The features of the invention are generally applicable to devices, systems, and methods that support tissue and/or structures within a hollow body organ. In a more particular sense, the features of the invention are applicable to improving heart function by supporting tissue and related structures in the heart, e.g., for the treatment of conditions such as congestive heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation and/or septal defects.
Hollow body organs are shaped in particular native ways to perform specific native functions. When a body organ looses its native shape due to disease, injury, or simply the natural aging process, the native functions can be adversely affected. The heart serves as a good example of this marriage between native shape and native function, as well as the dysfunctions that can occur should the native shape change.
I. The Anatomy of a Healthy Heart
The heart (see
The heart has four chambers, two on each side—the right and left atria, and the right and left ventricles. The atria are the blood-receiving chambers, which pump blood into the ventricles. A wall composed of membranous and muscular parts, called the interatrial septum, separates the right and left atria. The ventricles are the blood-discharging chambers. A wall composed of membranous and muscular parts, called the interventricular septum, separates the right and left ventricles.
The synchronous pumping actions of the left and right sides of the heart constitute the cardiac cycle. The cycle begins with a period of ventricular relaxation, called ventricular diastole. The cycle ends with a period of ventricular contraction, called ventricular systole.
The heart has four valves (see
At the beginning of ventricular diastole (i.e., ventricular filling) (see
The heart valves are defined by fibrous rings of collagen, each called an annulus, which forms a part of the fibrous skeleton of the heart. The annulus provides attachments for the cusps or leaflets of the valves. In a healthy heart, muscles and their tendinous chords (chordae tendineae) support the valves, allowing the leaflets of the valves to open and close in accordance with their intended functions.
II. Heart Dysfunctions
Infection, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, other diseases, or anatomic defects can adversely affect the normal synchronous pumping actions of the left and right sides of the heart and/or the operation of heart valves during the cardiac cycle.
For example, due to one or more of these causes, a heart chamber may become stretched and enlarged. This condition can lead to adverse consequences. For example, (1) due to its enlarged condition the heart must pump harder to move the blood, and/or too little blood may move from the heart to the rest of the body. Over time, other chambers of the heart may also become weaker. The stretching and enlargement of a heart chamber, e.g., in the left ventricle, can lead to a condition called congestive heart failure. If not treated, congestive heart failure can lead to pulmonary embolisms, circulatory shutdown, and death.
The enlargement of a heart chamber can also lead to the enlargement or stretching a heart valve annulus. Also, the stretching or tearing of the chords surrounding a heart valve, or other forms of muscle failure in this region, can also change the shape of a heart valve annulus, even when enlargement of a heart chamber is absent. When the heart valve annulus changes its shape, the valve leaflets can fail to coapt. An undesired back flow of blood can occur between an atrium and a ventricle (called regurgitation), or back flow between an artery and a ventricle can occur. Such dysfunctions can eventually also weaken the heart and can result in heart failure.
Anatomic defects, e.g., in the septum, can also lead to heart dysfunction. These defects can be congenital, or they can result from disease or injury.
III. Prior Treatment Modalities
Medications can be successful in treating heart dysfunctions. For chronic or acute dysfunction, however, surgery is often necessary. For congestive heart failure, a heart transplant may be required. Like invasive, open heart surgical approaches have been used to repair or replace a dysfunctional heart valves or to correct septal defects.
The need remains for simple, cost-effective, and less invasive devices, systems, and methods for treating heart conditions such as congestive heart failure and/or heart valve dysfunction and/or septal defects. A parallel need also remains for similarly treating other dysfunctions that arise from unintended shape changes in other body organs.
The invention provides devices, systems and methods that support tissue in a hollow body organ for the purpose of restoring or maintaining native function of the organ. The devices, systems, and methods do not require invasive, open surgical approaches to be implemented, but, instead, lend themselves to catheter-based, intra-vascular and/or percutaneous techniques.
One aspect of the invention provides systems and methods for supporting tissue within a hollow body organ. The systems and methods employ first and second implants that are coupled together. The first implant is sized and configured to penetrate a first region of tissue in the hollow body organ. The second implant is sized and configured to penetrate a second region of tissue in the hollow body organ spatially distinct from the first region. At least one tension element couples the first and second implants together, to apply tension to the first and second implants, and thereby draw tissue inward, supporting it. The supporting effect serves, e.g., to draw tissue surfaces together to reduce tissue volume within the hollow body organ, as well as resist subsequent enlargement of tissue volume. Desirably, the supporting effect does not interfere with contraction of the hollow body organ to a lesser tissue volume. However, if desired, this form of bracing can be achieved.
Another aspect of the invention provides systems and methods for forming a tissue fold within a hollow body organ. The systems and methods employ first and second implants. The implants are sized and configured to penetrate spatially distinct regions of tissue in the hollow body organ. At least one tension element couples the first and second implants together to apply tension on the first and second implants. The tension creates a tissue fold between the first and second implants. The tissue fold serves, e.g., to reduce internal tissue volume within the hollow body organ, as well as resist subsequent enlargement of tissue volume. Desirably, the tensioning does not interfere with contraction of the hollow body organ to a lesser tissue volume. However, if desired, this form of bracing can be achieved with tissue folding.
In one embodiment, the first and second implants are part of an array of implants that penetrates spatially distinct regions of tissue in the hollow body organ. In this embodiment, at least one tension element extends among the array of implants to apply tension between adjacent implants and thereby create a pattern of multiple tissue folds. The multiple tissue folds serve, e.g., to draw a circumferential region of tissue together, forming a closure or seal.
Another aspect of the invention provides systems and methods for supporting tissue in a hollow body organ. The systems and methods employ a prosthesis sized and configured for placement either within an interior of the hollow body organ or about an exterior of the hollow body organ to regulate a maximum size and/or shape of the hollow body organ. The systems and methods also employ at least one fastener to secure the prosthesis to tissue in the hollow body organ. In one embodiment, the fastener comprises a helical fastener.
Another aspect of the invention provides systems and methods for supporting tissue within a hollow body organ making use of an elongated implant. The elongated implant is sized and configured to penetrate tissue and extend along a curvilinear path within or partially within a tissue wall. The elongated implant regulates a maximum size and/or shape of the hollow body organ. In one embodiment, the elongated implant comprises a helical shape.
