All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to methods and systems for neuromodulation. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems for achieving renal neuromodulation via thermal heating and/or cooling.
Congestive heart failure (“CHF”) is a condition typically caused by a structural or functional disorder of the heart and can impair the ability of the heart to fill itself or pump a sufficient amount of blood throughout a body (e.g., kidneys). It has been established in animal models that a heart failure condition can cause abnormally high sympathetic activation of the kidneys, which leads to decreased removal of water from the body, decreased removal of sodium, and increased secretion of renin. Increased renin secretion leads to vasoconstriction of blood vessels supplying the kidneys, which causes decreased renal blood flow. As a result, the reaction of the kidneys to heart failure can perpetuate a downward spiral of the heart failure condition. In addition, the kidneys also play a significant role in the progression of Chronic Renal Failure (“CRF”), End-Stage Renal Disease (“ESRD”), hypertension (pathologically high blood pressure), and other renal or cardio-renal diseases.
Reduction of sympathetic renal nerve activity (e.g., via denervation), can reverse these processes. Ardian, Inc. has developed methods and systems for treating renal disorders by applying an electric field to neural fibers that contribute to renal function. See, for example, Ardian, Inc.'s co-owned and co-pending U.S. Patent Application Nos. (a) Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, (b) Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, and (c) Ser. No. 11/363,867, filed Feb. 27, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. An electric field can initiate renal neuromodulation via denervation caused by irreversible electroporation, electrofusion, apoptosis, necrosis, ablation, thermal alteration, alteration of gene expression or another suitable modality. The electric field can be delivered from an apparatus positioned intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly, or a combination thereof. Additional methods and apparatus for achieving renal neuromodulation via localized drug delivery (e.g., by a drug pump or infusion catheter), the use of a stimulation electric field, and other modalities are described, for example, in co-owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,162,303 and 6,978,174, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Although these applications provide promising methods and systems, several improvements for enhancing the implementation of these methods and systems would be desirable.
A. Overview
The present disclosure provides methods and systems for controlling renal neuromodulation via thermal heating and/or thermal cooling mechanisms. Many embodiments of such methods and systems may reduce renal sympathetic nerve activity. Thermally-induced neuromodulation may be achieved by heating or cooling structures associated with renal neural activity via an apparatus positioned proximate to target neural fibers. For example, such an apparatus can be positioned (a) within renal vasculature (i.e., positioned intravascularly), (b) extravascularly, (c) intra-to-extravascularly, or (d) a combination thereof. Thermally-induced neuromodulation can be achieved by applying thermal stress to neural structures through either heating or cooling for influencing or altering these structures. Additionally or alternatively, the thermal neuromodulation can be due to, at least in part, alteration of vascular structures such as arteries, arterioles, capillaries, or veins that perfuse the target neural fibers or surrounding tissue.
As used herein, thermal heating mechanisms for neuromodulation include both thermal ablation and non-ablative thermal alteration or damage (e.g., via sustained heating or resistive heating). Thermal heating mechanisms may include raising the temperature of target neural fibers above a desired threshold to achieve non-ablative thermal alteration, or above a higher temperature to achieve ablative thermal alteration. For example, the target temperature can be above body temperature (e.g., approximately 37° C.) but less than about 45° C. for non-ablative thermal alteration, or the target temperature can be about 45° C. or higher for the ablative thermal alteration.
As used herein, thermal cooling mechanisms for neuromodulation include non-freezing thermal slowing of nerve conduction and/or non-freezing thermal nerve alteration, as well as freezing thermal nerve alteration. Thermal cooling mechanisms may include reducing the temperature of target neural fibers below a desired threshold, for example, below the body temperature of about 37° C. (e.g., below about 20° C.) to achieve non-freezing thermal alteration. Thermal cooling mechanisms also may include reducing the temperature of the target neural fibers below about 0° C., e.g., to achieve freezing thermal alteration.
In addition to monitoring or controlling the temperature during thermal neuromodulation, the length of exposure to thermal stimuli may be specified to affect an extent or degree of efficacy of the thermal neuromodulation. In many embodiments, the length of exposure to thermal stimuli is longer than instantaneous exposure. For example, the duration of exposure can be as short as about 5 seconds, or could be longer, such as about 30 seconds, or even longer than 2 minutes. In certain specific embodiments, the length of exposure can be less than 10 minutes, but this should in no way be construed as the upper limit of the exposure period. In other embodiments, the exposure can be intermittent or continuous to achieve the desired result. Exposure times measured in hours, days, or longer may be utilized to achieve desired thermal neuromodulation.
When conducting neuromodulation via thermal mechanisms, the temperature thresholds discussed previously may be determined as a function of the duration of exposure to thermal stimuli. Additionally or alternatively, the length of exposure may be determined as a function of the desired temperature threshold. These and other parameters may be specified or calculated to achieve and control desired thermal neuromodulation.
In some embodiments, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved by directly and/or indirectly applying thermal cooling or heating energy to the target neural fibers. For example, a chilled or heated fluid can be applied at least proximate to the target neural fiber, or heated or cooled elements (e.g., a thermoelectric element or a resistive heating element) can be placed in the vicinity of the neural fibers. In other embodiments, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via generation and/or application of the thermal energy to the target neural fibers, such as through application of a “thermal” energy field, including, electromagnetic energy, radiofrequency, ultrasound (including high-intensity focused ultrasound), microwave, light energy (including laser, infrared and near-infrared) etc., to the target neural fibers. For example, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via delivery of a pulsed or continuous thermal energy field to the target neural fibers. The energy field can be sufficient magnitude and/or duration to thermally induce the neuromodulation in the target fibers (e.g., to heat or thermally ablate or necrose the fibers). As described herein, additional and/or alternative methods and systems can also be used for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation.
When utilizing thermal heating mechanisms for thermal neuromodulation, protective cooling elements, such as conductive or convective cooling elements, optionally may be utilized to protect smooth muscle cells or other non-target tissue from undesired thermal effects during the thermally-induced renal neuromodulation. Likewise, when utilizing thermal cooling mechanisms, protective heating elements, such as conductive or convective heating elements, may be utilized to protect the non-target tissue. Non-target tissue additionally or alternatively may be protected by focusing the thermal heating or cooling energy on the target neural fibers so that the intensity of the thermal energy outside of the target zone is insufficient to induce undesired thermal effects in the non-target tissue. When thermal neuromodulation is achieved via thermal energy delivered intravascularly, the non-target tissue may be protected by utilizing blood flow as a conductive and/or convective heat sink that carries away excess thermal energy (hot or cold). For example, when blood flow is not blocked, the circulating blood may remove excess thermal energy from the non-target tissue during the procedure. The intravascularly-delivered thermal energy may heat or cool target neural fibers located proximate to the vessel to modulate the target neural fibers while blood flow within the vessel protects non-target tissue of the vessel wall from the thermal energy. For example, the thermal energy can target neural fibers within the adventitia to necrose or ablate the target fibers, and the blood flow can protect tissue in the vessel wall.
One drawback of using a continuous, intravascularly-delivered thermal energy therapy in the presence of blood flow to achieve desired intravascularly-induced neuromodulation is that the feasible thermal magnitude (e.g., power) and/or duration of the therapy may be limited or insufficient. This can be caused by the limited heat capacity of the blood flowing through the blood vessel to remove excess thermal energy from the vessel wall to mitigate damage or necrosis to the non-target tissue. Pulsed RF electric fields or other types of pulsed thermal energy may facilitate greater thermal magnitude (e.g., higher power), longer total duration and/or better controlled intravascular renal neuromodulation therapy compared to a continuous thermal energy therapy. For example, a pulsed thermal therapy may allow for monitoring of effects of the therapy on target or non-target tissue during the interval between the pulses. This monitoring data optionally may be used in a feedback loop to better control therapy, e.g., to determine whether to continue or stop treatment, and it may facilitate controlled delivery of a higher power or longer duration therapy.
Furthermore, the time interval between delivery of thermal energy pulses may facilitate additional convective or other cooling of the non-target tissue of the vessel wall compared to applying an equivalent magnitude or duration of continuous thermal energy. This may occur because blood flow through the blood vessel may convectively cool (heat) the non-target tissue of the vessel wall.
When providing a pulsed thermal therapy, this difference in the heat transfer rate between the tissue of the blood vessel wall and the relatively remote target neural fibers may be utilized to ablate, necrose, or otherwise modulate the target neural fibers without undesirably affecting the non-target tissue. The pulsed thermal energy therapy may be applied with greater thermal magnitude and/or of longer total duration (i.e., the cumulative duration of all thermal energy pulses within the therapy) than a continuous thermal therapy. Heat transfer from the vessel wall to the blood (or vice versa) during the off-time or low-energy interval between the thermal energy pulses facilitates the greater magnitude with moderated damage to the non-target tissue. For example, increasing thermal magnitude (e.g., higher power) may result in an increased rate of heating and, accordingly, a more effective thermal neuromodulation (e.g., ability to affect nerves further away from the lumen wall).
