The invention is directed to devices, systems, and methods for improving the function of a heart valve, e.g., in the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation.
I. The Anatomy of a Healthy Heart
The heart (see
The heart has four chambers, two on each side—the right and left atria, and the right and left ventricles.
The atria are the blood-receiving chambers, which pump blood into the ventricles. A wall composed of membranous and muscular parts, called the interatrial septum, separates the right and left atria. The ventricles are the blood-discharging chambers. A wall composed of membranous and muscular parts, called the interventricular septum, separates the right and left ventricles.
The synchronous pumping actions of the left and right sides of the heart constitute the cardiac cycle. The cycle begins with a period of ventricular relaxation, called ventricular diastole. The cycle ends with a period of ventricular contraction, called ventricular systole.
The heart has four valves (see
At the beginning of ventricular diastole (i.e., ventricular filling) (see
The opening and closing of heart valves occur primarily as a result of pressure differences. For example, the opening and closing of the mitral valve occurs as a result of the pressure differences between the left atrium and the left ventricle. During ventricular diastole, when ventricles are relaxed, the venous return of blood from the pulmonary veins into the left atrium causes the pressure in the atrium to exceed that in the ventricle. As a result, the mitral valve opens, allowing blood to enter the ventricle. As the ventricle contracts during ventricular systole, the intraventricular pressure rises above the pressure in the atrium and pushes the mitral valve shut.
The mitral valve consists of two leaflets, an anterior leaflet 110, and a posterior leaflet 115, attached to chordae tendineae 120 (or chords), which in turn are connected to papillary muscles 130 within the left atrium 140. Typically, the mitral valve has a D-shaped anterior leaflet 110 oriented toward the aortic valve, with a crescent shaped posterior leaflet 115. The leaflets intersect with the atrium 170 at the mitral annulus 190.
In a healthy heart, these muscles and their chords support the mitral and tricuspid valves, allowing the leaflets to resist the high pressure developed during contractions (pumping) of the left and right ventricles. In a healthy heart, the chords become taut, preventing the leaflets from being forced into the left or right atria and everted. Prolapse is a term used to describe the condition wherein the coaptation edges of each leaflet initially may coapt and close, but then the leaflets rise higher and the edges separate and the valve leaks. This is normally prevented by contraction of the papillary muscles and the normal length of the chords. Contraction of the papillary muscles is simultaneous with the contraction of the ventricle and serves to keep healthy valve leaflets tightly shut at peak contraction pressures exerted by the ventricle.
II. Characteristics and Causes of Mitral Valve Dysfunction
Valve malfunction can result from the chords becoming stretched, and in some cases tearing. When a chord tears, the result is a flailed leaflet. Also, a normally structured valve may not function properly because of an enlargement of the valve annulus pulling the leaflets apart. This condition is referred to as a dilation of the annulus and generally results from heart muscle failure. In addition, the valve may be defective at birth or because of an acquired disease, usually infectious or inflammatory.
As a result of regurgitation, “extra” blood back flows into the left atrium. During subsequent ventricular diastole (when the heart relaxes), this “extra” blood returns to the left ventricle, creating a volume overload, i.e., too much blood in the left ventricle. During subsequent ventricular systole (when the heart contracts), there is more blood in the ventricle than expected. This means that: (1) the heart must pump harder to move the extra blood; (2) too little blood may move from the heart to the rest of the body; and (3) over time, the left ventricle may begin to stretch and enlarge to accommodate the larger volume of blood, and the left ventricle may become weaker.
Although mild cases of mitral valve regurgitation result in few problems, more severe and chronic cases eventually weaken the heart and can result in heart failure. Mitral valve regurgitation can be an acute or chronic condition. It is sometimes called mitral insufficiency.
III. Prior Treatment Modalities
In the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation, diuretics and/or vasodilators can be used to help reduce the amount of blood flowing back into the left atrium. An intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation device is used if the condition is not stabilized with medications. For chronic or acute mitral valve regurgitation, surgery to repair or replace the mitral valve is often necessary.
To date, invasive, open heart surgical approaches have been used to repair or replace the mitral valve with either a mechanical valve or biological tissue (bioprosthetic) taken from pigs, cows, or horses.
The need remains for simple, cost-effective, and less invasive devices, systems, and methods for treating dysfunction of a heart valve, e.g., in the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation.
The invention provides devices, systems and methods that supplement, repair, or replace a native heart valve leaflet. The devices, systems, and methods include an implant that, in use, rests adjacent a valve annulus.
