Typically, when someone leaves their home or office, they carry their smaller possessions in a large container such as a handbag, brief case, clothing pocket, or backpack. They might put their frequently used small items, such as jewelry, money, and change, into a purse. They might have a separate bag for things that are prone to be dirty such as cosmetics and related implements. Different cosmetic products are packaged in separate containers—multiple compacts for eye shadows and other facial cosmetics, a lipstick case, mirror case, and implement case. These purses and cosmetic packages are in turn tossed into the larger bag. Some items are distributed into pockets.
Storage of these items in a bag is a typically disorganized affair. Different cosmetic compacts may be hard to find or implements such as brushes might be in one case and the cosmetic compact in another. There is a possibility of forgetting to pack a critical implement that would be necessary for using an essential cosmetic.
In the case of cosmetics, one solution offered by manufacturers is to collect all the cosmetics together and supply a cosmetic kit where the different cosmetic products and implements are included in one large box with multiple compartments built in. The problem with such cases is that they are heavy and cumbersome to carry about. The user usually does not need to carry all the products included.
When a user carries around many different items, they may need to enclose them in a variety of containers including small boxes, pouches, or envelopes, or they may bind the items with clips and rubber bands. Not only is there no true organization of the items, there is a problem of securing loose items into a container. Loosely placed implements, fragile jewelry, and cosmetic pencils can be easily damaged especially when tossed into a container such as a large handbag or back pack.
There are various solutions on the market. There is the versatile handbag, carrying case, or knapsack. These are large spacious products that offer pockets and compartments but, offer little in modularity or organization.
The user could have a special container for each type of item, but that results in multiple dedicated containers thrown into a large handbag. This practice does not solve the organizational problem and requires extra space to accommodate the size of the additional containers. Furthermore, multiple packages require more packaging waste, since each package requires material to provide for such components as covers and secondary packaging.
Another solution that is available comprises a binder with rings, clips, or other mechanical fastening devices set within a relatively rigid outer holder. Such a device is cumbersome to use, unattractive and often designed cheaply.
The present disclosure relates to devices for those consumers who want an easy-to-use, attractive, and lightweight holder to securely organize and carry around their everyday items so that they are easily accessible. The device offers a modular function whereby consumers only need to carry those items that they would require to carry with them. The modular containers are designed such that they can be either carried outside, or stored at a home or office storage area, without the necessity of removing individual products or items from the unit itself.
Embodiments described herein provide solutions to the above-described problems of organization, security, and usability.
One exemplary embodiment allows a user to store individual items in attractive and secure rigid containers design to securely hold items and to modularly rigid containers. Such a set of rigid containers can be described as a storage unit that may be set on a table or in a drawer located in the consumer's home or office. The rigid containers would be magnetically held together. The consumer would select those rigid containers that contain the required items they wish to take and insert them into a portable flexible wallet-like holder. The flexible holder would be flat units that bend along an axis that approximately divides the holder into two sections. Those rigid containers that the consumer selects to bring would be magnetically secured into the flexible holder. Individual flexible holders might themselves be magnetically attachable to other flexible holders such that the user could carry multiple holders together. The magnets would have definite north-south pole orientations to allow maximum attractive strength between the rigid containers that incorporate them.
Another embodiment would allow some magnetizable elements to be used in lieu of magnets when feasible.
Another exemplary embodiment of the device would include a set of magnets incorporated in the containers and a corresponding set of magnets incorporated in the holders, where the magnets of both sets are strategically oriented along their north-south pole axes, such that the user may insert the rigid containers into the holder without regard to the container's orientation, and such that the magnets in the containers would correctly engage with the magnets in the flexible holder. This would be accomplished by alternating the north-south orientations so that the magnetic poles in multiple rigid containers and the holders assuring that the magnets would always match up.
Another embodiment of the device would insert additional magnets into the container, the holder, or both to further allow flexibility in orienting the container within the holder.