In addition, or as an alternative, to utilizing the patient's blood as a heat sink to establish the difference in heat transfer rate, a thermal fluid (hot or cold) may be injected, infused, or otherwise delivered into the vessel to remove excess thermal energy and protect the non-target tissues. The thermal fluid may, for example, comprise a saline or other biocompatible fluid that is heated, chilled, or at a room temperature. The thermal fluid may, for example, be injected through the device or through a guide catheter at a location upstream from an energy delivery element, or at other locations relative to the tissue for which protection is sought. The thermal fluid may be injected in the presence of blood flow or with the flow temporarily occluded.
Occlusion of flow in combination with thermal fluid delivery may facilitate improved control over the heat transfer kinetics in the non-target tissues. For example, the normal variability in blood flow rate between patients, which would vary the heat transfer capacity of the blood flow, may be controlled for by transferring thermal energy between the vessel wall and a thermal fluid that is delivered at a controlled rate. Use of injected thermal fluids to remove excess thermal energy from non-target tissues to relatively protect the non-target tissues during therapeutic treatment of target tissues may be utilized in body lumens other than blood vessels.
In some embodiments, methods and apparatuses for real-time monitoring of an extent or degree of neuromodulation or denervation (e.g., an extent or degree of thermal alteration) in tissue innervated by the target neural fibers and/or of thermal damage in the non-target tissue may be provided. Likewise, real-time monitoring of the thermal energy delivery element may be provided. Such methods and apparatuses may, for example, comprise a thermocouple or other temperature sensor for measuring the temperature of the monitored tissue or of the thermal energy delivery element. Other parameters that can be measured include the power, total energy delivered, nerve activity or impedance. Monitoring data may be used for feedback control of the thermal therapy. For example, intravascularly-delivered thermal therapy may be monitored and controlled by acquiring temperature or impedance measurements along the wall of the vessel in the vicinity of the treatment zone, and/or by limiting the power or duration of the therapy.
To better understand the structures of several embodiments of devices described below, as well as the methods of using such devices for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, a description of the renal anatomy in humans is provided.
B. Renal Anatomy Summary
As shown in
C. Embodiments of Systems and Methods for Thermally-Induced Renal Neuromodulation
The processor 114 can be any general purpose, programmable digital computing device including, for example, a personal computer, a Programmable Logic Controller, a Distributed Control System, or other computing device. The processor 114 can include a central processing unit (CPU), random access memory (RAM), non-volatile secondary storage (e.g., a hard drive, a floppy drive, and a CD-ROM drive), and network interfaces (e.g., a wired or wireless Ethernet card and a digital and/or analog input/output card). Program code and data can be loaded into the RAM from the non-volatile secondary storage and provided to the CPU for execution. The CPU can generate results for display, output, transmit, or storage.
The field generator 110 can generate electrical, radiofrequency, ultrasonic (including high intensity focused ultrasound), microwave, laser or other types of signals with desired parameters sufficient to thermally or otherwise induce renal neuromodulation in target neural fibers. For example, the field generator 110 can generate an electrical signal having a desired frequency, amplitude, and power level, and the cable 112 can transmit the generated signal to the probe 104. The processor 114 is in communication with the field generator 110 to control the power output of the field generator 110 for providing the desired amount of energy to the target neural structures. In the illustrated embodiment, the field generator 110 is located external to the patient 101. In other embodiments, however, the field generator 110 may be positioned internally within the patient.
The probe 104 can be a laparoscopic probe, a percutaneous probe, an intravascular catheter, or another suitable device configured for insertion in proximity to a track of a renal neural supply along and/or in the renal artery, renal vein, hilum, and/or Gerota's fascia under CT, radiographic, or another suitable guidance modality. The probe 104 can include at least one electrode 108 for delivery of a thermal energy field therapy and an electrical connector 106 coupled to the field generator 110 via the cable 112 for delivering a thermal energy field to the electrode 108. In some embodiments, the probe 104 can include an integrated cable (not shown) for delivering a thermal energy field to the electrode 108, and the electrical connector 106 can be omitted. In the illustrated embodiment, the probe 104 is a percutaneous probe configured to be percutaneously advanced into proximity of, for example, an anatomical target 102 (e.g., a renal artery or renal vein) of the patient 101 as described in more detail below with reference to
The electrode(s) 108 can be individual electrodes that are electrically independent of each other, a segmented electrode with commonly connected contacts, or a continuous electrode. A segmented electrode can, for example, be formed by providing a slotted tube fitted onto the electrode, or by electrically connecting a series of individual electrodes. Individual electrodes or groups of electrodes 108 can be configured to provide a bipolar signal. The electrodes 108 can be dynamically assignable to facilitate monopolar and/or bipolar energy delivery between any of the electrodes and/or between any of the electrodes and a remote electrode. The remote electrode may, for example, be attached externally to the patient's skin (e.g., to the patient's leg or flank).
The probe 104 can also include at least one sensor (not shown) for measuring a physiological parameter of the patient 101. For example, the probe 104 can include a temperature sensor, an impedance sensor, an ultrasound sensor, and/or other types of sensors. The sensor can measure the physiological parameter (e.g., a temperature) and transmit the measured physiological parameter to the processor 114 for processing.
Optionally, the system 100 can also include an input device 118, an output device 120, and/or a control panel 122 operatively coupled to the processor 114. The input device 118 can include a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, a push button, a switch, a potentiometer, and any other devices suitable for accepting user input. The output device 120 can include a display screen, a printer, a medium reader, an audio device, and any other devices suitable for providing user feedback. The control panel 122 can include indicator lights, numerical displays, and audio devices. In the embodiment shown in
In operation, an operator can place the probe 104 at least proximate to a wall of a body lumen of the patient 101, for example, the renal artery or renal vein, and then deliver energy to the probe 104 to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation as described in more detail below.
Referring to
Referring back to
In
The positioning element 304 optionally can position or otherwise drive the electrodes 306a-b into contact with the lumen wall. For example, when the positioning element 304 is an inflatable balloon as shown in
Furthermore, the positioning element 304 optionally may be utilized as a cooling element and/or a heating element. For example, the positioning element 304 may be inflated with a chilled fluid that serves as a heat sink for removing heat from tissue that contacts the element. Conversely, the positioning element 304 optionally may be a heating element by inflating it with a warmed fluid that heats tissue in contact with the element. The thermal fluid optionally may be circulated and/or exchanged within the positioning element 304 to facilitate more efficient conductive and/or convective heat transfer. Thermal fluids also may be used to achieve thermal neuromodulation via thermal cooling or heating mechanisms, as described in greater detail herein below.
The positioning element 304 (or any other portion of the apparatus 300) additionally or alternatively may comprise one or more sensors for monitoring the process. In one embodiment, the positioning element 304 has a wall-contact thermocouple 310 (
The electrodes 306a-b of the intravascular embodiment shown in
As shown in
Once the positioning element 304 is at a desired location within the renal vasculature, it can be expanded into contact with an interior wall of the vessel. A thermal energy field then may be delivered via the electrodes 306a-b across the wall of the artery. The field thermally modulates the activity along neural fibers that contribute to renal function via heating. In several embodiments, the thermal modulation at least partially denervates the kidney innervated by the neural fibers via heating. This may be achieved, for example, via thermal ablation or non-ablative alteration of the target neural fibers.
In the embodiment shown in
Using the patient's blood as a heat sink is expected to facilitate delivery of longer or greater magnitude thermal treatments with reduced risk of undesired effects to the non-target tissue, which may enhance the efficacy of the treatment at the target neural fibers. Although the embodiment shown in
One drawback of using a continuous, intravascularly-delivered thermal energy therapy in the presence of blood flow to achieve desired intravascularly-induced neuromodulation is that the feasible thermal magnitude (e.g., power) and/or duration of the therapy may be limited or insufficient. This can occur because the capacity of the blood to remove heat is limited, and thus the blood flowing through the blood vessel may not remove enough excess thermal energy from the vessel wall to mitigate or avoid undesirable effect in the non-target tissue. Use of a pulsed thermal energy therapy, such as a pulsed thermal RF electric field, may facilitate greater thermal magnitude (e.g., higher power), longer total duration, and/or better controlled intravascular renal neuromodulation therapy compared to a continuous thermal energy therapy. For example, the effects of the therapy on target or non-target tissue may be monitored during the intervals between the pulses. This monitoring data optionally may be used in a feedback loop to better control the therapy, e.g., to determine whether to continue or stop treatment, and it may facilitate controlled delivery of a higher power or longer duration therapy.
