The invention generally relates to devices, systems, and methods for performing endoscopic surgical procedures.
Endoscopic surgery (also called keyhole surgery) encompasses modern, minimally invasive surgical procedures, in which access to the surgical field is gained through relatively small incisions. Endoscopic surgery includes laparoscopic procedures, which are performed within the abdominal or pelvic cavities. Endoscopic surgery also includes thoracoscopic procedures, which are performed on the thoracic or chest cavity.
Minimally invasive surgical procedures are desirable because they make possible reduced blood loss; reduced post-operative patient discomfort; shortened recovery and hospitalization time; and reduced exposure of internal organs to possible contaminants.
In laparoscopic surgery, for example, operations in the abdomen are performed through relatively small incisions (usually 0.5-1.5 cm).
During laparoscopic surgery, the abdomen is inflated using CO2 gas provided by an insufflation circuit. The CO2 elevates the abdominal wall above the internal organs like a dome to create a working and viewing space for the surgery.
One key element in laparoscopic surgery is an assembly called a laparoscopic trocar (which, in short hand, will be called an “LT”). A conventional LT 10 is shown in
A conventional LT 10 consists of two parts (see
The cannula 12 is a tubular sleeve that defines an access path or lumen to the operating field. The cannula typically includes a self-contained “air-lock” mechanism within the lumen, which provides access for surgical instruments and optics through the cannula, while preventing the escape of CO2 introduced into the abdominal cavity, so the cavity stays inflated.
According to existing laparoscopic surgical preference and practice, conventional laparoscopic surgical instruments and laparoscopes are typically sized and configured in one of three standard exterior diameters, the smallest being about 5 mm, the next larger being about 10 mm, and the largest being about 12 mm. Due to inventory and cost issues, the conventional LT's incorporate cannulas 12 accordingly sized in a range of standard interior diameters to accommodate the smooth and airtight passage of the conventional 5 mm, or 10 mm, or 12 mm instruments. This hierarchy of cannula sizes for conventional LT's imposes limitation upon the use of specialized instruments having desirable added functional benefits, but which increase the exterior diameter of the instrument.
The obturator 14 is an elongated pointed cylinder with a sharpened, tissue-penetrating tip. The obturator 14 is sized and configured to fit within the lumen of a conventionally-sized cannula 12, with the penetrating tip 16 protruding from the open end of the cannula lumen, as
In conventional usage, the LT 10 is supplied as an assembled unit, as shown in
Since conventional LT's are typically treated as single use items, after each obturator 14 is withdrawn from its companion cannula 12 as just described, the obturator 14 is not used again during the procedure. It is discarded as medical waste. Theoretically, an obturator 14 (and companion cannula 12) could, if desired, be reprocessed for use in a subsequent procedure, but, according to conventional wisdom, many surgeons and surgical teams nevertheless resist reusing devices intended for single use that, even though reprocessed, have been inside a previous patient.
Typically, during a single laparoscopic procedure, several, separate LT's (each comprising a cannula 12 and its own dedicated obturator 14) are inserted (see
One aspect of the invention provides a simplified system and method for performing an endoscopic surgical procedure. The system and method are particularly well suited for use, e.g., in a situation in which it is desirable to make use of a specialized endoscopic instrument, which provides one or more desirable functional benefits, but which possesses a marginally increased exterior diameter that does not readily fit the cannula sizes used by conventional LT's.
The system and method include a single or a plurality of individual endoscopic cannula units to provide an array of access sites for minimally invasive endoscopic access to and/or visualization of a targeted internal operating field. There is no functional obturator preassembled to any cannula unit to aid insertion of the cannula unit into tissue. Each cannula unit is supplied obturator-free. Each cannula unit is sized and configured to accommodate passage of a conventional trocar assembly.
For installing every cannula unit, the system and method include a single trocar assembly sized to pass through the cannula unit. The trocar assembly includes a preassembled single endoscopic cannula and a single dedicated functional obturator. The system and method make possible the repeated use of the single trocar assembly to aid insertion of multiple cannula units into tissue, establishing an array of multiple endoscopic access sites using a single trocar assembly as the only obturator. The system and method make possible significantly less environmental damage due to medical waste, as well as contribute to lowered health care costs.