The systems and methods that embody all or some of the various aspects of the invention, as described, are well suited for use in, e.g., a heart. The systems and methods can be used to support tissue within a heart chamber, e.g., of congestive heart failure or other conditions in which the volume of the heart becomes enlarged. The systems and methods can be used to seal or close perforations, holes, or defects in tissue. The systems and methods can be used to close or seal atrial appendages or septal defects.
Other features and advantages of the invention shall be apparent based upon the accompanying description, drawings, and claims.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention, which may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
The technology disclosed in this specification is divided for clarity of presentation into sections, as follows:
It should be appreciated that the technology described in a given section can be combined with technology described in another section, and that there are features that are common to all technology described herein.
I. Implants for Externally Supporting Tissue in a Hollow Body Organ
A. Overview
The body 12 includes a distal region 14. The distal region 14 is sized and configured to penetrate tissue. The body 12 and its distal region 14 are sized and configured to take purchase in tissue (see
The body 12 also includes a proximal region 16. The proximal region 16 is sized and configured to engage an instrument or tool 20 (see
As shown in
The tether element 18 comprises a thread, braid, wire, or tube structure with a metallic or polymer material (e.g., polyester suture) having a break strength that is desirably at least equal to the resistance the distal region 14 of the body 12 has to release or migration from tissue. The tether element 18 is desirably flexible, to enable its deployment through an intra-vascular path. The tether element 18 is desirably not significantly elastic, but it can be, depending upon the tissue conditions encountered.
The tether element 18 is securely fastened to the proximal region 16, e.g., by soldering, gluing, riveting, or like attachment techniques. The junction between the tether element 18 and the body 12 desirably has a material strength that is greater than the material strength of the tether element 18 itself.
The body 12 of the implant 10 can take various forms. In the illustrated embodiment (as
Also, in the illustrated embodiment (as
The system 24 includes at least one clip element 26 joined to the tether elements 18 of the implants 10.
The length of each individual tether element 18 and the magnitude of the tension it applies to its respective implant 10 collectively dictate a maximum shape for the body organ. In this way, the system 24 supports and shapes tissue in a body organ.
The system 24 as just described can be established in various parts of the body and for various therapeutic purposes. Two embodiments will be described for the purpose of illustration. The first embodiment is directed to the treatment and/or repair of congestive heart failure. The second embodiment is directed to heart valve remodeling.
B. Systems and Methods for Supporting Tissue in a Heart Chamber
In the intra-vascular approach shown in
The guide component 28 can comprise, e.g., a guide sheath that desirably has a steerable or deflectable distal tip. The guide wire can be withdrawn after the guide component 28 is deployed and positioned, so that the applier instrument 20 can be introduced through the guide component 28, as
In this arrangement (see
The implantation force of the drive mechanism 22 is desirably resolved in some manner to provide positional stability and resist unintended movement of the drive mechanism 22 relative to the implantation site. A resolution force is desirably applied to counteract and/or oppose the implantation force of the drive mechanism 22. It is desirable to resolve some or all or a substantial portion of the implantation force within the vessel lumen (or other hollow body organ) itself, and preferably as close to the implantation site as possible.
The tubular body of the guide component 28 and/or the shaft of the applier instrument 20 can be sized and configured to possess sufficient column strength to resolve some or all or at least a portion of the implantation force within the vessel lumen or hollow body organ.
The guide component 28 is reposition in succession to other intended myocardial delivery sites. At each site, the applier instrument 20 is actuated to place an implant 10. In this way (see
Once the desired number of implants 10 are deployed inside the left ventricle, the applier instrument 20 is withdrawn from the guide component 28. The tether elements 18 of the implants 10 are left gathered and channeled through the guide component 28, as
As
Once in the left ventricle, the clip-applier instrument 36 is held stationary, while the tether elements are pulled taut through the clip-applier instrument 36 (shown by arrow T is
The system 24 has been established to support the left ventricle to treat, in this instance, congestive heart failure.
It should be appreciated that one or more implants 10 of the system 24 can be electrically coupled to a device that can be operated to control muscular and/or electrical activity in heart tissue. Absent this intended effect, however, it is desired that the implants 10 are not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
C. Systems and Methods to Support Tissue at or Near a Heart Valve Annulus
The intra-vascular approach shown in
The guide component 28 is positioned in succession at intended implant delivery sites at or near the inferior region of the aortic valve annulus. At each site, the applier instrument 20 is actuated to place an implant 10.
Once the desired number of implants 10 are deployed at or near the aortic valve annulus, the applier instrument 20 is withdrawn, and the clip-applier instrument 36 is tracked through the guide component 28 and over the bundle of tether elements 18 into the left ventricle (see
Once the clip-applier instrument 36 is in place, the tether elements 18 are pulled taut. Growing taut, the tether elements 18 apply tension on the individual implants 10, as the arrows in
The system 24 has been established to reshape the aortic valve annulus to treat, in this instance, congestive heart failure and/or retrograde flow through the aortic valve. The system 24 can also be used to treat retrograde flow through any other heart valve, e.g., the mitral valve.
It should be appreciated that one or more implants 10 of the system 24 can be electrically coupled to a device that can be operated to control muscular and/or electrical activity in heart tissue. Absent this intended effect, however, it is desired that the implants 10 are not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
II. Implants for Creating Tissue Folds
A. Overview
The tissue folding system 38 as just described can be established in various parts of the body and for various therapeutic purposes.
B. Systems and Methods Defining Discrete Tissue Folds
The embodiment shown in
In the intra-vascular approach into the left ventricle, as shown in
As
Alternatively, or in combination with the clip element 42, the implants 10 and 40 can include interlocking structural components 46 (see
As shown in
In the foregoing embodiments, a single tether element 18 has been used to apply tension between the implant 10 that carries the tether element 18 and another implant 40 that does not. Alternatively, as shown in
In any of the foregoing manners, the system 38 can be established to reduce the interior volume of a heart chamber to treat, in this instance, a left ventricle affected by congestive heart failure.
The tether element(s) 18 may be elastic and/or possess a spring constant and/or be shaped and/or be otherwise compliant in the region between the implants 10 and 40. This material characteristic can help minimize or dampen peak load conditions upon the system 38, particularly when the tissue region is dynamic, as is the case with cardiac tissue.