Furthermore, the off-time or low-energy intervals between thermal energy pulses may facilitate additional convective or other cooling of the non-target tissue of the vessel wall compared to use of a continuous thermal therapy of equivalent magnitude or duration. This can occur because blood flow through the blood vessel can convectively cool (heat) the non-target tissue of the vessel wall faster than the target neural fibers positioned outside of the vessel wall.
When providing a pulsed thermal therapy, the difference in heat transfer rates between tissue of the blood vessel wall and the relatively remote target neural fibers may be utilized to ablate, necrose, or otherwise modulate the target neural fibers without producing undesirable effects in the non-target tissue. As a result, the pulsed thermal energy therapy may be applied with greater thermal magnitude and/or of longer total duration (i.e., the cumulative duration of all thermal energy pulses) compared to a continuous thermal therapy. The higher heat transfer rate at the vessel wall during the intervals between the thermal energy pulses facilitates the greater magnitude/longer duration delivery.
In addition or as an alternative to utilizing the patient's blood as a heat sink to create a difference in the heat transfer rate, a thermal fluid (hot or cold) may be injected, infused or otherwise delivered into the vessel to remove excess thermal energy and protect the non-target tissues. The thermal fluid may, for example, comprise saline or another biocompatible fluid that is heated, chilled or at room temperature. The thermal fluid may, for example, be injected through the device or through a guide catheter at a location upstream from an energy delivery element, or at other locations relative to the tissue for which protection is sought. The thermal fluid may be injected in the presence of blood flow or with the blood flow temporarily occluded.
In several embodiments, the occlusion of the blood flow in combination with thermal fluid delivery may facilitate good control over the heat transfer kinetics. For example, the normal variability in blood flow rate between patients, which would vary the heat transfer capacity of the blood flow, may be controlled for by transferring thermal energy between the vessel wall and a thermal fluid that is delivered at a controlled rate. Furthermore, this method of using an injected thermal fluid to remove excess thermal energy from non-target tissues in order to protect the non-target tissues during therapeutic treatment of target tissues may be utilized in body lumens other than blood vessels.
One or more sensors, such as the thermocouple 310 of
As discussed previously, when utilizing intravascular apparatus to achieve thermal neuromodulation, in addition or as an alternative to central positioning of the electrode(s) within a blood vessel, the electrode(s) optionally may be configured to contact an internal wall of the blood vessel. Wall-contact electrode(s) may facilitate more efficient transfer of a thermal energy field across the vessel wall to target neural fibers, as compared to centrally-positioned electrode(s). In some embodiments, the wall-contact electrode(s) may be delivered to the vessel treatment site in a reduced profile configuration, then expanded in vivo to a deployed configuration wherein the electrode(s) contact the vessel wall. In some embodiments, expansion of the electrode(s) is at least partially reversible to facilitate retrieval of the electrode(s) from the patient's vessel.
As shown in
After terminating the electric field, the electrode 306a′ may be returned to a reduced profile and the apparatus 500 may be removed from the patient or repositioned in the vessel. For example, the positioning element 304 may be collapsed (e.g., deflated), and the electrode 306a′ may be contracted by withdrawing the catheter 302 within the guide catheter 303. Alternatively, the electrode 306a′ may be fabricated from a shape-memory material biased to the collapsed configuration, such that the electrode self-collapses upon collapse of the positioning element 304.
Although the electrode 306a′ shown in
A bipolar electric field may be delivered between the proximal and distal wall contact electrodes 306a′ and 306b′, or a monopolar electric field may be delivered between the proximal electrode 306a′ and/or distal electrode 306b′ and an external ground. Having both the proximal and distal electrodes 306a′ and 306b′ in contact with the wall of the vessel may facilitate more efficient energy transfer across the wall during delivery of a thermal energy field, as compared to having one or both of the proximal and distal electrodes 306a′ and 306b′ centered within the vessel.
As discussed previously, in addition or as an alternative to utilizing the patient's blood as a heat sink to create different heat transfer rates between target neural fibers and non-target tissue of the wall of the vessel within which thermal energy is delivered, a thermal fluid (hot or cold) may be injected, infused or otherwise delivered into the vessel. The thermal fluid may further remove excess thermal energy and protect the non-target tissues. When delivering thermal therapy via heating, the thermal fluid may, for example, comprise chilled or room temperature saline (e.g., saline at a temperature lower than the temperature of the vessel wall during the therapy delivery). The thermal fluid may be injected through the device catheter or through a guide catheter at a location upstream from an energy delivery element, or at other locations relative to the tissue for which protection is sought. The thermal fluid may be injected in the presence of blood flow or with blood flow temporarily occluded. The occlusion of blood flow in combination with thermal fluid delivery may facilitate good control over the heat transfer kinetics along the non-target tissues, as well as injection of fluid from a downstream location.
As shown in
To increase the power that may be delivered or the duration of the thermal treatment without undesirably affecting non-target tissue, a thermal fluid infusate I can be injected through injection port 805 of the catheter 802 to cool the non-target tissue. This is expected to mitigate undesired effects in the non-target tissue. The infusate I, for example, can include chilled saline that removes excess thermal energy from the wall of the vessel during thermal therapy.
Convective or other heat transfer between the non-target vessel wall tissue and the infusate I may facilitate cooling (or heating) of the vessel wall at a faster rate than cooling (or heating) occurs at the target neural fibers. This difference in the heat transfer rates between the wall of the vessel and the target neural fibers may be utilized to modulate the neural fibers. Furthermore, when utilizing a pulsed thermal therapy, the accelerated heat transfer at the wall relative to the neural fibers may allow for relatively higher energy or longer duration therapies (as compared to continuous thermal therapies). Also, the interval between pulses may be used to monitor and/or control effects of the therapy.
Upon expansion of the elongated member, the catheter 852 is deflected such that the electrode 856 coupled to the catheter shaft contacts the vessel wall. Optionally, the positioning element 804 may be expanded to facilitate positioning of the electrode 856 via the elongated member 857 and/or to block flow through the vessel. The positioning element 804 can be coupled to the guide or delivery catheter 803. Infusate I optionally may be delivered through the catheter 852 as shown.
As best seen in the reduced profiled configuration of
Referring back to
The probe 900 can have a working or effective length L2 of from about 55 cm to about 140 cm. As used herein, “working length” and “effective length” are defined as the length of the probe 900 (e.g., the shaft 904, the intermediate portion 908, and the electrode 906) that will fit inside a patient's body. In configurations where a 55 cm guide catheter is used to facilitate delivery of the probe 900, the working or effective length may be from about 60 cm to about 80 cm. In configurations where a 90 cm guide catheter is used to facilitate delivery of the probe 900, the working or effective length may be from about 95 cm to about 120 cm. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the probe 900 has a working or effective length L2 of about 108 cm and is configured for use with a sheath 910 having a length of about 90 cm. In other embodiments, however, the probe 900 can have a different working length L2 and/or be configured for use with a sheath having a different dimension and/or configuration.
The electrode 906 includes a band 914 constructed from a first metal (e.g., platinum or iridium) and a second metal 916 disposed inside the band 914. The band 914 can be generally cylindrical or have another suitable shape. The second metal 916 can be the same as the first metal, or the second metal 916 can be a different metal or metal alloy. The wires are electrically coupled to one another. For example, the wires can be electrically connected directly or connected via the first and/or second metal. Thus, the electrode 906 can deliver an electric field supplied from the field generator 110 via the wires 112a-b to the wall of the body lumen. In an alternative embodiment, a single wire is used instead of a pair of wires.
The electrode 906 can also measure temperature (via a thermocouple or thermistor, or other temperature sensing elements), impedance or another parameter while delivering the electric field to the tissue. For example, voltage and current of the supplied electric field can be measured, and a resistance or impedance can be calculated according to Ohm's law.
One expected advantage of an embodiment where only impedance is measured is that only one wire is needed for the probe 900. If the probe 900 includes a temperature sensor electrically connected to the electrode, then at least one more wire must be used. In this case, a total of two wires can be used to deliver energy, measure impedance and measure temperature. If the probe 900 includes a temperature sensor electrically independent from the electrode then at least one more wire must be used. Additionally, more than one temperature sensors may be used to make additional temperature measurements. The additional wires can add to the size and complexity of the probe 900 and increase the potential for a malfunction.