The implant defines a pseudo-annulus. The implant includes a neoleaflet element that occupies the space of at least a portion of one native valve leaflet. The implant allows the native leaflets to coexist with the implant, or if desired or indicated, one or more native leaflets can be removed and replaced by the implant. The neoleaflet element of the implant is shaped and compressed to mimic the one-way valve function of a native leaflet. The implant includes spaced-apart struts that are sized and configured to contact tissue near or within the heart valve annulus to brace the implant against migration within the annulus during the one-way valve function.
According to one aspect of the invention, the implant includes a scaffold, which defines a pseudo-annulus. The implant further includes at least two struts in generally oppositely spaced apart positions on the scaffold. The scaffold can be placed in an elastically loaded condition in a heart with the struts engaging tissue at or near the leaflet commissures of a heart valve annulus, to reshape the annulus for leaflet coaptation. The implant further provides a neoleaflet element coupled to the scaffold within pseudo-annulus, to provide a one-way valve function.
Other features and advantages of the invention shall be apparent based upon the accompanying description, drawings, and claims.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention, which may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
In its most basic form, the implant 400 is made—e.g., by machining, bending, shaping, joining, molding, or extrusion—from a biocompatible metallic or polymer material, or a metallic or polymer material that is suitably coated, impregnated, or otherwise treated with a material to impart biocompatibility, or a combination of such materials. The material is also desirably radio-opaque to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization.
As
The base 420 supports a bridge 430 that extends into the valve. The bridge 430 is sized and configured (see
As
Together, the bridge 430 and the spanning material 410 comprise a neoleaflet element 470 coupled to the base 420. The neoleaflet element 470 may be rigid, semi-rigid, or flexible. The neoleaflet element 470 is coupled to the base 420 in a manner that exerts a mechanical, one-way force to provide a valve function that responds to differential pressure conditions across the neoleaflet element. In response to one prescribed differential pressure condition, the neoleaflet element 470 will deflect and, with a native leaflet, assume a valve opened condition. In response to another prescribed pressure condition, the neoleaflet element 470 will resist deflection and, by coaptation with a native leaflet (or a companion neoleaflet element) at, above, or below the annulus plane, maintain a valve closed condition.
In the context of the illustrated embodiment (when installed in a mitral valve annulus), the neoleaflet element resists being moved in the cranial (superior) direction (into the atrium), when the pressure in the ventricle exceeds the pressure in the atrium—as it would during ventricular systole. The neoleaflet element 470 may move, however, in the caudal (inferior) direction (into the ventricle), when the pressure in the ventricle is less than the pressure in the atrium—as it would during ventricular diastole. The neoleaflet element 470 thereby mimics the one-way valve function of a native leaflet, to prevent retrograde flow.
The implant 400 is sized and shaped so that, in use adjacent the valve annulus of the mitral valve, it keeps the native valve leaflet closed during ventricular systole (as shown in
The functional characteristics of the implant 400 just described can be imparted to the neoleaflet element 470 in various ways. For example, hinges and springs (mechanical or plastic) can be used to couple the bridge to the base. Desirably, the implant 400 is made from materials that provide it with spring-like characteristics.
As shown in
More particularly, in the illustrated mitral valve embodiment, when greater pressure exists superior to the bridge 430 than inferior to the bridge (i.e., during ventricular diastole), the shape and material properties of the bridge 430 accommodate its deflection into the ventricle—i.e., an opened valve condition (as
The implant 400 may be delivered percutaneously, thoracoscopically through the chest, or using open heart surgical techniques. If delivered percutaneously, the implant 400 may be made from a superelastic material (for example superelastic Nitinol alloy) enabling it to be folded and collapsed such that it can be delivered in a catheter, and will subsequently self-expand into the desired shape and tension when released from the catheter.
For example, percutaneous vascular access can be achieved by conventional methods into the femoral or jugular vein. As
The distal end of the catheter 58 encloses an implant 400, like that shown in
The implant 400 may be fixed to the annulus in various ways. For example, the implant 400 may be secured to the annulus with sutures or other attachment means (i.e. barbs, hooks, staples, etc.) Also, the implant 400 may be secured with struts or tabs 450 (see
In this arrangement, the struts 450 are desirably sized and configured to contact tissue near or within the heart valve annulus to brace the base 420 against migration within the annulus during the one-way valve function of the neoleaflet element. In this arrangement, it is also desirable that the base 420 be “elastic,” i.e., the material of the base 420 is selected to possess a desired spring constant. This means that the base 420 is sized and configured to possess a normal, unloaded, shape or condition (shown in
As the preceding disclosure demonstrates, different forms of heart valve treatment can be performed using a single implant.
