Traditional processes for converting alkanes to olefins or to oligomerize olefins involve complicated, multistep processes. Dehydrogenation typically occurs at very high reaction temperatures (for example, in the range of approximately 400-500° C.) and approximately atmospheric pressure while oligomerization occurs at low reaction temperatures (for example, less than approximately 200° C.) and high pressure (for example, up to approximately 1000 psig). Expensive chemical co-activators are also used to facilitate reactions over homogenous oligomerization catalysts. Thus, there remains a need for a less complicated dehydrogenation process.
An aspect of the present disclosure is a method including forming a mixed bed comprising a dehydrogenation catalyst and a coupling catalyst, and applying a feed stream to the mixed bed, in which the applying results in a molecular weight hydrocarbon. In some embodiments, the dehydrogenation catalyst includes at least one of Pt—Sn/Al2O3 or a zeolite material, in which the Pt—Sn/Al2O3 or the zeolite material is modified with at least one of vanadium (V), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), gallium (Ga), nickel (Ni), or platinum (Pt). In some embodiments, the dehydrogenation catalyst includes an amorphous silica-alumina material modified with at least one of V, Zn, Cu, Ga, Ni, or Pt. In some embodiments, the coupling catalyst includes a BEA zeolite. In some embodiments, the BEA zeolite has a silica-alumina ratio (SAR) in the range of 10 to 300. In some embodiments, the BEA zeolite has a silicoaluminophosphate zeotype (SAPO). In some embodiments, the BEA zeolite includes a mixed oxide of at least one of WO3—ZrO2, SiO2—AlO3, or phosphated—SiO2—AlO3. In some embodiments, the coupling catalyst includes a faujasite (FAU) zeolite. In some embodiments, the FAU zeolite has a silica-alumina ratio (SAR) in the range of 10 to 300. In some embodiments, the FAU zeolite has a silicoaluminophosphate zeotype (SAPO). In some embodiments, In some embodiments, the FAU zeolite includes a mixed oxide of at least one of WO3—ZrO2, SiO2—AlO3, or phosphated—SiO2—AlO3. In some embodiments, the feed stream includes at least one C4-C8 branched hydrocarbon. In some embodiments, the feed stream includes isobutane, argon, and nitrogen. In some embodiments, the feed stream includes a hydrogen gas (H2). In some embodiments, the applying is performed at a temperature greater than approximately 300° C. In some embodiments, the applying is performed at a temperature in the range of approximately 300° C. to approximately 500° C. In some embodiments, the applying is performed at a pressure in the range from about 1 psig to about 150 psig. In some embodiments, the applying is performed at a pressure of greater than about 50 psig. In some embodiments, the higher molecular weight hydrocarbon comprises a C8+ hydrocarbon. In some embodiments, the C8+ hydrocarbon is at least one of octane, nonane, decane, undecane, dodecane, octene, nonene, decene, undecene, dodecene, octyne, nonyne, decyne, undecyne, dodecyne, cyclooctane, cyclononane, cyclodecane, cycloundecane, cyclododecane, octadiene, nonadiene, decadiene, undecadiene, or dodecadiene.
Some embodiments of the present disclosure are illustrated in the referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting.
The embodiments described herein should not necessarily be construed as limited to addressing any of the particular problems or deficiencies discussed herein. References in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, “some embodiments”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
As used herein the term “substantially” is used to indicate that exact values are not necessarily attainable. By way of example, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that in some chemical reactions 100% conversion of a reactant is possible, yet unlikely. Most of a reactant may be converted to a product and conversion of the reactant may asymptotically approach 100% conversion. So, although from a practical perspective 100% of the reactant is converted, from a technical perspective, a small and sometimes difficult to define amount remains. For this example of a chemical reactant, that amount may be relatively easily defined by the detection limits of the instrument used to test for it. However, in many cases, this amount may not be easily defined, hence the use of the term “substantially”. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “substantially” is defined as approaching a specific numeric value or target to within 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, or within 1% of the value or target. In further embodiments of the present invention, the term “substantially” is defined as approaching a specific numeric value or target to within 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, or 0.1% of the value or target.
