Complications of the mitral valve, which controls the flow of blood from the left atrium into the left ventricle of the human heart, have been known to cause fatal heart failure. In the developed world, one of the most common forms of valvular heart disease is mitral valve leak, also known as mitral regurgitation, which is characterized by the abnormal leaking of blood from the left ventricle through the mitral valve and back into the left atrium. This occurs most commonly due to ischemic heart disease when the leaflets of the mitral valve no longer meet or close properly after multiple infarctions, idiopathic and hypertensive cardiomyopathies where the left ventricle enlarges, and with leaflet and chordal abnormalities, such as those caused by a degenerative disease.
In addition to mitral regurgitation, rheumatic disease can lead to mitral narrowing or stenosis. While this has been virtually eliminated in developed countries, it is still common where the quality of living is not as high.
In the course of the last decade many companies have been successful in creating catheter or minimally invasive implantable aortic valves, but such implantation of a mitral valve is more difficult. Patients would be benefited by implanting a device by a minimally invasive surgical procedure employing a small incision or by a catheter implantation such as from the groin. From the patient's point of view, the catheter procedure is very attractive. Many patients who require mitral valve replacement are elderly and an open heart procedure is painful, risky and takes time for recovery. Some patients are not even candidates for such a surgery due to their advanced age and frailty.
Previous filings (for example, International PCT Publication No. WO 2013/114214, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein) have provided a disclosure on the use of an anchor to attach a mitral valve prosthesis in a patient via a catheter or minimally invasive procedure. The anchor most commonly described in these disclosures is a helical anchor which is first placed near the native mitral valve annulus and then the prosthetic valve is implanted inside the anchor. It would also be possible to add a helical anchor after the prosthetic valve was placed. The helical anchor can be placed to improve the stability of the prosthesis, to prevent rocking or even to control a leak that occurs around the valve. Whether the anchor is placed before or after the valve implant, this creates a two-step procedure for the interventionalist. He or she must first place the anchor, and then place the prosthetic valve, or vice versa.
It would be useful to have devices and methods to combine the anchor delivery with the valve delivery to simplify the procedure. A single surgical procedure can also reduce the impact on the patient.
Embodiments of the present invention include a delivery device and system for delivering a prosthetic mitral valve and an anchoring device, such as a helical anchoring device, and methods thereof. The prosthetic mitral valve and the helical anchoring device can be contained within a catheter that delivers both the prosthetic mitral valve and the helical anchoring device to a mitral position of a patient in a single procedure.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a mitral valve prosthesis includes an expandable valve frame and a plurality of arms each connected to the valve frame at or near a first end of the valve frame. A first arm from among the plurality of arms has a shape that is different from a shape of each of the other arms. The first arm is configured to guide a helical anchoring device around the valve frame.
According to another embodiment, a mitral valve prosthesis includes an expandable valve frame, a first arm having a first end attached to the valve frame and a second end configured to extend farther radially from a central axis of the valve frame than the valve frame extends from the central axis when the valve frame is in an expanded configuration, and an anchoring device including a coil that defines an inner space. The valve frame is held by the anchoring device when the valve frame is in the expanded configuration in the inner space of the coil.
According to another embodiment, a method for delivering a mitral valve prosthesis to a native mitral valve of a heart includes positioning a catheter at the native mitral valve, advancing an arm and a first end of a valve frame out of the catheter to a left ventricle of the heart, advancing an anchoring device out of the catheter into the left ventricle around leaflets and chordae tendineae of the native mitral valve, wherein the anchoring device is guided by at least a portion of the arm during the advancing of the anchoring device, and advancing remaining portions of the valve frame out of the catheter, wherein the valve frame is expanded and held in an inner space defined by a coil of the anchoring device.
Further features and advantages will become apparent from the description of embodiments using the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
Disclosed herein are prosthetic mitral heart valves and anchors for use with such valves that allow for a simplified and improved implantation. In various embodiments, a helical anchoring device is formed as a coiled or twisted anchor that includes one or more turns that twist or curve around a central axis. The prosthetic mitral valve is expanded and held within the coil. The anchor and the valve can be delivered in a single procedure. By combining anchor placement with valve implantation, the patient benefits from a faster and simpler prosthetic valve implantation process.
