NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
Movement disorders are neurological conditions that affect the ability to produce and control body movement. In particular, such disorders interfere with the speed, fluency, quality, and ease of movement. And, in some cases, cognitive and autonomic functions can be affected. Currently it is estimated that over 40 million individuals suffer from some sort of movement disorders. They can occur in all age groups from infancy to the elderly.
Treatment for movement disorders depends on the underlying cause. In most cases, the goal of treatment is to relieve symptoms. Treatment may include medication, botulinum toxin injection therapy, and surgery. Medications that are typically used include the following: antiepileptics, antiseizure medications, beta-blockers, dopamine agonists, and tranquilizers. However, these medications have a variety of side effects. Side effects of antiepileptics include dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting. Antiseizure medications may cause a lack of coordination and balance (ataxia), dizziness, nausea, and fatigue. Side effects caused by beta-blockers include slowed heart rate (bradycardia), depression, light-headedness, and nausea. Dopamine agonists may cause nausea, headache, dizziness, and fatigue. Tranquilizers such as benzodiazepines may cause blood clots (thrombosis), drowsiness, and fatigue.
Botulinum toxin injection therapy is used to treat some types of movement disorders (e.g., spasmodic torticollis, blepharospasm, myoclonus, tremor). In this treatment, a potent neurotoxin (produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum) is injected into a muscle to inhibit the release of neurotransmitters that cause muscle contraction. In some cases, treatment is repeated every 3 to 4 months. However, patients may develop antibodies to the toxin over time, causing treatment to become ineffective. Side effects include temporary weakness in the group of muscles being treated, unintentional paralysis of muscles other than those being treated and rarely, flu-like symptoms.
When medication is ineffective, severe movement disorders may require surgery. In such instances, deep brain stimulation may be performed wherein a surgically implanted neurostimulator is used to deliver electrical stimulation to areas of the brain that control movement. The electrical charge blocks nerve signals that trigger abnormal movement. In deep brain stimulation, a lead is inserted through a small incision in the skull and is implanted in the targeted area of the brain. An insulated wire is then passed under the skin in the head, neck, and shoulder, connecting the lead to the neurostimulator, which is surgically implanted in the chest or upper abdomen. However, negative side effects of deep brain stimulation can occur, including: bleeding at the implantation site, depression, impaired muscle tone, infection, loss of balance, slight paralysis (paresis), slurred speech (dysarthia), and tingling (parethesia) in the head or the hands.
Another type of surgical treatment for motion disorders is ablative surgery. Ablative surgery locates, targets, and then destroys (ablates) a defined area of the brain that produces chemical or electrical impulses that cause abnormal movements. In this surgery, a heated probe or electrode is inserted into the targeted area. The patient remains awake during the procedure to determine if the problem has been eliminated. A local anesthetic is used to dull the outer part of the brain and skull. The brain is insensitive to pain, so the patient does not feel the actual procedure. However, in some cases, it may be difficult to estimate how much tissue to destroy and the amount of heat to use. This type of surgery involves either ablation in the part of the brain called the globus pallidus (called pallidotomy) or ablation of brain tissue in the thalamus (called thalamotomy). Pallidotomy may be used to eliminate uncontrolled dyskinesia (e.g., jerky, involuntary movements) and thalamotomy may be performed to eliminate tremor. A related procedure, cryothalamotomy, uses a supercooled probe that is inserted into the thalamus to freeze and destroy areas that produce tremors.
Aside from the risks and side effects associated with the above described therapies, such treatments are not always effective in treating the movement disorder. Therefore, improved therapies with higher effectiveness and lower side effects are desired. At least some of these objectives will be met by the following invention.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method is provided treating a patient having a movement disorder. In some embodiments, the method comprises presenting the patient having the movement disorder, positioning a lead having at least one electrode within the patient so that the at least one electrode is disposed near a target dorsal root ganglion associated with the movement disorder, and providing stimulation energy to the at least one electrode so as to selectively stimulate at least a portion of the target dorsal root ganglion so as to reduce a symptom of the movement disorder while providing no or imperceptible amounts of stimulation energy directly to a ventral root. In some embodiments, the movement disorder includes Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis or a Demylenating Movement Disorder. In other embodiments, the movement disorder includes Cerebral Palsy, Chorea, Dystonia, Spasm, Tic disorder or Tremor. It may be appreciated that other movement disorders may also be treated with the methods and devices of the present invention.
In some embodiments, the target dorsal root ganglion is associated with a reflex arc and providing stimulation energy comprises activating the reflex arc. In some instances, activating the reflex arc comprises stimulating at least one sensory neuron so as to activate at least one soma of an alpha motor neuron. In some embodiments, the at least one sensory neuron comprises an Ia sensory fiber. In other embodiments, the at least one sensory neuron comprises an Ib sensory fiber.
In some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises providing a stimulation signal having at least one parameter selected to selectively stimulate the at least a portion of the target dorsal root ganglion so as to reduce a symptom of the movement disorder. In some instances, the at least one parameter comprises frequency. Optionally, the at least one parameter comprises frequency having a value of less than or equal to approximately 100 Hz.
In some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises choosing size of the at least one electrode, shape of the at least one electrode, and/or position of the at least one electrode so as to selectively stimulate the at least a portion of the target dorsal root ganglion so as to reduce the symptom of the movement disorder.
In some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises providing stimulation energy in response to at least one sensor configured to sense an indicator of the movement disorder. In some instances, the indicator comprises an onset of the symptom of the movement disorder, and the stimulation signal is provided to reduce or avoid the onset of the symptom. In some instances, the indicator comprises a status of the symptom of the movement disorder, and the stimulation signal is provided to treat the symptom in real time.
In some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises providing stimulation energy in response to at least one sensor configured to sense an activity or an activity level of the patient.
In some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises providing stimulation energy in response to at least one sensor configured to detect a position of at least a portion of a body of the patient.
In second aspect of the invention, a method is provided of treating a movement disorder of a patient comprising advancing a sheath having a curved distal end along an epidural space of the patient, positioning the curved distal end so as to direct a lead advanced therethrough toward a spinal nerve associated with the disorder, advancing the lead having at least one electrode through the sheath so that the at least one electrode is disposed near the spinal nerve, and providing stimulation energy to the at least one electrode so as to stimulate at least a portion of the spinal nerve in a manner which reduces a symptom of the movement disorder. In some instances, the movement disorder includes Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis or a Demylenating Movement Disorder. In other instances, the movement disorder includes Cerebral Palsy, Chorea, Dystonia, Spasm, Tic disorder or Tremor. It may be appreciated that other movement disorders may also be treated with the methods and devices of the present invention.
In some embodiments, the at least a portion of the spinal nerve comprises at least a portion of a dorsal root ganglion associated with the movement disorder. And, in some embodiments, providing stimulation energy comprises adjusting at least one signal parameter to reduce the symptom of the movement disorder. In some instances, adjusting the at least one signal parameter comprises adjusting a frequency of the stimulation energy. For example, adjusting a frequency of the stimulation energy may comprise selecting a frequency less than or equal to approximately 100 Hz. Or, adjusting a frequency of the stimulation energy may comprise selecting a frequency less than or equal to approximately 50 Hz.
In a third aspect of the invention, a stimulation system is provided for treating a patient having a movement disorder. In some embodiments, the system comprises a lead having at least one electrode, wherein the lead is configured for implantation so as to position at least one of the at least one electrode adjacent a dorsal root ganglion associated with the movement disorder, and a pulse generator electrically connected to the at least one of the at least one electrode, wherein the pulse generator provides a signal to the at least one of the at least one electrode which stimulates at least a portion of the dorsal root ganglion so as to reduce a symptom of the movement disorder.
In some embodiments, the target dorsal root ganglion is associated with a reflex arc and the signal is configured to activate the reflex arc. In some instances, activation of the reflex arc comprises stimulation of at least one sensory neuron so as to activate at least one soma of an alpha motor neuron. In some instances, the at least one sensory neuron comprises an Ia sensory fiber. In other instances, the at least one sensory neuron comprises an Ib sensory fiber.
In some embodiments, the at least of the at least one electrode has a size that selectively stimulates the at least one sensory neuron. In some embodiments, the at least of the at least one electrode has a shape that selectively stimulates the at least one sensory neuron.
In some embodiments, the signal has at least one parameter that is programmable to selectively stimulate the at least one sensory neuron. In some instances, the at least one parameter comprises frequency. In some instances, the frequency is programmable with a value up to approximately 100 Hz. In other instances, the frequency is programmable with a value up to approximately 50 Hz.