As used herein, the term “about” is used to indicate that exact values are not necessarily attainable. Therefore, the term “about” is used to indicate this uncertainty limit. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit of less than or equal to +20%, +15%, +10%, +5%, or +1% of a specific numeric value or target. In some embodiments of the present invention, the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit of less than or equal to +1%, +0.9%, +0.8%, +0.7%, +0.6%, +0.5%, +0.4%, +0.3%, +0.2%, or +0.1% of a specific numeric value or target.
As used herein, C8+ hydrocarbons or olefins refer to a compound having eight (8) or more carbons. The carbons may have single bonds (i.e., be alkanes), double bonds (i.e., be alkenes), triple bonds (i.e., alkynes), and/or may be aromatic (i.e., have the carbons arranged in a ring). Examples of C8+ hydrocarbons include (but are not limited to): octane, nonane, decane, undecane, dodecane, octene, nonene, decene, undecene, dodecene, octyne, nonyne, decyne, undecyne, dodecyne, cyclooctane, cyclononane, cyclodecane, cycloundecane, cyclododecane, octadiene, nonadiene, decadiene, undecadiene, or dodecadiene.
Among other things, the present disclosure relates to a dehydrogenative coupling process to convert alkanes to longer chain olefins in a single process step. These longer chain olefins (i.e., C8+ hydrocarbons) may utilized (either with or without further processing) for sustainable aviation fuel, jet fuel, or other fuel and/or energy operations. The approach described herein combats the thermodynamics of traditional dehydrogenation by consuming the products as they form. Also, this dehydrogenative coupling reaction in a single reactor could enable increased per-pass yield of desirable C8+ olefins, compared to a traditional two reactors in a series, where the first reactor (where the dehydrogenation is occurring) suffers from the thermodynamic limitation. Using two reactors in series does enable control of the reaction conditions for each step (dehydrogenation and coupling) independently, but the thermodynamic equilibrium of isobutane dehydrogenation may limit the concentration of olefins available for subsequent conversion, leading to a limited per-pass yield of C8+ hydrocarbons (HCs). The methods described herein showed initial results in forming C8+ HCs with up to approximately 31% selectivity at approximately 20% conversion. This method of coupling cascade chemistry is distinct in its focus to (1) utilize and upgrade otherwise-wasted light paraffins (which may be used as a fuel gas in biorefinery models) and (2) develop a new 1—step process that enables the desired chemistry in a single reactor. The methods described herein may be integrated into existing processes as a route to produce valuable olefin products from waste carbon sources.
Presently, no commercial processes exist to perform dehydrogenation and subsequent coupling in a single reactor, likely due to mismatched reaction conditions for each step. For example, alkane conversion via dehydrogenation is thermodynamically limited at moderate temperatures (e.g., approximately 200° C.), and therefore, the reaction is typically performed at high temperatures (in the range of approximately 400-500° C.) and at approximately atmospheric pressure. An industrial alkane dehydrogenation catalyst, Pt—Sn/Al2O3, exhibits high isobutene selectivity during isobutane dehydrogenation. However, the subsequent coupling of isobutene to higher molecular weight olefins is usually performed on solid acid catalysts at temperatures below approximately 200° C. and at high pressure. The process intensification approach envisioned here demonstrates a dehydrogenative coupling reaction that surpasses the thermodynamically-limited dehydrogenation activity at moderate temperatures by consuming the dehydrogenated olefin product via acid-catalyzed coupling as it is produced. This process intensification approach is intended to reduce the capital and operating expenses in a biorefinery.
The conversion of alkanes to fuel-range hydrocarbons (i.e., C8+ HCs) in one step, referred to herein as “dehydrogenative coupling”, offers a process intensification approach to reduce capital and operating expenses in a biorefinery. There are no present commercial technologies to convert alkanes directly to long chain olefins in a single reactor. Existing industrial processes convert alkanes to olefins or oligomerize olefins using multiple process steps. Dehydrogenation occurs at high reaction temperatures (in the range of approximately 400-500° C.) and approximately atmospheric pressure while oligomerization occurs at low reaction temperatures (less than approximately 200° C.) and high pressure (up to approximately 1000 psig). Expensive chemical co-activators are also used to facilitate reactions over homogeneous oligomerization catalysts. Our proposed process implements heterogeneous catalysts to perform dehydrogenation and oligomerization in a single reactor with low aromatic hydrocarbon yield.