Implants having one or more of the technical features just described, to thereby function in situ as a neo-leaflet, may be sized and configured in various ways. Various illustrative embodiments will now be described.
In
In addition, the implant 600 includes an orientation and stabilization framework 610 that may extend from the annulus to the atrial dome. In
Preferably the framework 610 does not interfere with atrial contractions, but instead is compliant enough to contract with the atrium. As such, the implant 600 may have nonuniform flexibility to improve its function within the heart.
In
As can be seen, a given implant may carry various structures or mechanisms to enhance the anchorage and stabilization of the implant in the heart valve annulus. The mechanisms may be located below the plane of the annulus, to engage infra-annular heart tissue adjoining the annulus in the ventricle, and/or be located at or above the plane of the annulus, to engage tissue on the annulus or in the atrium. These mechanisms increase the surface area of contact between the implant and tissue. A given implant can also include tissue in-growth surfaces, to provide an environment that encourages the in-growth of neighboring tissue on the implant. Once in-growth occurs, the implant becomes resistant to migration or dislodgment from the annulus. Conventional in-growth materials such as polyester fabric can be used.
In this embodiment, the duckbill valve 1210 replaces the native anterior and posterior leaflets. The duckbill valve 1210 serves as dual neo-leaflets, which mutually open and close in response to changes in pressure, replacing the function of the native leaflets.
When the implant 1200 is used to replace a mitral valve (see
In
While the new devices and methods have been more specifically described in the context of the treatment of a mitral heart valve, it should be understood that other heart valve types can be treated in the same or equivalent fashion. By way of example, and not by limitation, the present systems and methods could be used to prevent or resist retrograde flow in any heart valve annulus, including the tricuspid valve, the pulmonary valve, or the aortic valve. In addition, other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. The specification and examples should be considered exemplary and merely descriptive of key technical features and principles, and are not meant to be limiting. The true scope and spirit of the invention are defined by the following claims. As will be easily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, variations and modifications of each of the disclosed embodiments can be easily made within the scope of this invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/981,025 filed 31 Oct. 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,016,882), which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/676,815, filed Oct. 1, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4056854 | Boretos et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4275469 | Gabbay | Jun 1981 | A |
4994069 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5358518 | Camilli | Oct 1994 | A |
5360444 | Kusuhara | Nov 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5545241 | Vanderauwera et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5607465 | Camilli | Mar 1997 | A |
5716397 | Myers | Feb 1998 | A |
5776189 | Khalid | Jul 1998 | A |
5792155 | Van Cleef | Aug 1998 | A |
5824061 | Quijano | Oct 1998 | A |
5830224 | Cohn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961440 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045497 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050936 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059715 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077214 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099542 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102932 | Kurz | Aug 2000 | A |
6162168 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165119 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183411 | Mortier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210432 | Solem et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254564 | Wilk et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261222 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287334 | Moll et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287339 | Vazquez et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299637 | Shaolian | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312464 | Navia | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312465 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332864 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332893 | Mortier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338735 | Stevens | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338740 | Carpentier | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419695 | Gabbay | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419696 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478819 | Moe | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494909 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503272 | Duerig | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514194 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530952 | Vesely | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537198 | Vidlund et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6569196 | Vesely | May 2003 | B1 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602286 | Strecker | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605112 | Moll et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616684 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626899 | Houser et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656221 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669709 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669724 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676698 | McGuckin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676699 | Shiu | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685739 | DiMatteo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702826 | Liddicoat et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709456 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716241 | Wilder et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723038 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6752828 | Thornton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764510 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773454 | Wholey et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790237 | Stinson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793618 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6821297 | Snyders | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840957 | DiMatteo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6893459 | Macoviak | May 2005 | B1 |