Another aspect of the invention provides another simplified system and method for performing an endoscopic surgical procedure. The system and method are directed head-on to the solution of the problem of excess medical waste and unnecessary medical equipment costs associated with conventional endoscopic procedures. The system and method provide single use cannula units sized and configured to accommodate a conventional endoscopic instrument (e.g., 5 mm, or 10 mm, or 12 mm); however, none of the cannula units is mated or made available with its own obturator. The cannula units are each provided obturator-free and are installed in multiple arrays using but a single conventional functional obturator. The single functional obturator is itself supplied as part of a preassembled conventional LT of the same size, which can be provided as a kit along with one or more cannula units or separately from another source. The system and method make it possible to establish an array of multiple endoscopic access sites (comprising the cannula units and the cannula of the LT) using only a single functional obturator.
The systems and methods described provide, for the first time, a plurality of stand-alone, single use endoscopic cannula units, free of their own dedicated obturators, that can be installed either by use of a preassembled single trocar preassembly or by use of a single functional obturator during a given surgical procedure. The result is, for a given endoscopic procedure entailing the installation of several cannula access units, the need for only one functional obturator. Cost savings and less environmental damage result.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention, which may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
I. Multiple Endoscopic Access Systems and Methods Employing a Single Obturator
A. First Representative Embodiment (An Overview)
More particularly, the system 20 includes a plurality of individual endoscopic cannula units 22 as will be described in greater detail later. The cannula units 22 provide an array of access sites for minimally invasive endoscopic access to and/or visualization of a targeted internal operating field. As shown in
The system 20 also include a single trocar assembly 24. The trocar assembly 24 includes a single endoscopic cannula 26, which provides one additional site for endoscopic access to the operating field. The trocar assembly 24 also includes, for the cannula 26, a single dedicated functional obturator 28 to aid insertion of the trocar assembly 24 as a unit into tissue. The single dedicated functional obturator 28 of the trocar assembly is the only functional obturator the system 20 provides.
As will be described in greater detail later, each endoscopic cannula unit 22 of the system is sized and configured to be marginally larger in internal diameter than the largest external diameter of the single trocar assembly 24. This makes possible the repeated use of the single trocar assembly 24 to aid insertion of all cannula units 22 into tissue. The system 20 makes possible a method for establishing an array of multiple endoscopic access sites using a single trocar assembly 24 as the only obturator, resulting in significantly less environmental damage due to medical waste, as well as contributing to lowered health care costs.
1. The Single Trocar Assembly
The single endoscopic trocar assembly 24 comprises a single endoscopic cannula 26 and a single, dedicated functional obturator 28, as shown in
The endoscopic cannula 26 can be conventionally sized to accommodate, upon removal of the dedicated obturator 28, conventional endoscopic tools and the attachment of an insufflations line. Both components of the single endoscopic trocar assembly 24 are intended to be used once during a given procedure, and thereafter discarded or, if desired, reprocessed.
By “functional obturator,” it is meant that obturator 28 includes a pointed or conical, tissue piercing tip 30, which is sized and configured, during passage in tissue, to incise or separate tissue. By “trocar assembly” with a “dedicated functional obturator,” it is meant that the single functional obturator 28 is supplied pre-assembled with the single endoscopic cannula 26, such that the pointed or conical, tissue piercing tip 30 of the obturator 28 is oriented to aid the insertion of the endoscopic trocar assembly 24 as a unit into tissue.
In the illustrated embodiment, the single functional obturator 28 is pre-assembled in a sliding fit within a lumen of the single endoscopic cannula 26 (see
The trocar assembly 24 can be a conventional, off-the-shelf LT, having a cannula diameter that is common in the practice of endoscopic procedures, e.g., 5 mm; 10 mm; or 12 mm.