A total of 10 catalyst systems comprising dehydrogenation and coupling active components were evaluated over a range of reaction temperatures (in the range of approximately 240° C.-400° C.) and pressures (from approximately atmospheric/ambient up to approximately 150 psig) with an isobutane feed stream ranging from approximately 1% to approximately 90% isobutane (mixed with approximately 1% Ar and a balance of N2). Benchmark dehydrogenation catalysts Pt—Sn/Al2O3 and Zn/BEA were evaluated for comparison. To inform the synthesis of next-generation catalysts, the acid sites responsible for coupling and cracking reactions were quantified by NH3—temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and the structure of the benchmark Pt—Sn/Al2O3 catalyst was determined by X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The catalytic results demonstrated that several mixed-bed catalyst systems successfully produce C8+ HCs at high reaction temperatures (greater than approximately 300° C.) and pressures (greater than approximately 50 psig) with conversions up to approximately 33% and C8+ HC selectivity up to approximately 31%. The C5+ HC selectivities of up to approximately 78% over Pt—Sn/Al2O3 catalyst systems and approximately 73% over Zn/BEA catalysts suggest that coupling chemistry initially proceeds with high selectivity; however, secondary cracking reactions of coupled products occurred, and it was found that catalysts with higher acid site density promoted these cracking reactions. Results using coupling catalysts that have been chemically modified to have lower acid site strength and density show improved C8+ HC selectivity up to approximately 57%, which suggests that tuning acid site chemistry can improve selectivity in a dehydrogenative coupling process.
Isoalkanes, like isobutane, are produced from the syngas-to-hydrocarbons (STH) process and are a precursor to jet-range HCs through dehydrogenation and coupling. Presently, no commercial processes exist to perform alkane dehydrogenation and subsequent coupling of alkenes in a single reactor, likely due to the typical conditions for each reaction being mismatched. The results reported here successfully demonstrated the proof-of-concept and set the baseline performance for the direct dehydrogenative coupling of isobutane to higher hydrocarbons. Furthermore, although the conversion of isobutane is thermodynamically limited to approximately 18% at approximately 400° C., conversions up to approximately 33% at approximately 400° C. were observed, indicating that the equilibrium conversion of isobutane can be surpassed by consuming isobutene as it is produced. This is impactful because it indicates that a single catalyst bed under a single set of reaction conditions can promote higher conversions of isobutane and the formation of higher molecular weight HCs. The alternative approach of using 2 reactors in series would enable control of the reaction conditions for each step (dehydrogenation and coupling) independently, but the thermodynamic equilibrium of isobutane dehydrogenation would limit the concentration of isobutene available for subsequent conversion, leading to a limited per-pass yield of jet-range HCs.
The methods of the present disclosure included increased reaction pressure, higher isobutane partial pressure by utilizing liquid feed stream, increased reaction temperature, increased reaction weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of isobutane, increased isobutane concentration, and/or tailored or modified active sites in bifunctional catalysts or dual catalyst systems. For increased reactor pressure, current reactor limitations inhibit operating pressures greater than approximately 150 psig, but the results presented herein showed that higher reaction pressures lead to higher C8+ HC selectivity. A gas mixture containing approximately 1% isobutane was utilized allowing for an isobutane partial pressure (Pic4) of approximately 1 psig. Reactor modification allowing for the feed stream of dilute isobutane blends at high pressure may enable higher Pic4 leading to improved C8+ HC selectivity. For higher isobutane partial pressure by utilizing liquid feed stream, approximately 100% isobutane is a liquid at standard temperature and pressure (STP) with a gas head space pressure of approximately 24 psig. This head space pressure was used to deliver isobutance at the various concentrations (achieved by mixing with N2 gas) summarized within this disclosure. This head space limitations may be overcome by applying the liquid (that is approximately 100% isobutane) at a high pressure. Again, reactor modification may be needed to enable liquid feed stream at a high pressure, which may enable the performance of dehydrogenative coupling with both higher isobutane concentrations and higher Pica to promote increased C8+ HC selectivity. Regarding tailored active sites in bifunctional catalysts or dual catalyst systems, the silica-to-alumina ratio (SAR of BEA zeolite is correlated to increased cracking activity, where lower SAR values (greater acid-site density) may lead to higher cracking selectivity. The data comparing two SAR values in the Zn/BEA system demonstrated that coupling selectivity may be increased with corresponding decrease in cracking selectivity by choosing a higher SAR material (and lower acid site density). Acid site modification is another method of tailoring active sites for improved C8+ HC selectivity. Modification with a phosphoric acid (H3PO4) solution was performed on several commercially available coupling catalysts (amorphous silica-alumina SiAl, H/BEA, and H/FAU) to chemically modify acid site density and acid strength through the incorporation of phosphate (POx) groups. The data comparing the unmodified and H3PO4-modified (denoted as “POx”) catalysts showed that acid modification decreases cracking activity and subsequently increases C8+ HC selectivity.