In some embodiments the stimulation system further comprises at least one sensor configured to sense an indicator of the movement disorder. In some embodiments, the at least one sensor comprises an accelerometer, a strain gauge, or an electrical device which measures electrical activity in a muscle or nerve. In some embodiments, the indicator indicates an onset of the symptom of the movement disorder, and the stimulation signal is provided to reduce or avoid the onset of the symptom. In some embodiments, the indicator indicates a status of the symptom of the movement disorder, and the stimulation signal is provided to treat the symptom in real time. In some embodiments, the indicator indicates a position of at least a portion of a body of the patient.
In some embodiments, the stimulation system further comprises at least one sensor configured to sense an activity or an activity level of the patient.
In a fourth aspect of the invention, a system is provided for treating a patient having a movement disorder, the system comprising a lead having at least one electrode, wherein the lead is configured to be positioned so that at least one of the at least one electrodes is able to stimulate at least a portion of a target dorsal root associated with the movement disorder, at least one sensor configured to sense a symptom of the movement disorder, and an implantable pulse generator connectable with the lead, wherein the generator includes electronic circuitry configured to receive information from the at least one sensor and provide a stimulation signal to the lead in response to the sensed symptom of the movement disorder, wherein the stimulation signal has an energy below an energy threshold for stimulating a ventral root associated with the target dorsal root while the lead is so positioned.
In some embodiments, the at least one sensor senses an onset of the symptom of the movement disorder, and the stimulation signal is provided to reduce or avoid the onset of the symptom.
In some embodiments, the at least one sensor senses a status of the symptom of the movement disorder, and wherein the stimulation signal is provided to treat the symptom in real time.
In some embodiments, the at least one sensor senses an activity or an activity level of the patient.
In some embodiments, the at least one sensor detects a position of at least a portion of a body of the patient.
In some embodiments, the at least one sensor comprises an accelerometer, a strain gauge, or an electrical device which measures electrical activity in a muscle or nerve.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description to follow, together with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides devices, systems and methods for the targeted treatment of movement disorders. Such movement disorders include, among others,
1) Akathisia
2) Akinesia (lack of movement)
3) Associated Movements (Mirror Movements or Homolateral Synkinesis)
4) Athetosis (contorted torsion or twisting)
5) Ataxia
6) Ballismus (violent involuntary rapid and irregular movements) and Hemiballismus (affecting only one side of the body)
7) Bradykinesia (slow movement)
8) Cerebral palsy
9) Chorea (rapid, involuntary movement), including Sydenham's chorea, Rheumatic chorea and Huntington's disease
10) Dystonia (sustained torsion), including Dystonia muscularum, Blepharospasm, Writer's cramp, Spasmodic torticollis (twisting of head and neck), and Dopamine-responsive dystonia (hereditary progressive dystonia with diurnal fluctuation or Segawa's disease)
11) Geniospasm (episodic involuntary up and down movements of the chin and lower lip)
12) Myoclonus (brief, involuntary twitching of a muscle or a group of muscles)
13) Metabolic General Unwellness Movement Syndrome (MGUMS)
14) Multiple Sclerosis
15) Parkinson's disease
16) Restless Legs Syndrome RLS (WittMaack-Ekboms disease)
17) Spasms (contractions)
18) Stereotypic movement disorder
19) Stereotypy (repetition)
20) Tardive dyskinesia
21) Tic disorders (involuntary, compulsive, repetitive, stereotyped), including Tourette's syndrome
22) Tremor (oscillations)
23) Rest tremor (approximately 4-8 Hz)
24) Postural tremor
25) Kinetic tremor
26) Essential tremor (approximately 6-8 Hz variable amplitude)
27) Cerebellar tremor (approximately 6-8 Hz variable amplitude)
28) Parkinsonian tremors (approximately 4-8 Hz variable amplitude)
29) Physiological tremor (approximately 10-12 Hz low amplitude)
30) Wilson's disease
The present invention provides for targeted treatment of such conditions with minimal deleterious side effects, such as undesired motor responses or undesired stimulation of unaffected body regions. This is achieved by directly neuromodulating a target anatomy associated with the condition while minimizing or excluding undesired neuromodulation of other anatomies. In most embodiments, neuromodulation comprises stimulation, however it may be appreciated that neuromodulation may include a variety of forms of altering or modulating nerve activity by delivering electrical and/or pharmaceutical agents directly to a target area. For illustrative purposes, descriptions herein will be provided in terms of stimulation and stimulation parameters, however, it may be appreciated that such descriptions are not so limited and may include any form of neuromodulation and neuromodulation parameters.
Typically, the systems and devices are used to stimulate portions of neural tissue of the central nervous system, wherein the central nervous system includes the spinal cord and the pairs of nerves along the spinal cord which are known as spinal nerves. The spinal nerves include both dorsal and ventral roots which fuse to create a mixed nerve which is part of the peripheral nervous system. At least one dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is disposed along each dorsal root prior to the point of mixing. Thus, the neural tissue of the central nervous system is considered to include the dorsal root ganglions and exclude the portion of the nervous system beyond the dorsal root ganglions, such as the mixed nerves of the peripheral nervous system. Typically, the systems and devices of the present invention are used to stimulate one or more dorsal root ganglia, dorsal roots, dorsal root entry zones, or portions thereof, while minimizing or excluding undesired stimulation of other tissues, such as surrounding or nearby tissues, ventral root and portions of the anatomy associated with body regions which are not targeted for treatment. However, it may be appreciated that stimulation of other tissues are contemplated.
The target stimulation areas of the present invention, particularly the dorsal root ganglia, are utilized due to their specialized role in movement. It is in these areas that sensory fibers are isolated from motor fibers. Sensory fibers are involved in a variety of reflexes that are involved in movement control, and these reflexes can be utilized in the treatment of various movement disorders. Thus, by stimulating sensory fibers in these areas, fundamental reflexes can be affected to lessen the symptoms of movement disorders. In addition, such targeted stimulation reduces undesired side effects, such as painful tingling or unwanted movements caused by direct stimulation of motor nerves, such as within the ventral root.
A variety of motor reflexes are involved in movement control. A reflex or reflex arc is the neural pathway that mediates a reflex action. A motor reflex action occurs relatively quickly by activating motor neurons in the spinal cord without the delay of routing signals through the brain. Normally, messages from nerve cells in the brain (upper motor neurons) are transmitted to nerve cells in the brain stem and spinal cord (lower motor neurons) and from there to particular muscles. Thus, upper motor neurons direct the lower motor neurons to produce movements such as walking or chewing. Lower motor neurons control movement in the arms, legs, chest, face, throat, and tongue. However, lower motor neurons can be accessed via a reflex arc to circumvent the involvement of upper neurons. This is beneficial when responding to a harmful stimulus, such as a hot surface, wherein speed is critical. And, this is beneficial when there is damage or disease affecting upper neurons resulting in a movement disorder.
The present invention utilizes such reflex arcs to treat patients presenting with one or more movement disorders.
Referring again to
The implantable stimulation system 100 can be used to stimulate a variety of anatomical locations within a patient's body. In preferred embodiments, the system 100 is used to stimulate one or more dorsal roots, particularly one or more dorsal root ganglions.
In some instances, such electrodes 106 may provide a stimulation region indicated by dashed line 110, wherein the DRG receives stimulation energy within the stimulation region and the ventral root VR does not as it is outside of the stimulation region. Thus, such placement of the lead 104 may assist in reducing any possible stimulation of the ventral root VR due to distance. However, it may be appreciated that the electrodes 106 may be positioned in a variety of locations in relation to the DRG and may selectively stimulate the DRG due to factors other than or in addition to distance, such as due to stimulation profile shape and stimulation signal parameters, to name a few. It may also be appreciated that the target DRG may be approached by other methods, such as a retrograde epidural approach. Likewise, the DRG may be approached from outside of the spinal column wherein the lead 104 is advanced from a peripheral direction toward the spinal column, optionally passes through or partially through a foramen and is implanted so that at least some of the electrodes 106 are positioned on, about or in proximity to the DRG.