2. The Cannula Units
The endoscopic cannula units 22 are each individually sized and configured to provide a site of minimally invasive, endoscopic access to a targeted internal operating field, e.g., within an abdomen.
By “cannula unit,” it is meant that a given cannula unit 22 is not supplied with its own dedicated functional obturator. That is, the system provides the ability to create multiple endoscopic access sites (i.e., using the multiple cannula units 22 and the single trocar assembly 24), but provides for use of only a single functional obturator. The single functional obturator for the multiple cannula units 22 is the endoscopic trocar assembly 24 itself.
As
As
Thus, each endoscopic cannula unit 22 can be individually fitted for insertion, one at a time, concentrically over the entire pre-assembled endoscopic trocar assembly 24, with the dedicated functional obturator 28 of the trocar assembly 24 protruding beyond both the endoscopic cannula 26 of the trocar assembly 24 and the separate cannula unit 22. That is, a given cannula unit 22 can be fitted over the exterior cannula 26 of the trocar assembly 24, to which the dedicated functional obturator 28 is pre-assembled. The result is that the single trocar assembly 24 can itself be repeatedly reused during the span of a given procedure as the only functional obturator to install multiple cannula units 22.
In a representative embodiment (see
In a representative embodiment (see
The gas seal assembly 36 can be variously sized and configured.
In a representative embodiment (see
In this arrangement, the gas seal assembly 36 is housed entirely within the cap 38 in-line with the working passage 40. In a representative embodiment, the gas seal assembly 36 desirably includes two cooperating functional seals 46 and 48. A first function seal 46 is positioned near the exit orifice 44. A second functional seal 48 is positioned near the entry orifice 42.
The first functional seal 46 is sized and configured to normally prevent gas loss when an instrument I is not inserted through the working passage 40, i.e., when the working lumen 32 of the cannula unit 22 is unoccupied (see
The second functional seal 48 is sized and configured to prevent gas loss as the first functional seal 48 yields to the insertion of an instrument I through the working passage 40 into the working lumen 32 of the cannula unit 22 (as shown in
As a result, there is no gas loss through the working lumen 32 of the cannula unit 22 as the cannula unit 22 serves its purpose of providing minimally invasive access to the insufflated operating cavity.
The size and configuration of the cooperating first and second functional seals 46 and 48 can vary.
In a representative embodiment, the first functional seal 46 comprises a flap valve component located adjacent the exit orifice 44 of the working passage 40 (see
As
As shown in
The diameter of flap valve component 46 is selectively sized and configured relative to the diameter of the exit orifice 44 to effectively cover and seal the exit orifice 44 in response to a typical range of insufflation pressures. In a representative embodiment, for an exit orifice 44 having a diameter of 0.4″, a flap valve component 46 having a diameter 0.5″ will affect a desired seal.
Further, the proximal region of the lumen of the cannula unit is desirably sized and configured to form a pressure directing chamber 50 immediately distal to the flap valve component 46. The pressure directing channel 50 accommodates and complements the fit and function of the flap valve component 46, as its condition is affected by insufflation pressures and the passage of instruments.
In a representative embodiment (see
The material type, thickness, and durometer of the flap valve component 46 can be further selected to optimize the fit and function of the flap valve component 46 in the presence of a range of typical insufflation pressures. In a representative embodiment, the flap valve component 46 is made, e.g., of a polyurethane material having a durometer of from 85 to 90 shore A. In this embodiment, the flap valve component 46 relies upon a combination of the focused application of insufflation pressure and the material properties of the flap valve component 46 itself to seal the exit orifice 44.
In this arrangement, the second functional seal 48 comprises an elastomeric septum located adjacent the entrance orifice 42 of the working passage 40. The elastomeric septum 48 is sized and configured to create a sliding seal along the instrument I as it passes through the entrance orifice.
In a representative embodiment (see
3. Representative Method of Use
The unique functional features of each cannula unit as described make possible a unique method of establishing an array of multiple endoscopic access sites using only a single functional obturator.
