening.
In one variation, a tissue depth limiter may comprise a first, low-profile configuration and a second, expanded configuration. One variation of a tissue depth limiter may comprise an elongate member, such as a wire (e.g., a flat wire), disposed within the second longitudinal lumen of the elongate body, where a distal portion of the elongate member exits the second distal opening and the distal tip of the elongate member is attached along an outer surface of the elongate body. The attachment location of the depth limiter may be at a preselected distance proximal to the distal end of the elongate body. In some variations, the preselected distance may correspond to the maximum tissue depth at which the anchor delivery catheter tip may be advanced. The distal-most end of a depth limiter may be rotatably attached to the elongate body. For example, the distal-most end of a depth limiter may be coupled to an attachment member that is attached to the elongate body such that there is a rotational degree of freedom between the distal-most end of the depth limiter and the attachment member. For example, the depth limiter may be movably coupled to the attachment member such that movement along the attachment member would cause the depth limiter to rotate around the elongate body. Alternatively or additionally, the distal-most end of the depth limiter and the attachment member may be coupled as a ball-and-socket arrangement, which may allow the depth limiter to pivot around the attachment member. In the first configuration, the depth limiter may be flush against the outer surface of the elongate body. This may be a desired configuration for navigating the anchor delivery catheter through the vasculature (and/or within the lumen of an outer catheter) before it reaches the mydocardium. Before the delivery catheter contacts the surface of the myocardium, the depth limiter may be transitioned to the second expanded configuration. The depth limiter may be expanded into the second configuration by distally advancing the depth limiter within the second longitudinal lumen. The distally-directed pushing force on the depth limiter wire may cause the distal portion of the wire to curve or rotate away from the outer surface of the elongate body, thereby having a profile and stiffness that may act as a shoulder or protrusion to abut against tissue. In some variations, the distal portion of the depth limiter wire may have a preformed or preshaped curve such that when the depth limiter wire is pushed distally, the distal portion is biased toward having the preformed or preshaped curve. For example, at least the distal portion of the depth limiter wire may be made of a shape memory and/or elastic material such that the natural or low-energy state is the expanded or curved shape, and withdrawing the depth limiter wire within a lumen constrains the wire in a straightened, high-energy state. Once the distal portion of depth limiter wire is advanced distally through the second longitudinal lumen and the second distal aperture, the depth limiter wire automatically transitions to the second, expanded configuration. At least a portion of the depth limiter in the expanded configuration is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the delivery catheter and/or the surface of the target tissue. In some variations, a shoulder of the depth limiter extends away from the longitudinal axis of the delivery catheter. Once the distal end or tip of the delivery catheter has attained a certain tissue depth, the depth limiter contacts the tissue surface (e.g., at the shoulder of the limiter) and resists further advancement of the delivery catheter into the tissue. When the practitioner experiences this tactile indication (e.g., resistance against further advancement or distal movement), the practitioner may confirm the location of the anchor delivery catheter and/or penetration depth, and proceed to deliver the anchor from the distal end of the elongate body. After the anchor has been delivered, the depth limiter may be transitioned to the first, collapsed, configuration before the delivery catheter is withdrawn.
The distal-most end of a tissue depth limiter may be rotatably or pivotably attached to the elongate body (e.g., along the outer surface of the elongate body). In some variations, the distal portion of a tissue depth limiter may be more flexible than a proximal portion of the limiter to facilitate rotational or pivotal motion with respect to the elongate body. This may allow the depth limiter to rotate, pivot, or twist when it is in the expanded configuration. The degree and/or orientation direction of the rotation may depend on, for example, the amount of force exerted on the limiter by the tissue as the practitioner advances the delivery catheter into the tissue. That is, the deeper the penetration, the more the depth limiter may rotate. The depth limiter may rotate anywhere from about 1 degree to about 180 degrees, e.g., about 45 degrees, about 90 degrees, etc. In some variations, the rotation of the depth limiter may provide a visual signal (in addition or alternatively to a tactile signal) that a preselected depth into tissue has been attained. For example, when viewing a left ventricle from a short axis view, rotation of the depth limiter by about 90 degrees may provide a distinct visual cue (e.g., the limiter sweeping out to have a larger cross-sectional area or sweeping inward to have a smaller cross-sectional area) that the delivery catheter tip is at the preselected depth and/or that the depth limiter is pressed against the tissue surface. In variations where the tissue depth limiter comprises a radiopaque material, the conformational, rotational and/or orientation changes of the limiter can be visualized using fluoroscopy and/or transesophageal echocardiogram techniques. Alternatively, the distal-most end of a tissue depth limiter may be fixedly attached along the length of the elongate body. For example, the distal-most end may be attached to the elongate body by welding, soldering, and the like, and/or one or more adhesives.