1. Tissue Folding with Overlaying Patch Component
As shown in
The patch component 50, when installed, comprises a relatively planar frame, or a sheet of prosthetic material, or combinations thereof. The patch material is selected on the basis of its biocompatibility, durability, and flexible mechanical properties. The patch material can comprise a polymeric or metallic material, e.g., polyester, or ePTFE, or a malleable plastic or metal material, or a self-expanding plastic or metal material like Nitinol® wire. The patch material desirably possesses some elasticity, e.g., by using stretchable materials and/or weaves/knits, like Spandex™ material or elastic waist bands. The patch material also desirably possesses a resistance to expansion. The material may be drug coated or embedded with drugs, such as with heparin.
The patch component 50 is desirable sized and configured to permit non-invasive deployment of the prosthesis by an intra-vascular catheter. In this respect, the patch component 50 is desirably sized and configured to assume a compressed or collapsed, low profile condition, to permit its intra-vascular introduction into the hollow body organ by a catheter. The patch component 50 is likewise desirably sized and configured for expansion in situ from a collapsed condition into an expanded condition for contact with tissue overlaying the fold 44.
The patch component 50 carry radiopaque markers to help fluoroscopically position it. The markers can take the form, e.g. of marker bands, tight wound coils, or wire made from radiopaque materials such as platinum, platinum/iridium, or gold.
The guide elements 60 comprise wires with eyes 62. In the illustrated embodiment, the eyes 62 are secured to the patch component 50 by releasable suture 64. The suture 64 can, e.g., comprise a loop that is threaded through each eye 62 and the patch component 50. The ends of the suture loop extend out the proximal end of the catheter 58. Pulling on one end of the suture loop will withdraw the suture 64 from the eyes 62, thereby releasing the patch component 50.
The guide elements 60 (and/or the patch component 50 itself) are desirably biased to hold the patch component 50, once released, in an open and taut fashion, as
It should be appreciated that one or more implants 10 and/or 40 of the system 38, or the implants 56 associated with the patch component 50, can be electrically coupled to a device that can be operated to control muscular and/or electrical activity in heart tissue. Absent this intended effect, however, it is desired that the implants 10 and/or 40, or the patch component 50 are not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
C. Systems and Methods Defining Patterns of Tissue Folds
1. Overview
As
The system 52 as just described can be established in various parts of the body and for various therapeutic purposes. Two embodiments will be described for the purpose of illustration. The first embodiment is directed to isolation or sealing of an atrial appendage in the treatment of, e.g., atrial fibrillation. The second embodiment is directed to the repair of perforations, holes, or defects in tissue, e.g., atrial or ventricular septal defects.
2. Appendage Isolation/Sealing
As shown in
The tether element 18 of the implant 10 is cinched through an adjacent implant 40, which, in turn, is cinched through the next adjacent implant 40, and so on. The cinching between adjacent implants creates a fold 44. The cinching between a sequence of adjacent annular implants creates a pattern of adjacent, folds 44 about the native junction.
The tether element 18—cinched sequentially about the implants 10 and 40—is held in tension by a clip element 54. The system 52 draws the junction together, thereby essentially closing the atrial appendage from blood flow communication with the remainder of the atrium. The number and pattern of implants 10 and 40 in the system 52 can vary according to the size and geometry of the targeted junction sought to be isolated and sealed.
The system 52 can be deployed to seal or otherwise isolate an atrial appendage, either by open surgical techniques or intra-vascular access, using the instruments and methodologies that have been previously described.
It should be appreciated that a patch component 50 like that shown in
3. Closing Perforations, Holes, or Defects
The system 52 shown in
The number and pattern of implants 10 and 40 in the system 52 can vary according to the size and geometry of the targeted junction sought to be isolated and sealed. Furthermore, the system 52 can be deployed to seal a perforation, hole of defect in tissue either by open surgical techniques or intra-vascular access, using the instruments and methodologies previously described.
It should be appreciated that, given the dimensions of the perforation, hole, or defect, a discrete system 38 like that shown in
In one embodiment (see
In the foregoing indications in the heart, it is desired that the implants 10 and/or 40, and the patch component 50 and its associated fasteners 56, are not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
III. Prostheses for Externally Supporting Tissue in a Hollow Body Organ
A. Overview
The body 72 can comprise a fully formed, three dimensional structure, as
In the illustrated embodiments, the body 72 is shown to include a prosthetic material 74. The prosthetic material 14 is selected on the basis of its biocompatibility, durability, and flexible mechanical properties. The material 74 can comprise, e.g., woven polyester or ePTFE. The prosthetic material 74 desirably possesses some elasticity, e.g., by using stretchable materials and/or weaves/knits, like Spandex™ material or elastic waist bands. The prosthetic material 74 also desirably possesses limited expansion or a resistance to expansion that can increase rapidly. The prosthetic material 74 may be drug coated or embedded with drugs on the inside surface, such as with heparin. Alternatively, the prosthetic material 74 may be relatively non-compliant, but can be compressed along with the rest of the prosthesis by crumpling, folding, etc. The prosthetic material 74 could also comprise a polymeric or metallic grid structure.
In the illustrated embodiments, the prosthetic material 74 is shown to be supported by a scaffold-like structure 76. It should be appreciated, however, that the prosthetic material 74 could be free of a scaffold-like structure 76, or, conversely, the scaffold-like structure 76 could be free of a prosthetic material 74.
The prosthetic material 74 and/or scaffold-like structure 76 are desirable sized and configured to permit non-invasive deployment of the prosthesis by an intra-vascular catheter. With this criteria in mind, the prosthetic material 74 and/or scaffold-like structure 76 are sized and configured to assume a compressed or collapsed, low profile condition, to permit their intra-vascular introduction into the hollow body organ by a catheter. Also with this criteria in mind, the prosthetic material 74 and/or scaffold-like structure 76 are sized and configured for expansion in situ from a collapsed condition into an expanded condition in contact with tissue in the targeted region.