The method includes (see
The method further includes (see
The method further includes (see
As
By fitting the cannula unit 22 over the entire trocar assembly 24, a concentric access assembly 56 for the cannula unit 22 is created. The concentric access assembly 56 comprises, from interior to exterior, the dedicated functional obturator 28 of the trocar assembly 24, the endoscopic cannula 26 of the trocar assembly 24, and the selected cannula unit 22. The concentric access assembly 56 includes, protruding beyond the distal end of the cannula unit 22, the penetrating tip 30 of a functional obturator 28.
The method further includes (see
The method further includes, after body penetration and insufflation have been made (see
The method optionally includes, after (vi) (see
The method further includes, after insertion of all desired cannula units 22, the use of the trocar assembly 24 by itself in a traditional manner for form yet another access site. As shown in
Following (viii) (as
The system 20 and method make possible the use of a single functional obturator (i.e., the dedicated obturator 28 of the trocar assembly 24) for multiple endoscopic entries. The presence of the cannula unit 22 does not disturb either visualization during entry or significant enlarge the penetration site.
To the extent that several cannula units 22 are installed during a given procedure, only one trocar assembly 24 (comprising only one dedicated functional obturator 28) need be used for the multiple entries. Thus (as
B. Second Representative Embodiment (An Overview)
1. The Cannula Units
The system 58 (see
Except for its interior diameter, the cannula units 60 shown in
2. The Trocar Assembly
The system 58 may include a single trocar assembly 64 (see
3. Representative Method of Use
The unique functional features of each cannula unit as described make possible a unique method of establishing an array of multiple endoscopic access sites using only a single functional obturator.
The method includes (see
The method further includes (see
The method further includes, prior to insertion of any of the cannula units 60 (see
The method further includes, after insertion of the cannula 66 of the trocar assembly 64 (or conventional LT) (see
As
As
The method further includes, after body penetration of the cannula unit 60 has been made (see
The method optionally includes, after (vi) (see
Following (vi) (as
The system 58 and method make possible the use of a single functional obturator (i.e., the dedicated obturator 62 of the trocar assembly 64 or conventional LT) for multiple endoscopic entries. The presence of the cannula unit 60 does not disturb either visualization during entry or significant enlarge the penetration site.
To the extent that several cannula units 60 are installed during a given procedure, only one trocar assembly 64 or conventional LT (comprising only one dedicated functional obturator 62) need be used for the multiple entries. Thus (as
II. Creating Endoscopic Access for a Specialized View Optimizing Assembly
A. Overview
As shown in
As
As
The sheath 114 includes at its distal end a deflector assembly 164 (see
As
The surgical team may also depress the plunger of the syringe plunger 174 to dispense aliquots of 1 ml-5 ml of the flushing liquid 172 through the deflector assembly 164 (which conveyed through other lumens in the sheath) to flush debris off the end of the lens that may eventually accumulate.
The operator can, if desired, prompt a burst of CO2 gas from the insufflation circuit over the lens (by squeezing the pneumatic flush bulb 180 in the tubing set 116), to further remove debris and/or residual droplets of the flushing liquid from the lens. Visualization is restored rapidly and without removal of the laparoscope from the abdomen.
It is desirable to integrate the assembly 110 as much as possible with the existing suite of minimally invasive instrumentation, to not interfere with the surgical set-up, and to require minimal change in the process or practice of the surgical team.
As above explained, conventional laparoscopes, like other laparoscopic tools, typically come in three standard diameter sizes: 5 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. To meet the above-stated desirable objective, the sheath assembly 114 is desirably sized with an interior diameter to accommodate a selected one of these laparoscope diameters, as well as with an exterior diameter to accommodate passage through a conventional LT.
The sheath 114, when sized and configured to provide its desirable functional benefit for the smallest diameter conventional laparoscope (5 mm), possesses a marginally increased exterior diameter that falls between the cannula sizes used by conventional LT's. For example, the sheath 114 with an interior diameter sized for a 5 mm laparoscope has an exterior diameter which is larger than 5 mm, e.g., 7.5 to 8 mm. Although having an interior lumen sized for a conventional 5 mm instrument, the resulting 7-8 mm outer diameter of the sheath 14 is too large to fit a conventional 5 mm LT, and small enough to not require a conventional 10 mm LT.