The syngas-to-hydrocarbons (STH) process is highly effective at converting syngas and/or CO2 directly to isoalkanes, which are excellent jet fuel precursors via subsequent dehydrogenation and olefin coupling. Conceptually, the direct reaction of isoalkanes in one step, termed here “dehydrogenative coupling” offers a process intensification approach to reduce capital and operating expenses in a biorefinery. Presently, no commercial process exists to perform dehydrogenation and subsequent coupling in a single reactor, likely due to mismatched reaction conditions for each step. For example, alkane conversion via dehydrogenation is thermodynamically limited at moderate temperatures (e.g., approximately 200° C.) and therefore, the reaction is typically performed at high temperatures (e.g., approximately 400-500° C.) and at approximately atmospheric pressure. An industrial alkane dehydrogenation catalyst, Pt—Sn/Al2O3, exhibits high isobutane selectivity during isobutane dehydrogenation. However, the subsequent coupling of isobutene to higher molecular weight olefins is usually performed on sold acid catalysts like tungstated zirconia (WO3—ZrO2), sulfated zirconia, silica-alumina, and zeolites at temperatures below approximately 200° C. and at a relatively high pressure. Among these, zeolites are acid catalysts that have exhibited exceptional olefin dimerization performance. The process intensification approach described herein may enable a dehydrogenative coupling reaction that surpasses the thermodynamically-limited dehydrogenation activity at moderate temperatures by consuming the isobutene product via acid-catalyzed coupling as it is produced. This dehydrogenative coupling reaction could enable increased per-pass yield of jet range HCs (C8+) in a single reactor versus two reactors in a series, where the first reactor (dehydrogenation) suffers from the thermodynamic limitation. Here, we report our baseline catalytic assessment for the dehydrogenative coupling of a feed stream of isobutane to higher molecular weight HCs over a mixed bed (or a mixed catalyst bed) containing a dehydrogenation catalyst and a coupling catalyst.
In experiments, two catalysts were selected that may perform the isobutane dehydrogenation reaction: a Pt-based catalyst (Pt—Sn/Al2O3 (PSA)) and a Zn-modified BEA zeolite catalyst (Zn/BEA). To facilitate coupling in the catalyst systems studied here, four acid catalysts were selected. BEA zeolite was selected because it has a large enough pore size to accommodate the carbon-carbon coupling reaction and subsequent desorption of large molecular weight products. In zeolites, it was found that lower SAR values (i.e., higher acid site densities) lead to higher coupling activity but faster deactivation rates. Because of this, two BEA catalysts with SAR values of approximately 27 and approximately 150 were evaluated to investigated the role of acid site density on product selectivity. Two non-zeolite acid catalysts, WO3—ZrO3 and SiO2—Al2O3, were also evaluated to compare the performance of non-porous acid catalysts to the microporous zeolite.