The distal-most end of the limiter may be attached to the elongate body by any suitable rotational mechanisms, including, but not limited to, hinges, pivots, ball-and-socket joints, ball bearings, and the like. In one variation, the distal-most end of the depth limiter may comprise a loop and the rotatable attachment mechanism may comprise a curved wireform shaft or pin attached along the outer surface of the elongate body. The curved wireform shaft or pin may be in the form of a ring, or a partial ring (e.g., a U-shaped curve where the two ends are attached to the elongate body). The ring and the loop may mutually engage, thereby allowing the depth limiter to rotatably slide along the curve of the ring. In this variation, the depth limiter may sweep about 90 degrees counterclockwise with respect to a vertical axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the elongate body and/or about 90 degrees clockwise with response to the vertical axis, depending on the direction and magnitude of force applied on the depth limiter by the surface of the target tissue. The distance of the attachment mechanism from the distal end of the elongate body may correspond to a preselected tissue penetration depth. For example, if it is desired that the tip of the anchor delivery catheter is not to be advanced past a tissue depth of about 6 mm, then the attachment mechanism may be located at about 6 mm away from the distal end of the elongate body.
The tissue depth limiter may be made of any of the materials described above for the tissue depth indicator. The stiffness of the tissue depth limiter constructed from a Nitinol flat wire of width of about 0.006 in and thickness of about 0.011 inches may be about 0.04 lbf*in2 (275 Nmm2). In some variations, the tissue depth limiter may comprise a flattened nickel titanium alloy wire, while in other variations, the tissue depth limiter may comprise a hypodermic tube. A depth limiter comprising a flattened wire may have a width from about 0.010 in to about 0.04 in, e.g., about 0.015 in, about 0.025 in, about 0.0.030 in, about 0.035 in, etc., and a thickness from about 0.005 in to about 0.015 in. The second longitudinal lumen of the elongate body within which the depth limiter is disposed may have a width of about 0.0.018 in to about 0.043 in, e.g., about 0.02 in, about 0.025 in, about 0.04 in, etc. When the depth limiter is in the first collapsed configuration, the overall height of a distal section of the anchor delivery catheter (i.e., the sum of the diameter of the elongate body and the second longitudinal lumen) may be from about 0.06 in to about 0.10 in for example, about 0.09 in to about 0.11 in, e.g., about 0.098 in, about 0.1 in, etc. In the second expanded configuration, the overall height of the distal section of the anchor delivery catheter (i.e., the sum of the diameter of the elongate body and the height of the expanded depth limiter) may be from about 0.15 in to about 0.35 in for example, about 0.2 in to about 0.5 in, e.g., about 0.283 in, about 0.3 in, about 0.38 in, about 0.45 in, etc.
Any of the anchor delivery catheters comprising a tissue depth indicator and/or a tissue depth limiter described herein may further comprise a push member, such as a push tube, within the first longitudinal lumen of the elongate body to deploy an anchor disposed within that lumen. The elongate body may optionally have one or more curves, where the one or more curves define one or more distinct planes that may be located at one or more angles with respect to each other.