The prosthetic valve further includes a plurality of arms 43 that are attached to the valve and extend from the valve frame 48. The arms 43 can be attached to a distal end of the valve frame 48, so that the arms 43 begin exiting the catheter 10 prior to the valve frame 48 during delivery of the prosthetic valve 4. Alternatively, the arms 43 can be attached higher up towards a center the valve frame 48, away from the distal end (e.g., as seen in
At least one of the arms 43 is arranged differently (e.g., having a different shape) than the other arms 43.
The helical anchor delivery catheter 11 is used to deploy and position the helical anchoring device 5. The helical anchor delivery catheter 11 can initially be threaded through or held in the loop 42 of the prosthetic valve 4 during delivery of the prosthetic valve 4 through the catheter 10. In this manner, the deployment of the arms 43 will naturally also bend and/or otherwise position the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 into or close to the desired position for delivery of the helical anchoring device 5. In other embodiments, the helical anchor delivery catheter can alternatively be guided to and through the loop 42 after the respective parts have been delivered from the catheter 10. In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 can have a preformed shape that facilitates the positioning of the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 once delivered from the delivery catheter 10. In some embodiments, the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 can be steerable through one of various means.
The catheter 10 contains or holds the prosthetic mitral valve 4 that can be implanted in the region of the patient's native mitral valve 3, as shown in
A number of arms 43 are useful to provide a lower plane of attachment of the prosthetic mitral valve 4 to the native mitral valve 3. The arms 43 can vary in length and in character and construction. It will be understood that more or less than two arms 43 can be used with this embodiment, even though only two arms are shown in
One of the arms 43 has the loop 42 at its far or distal end to direct or control a helical anchor delivery catheter 11 that contains the helical anchoring device 5. In this embodiment, the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 has been preloaded into the loop 42. The arm 43 including the loop 42 can be of heavier construction than the other arms 43 and does not have to resemble the other arm or arms 43 that do not include a loop 42.
The arms 43 have shape memory properties or are otherwise resilient, such that when they are deployed outwardly from the delivery catheter 10 they can revert back to their curved shapes and wrap around the native mitral leaflets 31.
The arm 43 with the loop 42 wraps around the native mitral leaflet 31 and the attached helical anchor delivery catheter 11 is carried with it so that the chordae tendineae 32 and the patient's mitral valve leaflets 31 sit inside (i.e., on a concave side of the curvature of) an exposed end of the helical anchoring device 5. When the helical anchoring device 5 is advanced from this location, it will encircle the chordae tendineae 32 so that the native mitral valve leaflets 31 and the chordae 32 will be trapped inside a circle created by the helical anchoring device 5, as will be seen later.
The loop 42 at the end of the arm 43 swings the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 around the leaflets 31 and above the chordae 32 into a preferred position under the native mitral valve annulus 34. This particular arm 43 can have a double function of attaching the prosthetic valve 4 to the leaflet margin and guiding delivery of the helical anchoring device 5. The loop 42 can be sufficiently large to allow the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 to pivot or swivel as the system is deployed.
The helical anchoring device 5 is preferably delivered in a plane close to parallel to the underside of the native mitral valve 3. The helical anchor delivery catheter 11 is also aimed or directed to this plane by the loop 42. In one embodiment, the loop 42 can include a short tube that forces the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 into a favorable plane and orientation. Or the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 can be steerable. Many steerable catheters are known and available in the field of art.
In further embodiments, devices other than the loop 42 can direct the delivery of the helical anchoring device 5. For example, a cell of a stent frame that composes part of the prosthetic mitral valve 4 can also perform the same function as the loop 42 shown here. A hook or a tube can also be used. Any structure that can direct the helical anchoring device 5 around the native leaflets 31 can be added to the prosthetic valve 4. The structure can be permanently fabricated in the prosthetic valve 4 or can be temporary. For example, a loop of suture could be used to create the loop 42. The suture could then be withdrawn. In other embodiments, prior mitral valve prosthetics having arms or wings can be modified or retrofitted with the loop 42 of the present prosthetic valve 4 in order to facilitate delivery of the helical anchoring device 5.