In some embodiments, in addition to the desired dehydrogenative coupling of isobutane to produce C8+ HCs via an isobutene intermediate, isomerization and cracking side-reactions may occur. The reaction network is shown in
Bench-scale experimentation was done for catalytic evaluation of the dehydrogenation catalyst in a microscale reactor at approximately atmospheric pressure and temperatures in the range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 450° C. using an approximately 1% isobutane, approximately 1% argon, and approximately 98% nitrogen feed stream at a weight hourly space velocity of approximately 0.20 gisobutane gcat−1h−1. The reactor effluent was evaluated using gas chromatography in a gas chromatographer having 4 columns containing up to 6 carbons. The products were grouped by reaction type and the resulting data is shown in
For Zn/BEA (SAR 27) at reaction temperatures between approximately 300° C. and approximately 450° C., relatively low yields (less than about 5%) to light HC products were observed with isobutene (approximately 3% yield). Compared to PSA, a lower yield of isobutene was observed from Zn/BEA at the majority of reaction conditions, and there was a great yield of isomerized C4 products, likely due to the acidic nature of the BEA support. As the reaction temperature increased, the conversion approached approximately 100%, although the product yields remained below approximately 5%, indicating that most products were not detected. Undetected products may include deposited coke, especially at high temperatures, but may also include desired higher molecular weight products (C6+) that could not be or were not detected by the microgas chromatographer.
In some embodiments, dehydrogenative coupling of isobutane to higher molecular weight HCs in a single reactor was evaluated in an approximately ½ inch diameter stainless steel reactor applying approximately 1% isobutane, approximately 1% argon, and approximately 98% nitrogen at temperatures in the range of approximately 240° C. to approximately 400° C. and pressures from approximately atmospheric to approximately 100 psig. Two types of catalysts were evaluated (see Table 2): a mixed bed containing approximately 1 g PSA with approximately 0.5 g coupling catalyst (e.g., BEA, SiO2—AlO3, WO3—ZrO2), diluted with approximately 1.5 g of SiC and 2) a mixed bed containing approximately 1 g Zn/BEA or Zn/SiO2—Al2O3 diluted with approximately 2 g of SiC. Prior to each reaction, the catalyst bed was pretreated at approximately 350° C. in approximately 75 sccm of hydrogen and the reactor was allowed to cool to approximately room temperature in hydrogen before flowing the isobutane gas mixture.
The conversion and product selectivity observed over PSA (catalyst system 01) in these experiments were consistent with those observed in the microreactor-greater than approximately 90% selectivity to isobutene was obtained without significant evidence of coupling chemistry observed (i.e., no C8+ products were observed). Reaction temperatures between 240° C. and 300° C. were evaluated and conversions between approximately 0.5% and approximately 6% were obtained. These data indicate that the alumina in PSA does not provide the necessary acid sites to perform coupling under these conditions and that a different coupling component may be needed. When catalyst systems 02-07 were evaluated at reaction temperatures below approximately 300° C., isobutene conversion was less than approximately 5%. Therefore, reaction temperatures of approximately 300° C. and above are the focus of this present disclosure.
Under the tested reaction conditions, the thermodynamic equilibrium limit for isobutane conversion to isobutene appeared to be approximately 7% at approximately 300° C. and approximately 18% at approximately 400° C. (see Table 1). Catalyst systems employing a coupling catalyst with the PSA catalyst resulted in conversions near or slightly exceeding the predicted thermodynamic limit (see
Due to the low isobutane concentration in the feed stream gas (approximately 1%), the resulting low product concentrations were challenging to detect and identify using mass spectrometry. To determine an approximate retention time for heavy products and aid product assignments, the headspace gas of several high molecular weight compounds was manually injected into the gas chromatographer. The Cs compound, 1-octene, eluted from the column at approximately 9.1 min, and therefore, all products observed at higher retention times were considered as Cs hydrocarbons. Products from the dehydrogenative coupling reactions were grouped as light HCs (i.e., methane, ethane, ethylene, propane, and propylene), C5+ HCs, and C8+ HCs (see
For the catalyst system containing PSA physically mixed with a coupling catalyst, higher reaction temperatures appeared to lead to increased conversion and higher reactor pressure, which appeared to lead to an increase in C8+ selectivity. For Pt—Sn/Al2O3+ HBEA-150 (
For the catalyst systems containing PSA as the dehydrogenation component, C8+ HCs were successfully formed in each system, but each system required different reaction conditions. Despite comparable acid site densities, the Pt—Sn/Al2O3+ HBEA-150 formed C8+ HCs at lower reaction temperatures than Pt—Sn/Al2O3 with Sn/Al2O3 or WO3—ZrO2. Thus, the number of acid sites determined by NH3—TPD does not trend with their performance. The observed activity could be due to the strength of the acid sites in the coupling component. Typically, the Brønsted acid sites on BEA zeolite are considered stronger than the Brønsted and Lewis acid sites of non-zeolite materials SiO2—Al2O3 and WO3—ZrO2, as described in some embodiments herein. The lower temperature onset for C8+ formation over SiO2—Al2O3 suggests that this material may have stronger acid sites than WO3—ZrO2.