Alternatively or additionally, the elongate body of the anchor delivery catheter may be steerable. The actuation of the push member, along with the control of the tissue depth indicator and/or tissue depth limiter, and/or any steering mechanisms of the delivery catheter, may be controlled at a proximal handle of the delivery catheter. In some variations, one or more tethers or sutures may be threaded through the anchor to be delivered (e.g., where the implanted device comprises a series of tethered anchors), and the proximal end of the one or more tethers or sutures may be coupled to the proximal handle of the delivery catheter. For example, the proximal handle may comprise a suture holder that is configured to releasably retain a suture, a push tube actuator, and a tissue depth indicator port. Optionally, the proximal handle may comprise a tissue depth limiter port. A practitioner may control the length of the depth limiter or indicator that exits the distal opening of the second longitudinal lumen by advancing or retracting/withdrawing the proximal portion of the limiter and/or indicator at these proximal ports. Optionally, the location of the depth indicator and/or limiter may be locked at a proximal portion. In some cases, a tissue depth indicator wire may be withdrawn entirely from the delivery catheter. The push tube actuator may comprise a locking mechanism so that the position of the push tube may be secured once it has been advanced to the desired location. Any portion of these components may be radiopaque, as may be desirable for fluoroscopic monitoring of the progress of the procedure. For example, the distal tip of the elongate body and/or a distal length of the tissue depth indicator and/or limiter may be radiopaque.
Any of the anchor delivery catheters described herein may also comprise a push tube stop structure within the first longitudinal lumen of the elongate body. The push tube stop structure may prevent the push tube from being over-advanced, e.g., advanced out of the elongate body. In some variations, an anchor delivery catheter may be one catheter in a system of catheters used in a multi-step intravascular procedure. In these procedures, an anchor delivery catheter may be advanced within the lumen of one or more other catheters, and some anchor delivery catheters may comprise features to limit relative motion between nested catheter elements, as well as to help direct orientation of the anchor delivery catheter with respect to outer catheter elements. For example, an anchor delivery catheter may optionally comprise stop elements that limit its travel within a guide catheter and/or a multi-window catheter so that the length of the delivery catheter that extends out from these catheters is restricted. These stop elements may be external to the anchor delivery catheter, but internal to the outer guide catheter and/or multi-window guide catheter (e.g., the stop elements do not contact the target tissue). In some variations, a stop element may be a flat ribbon, wire loop, spring, protrusion, wing or petal. Additional details regarding anchor delivery catheters with stop elements that limit its travel within a guide catheter and/or multi-window catheter without contacting tissue are provided in co-pending U.S. Pat. Appin. Pub. No. 2014/0142619, filed Oct. 11, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
One variation of an anchor delivery catheter comprising a tissue depth indicator is depicted in
Some variations of an anchor delivery catheter may alternatively or additionally comprise a tissue depth limiter, which may resist penetration of the distal tip of the delivery catheter past a preselected depth. This may provide a tactile signal to a practitioner that a desired (or maximum) penetration depth has been attained.
The distal end of the depth limiter may be attached to the elongate body of the delivery catheter by any suitable method. For example, the distal end may be attached to the elongate body (e.g., the outer surface of the elongate body) by welding, soldering, and the like, and/or using one or more adhesives. These types of attachment mechanisms may allow the distal end of the depth limiter to be rigidly attached to the elongate body. In other variations, other types of attachment mechanisms may allow the distal end of the depth limiter to pivot, rotate, slide and/or otherwise deflect with respect to the elongate body. One variation of a rotatable attachment mechanism 332 is depicted in
Also disclosed herein are methods of visualizing the surface of a target tissue and determining the penetration depth of an anchor delivery catheter into the target tissue. In some variations, these devices and methods may be used to deliver anchors to a particular depth in the endocardium of the left ventricle during a beating heart procedure. One example of a method for visualizing and determining the depth of delivery catheter penetration into tissue is outlined in the flow diagram of
The method 400 may comprise advancing a guide catheter (step 402) to subvalvular tissue in the LV.
