Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Embodiments of an assay for the screening, diagnosis, and differentiation of Alzheimer's disease uses selected sets of serum protein biomarkers. The assay is used to distinguish Alzheimer's disease from Parkinson's disease, other neurodegenerative diseases, and normal controls. Specific sets of serum protein biomarkers are identified for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in drug naïve and drug treated patients.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates in general to a method for screening and/or diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. In particular, the present invention relates a set of biomarkers and their use in the screening and/or diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in humans.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disorder that gradually destroys a person's memory and ability to learn, reason, make judgments, communicate and carry out daily activities. As AD progresses, individuals may also experience changes in personality and behavior, such as anxiety, suspiciousness or agitation, as well as delusions or hallucinations. An estimated 4.5 million Americans have AD. The number of Americans with AD has more than doubled since 1980 and is predicted to reach from 11.3 million to 16 million patients.

Presently, the diagnosis of AD is a clinical one. The usual diagnostic process consists of a full medical history, a comprehensive physical and neurological examination, as well as assessing a patient's cognitive status. Cognitive impairment is typically tested using standardized cognitive screening test call the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). A patient's MMSE score is generally combined with clinical features and laboratory test results to classify the severity of AD as Normal, Mild, Moderate, or Severe.

Detection of abnormalities in the genome of an individual can reveal the risk or potential risk for individuals to develop a disease. The transition from risk to emergence of disease can be characterized as an expression of genomic abnormalities in the proteome. Thus, the appearance of abnormalities in the proteome signals the beginning of the process of cascading effects that can result in the deterioration of the health of the patient. Therefore, detection of proteomic abnormalities at an early stage is desired in order to allow for detection of disease either before it is established or in its earliest stages where treatment may be effective.

Accurate and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be difficult, especially in early stages when there is often an insidious onset of symptoms overlapping with different disorders. Delays in diagnosis or inappropriate treatment can allow irreversible neurological damage and/or render treatment less effective, than if people were diagnosed and treated earlier, particularly on the basis of an accurate blood test that could be performed on a routine basis.

With the advent of FDA approved drugs for the symptoms of dementia, patients with suspected dementias are often given medication early, prior to diagnosis, and they respond with improved cognition. This, along with widespread use of other over the counter and prescription medications in general introduces additional variables that must be taken into account when attempting to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Employing profiles of gene expression or protein biomarker concentrations for molecular diagnostics must be carried out with this in mind. Hence, a desired attribute of a diagnostic test for Alzheimer's disease is the ability to diagnose AD in drug treated patients.

In Alzheimer's disease, the dementia risk Apo E ε4 gene allele is inherited as one of three Apo E alleles, termed ε2, ε3, and ε4, with mean frequencies in the general population of about 8%, 78%, and 14%, respectively (Utermann G. et al. 1980. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32, 339-347), whereas approximately 50% of the Alzheimer's disease patients are Apo E ε4 allele carriers. The degree of risk of dementia conferred by the Apo E ε4 allele rises in a “gene dose” dependent manner (Corder E. H. et al. 1993. Science 261, 921-923), increasing with the number of Apo E ε4 alleles inherited from zero (i.e. Apo E ε4 non-carriers), to carriers of one Apo E ε4 allele (i.e. ε4/ε3; ε4/ε2 hetero-zygotes), to two Apo E ε4 alleles (i.e. ε4/ε4 homo-zygotes, all of whom are capable of developing Alzheimer's disease, although those lacking the Apo E ε4 allele may tend to get the disease at a later age of onset. Furthermore, the parenchymal and vascular amyloid neuropathology is greater in non-demented Apo E ε4 carriers than in non-demented non-carriers of Apo E ε4. Therefore, another desired attribute of a diagnostic test for Alzheimer's disease is the ability to diagnose AD in patients vs. normal and disease controls in Apo E ε4 allele carriers and non-carriers.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis has been used in research laboratories for biomarker discovery for three decades. In the past, this method has been considered highly specialized, labor intensive and non-reproducible. Recently with the advent of integrated supplies, robotics, and software, combined with bioinformatics, the progression of this proteomics technique in the direction of diagnostics has become feasible.

The utility of 2D gel electrophoresis is based on its ability to detect changes in expression of intact proteins to separate and discriminate between specific intact protein isoforms that arise due to variations in amino acid sequence and/or post-synthetic protein modifications such as phosphotylation, ubiquitination, conjugation with ubiquitin-like proteins, acetylation, glycosylation, and proteolytic processing. These are critical features in cellular and physiological regulation.

Recent progress using a novel form of mass spectrometry called surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization time of flight (SELDI-TOF) for the testing of ovarian cancer and Alzheimer's disease has led to an increased interest in proteomics as a diagnostic tool (Petrocoin, E. F. et al. 2002. Lancet 359:572-577; Lewczuk, P. et al. 2004. Biol. Psychiatry 55:524-530). Furthermore, proteomics has been applied to the study of breast cancer through use of 2D gel electrophoresis and image analysis to study the development and progression of breast carcinoma in patients and in plasma from Alzheimer's disease patients (Kuerer, H. M. et al. 2002. Cancer 95:2276-2282; Ueno, I. et al. 2000. Electrophoresis 21:1832-1845). In the case of breast cancer, breast ductal fluid specimens were used to identify distinct protein expression patterns in bilateral matched pair ductal fluid samples of women with unilateral invasive breast carcinoma.

Detection of biomarkers is an active field of research. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,785 discloses a biomarker for detecting long-term or chronic alcohol consumption. The biomarker disclosed is a single biomarker and is identified as an alcohol-specific ethanol glycoconjugate. U.S. Pat. No. 6,124,108 discloses a biomarker for mustard chemical injury. The biomarker is a specific protein band detected through gel electrophoresis and the patent describes use of the biomarker to raise protective antibodies or in a kit to identify the presence or absence of the biomarker in individuals who may have been exposed to mustard poisoning.

There is a tremendous need for a simple assay that can be used to screen patients for Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as a definitive diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of AD and distinguish it from other AD-Like disorders that display similar symptoms but have different treatment options and prognosis. Clinicians have long sought such tests in hopes of providing earlier treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a diagnostic assay for differentiating patient's having Alzheimer's disease (AD) from patients with AD-Like disorders, and from non-demented normal controls. The method comprises collecting a biological sample from a patient having symptoms consistent with AD, quantitating up to 57 protein biomarkers identified as related to AD or AD-Like disorders, and determining whether or not the patient has AD or an AD-Like disorder based on the statistical analysis of the quantity of the selected protein biomarkers.