In order to position the lead 104 in such close proximity to the DRG, the lead 104 is appropriately sized and configured to maneuver through the anatomy. In some embodiments, such maneuvering includes atraumatic epidural advancement along the spinal cord S, through a sharp curve toward a DRG, and optionally through a foramen wherein the distal end of the lead 104 is configured to then reside in close proximity to a small target such as the DRG. Consequently, the lead 104 is significantly smaller and more easily maneuverable than conventional spinal cord stimulator leads. Example leads and delivery systems for delivering the leads to a target such as the DRG are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/687,737, entitled “Stimulation Leads, Delivery Systems and Methods of Use”, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. In one embodiment, an introducing needle is used to access the epidural space of the spinal cord S. The needle has a hollow shaft and typically has a very slightly curved distal end. The shaft is sized to allow passage of the lead, sheath and stylet therethrough. In some embodiments, the needle is 14 gauge which is typically the size of epidural needles used to place conventional percutaneous leads within the epidural space. However, it may be appreciated that other sized needles may also be used, particularly smaller needles such as 15-18 gauge. Alternatively, non-standardized sized needles may be used.
In many movement disorders, improper action potentials are generated, either from damage to the upper motor neurons or from other causes. In some instances, such improper action potentials cause muscles (such as muscle MD and synergistic muscles (such as M2) to undesirably contract while causing antagonistic muscles (such as muscle M3) to undesirably relax. In some embodiments, treatment of such a condition is achieved by providing selective stimulation to the dorsal root and/or DRG associated with the muscles M1, M2, M3, with the use of an appropriately positioned lead 104, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, selective stimulation of the involved sensory neuron SN is achieved with the choice of the size of the electrode(s), the shape of the electrode(s), the position of the electrode(s), the stimulation signal, pattern or algorithm, or any combination of these. Such selective stimulation stimulates the targeted neural tissue while excluding untargeted tissue, such as surrounding or nearby tissue. In some embodiments, the stimulation energy is delivered to the targeted neural tissue so that the energy dissipates or attenuates beyond the targeted tissue or region to a level insufficient to stimulate modulate or influence such untargeted tissue. In particular, selective stimulation of tissues, such as the dorsal root, DRG, or portions thereof, exclude stimulation of the ventral root wherein the stimulation signal has an energy below an energy threshold for stimulating a ventral root associated with the target dorsal root while the lead is so positioned. Examples of methods and devices to achieve such selective stimulation of the dorsal root and/or DRG are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/607,009, entitled “Selective Stimulation Systems and Signal Parameters for Medical Conditions”, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. It may be appreciated that indiscriminant stimulation of the ventral root, such as from an electrode which emits stimulation energy which directly stimulates the ventral root, typically causes unpleasant sensations for the patient, such as tingling, buzzing or undesired motions or movements. Therefore, it is desired to stimulate motor neurons M1, M2 and/or M3 via synapses in the spinal cord rather than directly via the ventral root.
It may be appreciated that even though the motor neurons are stimulated via synapses in the spinal cord, such stimulation is differentiated from stimulating the spinal cord directly to affect motor neurons. The spinal cord is a highly innervated portion of the anatomy; sensory information from receptors throughout most of the body is relayed to the brain by means of ascending tracts of fibers that conduct impulses up the spinal cord, and, the brain directs motor activities in the form of nerve impulses that travel down the spinal cord in descending tracts of fibers. The white matter of the spinal cord is composed of ascending and descending fiber tracts. These are arranged into six columns of white matter called funiculi. The ascending fiber tracts convey sensory information from cutaneous receptors, proprioceptors (muscle and joint senses), and visceral receptors. The descending fiber tracts convey motor information, and there are two major groups of descending tracts from the brain: the corticospinal, or pyramidal tracts, and the extrapyramidal tracts.
From 80%-90% of the corticospinal fibers decussate in the pyramids of the medulla oblongata (hence the name “pyramidal tracts”) and descend in the lateral corticospinal tracts, which decussate in the spinal cord. Because of the crossing of fibers, the right cerebral hemisphere controls the musculature on the left side of the body, where the left hemisphere controls the right musculature. The corticospinal tracts are primarily concerned with the control of fine movement that requires dexterity.
Given the high number of fiber tracts within the spinal cord and the extensive crossing of fibers, direct stimulation of the spinal cord typically yields highly variable and/or non-specific generalized results. Slight changes in position of the stimulation electrodes on the spinal cord causes stimulation of different tracts which can easily lead to undesired side effects. For example, given that both sensory and motor information is conveyed within the spinal cord, attempts at stimulating the motor fiber tract often causes inadvertent stimulation of the sensory fiber tract. Likewise, given the interconnectivity of pathways across various spinal levels within the spinal cord, targeting of a particular spinal level or a particular pair of opposing muscle groups is very difficult when applying stimulation to the spinal cord. Further, a higher frequency signal and a higher level of power is also typically required in attempts to reach specific nerve types with stimulation when directly stimulating the spinal cord.
By stimulating the motor neurons in the spinal cord via the dorsal root ganglion, the drawbacks associated with direct stimulation of the spinal cord are avoided. In particular, since the dorsal root ganglion houses primarily sensory neurons, rather than mixed neurons such as in the spinal cord or peripheral nerves, inadvertent stimulation of unrelated or undesired anatomies is obviated. In addition, stimulation of a single dorsal root ganglion only affects muscles that are innervated with motor nerves that synapse with that dorsal root ganglion. Consequently, a single muscle, a single muscle group, pair of opposing muscles or muscle groups or a particular localized area may be precisely targeted by stimulating a corresponding dorsal root ganglion. Such specificity and targeting is beneficial for treating localized spasticity or other such movement disorders, among other conditions. Further, stimulation of a dorsal root ganglion requires less power than comparative stimulation on the spinal cord. And, stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion involves a lower frequency than comparative stimulation of the spinal cord. In some embodiments, a low frequency signal is used, particularly a frequency less than or equal to approximately 100 Hz, more particularly less than or equal to approximately 80 Hz, and more particularly 4-80 Hz. In some embodiments, the signal has a frequency of approximately less than or equal to 70 Hz, 60 Hz, 50 Hz, 40 Hz, 30 Hz, 20 Hz, 10 Hz, or 5 Hz. It may be appreciated that typically the desired frequency used to treat a movement disorder varies from patient to patient. For example, in one patient a symptom of a movement disorder is reduced with the use of a stimulation signal having a given frequency, such as 100 Hz, by stimulating a particular dorsal root ganglion. And, in another patient having the same or similar movement disorder, a symptom of the movement disorder is reduced with the use of a stimulation signal having a different frequency, such as 50 Hz, by stimulating a corresponding particular dorsal root ganglion. Such variations may be due to slight differences in anatomy between the patients and differences in disease pathology, to name a few. However, it may be appreciated that the frequency is typically in the low frequency range.
In other instances, improper action potentials due to movement disorders cause muscles (such as muscle M1) and synergistic muscles (such as M2) to undesirably relax while causing antagonistic muscles (such as muscle M3) to undesirably contract. In some embodiments, treatment of such a condition is achieved by providing selective stimulation to the dorsal root and/or DRG associated with the muscles M1, M2, M3, with the use of an appropriately positioned lead 104, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the implantable pulse generator (IPG) 102 comprises circuitry which initiates or modifies the electrical stimulation in response to one or more sensors. Example sensors include, among others, accelerometers, strain gauges, electrical devices which measure electrical activity in muscles and/or nerves, or other devices capable of measuring physiological parameters indicative of symptoms of the movement disorder under treatment. In some embodiments, the one or more sensors sense the onset of symptoms of the movement disorder, transmitting such information to the electronic circuitry 107 of the IPG 102 so that electrical stimulation is provided to the patient to counteract, reduce and/or avoid the onset of symptoms of the movement disorder. For example, in patients suffering from tremors, such tremors may be sudden in onset and remission. Some have increased incidence with stress or decreased incidence when the patient is distracted. This is particularly the case with psychogenic tremors. In such patients, the tremor activity may be sensed with a sensor, such as on a bracelet or anklet worn on the affected limb or limbs. The sensor may sense a change in acceleration of the limb, frequency of movement of the limb, position of the limb, or a combination of these, to name a few. It may be appreciated that such sensors may also be used on other affected areas of the body, such as the head, neck, shoulder, torso, etc. When the tremor activity is sensed as increased, such as an onset or increase in activity, the electrical stimulation is changed to inhibit or diminish the increase in tremor activity. This may be achieved by increasing or decreasing one or more signal parameters, such as amplitude, frequency, pulse width or a combination of these. Likewise, it may be appreciated that when the tremor activity is sensed as decreased, such as a remission or decrease in activity, the electrical stimulation may be changed, such as to more appropriately match the stimulation to the tremor activity. In other instances, stimulation may be changed during remission or decrease in tremor activity to conserve power, prolong battery life, or reduce any side effects or symptoms related to unnecessary or undesired stimulation, to name a few. It may be appreciated that tremor has been used merely as an example and other movement disorders or symptoms related to movement disorders may be similarly sensed. For example, some patients with movement disorders experience jerks or twitches in some part of the body. These jerky movements may be triggered by pain, certain lighting, or even loud noises. The occurrence of these symptoms may be sensed and counteracted in a manner as described above.