The arms 43 in
Deployment of the helical anchoring device 5 can be started anywhere around the mitral valve annulus 34. For example, deployment of the helical anchoring device 5 can start in or adjacent to the middle of a leaflet 31. This would be an advantage for an operator who, for example, would not have to precisely locate a commissure of the native mitral valve to begin the anchoring device delivery procedure, thereby simplifying the procedure.
The partially delivered prosthetic valve 4 can serve to center the delivery of the helical anchoring device 5. It can also provide a stable platform for delivery of the helical anchoring device 5.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In
In the embodiment of
The use of a helical anchoring device that can optionally be delivered at the same time as a prosthetic valve provides the interventionalist a considerable amount of choice. For example, some embodiments of the prosthetic valve 4 are able to be re-sheathed, i.e., re-inserted into the delivery catheter 10, allowing the prosthetic valve 4 to be partly advanced and tested for its fit during a procedure. If the operator is not happy with the positioning before the final release of the prosthetic valve 4, the prosthetic valve 4 can be pulled back into the delivery catheter 10.
In some methods of use, the prosthetic valve 4 can be positioned first without the helical anchoring device 5 in place. If the anchoring of the prosthetic valve 4 appears to be strong and stable and there is no evidence of movement or leak, the prosthetic valve 4 can be released without the helical anchoring device 5. On the other hand, if the operator is not satisfied with, for example, the position or stability of the prosthetic valve 4 in the mitral position without the helical anchoring device 5, the prosthetic valve 4 can be pulled back into the delivery catheter 10. Then, the helical anchoring device 5 can be placed first and the prosthetic valve 4 can be positioned and expanded therein. This would let the user decide the clinical need for the extra anchoring of the helical anchoring device 5 based on each individual procedure.
In
The turns of the helical anchoring device 5 also compress against the body of the prosthetic valve 4 to position, orient and prevent movement of the prosthetic valve 4. The helical anchoring device 5 provides a frictional attachment of the body of the prosthetic valve 4 to the native mitral valve leaflets 31 and serves to anchor the arms 43 that wrap around the helical anchoring device 5.
The upper atrial portion 46 of the prosthetic mitral valve 4 is shown with a wide area that sits inside the left atrium 24 to promote attachment to or abutment against the wall of the left atrium 24. However the force or pressure that tends to urge the prosthetic mitral valve 4 from the left atrium 24 into the left ventricle 25 is low, and so the atrial portion 46 may not be necessary and could be eliminated or reduced in a clinical prosthesis according to some embodiments.
The turns of the helical anchoring device 5 aid in overcoming variations in the lengths of the patient's leaflets 31, variations in the length of the chordae tendineae 32 and variations in the attachment point of the chordae 32 in the left ventricle 25. When a prosthetic mitral valve with arms 43 wrapping around the leaflets 31 is used without any helix or anchor encircling under the leaflets 31, the depth or robustness of fixation of the prosthetic mitral valve can vary around the perimeter of the implanted prosthetic mitral valve. For example, if the chordae tendineae 32 attached to the middle part of the posterior leaflet 31 were very elongated or ruptured (a common situation), the arms 43 can fail to wrap around and engage the leaflet 31 at this location. Or there can be a very limited engagement between one of the arms 43 and the leaflet 31, causing the arm 43 to move to or come to rest at a much higher plane closer to the valve annulus 34. If any of these occurs, the part of the prosthetic valve where this happens would sit higher or closer to the native mitral valve 3, which may create a skew in the prosthetic valve so the prosthetic valve would sit at an angle to the plane of inflow of the valve. As the heart beats, there is a large load on the prosthetic valve and it can begin to rock and shift. The heart beats almost 100,000 times per day and after several days or weeks or months, the prosthetic valve may shift, move and dislodge. Also, if the leaflets 31 or chordae 32 were very elongated, there may be no contact with the arms, and an effective seal around the implant may not be formed. This could result in a large paravalvular leak due to lack of engagement of the prosthetic valve with the native mitral leaflets 31. The helical anchoring device 5 under the leaflets 31 can compress leaflet tissue against the prosthetic valve and prevent this problem. The helical anchoring device 5 can sit in one plane and prevent problems related to variations in patient anatomy.