One aspect of the present invention is a method for screening a patient for AD or AD-Like disorders. The method includes: collecting a serum sample from a patient having symptoms consistent with AD, separating the proteins in the serum sample by 2D gel electrophoresis, quantitating a panel of protein biomarkers, and determining whether or not the patient has a AD or an AD-Like disorder based on the quantity of those biomarkers in the patient's serum.

Another aspect of the present invention is a method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease comprising: collecting a serum sample from a test subject that is untreated with anti-dementia drugs; analyzing the serum sample for a change in expression of a set of forty seven protein biomarkers; and using the change in expression of the set of biomarkers to diagnose the test subject, wherein the set of biomarkers includes Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E3, and a Transthyretin protein, a Haptoglobin protein; a Complement C3 protein, a Complement Factor, and a Transferrin.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease comprising: obtaining a patient serum sample from a test subject being treated with an anti-dementia drug; determining if the patient serum sample contains Apolipoprotein E4 protein; and quantitating a concentration of a set of 57 serum proteins in the patient serum sample; whereby a variation in the serum concentration of the set of fifty seven serum proteins from a mean serum concentration of the set of 57 serum protein in non-Alzheimer control serum is a positive diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

The foregoing has outlined rather broadly several aspects of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed might be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or redesigning the structures for carrying out the same purposes as the invention. It should be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a digital fluorescent image of blood serum proteins resolved by 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gen electrophoresis with 57 biomarkers circled and numbered.

FIG. 2 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals and drug naïve Alzheimer's patients.

FIG. 3 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, and drug naïve patients having AD-like symptoms.

FIG. 4 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, drug naïve patients having AD-like symptoms, and drug anive AD-like Parkinson's disease patients.

FIG. 5 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, and drug naïve patients with Lewy body dementia having AD-like symptoms.

FIG. 6 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, and drug naïve stroke related ±mixed AD-like dementia.

FIG. 7 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug nave Alzheimer's patients, and drug naïve Frontotemporal ±mixed AD-like dementia.

FIGS. 8A and 8B show the discriminate analysis of serum samples from age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, and drug naïve patients with AD-like disorders.

FIG. 9 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 47 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug naïve Alzheimer's patients, and drug treated Alzheimer's patients.

FIG. 10 shows the medication profile of patients from the prospectively collected newly drawn AD patient samples (“drug treated Alzheimer's disease patients,” DTAD, n=39).

FIG. 11 shows the multivariate linear discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of the probabilities of diagnosis obtained employing the combined concentrations of the 47 biomarkers to discriminate between prospectively collected and banked drug naïve AD patient samples (DNAD, n=44) and prospectively collected newly drawn drug treated AD patient samples (DTAD, n=39).

FIG. 12 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 57 biomarkers in age-matched normal control individuals, drug treated Alzheimer's patients, and drug treated Parkinson's patients.

FIG. 13 is a schematic representation of the results of a stepwise linear discriminant analysis for distinguishing DTAD patients from age-matched normal controls and DTPD from age-matched normal controls.

FIG. 14 is a canonical plot using 14 biomarkers for distinguishing DTAD patients from age-matched normal controls and a summary of results using 14, 33, or 57 biomarkers for distinguishing DTAD patients from age-matched normal controls.

FIG. 15 is a canonical plot using 21 biomarkers for distinguishing DTPD patients from age-matched normal controls and a summary of results using 21 or 57 biomarkers for distinguishing DTPD patients from age-matched normal controls

FIG. 16 is a schematic representation of the results of a stepwise linear discriminant analysis for distinguishing DTPD patients from DTAD patients and a summary of results using 57 or 27 biomarkers to distinguish DTPD patients from DTAD patients.

FIG. 17 illustrates the sensitivity of distinguishing DTAD patients from age-matched normal controls using biomarkers selected by a stepwise linear discriminant analysis versus using biomarkers that were not selected by discriminant analysis.

FIG. 18 illustrates that the sensitivity of distinguishing DTAD patients from normal age-matched controls was essentially independent of the severity of the patients' symptoms.

FIG. 19 shows the multivariate linear discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of the probabilities of diagnosing drug treated AD patient samples (DTAD) and drug treated PD patient samples (DTPD).

FIG. 20 shows the multivariate linear 3 way discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of DTAD vs. DTPD vs. normal age-matched controls and for DTAD vs. Not DTAD, where Not DTAD includes DTPD patients and normal age-matched controls.

FIG. 21 shows a comparative statistical Dot, Box and Whiskers graph of the concentration of Apolipoprotein E4 protein in blood serum of drug treated AD patients, drug treated PD patients, and age-matched normal controls.

FIG. 22 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 57 serum biomarkers in Apo E4(+) DTAD, DTPD, and age-matched normal controls.

FIG. 23 shows the serum concentration as the median fold of mean standard normal concentration of 57 serum biomarkers in Apo E4(−) DTAD, DTPD, and age-matched normal controls.

FIG. 24 shows the multivariate linear 3 way discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of Apo E4(+) DTAD vs. DTPD vs. normal age-matched controls.

FIG. 25 shows the multivariate linear 3 way discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of Apo E4(−) DTAD vs. DTPD vs. normal age-matched controls.

FIG. 26 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of a method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease and a summary of results of a linear discriminate analysis of Apo E4 (+) DTAD patients vs. DTPD patients vs. age-matched normal controls, a linear discriminate analysis of Apo E4 (−) DTAD patients vs. DTPD patients vs. age-matched normal controls, and a combined 3 way linear discriminate analysis of the Apo E4(+) and ApoE4(−) DTAD vs. DTPD vs. age-matched normal controls.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention include screening and diagnostic tests for differentiating individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in drug treated patients and in drug naïve patients. Patients with AD are differentiated from patients without AD, and from patients with AD-Like disorders that express symptoms like AD. The method is based on the use of 2-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis to separate the complex mixture of proteins found in blood serum and the quantitation of a group of identified biomarkers to differentiate patients having AD from patients having other AD-Like disorders.

In the context of the present invention, the “protein expression profile” corresponds to the steady state level of the various proteins in biological samples that can be expressed quantitatively.

In the context of the present invention, a “biomarker” corresponds to a protein or protein fragment present in a biological sample from a patient, wherein the quantity of the biomarker in the biological sample provides information about whether the patient exhibits an altered biological state such as AD or an AD-Like disorder.