Another exemplary embodiment of the device would be to vary the distances between sets of magnets or magnetizable elements in the rigid containers and sets of magnets or magnetizable elements in the holders. It is accepted that the greater the distance between north-south poles of magnetic elements, the less force that the elements would attract each other. Likewise, the greater the distance between a magnet and a magnetizable element, the less attractive force between them. And finally, the greater the distance between two of the same poles of a magnetic element, that is, north-north or south-south, the less the repelling force between the elements. Therefore, the greater the distance between magnetic elements incorporated in containers and holders, the less the containers would be attracted to the holder. Likewise, the greater the distance between magnetic elements incorporated in two pairs of containers, the less the containers would be attracted to one another. If a typical device such as one including a holder and two containers is configured such the distance between magnetic elements of the holder and the containers is less than the distance between the pair of containers, the device will naturally open where the force is least, that is, between the pair of containers.
Another embodiment can include varying distances between individual containers such that they may open between pairs of containers whose incorporated magnetic elements are further than between other pairs.
Another embodiment can include configuring the distance between the corresponding magnetic elements of the holder and a container to be greater than between a pair of containers such that the device would first open between the holder and container.
Another embodiment might utilize pairs of repelling magnets to open various portions of the device in favor of opening between attractive sets of magnetic elements.
Another exemplary embodiment uses sets of magnets that have different chemical compositions such that their intrinsic strengths are increased or reduced. For example, a pair of neodymium magnets designated as N45, aligned such that their poles are opposite, would have a substantially larger attractive force between them, than would a pair of N30 magnetic elements. The magnetic elements could be incorporated in the device such that the device could selectively open between containers, or between a container and the holder by virtue of the weaker force between magnets.
Another embodiment incorporates a set of magnetic elements in either the holder or the container, and a set of corresponding magnetizable, but non-magnetic elements, such as iron, with enough permeability to react to a magnetic field. The force between such a pair of elements would typically be less than that between a pair of magnets. Therefore, the device configured with combinations of magnetizable and magnetic elements would preferably open between a magnet and a magnetizable element.
Another exemplary embodiment teaches a flexible holder which can hold varying numbers of containers by virtue of an adjustable folding axis.
Another embodiment of the device would include a septum that would be inserted between containers, or between containers and the flexible holder, to control the distance between the magnetic magnetizable elements.
Another embodiment includes a septum that is designed to protect items from falling out of the container and into another container.
Another embodiment includes a septum that serves further functionality such as a mirror or holding device.
Another embodiment includes a septum that is connected to, or part of the holder.
Another exemplary embodiment includes multiple holders that may themselves magnetically engage with one another to form a larger device.
Another embodiment where the containers may be removed from the holder and act as an independent storage device or be integrated into a separate storage unit.
Another embodiment where the device is designed to include multiple containers of various shapes and wall configurations.
Another embodiment where the container engages with the holder such that it can swivel out of the holder about an axis of a pair of magnets.
b depict an exemplary holding device comprising holders and containers whose respective magnets are embedded such that the distances between engaged magnets and/or the individual strengths of the magnets are varied to control how the device opens.
The figures herein depict various embodiments, for purposes of description and explanation, but are not intended to otherwise limit the scope of exemplary embodiments.
This specific configuration as described does not preclude other configurations of the placement of the magnets with the containers or holders. For instance, the magnets do not need to be located in the front of the holder. They could be set farther back towards the folding axis 103 or, farther towards opposite corners of the holder. Furthermore, though the depicted holder is rectangular, in various embodiments, it could be formed as other shapes such as semicircles, hexagons, or pentagons as shown in
Furthermore, magnetizable elements such as certain steels can be substituted for the magnets in the container as long as there are corresponding magnets in the flexible holder that are sufficiently strong and correctly positioned such that they can engage the magnetizable elements.