In clinical practice, there are virtually limitless variations in the size of the leaflets 31, the character of the leaflets 31, the chordal lengths and the attachment of chordae 32 as well as the diameter of the mitral annulus 34. The use of the helical anchoring device 5 under the leaflets 31 neutralizes many of these variables since the fixation point of the arms 43 can be brought to the lowest turn of the helical anchoring device 5. This position can be determined in advance by selecting the number of turns of the helical anchoring device 5 and the thickness of the helical anchoring device 5 to match the turning point of the arms 43 at the lowest part of the prosthetic valve 4.
Thus, the helical anchoring device 5 can create a common and predefined plane for the anchoring of the arms 43 of the prosthetic mitral valve 4. In the situation described previously where some of the chordae 32 are stretched and where contact between the prosthetic valve 4 may otherwise be loose or less secure without the helical anchoring device 5, the attachment of the prosthetic mitral valve 4 in this region can be to the helical anchoring device 5 instead. This would create a common plane for the lowest point of the prosthetic mitral valve 4.
Therefore, more turns of the helical anchoring device 5 can be added to ensure the arms 43 of the prosthetic valve 4 are at a common lowest plane throughout its perimeter. In some embodiments, the helical anchoring device 5 can be made thicker. In some embodiments, waves or undulations can be added to the turns of the helical anchoring device 5 to expand the height of the helical anchoring device 5.
The helical anchoring device 5 thus improves stability of the prosthetic valve 4 by providing an anchor point for the arms 43 of the prosthetic valve 4 to wrap around and at the same time the helical anchoring device 5 can trap the perimeter of the barrel of the prosthetic valve 4 along its length. The combination of these features provides great stability to the prosthetic valve 4. It also seals the native mitral valve 3 against the prosthetic valve 4 to prevent a paravalvular leak.
In addition, patients' native mitral valves (i.e., leaflets 31, annulus 34, and chordae 32) come in all varieties and combinations. It is less practical for a manufacturer to make different lengths and depths of anchoring arms 31 and for the operator to deliver these products perfectly into position inside the patient. It can be more practical to adjust for these variations by placing the helical anchoring device 5 below the prosthetic valve 4 and using this helical anchoring device 5 to create a lowest plane for the arms 43 to anchor against.
In the embodiments described above, the helical anchor delivery catheter 11 that delivers the helical anchoring device 5 under the native mitral leaflets 31 is separate from the prosthetic device 4. In the embodiment illustrated in
In the embodiment shown in
In
Various other modifications or alternative configurations can be made to the prosthetic valves, helical anchors, and/or deployment systems according to the above described embodiments of the invention. For example, any variation of the valve prosthesis where controlled deployment of a helical anchor can be facilitated by a portion of the prosthesis that interacts with either the helical anchor itself or with a catheter for delivering the helical anchor may be alternatively arranged. The interacting feature may be embodied in an arm of the valve prosthesis as described in some of the above embodiments, or may be a feature that is arranged on another portion of the valve prosthesis. With respect to the helical anchor, the number of coils can be further varied, based on for example, properties of the native mitral valve and/or desired positioning of the valve prosthesis. Various other coil shapes, lengths, and arrangements and modifications can also be made based on a wide range of considerations.
For purposes of this description, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of the embodiments of this disclosure are described herein. The disclosed methods, apparatus, and systems should not be construed as being limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and nonobvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The methods, apparatus, and systems are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combination thereof, nor do the disclosed embodiments require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed embodiments are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth below. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed methods can be used in conjunction with other methods. Additionally, the description sometimes uses terms like “provide” or “achieve” to describe the disclosed methods. These terms are high-level abstractions of the actual operations that are performed. The actual operations that correspond to these terms may vary depending on the particular implementation and are readily discernible by one of ordinary skill in the art.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosure may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure. Rather, the scope of the disclosure is defined by the following claims.