This problem is effectively overcome by use of the system 20 shown in
The method makes use of a single 5 mm endoscopic trocar assembly 24 (see
The method selects a single one of the cannula units for inserting into tissue. The method fits the selected cannula unit 22 over the entire single trocar assembly 24 (
After body penetration and insufflation have been accomplished (see
The method optionally includes (see
After insertion of all desired cannula units 22, the trocar assembly 24 is itself inserted in a traditional manner, to form yet another access site (
As
The system 20 and method therefore make possible the use of a single functional obturator (i.e., the dedicated obturator 28 of the trocar assembly 24) for multiple endoscopic entries. The presence of the cannula unit 22 does not disturb either visualization during entry or significant enlarge the penetration site. Only one trocar assembly 24 (comprising only one dedicated functional obturator 28) need be used for the multiple entries. Thus (as
B. Continuous Flow Tubing (CFT)
A conventional insufflation circuit periodically cycles off, to stop the flow of CO2 gas to measure the pressure in the peritoneum. As shown in
As shown in
The directional valve 76 includes an interior ball that shifts side to side to block the flow paths. The ball is shifted by the pressure differential found between Paths 1 and 2.
The gas capacitor comprises an elastomeric reservoir 74 that expands to store approximately 50 cc of gas under pressure. The reservoir stores gas at 22 mmHg-24 mmHg. The diaphragm is made from a biocompatible elastomer like silicone. Durometer is less than 25 shore A.
The one-way valve 78 can comprise a high flow, low cracking pressure, ball check valve.
The connectors to the CFT 72 can comprise standard luer fittings.
The illustrative CFT 72 shown in
The concept of CFT 72 comprises the placement of an in-line reservoir (or air capacitor) in the circuit that supplies gas to the sheath 14. The reservoir collects gas during operation of the source insufflator and discharges gas for a brief periods while operation of the insufflator is periodically interrupted. There has never been a reason to provide a reservoir in an insufflations line, because no one has provided medical device that uses insufflation gas for anything but inflating the abdominal cavity.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/419,357 filed 3 Dec. 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3373736 | Fiore et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
D230727 | Richman | Mar 1974 | S |
4207874 | Choy | Jun 1980 | A |
4279246 | Chikama | Jul 1981 | A |
4281646 | Kinoshita | Aug 1981 | A |
D277408 | Kubokawa et al. | Jan 1985 | S |
D277505 | Kubokawa et al. | Feb 1985 | S |
4497550 | Ouchi et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4537209 | Sasa | Aug 1985 | A |
D280929 | Lystager | Oct 1985 | S |
4548197 | Kinoshita | Oct 1985 | A |
4552130 | Kinoshita | Nov 1985 | A |
D284028 | Seager | May 1986 | S |
4598698 | Siegmund | Jul 1986 | A |
4616169 | Proffitt | Oct 1986 | A |
4617013 | Betz | Oct 1986 | A |
4633855 | Baba | Jan 1987 | A |
4637814 | Leiboff | Jan 1987 | A |
4646722 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4735603 | Goodson et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741326 | Sidall et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748970 | Nakajima | Jun 1988 | A |
4760838 | Fukuda | Aug 1988 | A |
4773413 | Hussein et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4794911 | Okada | Jan 1989 | A |
4800869 | Nakajima | Jan 1989 | A |
4877016 | Kantor et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4941872 | Felix et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4973321 | Michelson | Nov 1990 | A |
4991565 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998527 | Meyer | Mar 1991 | A |
5009655 | Daignault, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019054 | Clement et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027791 | Takahashi | Jul 1991 | A |
5050585 | Takahashi | Sep 1991 | A |
5133336 | Savitt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5144942 | Decarie et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147292 | Kullas et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163927 | Woker et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167220 | Brown | Dec 1992 | A |
5201908 | Jones | Apr 1993 | A |
5207213 | Auhll et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225001 | Manni et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5279549 | Ranford | Jan 1994 | A |
D346023 | Stewart, Sr. | Apr 1994 | S |
5306272 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312400 | Bales et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313934 | Wiita et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320091 | Grossi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322070 | Goodman | Jun 1994 | A |
5328458 | Sekino et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336170 | Salerno et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339800 | Wiita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359991 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
5386817 | Jones | Feb 1995 | A |
5392766 | Masterson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400767 | Murdoch | Mar 1995 | A |
5448891 | Nakagiri et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448990 | De Faria Correa | Sep 1995 | A |
5464008 | Kim | Nov 1995 | A |
5468240 | Gentelia et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
D369862 | Stewart, Jr. | May 1996 | S |
5514074 | Yabe et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514084 | Fisher | May 1996 | A |
5518502 | Kaplan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5562600 | Matsuno | Oct 1996 | A |
5563737 | Kamrat | Oct 1996 | A |
5569157 | Nakazawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575753 | Yabe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575756 | Karasawa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5605532 | Schermerhorn | Feb 1997 | A |
5630795 | Kuramoto et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637075 | Kikawada | Jun 1997 | A |
5647840 | D'Amelio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5697888 | Kobayashi | Dec 1997 | A |
5746695 | Yasui et al. | May 1998 | A |
5788628 | Matsuno et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857961 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865730 | Fox et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868663 | Katsurada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869107 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894369 | Akiba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5922105 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954637 | Francis | Sep 1999 | A |
5957888 | Hinchliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5989183 | Reisdorf et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017333 | Bailey | Jan 2000 | A |