If a tissue depth indicator is not used, the method would comprise the steps depicted in
Using a delivery catheter with a tissue depth indicator may help to provide information about the location of the endocardium as well as the penetration depth of the delivery catheter tip. To continue from step 406 of the method 400, the next step may comprise advancing the tissue depth indicator out of a lumen of the delivery catheter (step 408) ahead of the distal tip of the delivery catheter, as depicted in
Although the method 400 uses the anchor delivery catheter with additional catheters (e.g., a guide catheter and a tunnel catheter), it should be understood that the anchor delivery catheter may be used to deliver anchors without other catheters, with fewer catheter, or with more catheters. One example of a method for delivering anchors is depicted in
An anchor delivery catheter comprising a tissue depth limiter may also be used to perform the methods of
Also disclosed herein are kits comprising an anchor delivery catheter and a tissue depth indicator and/or tissue depth limiter. In one variation, a kit may comprise an anchor delivery catheter comprising an elongate body with a first longitudinal lumen terminating at a first distal opening and a second longitudinal lumen terminating at a second distal opening. The kit may further comprise a depth indicator wire configured to be disposed within the second longitudinal lumen of the elongate body, where the depth indicator wire may have a proximal portion and a distal portion that is relatively more compliant or flexible than the proximal portion. The depth indicator wire may be pre-assembled during manufacturing so that it is disposed within the second longitudinal lumen, or may be kept separate from the elongate body and inserted by the practitioner just prior to use. Optionally, the kit may comprise an anchor disposed within the first longitudinal lumen. In another variation, a kit may comprise an anchor delivery catheter comprising an elongate body with a first longitudinal lumen terminating at a first distal opening and a second longitudinal lumen terminating at a second distal opening, and an anchor disposed within the first longitudinal lumen. The tissue depth indicator may be in a separate kit. Alternatively, a kit may comprise an anchor delivery catheter comprising an elongate body with a first longitudinal lumen terminating at a first distal opening and a second longitudinal lumen terminating at a second distal opening and a tissue depth limiter disposed within the second longitudinal lumen and attached at a distal end of the elongate body. The kit may or may not include an anchor disposed within the first longitudinal lumen.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/058,847, filed on Aug. 8, 2018, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 10,980,529, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/061,748, filed on Mar. 4, 2016, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 10,058,321, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/128,628, filed on Mar. 5, 2015, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3656185 | Carpentier | Apr 1972 | A |
3773034 | Burns et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3961419 | Schwartz | Jun 1976 | A |
3976079 | Samuels et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4014492 | Rothfuss | Mar 1977 | A |
4034473 | May | Jul 1977 | A |
4042979 | Angell | Aug 1977 | A |
4043504 | Hueil et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4044765 | Kline | Aug 1977 | A |
4053979 | Tuthill et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4055861 | Carpentier et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4069825 | Akiyama | Jan 1978 | A |
4273127 | Auth et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4290151 | Massana | Sep 1981 | A |
4384406 | Tischlinger | May 1983 | A |
4445509 | Auth | May 1984 | A |
4445892 | Hussein et al. | May 1984 | A |
4489446 | Reed | Dec 1984 | A |
4494542 | Lee | Jan 1985 | A |
4576772 | Carpenter | Mar 1986 | A |
4619247 | Inoue et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4681093 | Ono et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4700250 | Kuriyama | Oct 1987 | A |
4726371 | Gibbens | Feb 1988 | A |
4758221 | Jureidini | Jul 1988 | A |
4784133 | Mackin | Nov 1988 | A |
4817613 | Jaraczewski et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4845851 | Warthen | Jul 1989 | A |
4848341 | Ahmad | Jul 1989 | A |
4850354 | McGurk-Burleson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4898577 | Badger et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4898591 | Jang et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906230 | Maloney et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4961738 | Mackin | Oct 1990 | A |
4969893 | Swor | Nov 1990 | A |
4976710 | Mackin | Dec 1990 | A |
5037404 | Gold et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5057092 | Webster, Jr. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064431 | Gilbertson et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084058 | Li | Jan 1992 | A |
5103804 | Abele et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125909 | Heimberger | Jun 1992 | A |
5133723 | Li et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152744 | Krause et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5195990 | Weldon | Mar 1993 | A |
5221255 | Mahurkar et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5242456 | Nash et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5242457 | Akopov et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254107 | Soltesz | Oct 1993 | A |
5257975 | Foshee | Nov 1993 | A |
D345419 | Horrigan et al. | Mar 1994 | S |
5312341 | Turi | May 1994 | A |
5314407 | Auth et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324298 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5344439 | Otten | Sep 1994 | A |
5346500 | Suchart | Sep 1994 | A |
5358479 | Wilson | Oct 1994 | A |
5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
5366479 | McGarry et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368564 | Savage | Nov 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381782 | DeLarama et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383905 | Golds et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5399164 | Snoke et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403348 | Bonutti | Apr 1995 | A |
5409483 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415666 | Gourlay et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417700 | Egan | May 1995 | A |
5423837 | Mericle et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437680 | Yoon | Aug 1995 | A |
5439470 | Li | Aug 1995 | A |
5445625 | Voda | Aug 1995 | A |
5450860 | O'Connor | Sep 1995 | A |
5452513 | Zinnbauer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474572 | Hayhurst | Dec 1995 | A |
5507725 | Savage et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520702 | Sauer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522873 | Jackman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524630 | Crowley | Jun 1996 | A |
5527323 | Jervis et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542924 | Snoke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545134 | Hilaire et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545168 | Burke | Aug 1996 | A |
5565122 | Zinnbauer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569218 | Berg | Oct 1996 | A |
5571215 | Sterman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591194 | Berthiaume | Jan 1997 | A |
5624397 | Snoke et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626614 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
5630824 | Hart | May 1997 | A |
5640955 | Ockuly et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643289 | Sauer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669917 | Sauer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674197 | Van Muiden et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674279 | Wright et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690655 | Hart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695505 | Yoon | Dec 1997 | A |
5701905 | Esch | Dec 1997 | A |
5709695 | Northrup, III | Jan 1998 | A |
5713950 | Cox | Feb 1998 | A |
5716370 | Williamson, IV et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718725 | Sterman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725542 | Yoon | Mar 1998 | A |
5735290 | Sterman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741260 | Songer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741301 | Pagedas | Apr 1998 | A |
5752518 | McGee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752964 | Mericle | May 1998 | A |
5752966 | Chang | May 1998 | A |
5755730 | Swain et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766189 | Matsuno | Jun 1998 | A |
5766240 | Johnson | Jun 1998 | A |
5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769830 | Parker | Jun 1998 | A |
5779673 | Roth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779718 | Green et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810848 | Hayhurst | Sep 1998 | A |
5810853 | Yoon | Sep 1998 | A |
5817107 | Schaller | Oct 1998 | A |
5827171 | Dobak, III et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833632 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843169 | Taheri | Dec 1998 | A |