Although the illustrated electrode 906 includes the band 914, the electrode 906 can have other configurations. For example, the electrode 906 can include a coil constructed from a first metal wrapped around a core constructed from a second metal. One expected advantage of having a coil is that the coil can reduce stress due to heat expansion when measuring temperature. In another embodiment, the electrode can be formed from a single metal or other conductor without the band.
The intermediate portion 908 is also configured to locate the electrode 906 at a dimension X from a distal portion 904b of the shaft 904. The dimension X can vary based, at least in part, on the material of which the intermediate portion 908 is composed (e.g., stainless steel or nitinol) and the desired working or effective length for the probe 900. For example, the dimension X of the intermediate portion 908 should be configured and sized to provide sufficient wall contact pressure such that the electrode 906 can create the desired treatment effect.
In alternative embodiments, a pull or push wire can be used to actively flex the intermediate portion to facilitate placement of the electrode. For example, as illustrated in
Referring back to
The electrode 906 has an outer diameter E of from about 0.020 inches to about 0.085 inches. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the electrode 906 has an outer diameter E of about 0.049 inches. These dimensions can vary, however, from a practical standpoint, the outer diameter E of the electrode 906 can be no bigger than the inner diameter of the sheath or guide catheter (e.g., the sheath 910) through which the electrode 906 is delivered. In one particular example, an 8 French guide catheter (which has an inner diameter of 0.091 inches) would likely be the largest catheter used to access the renal artery. Thus, an electrode used in this situation would have an outer diameter E at least approximately less than 0.085 inches.
In an alternative embodiment, the catheter can be configured such that the sheath does not cover the entire electrode, but is rather used only to substantially straighten the intermediate portion of the catheter to facilitate delivery to the treatment location. In such configurations, the distal end of the sheath will abut the proximal end of the electrode. Accordingly, it would not be necessary for the electrode size to be limited by the inner diameter of the sheath.
It should be understood that in any of the embodiments disclosed herein, a guide wire can be optionally employed to facilitate delivery and/or removal of the probe. In such embodiments, the probe may be additionally configured with structural enhancements (e.g., guide wire lumen) for accommodating the use of a guide wire.
Additionally or alternatively, the apparatus 950 can include multiple angularly spaced electrodes 906 positioned within the vasculature, as shown in
In addition to extravascular and intravascular systems for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, intra-to-extravascular systems may be provided. The intra-to-extravascular systems may, for example, have electrode(s) that are delivered to an intravascular position, and then at least partially passed through/across the vessel wall to an extravascular position prior to delivery of a thermal energy field. Intra-to-extravascular positioning of the electrode(s) may place the electrode(s) in closer proximity to target neural fibers for delivery of a thermal energy field, as compared to fully intravascular positioning of the electrode(s). Applicants have previously described intra-to-extravascular pulsed electric field systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/324,188, filed Dec. 29, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The catheter 922 includes an optional expandable positioning element 930. The positioning element 930 can include, for example, an inflatable balloon or an expandable basket or cage. In use, the positioning element 930 may be expanded prior to deployment of the needle electrodes 928 and 929 to position or center the catheter 922 within the patient's vessel (e.g., within renal artery RA). Centering the catheter 922 is expected to facilitate delivery of all needle electrodes 928 and 929 to desired depths within/external to the patient's vessel (e.g., to deliver all of the needle electrodes 928 and 929 to approximately the same depth). In the embodiment illustrated in
As shown in
The proximal electrodes 928 can be connected to a field generator (not shown) as active electrodes, and the distal electrodes 929 can serve as return electrodes. In this manner, the proximal and distal electrodes 928 and 929 form bipolar electrode pairs that align the thermal energy field with a longitudinal axis or direction of the patient's vasculature. The distal electrodes 929 alternatively may comprise the active electrodes and the proximal electrodes 928 may comprise the return electrodes. Furthermore, the proximal electrodes 928 and/or the distal electrodes 929 may both comprise active and return electrodes. Further still, the proximal electrodes 928 and/or the distal electrodes 929 may be utilized in combination with an external ground for delivery of a monopolar thermal energy field. Any combination of active and distal electrodes may be utilized.
When the electrodes 928 and 929 are connected to a field generator and positioned extravascularly (and with the positioning element 930 optionally expanded) delivery of the thermal energy field can provide the desired renal neuromodulation via heating. After achievement of the desired thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, the electrodes 928 and 929 can be retracted within the proximal and distal lumens, and the positioning element 930 can be collapsed for retrieval. The ITEV system 900 can then be removed from the patient to complete the procedure. Additionally or alternatively, the system 900, or any system disclosed herein, may be repositioned to provide therapy at another treatment site, such as to provide bilateral renal neuromodulation.
Cooling elements, such as convective cooling elements, may be utilized to protect non-target tissues like smooth muscle cells from thermal alteration during thermally-induced renal neuromodulation via heat generation. Non-target tissues may be protected by focusing the thermal energy on the target neural fibers such that an intensity of the thermal energy is insufficient to induce thermal alteration in non-target tissues distant from the target neural fibers.
Although
The embodiments described above with reference to
In addition or as alternative to injection of a thermal fluid to the target neural fibers through infusion needles 1028 and 1029, an alternative neuromodulatory agent, such as a drug or medicament, may be injected to modulate, necrose or otherwise block or reduce transmission along the target neural fibers. Examples of alternative neuromodulatory agents include, but are not limited to, phenol and neurotoxins, such as botulinum toxin. Additional neuromodulatory agents, per se known, will be apparent to those of skill in the art.
An electric current is passed from the power supply 1104 to the thermoelectric element of the cuff 1102. The thermoelectric element can include two different metals (e.g., a p-type and an n-type semiconductor) that are connected to each other at two junctions. The current induces a thermal gradient between the two junctions, such that one junction cools while the other is heated. Reversal of the polarity of the voltage applied across the two junctions reverses the direction of the thermal gradient. Either the hot side or the cold side of the thermoelectric element faces radially inward in order to heat or cool, respectively, the target neural fibers that travel along the renal artery to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation. Optionally, the radially outward surface of the thermoelectric element may be insulated to reduce a risk of thermal alteration to the non-target tissues. The cuff 1102 may include one or more temperature sensors, such as thermocouples, for monitoring the temperature of the target neural fibers and/or of the non-target tissues, wherein the monitored data may be used as feedback to control the delivery of therapy.
The pump 1202 can further include one or more thermoelectric or other thermal elements in heat exchange contact with the fluid reservoir for cooling or heating the fluid that is transferred to the cuff 1204 to thermally modulate the target neural fibers. The apparatus 1200 optionally may have controls for automatic or manual control of fluid heating or cooling, as well as fluid circulation within the cuff 1204. Furthermore, the apparatus 1200 may include a temperature and/or renal sympathetic neural activity monitoring or feedback control. Although the apparatus 1200 of
Thermal renal neuromodulation alternatively may be achieved via pulsed or continuous high-intensity focused ultrasound. Furthermore, the ultrasound may be delivered over a full 360° (e.g. when delivered intravascularly) or over a radial segment of less than 360° (e.g., when delivered intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly, or a combination thereof).
The focal distance may be specified or dynamically variable such that the ultrasonic wave is focused at a desired depth on target neural fibers outside of the vessel. For example, a family of catheter sizes may be provided to allow for a range of specified focal distances. A dynamically variable focal distance may be achieved, for example, via calibrated expansion of the balloon 1306.
Focusing the ultrasound wave may produce a reverse thermal gradient that protects the non-target tissues and selectively affect the target neural fibers to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation via heating. As a result, the temperature at the vessel wall may be less than the temperature at the target tissue.
The systems described above with respect to
It should be understood that any of the methods, apparatuses, and systems disclosed herein can be modified or configured for cooling or freezing treatments which modulate neural fibers. For example, any of the probes disclosed herein can be modified to deliver cryotherapy to the target neural fibers with either an intravascular, extravascular or ITEV approach.
D. Modules and Methods for Controlling Thermally-Induced Renal Neuromodulation
With the treatments disclosed herein for delivering therapy to target tissue, it may be beneficial for energy to be delivered to the target neural structures in a controlled manner. The controlled delivery of energy will allow the zone of thermal treatment to extend into the renal fascia while minimizing undesirable energy delivery or thermal effects to the vessel wall. A controlled delivery of energy may also result in a more consistent, predictable and efficient overall treatment. Accordingly, it may be beneficial to incorporate a controller or computer system having programmed instructions for delivering energy to tissue into the energy delivery system. Additionally, these programmed instructions may comprise an algorithm for automating the controlled delivery of energy. Alternatively, the delivery of energy to target tissue can be controlled manually by an operator or the physician administering treatment.