The method of the present invention is based on the quantification of specified proteins. Preferably the proteins are separated and identified by 2D gel electrophoresis as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

2D gel electrophoresis has been used in research laboratories for biomarker discovery since the 1970's (Orrick, L. R. et al. 1973. Proc. Natl. Sci. U.S.A. 70:13 16-1320; Goldknopf, I. L. et al. 1975. J. Biol Chem. 250:71282-7187; O'Farrell, P. et al. 1975. J. Biol. Chem. May 250:4007-4021; Anderson, L. and Anderson, N. G. 1977. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:5421-5425; Goldknopf, I. L. and Busch, H.1977. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:864-868). In the past, this method has been considered highly specialized, labor intensive and non-reproducible.

Only recently with the advent of integrated supplies, robotics, and software combined with bioinformatics has progression of this proteomics technique in the direction of diagnostics become feasible. The promise and utility of 2D gel electrophoresis is based on its ability to detect changes in protein expression and to discriminate protein isoforms that arise due to variations in amino acid sequence and/or post-synthetic protein modifications such as phosphorylation, nitrosylation, ubiquitination, conjugation with ubiquitin-Like proteins, acetylation, and glycosylation. These are important variables in cell regulatory processes involved in disease states.

There are few comparable alternatives to 2D gels for tracking changes in protein expression patterns related to disease progression. The introduction of high sensitivity fluorescent staining, digital image processing and computerized image analysis has greatly amplified and simplified the detection of unique species and the quantification of proteins. By using known protein standards as landmarks within, each gel run, computerized analysis can detect unique differences in protein expression and modifications between two samples from the same individual or between several individuals.

Subjects

Patients and age-matched controls were from three clinical sites (1) Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; (2) Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, Ariz., USA, and (3) University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece. The number of serum samples investigated from patients and controls are listed in Table 1.

The study compared biomarker concentrations in serum samples of healthy participants and those with neurodegenerative diseases in the initial biomarker panel identification (site 1), and with healthy participants and those with AD and PD in the extended investigation of the panel (sites 2 and 3). AD and PD patients underwent clinical evaluation to provide clinical data, including the severity of AD and PD symptoms. The severity of AD was recorded according to the MMSE score, and the severity of PD was measured according to the Hoehn and Yahr Scale and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for AD and PD patients are listed in Tables 2 and 3. Patient information provided included demographics and medical history. Evaluation of clinical signs of PD included rigidity (stiffness or inflexibility of limbs and joints), bradykinesia/akinesia (slowness of movement/absence of movement), tremor (involuntary, regular rhythmic shaking of the limb, the head, the mouth, the tongue or the entire body) and postural instability (coordination and impaired balance). Also evaluated were the history of past illness, patients' current health problems, and copies of conventional imaging (CAT, PET scans, MRI of brain, SPECT, etc). All forms and copies of reports were identified by study number only in order to maintain confidentiality; a copy of the above mentioned medical information was sent to the testing site in accordance with Health Information Privacy concerns.

Separation and Image Analysis of Proteins in Patient Samples

Sample preparation and electrophoresis were performed essentially as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated in its entirety by reference. The first dimension electrophoresis (100 μg of serum proteins/gel) was on immobilized 11 cm IEF strips (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules Calif.), pH 5-8, and the second dimension was on pre-cast 8-16% acrylamide gradient CRITERION SDS-gels (Bio-Rad).

TABLE 1
Prospective banked and prospective
newly drawn patients and controls
Blood Serum	Total No.
Sample Type	of Patients£	Disease Status
Prospective Banked	44	Alzheimer's disease (DNAD)
Samples of Drug	29	Parkinson's disease (DNPD)
Naïve (DN) Patients	24	AD/PD-like and Mixed (DNADL)†
and controls¥	75	AD/PD Age-matched Normal
		Controls
	136	Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
		(DNALS)
	33	ALS-like (DNALSL)‡
	57	ALS Age-matched Normal Controls
Prospective Newly	39	Alzheimer's disease (DTAD)
Drawn Samples of	62	Parkinson's disease (DTPD)
Drug Treated (DT)	78	AD/PD Age-matched Normal
Patients and		Controls
Controls§
†AD/PD-like disorders including Frontotemporal dementia; Lewy body dementia; Vascular (Multi-infarct) dementia; Alcohol related dementia; Semantic dementia; Stroke (CVA); Post-irradiation Encephalopathy and Seizures; Vascular (Multi-infarct) parkinsonism; Multiple system atrophy; Essential tremor; Corticalbasal ganglionic degeneration; and mixed disorders including Alzheimer's disease combined with Vascular (Multi-infarct) dementia; Alzheimer's disease combined with Lewy body dementia; Parkinson's disease combined with Lewy body dementia; Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease combined with Lewy body dementia; Frontotemporal dementia combined with Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; and Thalamic CVA combined with HX of Lung CA.
‡Non-ALS disorders of motor neurons, muscles, nerves, and spinal cord.
¥From Houston, TX, USA.
§From Thessaly, Greece and Sun City, AZ, USA
£This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Baylor College of Medicine and the Banner Sun Health Research Institute and the Ethics Committee of the University of Thessaly, with written informed consent. Subjects were evaluated by neurologists Katerina Markopoulou, MD, PhD, the University of Thessaly, Greece; Marwan Sabbagh, MD and Holly Shill, MD, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA, and Stanley H. Appel, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

TABLE 2
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and controls
for prospective clinical validation with newly drawn samples in real time.
Inclusions:	Exclusions:
1.	Age: 55-90 Both men and women in all	1.	Significant neurologic disease other than
	ethnic groups		Alzheimer's disease including Parkinson's
2.	MMSE: 12-26; CDR: 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0.		disease, multi-infarct dementia,
3.	Permitted medications stable for at least 4		Huntington's disease, normal pressure
	weeks prior to screening.		hydrocephalus, brain tumor, progressive
4.	Antidepressants with no significant		supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder,
	anticholinergic side effects if they are not		subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or
	currently depressed and no history of major		history of significant head trauma followed
	depression within the past 2 years		by persistent neurologic defaults or known
5.	Estrogen replacement therapy is		structural brain abnormalities.
	discouraged	2.	Evidence of infection, infarction, or other
6.	Gingko biloba is permissible, but		focal lesions. Subjects with multiple
	discouraged		lacunes or lacunes in a critical memory
7.	Washout from psychoactive medication,		structure are excluded.
	e.g., excluded anti-depressants,	3.	Presence of pacemakers, aneurysm clips,
	neuroleptics, chronic anxiolytics or		artificial heart valves, ear implants, metal
	sedative hypnotics, etc., for at least 4 weeks		fragments or foreign objects in the eyes,
	prior to screening.		skin or body.
8.	Cholinesterase permitted	4.	History of alcohol or substance abuse or
9.	Good general health, no additional diseases		dependence within the past 2 years (DSM
	that interfere with study.		IV criteria).
10.	Not pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing	5.	Any significant systemic illness or unstable
	potential, i.e. two years post-menopausal or		medical condition which could lead to
	surgically sterile.		difficulty complying with the protocol.
11.	Willing to provide serum for biomarker	6.	Current use of specific psychoactive
	studies at protocol specified time points		medications (e.g., certain antidepressants,
	(optional).		neuroleptics, chronic anxiolytics or
12.	Completed 6 grades of education or good		sedative hypnotics, etc.).
	work history sufficient to exclude mental
	retardation.
13.	Fluent in English or Spanish.