6040053 | Scholz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071606 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D428487 | Renner et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
6096026 | Schultz | Aug 2000 | A |
6110103 | Donofrio | Aug 2000 | A |
6110259 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126592 | Proch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149659 | Ahmed | Nov 2000 | A |
6156409 | Doushita et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176825 | Chin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206825 | Tsuyuki | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234635 | Seitzinger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6282442 | DeStefano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293909 | Chu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299592 | Zander | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306932 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354992 | Kato | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361492 | Santilli | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383134 | Santilli | May 2002 | B1 |
6409657 | Kawano | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425535 | Akiba | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447446 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6582357 | Ouchi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589316 | Schultz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D481126 | Hayamizu | Oct 2003 | S |
6645197 | Garrison et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
D484594 | Hayamizu | Dec 2003 | S |
D486910 | Hayamizu et al. | Feb 2004 | S |
6695772 | Bon et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699185 | Gminder et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712479 | Seitzinger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712757 | Becker et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712759 | Muller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752755 | Akiba | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755782 | Ogawa | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D493529 | Hayamizu et al. | Jul 2004 | S |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780516 | Chen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783845 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
D498846 | Hayamizu et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6814697 | Ouchi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6857436 | Labib et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858005 | Ohline et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882236 | Dinn et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889400 | Kawazoe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6921362 | Ouchi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921380 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6977053 | Mukasa et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984204 | Akiba | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989183 | McKillip | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7074180 | Bertolero et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080641 | Gomez | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087013 | Belson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7150713 | Shener et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
D534655 | Iranyi et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D535743 | Williams | Jan 2007 | S |
7169167 | Chu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7198599 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223231 | Akiba | May 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270670 | Yencho | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7341556 | Shalman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D573711 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | S |
7413543 | Banik et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
D600807 | Dienst et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D613403 | Poll et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7803109 | Gomez | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803144 | Vollrath | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7927271 | Dimitriou et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8047215 | Sasaki | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8062214 | Shener et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075481 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096944 | Harrel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8226549 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8419624 | James et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8517921 | Tremaglio et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545395 | Akahoshi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010011162 | Epstein | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020022762 | Beane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020058858 | Ogura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072652 | Berci et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091304 | Ogura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193806 | Moenning et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030200738 | Booth | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040034339 | Stoller et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059363 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082915 | Kadan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040204671 | Stubbs et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050043683 | Ravo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059981 | Poll | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065405 | Hasegawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080342 | Gilreath et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113797 | Ott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119528 | Weinberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137529 | Mantell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154355 | Gross et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159765 | Moutafis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171467 | Landman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171528 | Sartor et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203342 | Kucklick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234301 | Gomez | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261553 | Swain et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020165 | Adams | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041186 | Vancaillie | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047184 | Banik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052661 | Gannot