In some embodiments, the one or more sensors sense the status of the symptoms of the movement disorder, such as the extent of contraction or limb movement. Such status information is utilized to modify the electrical stimulation to a level which is appropriate to counteract or treat the symptoms of the movement disorder in real time. For example, patients suffering from spasticity have altered skeletal muscle performance in muscle tone involving hypertonia. It is often referred to as an unusual tightness, stiffness, and/or pull of muscles. Spasticity is found in conditions where the brain and/or spinal cord are damaged or fail to develop normally; these include cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury and acquired brain injury including stroke. In some instances, the level of spasticity may increase or decrease, such as over time or with stimulation. In some embodiments, the status of the symptom, such as spasticity, is sensed to determine if a change has occurred. When the symptom is sensed as changed, the electrical stimulation is changed to inhibit or diminish the change in symptom. This may be achieved by increasing or decreasing one or more signal parameters, such as amplitude, frequency, pulse width or a combination of these. Again, it may be appreciated that spasticity has been used merely as an example and other movement disorders or symptoms related to movement disorders may be similarly sensed.
In other embodiments, the one or more sensors sense a specific activity or an activity level of the patient. Some movement disorders are correlated to certain activities, such as walking. For example, functional movement disorders often cause problems in coordinated locomotion or walking. These problems could involve dragging one foot or difficulty balancing while walking. An activity or activity level sensor may be used to detect the type of activity (such as walking) and/or amount or degree of activity (such as slow walk or fast walk). The sensed information could be an input to dynamically modify the stimulation program to determine the appropriate level of stimulation. Alternatively or additionally, different pre-programmed stimulation algorithms may be designed for an individual patient based on that specific patient's pattern of activity. Pre-programmed stimulation algorithms may be stored in an appropriate medium for use by a stimulation system described herein. Conventional transcutaneous programming techniques may also be used to update, modify or remove stimulation algorithms.
In other embodiments, the one or more sensors comprise a position sensor which may be used to detect position of the patient. The position of the patient could be an input to the stimulation control system to dynamically modify the stimulation program to determine the appropriate level of stimulation. One example of such a sensor is a multi-axis accelerometer. A conventional 3 or 4 axis accelerometer could be implanted into a patient or maintained on the patient to provide position, activity, activity level, activity duration or other indications of patient status. The detected indications of patient status could in turn be used in determining stimulation level and pattern. The position sensor can be set up or calibrated once positioned or implanted on or in a person. The calibration aids the sensor in correctly recognizing the persons orientation and activity levels.
In some embodiments, the sensor senses when a patient has lowered to laying or sleeping position. Since most movement disorders rarely occur during sleep, stimulation may be reduced or ceased during sleep to reduce power consumption and extend battery life.
In some embodiments, the sensor senses when a patient has risen to a standing position and stimulation is provided to counteract a symptom of a movement disorder related to standing. For example, orthostatic tremor is characterized by fast (>12 Hz) rhythmic muscle contractions that occur in the legs and trunk immediately after standing. Cramps are felt in the thighs and legs and the patient may shake uncontrollably when asked to stand in one spot. No other clinical signs or symptoms are present and the shaking ceases when the patient sits or is lifted off the ground. The high frequency of the tremor often makes the tremor look like rippling of leg muscles while standing. In such patients, stimulation is provided upon sensing of standing wherein the patient immediately feels relief of such symptoms. When the patient moves to a different position, such as sitting, the stimulation is ceased or reduced to a desired level.
In some embodiments, the sensor senses a particular movement pattern and stimulation is provided to counteract a symptom of a movement disorder related to that particular movement pattern. For example, cerebellar tremor is a slow, broad tremor of the extremities that occurs at the end of a purposeful movement, such as trying to press a button or touching a finger to the tip of one's nose. When such a movement patterns is sensed, stimulation is then provided to counteract the symptom of the movement disorder that follows. Cerebellar tremor is caused by lesions in or damage to the cerebellum resulting from stroke, tumor, or disease such as multiple sclerosis or some inherited degenerative disorder. It can also result from chronic alcoholism or overuse of some medicines. In classic cerebellar tremor, a lesion on one side of the brain produces a tremor in that same side of the body that worsens with directed movement. Cerebellar damage can also produce a “wing-beating” type of tremor called rubral or Holmes' tremor—a combination of rest, action, and postural tremors. The tremor is often most prominent when the affected person is active or is maintaining a particular posture. Thus, a variety of sensors may be used in a complex array of decision making processes as to when and how stimulation is provided or changed for a particular patient.
Optionally, a position sensor is located within the same physical housing as the IPG 102. If desired, the position sensor may be located elsewhere on the body in an implanted location or may be worn externally by the person. Position information from the position and/or activity sensor is provided to the IPG 102 using suitable means including direct connections or percutaneous transmission. Although a number of embodiments are suitable, the preferred mode employs, by way of example and not to be construed as limiting of the present invention, one or more accelerometers to determine patient state including, at least, the ability to sense whether the person is erect or recumbent. Additionally, the position sensor could be adapted to provide an indication of activity or level of activity such as the difference between walking and running. In another embodiment, a position sensor may be positioned to sense specific motion such as activity of a particular part of the body to detect specific movement of a body part or limb that, for example, is being treated for a movement disorder. Using this position sensor embodiment, when the person started activity related to a movement disorder, the sensor would detect such activity and provide the appropriate stimulation. In additional alternatives, the position and/or activity sensor includes one or more multi-axis accelerometers.
In some embodiments, the implantable pulse generator (IPG) 102 comprises circuitry which initiates or modifies the electrical stimulation in response to a timer or clock. Thus, stimulation may be reduced or eliminated during times in which the patient is sleeping or times in which it is determined that the patient desires reduced or no treatment of the movement disorder. Such periods of reduced usage may extend the life of the power supply 110.