The role of pressure in these catalyst systems was investigated when the reactor's temperature was held constant at approximately 400° C., where the highest conversion was observed (see
Thus, the reactor pressure was identified as an important variable enabling increased isobutane conversion and C8+ selectivity. To evaluate the role of the partial pressure of isobutane on catalyst performance, an approximately 20% isobutane, approximately 2% Ar in an N2 tank was used to achieve isobutane concentrations of approximately 10%, approximately 15% and approximately 20%. This study was performed on the PSA+SiO2—Al2O3 catalyst system, which was identified as the catalyst system (03) yielding the highest C8+ HC selectivity. The resulting conversions and C4− free product distributions for experiments performed at approximately 50 psig (due to tank pressure limitations) are shown in
These results demonstrate that lower conversion is achieved with approximately 20% isobutane (approximately 5.5% and approximately 400° C.) than approximately 1% isobutane (approximately 13.8% and approximately 400° C.). This could be due to a maximum molar conversion rate per site over the catalyst. However, despite lower conversion, no change in product distribution was observed. In other words, higher concentrations of isobutane in the feed stream did not prevent cracking to C3. HCs, as was predicted. Therefore, it appears that the total reactor pressure is more important than the partial pressure of isobutane for achieving high C8+ HC selectivity.
The Zn/BEA catalyst systems demonstrated a different product distribution than those containing PSA (
In some embodiments, a Zn/BEA catalyst with a higher SAR (lower acid site density) may facilitate coupling while preventing cracking. To this end, Zn/BEA-150 was prepared and evaluated, where the parent BEA zeolite has a SAR of approximately 150. Similar trends in conversion and selectivity with reaction temperature and pressure were observed for Zn/BEA-150 and Zn/BEA-27 (
In some embodiment, another approach to reduce cracking selectivity and promote coupling selectivity may be taken by preparing a Zn/SiO2—Al2O3 catalyst. This approach was inspired by the SiO2—Al2O3 providing the greatest C8+ selectivity when combined with the Pt—Sn/Al2O3 dehydrogenation catalyst. In the Zn/SiO2—Al2O3 catalyst, a Zn2+ dehydrogenation active site similar to that in Zn/BEA was envisioned being supported on the acidic SiO2—Al2O3 having an intermediate acid site density (694 umolH+/g). However, for Zn/SiO2—Al2O3, the dehydrogenation activity was low, leading to low conversion and minimal coupling (
The role of pressure was investigated when the reactor temperature was held constant at approximately 400° C., where the highest conversion was observed (See
Under the reaction conditions explored herein, the thermodynamic equilibrium limit for isobutane conversion is approximately 7% at approximately 300° C. and approximately 18% at approximately 400° C. (see Table 1). Catalyst systems employing a coupling catalyst with the Pt—Sn/Al2O3 catalyst resulted in conversions near or slightly exceeding the thermodynamic limit. However, conversions up to approximately 33% were observed at approximately 400° C. over Zn/BEA (SAR 27), indicating that the alternative approach of using two reactors in series would enable control of the reaction conditions for each step (dehydrogenation and coupling) independently, but the thermodynamic equilibrium of isobutane dehydrogenation would limit the concentration of isobutene available for subsequent conversion, leading to a limited per-pass yield of jet fuel-range HCs (i.e., C8+ HCs).
The results for the catalyst systems containing the Pt—Sn/Al2O3 dehydrogenation component demonstrated that increased reaction pressure is required to selectively promote C8+ HC formation. The current experimental reactor system cannot feed this isobutane mixture at pressures greater than 100 psig. Reactor modification to explore higher pressure reaction conditions are expected to improve C8+ selectivity.