5848969 | Panescu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849035 | Pathak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860992 | Daniel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860993 | Thompson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861003 | Latson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868733 | Ockuly et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879371 | Gardiner et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885238 | Stevens et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888240 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897537 | Berg et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902321 | Caspari et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904651 | Swanson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904657 | Unsworth et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906579 | Vander Salm et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911715 | Berg et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916147 | Boury | Jun 1999 | A |
5919208 | Valenti | Jul 1999 | A |
5935149 | Ek | Aug 1999 | A |
5947983 | Solar et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961440 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5961539 | Northrup, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971975 | Mills et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972004 | Williamson, IV et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976120 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984933 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
5989284 | Laufer | Nov 1999 | A |
5991650 | Swanson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010531 | Donlon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013083 | Bennett | Jan 2000 | A |
6015428 | Pagedas | Jan 2000 | A |
6029671 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050936 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056743 | Ellis et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059715 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066160 | Colvin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074401 | Gardiner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077214 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077989 | Kandel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080182 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099553 | Hart et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110184 | Weadock | Aug 2000 | A |
6125852 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149658 | Gardiner et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156044 | Kammerer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159187 | Park et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162168 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165183 | Kuehn et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168588 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183469 | Thapliyal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197017 | Brock et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199262 | Martin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203531 | Ockuly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210432 | Solem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228096 | Marchand | May 2001 | B1 |
6250308 | Cox | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254620 | Koh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258118 | Baum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260552 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269819 | Oz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283993 | Cosgrove et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306149 | Meade | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311692 | Vaska et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312447 | Grimes | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328727 | Frazier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332893 | Mortier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355030 | Aldrich et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378289 | Trudeau et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391048 | Ginn et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406420 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409743 | Fenton, Jr. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423088 | Fenton, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428562 | Bonutti | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6432123 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6461327 | Addis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491689 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514265 | Ho et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524338 | Gundry | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533753 | Haarstad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540755 | Ockuly et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551332 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575971 | Hauck et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589160 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591472 | Noone et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595983 | Voda | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602288 | Cosgrove et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6602289 | Colvin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607541 | Gardiner et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610087 | Zarbatany et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613059 | Schaller et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619291 | Hlavka et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626899 | Houser et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641593 | Schaller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645160 | Heesch | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648874 | Parisi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648903 | Pierson, III | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651671 | Donlon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655386 | Makower et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669687 | Saadat | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676702 | Mathis | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689164 | Seguin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695793 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699263 | Cope | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702826 | Liddicoat et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716243 | Colvin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718985 | Hlavka et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723038 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6723107 | Skiba et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733509 | Nobles et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746471 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749560 | Konstorum et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6752813 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6790231 | Liddicoat et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793618 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818001 | Wulfman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6849077 | Ricci | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6908424 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923818 | Muramatsu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932792 | St. Goar et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6951557 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976995 | Mathis et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986775 | Morales et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989025 | Burgmeier et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991643 | Saadat | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997931 | Sauer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004958 | Adams et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7037334 | Hlavka et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7048754 | Martin et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101395 | Tremulis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125421 | Tremulis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166127 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186262 | Saadat | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189199 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226467 | Lucatero et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232422 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235086 | Sauer et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241310 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257450 | Auth et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276062 | McDaniel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306585 | Ross | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326231 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331972 | Cox | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7344544 | Bender et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7452325 | Schaller | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7534204 | Starksen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7588582 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618449 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632308 | Loulmet | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666193 | Starksen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722523 | Mortier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740638 | Hyde | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753858 | Starksen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753924 | Starksen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766812 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776812 | Lang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832406 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850600 | Piskun | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7883538 | To et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7918787 | Saadat | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8096985 | Legaspi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8343173 | Starksen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388680 | Starksen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8882713 | Call et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9173646 | Fabro | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9616197 | Serina et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10058321 | Sampson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10625047 | Serina et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10980529 | Sampson | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20010005787 | Oz et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010014800 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023332 | Hahnen | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010031979 | Ricci | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041821 | Wilk | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047165 | Makower et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007190 | Wulfman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013571 | Goldfarb et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013621 | Stobie et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026201 | Foerster et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029080 | Mortier et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035361 | Houser et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035393 | Lashinski et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042621 | Liddicoat et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065536 | Hart et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072757 | Ahmed et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077524 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087048 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087049 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087148 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087169 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095167 | Liddicoat et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095175 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133092 | Oslund et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138044 | Streeter et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156526 | Hlavka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161378 | Downing | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165486 | Bertolero et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173841 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183787 | Wahr et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183835 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193815 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198536 | Trout, III et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009196 | Peterson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014060 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018358 | Saadat | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032979 | Mortier et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033006 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045893 | Ginn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060813 | Loeb et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069577 | Vaska et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069593 | Tremulis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074012 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078465 | Pai et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078601 | Shikhman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078603 | Schaller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093118 | Ho et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105520 | Alferness et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125739 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125767 | Collier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130731 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144697 | Mathis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158464 | Bertolero | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158581 | Levinson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167062 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167071 | Martin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171736 | Bon | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171776 | Adams et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199974 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220685 | Hlavka et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225420 | Wardle | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233105 | Gayton | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233142 | Morales et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236535 | Onuki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003819 | St. Goar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019378 | Hlavka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024414 | Downing | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030382 | St. Goar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039442 | St. Goar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040092962 | Thornton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093024 | Lousararian et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093044 | Rychnovsky et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097788 | Mourlas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040118415 | Hall et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122450 | Oren et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138683 | Shelton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148020 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152947 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172046 | Hlavka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181238 | Zarbatany et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186378 | Gesswein | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186486 | Roue et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193191 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204724 | Kissel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210238 | Nobles et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236372 | Anspach, III et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236419 | Milo | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243102 | Berg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243227 | Starksen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260317 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050054919 | Spear et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055052 | Lombardo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055087 | Starksen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065550 | Starksen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075654 | Kelleher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075723 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080454 | Drews et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107810 | Morales et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107811 | Starksen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107812 | Starksen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119523 | Starksen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119673 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119734 | Spence et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119735 | Spence et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137689 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050184122 | Hlavka et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192629 | Saadat et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197694 | Pai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209690 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216078 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228452 | Mourlas et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251157 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251159 | Ewers et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251166 | Vaughan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251177 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251205 | Ewers et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251207 | Flores et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251208 | Elmer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251209 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251210 | Westra et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273128 | Reil | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273138 | To et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277966 | Ewers