In this respect, the scaffold-like structure 76, if present, can comprise, e.g., a malleable plastic or metal material that expands in the presence of an applied force. In this arrangement, the deployment catheter can include, e.g., an expandable body, such as a balloon, to apply the expansion force to the scaffold-like structure 76 in situ. Alternatively, the scaffold-like structure 76, if present, can comprise a self-expanding plastic or metal material (e.g., from Nitinol® wire) that can be compressed in the presence of a force, but self-expands upon removal of the compressive force. In this arrangement, the deployment catheter can include, e.g., a sleeve that can be manipulated to enclosed the scaffold-like structure 76 in a collapsed condition, thereby applying the compressive force, and to release the scaffold-like structure 76 when desired to allow the scaffold-like structure 76 to self-expand in situ.
The scaffold-like structure 76 can take various alternative forms, some of which are shown for the purpose of illustration. The scaffold-like structure 76 can include longitudinally extending spines, which form an umbrella-like structure shown in
The prosthesis body 72 can carry radiopaque markers to help fluoroscopically position the prosthesis. The markers can take the form, e.g. of marker bands, tight wound coils, or wire made from radiopaque materials such as platinum, platinum/iridium, or gold.
The structural strength of the prosthesis 70 resists distension of the tissue wall en masse beyond the maximum size and shaped imposed by the prosthesis body 72. In this way, the prosthesis body 72 dictates a maximum size and shape for the body organ. However, the prosthesis body 72 does not interfere with the contraction of the hollow body organ to a lesser size and shape.
Desirably, as
The fasteners 56 can be variously constructed. They can, e.g., comprise staples or (as shown) helical fasteners, like that shown in
The prosthesis 70 as just described can be installed in various parts of the body and for various therapeutic purposes. Two embodiments will be described for the purpose of illustration. The first embodiment is directed to implantation within a heart chamber for treatment and/or repair of congestive heart failure. The second embodiment is directed to implantation in a heart valve annulus for heart valve remodeling.
B. Systems and Methods for Supporting Tissue in a Heart Chamber
The presence of the prosthesis 70 shapes the left ventricle in a desired fashion, pulling the chamber walls laterally closer together and thereby reducing the overall maximum internal volume. The presence of the prosthesis 70 resists further enlargement of the left ventricle during ventricular diastole and provides a shape is better suited to efficient ventricular pumping. However, the presence of the prosthesis 70 does not interfere with contraction of the left ventricle during ventricular systole.
In this embodiment, it is desired that the prosthesis 70 is not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
In the intra-vascular approach shown in
The first catheter 78 carries the prosthesis 70 in a radially reduced or collapsed configuration. Once inside the left ventricle (see
The guide component 28 (previously described) is delivered over the guide wire 80 (which is then withdrawn) (see
As
The prosthesis 70 has been installed to shape the left ventricle to treat, in this instance, congestive heart failure.
In an alternative embodiment, the prosthesis 70 could be sized and configured to contain a fluid, e.g., saline or blood. For example, the prosthesis 70 can carry fluid receiving tubes or pockets. The delivery of fluid causes the tubes or pockets to expand, thereby enlarging the occupying volume of the prosthesis 70. As a result, the usable internal volume of the heart chamber is reduced.
As shown in
The system 82 comprising an array of discrete patch components 50 can shape all or a portion of the ventricles, resisting further enlargement of the ventricles and provides a shape is better suited to efficient ventricular pumping. The presence of the patch components 50, however, desirably does not interfere with contraction of the ventricles to a lesser volume.
The prostheses 70 and prosthesis system 82 shown and described in foregoing
C. Systems and Methods for Support Tissue at or Near a Heart Valve Annulus
In this embodiment, the body 72 includes prosthetic material 74 that promotes tissue ingrowth, to aid in fixing the prosthesis 70 to tissue in or near the annulus. In this embodiment, it is desired that the material of the prosthesis body 72 is not inherently electrically conductive, so as not to interfere with electrical conduction within the heart.
As before described, the prosthesis body 72 in this embodiment is also desirable sized and configured to permit its non-invasive deployment by an intra-vascular catheter. Alternatively, however, the prosthesis body 72 can be installed using conventional open heart surgical techniques or by thoracoscopic surgery techniques.
In this arrangement, the prosthesis body 72 desirably includes eyelet regions 84 to receive fasteners 56, so that the prosthesis 70 can be secured to tissue in or near the targeted heart valve annulus.
As
The prosthesis 70 shown and described in foregoing
The valve assembly 100 includes a flexible valve member 106. In the illustrated embodiment, the valve member comprises three, coapting leaflets 108, although the number of leaflets 108 can vary, e.g., between two and four.
In use (see
As previously described with respect to the prosthesis 70, regions of the scaffold-like structure 102 and/or prosthetic material 104 can be specially sized and configured for the receipt and retention of fasteners 56. The fasteners 56 can be variously constructed. They can, e.g., comprise staples or (as shown) helical fasteners, like that shown in
The valve assembly 100 as just described can be installed in the region of a heart valve annulus by intra-vascular approach. However, it should be appreciated that the assembly 100 can be installed using an open surgical procedure.
Using an intra-vascular approach (see
The valve assembly 100 is then be pushed out of the lumen of the catheter 110 (as
The applier instrument 20 carries a helical fastener 56. The applier instrument 20 rotates the fastener 56, causing it to penetrate the myocardium.
The valve assembly 100 has been installed to repair, or replace, or supplement a native heart valve.
The valve assembly 100 shown and described in foregoing
IV. Implants for Internally Supporting Tissue in a Hollow Body Organ
The body 88 can possess a generally straight or linear configuration, as
The body 88 includes a distal region 90. The distal region 90 is sized and configured to penetrate tissue.
The body 88 also includes a proximal region 92. As shown in
The body 88 and its distal region 90 are sized and configured to be implanted within or partially within tissue in a hollow body organ. The linear body 88 shown in
Like the implants 10 previously described, the implants 86 shown in
In the many catheter-based implantation techniques described above, the catheter used to place a given prosthesis in contact with tissue is usually manipulated to be detached from the prosthesis prior to the placement of fasteners. If desired, the catheter and prosthesis can remain coupled together during the fastening procedure. In this way, control of the prosthesis can be maintained up to and during the fastening procedure.
Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. The specification and examples should be considered exemplary and merely descriptive of key technical; features and principles, and are not meant to be limiting. The true scope and spirit of the invention are defined by the following claims. As will be easily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, variations and modifications of each of the disclosed embodiments can be easily made within the scope of this invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/365,056, filed on Mar. 1, 2006 now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/808,216, filed Mar. 24, 2004 now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/307,226 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,570), filed on Nov. 29, 2002. U.S. application Ser. No. 10/808,216 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/271,334 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,960,217), filed on Oct. 15, 2002, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/333,937, filed Nov. 28, 2001. The contents of all these disclosures are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2033039 | Limpert | Mar 1936 | A |
3499222 | Linkow et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3686740 | Shiley | Aug 1972 | A |
3799172 | Szpur | Mar 1974 | A |
4140126 | Choudhury | Feb 1979 | A |
4255820 | Rothermel et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4307722 | Evans | Dec 1981 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4586923 | Gould et al. | May 1986 | A |
4625597 | Cast | Dec 1986 | A |
4694827 | Weiner et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4781682 | Patel | Nov 1988 | A |
4822345 | Danforth | Apr 1989 | A |
4898577 | Badger et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4899747 | Garren et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4990151 | Wallsten | Feb 1991 | A |
4994071 | MacGregor | Feb 1991 | A |
5030204 | Badger et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5042707 | Taheri | Aug 1991 | A |
5044519 | Aoyama | Sep 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5104399 | Lazarus | Apr 1992 | A |
5185004 | Lashinski et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192314 | Daskalakis | Mar 1993 | A |
5195968 | Lundquist et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199950 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207695 | Trout, III | May 1993 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5318525 | West et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320630 | Ahmed | Jun 1994 | A |
5330490 | Wilk et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330503 | Yoon | Jul 1994 | A |
5334196 | Scott et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352197 | Hammersmark et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364351 | Heinzelman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383880 | Hooven et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
5409498 | Braddock et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5456714 | Owen | Oct 1995 | A |
5470337 | Moss | Nov 1995 | A |
5474568 | Scott et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480382 | Hammerslag et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489295 | Piplani et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522881 | Lentz | Jun 1996 | A |
5531686 | Lundquist et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534007 | St. Germain et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571171 | Barone et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571173 | Parodi | Nov 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609627 | Goicoechea et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5626613 | Schmieding | May 1997 | A |
5628788 | Pinchuk | May 1997 | A |
5632772 | Alcime et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639278 | Dereume et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5662675 | Polanskyj Stockert et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5662700 | Lazarus | Sep 1997 | A |
5676696 | Marcade | Oct 1997 | A |
5676697 | Mcdonald | Oct 1997 | A |
5683450 | Goicoechea et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693084 | Chuter | Dec 1997 | A |
5693086 | Goicoechea et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700269 | Pinchuk et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702343 | Alferness | Dec 1997 | A |
5702365 | King | Dec 1997 | A |
5702408 | Wales et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707376 | Kavteladze et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713907 | Hogendijk et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733325 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749921 | Lenker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755777 | Chuter | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769884 | Solovay | Jun 1998 | A |
5776142 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
5782844 | Yoon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797933 | Snow et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800528 | Lederman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810882 | Bolduc et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814016 | Valley | Sep 1998 | A |
5824008 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824037 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830221 | Stein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830229 | Konya et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843160 | Rhodes | Dec 1998 | A |
5855565 | Bar-Cohen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855598 | Pinchuk | Jan 1999 | A |
5861003 | Latson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865791 | Whayne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876432 | Lau et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904713 | Leschinsky | May 1999 | A |
5906619 | Olson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906641 | Thompson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916263 | Goicoechea et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5944750 | Tanner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957940 | Tanner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964772 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968053 | Revelas | Oct 1999 | A |
5972003 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972023 | Tanner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980548 | Evans et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993401 | Inbe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993466 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
5997556 | Tanner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016810 | Ravenscroft | Jan 2000 | A |
6024703 | Zanelli et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024763 | Lenker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027462 | Greene et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6070589 | Keith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074418 | Buchanan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077214 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090137 | Schmitt | Jul 2000 | A |
6123722 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145509 | Tanner | Nov 2000 | A |
6146339 | Biagtan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152144 | Lesh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162168 | Schweich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168610 | Marin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174323 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179809 | Khairkhahan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197049 | Shaolian et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203550 | Olson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203568 | Lombardi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206827 | Chin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217597 | Tanner | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224540 | Lederman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231561 | Frazier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248118 | Tanner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250974 | Kerek | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258021 | Wilk | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258119 | Hussein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270516 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273858 | Fox et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286514 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287315 | Wijeratne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287335 | Drasler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293906 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296656 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319278 | Quinn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336933 | Parodi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343605 | Lafontaine | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346118 | Baker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352561 | Leopold et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371919 | Tanner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398803 | Layne et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402680 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6402780 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6406420 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409757 | Trout, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416365 | Iwahori | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416522 | Strecker | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423059 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425856 | Shapland et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428565 | Wisselink | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454796 | Barkman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458152 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461365 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468260 | Bumbalough et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482224 | Michler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520974 | Tannerq et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6544253 | Tanner | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558425 | Rockwood, Jr. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562051 | Bolduc et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565597 | Fearnot et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576009 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580417 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592593 | Parodi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592615 | Marcade et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595912 | Lau et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607555 | Patterson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616684 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6639278 | Sumida et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652555 | Van Tassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652572 | Kugler et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663558 | Lau et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675809 | Stack et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685620 | Gifford et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702763 | Murphy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702844 | Lazarus | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709442 | Miller et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719174 | Swift | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730119 | Smalling et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6746460 | Gannoe et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800081 | Parodi | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6878164 | Kujawski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6929661 | Bolduc et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960217 | Bolduc | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984241 | Lubbers et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986775 | Morales et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986784 | Weiser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7033384 | Gannoe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037343 | Imran | May 2006 | B2 |
7060021 | Wilk | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7060023 | French et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081086 | Lau et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081129 | Chobotov | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7128754 | Bolduc | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147657 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155295 | Lau et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7179225 | Shluzas et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7306623 | Watson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335213 | Hyde et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7361137 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7422558 | Lau et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7491232 | Bolduc et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7544198 | Parodi | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7563267 | Goldfarb et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7591842 | Parodi | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637932 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7704269 | St. Goar et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727189 | Van Tassel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753922 | Starksen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7811295 | Kortenbach | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823267 | Bolduc et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828267 | Iwabuchi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828838 | Bolduc et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7959663 | Bolduc | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959670 | Bolduc | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8075570 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8080050 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083752 | Bolduc | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092519 | Bolduc | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8231639 | Bolduc et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8685044 | Bolduc et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8690897 | Bolduc | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010041821 | Wilk | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020026144 | Patterson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029077 | Leopold et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058855 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065485 | Dubois | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087169 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099432 | Yee | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133054 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156365 | Tsekos | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156521 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183827 | Derus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018358 | Saadat | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030060674 | Gifford et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078465 | Pai et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100943 | Bolduc | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105384 | Sharkey et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105519 | Fasol et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130731 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149463 | Solymar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158570 | Ferrazzi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163085 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030233140 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002731 | Aganon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039405 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044364 | DeVries et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049207 | Goldfarb et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054352 | Adams et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093057 | Bolduc et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127916 | Bolduc et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138734 | Chobotov et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153143 | Quiachon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186566 | Hindrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206363 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243170 | Suresh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254594 | Alfaro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260322 | Rudko et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260383 | Stelter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038506 | Webler et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043790 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070992 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113906 | Bolduc et al. | May 2005 | A9 |