The present disclosure claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/943,125, filed Feb. 21, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3564617 | Sauvage et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4490859 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4512338 | Balko et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
5282847 | Trescony et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5403305 | Sauter et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558644 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607464 | Trescony et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6120534 | Ruiz | Sep 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235042 | Katzman | May 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6406492 | Lytle | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409758 | Stobie et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6419696 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6527979 | Constantz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6625578 | Spaur et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6730121 | Ortiz et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6767362 | Schreck | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797002 | Spence et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878162 | Bales et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6971998 | Rosenman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018408 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7077861 | Spence | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101395 | Tremulis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125421 | Tremulis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166126 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166127 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7276084 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318278 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7431726 | Spence et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445632 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527646 | Randert et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618449 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655034 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7737060 | Strickler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758639 | Mathis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780726 | Seguin | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785366 | Maurer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7942927 | Kaye et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955385 | Crittenden | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959672 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016882 | Macoviak et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029556 | Rowe | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052750 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092520 | Quadri | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8128691 | Keranen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8167932 | Bourang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8236049 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8323335 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8398708 | Meiri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449606 | Eliasen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8652203 | Quadri et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663322 | Keranen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8795352 | O'Beirne et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8986373 | Chau et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9078747 | Conklin | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095434 | Rowe | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9622863 | Karapetian et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20020026094 | Roth | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045936 | Moe | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020138135 | Duerig et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173841 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100939 | Yodfat et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030158597 | Quiachon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167089 | Lane | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225420 | Wardle | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040167620 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186563 | Lobbi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096736 | Osse et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137691 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203614 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203617 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058872 | Salahieh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195185 | Lane et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010876 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010877 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070185572 | Solem et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203503 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203575 | Forster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232898 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244553 | Rafiee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265700 | Eliasen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004697 | Lichtenstein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033542 | Antonsson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080114442 | Mitchell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125853 | Bailey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080208330 | Keranen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228265 | Spence et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243245 | Thambar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275503 | Spence et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005863 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090157175 | Benichou | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177278 | Spence | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234318 | Loulmet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259307 | Gross et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276038 | Tremulis et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276040 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281619 | Le et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299471 | Keranen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319037 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049313 | Alon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076549 | Keidar et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145440 | Keranen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152839 | Shandas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161047 | Cabiri | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168844 | Toomes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198347 | Zakay et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217382 | Chau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217385 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100312333 | Navia | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318183 | Keranen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331971 | Keranen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331973 | Keranen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015729 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110098802 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106247 | Miller et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137397 | Chau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178597 | Navia et al. | Jul 2011 | A9 |