TABLE 3
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for Parkinson's disease
(PD) patients and controls for prospective clinical
validation with newly drawn samples in real time
Inclusions:	Exclusions:
1.	Male or female >50 years old	1.	Secondary parkinsonism
2.	Fully understood informed consent		(Non-PD)
3.	Controls:	2.	Vascular parkinsonism
4.	Healthy	3.	Encephalitis
5.	No family history of Parkinson's	4.	Exposure to neuroleptics
6.	Disease subjects:	5.	Dementia (MMSE <25)
7.	At least three signs of PD	6.	Gaze palsy
	a. resting tremor	7.	Amyotrophy
	b. bradykinesia	8.	Cerebellar signs
	c. rigidity	9.	Symptomatic orthostatic
	d. postural instability		hypotension (mean arterial
8.	Responsive to levodopa or		pressure drop >20 mm Hg,
	dopamine agonists		recumbent to standing)
		10.	Unstable medical condition
		11.	History of alcohol or
			substance abuse
		12.	Major depression (Hamilton
			score >19). History
			of malignant melanoma.

The gels were stained and analyzed essentially as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated in its entirety by reference. Basically, the gels were stained with SyproRuby™ (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and the fluorescent digital images of the gels were captured (FLA 7000 Imager Fujifilm; FX Imager, Bio-Rad Laboratories), and protein spot detection and quantitation performed (PDQUESTTM, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Spot quantities in parts per million (PPM) fluorescent pixel spot density were normalized to total gel density. Each serum sample was analyzed in duplicate or triplicate. Quantitation of individual spots was validated for linearity, dynamic range, limit of detection (LOD=0.66 μg/ml of serum), limit of quantify ability (LOQ=6.6 μg/ml of serum), reproducibility, and robusmess (CV≧20%).

The 2D gel patterns of age-matched normal controls were compared with each other and with the blood serum samples from the patients with neurological disease as listed in Table 1 from three clinical sites. Specifically, prospectively banked drug naïve patients and age matched controls from site 1 were compared with each other and then further compared to the prospectively newly drawn samples of drug treated patients and controls from sites 2 and 3.

The Isolation and Identification of the Protein Spots

Following differential expression analysis, the blood serum concentrations of fifty seven proteins were found to be of interest (FIG. 1). These protein spots were carefully excised, in-gel digested with trypsin, and subjected to mass fingerprinting/sequence analysis by high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

Peptide fragmentation patterns were obtained from the tryptic in-gel digests of the protein spots and the patterns were subjected to public database searches using the GenBank and dbEST databases maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (hereinafter referred to as the NCBI database). Those of skill in the art are familiar with searching databases, like the NCBI database. The NCBI database search results were displayed with the best matched amino acid sequences of the identified peptides and the protein accession number of the protein sequence they were derived from.

Biostatistical Analysis

Statistical significance of differences in individual biomarker blood serum concentrations (as Fold of Standard Normal Mean Concentration) between patient and controls was determined by non-parametric Dot Box and Whiskers (medians), analysis of variance, and parametric Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis using Analyze-it®″ (Analyse-it Software, Ltd., United Kingdom) imbedded in Microsoft XL. Analysis of joint performance of groups of biomarkers was by multivariate linear discriminant analysis using SAS® statistical software as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated in its entirety by reference.

Box and Whisker plots (such as FIG. 11) give a visual representation of non-parametric descriptive statistics. The central “box” represents the distance between the first and third quartiles (inter quartile range or IQR), with the median marked as the horizontal line inside the box. The notch in the box represent the 95% confidence interval around the median (the 50th percentile); thus groups that display non-overlapping notches can be considered statistically different (p<0.05). The minimum value is the origin of the leading “whisker” and the maximum value is the limit of the trailing “whisker”. All values are plotted individually (Dots) and those values outside the whiskers are considered possible outliers, presented either as circle (far outlier) or plus sign (near outliers).

The diagnostic performance of a test or the accuracy of a test to discriminate diseased cases from normal cases is evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. ROC curves can also be used to compare the diagnostic performance of two or more laboratory or diagnostic tests. In an ROC curve the true positive rate (Sensitivity) is plotted in function of the false positive rate (1—Specificity) for different cut-off points. Each point on the ROC plot represents a sensitivity/specificity pair corresponding to a particular decision threshold. A test with perfect discrimination (no overlap in the two distributions) has a ROC plot that passes through the upper left corner (100% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Therefore the closer the ROC plot is to the upper left corner, the higher the overall accuracy of the test.

Results

Drug Naïve Alzheimer's Disease Patient Samples. Alzheimer's Disease-Like Patients, and Age-Matched Normal Controls

Significantly different serum concentration profiles were obtained with 47 serum protein biomarkers when prospectively collected banked serum samples from 44 drug naïve patients with Alzheimer's disease (DNAD) were compared to 151 age-matched normal controls (FIG. 2).

The serum protein biomarker spots monitored in this analysis were selected by exhaustive and painstaking comparisons of quantitative 2D gel images like that shown in FIG. 1. After the examination of the patient/control 2D gels and a biostatistical analysis of the concentrations of selected protein spots (e.g., the median fold of standard average normal PPM pixel spot densities), forty seven biomarkers were selected for discriminating drug naïve neurodegenerative disease patients and controls.

The selected proteins exhibited reproducible statistically significant disease specific abnormal serum concentrations, measured as differences between different neurodegenerative disease patient groups and normal and disease controls as described is U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/217,885 filed Jul. 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.