6913608 | Liddicoat et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6945978 | Hyde | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6951571 | Srivastava | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6974474 | Pavcnik | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979350 | Moll et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7004176 | Lau | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7070618 | Streeter | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7125418 | Duran et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128759 | Osborne et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153324 | Case et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159593 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160320 | Duran | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163556 | Xie et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166126 | Spence et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195641 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7291168 | Macoviak et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311730 | Gabbay | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7338520 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347869 | Hojeibane et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351256 | Hojeibane et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377938 | Sarac et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381220 | Macoviak et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399315 | Iobbi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452371 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458987 | Case et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7503928 | Case et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524331 | Birdsall | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527646 | Rahdert et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7569072 | Berg et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7604661 | Pavcnik et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611534 | Kapadia et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618447 | Case et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648527 | Agnew | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7670368 | Hill et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678144 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678145 | Vidlund et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682390 | Seguin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686844 | Case et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717952 | Case et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722666 | Lafontaine | May 2010 | B2 |
7748389 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753949 | Lamphere et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7799069 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803185 | Gabbay | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806921 | Hoffman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815673 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837727 | Goetz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846199 | Paul et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867274 | Hill et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871434 | Case et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896915 | Guyenot et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914575 | Guyenot et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947075 | Goetz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7951189 | Haverkost et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955375 | Agnew | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7955377 | Melsheimer | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959670 | Bolduc | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967853 | Eidenschink et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002824 | Jenson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012198 | Hill et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016882 | Macoviak et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8038708 | Case et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043360 | McNamara et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048153 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052749 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057532 | Hoffman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070802 | Lamphere et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8075611 | Millwee et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092518 | Schreck | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8092520 | Quadri | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100962 | Agnew et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109996 | Stacchino et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118866 | Herrmann et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128681 | Shoemaker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133270 | Kheradvar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142494 | Rahdert et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8182528 | Salahieh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8216303 | Navia | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226707 | White | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231670 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8246678 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252052 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8287584 | Salahieh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308798 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8328868 | Paul et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343213 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8403979 | Paul, Jr. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414641 | Stocker et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454684 | Bergin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460365 | Haverkost et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20010010017 | Letac et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010051824 | Hopkins et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020032481 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065554 | Streeter | May 2002 | A1 |
20020094573 | Bell | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123802 | Snyders | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129820 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138138 | Yang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030014104 | Cribier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030120340 | Liska et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030233022 | Vidlund et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040127981 | Rahdert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138745 | Macoviak et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148019 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040243107 | Macoviak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010287 | Macoviak et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055089 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050228468 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245906 | Makower et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267573 | Macoviak et al. | Dec 2005 | A9 |
20060069430 | Rahdert et al. | Mar 2006 | A9 |