Various types of magnets yield different flux density characteristics. These densities represent the strength exerted on an object, at a set position and distance from the magnet. One of the factors, relevant to this invention that determines the force that a magnet exerts on an object is the chemical compositions of the magnet and the target object, the latter which could itself be a magnet or, a magnetizable element. The magnetic materials referenced in the exemplary embodiments are assumed to be neodymium, one of the most commonly used rare-earth magnets used for these applications. The strength is specified commercially by a range of numerals ranging from N30 and N50, the latter being the strongest. All other variables being equal, the north pole of a magnet rated as N35 interacting with the south pole of another magnet rated at N40, will be more strongly attracted to the target than it would to a magnetizable target such as iron or steel, neither of which have substantial innate magnetic properties. Other materials that can be used as magnets are rare-earths samarium-cobalt, alnico, or ferrite. Examples of commonly used magnetizable elements include iron, nickel, and some steels.
Another factor that determines the force that a magnet exerts on an object is the distance between them. As the distance between two magnets. or, a magnet and a magnetizable element decreases, the magnetic force between the two entities increases. Other factors that play a role in the interaction between magnetic substances include ambient temperature, shape of the elements involved, and the coating or materials that might be placed between the elements. But, for the purpose of describing the disclosed devices, these factors are not described in detail as they would be understood by persons skilled in the art.
The embodiments described in
In various embodiments, magnetizable elements such as certain steels can be substituted for the magnets in the flexible holder as long as there are corresponding magnets in the containers that are sufficiently strong and correctly positioned such that they can engage the magnetizable elements.
In various embodiments, multiple containers may be inserted into the holder. Instead of the variable distances shown in
Immediately surrounding the folding axis are folding area 103T, whose height is Mmax and width is W. These areas are designed to allow variable quantities of containers to be inserted into the device. This is further described later. The container upper and lower regions 106 and 107, whose respective heights are each L and, whose width is W, describe the approximate areas onto which containers would be placed such that their magnets would engage with the holder magnets, as has been described above. The container regions are the approximate areas that describe the surface between the respective holder magnets and the folding axis.
In various embodiments, the container regions would be constructed with a material such as cardboard or plastic to help support the containers, encased by a flexible fabric or leatherette material that would extend into the folding areas. The flexible material would allow the folding areas to bend, flex, or stretch as needed to accommodate the containers when they are in a closed position. But, the container areas do not necessarily need to be so stiffened. The holder could be constructed entirely of one or more flexible materials flexible material.
In various embodiments, the device contains substantially strong rare earth neodymium magnets. In various embodiments, other magnetic or magnetizable materials can be used including ferrous magnets, rubber magnets, nickel, or magnetizable steel or iron.
The shapes of the flexible holder are not limited to a rectangle. In various embodiments, circles, semicircles, hexagons, or amorphous two-dimensional shapes can be employed. In various embodiments, various textures or accessories might be incorporated on the outer surface of the holder. Or, the total area of the holder might be larger or, extend beyond the area that defines the container regions and the folding areas. These embodiments will still permit the device to function as described, as long as the relationship between the folding axis and the holder magnets allow the holder to bend such that the magnets can engage with the containers as described above.
Furthermore, the folding area could be comprised of materials such as thin polypropylene, non-woven nylon or even a stretchable material such as rubber. The material only needs to be sufficiently flexible to allow a holder to accommodate different numbers of containers or, containers of various heights.
The embodiments disclosed herein are examples of the disclosure and may be embodied in various forms. For instance, although certain embodiments herein are described as separate embodiments, each of the embodiments herein may be combined with one or more of the other embodiments herein. Specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure. Like reference numerals may refer to similar or identical elements throughout the description of the figures.
The phrases “in an embodiment,” “in embodiments,” “in various embodiments,” “in some embodiments,” or “in other embodiments” may each refer to one or more of the same or different embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure. A phrase in the form “A or B” means “(A), (B), or (A and B).” A phrase in the form “at least one of A, B, or C” means “(A); (B); (C); (A and B); (A and C); (B and C); or (A, B, and C).”