In one embodiment, for example, a controller can command a power generator (e.g., the field generator 110 of
As illustrated in
When it is determined that one or more parameters or multiple parameters in combination fall outside a predetermined parameter profile, then the method 1600 calls for an adjustment to the system's power output at stage 1606. The direction (i.e., increase or decrease) and degree of the power output adjustment can be determined by a routine utilizing the monitored parameters and how they compare against other predetermined parameter profiles. For example, if temperature and time are monitored and it is determined that the monitored temperature and time exceed a predetermined parameter profile of temperature and time, then power delivery may be reduced. Alternatively, if one or more monitored parameters or multiple monitored parameters in combination falls short of a predetermined parameter profile, then power delivery may be increased. As shown in
The operating parameters monitored in accordance with the algorithm may include temperature, time, impedance, and power. Discrete values in temperature may be used to trigger changes in energy delivery. For example, high values in temperature (e.g. 85° C.) could indicate tissue desiccation in which case the algorithm may decrease or stop the energy delivery to prevent undesirable thermal effects to target or non-target tissue. Time may also be used to prevent undesirable thermal alteration to non-target tissue. For each treatment, a set time (e.g., 2 minutes) is checked to prevent indefinite delivery of energy. Impedance may be used to measure tissue changes. Impedance indicates the electrical property of the treatment site. If a thermal inductive, electric field is applied to the treatment site the impedance will decrease as the tissue cells become less resistive to current flow. If too much energy is applied, tissue desiccation or coagulation may occur near the electrode which would increase the impedance as the cells lose water retention and/or the electrode surface area decreases (e.g., via the accumulation of coagulum). Thus, an increase in tissue impedance may be indicative or predictive of undesirable thermal alteration to target or non-target tissue. Additionally, power is an effective parameter to monitor in controlling the delivery of therapy. Power is a function of voltage and current. The algorithm may tailor the voltage and/or current to achieve a desired power. Derivatives of the aforementioned parameters (e.g., rates of change) can also be used to trigger change in energy delivery. For example, the rate of change in temperature could be monitored such that power output is reduced in the event that a sudden rise in temperature is detected.
To implement the aforementioned control algorithm, the system may include one or more computing system hardware and/or software modules. Alternatively, computer hardware and software can be utilized to facilitate any energy delivery process or system.
In operation, the input module 1622 accepts operator input, such as process setpoint and control selections, and communicates the accepted information or selections to other components for further processing. The database module 1624 organizes records, including an operating parameter 1634, an operator activity 1636, and one or more alarms 1638, and the database module 1624 facilitates storing and retrieving of these records to and from a database 1632. Any type of database organization can be utilized, including a flat file system, hierarchical database, relational database, or distributed database, such as those provided by Oracle Corporation of Redwood Shores, Calif.
The process module 1626 can process the sensor readings 1640 (e.g., from the sensors 310 in
The sensing module 1650 can receive and convert the sensor readings 1640 into parameters in desired units. For example, the sensing module 1650 can receive the sensor readings 1640 as electrical signals and convert the electrical signals into instant temperatures in Celsius. The sensing module 1650 can have routines including, for example, linear interpolation, logarithmic interpolation, data mapping, or other routines to associate the sensor readings 1640 to parameters in desired units.
The calculation module 1652 can perform various types of calculation to facilitate operation of other modules. For example, the calculation module 1652 can derive an average temperature based on the measured temperatures over a period of time according to the following formula:
where Ti is a measured temperature, Tavg is the average temperature, and N is the number of temperature records. Other averaging techniques, such as an exponential moving average can also be used. The calculation module 466 can also derive a rate of change for the measured temperature according to the following formula:
where Ti+1 is the temperature record number i+1, Ti is the previous temperature record, and Δt is the time difference between the two temperature records.
The alarm module 1654 can generate alarms based on output from the calculation module 1652 and/or the sensing module 1650. For example, the alarm module 1654 can compare the average or instantaneous temperature calculated in the calculation module 1652 to a preset threshold value (i.e., predetermined parameter profile). If the average or instantaneous temperature exceeds the threshold value, the alarm module 1654 can issue an alarm by raising an alarm flag or another type of response. In response to the alarm flag, the output device 120 (
The power output module 1656 can generate the output signals 1642 to the field generator 110 (
The interlock module 1658 continuously monitors operating parameters received from the sensing module 1650 and/or the calculation module 1652, and the interlock module 1658 can control operation of the power output module 1656 when the monitored operating parameters exceed certain interlock threshold values. Depending on the interlock condition, the power output module 1656 can set a power setpoint above or below the current setpoint (i.e., increase or decrease power) or it can set a power setpoint of zero (i.e., terminate power delivery). For example, the interlock module 1658 can cause the power output module 1656 to reduce the power output when the average temperature from the calculation module 1652 exceeds a preset value. Additionally or alternatively, the interlock module can cause the power output module 1656 to terminate its operation (i.e., having a zero output value) when the instant temperature from the sensing module 1650 exceeds another preset value. In several embodiments, the interlock module 1658 can optionally be configured to directly generate output signals 1642 to the other system components.
In certain embodiments, the process module 1626 can include additional modules. For example, the process module 1626 can include a configuration module for configuring any one of the sensing module 1650, the calculation module 1652, the alarm module 1654, the power output module 1656, and/or the interlock module 1658.
The process module 1626 can also include control modules for controlling selected process parameters. For example, the process module 1626 can include proportional-integral-derivative (PID) modules for maintaining a process parameter (e.g., the measured temperature) at a desired value. The process module 1626 can also include one or more PID modules that attempt to maintain one process parameter (e.g., temperature) unless limited by other process parameters (e.g., maximum power or impedance values). The process module 1626 can also include feed-forward modules in addition to the PID modules for improved control. For example, the feed-forward modules can calculate an expected power level based on the measured temperature, the heat conductance, and/or other parameters of the wall of the body lumen. The expected power level can then be combined with the output of the PID modules to compensate for any delayed response.
To better understand the methods described above with reference to
As illustrated in
After the first time period expires (or after the power level at P1, has been achieved), the power output module 1656 can command the field generator 110 to maintain its current output power level at P1, i.e., pause for a second time period (t1−t2). An operator or preprogrammed routine can adjust the time period (t1−t2) based on the patient's physiological characteristics. For example, if the patient's body lumen is slow in responding to temperature changes, then the operator or preprogrammed routine can increase the time period (t1−t12) to compensate for the additional response delay. In other embodiments, the power output module 1656 may cause the field generator 110 to reduce the output level to less than P1 or momentarily terminate its output level during the second time period (t1−t2) or any other time period (e.g., the first time period or subsequent time periods).
After the second time period expires, the calculation module 1652 can derive an average temperature at the end of the second time period, i.e., t2, based on the temperature from the sensing module 1650. The method 1600 can continue with a test to determine whether the calculated average temperature at 12 exceeds a preset threshold (e.g., 65° C.). If the average temperature exceeds the preset threshold, then the power output module 1656 can command the field generator 110 to maintain its current output power level for a desired total treatment time.
If the average temperature does not exceed the preset threshold, then the method 1600 can continue at stage 1606 with the power level P1 being increased by an amount ΔP from Pi. In one embodiment, ΔP can be a predetermined fixed amount (e.g., 0.5 watts). In other embodiments, ΔP can be a variable amount. For example, the difference between the average temperature and a maximum temperature threshold can determine ΔP according to the following formula:
ΔP=k×(Tmax−Tavg)
where k is a user-selected or predetermined constant, Tmax is the maximum temperature threshold, and Tavg is the average temperature.
The method 1600 can continue with another test to determine whether the increased power level (P1+ΔP) exceeds a maximum power level (e.g., 10 watts) for the field generator 110. An operator or preprogrammed routine can select the maximum power level to represent a safe or preferred operating mode and adjust the selected power level based on treatment conditions. If the maximum power level is exceeded, then power output module 1656 commands the field generator 110 to maintain its current output power level until a desired total treatment time is reached. If the maximum power level is not exceeded, then the process returns to pausing, and the subsequent stages are repeated. Although the specific example of the method 1600 described above uses the measured temperature as a process parameter, other physiological parameters (e.g., impedance, resistivity, and/or capacitance) and non-physiological parameters (e.g., time, power, etc.) can be used instead of or in addition to the measured temperature.
Optionally, the calculation module 1652 can calculate the number of cycles before the maximum power level is reached. For example, when a fixed ΔP is used, the calculation module 1652 can calculate the number of cycles according to the following formula:
where Pmax, is the maximum power level, and n is the number of cycles.
After the ramp up process terminates, the power output module 1656 can still command the field generator 110 to modify its power output level based on the calculated average temperature, the rate of change of the measured temperature, the rate of change in impedance, and/or other parameters. For example, as discussed below, the power output module 1656 can command the field generator 110 to discretely or continuously decrease its power output level when the measured temperature is increasing at a rate exceeding a rate of change threshold or when the measured instant temperature exceeds another preset threshold.