20060241745 | Solem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080065204 | Macoviak et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140190 | Macoviak et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090005763 | Makower et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043381 | Macoviak et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090228099 | Rahdert et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110319990 | Macoviak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120185040 | Rahdert et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130079869 | Straubinger et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130096664 | Goetz et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130123908 | Hinchliffe et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130178929 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Templeton III et al. “Experimental Reconstruction of Cardiac Valves by Venous Pericardial Grafts”, Annals of Surgery vol. 129 No. 2, Feb. 1949 pp. 161-176. |
Moore et al. “Unsuitability of Transventricular Autogenous Slings for Diminishing Valvular Insufficiency”, Surgery vol. 33, No. 2, Feb. 1953 pp. 173-182. |
Murray et al., “Reconstruction of the Valves of the Heart”, The Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 38, No. 4, Apr. 1938 pp. 317-319. |
Bolling et al., “Early Outcome of Mitral Valve Reconstruction in Patients with End-Stage Cardiomyopathy”, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995; 109;676-683. |
Kameda et al. “Annuloplasty for Severe Mitral Regurgitation Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy”, Ann. Thorac. Surg 1996; 61:1829-1832. |
Harlan et al. Manual of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 2 1981 , Figs 16.3-16.4. |
Edmunds Jr. et al., “Septal Defect” Atlas of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1990. |
Koniaris et al. “Dynamic Retention: A Technique for Closure of the Complex Abdomen in Critically Ill Patients”, Archives of Surgery, vol. 136, No. 12, Dec. 2001; pp. 1359-1362. |
Fucci et al. “Improved Results with Mitral Valve Repair Using New Surgical Technniques”, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 9 1996; pp. 621-626. |
Wilson, “Studies in Experimental Mitral Obstruction in Relation to the Surgical Treatment of Mitral Stenosis”, The British Journal of Surgery, Vo. 18, No. 70, 1931, pp. 259-274. |
Bailey et al., “Surgical Repair of Mitral Insufficiency”, Diseases of the Chest, vol. XIX, No. 2, Feb. 1951; pp. 125-137. |
Henderson et al., “The Surgical Treatment of Mitral Insufficiency”, Experimental Use of Transplanted Pericardium in Dogs, Surgery 33(6)858-868; 1953. |
Sakakibara “A Surgical Approach to the Correction of Mitral Insufficiency”, Annals of Surgery, vol. 142, No. 2, Aug. 1955; pp. 196-203. |
Harken et al., “The Surgical Correction of Mitral Insuificciency”, The Journal of Thoracic Surgery 28(6):604-627; 1954. |
Bailey et al. “The Surgical Correction of Mitral Insufficnecy by the Use of Pericardial Grafts”, The Journal of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 28, No. 6, Dec. 1954; pp. 551-603. |
Kay et al. “Surgical Treatment of Mitral Insufficiency”, Sugery, vol. 37, No. 5, May 1955; pp. 697-706. |
de Silva et al “Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Defect. An Efficacious Technique for Early Surgical Repair”, J. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jan. 1989; 97(1):86-9. |
Tashiro et al. “Extended Endocardial Repair of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: New Operative Technique”, J Card Surg Mar. 1994; 9(2)97-102. |
Daggett, “Surgical Technique for Early Repair of Posterior Ventricular Septal Rupture” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Aug. 1982 84(2)306-12. |
Daggett et al. “Surgery for Post-Myocardial Infarct Ventricular Septal Defect”. Ann Surg. Sep. 1977, 186(3): 260-71. |
Dor, “Left Ventricular Aneurysms: The Endoventricular Circular Patch Plasty”, Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Apr. 1997; 9(2):123-30. |
Antunes “Submitral Left Ventricular Aneurysms. Correction by a New Transatrial Approach”, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Aug. 1987; 94(2):241-5. |
Alvarez et al. “Technical Improvements in the Repair of Acute Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture”, J Card Surg. Sep. 1992; 7(3):198-202. |
Cox, “Surg Manage. of Left Vent Aneurysms” A Clarification of the Simil. and Diff. Between the Jatene and Dor Techniques Semin Thorac Cardiovsc Surg Apr. 1997 9(2):131-8. |
Skillington et al. “Surg. Treat. for Infarct-Related Ventr. Septal Def. Improved Early Res. Comb w/Analysis of Late Func. Stat.” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg May 1990 99(5) 798-808. |
Salati et al., “Severe Diastolic Dysfunction After Endoventriculoplasty” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Apr. 1995, 109(4): 694-701. |
Davila et al. “Circumfential Suture of the Mitral Ring: A Method for the Surg. Correction of Mitral Insufficiency” Jour of Thorac Surg. Nov. 1955; 30(5); 531-60. |
Harken etal. “The Surgical Correction of Mitral Insufficiency” Jour of Thorac Surgery Dec. 1954; 28(6): 604-24. |
Kuykendall et al. “Surgical Correction of Chronic Mitral Insufficiency in Dogs”, Surgery. Oct. 1958; 44(4) 718-25. |
Davila et al. “A Method for the Surgical Correction of Mitral Insufficiency”, Surg. Gyno. & Obstetrics, Apr. 1954, 98(4): 407-12. |
Glover et al., “The Treatment of Mitral Insufficiency by the Purse-String Technique”, Jour of Thorac Surg. Jan. 1957; 33(1): 75-101. |
Rankin et al. “A Clinical Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair vs Valve Replacmeent in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation”, J. Thorac. Cardio. Surg. Feb. 1988; 95(2): 165-77. |
Harken et al. “The Surgical Correction of Mitral Insufficiency”, Surg. Forum 4:4-7, 1953. |
Davila et al “The Clinical & Physiologic Criteria for Surgical Correction of Mitral Insufficiency” Jour of Thorac Surg. Feb. 1958; 35(2):208-31. |
Barnard et al. “A Surgical Approach to Mitral Insufficiency” Br J Surg. May 1961; 48:655-62. |
McKenzie et al. “Current Concepts in Surgical Correction of Acquired Mitral Insufficiency” Circulation, Oct. 1963; 28:603-16. |
Saab et al., “Left Ventricular Aneurysm: A New Surgical Approach”, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, Feb. 1989; 37(1):11-9. |
Cicek et al. “Left Ventricular Endoan: Effect on Left Ventricular Size, Shape and Function”, Cardiology, Jul.-Aug. 1997, 88(4)340-5. |
Liedtke et al., “Functional Reductions in Left Ventricular Volume” Jour Thorac Cardio. Surg. Feb. 1976; 71(2)195-206. |
Sosa et al., Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Assoc with Postinfarction Aneurysm Results of Left Ventricular Reconstruction, Jour Thorac Cardio Surg. May 1992, 103(5)855-60. |
Cooley, “Repair of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Defect” Jour Card Surg. Jul. 1994 9:4):427-9. |
Jatene, “Left Ventricular Aneurysmectomy Resection or Reconstruction”, Jour Thorac Card. Surg. 1985; 89:321-31. |
Wilson, “Studies in Experimental Mitral Obstruction in Relation to the Surgical Treatment of Mitral Stenosis”, The British Journal of Surgery; vol. XVIII No. 70:259-74; 1931. |
Yacoub et al. “Anatomic Correction of the Syndrome of Prolapsing Right Coronary Aortic Cusp . . . ”, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Feb. 1997: 113(2): 253-261. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110319990 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11981025 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13227630 | US | |
Parent | 10676815 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11981025 | US |