It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of the present disclosure. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the disclosure. Accordingly, the present disclosure is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances. The embodiments described with reference to the attached drawing figures are presented only to demonstrate certain examples of the disclosure. Other elements, steps, methods, and techniques that are insubstantially different from those described above and/or in the appended claims are also intended to be within the scope of the disclosure.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/470,259, filed Aug. 27, 2014, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/870,289, filed Aug. 27, 2013. The present application also claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/712,934, filed Jul. 31, 2018. The entire contents of each of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1682534 | Jean | Aug 1928 | A |
2448611 | Stanley | Sep 1948 | A |
2623566 | Kibler | Dec 1952 | A |
2784757 | Bosca et al. | Mar 1957 | A |
3079535 | Schultz | Feb 1963 | A |
3223898 | Bey | Dec 1965 | A |
3583729 | De Groot | Jun 1971 | A |
3749301 | Peckar | Jul 1973 | A |
3751839 | Mitchell | Aug 1973 | A |
3944069 | Eldridge, Jr. | Mar 1976 | A |
4018237 | Steiman | Apr 1977 | A |
4255837 | Holtz | Mar 1981 | A |
4388935 | Napolitane | Jun 1983 | A |
4588209 | Zebrowski et al. | May 1986 | A |
4589430 | Sussman | May 1986 | A |
4620725 | Maehashi | Nov 1986 | A |
4821751 | Chen | Apr 1989 | A |
5005697 | Jimbo et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5135012 | Kamen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5148916 | Tillyer, Sr. | Sep 1992 | A |
5328206 | Scott | Jul 1994 | A |
5375883 | Wyant | Dec 1994 | A |
5425160 | Krapf | Jun 1995 | A |
5575503 | Takahashi | Nov 1996 | A |
5682653 | Berglof et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702126 | Engel | Dec 1997 | A |
5709409 | Engel | Jan 1998 | A |
5984441 | Stokhuijzen | Nov 1999 | A |
6457239 | McLaughlin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6598752 | Davidov | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D482162 | Bostroem | Nov 2003 | S |
6793251 | Stark | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6831541 | Seidler | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6961977 | Seidler | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7070048 | Gelardi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089627 | Seidler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7404215 | Allen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7467440 | Seidler | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D601757 | Sagel | Oct 2009 | S |
7644489 | Arora | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8662086 | Kesselman | Mar 2014 | B2 |
D723742 | Shteysel | Mar 2015 | S |
9206630 | Kim | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9526309 | Huyke-Phillips | Dec 2016 | B2 |
10710390 | Good-Man | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20020153074 | Chen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020179485 | Shih | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030167599 | Seidler | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040134030 | Seidler | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040183313 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200755 | Gueret | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060027481 | Gelardi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065558 | Chang | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060124150 | McEvoy-Sherman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060231117 | Manougian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070049477 | Hester et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063004 | Weinberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070252377 | Ei-Sorroge | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100024271 | Seidler | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100031971 | Ha | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100089793 | Plassmeyer | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110061675 | McKinley | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110132508 | Castellucci | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155752 | Ha | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253167 | Shteysel | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120112448 | Lo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120200074 | Kuch et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130113584 | Hunts | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133686 | Shteysel | May 2013 | A1 |
20140034080 | Paquet et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140125047 | Thibierge et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140238434 | Blanch | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140299151 | Stroud | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150224806 | Good-Man | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150367671 | Song et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380141 | Mayfield | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170143099 | Carraro | May 2017 | A1 |
20170269634 | Ji | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180263361 | Langdon | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180335800 | Kim | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190059557 | Kehoe | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190075910 | Torres | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190110578 | Maurin | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190282039 | Lewis | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190374004 | Martins | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013531 | Tazbaz | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200039699 | Wu | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61870289 | Aug 2013 | US | |
62712934 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14470259 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 16358089 | US |