The method 1600 can also optionally include a ramping process that allows the power level to be increased at a faster rate. For example, the method 1600 can include a test to check the average temperature and determine if it is below a preselected threshold (e.g., 50 C). If the average temperature is below the threshold, then the power output module 1656 can command the field generator 110 to increase the power level Pi by an amount equal to ΔP×F where F is a step factor (e.g., 2). The test can be repeated at the start of each ramp stage or at other selected points in the ramping process. The rapid ramping process is expected to allow the power output level to reach its desired treatment level more quickly. In another embodiment where a PID module is used to control power output, the PID module can be tuned to rapidly ramp up power when the measured temperature is far below a specified level (e.g., 65 C) but slow down the power ramping as the measured temperature approaches the specified level.
The method 1600 can also optionally include a power reduction process to incrementally step down or ramp down the power level during treatment. The example described above specifically tailors the power output process to reduce the risk of overheating the walls of the patient's body lumen via temperature monitoring. In the case where the maximum power level is reached, the temperature and/or the measured impedance may continue to rise beyond a certain threshold. In many cases, exceeding such thresholds could be an indicator that an alarm threshold could be reached where power output would be terminated. The method described below, however, can be used to decrease power to prevent a premature termination of power delivery due to temperature and/or impedance reaching an alarm threshold.
During power delivery, the interlock module 1658 can continuously monitor one or more operating parameters received from the sensing module 1650 and/or the calculation module 1652. For example, this method can include a test to determine whether the calculated average temperature is greater than or equal to a preset threshold Tt (e.g., 70° C.). If the average temperature does not exceed the preset threshold Tt, then the interlock module 1658 does not interrupt operation of the power output module 1656 and the current power output level is maintained for treatment.
On the other hand, if the average temperature (from the calculation module 1652) exceeds the preset threshold Tt, then the method can continue with stage 1606 in which the power level is reduced. During this power reduction stage, the power output module 1656 can command the field generator to immediately decrease power by Ps (e.g., 1 watt). After decreasing the power, the method can pause the power output module 1656 for a time period Tw (e.g., 3 seconds). After the time period Tw expires, the calculation module 1652 can again derive an average temperature based on the temperature from the sensing module 1650. The method can continue with another test at to determine whether the calculated average temperature still exceeds the preset threshold Tt. In some cases, this power reduction process may need to be repeated several times, decreasing power by Ps each time, until the average temperature does not exceed the preset threshold. If the average temperature does not exceed the threshold, the method can continue with a sustained power stage for the duration of the treatment time.
In another aspect of this embodiment, the method can include a test to determine whether an increase or rate of increase in impedance is too large. More specifically, the interlock module 1658 can measure the slope of the impedance over a fixed period of time. If the measured slope does not exceed a preset threshold, then the interlock module 1658 does not adjust operation of the power output module 1656, and the method can continue with a sustained power level. However, if the measured slope is greater than a preset threshold Zs (e.g., 3 ohms per second), then the method can proceed to the power reduction described above. As mentioned above, the power reduction process may need to be repeated several times until the measured slope does not exceed the preset threshold Zs. An operator or preprogrammed routine can adjust the preset thresholds Tt and Zs or the power reduction rate based on the patient's physiological characteristics and/or one or more desired treatment parameters.
In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the interlock module 1658 can continuously monitor the impedance and, if at any point during treatment the impedance rises above a minimum impedance plus a preselected threshold, the power output can be decreased until the impedance value is within the desired range. If the impedance value does not change to be within the desired range or continues to rise above an alarm threshold, then power delivery can be terminated.
In further detail, this method can include a test to compare the measured impedance value with a preselected minimum impedance value. If the measured impedance value is less than the preselected minimum impedance value, the minimum value is updated to be equal to the measured value. These stages can be repeated any number of times as necessary during treatment. In effect, the method keeps track of the lowest impedance value measured by the system.
If the measured impedance is greater than the minimum impedance value plus a preselected threshold value Zd (e.g., 20 ohms), then the method can continue to the power reduction process as described above. After decreasing the power, the method can pause the power output module 1656 for a time period Tw2 (e.g., 3 seconds). After the time period Tw2 expires, the interlock module 1658 can again monitor impedance and, if the measured impedance value is still greater than the minimum impedance value plus the threshold value, the method can repeat the power reduction process any number of times as necessary until the impedance condition does not occur, and then return to the sustained power stage.
One expected advantage of the methods 1600 and the various embodiments described above is the reduced risk of undesirable treatment effects to target and non-target tissue (e.g., excessively damaging the wall of the body lumen). As described above with reference to
It is expected that thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, whether delivered extravascularly, intravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof, may alleviate clinical symptoms of CHF, hypertension, renal disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, contrast nephropathy and/or other renal or cardio-renal diseases for a period of months (potentially up to six months or more). This time period may be sufficient to allow the body to heal; for example, this period may reduce the risk of CHF onset after an acute myocardial infarction to thereby alleviate a need for subsequent re-treatment. Alternatively, as symptoms reoccur, or at regularly scheduled intervals, the patient may receive repeat therapy. Thermally-induced renal neuromodulation also may systemically reduce sympathetic tone.
While the therapies disclosed herein relate to modulating nerves that contribute to renal function via denervation, it should be understood that the methods, apparatuses, and systems disclosed herein can be configured and/or modified for therapeutic energy transfer with other locations within the body. For example, these inventions can be modified for the purposes of energy delivery within a body lumen (e.g., a peripheral blood vessel) to achieve denervation or some other therapeutic result.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the invention. Where the context permits, singular or plural terms may also include the plural or singular term, respectively. Moreover, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in reference to a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Additionally, the term “comprising” is used throughout to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature and/or additional types of other features are not precluded. It will also be appreciated that specific embodiments have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/132,424, filed on Apr. 19, 2016. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/132,424 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/147,191, filed on Jun. 26, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,345,900, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/159,306, filed on Jun. 26, 2008, now abandoned, which is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2007/072396, filed on Jun. 28, 2007, which claims the benefit and priority of the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: (a) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/880,340, filed on Jan. 12, 2007; and (b) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/816,999, filed on Jun. 28, 2006. International Application No. PCT/US2007/072396 is also a continuation-in-part of the following United States Patent Applications: (c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/599,723, filed on Nov. 14, 2006, now abandoned; and (d) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/504,117, filed on Aug. 14, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,617,005. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/132,424 is also related to each of the following United States patent applications: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,145,316, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application No. (a) Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,653,438, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/616,254, filed on Oct. 5, 2004, and 60/624,793, filed on Nov. 2, 2004; (b) Ser. No. 10/900,199 filed on Jul. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,174, and (c) Ser. No. 10/408,665, filed on Apr. 8, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,303. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4602624 | Naples et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603704 | Mund et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4649936 | Ungar et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4709698 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4738812 | Raynal | Apr 1988 | A |
4764504 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4890623 | Cook et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5191883 | Lennox et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5300068 | Rosar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5423610 | Goble et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423744 | Gencheff et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423806 | Edwards et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425364 | Imran | Jun 1995 | A |
5437662 | Nardella | Aug 1995 | A |
5437664 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5472443 | Cordis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484400 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496312 | Klicek | Mar 1996 | A |
5540681 | Strul et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540684 | Hassler | Jul 1996 | A |
5562721 | Marchlinski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571147 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573533 | Strul | Nov 1996 | A |
5584830 | Ladd et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588964 | Imran et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599345 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5626576 | Janssen | May 1997 | A |
5658619 | Kroll | Aug 1997 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5688266 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697882 | Eggers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697925 | Taylor | Dec 1997 | A |
5700282 | Zabara | Dec 1997 | A |
5702386 | Stern et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707400 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5735846 | Panescu et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743003 | Stern et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755715 | Stern et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769847 | Panescu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772590 | Webster, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810802 | Panescu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817092 | Behl | Oct 1998 | A |
5817093 | Williamson, IV et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868737 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871481 | Kannenberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5907589 | Cosman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893885 | Webster, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906614 | Stern et al. | May 1999 | A |
5941869 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954719 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957969 | Warner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976128 | Schilling et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006755 | Edwards | Dec 1999 | A |
6009877 | Edwards | Jan 2000 | A |
6023638 | Swanson | Feb 2000 | A |
6024740 | Lesh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036687 | Laufer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039731 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080149 | Huang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091995 | Ingle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099524 | Lipson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113592 | Taylor | Sep 2000 | A |
6117101 | Diederich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123702 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135999 | Fanton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142993 | Whayne et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183466 | Wong et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197021 | Panescu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210403 | Klicek | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212426 | Swanson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217573 | Webster | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219577 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224592 | Eggers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238387 | Miller, III | May 2001 | B1 |
6245065 | Swanson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273886 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283951 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292695 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293941 | Strul et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314325 | Fitz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322556 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322558 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358246 | Behl et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423057 | He et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428537 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451015 | Rittman, III et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464696 | Oyama et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488678 | Sherman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6488679 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494880 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500172 | Panescu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506189 | Rittman, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508815 | Strul et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511476 | Hareyama | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514248 | Eggers et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517811 | John et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542781 | Koblish et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558378 | Sherman et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6558382 | Jahns et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562034 | Edwards et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635054 | Fjield et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635057 | Harano et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640120 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648883 | Francischelli et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666862 | Jain et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669655 | Acker et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679269 | Swanson | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682527 | Strul | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685700 | Behl et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711444 | Koblish | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730079 | Lovewell | May 2004 | B2 |
6733498 | Paton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736835 | Pellegrino et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6752804 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752805 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761716 | Kadhiresan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6796981 | Wham et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849073 | Hoey et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850801 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855141 | Lovewell | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855142 | Harano et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869431 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885888 | Rezai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893436 | Woodard et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6936047 | Nasab et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939346 | Kannenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955675 | Jain | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962587 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989010 | Francischelli et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001379 | Behl et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001381 | Harano et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004911 | Tu et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008417 | Eick | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025764 | Paton et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029470 | Francischelli et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066933 | Hagg | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076399 | Godara | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7104985 | Martinelli | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108694 | Miura et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118568 | Hassett et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131445 | Amoah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137980 | Buysse et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149574 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169144 | Hoey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7221979 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226447 | Uchida et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247155 | Hoey et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250048 | Francischelli et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251531 | Mosher et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258688 | Shah et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7364578 | Francischelli et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367972 | Francischelli et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381200 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390894 | Weinshilboum et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412285 | Schroeppel et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429261 | Kunis et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7533002 | Godara | May 2009 | B2 |