et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069306 | Banik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060252993 | Freed et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270910 | Davis | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070088275 | Stearns | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070179432 | Bar Or | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182842 | Sonnenschein et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203474 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282253 | Sasaki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289449 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299310 | Phillips | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021277 | Stefanchik et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051631 | Dejima et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081948 | Weisenburgh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086704 | Aravamudan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108871 | Mohr | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161646 | Gomez | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188715 | Fujimoto | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200765 | Mondschein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208128 | Guo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249362 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255419 | Kendale et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319266 | Poll et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018602 | Mitelberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090113644 | Heck | May 2009 | A1 |
20090215018 | Edmondson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234193 | Weisenburgh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253962 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253965 | Miyamoto | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100168520 | Poll et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198014 | Poll et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100331856 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120022331 | Poll et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120101337 | Clark et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120165610 | Poll et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120184897 | Poll | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197084 | Drach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130317295 | Morse | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140114128 | Wills | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150374212 | Drach et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160089006 | Poll et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160174828 | Drach et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0664101 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0790652 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1188415 | Mar 2002 | EP |
59-203534 | Nov 1984 | JP |
61-168328 | Jul 1986 | JP |
05-103756 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-199979 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H07-275185 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09-135804 | May 1997 | JP |
2000-225093 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004-267583 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-110978 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2009-240596 | Oct 2009 | JP |
WO9210969 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO9222238 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO2005002210 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005009227 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005115221 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006014814 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2008030256 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2008077080 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008128142 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008130582 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009073577 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2010042913 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010042915 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2011041387 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011044448 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011130399 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012005819 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012044410 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012122263 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,644 entitled “Sheath for hand-held and robotic laparoscopes,” filed Jun. 18, 2014. |
Ott, Douglas E.; Chapter 1. Pneumoperitoneum: Production, management, effects and consequences; in Prevention & Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications, 1st Ed.; 6 pgs.; Jan. 1999 (retrieved from: http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/prevention—management/2006/02/chapter—1—pneum.html on Oct. 7, 2013). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,224 entitled “Manifold Coupling,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,225 entitled “Sheath Manifold for Maintaining Surgical Scope Visualization,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,221 entitled “Handle for Maintaining Surgical Scope Visualization,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/335,699 entitled “Surgical Scope Stabilizer,” filed Apr. 20, 2009 (now abandoned). |
Farley et al.; Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing lararoscopic cholecystectomy; Arch Surg; 139; pp. 739-744; Jul. 2004. |
Hashimoto et al.; Development of a fogless scope and its analysis using infrared radiation pyrometer; Surg Endosc; 11(8); pp. 805-808; Aug. 1997. |
Lawrentschuk et al.; Laparoscopic lens fogging: A review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field; Journal of Endourology; 24(6); pp. 905-913; Jun. 2010. |
Ohdaira et al.; Antifogging effects of a socket-type device with the superhydrophilic, titanium dioxide coated glass for laparoscope; Surg endosc; 21(2); pp. 333-338; Dec. 2007. |
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,501 entitled “Systems and methods for optimizing and maintaining visualization of a surgical field during the use of surgical scopes,” filed Sep. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US11/63277, dated Jul. 10, 2012. |
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,752 entitled “View optimizer and stabilizer for use with surgical scopes,” filed Jun. 8, 2015. |
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,672 entitled “Device for maintaining visualization with surgical scopes,” filed Jun. 8, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120310147 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61419357 | Dec 2010 | US |