et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277981 | Maahs et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277983 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025750 | Starksen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025784 | Starksen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025787 | Morales et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058817 | Starksen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069429 | Spence et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089618 | McFerran et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122633 | To et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129188 | Starksen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155363 | LaDuca et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161040 | McCarthy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161177 | Worley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178682 | Boehlke | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184203 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190030 | To et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229697 | Gerdts et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229708 | Powell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241340 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241656 | Starksen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264975 | Pipenhagen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270976 | Savage et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271101 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287661 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005081 | Findlay, III et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005394 | Bleyendaal et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010852 | Blaeser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010857 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016250 | Blaeser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016287 | Cartledge et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032820 | Chin-Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038293 | St.Goar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049942 | Hindrichs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051377 | Douk et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055206 | To et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060880 | Gregorich et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066994 | Blaeser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093805 | Auth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100356 | Lucatero et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112244 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112424 | Spence et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112425 | Schaller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135830 | Schaeffer | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070250042 | Kiemeneij | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080045977 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045982 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045983 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051703 | Thornton et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051810 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051832 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051837 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058765 | Jais et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058868 | To et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065156 | Hauser et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097489 | Goldfarb et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103439 | Torrance et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114364 | Goldin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119882 | Cox | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177380 | Starksen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228032 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228267 | Spence et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234701 | Morales et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234702 | Morales et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234704 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234728 | Starksen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234815 | Starksen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243150 | Starksen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287828 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294177 | To et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314394 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2008 | A9 |
20090012541 | Dahl et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090182417 | Tremulis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198216 | Muni et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222083 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234318 | Loulmet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276038 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100023056 | Johansson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049213 | Serina et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076408 | Krever et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076548 | Konno | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082098 | Starksen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094213 | Horn et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094314 | Hernlund et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121349 | Meier et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145267 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185172 | Fabro | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198056 | Fabro et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198192 | Serina | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198208 | Napp et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120029535 | Swain | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120101442 | Legaspi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120232565 | Kveen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130030178 | Tripp et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130304093 | Serina et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20170361065 | Legaspi et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20200345980 | Serina et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0637431 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0669101 | Aug 1995 | EP |
1920795 | May 2008 | EP |
2433571 | Mar 2012 | EP |
H06237939 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H09289989 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H10506812 | Jul 1998 | JP |
H11318910 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000505336 | May 2000 | JP |
2001500749 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2003500121 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004500170 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004321343 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005021576 | Jan 2005 | JP |
WO-9403227 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-9515715 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9608208 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO-9610365 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO-9639942 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9727799 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9727807 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9729709 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9807375 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9846142 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO-0060995 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0067640 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0071195 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0119256 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0126586 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0137742 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0154618 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0200099 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0203892 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0230310 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-02051329 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-02053011 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-02085251 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02085252 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-03073913 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03088875 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03105667 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-03105670 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004037317 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004082523 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004082538 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2004112658 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005025644 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005062931 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2005102181 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006034243 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006037073 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006097931 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2006116558 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007005495 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007021564 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007021834 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007035449 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007056502 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007059233 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007100409 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2008028135 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008042987 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008048626 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2009137712 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2010085456 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010085457 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2016141358 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Corrected Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 18, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,748, filed Mar. 4, 2016, 10 pages. |