7582084 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596469 | Godara | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617005 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620451 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651492 | Wham | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7717909 | Strul et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717948 | Demarais et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7778703 | Gross et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792589 | Levy et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799020 | Shores et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824399 | Francischelli et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837679 | Biggs et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842076 | Zikorus et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846160 | Payne et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850685 | Kunis et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887534 | Hamel et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901400 | Wham et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922714 | Stevens-Wright | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927328 | Orszulak et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7959626 | Hong et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963962 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972328 | Wham et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7976540 | Daw et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007495 | Mcdaniel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048070 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058771 | Giordano et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8080008 | Wham et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086315 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095212 | Sato | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105323 | Buysse et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8131371 | Demarals et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131372 | Levin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140170 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145317 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147485 | Wham et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150518 | Levin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150519 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150520 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152801 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152802 | Podhajsky et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162932 | Podhajsky et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175711 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241275 | Hong et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8273084 | Kunis et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8340763 | Levin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8876813 | Min et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909316 | Ng | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9028472 | Mathur et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037259 | Mathur | May 2015 | B2 |
9155589 | Jenson | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9561070 | Brotz et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20010014802 | Tu | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020058933 | Christopherson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062123 | McClurken et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087208 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091381 | Edwards | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091385 | Paton et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107515 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139379 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143302 | Hinchliffe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165532 | Hill et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004510 | Wham et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050635 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050681 | Pianca et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060858 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065322 | Panescu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074039 | Puskas | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125790 | Fastovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144665 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181897 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195507 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199863 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229340 | Sherry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059328 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068304 | Paton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082859 | Schaer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122420 | Amoah | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167509 | Taimisto | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040215186 | Cornelius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050021020 | Blaha | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080409 | Young et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090815 | Francischelli et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096647 | Steinke et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124977 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187579 | Danek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228460 | Levin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050283148 | Janssen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288662 | Uchida et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288730 | Deem et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025765 | Landman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058711 | Harhen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085054 | Zikorus et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095029 | Young et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095032 | Jackson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100618 | Chan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106375 | Werneth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142753 | Francischelli et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161148 | Behnke | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206150 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212075 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217707 | Daniel | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060271111 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282071 | Utley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010860 | Gafni et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016274 | Boveja et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049999 | Esch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050001 | Luttich | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083195 | Werneth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112342 | Pearson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135875 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167943 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173805 | Weinberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203481 | Gregg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208333 | Uchida et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265687 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270688 | Gelbart et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270795 | Francischelli et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015562 | Hong et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080071257 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077126 | Rashidi | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101356 | Babbar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125775 | Morris | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147057 | Eisele | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188912 | Stone et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188913 | Stone et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228181 | Godara et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255642 | Zarins et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262489 | Steinke | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281312 | Werneth et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281322 | Werneth et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300589 | Paul et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319513 | Pu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030477 | Jarrard | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036948 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062873 | Wu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076409 | Wu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090182323 | Eder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182325 | Werneth et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090299365 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100137860 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137952 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179533 | Podhajsky | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179538 | Podhajsky | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191112 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211063 | Wham et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222851 | Deem et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222854 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228247 | Paul et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100324548 | Godara et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110077641 | Dunning | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087214 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087217 | Yates et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130755 | Bhushan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190755 | Mathur et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110270120 | McFarlin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110230876 | Hong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110270237 | Werneth et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270247 | Sherman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120041502 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120095461 | Herscher et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101538 | Ballakur et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130289 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130345 | Levin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136346 | Condie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136348 | Condie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143097 | Pike | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150169 | Zielinksi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172837 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197243 | Sherman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120310241 | Orszulak | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006228 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006235 | Podhajsky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130123778 | Richardson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165764 | Scheuermann et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172878 | Smith | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140128865 | Gross | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194866 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213873 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221805 | Wang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228614 | Stopek | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228829 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228858 | Stopek | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236137 | Tran et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236138 | Tran et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246465 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140249524 | Kocur | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257266 | Kasprzyk et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266235 | Mathur | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275924 | Min et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276124 | Cholette et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276733 | Vanscoy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276742 | Nabutovsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276746 | Nabutovsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276755 | Cao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276762 | Parsonage | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276766 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276767 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276773 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140316400 | Blix et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316496 | Masson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330266 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140336637 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150005764 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025524 | Nabutovsky | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150245867 | Gross | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160310201 | Brotz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170007157 | Gross et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007158 | Gross et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2007 019 566 | Oct 2013 | DE |
0879613 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1169976 | Jan 2002 | EP |
768841 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1366724 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2037840 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2460486 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2747691 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2797535 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2914192 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2867733 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2907703 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2965931 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2967702 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2967728 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2967729 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2991575 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3158961 | Apr 2017 | EP |
H08504531 | May 1996 | JP |
H1071037 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2011505929 | Mar 2011 | JP |
6122206 | Apr 2017 | JP |
WO1993008757 | May 1993 | WO |
WO-1994007446 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO1994010922 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-1995025472 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO-1995031142 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-1995031243 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO1996000036 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO1996039086 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO1997004702 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-1997018853 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-1997036548 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO1997040882 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-1998042403 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO1998042403 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-1999000060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO1999000060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-1999002096 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO1999060923 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO2000015130 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-2000056237 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-2007008954 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO2000122897 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-2001022897 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-2001070114 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-2003022167 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-2003082080 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2005030072 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005041748 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005051215 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110528 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006041881 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006041881 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006080982 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006105121 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2007008954 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007067941 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007078997 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008003058 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008049084 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008101356 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2010078175 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2011017168 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO2011126580 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2011144911 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2012024631 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO2012054762 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2013030743 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2013101485 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2014029355 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014059165 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014068577 | May 2014 | WO |