20050154401 | Weldon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177180 | Kaganov | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187613 | Bolduc et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197716 | Sharkey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215874 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240258 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240260 | Bolduc | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060100640 | Bolduc | May 2006 | A1 |
20060184224 | Angel | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060253186 | Bates | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259125 | Peacock, III | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287661 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021753 | Bolduc et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021829 | Bolduc | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032860 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073389 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083255 | Chiang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080065117 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065189 | Bolduc | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097489 | Goldfarb et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080132996 | Drasler et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090082852 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099650 | Bolduc et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112302 | Stafford | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112303 | Bolduc | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138072 | Gendreau | May 2009 | A1 |
20100094400 | Bolduc et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110087320 | Bolduc et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110276062 | Bolduc | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120065661 | Bolduc | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120316578 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140194902 | Bolduc et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214051 | Bolduc | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002353807 | Jun 2003 | AU |
2004277897 | Apr 2005 | AU |
2008243229 | Dec 2008 | AU |
2006305688 | Dec 2012 | AU |
2011253682 | Jan 2014 | AU |
2011224089 | Jul 2014 | AU |
2265131 | Sep 1999 | CA |
2344252 | Mar 2000 | CA |
2729464 | Jun 2003 | CA |
2539265 | May 2005 | CA |
2626505 | Apr 2007 | CA |
2626106 | May 2007 | CA |
2625082 | Jul 2008 | CA |
2740831 | Apr 2010 | CA |
2464048 | Jun 2010 | CA |
2464900 | Apr 2011 | CA |
2554022 | Nov 2012 | CA |
1019461 | Dec 1992 | CN |
1422139 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1596087 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1596088 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1856280 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1870949 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1997318 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101267788 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101330882 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101352375 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101360466 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101460104 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101466316 | Jun 2009 | CN |
100525719 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101330882 | Apr 2011 | CN |
101466316 | Jun 2012 | CN |
3333427 | May 1991 | DE |
69228184 | Sep 1999 | DE |
10034105 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10297483 | Dec 2004 | DE |
0321912 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0663184 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0835642 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1369098 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1440673 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1448117 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1675528 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1725172 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1734872 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1948080 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2349086 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2299548 | Aug 1976 | FR |
2865926 | Aug 2005 | FR |
2396824 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2417208 | Feb 2006 | GB |
1073240 | Aug 2009 | HK |
2001509398 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001522292 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001526574 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002526193 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2005046648 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005510293 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005510303 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007508894 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007535339 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009512497 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009512498 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009512499 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009078172 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009106768 | May 2009 | JP |
2009106775 | May 2009 | JP |
2009112827 | May 2009 | JP |
2009519046 | May 2009 | JP |
4405262 | Jan 2010 | JP |
10506026 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010051786 | Mar 2010 | JP |
4465359 | May 2010 | JP |
2011062570 | Mar 2011 | JP |
4699445 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO-9300868 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-9521592 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9603925 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO-9703616 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9712562 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9717039 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9717913 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9811814 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9853761 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9933402 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9933402 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-9953845 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-0064357 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0016701 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO-0035350 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0160432 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-03032870 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03045467 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03045467 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03045283 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-03079935 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004008975 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004021872 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2005032333 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005037076 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005044073 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005044147 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005044148 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005067660 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2005081936 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005102181 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2005032333 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2005067660 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007046953 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007046954 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007046955 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007047023 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007053233 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007046953 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007046955 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007047023 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2005081936 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007053233 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2007046954 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2005044073 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2010004856 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010044851 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010044854 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010044855 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010044856 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 23, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/365,056, filed Mar. 1, 2006, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed on Dec. 9, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/365,056, filed Mar. 1, 2006, 10 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Aug. 30, 2005, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005453, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, published on Nov. 3, 2005, as WO 2005/102181, one page. |
Written Opinion mailed on Aug. 30, 2005, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005453, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, published on Nov. 3, 2005, as WO 2005/102181, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Examination Report mailed on Mar. 13, 2006, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/005453, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, published on Nov. 3, 2005, as WO 2005/102181, 3 pages. |
“5mm Origin Tracker It Runs in Circles Around Staples”, Guidant Origin Advertising Literature, (1995), 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Feb. 11, 2005”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Non Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2004”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 11, 2005”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 17, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 26, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Response filed Mar. 15, 2004 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 23, 2003”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Response filed Nov. 22, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2004”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 23, 2003”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/271,334, Supplemental Response filed Jan. 28, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2004”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, 312 Amendment filed Oct. 24, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Appeal Brief filed Oct. 14, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2006”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 22, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 22, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, PTO Response to 312 Amendment mailed Nov. 10, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Response filed Apr. 9, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2006”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Response filed Jun. 23, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Response filed Sep. 15, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,226, Response filed Dec. 14, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2006”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 8, 2008”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Preliminary Amendment May 6, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Response filed Mar. 11, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Response filed May 15, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2006”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Response filed Sep. 7, 2007 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2007”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Response filed Oct. 2, 2006 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 27, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Restriction Requirement Jul. 27, 2006”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/669,881, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,282, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2005”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,282, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 13, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,282, Response filed Feb. 22, 2005 to Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 17, 2004”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,282, Response filed Feb. 28, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2005”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,282, Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 17, 2004”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,255, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Feb. 17, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,255, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 9, 2004”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,255, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 9, 2005”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 8, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,435, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2006”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Applicant's Summary of Examiner Interview filed Jun. 6, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 2, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Mar. 3, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 26, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 14, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 16, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Response filed Jan. 25, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Response filed Apr. 9, 2007 to Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 8, 2006”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Response filed Apr. 26, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Response filed Jul. 22, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Response filed Sep. 19, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 24, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 24, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 8, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Supplemental Amendment filed Mar. 18, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,465, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed May 8, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/808,216, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 15, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, 312 Amendment filed Nov. 23, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Non Final Office Action mailed May 5, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 6, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 23, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 2, 2006”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, PTO Response to 312 Communication mailed Dec. 13, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Response filed Jan. 12, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 15, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Response filed Jun. 7, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Response filed Nov. 9, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 5, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 15, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,411, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 30, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,428, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 12, 2009”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,428, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,428, Non Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,428, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2009”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 9, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 5, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 29, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 20, 2005”. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 15, 2005”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Response filed Dec. 18, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,444, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2010”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed Apr. 1, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed Apr. 20, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed Aug. 3, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed Dec. 29, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 22, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 18, 2005”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Response filed Jan. 5, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 9, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Response filed Oct. 5, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,950, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 9, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Non Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 10, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 18, 2005”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Response filed May 20, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 18, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Response filed Nov. 17, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 24, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/255,116, Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 18, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/365,056, Response filed Sep. 28, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/365,056, Response filed Dec. 10, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 10, 2009”, 44 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/365,056, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 10, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 31, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Feb. 1, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Feb. 13, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Apr. 26, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 31, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed May 3, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Jul. 2, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 5, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Oct. 13, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 5, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Appeal Brief filed Aug. 26, 2010”, 26 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 11, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 29, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 3, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,427, Response filed Apr. 10, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,428, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,428, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,428, Response filed May 12, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,428, Response filed Oct. 1, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 29, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/540,428, Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 29, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Appeal Brief filed Nov. 15, 2010”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 22, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2009”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 4, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Response filed Jul. 22, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 22, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/580,584, Response filed Oct. 20, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 22, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Non Final Office Action mailed May 20, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 31, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Response filed May 10, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 6, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Response filed Jun. 22, 2011 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 22, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Response filed Nov. 5, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 20, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,752, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 6, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,753, Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,753, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,753, Response filed Mar. 3, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,112, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 29, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,112, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Non Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Mar. 25, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Apr. 4, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 4, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Oct. 10, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 4, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,032, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 4, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Response filed May 1, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 3, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Response filed Dec. 21, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 3, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,045, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 16, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 12, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 10, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Response filed Apr. 6, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Response filed Aug. 27, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/653,219, Non Final Office Action mailed May 30, 2012”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Notice of Allowance mailed May 20, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 27, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Response filed Apr. 15, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Response filed Oct. 15, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 16, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Response filed Jun. 27, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 13, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Response filed Mar. 25, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2002351188, Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2002351188, Office Action mailed Dec. 8, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2002353807, First Examiner Report mailed Nov. 16, 2006”, 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2004277897, First Examiner Report mailed Oct. 14, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2004277897, Response filed Jul. 14, 2011 to First Examiner Report mailed Oct. 14, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2004287354, Office Action mailed Oct. 13, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2005235108, Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006302908, Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006305688, First Examiner Report mailed Mar. 10, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006305688, Response filed Oct. 22, 2012 to First Examiner Report mailed Mar. 10, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006305689, Office Action mailed Sep. 5, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006309241, Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2008243229, First Examiner Report mailed Apr. 13, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2008243229, Response filed May 13, 2011 to Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011224089, First Examiners Report mailed Mar. 27, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011253682, Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011253682, Response filed Jul. 17, 2013 to Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2012”, 19 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,464,900, Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,539,585, Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,539,585, Office Action mailed Sep. 19, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,546,681, Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,554,022, Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,554,022, Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,558,317, Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,558,317, Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,626,403, Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2006”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Office Action mailed Aug. 8, 2007”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2006”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Response filed Jan. 31, 2007 to Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2006”, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Response filed Apr. 7, 2006 to Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2006”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Response filed May 19, 2008 to Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 38 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 02823581.9, Response filed Dec. 3, 2007 to Office Action mailed Aug. 8, 2007”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480027649.7, Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2008”, w/English translation, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480027649.7, Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2009”, w/English translation, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480027649.7, Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2010”, w/English translation, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480027649.7, Response filed Jan. 19, 2010 to Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480027649.7, Response filed Mar. 8, 2011 to Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2010”, w/English translation, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Response filed Feb. 25, 2011 to Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Response filed May 22, 2009 to Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480031226.2, Response filed Jul. 12, 2010 to Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2010”, Chinese only, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580006169.7, Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2010”, w/English translation, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580006169.7, Response filed Jul. 14, 2010 to Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2010”, w/English translation, 32 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580009570.6, Office Action mailed May 9, 2008”. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200580009570.6, Response filed Nov. 21, 2008 to Office Action mailed May 9, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680034052.4, Office Action mailed May 11, 2010”, w/English translation, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680034052.4, Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2009”, w/English translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680034052.4, Response filed Mar. 1, 2010 to Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680034052.4, Response filed Sep. 26, 2010 to Office Action mailed May 11, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680038882.4, Office Action mailed May 11, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680046854.7, Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680046854.7, Response filed Sep. 26, 2010 to Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680047552.1, Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200680047552.1, Response filed Dec. 20, 2010 to Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200810210922.X, Office Action mailed Jan. 19, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200810210922.X, Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200810210922.X, Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200810210922.X, Response filed Jun. 1, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jan. 19, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200810210922.X, Response filed Aug. 12, 2010 to Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200910139527.1, Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2010”, w/English translation, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200910139527.1, Response filed Nov. 28, 2011 to Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, European Search Report mailed Aug. 14, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Response filed Jan. 18, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011”, 19 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Response filed Feb. 16, 2012 to Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Response filed Apr. 5, 2012 to Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 02789196.9, Response filed Oct. 25, 2010 to Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 04788653.6, Office Action mailed May 19, 2006”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05713941.2, Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2007”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802573.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 15, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802573.3, Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802573.3, Office Action mailed May 28, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802573.3, Response filed Sep. 3, 2012 to Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2012”, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802578.2, European Search Report mailed Mar. 7, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802580.8, Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09820886.1, Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 09820886.1, Response filed Dec. 8, 2011 to Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 10297483.7, Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2006”, 4 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 10297483.7, Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2006”, 2 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 10297483.7, Office Action mailed and Response filed Oct. 30, 2006”, 8 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 10297483.7, Response filed Jul. 7, 2006 to Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2006”, 14 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 10297483.7, Response filed Oct. 26, 2006 to Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0411107.6, Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0411107.6, Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2005”, 1 pg. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0411107.6, Response filed Aug. 23, 2005 to Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0411107.6, Response filed Oct. 31, 2005 to Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2005”, 4 pgs. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0522152.8, Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2005”, 5 pgs. |