It is expected that improved C8+ selectivity can be obtained by increasing the concentration of isobutane in the feed stream. However, isobutane is a liquid at standard temperatures and pressures (STP). The current experimental reactor systems cannot flow liquid at the high pressures required for this reaction. Attempts were made to apply the headspace gas from approximately 100% isobutane, but the gas pressure at STP is limited to approximately 24 psig. A high-pressure liquid feed stream consisting of approximately 100% isobutane will enable us to reliably control the feed stream concentration using N2 as a diluent. With reactor modifications, it is expected that higher partial pressures of isobutane, achieved by increasing reaction pressure or the isobutane concentration in the feed stream, will improve the dehydrogenative coupling performance and promote increased C8+ selectivity.
The results from the catalyst systems containing Zn/BEA indicate that acidity is an important catalyst property that will lead to improved catalyst performance. For the Zn/BEA materials, an increase in the SAR led to a decrease in cracking activity. This suggests that although the acid sites of the BEA materials are active for coupling performance, a high concentration of acid sites lead to cracking of desired products to smaller, undesired HCs.
Two SAR values for BEA zeolite were compared, but another approach to control the acid character is to change the zeolite morphology. For example, faujasite (FAU) is another large-pore zeolite that has recently been investigated for the coupling of ethylene, and this zeolite is of interest in the next-generation of catalysts developed here.
The data examined herein was collected using mixed-bed configurations containing a similar ratio of dehydrogenation and coupling components (approximately 2:1) or a single component with both dehydrogenation and coupling active sites. Another approach to improve C8+ selectivity is by controlling the ratio of each component in the bed. Modifications to the current mixed bed configuration can be made by loading a larger concentration of the coupling component to promote the conversion of C4 olefin isomers to higher molecular weight products.
The SiAl and H/BEA (SAR 27) catalysts studied above, in addition to a faujasite (FAU) catalyst, were chemically modified to alter acid site characteristics. This was done to identify the effects of tuned acid site density and strength on improved C8+ HC selectivity in dehydrogenative coupling. Phosphate (POx) modification was performed on the aforementioned catalysts to represent methods for chemically altering acid sites. Three modified catalysts were produced: POx/SiAl, POx/BEA, and POx/FAU, with approximate phosphorus weight loadings of 4 wt %.
Characterization of acid sites, on the unmodified and POx—modified catalysts is shown in
The effects of chemical modification on suppressed HC cracking were studied using a probe isobutane (iC4) cracking light off experiment. In some embodiment of these cracking experiments, approximately 50 mg of unmodified and POx—modified SiAl, H/BEA, and H/FAU were loaded into a ¼ inch diameter quartz reactor applying approximately 1% isobutane, approximately 1% argon, and approximately 98% nitrogen at temperatures in the range of approximately 200° C. to approximately 500° C. at a pressure of approximately 29 psig.
SiAl and POx/SiAl were chosen to represent an unmodified and chemically-modified pair of coupling catalysts. Theses catalysts were combined with the Pt—Sn/Al2O3 dehydrogenation catalyst at a mass ratio of 0.5 coupling: 1 dehydrogenation catalyst. These catalysts were studied in various embodiments of the dehydrogenative coupling process to examine the effects of chemical modification on C8+ HC selectivity. Prior to each reaction, the catalyst bed was pretreated at approximately 350° C. in approximately 75 sccm of hydrogen and the reactor was allowed to cool to the desired operating temperature before flowing the isobutane gas mixture.