The individual protein molecular entities resolved as spots were identified and characterized by peptide LC MS/MS profiles of spot in-gel trypsin digests and the amino acid sequence spans of the identified tryptic peptides were best-fit matched to the apparent protein spot molecular weights and isoelectric points from the 2D gels, and in some, cases, N-terminal sequencing was also performed.

The identified biomarker proteins were clustered by function into five groups: Group I, Cellular degeneration related proteins; Group II, Haptoglobin protein isoforms involved in extracellular oxidative stress; Group III, Cellular and humeral inflammatory proteins; Group IV, Transport proteins; and Group V, unknown function (see Table 4).

As show in FIG. 2, the serum protein concentration profile of the 44 drug naïve Alzheimer's disease patients diverged significantly from that of the 151 age-matched normal controls. When multivariate statistics on the concentrations of the 47 proteins were obtained by linear discriminant analysis as shown in FIG. 3, a 3-way discrimination was obtained between 44 patients with drug nave Alzheimer's disease vs. 26 patients with drug naïve non-AD AD-like disorders exhibiting Alzheimer's disease-like symptoms (Sensitivity=93.2%). The non-AD AD-like disorders included 12 AD-like PD patients, 7 Lewy body and mixed Lewy body dementia patients, 4 stroke-related and mixed stroke-related dementia patients, 3 Frontotemporal and mixed Frontotemporal dementia patients. The combined discrimination of AD patients from non-AD samples had a specificity of 92.2%, where Not AD included the non-AD AD-like disorders and the 151 age-matched normal controls.

Stepwise multivariate linear discriminant analysis selected 35 proteins as those providing optimal complementary discrimination between AD and Not AD (see Table 5).

The serum protein concentration profile of the overall group of 26 AD-like patients showed significant differences from that of the 44 AD patients and the 151 age-matched normal controls (FIGS. 3 and 8), and the corresponding profiles of the AD-like subgroups were even more divergent from AD, age-matched normal controls and from each other (FIGS. 4-7).

The protein biomarkers used to discriminate between the AD patients, the AD-like patients and the normal controls include: Apolipoprotein E3, Poly-ADP-ribosyl-A24 (monoubiquitinyl-Histone H2A), Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein A-IV, Alcohol Dehydrogenase H1A3, Apolipoprotein H, Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu5-5, Clusterin 1, Fidgitin I, Fidgitin II, α-1-microglobulin, α-2-Macroglobulin, Lectin 3 P35, Transthyretin “Dimer”, Pre-serum Amyloid Protein, Haptoglobin HP-1a, Haptoglobin HP-1b, Haptoglobin HP-1c, Haptoglobin HP-1d, Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein, Haptoglobin Related Protein HP-RP, Complement C3c1a, Complement C3c1b, Complement C3c1c, Complement C3c2a, Complement C3c2b, Complement C3dg, Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein, Complement Factor I, Complement Factor H/Hs, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Cytolysis Protein, Hemopexin, Albumin PRO2044-I, Albumen PRO2675, Inter-α-trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4) Related 35 KD Protein, Albumin PRO2044-II, Albumin, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-I, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-II, Similar to Albumin, Transferrin I, Transferrin II, Immunoglobulin Igκ1, and Immunoglobulin Igκc.

Drug Treated Alzheimer's Disease Patient Samples, Parkinson's Disease Patients, and Age-Matched Normal Controls

As shown in FIGS. 9 and 11, the corresponding profile for the prospectively collected newly drawn drug treated AD patient samples (DTAD, n=39) was very different from that of the prospectively collected and banked drug naïve AD patient samples (DNAD, n=44). The medication profile of the patients from the prospectively collected newly drawn AD patient samples (DTAD, n=39) is shown in FIG. 10.

TABLE 4
Protein Spot Identities:
Group I: Proteins of Cellular Degeneration
N3314: Apolipoprotein E3	N6306: Poly-ADP-ribosyl-A24 (monoubiquitinyl-
	Histone H2A)
¥N3319: Pre-Apolipoprotein E3	¥N7007: Nucleoporin 188
N5302: Apolipoprotein E4	¥N2412: Apoptosis Inhibitor AIM-CD5
N2502: Apolipoprotein A-IV	N5705: Alcohol Dehydrogenase H1A3
N7606: Apolipoprotein H	N5304: Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu5-5
N1406: Clusterin 1	N8301: Fidgitin I
N1308: α-1-microglobulin	N6214: Fidgitin II
N6402: α-2-Macroglobulin	N5303: Lectin 3 P35
N3307: Transthyretin “Dimer”	N3209: Pre-serum Amyloid Protein
¥N3007 Transthyretin Huntingtin Interacting Protein E
Group II: Haptoglobin Proteins
Haptoglobin Proteins:
N1514: HP-1a	N2401: HP-1b
N2407: HP-1c	N3409: HP-1d
¥N2309: HP-1e
N5123: Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein
N4402: Haptoglobin Related Protein HP-RP
Group III: Inflammatory Proteins
Complement C3 Proteins:
N7310: C3c1a	N7208: C3c1b	N7410: C3c1c
N9311: C3c2a	N9312: C3c2b	N1511: C3dg
N7304: Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein
Complement Factors:
N1416: I N4411: H/Hs	N7616: Bb
N1506: Complement Cytolysis Protein
N6519: Hemopexin
N2307: Inter-α-trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4) Related 35 KD Protein
Immunoglobulins:
N6224: Igκl	N5319: Igκc
Group IV: Transfer proteins
N2511: ALB PRO2044-I	N3417: ALB PRO2675
N4325: ALB PRO2044-II	N4517: Alb Protein
N5514: Mutant Chain A R218H-I
N4420: Mutant Chain A R218H-II
N5315: Similar to Albumin
N7405: Transferrin I
N8307: Transferrin II
Group V: Function Unknown
N4130: X2	¥N5515: X1	¥N1319: X6
N6321: X5	¥N7505: X7	¥N8221: X8
¥10 additional protein spots, Bio-mined for DTAD and DTPD