“Great Britain Application Serial No. 0522152.8, Response filed Apr. 26, 2006 to Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2005”, 48 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/032753, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Aug. 16, 2004”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/032753, International Search Report mailed Mar. 6, 2003”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/032753, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 26, 2003”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/038365, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 6, 2004”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/038365, International Search Report mailed May 8, 2003”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2002/038365, Written Opinion mailed Oct. 27, 2003”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027589, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 6, 2005”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027589, International Search Report mailed Apr. 6, 2005”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027589, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 6, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027590, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Feb. 16, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027590, International Search Report mailed Jan. 12, 2005”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/027590, Written Opinion mailed Jan. 12, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/029402, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jul. 10, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/029402, International Search Report mailed Feb. 24, 2006”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/029402, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 24, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/00059, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 18, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/00059, International Search Report mailed Jan. 5, 2007”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/00059, Written Opinion mailed Jan. 5, 2007”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005453, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 16, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005453, International Search Report mailed Aug. 30, 2005”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005453, International Written Opinion mailed Aug. 30, 2005”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005627, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Apr. 7, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005627, International Search Report mailed Sep. 25, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/005627, Written Opinion mailed Sep. 25, 2007”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033741, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jul. 28, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033741, International Search Report mailed Mar. 30, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033741, Written Opinion mailed Mar. 30, 2007”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033747, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 1, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033747, International Search Report mailed Jul. 8, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033747, Written Opinion mailed Jul. 8, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033748, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 18, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033748, International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033748, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 15, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033749, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 18, 2008”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033749, International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/033749, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 15, 2007”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/037085, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jul. 24, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/037085, International Search Report mailed Aug. 30, 2007”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/037085, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 30, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005604, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 13, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005604, International Search Report mailed Dec. 11, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005604, Written Opinion mailed Dec. 11, 2009”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005607, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 9, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005607, International Search Report mailed Dec. 11, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005607, Written Opinion mailed Dec. 11, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005608, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 14, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005608, International Search Report mailed Dec. 10, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005608, Written Opinion mailed Dec. 10, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005609, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 9, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005609, International Search Report mailed Dec. 18, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2009/005609, Written Opinion mailed Dec. 18, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-546789, Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2009”, w/English translation, 7 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-546789, Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2008”, w/English translation, 6 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-546789, Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-546789, Response filed May 21, 2009 to Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2003-546789, Response filed Dec. 11, 2008 to Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2008”, w/English translation, 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-528036, Office Action mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-528036, Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2009”, w/English translation, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-528036, Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2008”, w/English translation, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-528036, Response filed Dec. 25, 2008 to Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2008”, w/English translation, 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-536616, Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2006-536616, Response filed Dec. 19, 2008 to Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007500928, Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2010”, w/English translation, 10 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007504965, Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2012”, w/English translation, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007504965, Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2011”, w/English translation, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007504965, Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2010”, English translation, 1 pg. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2007504965, Response filed Mar. 11, 2011 to Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-316282, Office Action mailed May 16, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-316296, Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2011”, 2 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-316296, Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-323279, Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2010”, 1 pg. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-323290, Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-323290, Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-323290, Response filed Dec. 7, 2011 to Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536574, Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, English only, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536574, Office Action mailed Oct. 3, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536575, Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536576, Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536577, Notice of Allowance mailed May 30, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536577, Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2011”, w/English translation, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-536577, Response filed Jan. 6, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“Laparoscopic Surgery”, Medical Data International, Inc. MedPro, (1995), 190. |
Bolduc, Lee, “Devices, Systems, and Methods for Prosthesis Delivery and Implantation, Including the Use of a Fastener Tool”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, filed Nov. 2, 2010, 120 pgs. |
Gadacz, T., et al., “The Spiral Tracker: A New Technique for Stabilizing Prosthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair”, Surgical Rounds, (Nov. 1995), 461-467. |
Hatchett, R. L, et al., “Extraperitoneal Endoscopic Burch Repair Using a Tacker Mesh Technique”, (1995), 1-4. |
Newman, L., et al., “Tacker-Assisted TAPP Procedure”, (1995), 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Nov. 15, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Response filed Dec. 27, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,842, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 2, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,232, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,232, Response filed Jan. 9, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 15, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Response filed Oct. 18, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 27, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 4, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/495,836, Response filed Nov. 5, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06802580.8, Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 24, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Advisory Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Response filed Feb. 4, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Response filed Mar. 28, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,626,403, Response filed Feb. 12, 2014 to Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2013”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed May 6, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Response filed Apr. 29, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 7, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Non Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Jun. 5, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Non Final Office Action mailed May 8, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,034, Response filed Aug. 1, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 8, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/315,015, Response filed Jun. 17, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,232, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 7, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,232, Final Office Action mailed May 22, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/942,232, Response filed Jul. 21, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed May 22, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,384, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,683, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 24, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011224089, Response filed Mar. 21, 2014 to First Examiners Report mailed Mar. 27, 2013”, 74 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05713941.2, European Search Report mailed Apr. 10, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05713941.2, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Jun. 5, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 24, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Sep. 18, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,619, Response filed Sep. 15, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2014”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/488,305, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/288,031, Response filed Sep. 10, 2014 to Advisory Action mailed Jul. 7, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 05723408.0, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Jul. 10, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110238088 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60333937 | Nov 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11365056 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 13157242 | US | |
Parent | 10808216 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11365056 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10307226 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10808216 | US | |
Parent | 10271334 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10307226 | US |