As mentioned previously, it may be appreciated that neuromodulation may include a variety of forms of altering or modulating nerve activity by delivering electrical and/or pharmaceutical agents directly to a target area. For illustrative purposes, descriptions herein were provided in terms of stimulation and stimulation parameters, however, it may be appreciated that such descriptions are not so limited and may include any form of neuromodulation and neuromodulation parameters, particularly delivery of agents to the dorsal root ganglion. Methods, devices and agents for such delivery are further described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/309,429 entitled, “Directed Delivery of Agents to Neural Anatomy”, incorporated herein by reference.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example, for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious that various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used and the above description should not be taken as limiting in scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/607,009 filed on Oct. 27, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,056,197 and this application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/438,895 filed on Feb. 2, 2011, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
525891 | Fricke | Sep 1894 | A |
3724467 | Avery et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3845770 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4141367 | Ferreira | Feb 1979 | A |
4232679 | Schulman | Nov 1980 | A |
4298003 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4313448 | Stokes | Feb 1982 | A |
4374527 | Iversen | Feb 1983 | A |
4479491 | Martin | Oct 1984 | A |
4549556 | Tarjan et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4573481 | Bullara | Mar 1986 | A |
4577642 | Stokes | Mar 1986 | A |
4590946 | Loeb | May 1986 | A |
4607639 | Tanagho et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4739764 | Lue et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4786155 | Fantone et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4803988 | Thomson | Feb 1989 | A |
4920979 | Bullara | May 1990 | A |
4940065 | Tanagho et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950270 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5135525 | Biscoping et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5270099 | Kamiyama et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5299569 | Wernicke et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5344438 | Testerman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370644 | Langberg | Dec 1994 | A |
5411537 | Munshi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5411540 | Edell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417719 | Hull et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419763 | Hildebrand | May 1995 | A |
5458626 | Krause | Oct 1995 | A |
5489294 | McVenes et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505201 | Grill et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514175 | Kim et al. | May 1996 | A |
5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5634462 | Tyler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643330 | Holsheimer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5702429 | King | Dec 1997 | A |
5711316 | Elsberry et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713922 | King | Feb 1998 | A |
5733322 | Starkebaum | Mar 1998 | A |
5741319 | Woloszko et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755750 | Petruska et al. | May 1998 | A |
5776170 | MacDonald et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807339 | Bostrom et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824021 | Rise | Oct 1998 | A |
5865843 | Baudino | Feb 1999 | A |
5871531 | Struble | Feb 1999 | A |
5885290 | Guerrero et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5938690 | Law et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948007 | Starkebaum et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957965 | Moumane et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984896 | Boyd | Nov 1999 | A |
6002964 | Feler et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044297 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045532 | Eggers et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051017 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6104957 | Alo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120467 | Schallhorn | Sep 2000 | A |
6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175764 | Loeb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181965 | Loeb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185455 | Loeb et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205359 | Boveja | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208902 | Boveja | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214016 | Williams et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259952 | Sluijter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6298256 | Meyer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314325 | Fitz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319241 | King et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349233 | Adams | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353762 | Baudino et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356786 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360750 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366814 | Boveja et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393325 | Mann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425887 | McGuckin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438423 | Rezai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440090 | Schallhorn | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466821 | Pianca et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493588 | Malaney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510347 | Borkan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512958 | Swoyer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516227 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517542 | Papay et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535767 | Kronberg | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6582441 | He et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587725 | Durand et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605094 | Mann et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606521 | Paspa et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611715 | Boveja | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625496 | Ollivier | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638276 | Sharkey et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6658302 | Kuzma et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6714822 | King et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6748276 | Daignault, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754539 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6788975 | Whitehurst et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792318 | Chitre et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6832115 | Borkan | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835194 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839588 | Rudy | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6849075 | Bertolero et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862479 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871099 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873342 | Perry et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889094 | Kuzma et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901287 | Davis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902547 | Aves et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909917 | Woods et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6928320 | King | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6971391 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978180 | Tadlock | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7047082 | Schrom et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7096070 | Jenkins et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7127287 | Duncan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181289 | Pflueger et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7333857 | Campbell | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337005 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337006 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7447546 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7450993 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7502651 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7580753 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
8082039 | Kim et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010003799 | Boveja | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010006967 | Crain et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020064841 | Klemic et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077684 | Clemens et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087113 | Hartlaub | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099430 | Verness | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116030 | Rezai | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128694 | Holsheimer | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147486 | Soukup et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198527 | Muckter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018367 | Dilorenzo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023241 | Drewry et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045919 | Swoyer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069569 | Burdette et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078633 | Firlik et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088301 | King | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100933 | Ayal et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114905 | Kuzma | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130577 | Purdy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144657 | Bowe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144709 | Zabara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181958 | Dobak, III | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187490 | Gliner | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195602 | Boling | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220677 | Doan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015202 | Chandler et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019359 | Worley et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019369 | Duncan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059404 | Bjorklund et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040116977 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122360 | Waldhauser et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122477 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122497 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122498 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147992 | Bluger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210290 | Omar-Pasha | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215286 | Stypulkowski | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230273 | Cates et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230280 | Cates et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243210 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027338 | Hill | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033295 | Wisnewski | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033393 | Daglow | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038489 | Grill | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070982 | Heruth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080325 | Erickson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090885 | Harris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096718 | Gerber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050149154 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154437 | Williams | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159799 | Daglow et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203599 | Garabedian et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222647 | Wahlstrand et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251237 | Kuzma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004364 | Green et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009820 | Royle | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041295 | Osypka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052828 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052836 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052856 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064150 | Heist et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089609 | Bleich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089696 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094976 | Bleich | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095088 | DeRidder | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155344 | Rezai et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161235 | King | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167525 | King | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195169 | Gross et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200121 | Mowery | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206118 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241716 | Finch et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247750 | Seifert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070043400 | Donders et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060954 | Cameron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123954 | Gielen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179579 | Feler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213671 | Hiatt | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255366 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270928 | Erlebacher | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276319 | Betts | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080009927 | Vilims | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033431 | Jung et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039916 | Colliou et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080103572 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103579 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103580 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119711 | Nikumb et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140152 | Imran et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140153 | Burdulis | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140169 | Imran | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147156 | Imran | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154349 | Rossing et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167698 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183221 | Burdulis | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183257 | Imran et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188916 | Jones et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090204173 | Fang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210041 | Kim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248095 | Schleicher et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270960 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090299444 | Boling | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100121408 | Imran et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137938 | Kishawi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179562 | Linker et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191307 | Fang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249875 | Kishawi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292769 | Brounstein et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110184486 | De Ridder | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110257693 | Burdulis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276056 | Grigsby et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120197370 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120310140 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130345783 | Burdulis | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140200625 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150165193 | Imran | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2401143 | Oct 2000 | CN |
101594907 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101678204 | Mar 2010 | CN |
0779080 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1304135 | Apr 2003 | EP |
2756864 | Jul 2014 | EP |
03041191 | Jun 1991 | JP |
H06-218064 | Aug 1994 | JP |
8500996 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8080353 | Mar 1996 | JP |
10243954 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2004512105 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2006523215 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005516697 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006508768 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008526299 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009539425 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009539426 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 02096512 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03018113 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03043690 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03063692 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03066154 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03084433 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03090599 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2005092432 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006033039 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006084635 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2008070809 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009134350 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010062622 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010132816 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kramer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,697 entitled “Selective stimulation to modulate the sympathetic nervous system,” filed Apr. 27, 2012. |
Kim et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,439 entitled “Methods for Stimulating a Dorsal Root Ganglion,” filed Jul. 16, 2012. |
Wedley et al. Handbook of Clinical Techniques in the Management of Chronic Pain. Taylor & Francis; pp. 17-19. Nov. 27, 1996. |
Kim et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,100 entitled “Neurostimulation Methods and Systems,” filed Dec. 5, 2012. |
Kishawi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,326 entitled “Pain management with stimulation subthreshold to parasthesia,” filed Jan. 29, 2013. |
Abdulla et al.; Axotomy- and autotomy-induced changes in the excitability of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons; J Neurophysiol; 85(2); pp. 630-643; Feb. 2001. |
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. (ANSI) Research Briefing dated Aug. 20, 2004 by Stephens Inc. Investment Bankers pp. 1-4. |
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. (ANSI) Research Bulletin dated Jul. 2, 2004 by Stephens Inc. Investment Bankers pp. 1-7. |
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. (ANSI) Research Bulletin dated Jul. 27, 2004 by Stephens Inc. Investment Bankers pp. 1-9. |
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. Equity Research dated Jan. 16, 2003 by Pacific Growth Equities pp. 1-8. |
Alo, Kenneth M. New Trends in Neuromodulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain. Neurosurgery. Apr. 2002. 50 (4): 690-703. |
Aoki, Yasuchika et al. Distribution and Immunocytochemical Characterization of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Innervating the Lumbar Intervertebral Disc in Rats: A Review. Life Sciences. Apr. 2004. 74 (21): 2627-2642. |
Askar, Zahid, et al. Scott Wiring for Direct Repair of Lumbar Spondylolysis. Spine. Feb. 2003. 28 (4): 354-357. |
Baba, Hiroshi et al. Peripheral Inflammation Facilitates A? Fiber-Mediated Synaptic Input to the Substantia Gelatinosa of the Adult Rat Spinal Cord. The Journal of Neuroscience. Jan. 1999. 19 (2): 859-867. |
Bajwa, Zahid H. et al. Herpetic Neuralgia: Use of Combination Therapy for Pain Relief in Acute and Chronic Herpes Zoster. Geriatrics. Dec. 2001; 56 (12): 18-24. |
Barendse, G.A. et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Intradiscal Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: Lack of Effect From a 90-Second 70 C Lesion. Spine. 26 (3): 287-92. (Abstract Only). Feb. 1, 2001. |
Barlocher, C.B. et al. Kryorhizotomy: An Alternative Technique for Lumbar Medial Branch Rhizotomy in Lumber Facet Syndrome. J. Neurosurg. 98 (1): 14-20. (Abstract Only). Jan. 2003. |
Blau, A. et al. Characterization and Optimization of Microelectrode Arrays for In Vivo Nerve Signal Recording and Stimulation. Biosens Bioelectron. 12 (9-10): 883-92. (Abstract Only). Nov. 1997. |
Boston Scientific A Neuromodulation Primer dated Jun. 9, 2004 in Medical Supplies and Devices, published by Susquehanna Financial Group, LLLP pp. 1-17. |
Brammah, T.B. et al. . Syringomyelia as a Complication of Spinal Arachnoiditis. Spine. 19 (22): 2603-5. (Abstract Only). Nov. 15, 1994. |
Braverman D.L. et al. Using Gabapentin to Treat Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Caused by Epidural Fibrosis: A Report of 2 Cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82 (5): 691-3. (Abstract Only). May 2001. |
Burton et al.; The organization of the seventh lumbar spinal ganglion of the cat; J Comp Neurol.; 149(2); pp. 215-232; May 15, 1973. |
Carlton, Susan M. et al. Tonic Control of Peripheral Cutaneous Nociceptors by Somatostatin Receptors. Journal of Neuroscience. 21 (11): 4042-4049. Jun. 1, 2001. |
Chaplan, S.R. et al. Quantitative Assessment of Tactile Allodynia in the Rat Paw. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 53 (1): 55-63. Jul. 1994. |
Cho, J. Percutaneo Radiofrequency Lumbar Facet Rhizotomy in Mechanical Low Back Pain Syndrome. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 68 (1-4): 212-7. (Abstract Only). (month unavailable) 1997. |
Clark, Robert K. “Anatomy and physiology: understanding the human body”; Jones & Bartlett Publishers; Sudbury, MA; ISBN 0-7637-4816-6; Chapter 12; pp. 213-215; Feb. 28, 2005. |