20110196480 | Cartledge | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208297 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208298 | Tuval et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218621 | Antonsson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224785 | Hacohen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245911 | Quill et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288634 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295361 | Claiborne, III et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319989 | Lane et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319990 | Macoviak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016464 | Seguin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120053680 | Bolling et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150287 | Forster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120259409 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310328 | Olson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316643 | Keranen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006352 | Yaron | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023985 | Khairkhahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130114214 | Takeguchi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130190857 | Mitra et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130274873 | Delaloye et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304200 | McLean | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310917 | Richter et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310928 | Morriss et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317598 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331929 | Mitra et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074299 | Endou et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140194981 | Menk et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200661 | Pintor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236287 | Clague et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277417 | Schraut et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277419 | Garde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277424 | Oslund | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140330372 | Weston et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140343671 | Yohanan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350667 | Braido et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140379074 | Spence et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150073545 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150073546 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150282931 | Brunnett et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1684644 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1714766 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101588771 | Nov 2009 | CN |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19546692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
199907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0103546 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0592410 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0597967 | May 1994 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0850609 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1796597 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1827314 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2072027 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2788217 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2815844 | May 2002 | FR |
1271508 | Nov 1986 | SU |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
1991017720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9940964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0162189 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0164137 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0203892 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0222054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
05034812 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005084595 | Sep 2005 | WO |
05102015 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005102015 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006091163 | Aug 2006 | WO |
06111391 | Oct 2006 | WO |
06138173 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007047488 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007067942 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007097983 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008005405 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008015257 | Feb 2008 | WO |
08058940 | May 2008 | WO |
2008058940 | May 2008 | WO |
2008091515 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009033469 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009134701 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010057262 | May 2010 | WO |
2010121076 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2013068542 | May 2013 | WO |
2013110722 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013114214 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2015023862 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bonhoeffer et at., “Percutaneous Replacement of Pulmonary valve in a Right-Ventricle to Pulmonary-Artery Prosthetic Conduit with Valve Dysfunction,” Early Report, The Lancet, vol. 356, Oct. 21, 2000. |
Casselman et al., “Reducing Operative Morality in Valvular Reoperations: The “valve in ring” Procedure,” Brief Technique Reports, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 141, No. 5. May 2011. |
Cheung et al, Live Case Transmissions, NYHA III CHF, Case Summary, Sep. 23, 2010, St. Paul's Hospital/University of British Columbia. |
Cheung et al,“Transapical Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation in a Human,” The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 2009. |
Descoutures et al., “Transcatheter Valve-in-Ring Implantation After Failure of Surgical Mitral Repair,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 44, e8-e15, 2013. |
Himbert et al., “Transseptal Implantation of a Transcatheter Heart Valve in a Mitral Annuloplasty Ring to Treat Mitral Repair Failure,” Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, American Heart Association, 2011. |
Himbert, Dominique, “Transvenous Mitral Valve Repair Replacement After Failure of Surgical Ring Annuloplasty,” Research Correspondence, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012. |
International Search Report from corresponding PCT case No. PCT/IB2015/000901 dated Feb. 15, 2015. |
Kempfert et al., “Minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-ring implantation: the atrial transcatheter approach for re-operative mitral valve replacement after failed repair,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2009, 35:965-969. |
Ma et al., “Double-Crowned Valved Stents for Off-Pump Mitral Valve Replacement,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 28, 194-199, 2005. |
Shuto et al., “Percutaneous Transvenous Melody Valve-in-Ring Procedure for Mitral Valve Replacement,” J Am Coll Cardiol, 58(24): 2475-2480, 2011. |
Walther et al., “Human Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Valve-in-a-Valve Implantation,” Case Reports, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 2008. |
Walther et al., “Valve-in-a-Valve Concept for Transcatheter Minimally Invasive Repeat Xenograph Implantation,” Preclinical Studies, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007. |
Webb et al., “Mitral Valve in Valve,” TCT Sep. 2009, Live Case: 30 Minutes, St. Paul's Hospital/University of British Columbia. |
Webb et al., “Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprosthetic Heart Valves,” Journal of the American Heart Association, 11, Apr. 27, 2010. |
Weger et al., “First-in-Man Implantation of a Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve in a Mitral Annuloplasty Ring: Novel Treatment Modality for Failed Mitral Valve Repair,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 39, 1054-1056, 2011. |
Wenaweser et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Regurgitation in Degenerated Bioprosthesis: The First Valve Procedure Using Corevalve Revalving System,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 70:760-764, 2007. |
Al-Khaja, et al. “Eleven Years' Experience with Carpentier-Edwards Biological Valves in Relation to Survival and Complications,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, vol. 3, pp. 305-311. 1989. |
Andersen, H.R. “History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis,” Herz No. 34. pp. 343-346. 2009. |
Andersen, H.R., et al. “Transluminal Implantation of Artificial Heart Valve. Description of a New Expandable Aortic Valve and Initial Results with implantation by Catheter Technique in Closed Chest Pig,” European Heart Journal, No. 13. pp. 704-708. 1992. |
Bailey, S. “Percutaneous Expandable Prosthetic Valves,” Textbook of Interventional Cardiology vol. 2, 2nd Ed. pp. 1268-1276. 1994. |
Pavcnik, et al. “Development and initial Experimental Evaluation of a Prosthetic Aortic Valve for Transcatheter Placement,” Cardiovascular Radiology, vol. 183, No. 1. pp. 151-154. 1992. |
Ross, “Aortic Valve Surgery,” At a meeting of the Council on Aug. 4, 1966. pp. 192-197. |
Sabbah, et al. “Mechanical Factors in the Degeneration of Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves: An Overview,” Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 302-309. 1989. |
Uchida, “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 150. pp. 1185-1187. 1986. |
Wheatley, “Valve Prostheses,” Operative Surgery, 4th ed. pp. 415-424. 1986. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238313 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61943125 | Feb 2014 | US |