WO2014124241 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO2014149550 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014149552 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014149553 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014149690 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014150425 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014150432 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014150441 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014150455 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014158713 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2014163990 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2014179110 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO2014182946 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18171535.0, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,110, filed Aug. 29, 2012, Demarais et al. |
Bhandari, et al. “Loin Pain Hematuria Syndrome: Pain Control with RFA to the Spanchanic Piexus,” The Pain Clinc, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327. |
Search Report dated Jul. 23, 2009 for European Application No. 07799148.7. |
Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2013 for European Application No. 13159256. |
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765. |
Avitall, et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984. |
Beale et al., “Minimally Invasive Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Review of Encovenous Laser Treatment and Radiofrequency Ablation” Lower Extremity Wounds 3(4), 2004, 10 pages. |
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page. |
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831. |
Dodge, et al., “Lumen Diameter of Normal Human Coronary Arteries Influence of Age, Sex, Anatomic Variation, and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Dilation”, Circulation, 1992, vol. 86 (1), 232-246 pp. |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages). |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages). |
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002). |
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chrnoic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, 11 page. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198. |
Oppositin to European Patent No. 2465470, Granted Oct. 28, 2015, Date of Opposition Jul. 27, 2016, 34 pp. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1602370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages. |
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relieft, Time Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.com/time/printout/0.8816.2103278.00.html>. |
Papademetriou, Vasitios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages. |
Pieper et al., “Design and Implementation of a New Computerized System for Intraoperative Cardiac Mapping” Journal of Applied Physiology, 1991, vol. 71 (4), pp. 1529-1539. |
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complication Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005. |
Remo, et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation as Novel Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia Storm in Patients with Cardiomyopathy” Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(4), pp. 541-546. |
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003). |
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages. |
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867, filed Feb. 27, 2006, 70 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,589, filed Dec. 29, 2005, 62 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/852,787, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 112 pp. |
Ureter, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ureter, Jun. 2016, 6 pp. |
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968. |
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410. |
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct_2011.php>. |
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>. |
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension,” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010. 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europcr-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>. |
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life—Investor Relations. Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages. <https://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.xhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>. |
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media_relations/library/2011/2011/10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>. |
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-new/interventional-news--latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>. |
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages. |
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>. |
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n.l.), 4 pages. |
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million,” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics. Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages. <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>. |
“The Edison AwardsTM” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>. |
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages. |
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages. |
Asbell, Penny, “Conduction Keratoplasty For The Correction of Hyperopia,” Tr Am Opth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages. |
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibion elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages. |
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Ortholopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages. |
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997). |
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages. |
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on a renal denervation the Global Symplicity registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/serviet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=83002>. |
Curist, J.J., et al., “Surgical therapy for persistent hypertension after renal transplation.” Transplantation, 1981, 31: 125-128. |
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages. |
Dibona, G.F. “Sympathetic nervous system and kidney in hypertension.” Nephrol and Hypertension, 11: 197-200 (2002). |
Dibona, G.F., et al. “Neural control of renal function.” Physiol Rev. 77:75-197 (1997). |
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998). |
Final Office Action: U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; dated Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages. |
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertensions,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, filed Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages. |
Gertner, Jon, “Meet The Tech Duo That's Revitalizing The Medical Device Industry.” Fast Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 AM, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>. |
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997). |
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol, 174: 1592-1594 (2000). |
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery embolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001). |
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994). |
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages. |
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Huang et al., “Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats.” Hypertension 32 (1998) pp. 249-254. |
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honour for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>. |
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>. |
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531, 2:527-534 (2001). |
Lee, S.J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J. 40:545-549 (1999). |
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages. |
Lustgarten, D.L. ,et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999). |
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistent Hypertension.”Circulation, 2013, 25 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix, et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages. |
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com/ (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page. |
Medtronic, Inc. Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages. |
Millard, F. C. et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-732, (1989). |
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:ll-17-ll-21 (1992). |
Ong. K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006). |
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShotTM renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013. 4 pages. |
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal dnervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trfal.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013. 5 pages. |
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012. Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Dally, Oct. 26, 2012. 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/serviet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=80880>. |
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68. |
Renal Denervation (RDN). Symplicity RDM System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rnd/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf. |
Schauerte, P., et al. “Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Autonomic Nerves for Prevention of Vagal Atrial Fibrillation,” Circulation, 102:2774-2780 (2000). |
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages. |
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH postion paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Sievert Horst, “Novelty Award EurPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages. |
Smithwick et al., “Splanchnicentomy for essential hypertension.” J. Am. Med. Assn. 152:16 (1953), pp. 1501-1504. |
Solis-Herruzo et al. “Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome,” J. Hepatol. 5 (1987), pp. 167-173. |
Stella, A., et ai., “Effects of reversable renal denervation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4: 181-188 (1986). |
Stouffer, G. A. et al., “Catheter-based renal denervation in the treatment of resistant hypertension.” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages. |
Swartz. J.F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87:487-499 (1993). |
Uchida, F., et al; “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998). |
Valente, J.F. “Laparoscopic renal denervation for intractable ADPKD-related pain.” Nephrol Dial Transplant, 16. 160 (2001). |
Verloop, W.L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Hearth J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gove/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>. |
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium retention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996). |
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages. |
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Heaiio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages. |
Miller, Reed, “Finding A Future For Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials,” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence; Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014. 4 pages. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN | First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt Is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214. |
Wilcox, Josiah Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012. Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a muti-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages. |
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,253 U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,371, filed Sep. 13, 2012. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,255 U.S. Pat. No. 7,617,005 filed Sep. 13, 2012. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,292 U.S. Pat. No. 8,175,711 filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,335 U.S. Pat. No. 8,150,520, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,356 U.S. Pat. No. 8,150,519, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Demarais et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,327 U.S. Pat. No. 8,145,317 filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Levin, et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,209 U.S. Pat. No. 8,150,518 filed Sep. 13, 2012. |
Levin, et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,233 U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,372, filed Sep. 13, 2012. |
Levin, et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,243 U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,303 filed Sep. 13, 2012. |
Levin, et al., Reexamination Application No. 95/002,336 U.S. Pat. No. 7,647,115 filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
European Search report dated Jul. 23, 2009; Application No. 09156661.2; Application: Ardian, Inc; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated May 22, 2012; Application No. 11191392.7; Applicant: Medtronic Ardain Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 8 pages. |
European Search Report dated May 22, 2012; Application No. 11191394.3; Applicant: Medtronic Ardain Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated May 6, 2013; Application No. 10159584.1; Applicant: Medtronic Ardain Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2008; International Application No. PCT/US2007/072396; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/816,999, filed Jun. 28, 2006, 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/880,340, filed Jan. 12, 2007, 36 pages. |
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 56, Jul. 1975, pp. 208-281. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation on Proximal Water and Sodium Reabsorption,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, Apr. 1976, pp. 1104-1107. |
Curtis, John J. et al., “Surgical Therapy for Persistent Hypertension After Renal Transplantation” Transplantation, 31:125-128 (1981). |
Dibona, Gerald F. et al., “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, The American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197. |
Dibona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney—Past, Present and Future.” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture. Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624. |
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of Complete Renal Denervation and Selective Afferent Renal Denervation on the Hypertension induced by Intrarenal Norepinephrine Infusion in Conscious Rats”, Journal of Hypertension 1989, 7: 447-455. |
Katholi, Richard E., “Renal Nerves in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Experimental Animals and Humans,” Am J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983. the American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14. |
Krum, Henry et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension A Multicentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study,” Lancet 2009; 373:1275-81. |
Krum, et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension.” New England Journal of Med, Aug. 2009, 361; 9, 3 pages. |
Luippold, Gerd et al., “Chronic Renal Denervation Prevents Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetic Rats”, Nephrol Dial Transplant, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 342-347. |
Mahfoud et al “Treatment strategies for resistant arterial hypertension” Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:725-731. |
Osborn, et al., “Effect of Renal Nerve Stimulation on Renal Blood Flow Autoregulation and Antinatriuresis During Reductions in Renal Perfusion Pressure,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering From Nephritis,” Feb. 27, 1935;443-458. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension,” J. Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30. |
Rocha-Singh, “Catheter-Based Sympathetic Renal Denervation,” Endovascular Today, Aug. 2009, 4 pages. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implications for an Old Concept,” Hypertension, 2009; 54:1195-1201. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension,” N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): 932-934. |
Smithwick, R.H. et al., “Splanchnicectomy for Essential Hypertension,” Journal Am Med Assn, 1953; 152:1501-1504. |
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators: Krum H, Barman N, Schlaich M, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011;57(5):911-917. |
Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, “Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial). A Randomised Controlled Trial”; Lancet, Dec. 4, 2010, vol. 376, pp. 1903-1909. |
United States Renal Data Systems, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages. |
Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD-Related Pain”, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1 page. |
Wagner, C.D. et al., “Very Low Frequency Oscillations in Arterial Blood Pressure After Autonomic Blockade in Conscious Dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039. |
Examination Report from counterpart European Application No. 18171535.0, dated Jun. 30, 2021, 5 pp. |
Communication under Article 94(3) EPC in Application No. 18 171 535.0-1132; dated Jan. 19, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200360076 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60880340 | Jan 2007 | US | |
60816999 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15132424 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 16938404 | US | |
Parent | 12147191 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 15132424 | US | |
Parent | 12159306 | US | |
Child | 12147191 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11599723 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12159306 | US | |
Parent | 11504117 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 11599723 | US |