Crampon, M.-A. et al. Nerve Cuff Electrode With Shape Memory Alloy Armature: Design and Fabrication. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering. 12 (4): 397-410. (month unavailable) 2002. |
Cuoco, Jr., Frank A. et al. Measurement of External Pressures Generated by Nerve Cuff Electrodes. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering. 8 (1): 35-41. Mar. 2000. |
Cyberonics, Inc. Equity Research dated Jan. 16, 2003 by Pacific Growth Equities pp. 1-14. |
Denny, N.M. et al. Evaluation of an Insulated Tuohy Needle System for the Placement of Interscalene Brachial Plex Catheters. Anaesthesia. 58 (6): 554-7. (Abstract Only). Jun. 2003. |
Dreyfuss, Paul et al. Efficacy and Validity of Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Chronic Lumbar Zygapophysial Joint Pain. Spine. 25 (10): 1270-1277. May 15, 2000. |
Dubuisson, D. Treatment of Occipital Neuralgia by Partial Posterior Rhizotomy at C1-3. J Neurosurg. 82 (4): 581-6. (Abstract Only). Apr. 1995. |
Eschenfelder, Sebastian et al. Dorsal Root Section Elicits Signs of Neuropathic Pain Rather than Reversing Them in Rats With L5 Spinal Nerve Injury. Pain. 87 (2): 213-219. Aug. 2000. |
Firth, Ava et al. Development of a Scale to Evaluate Postoperative Pain in Dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 214 (5): 651-659. Mar. 1, 1999. |
Garcia Cosamalon, P. J. et al. Dorsal Percutaneo Radiofrequency Rhizotomy Guided With CT Scan in Intercostal Neuralgias. Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 109 (3-4): 140-1. (month unavailable) 1991. |
Giorgi, C. et al. Surgical Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia and Pain From Cancer of the Nasopharynx. A 20-Year Experience. J Neurosurg. 61 (5): 952-5. (Abs. Only). Nov. 1984. |
Gocer, A.I. et al. Percutaneous Radiofrequency Rhizotomy of Lumbar Spinal Facets the Results of 46 cases. Neurosurg Rev. 20 (2): 114-6. (Abstract Only). (month unavailable) 1997. |
Haller, H. et al. Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Traumatic Central Cervical Cord Lesion with Gabapentin. Journal of Neural Transmission. 110 (9): 977-981. Sep. 2003. |
Herron, L.D. Selective Nerve Root Block in Patient Selection for Lumbar Surgery: Surgical Results. J Spinal Disord. 2 (2): 75-9. (Abstract Only). Jun. 1989. |
Higuchi, Yoshinori, et al. Exposure of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Rats to Pulsed Radiofrequency Currents Activates Dorsal Horn Lamina I and II Neurons. Neurosurgery. 50 (4): 850-856. Apr. 2002. |
Holsheimer, J. et al. Effects of Electrode Geometry and Combination on Nerve Fibre Selectivity in Spinal Cord Stimulation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 33 (5): 676-682. Sep. 1995. |
Igarashi, T. et al. Lysis of Adhesions and Epidural Injection of Steroid/Local Anaesthetic During Epiduroscopy Potentially Alleviate Low Back and Leg Pain in Elderly Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 93 (2): 181-7.Aug. 2004. |
Julius, David et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Nociception. Nature. 413 (6852): 203-210. Sep. 13, 2001. |
Kanpolat, Yucel et al. Percutaneo Controlled Radiofrequency Trigeminal Rhizotomy for the Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia: 25-Year Experience with 1600 Patients. Neurosurgery. 48 (3): 524-534. Mar 2001. |
Kapadia, N.P. et al. Gabapentin for Chronic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 81 (10): 1439-41. (Abstract Only). Oct. 2000. |
Kapoor, Vibhu et al. Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: Preoperative Assessment With CT-Guided Nerve Block Prior to Dorsal Cervical Rhizotomy. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 24 (10): 2105-10. Nov.-Dec. 2003. |
Karai, Laszlo et al. Deletion of Vanilloid Receptor 1-Expressing Primary Afferent Neurons for Pain Control. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 113 (9): 1344-1352. May 2004. |
Kline, David G. et al. Management and Results of Sciatic Nerve Injuries: a 24-Year Experience. Journal of Neurosurgery. 89 (1): 13-23. Jul. 1998. |
Kobayashi, Shigeru et al. Pathology of Lumbar Nerve Root Compression Part 1: Intraradicular Inflammatory Changes Induced by Mechanical Compression. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 22 (1): 170-179. Jan 2004. |
Kobayashi, Shigeru et al. Pathology of Lumbar Nerve Root Compression Part 2: Morphological and Immunohistochemical Changes of Dorsal Root Ganglion. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 22 (1): 180-188. Jan. 2004. |
Kocsis et al.; NR2B receptors are involved in the mediation of spinal segmental reflex potentials but not in the cumulative motoneuronal depolarization in vitro; Brain Research Bulletin, Elsevier Science Ltd.; vol. 64; No. 2; pp. 133-138; Aug. 30, 2004. |
Koszewski, W. et al. [The Drez Lesion as an Effective Treatment for Chronic Hypothetically Post-Herpetic Neuropathic Pain. Case Report and Review of Literature]. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 37 (4): 943-53. (Abstract Only). (month unavailable) 2003. |
Lawrence, Stephen M. et al. Long-Term Biocompatibility of Implanted Polymer-Based Intrafascicular Electrodes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Article first publ. online: 63 (5): 501-506. Jul. 31, 2002. |
Lee, In-Seop et al. Characterization of Iridium Film as a Stimulating Neural Electrode. Biomaterials. 23 (11): 2375-2380. Jun. 2002. |
Lew, Henry L. et al. Preganglionic Approach to Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83 (5): 378. May 2004. |
Lopez et al.; Excitatory and inhibitory effects of serotonin on spinal nociceptive reflexes are mediated by 5-HT2 and 5-HT1B receptors; (Database Biosis Biosciences information service, Philadelphia, PA, US, XP002567533, accession No. PREV200100573757); Abstract; (month unavailable) 2001. |
Ma et al.; Enhanced excitability of dissociated primary sensory neurons after chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion in the rat; Pain; 113(1-2); pp. 106-112; Jan. 2005. |
Maher, C.O. et al. Lateral Exit-Zone Stenosis and Lumbar Radiculopathy. J Neurosurg. 90 (1 Suppl): 52-8. Jan. 1999. (Abstract Only). |
Mailley, Sophie et al. Thin Film Platinum Cuff Electrodes for Neurostimulation: In Vitro Approach of Safe Neurostimulation Parameters. Bioelectrochemistry. 63(1-20: 359-364. Jun. 2004. |
Masini, Michelle et al. Activated Pyrolytic Carbon Tip Pacing Leads: An Alternative to Steroid-Eluting Pacing Leads? PACE. 19(11 Pt 2): 1832-1835. Nov. 1996. |
Medtronic, Inc. Equity Research dated Dec. 18, 2002 by Pacific Growth Equities pp. 1-20. |
Medtronic. Analysis of Sales/Earnings-F1Q05: Many Gives and Takes in the Quarter dated Aug. 20, 2004 by Morgan Stanley pp. 1-25. |
Methods of Placement of Neurostimulation Lead, Infusion, Catheter, and/or Sensor Via Peripheral Vasculature. From IP.com PriorArtDatabase—Apr. 10, 2003—#000012136 http://www.priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM/000012136. |
Modern Ideas: The Gate Control Theory of Chronic Pain. Spine-Health.com: Your Comprehensive Resource for Back Pain. http://www.spine-health.com/topics/cd/pain/chronic—pain—theories/chronic—pain—theory02.html (accessed Feb. 24, 2006); 2 pages. |
Mond, Harry G. et al. Implantable Transveno Pacing Leads: The Shape of Things to Come. PACE. 27: 887-893. Jun. 2004. |
Monti, Enrico. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Approach. Neuromodulation. 7 (3): 193. Jul. 2004. (Abstract Only). |
Myles et al.; Effects of different methods of peripheral nerve repair on the number and distribution of muscle afferent neurons in rat dorsal root ganglion; J Neurosurg; 77(3); pp. 457-462; Sep. 1992. |
Nannini et al.; Muscle recruitment with intrafascicular electrodes; IEEE Trans on Biomedical Engineering; vol. 38; No. 8; pp. 769-776; Aug. 1991. |
Naples, Gregory G. A Spiral Nerve Cuff Electrode for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 35 (11): 905-916. Nov. 1988. |
Narozny, Martin et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Blocks in the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Leg Pain. Swiss Med Wkly. 131(5-6): 75-80. Feb. 2001. |
Nashold, Blaine S. et al. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief Using a Multicontact Electrode System. Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery. 51 (6): 872-873. Dec. 1979. |
Nashold, Blaine S. et al. Long-Term Pain Control by Direct Peripheral-Nerve Stimulation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 64 (1): 1-10. Jan. 1982. |
Neumann, Simona et al. Regeneration of Sensory Axons Within the Injured Spinal Cord Induced by Intraganglionic cAMP Elevation. Neuron. 34 (6): 885-93. Jun. 13, 2002. |
Nielson, K.D. et al. Peripheral Nerve Injury From Implantation of Chronic Stimulating Electrodes for Pain Control. Surg Neurol. 5 (1): 51-3. (Abstract Only).Jan. 1976. |
North, Richard B. et al. Dorsal Root Ganglionectomy for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study. J Neurosurg. 74(2): 236-242. Feb. 1991. |
North, Richard B. et al. Chapter 123: Current Concepts in the Neurosurgical Management of Persistent Pain (pp. 1634-1637). Operative Neurosurgical Techniques 4th Edition (Henry H. Schmidek et al. eds.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. Publ. date: Aug. 18, 2000. |
Nygaard, Oystein P. et al. The Function of Sensory Nerve Fibers in Lumbar Radiculopathy: Use of Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Exploration of Different Populations of Nerve Fibers and Dermatomes. Spine. 23 (3): 348-352. Feb. 1, 1998. |
Obata, K. et al. Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase in the Dorsal Root Ganglion Following Inflammation Near the Nerve Cell Body. Neuroscience. 126 (4): 1011-1021. Accepted Apr. 22, 2004. |
Obata, Koichi, et al. Expression of Neurotrophic Factors in the Dorsal Root Ganglion in a Rat Model of Lumbar Disc Herniation. Pain. 99 (1-2): 121-132. Sep. 2002. |
Olby, Natasha J. et al. Development of a Functional Scoring System in Dogs With Acute Spinal Cord Injuries. Am J Vet Res. 62(10): 1624-1628. Oct. 2001. |
Parlier-Cuau, Caroline et al. Symptomatic Lumbar Facet Joint Synovial Cysts: Clinical Assessment of Facet Joint Steroid Injection After 1 and 6 Months and Long-Term Follow-Up in 30 Patients. Radiology. 210 (2): 509-513. Feb. 1999. |
Pedrolli, C. et al. [Dorsolumbar Arachnoid Cysts. A Case Report]. Recenti Prog Med. 81 (11): 699-701. Nov. 1990. (Abstract Only). |
Prats-Galino et al.; Representations of hindlimb digits in rat dorsal root ganglia; J Comp Neurol; 408(1); pp. 137-145; May 24, 1999. |
Rodriguez, Francisco J. et al. Polyimide Cuff Electrodes for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 98 (2): 105-118. Jun. 1, 2000. |
Rokugo, Tomoyuki et al. A Histochemical Study of Substance P in the Rat Spinal Cord: Effect of Transcutaneo Electrical Nerve Stimulation. J Nippon Med Sch. 69 (5): 428-433. Oct. 2002. |
Romero, E. et al. Neural Morphological Effects of Long-Term Implantation of the Self-Sizing Spiral Cuff Nerve Electrode. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 39 (1): 90-100. Jan. 2001. |
Rongstad, K. et al. Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia. Foot Ankle Int. 17 (7): 378-82. Jul. 1996. (Abstract Only). |
Ruetten, S. et al. Endoscopic Surgery of the Lumbar Epidural Space (Epiduroscopy): Results of Therapeutic Intervention in 93 Patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 46 (1): 1-4. Feb. 2003. (Abstract Only). |