De Simone, R. et al. (Apr. 1, 1994). “Adjustable Annuloplasty for Tricuspid Insufficiency with External Control,” Reader's Comments and Reply, Am. J. Cardiol. 73(9):721-722. |
De Simone, R. et al. (Apr. 15, 1993). “Adjustable Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty Assisted by Intraoperative Transesophageal Color Doppler Echocardiography,” Am. J. Cardiol. 71(11):926-931. |
Downing, S.W. et al. (2002). “Feasibility of Off-Pump ASD Closure Using Real-Time 3-D Echocardiography,” The Heart Surgery Forum 5(2):96-99, Abstract 7025. |
Extended European Search Report mailed on Dec. 3, 2018 for EP Patent Application No. 18167829.3, filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report mailed on Dec. 6, 2011, for EP Patent Application No. 11 187 159.6, filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report mailed on Jan. 2, 2019 for EP Patent Application No. 16759631.1, filed on Mar. 4, 2016, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report mailed on Jun. 2, 2010, for EP Patent Application No. 07852809.8, filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report mailed on Oct. 19, 2016, for EP Patent Application No. 16177304.9, filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,593, filed Oct. 11, 2013, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 26, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 6 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 12, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jan. 24, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 6, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 7, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,748, filed Mar. 4, 2016, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on May 12, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,627, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on May 8, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on Apr. 30, 2008, for PCT Application PCT/US2007/022122 filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed on May 6, 2008, for PCT Application PCT/US2007/022122 filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on May 19, 2016, for PCT Application No. PCT/US16/21065 filed on Mar. 4, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Apr. 2, 2007, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/043597, filed Nov. 8, 2006, 4 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Dec. 8, 2006, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US/2006/030260, filed on Aug. 2, 2006, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Mar. 19, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/021437, filed on Jan. 19, 2010, 2 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Mar. 9, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US/2010/021440, filed on Jan. 19, 2010, 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed on May 6, 2008 for PCT Application PCT/US07/22122 filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 1 page. |
Nagy, Z.L. et al. (Dec. 2000). “Mitral Annuloplasty with a Suture Technique,” European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 18(6):739-740. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/270,034, filed Nov. 8, 2005, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 11, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/657,422, filed Jan. 19, 2010, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 19, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,627, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 6, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 19, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,748, filed Mar. 4, 2016, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jul. 6, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Jun. 21, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 15, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,109, filed Jan. 19, 2010, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 23, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,627, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 26, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 30, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Nov. 5, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/474,877, filed Mar. 30, 2017, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 1, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 18, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Oct. 23, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/776,682, filed Feb. 10, 2004, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 14, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/201,949, filed Aug. 10, 2005, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 15, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,593, filed Oct. 11, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 28, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,748, filed Mar. 4, 2016, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 24, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/058,847, filed Aug. 8, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Feb. 23, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,593, filed Oct. 11, 2013, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 3, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,627, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on May 22, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,748, filed Mar. 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Nov. 6, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,627, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 7 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed on Jul. 24, 2012, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-526078, filed on Aug. 2, 2006, six pages. (English Translation). |
Shumay, S.J. et al. (Dec. 1988). “A ‘Designer’ Annuloplasty Ring for Patients with Massive Mitral Annular Dilatation,” Ann. Thorac. Surg. 46(6):695-696. |
Towne, W.D. (Jan. 1973). “Letter to the Editor: Classification of Chordae Tendineae,” Circulation 47:209. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/051,292, filed May 7, 2008, by Legaspi et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/083,109, filed Jul. 23, 2008, by Johansson (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/104,681, filed Oct. 10, 2008, by Serina et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/104,686, filed Oct. 10, 2008, by To et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/145,964, filed Jan. 20, 2009, by Fabro (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/160,018, filed Mar. 13, 2009, by Johansson (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/160,230, filed Mar. 13, 2009, by Meier et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/160,670, filed Mar. 16, 2009, by Fabro et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,910, filed May 15, 2009, by Serina et al. (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/178,938, filed May 15, 2009, by Fabro (Copy not attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/128,628, filed Mar. 5, 2015, by Russel Sampson (Copy not attached). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on Dec. 8, 2006, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US/2006/030260, filed on Aug. 2, 2006, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on Mar. 19, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US/2010/021437, filed on Jan. 19, 2010, 8 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on Mar. 9, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US/2010/021440, filed on Jan. 19, 2010, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed on May 6, 2008 for PCT Application PCT/US07/22122 filed on Oct. 16, 2007, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. EP23181882.4, dated Jan. 5, 2024, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,384, dated Jan. 17, 2024, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/853,384, dated Mar. 30, 2023, 9 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2978599, dated Jul. 26, 2021, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210361278 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62128628 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16058847 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 17221294 | US | |
Parent | 15061748 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16058847 | US |