TABLE 5
This analysis uses 47 biomarkers, ad vs adl vs control
The STEPDISC Procedure
Stepwise Selection Summary
							Average
							Squared
		Partial			Wilks'	Pr <	Canonical	Pr >
Step	Label	R-Square	F Value	Pr > F	Lambda	Lambda	Correlation	ASCC
1	N4130	0.3781	183.88	<.0001	0.621937	<.0001	0.18903148	<.0001
2	N7606	0.351	163.32	<.0001	0.403644	<.0001	0.36409755	<.0001
3	N1511	0.2649	108.67	<.0001	0.296703	<.0001	0.44945096	<.0001
4	N3314	0.1762	64.38	<.0001	0.244423	<.0001	0.49575635	<.0001
5	N6321	0.1173	39.95	<.0001	0.215742	<.0001	0.52604052	<.0001
6	N8301	0.0711	22.95	<.0001	0.200408	<.0001	0.54291252	<.0001
7	N7310	0.0581	18.46	<.0001	0.188771	<.0001	0.55594225	<.0001
8	N7410	0.057	18.07	<.0001	0.178013	<.0001	0.56981004	<.0001
9	N6306	0.0428	13.36	<.0001	0.170389	<.0001	0.58037414	<.0001
10	N5304	0.0467	14.6	<.0001	0.162428	<.0001	0.59073474	<.0001
11	N5514	0.0359	11.08	<.0001	0.156597	<.0001	0.59864879	<.0001
12	N4402	0.0278	8.48	0.0002	0.152251	<.0001	0.60491478	<.0001
13	N2407	0.0275	8.37	0.0003	0.148069	<.0001	0.61113503	<.0001
14	N4325	0.0288	8.78	0.0002	0.143803	<.0001	0.61752281	<.0001
15	N5315	0.0391	12.03	<.0001	0.13818	<.0001	0.62507682	<.0001
16	N6315	0.0279	8.48	0.0002	0.134318	<.0001	0.63017534	<.0001
17	N7304	0.0294	8.91	0.0002	0.130375	<.0001	0.63564981	<.0001
18	N5302	0.0213	6.4	0.0018	0.127598	<.0001	0.63903925	<.0001
19	N2502	0.0213	6.4	0.0018	0.124875	<.0001	0.64251146	<.0001
20	N9311	0.0155	4.63	0.0102	0.122934	<.0001	0.64541416	<.0001
21	N3417	0.0169	5.03	0.0068	0.120854	<.0001	0.64865582	<.0001
22	N6214	0.0153	4.55	0.0109	0.119	<.0001	0.651429	<.0001
23	N7616	0.0143	4.22	0.0151	0.117301	<.0001	0.65419534	<.0001
24	N3307	0.014	4.13	0.0165	0.115658	<.0001	0.65631134	<.0001
25	N7208	0.0105	3.09	0.0463	0.114441	<.0001	0.65785918	<.0001
26	N6224	0.0117	3.42	0.0333	0.113107	<.0001	0.65963436	<.0001
27	N2307	0.0106	3.1	0.0457	0.111907	<.0001	0.66126359	<.0001
28	N6402	0.0092	2.69	0.0688	0.110875	<.0001	0.6629722	<.0001
29	N5303	0.0078	2.26	0.1052	0.110013	<.0001	0.66412334	<.0001
30	N3209	0.007	2.03	0.1324	0.109243	<.0001	0.66519786	<.0001
31	N2401	0.0079	2.29	0.1019	0.108379	<.0001	0.66631173	<.0001
32	N5123	0.0076	2.21	0.1106	0.107551	<.0001	0.6673879	<.0001
33	N9312	0.0076	2.19	0.1125	0.106734	<.0001	0.66858606	<.0001
34	N1406	0.0074	2.13	0.1203	0.105946	<.0001	0.66960306	<.0001
35	N6519	0.007	2.01	0.1344	0.105815	<.0001	0.66992024	<.0001

When the concentration of drug treated patient serum samples were compared to the corresponding concentrations of these proteins in samples from drug naïve AD patient samples, a divergence in the serum concentrations of several proteins were noted.

Proteins involved in cellular degeneration (Group I), such as Apolipoproteins E4, E3, and A-IV, Transthyretin “dimer”, α-2 Macroglobulin, Glutathione-S-transferase Mu5-5, and Fidgitin I were less divergent from the age matched normal controls, while Apolipoprotein H and α-1 microglobulin, were divergent from the controls in the opposite direction with elevated levels vs. reduced levels in drug naïve patient samples.

Five of the haptoglobin proteins (i.e., Haptoglobin HP 2A; and Haptoglobin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d) involved in extra cellular and systemic oxidative stress response (Group II) had an elevated level vs. a reduced level in drug naïve patient samples; while the concentration of the Haptoglobin related protein was reduced. All of the Haptoglobin proteins were more divergent from the age matched normal controls than the corresponding proteins from drug naïve patient samples.

Proteins involved in humeral and cellular immune inflammatory responses (Group III) showed the most pronounced differences in concentrations between the drug treated AD patients and the drug naïve AD patients as well as control samples. For example, the DTAD patients exhibited markedly reduced levels of Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain (H4) related 35 KD protein, Complement C3c1a, C3c1c, C3c2a, C3dg, and Factor Bb. In contrast, all of these proteins were substantially elevated in drug naïve patient samples. There were additional divergences in elevated levels of Immunoglobulins κ light chainiκc, and the Complement cytolysis inhibitor protein α-subunit vs. reduced levels in drug naïve patient samples, an elevated level of Complement Factor I vs. no change in level in drug naïve patient samples, and a less elevated level of Complement Factor H/Hs protein than in drug naïve patient samples.

Also divergent were three additional transport proteins (Group IV) and one of the two proteins of unknown function (X).

The marked differences between DNAD and DTAD were also seen in combination by multivariate linear discriminate analysis and receiver operator characteristics of the probabilities of diagnosis obtained (ROC), employing the combined concentrations of the 47 biomarkers to discriminate between prospectively collected and banked drug naïve AD patient samples (DNAD, n=44) vs. prospectively collected newly drawn AD patient samples from the clinical validation trial (DTAD, n=39), which showed a sensitivity of 95.5% for drug naïve AD and specificity of 96.1% for the group of clinical validation trial AD samples (DNAD vs. DTAD, FIG. 11).

Due to the markedly reduced divergence from normal of the prospectively collected newly drawn DTAD patient samples from the clinical validation trial from the age-matched normal controls, additional protein biomarkers were required for use in discriminant analysis to provide sufficient differential diagnostic discrimination of DTAD from age-matched normal and disease controls.

In addition, for drug treated disease controls 56 serum samples from Parkinson's disease patients, all of whom had been treated with dopamine agonists (therefore designated drug treated Parkinson's disease patients, DTPD), were investigated. Single biomarker concentration statistics of those patient samples combined with the existing 39 DTAD and 78 age-matched normal control samples from the two trials led to the identification of an additional ten serum protein biomarkers, which were then added to the multivariate discriminant analysis.