Temperature sweep experiments shown in
iC4 concentration sweep experiments were performed on the same mixed-beds of PSA+ SiAl and PSA+POx/SiAl. These experiments used a liquid tank of pure isobutane, with a gas head space pressure of approximately 24 psig. This head space pressure was used to deliver isobutane at the various concentrations, achieved by mixing with N2 gas. Increasing iC4 concentration decreased C8+ selectivity, increased cracking product selectivity and increased the conversion of iC4 to olefin products, as summarized in
PSA and POx/SiAl were combined at varying mass ratios to demonstrate the effects of changing ratio of coupling and dehydrogenation catalyst in a mixed bed. Three mass ratios of POx/SiAl: PSA were selected: 0.5:1, 2:1, and 5:1 to represent coupling-lean and coupling-rich bed compositions. These mixed-beds were studied in various embodiments of the dehydrogenative coupling process to understand the effects of changing mass ratio, changing pressure, changing temperature, changing weight hourly space velocity, and the presence of cofed H2 on C8+ HC selectivity. Prior to each reaction, the catalyst bed was pretreated at approximately 350° C. in approximately 75 sccm of hydrogen and the reactor was allowed to cool to the desired operating temperature before flowing the isobutane gas mixture. The conversion, C8+ HC productivity (prod), and selectivity (sel) to all HC products, grouped as light HCs (C1-3), C4 paraffins excluding isobutane (C4), C4 olefins (C4═), intermediate HCs (C5-7) and target HC products (C8+), is summarized in Tables 4-6, for POx/SiAl: PSA mass ratios of 0.5:1, 2:1, and 5:1, respectively. As changing bed compositions altered the total mass of both PSA and POx/SiAl present, the C8+ HC productivity has been normalized by the mass of PSA. All varied mass ratio loadings of catalyst were diluted with SiC to ensure uniform heat transfer effects and bed volumes. This ensured uniform gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of iC4 through the mixed catalyst bed.
aPressure for this condition was held at 100 psig.
bPressure for this condition was held at 150 psig.
aInlet gas composition for this condition was held at 8.8% iC4 at a H2/iC4 molar ratio of 1.25.
bInlet gas composition for this condition was held at 7.6% iC4 at a H2/iC4 molar ratio of 3.0.
Increasing temperature on these mixed-beds generally increased iC4 conversion. Conversion increased from 2.24% to 2.78% on the 0.5:1 bed, from 2.49% to 2.92% on the 2:1 bed, and decreased from 2.06% to 1.32% on the 5:1 bed between 350° C. and 400° C., respectively. Increasing the temperature is expected to benefit dehydrogenation activity, at the expense of coupling performance. For the 0.5:1 catalyst bed, C8+ HC selectivity decreased with increasing temperature. The C8+ HC selectivity increased on the 2:1 catalyst bed with increasing temperature and decreased on the 5:1 catalyst beds with increasing temperature. These data suggest that a combined effort of tuning temperature and catalyst bed composition can improve both isoalkane conversion and C8+ HC selectivity in a dehydrogenative coupling process.
Previous reports have demonstrated that coapplying H2 with isoalkanes can improve dehydrogenation conversion and catalyst stability through the H2-driven removal of coke species. As such, some embodiments of dehydrogenative coupling testing included the coapplying of H2 alongside iC4 over the mixed catalyst bed comprising 5.0 POx/SiAl: 1 PSA at 350° C. Two molar ratios of H2:IC4 were selected to represent the effects of cofed H2. These were 1.25:1 and 3:1, as summarized in Table 6. Adding H2 in a H2:IC4 ratio of 1.25 had minimal effect on total conversion (2.06% vs 2.10%), decreased selectivity to C1-3, C4, C5-7, and C8+ HCs, and increased selectivity C4 HCs. Increasing the H2:IC4 ratio to 3.0 decreased total conversion to 1.60%, continued to decrease selectivity to C1-3, C4=, and C5-7 HCs, and increased selectivity to both C4 and C8+ HCs. C8+ HC productivity was found to first decrease from 0.0225 mmol/gPSA/h without cofed H2 to 0.0207 mmol/gPSA/h at a H2/iC4 ratio of 1.25. The productivity then increased to 0.0260 mmol/gPSA/h when the H2/iC4 ratio was increased to 3.0. This data suggests that H2 cofed in the feed stream can be used to benefit C8+ HC selectivity and C8+ HC productivity, with minor effects on conversion.
The foregoing discussion and examples have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the aspects, embodiments, or configurations to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the aspects, embodiments, or configurations are grouped together in one or more embodiments, configurations, or aspects for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the aspects, embodiments, or configurations, may be combined in alternate aspects, embodiments, or configurations other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the aspects, embodiments, or configurations require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment, configuration, or aspect. While certain aspects of conventional technology have been discussed to facilitate disclosure of some embodiments of the present invention, the Applicants in no way disclaim these technical aspects, and it is contemplated that the claimed invention may encompass one or more of the conventional technical aspects discussed herein. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate aspect, embodiment, or configuration.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,666 filed on Mar. 28, 2023, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention was made with United States government support under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63492666 | Mar 2023 | US |