Sairyo, K. et al. A New Endoscopic Technique to Decompress Lumbar Nerve Roots Affected by Spondylolysis. Technical Note. J Neurosurg. 98(3): 290-3. Apr. 2003. (Abstract Only). |
Salame, K. et al. Surgical Treatment of Spasticity by Selective Posterior Rhizotomy 30 Years Experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 5 (8): 543-6. Aug. 2003. (Abstract Only). |
Saris, S.C. et al. Sacrococcygeal Rhizotomy for Perineal Pain. Neurosurgery. 19 (5): 789-93. Nov. 1986. (Abstract Only). |
Sauvage, P.J. et al. Intraspinal Synovial Cysts of the Lumbar Spine: Imaging Findings and Treatment by Percutaneo Steroid Injection. Review of 13 Cases. [Kystes Synoviaux Intraspinaux Lombaires: Imagerie et Traitement Par Infiltration. A Propos De. (month unavail.) 2000. |
Schwartzman, Robert J. et al. Neuropathic Central Pain: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Treatment Options. Arch Neurol. 58 (10): 1547-1550. Oct. 2001. |
Sedan, R. et al. Therapeutic Electrical Neurostimulation. French Language Society of Neurosurgery—28th Annual Congress—Athens, May 29-30, 1978. Neurochirurgie. 24: 3-8, Suppl. 1 (in French with English Summary pp. 121-125.). |
Sheth, Rishi N. et al. Mechanical Hyperalgesia After an L5 Ventral Rhizotomy or an L5 Ganglionectomy in the Rat. Pain. 96: 63-72. Mar. 2002. |
Siddall, Philip J. et al. Persistent Pain as a Disease Entity: Implications for Clinical Management. Anesth Analg. 99: 510-20. Aug. 2004. |
Silvers, H.R. Lumbar Percutaneo Facet Rhizotomy. Spine. 15 (1): 36-40. Jan. 1990. (Abstract Only). |
Slappendel, R. et al. The efficacy of Radiofrequency Lesioning of the Cervical Spinal Dorsal Root Ganglion in a Double Blinded Randomized Study: No difference Between 40 Degrees C. and 67 Degrees C. Treatments. Pain. 73 (2): 159-63. Nov. 1997. (Abstract Only). |
Sluijter, Menno E. et al. The Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency Fields Applied to the Dorsal Root Ganglion—A Preliminary Report. The Pain Clinic. 11 (2): 109-117. (month unavailable) 1998. |
Smith, H.P. et al. Radiofrequency Neurolysis in a Clinical Model: Neuropathological Correlation. J Neurosurg. 55 (2): 246-53. Aug. 1981. (Abstract Only). |
Spaic, M. et al. Drez Surgery on Con Medullaris (After Failed Implantation of Vascular Omental Graft) for Treating Chronic Pain Due to Spine (Gunshot) Injuries. Acta Neurochir(Wein). 141(12): 1309-1312. (month unavailable) 1999. |
Spaic, M. et al. Microsurgical DREZotomy for Pain of Spinal Cord and Cauda Equina Injury Origin: Clinical Characteristics of Pain and Implications for Surgery in a Series of 26 Patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 144 (5): 453-462. May 2002. |
Stanton-Hicks, M. et al. Stimulation of the Central and Peripheral Nervo System for the Control of Pain. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 14 (1): 46-62. Jan. 1997. |
Steinbok, P. et al. Complications After Selective Posterior Rhizotomy for Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Neurosurg. 28 (6): 300-13. Jun. 1998. (Abstract Only). |
Stolker, Robert J. et al. The Treatment of Chronic Thoracic Segmental Pain by Radiofrequency Percutaneo Partial Rhizotomy. J Neurosurg. 80(6): 986-992. Jun. 1994. |
Strait, T.A. et al. Intraspinal Extradural Sensory Rhizotomy in Patients With Failure of Lumbar Disc Surgery. J Neurosurg. 54(2): 193-6. Feb. 1981. (Abstract Only). |
Taha, J.M. et al. Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Rhizotomy in the Treatment of Cluster Headache. Headache. 35 (4): 193-6. Apr. 1995. (Abstract Only). |
Taub, Arthur et al. Dorsal Root Ganglionectomy for Intractable Monoradicular Sciatica: A Series of 61 Patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 65 (1-4): 106-110. (month unavailable) 1995. |
Uematsu, Sumio. Chapter 106: Percutaneo Electrothermocoagulation of Spinal Nerve Trunk, Ganglion, and Rootlets (pp. 1207-1221). Operative Neurosurgical Techniques, Indications, Methods and Results 2nd edition. (Henry H. Schmidek et al. eds.). (month unavail.) 1988. |
Van Zundert, Jan et al. Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Pain Management: Looking for the Best Use of Electrical Current. World Institute of Pain. 5 (2): 74-76. Jun. 2005. |
Van De Kraats, Everine B. et al. Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance to Three-Dimensional Rotational X-Ray Registration of Vertebral Bodies for Image-Guided Spine Surgery. Spine. 29 (3): 293-297. Feb. 2004. |
Van Kleef, M. et al. Effects and Side Effects of a Percutaneo Thermal Lesion of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Patients with Cervical Pain Syndrome. Pain. 52 (1): 49-53. Jan. 1993. |
Van Kleef, M. et al. Radiofrequency Lesion Adjacent to the Dorsal Root Ganglion for Cervicobrachial Pain: A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Study. Neurosurgery. 38 (6): 1127-31. Jun. 1996. |
Van Kleef, Maarten et al. Chapter 160: Radiofrequency Lesions in the Treatment of Pain of Spinal Origin (pp. 1585-1599). Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 1st Edition. (Philip L. Gildenberg et al. eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill. (month unavailable) 1998. |
Van Zundert, J. et al. Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Current Adjacent to the Cervical Dorsal Root Ganglion of the Rat Induces Late Cellular Activity in the Dorsal Horn. Anesthesiology. 102 (1): 125-31. Jan. 2005. |
Vaughan, R. Percutaneous Radiofrequency Gangliotomy in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia and Other Facial Pain. Aust N Z J Surg. 45 (2): 203-7. May 1975. (Abstract Only). |
Viton, J.-M. et al. Short-Term Assessment of Periradicular Corticosteroid Injections in Lumbar Radiculopathy Associated With Disc Pathology. Neuroradiology. 40 (1): 59-62. Jan. 1998. |
Viton, J.M. et al. Short-Term Evaluation of Periradicular Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy Associated With Disc Disease. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 65 (3): 195-200. Mar. 1998. (Abstract Only). |
Wagner, A.L. et al. Selective Nerve Root Blocks. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 5 (4): 194-200. Dec. 2002. (Abstract Only). |
Waxman et al.; Sodium channels, excitability of primary sensory neurons, and the molecular basis of pain; Muscle Nerve; 22(9); pp. 1177-1187; Sep. 1999. |
Weiner, Richard L. The Future of Peripheral Nerve Neurostimulation. Neurological Research. 22 (3): 299-304. Apr. 2000. |
Weiner, Richard L. Peripheral Nerve Neurostimulation. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 14 (3): 401-408. Jul. 2003. |
Weinstein, James et al. The Pain of Discography. Spine. 13 (12):1344-8. Dec. 1988. |
Wessels et al.; A rostrocaudal somatotopic organization in the brachial dorsal root ganglia of neonatal rats; Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 95 Suppl; pp. S3-S11; (month unavailable) 1993. |
Wessels et al.; Evidence for a rostrocaudal organization in dorsal root ganglia during development as demonstrated by intra-uterine WGA-HRP injections into the hindlimb of rat fetuses; Brain Res Dev Brain Res; 54(2); pp. 273-281; Jul. 1, 1990. |
Wessels et al.; Somatotopic organization in the sensory innervation of the rat hindlimb during development, using half dorsal root ganglia as subsegmental units; Eur J Morphol; 28(2-4); pp. 394-403; (month unavailable) 1990. |
Wessels et al.; The rostrocaudal organization in the dorsal root ganglia of the rat: a consequence of plexus formation?; Anat Embryol (Berl); 190(1); pp. 1-11; Jul. 1994. |
Wetzel, F. Todd et al. Extradural Sensory Rhizotomy in the Management of Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study. Spine. 22 (19): 2283-2291. Oct. 1, 1997. |
Wetzel, F.T. Chronic Benign Cervical Pain Syndromes: Surgical Considerations. Spine. 17 (10 Suppl): S367-74. Oct. 1992. (Abstract Only). |
Wetzel, F.T. et al. The Treatment of Chronic Extremity Pain in Failed Lumbar Surgery. The Role of Lumber Sympathectomy. Spine. 17 (12): 2367-8. Dec. 1992. (Abstract Only). |
White, P.F. et al. The Use of a Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block After Surgery Involving the Foot and Ankle: Does It Improve the Quality of Recovery? Anesth Analg. 97 (5): 1303-9. Nov. 2003. (Abstract Only). |
Whitworth, Louis Anthony et al. Application of Spinal Ablative Techniques for the Treatment of Benign Chronic Painful Conditions. Spine. 27 (22): 2607-2612. Nov. 15, 2002. |
Wilkinson, H.A. et al. Sensory Ganglionectomy: Theory, Technical Aspects, and Clinical Experience. J Neurosurg. 95(1): 61-6. Jul. 2001. (Abstract Only). |
Wong, C.B. et al. Clinical Outcomes of Revision Lumbar Spinal Surgery: 124 Patient With a Minimum of Two Years of Follow-Up. Chang Gung Med J. 25 (3): 175-82. Mar. 2002. (Abstract Only). |
Wright, Robert E. et al. Neurostimulation of the L2 Dorsal Root Ganglion for Intractable Disc Pain: Description of a Novel Technique. Presented at the IFESS. (month unavailable) 1998. |
Wu, Gang et al. Early Onset of Spontaneous Activity in Uninjured C-Fiber Nociceptors After Injury to Neighboring Nerve Fibers. Journal of Neuroscience. 21 (8): RC140. Apr. 15, 2001. |
Yamashita, Toshihiko et al. A Quantitative Analysis of Sensory Function in Lumbar Radiculopathy Using Current Perception Threshold Testing. Spine. 27 (14): 1567-1570. Jul. 15, 2002. |
Yoshida, Hirotoshi et al. Lumbar Nerve Root Compression Caused by Lumbar Intraspinal Gas: Report of Three Cases. Spine. Feb. 1, 1997, vol. 22 (3): 348-351. |
Young, R.F. Chapter 161: Dorsal Rhizotomy and Dorsal Root Ganglionectomy (pp. 3442-3451). Neurological Surgery 4th Edition. Jan. 15, 1996. (Julian R. Youmans ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. |
CIPOLLA—The Cerebral Circulation,Chap. 3—Perivascular Innervation ; Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; San Rafael, Ca.; 1(1):pp. 3; Jan. 2009. |
Dorsal Root Ganglion; www.biology-online.org/dDorsal—root—ganglion; downloaded Nov. 5, 2013; 4 pgs. |
The Peripheral Nervous System; http://cnx.org/content/m44751/latest; downloaded Nov. 5, 2013; 7 pgs. |
Kramer; U.S. Appl. No. 14/362,543 entitled “Neuromodulation of subcellular structures within the dorsal root ganglion,” filed Jun. 3, 2014. |
Horsch, S. et al. Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease; Annals of Vascular Surgery; 8(5): 468-74. Sep. 1994. |
Mayfield Clinic for Brain & Spine; printed from http://www.mayfieldclinic.com/PE-AnatSpine.htm (last updated Jan. 2013); 7 pages. |
medicinenet.com; Definition of Lateral; printed from http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=6226 (on Jun. 4, 2014); 3 pages. |
Kishawi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/615,281 entitled “Pain management with stimulation subthreshold to paresthesia,” filed Feb. 5, 2015. |
Burdulis; U.S. Appl. No. 14/633,060 entitled “Hard tissue anchors and delivery devices,” filed Feb. 26, 2015. |
Imran et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,076 entitled “Sutureless lead retention features,” filed May 21, 2015. |
Kishawi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/726,359 entitled “Selective stimulation systems and signal parameters for medical conditions,” filed May 29, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120158094 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61438895 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12607009 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13365163 | US |