The profiles of the concentrations of the 57 serum proteins listed in Table 4 in prospectively collected newly drawn samples from the clinical validation trial from the DTAD, DTPD and age-matched normal controls were significantly different from one-another (FIG. 12).

Stepwise linear discriminant analysis selected a combination of 33 of the 57 proteins as optimal to distinguish DTAD patients from controls (Sensitivity 96.7%, Specificity 100%) (see FIGS. 13-14, Table 6). A combination of 21 of the 57 proteins (including 12 of the 33 selected for DTAD vs. Control, see Table 7) were selected as optimal to distinguish DTPD patients from controls (Sensitivity 93.3%, Specificity 92.9%) (see FIGS. 13 and 15).

In addition, stepwise linear discriminant analysis selected a combination of 27 of the 57 proteins (including 13 of those selected for DTAD vs. Control, and 8 of the 21 selected for DTPD vs. Control, see Table 8) as optimal to distinguish DTAD patients from DTPD patients (Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 100%) (see FIGS. 16 and 19).

The sensitivity of distinguishing DTAD from age-matched normal controls using biomarkers selected by a stepwise linear discriminant analysis, over using biomarkers that were not selected, is shown in FIG. 17. Furthermore, the sensitivity of distinguishing DTAD from normal age-matched controls was essentially independent of the severity of the patients' symptoms (FIG. 18).

When multivariate discriminant analysis was performed by linear discriminant analysis (FIG. 20), employing the concentrations of 57 of these proteins, 3-way discrimination was obtained between 39 DTAD patients (Sensitivity=87.2%), 56 DTPD patients, and 78 age-matched normal controls (Combined specificity for Not AD=87.2%, Not AD=DTPD+age-matched normal controls).

Apo E4 Protein and AD Diagnosis

Apo E4 protein spot N5302 was the first protein selected by stepwise multivariate linear discriminant as providing the highest statistical contribution to AD diagnosis as compared to age-matched normal controls (Tables 6).

To investigate this further, the patients and controls were stratified into those patients with or without detectable amounts of the E4 protein in their sera. Upon stratification, significant differences in abnormal levels of the biomarkers were seen in the serum profiles of the Apo E4(+) DTAD and DTPD patients and the age-matched normal controls vs. Apo E4(−) patients and controls (FIGS. 22-23).

Furthermore, when multivariate linear discriminant analysis was employed on the stratified populations to discriminate DTAD vs. DTPD and age-matched normal controls (collectively Not-DTAD), those with detectable quantities of Apo E4 protein (with Apo E4(+) sera) were classified into DTAD and Not-DTAD with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% (FIG. 24), whereas those without detectable quantities of Apo E4 protein (with Apo E4(−) sera) were classified into DTAD and Not DTAD with a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 88.8% (FIG. 25).

When the results of separate discriminant functions were tabulated by patient and combined, the overall sensitivity for DTAD was 97.4% and the overall specificity for Not DTAD was 95.7% (FIG. 26). In addition, stepwise linear discriminant analysis selected 20 proteins for Apo E4 (+) (Table 10), and 22 proteins for Apo E4 (−) (Table 11) as being optimally Complimentary for discriminating between DTAD and Not DTAD, with only 8 of the 47 proteins in common to both Apo E4(+) and Apo E4(−) linear discriminant functions (Table 9).

Thus, monitoring the concentrations of specified groups of serum proteins for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease patients, employing the concentrations of 57 serum proteins, and by using an initial separation of patients and normal and disease controls on the basis of detection or lack of detection in serum of Apolipoprotein E4 (the protein coded for by the high risk gene allele Apo E ε4 provided enhanced discrimination of drug treated patients with Alzheimer's disease (Sensitivity=97.4%) from those with Parkinson's disease and age-matched normal controls (Specificity=95.7%).

These results provide a basis of a blood test for differential diagnosis by a specialist, such as a neurologist or psychiatrist, of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease who are already under treatment with anti dementia drugs, including donepezil, rivastigmine, memantine HCl, or the combination thereof. Such a test will be useful in the present clinical setting where by the time a neurologist sees a patient with suspected Alzheimer's disease, the patient is often already under treatment with one of these FDA approved anti-dementia drugs.

In addition, the significant differences in the serum protein profiles of Apo E4(+) and Apo E4(−) patients lends support to the concept that Apolipoprotein E4 confers differences in normal physiology, as well as in disease mechanisms, and in drug responses.

Implications for Differential Diagnosis

Embodiments of the present invention monitor the concentration (i.e., the up regulation or down regulation) of specified groups of serum proteins for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease patients.

Embodiment 1

A screening/diagnostic assay for drug naïve AD patients is described that quantitates the serum concentration of 47 specific serum proteins in order to distinguish drug naïve Alzheimer's patients (Sensitivity=93.2%) from a group of drug naïve disease controls with AD-like Parkinson's disease, non-Alzheimer's and mixed dementias, and age-matched normal controls (Specificity=92.2%). Likewise, the assay can distinguish drug naïve AD patients from drug treated AD patients (Sensitivity=95.5%, Specificity=96.1%).

TABLE 6
Stepwise Multivariate Discriminant Selection Summary DTAD vs. Control
							Average
		Partial					Squared
		R-			Wilks'	Pr <	Canonical	Pr >
Step	Biomarker	Square	F Value	Pr > F	Lambda	Lambda	Correlation	ASCC	Protein Spot	Protein ID
1	N5302	0.0793	10.34	0.0017	0.92065	0.0017	0.0793489	0.0017	1. N5302 Apo E4	Apolipoprotein
										E4
2	N9312	0.0735	9.44	0.0026	0.853	<.0001	0.1470038	<.0001	2. N9312 C3c2b	Complement
										C3c2b
3	N5123	0.0563	7.03	0.0091	0.80501	<.0001	0.1949885	<.0001	3. N5123 HP-2A	Haptoglobin
										HP-2a Protein
4	N7304	0.058	7.21	0.0083	0.7583	<.0001	0.2416984	<.0001	4. N7304 C4bg	Complement
										C4b Gamma
										Chain Protein
5	N3409	0.0473	5.76	0.018	0.72246	<.0001	0.2775439	<.0001	5. N3409 HP-1d	Haptoglobin
										HP-1d
6	N7606	0.0378	4.51	0.0358	0.69518	<.0001	0.3048175	<.0001	6. N7606 Apo H	Apolipoprotein H
7	N5303	0.0445	5.31	0.023	0.66423	<.0001	0.3357739	<.0001	7. N5303 L3 P35	Lectin 3 P35
8	N7505	0.0282	3.28	0.0729	0.64551	<.0001	0.354494	<.0001	8. N7505 X8	X7
9	N5705	0.0312	3.61	0.0601	0.62537	<.0001	0.3746291	<.0001	9. N5705 ADH1A3	Aldehyde
										Dehydrogenase
										1 A3
10	N3209	0.0354	4.08	0.0459	0.60322	<.0001	0.3967816	<.0001	10. N3209 Pre-SAP	Pre-serum
										Amyloid P
11	N1406	0.033	3.75	0.0554	0.58333	<.0001	0.4166656	<.0001	11. N1406 Clrn1	Clusterin
										Isoform 1
12	N3307	0.027	3.02	0.085	0.5676	<.0001	0.4324014	<0001	12. N3307 TT“D”	Transthyretin
										“Dimer” Protein
13	N8221	0.0203	2.23	0.1379	0.55609	<.0001	0.4439074	<.0001	13. N8221 X9	X8
14	N6306	0.0221	2.42	0.1229	0.54381	<.0001	0.4561932	<.0001	14. N6306 PDLaH	Acidic Histone
										H2A Protein
										(PD/LBD)
15	N6321	0.0193	2.09	0.1515	0.53331	<.0001	0.4666922	<.0001	15. N6321 X5	X5
16	N7405	0.019	2.03	0.1567	0.52317	<.0001	0.4768306	<.0001	16. N7405 TTR1	Transferrin
										Protein I
17	N8301	0.05	5.48	0.0212	0.497	<.0001	0.5029991	<.0001	17. N8301 Fidgitin I	Fidgitin Protein I
18	N7310	0.026	2.75	0.1003	0.48407	<.0001	0.5159253	<.0001	18. N7310 C3cla	Complement
										C3c1a
19	N4411	0.0181	1.88	0.1737	0.47533	<.0001	0.5246731	<.0001	19. N4411 Factor	Complement
									H/Hs	Factor H/Hs
										Protein
20	N1416	0.0209	2.15	0.1452	0.4654	<.0001	0.5346019	<.0001	20. N1416 Factor I	Complement
										Factor 1 Protein
21	N1514	0.0382	3.97	0.049	0.44763	<.0001	0.552375	<.0001	21. N1514 HP-1a	Haptoglobin
										HP-1a Protein
22	N5315	0.0207	2.1	0.1508	0.43834	<.0001	0.5616581	<.0001	22. N5315 Sim-Alb	Similar to
										Albumin
23	N2502	0.0284	2.87	0.0937	0.42589	<.0001	0.5741108	<.0001	23. N2502 Apo A-IV	Apolipoprotein
										A-IV Protein
24	N1506	0.0193	1.91	0.1705	0.41768	<.0001	0.5823214	<.0001	24. N1405 Cyp	Complement
										Cytolysis
										Protein
25	N6214	0.0232	2.28	0.1345	0.408	<.0001	0.5920016	<.0001	25. N6214 Fidgitin II	Fidgitin Protein
										II
26	N4402	0.0197	1.91	0.1704	0.39996	<.0001	0.6000355	<.0001	26. N4402 HP-RP	Haptoglobin
										Related Protein
27	N1308	0.0195	1.87	0.1748	0.39217	<.0001	0.6078345	<.0001	27. N1308a-1mg	Alpha-1-
										microglobulin
28	N3314	0.0254	2.42	0.1233	0.38222	<.0001	0.6177762	<.0001	28. N3314 Apo E3	Apolipoprotein
										E3 Protein
29	N2307	0.0233	2.19	0.1421	0.37333	<.0001	0.6266736	<.0001	29. N2307 ITI (H4)	Int-a-tryp Inh
									RP 35 KD	HC (H4) Rel
										35 KD Protein
30	N5304	0.0213	1.98	0.163	0.36538	<.0001	0.6346166	<.0001	30. N5304	Glutathione-
									GSTMu5-5	s-transferase
										Mu 5-5
31	N5514	0.0206	1.89	0.1723	0.35786	<.0001	0.6421422	<.0001	31. N5514 Alb	Chain A
									Mutant R218H-I	Albumin Mutant
										R218H Protein
32	N2412	0.0187	1.69	0.1965	0.35117	<.0001	0.6488252	<.0001	32. N2412 AIM CD-5	Apoptiosis
										Inhibitor
										Scavenger
										Receptor
33	N4517	0.0192	1.72	0.1929	0.34444	<.0001	0.6555642	<.0001	33. N4517 AlbP	Albumin Protein

TABLE 7
Stepwise Multivariate Discriminant Selection Summary DTPD vs. Control
							Average
							Squared
		Partial			Wilks'	Pr <	Canonical
Step	Label	R-Square	F Value	Pr > F	Lambda	Lambda	Correlation	Pr > ASCC	Biomarker	Protein ID
1	N5514	0.1019	26	<.0001	0.8981	<.0001	0.1019	<.0001	N5514	Chain A Albumin
										Mutant R218H
										Protein
2	N5123	0.0594	14.39	0.0002	0.8447	<.0001	0.1553	<.0001	N5123	Haptoglobin HP-2a
										Protein
3	N5515	0.0592	14.3	0.0002	0.7947	<.0001	0.2053	<.0001	N5515	X1 Protein
4	N1416	0.0538	12.86	0.0004	0.7519	<.0001	0.2481	<.0001	N1416	Complement Factor I
										Protein
5	N3314	0.0432	10.16	0.0016	0.7194	<.0001	0.2806	<.0001	N3314	Apolipoprotein E3
										Protein
6	N3307	0.0435	10.18	0.0016	0.6881	<.0001	0.3119	<.0001	N3307	Transthyretin
										“Dimer” Protein
7	N7007	0.0444	10.37	0.0015	0.6576	<.0001	0.3424	<.0001	N7007	Nucleoporin NUP188
										Protein
8	N2407	0.0382	8.82	0.0033	0.6324	<.0001	0.3676	<.0001	N2407	Haptoglobin HP-1
										Protein
9	N2511	0.052	12.13	0.0006	0.5995	<.0001	0.4005	<.0001	N2511	Albumin Protein
										PRO2044
10	N6306	0.0316	7.18	0.0079	0.5806	<.0001	0.4194	<.0001	N6306	PDLaH acidic H2A
										(ADPR/ub/A24)
										Protein
11	N2502	0.0261	5.87	0.0163	0.5654	<.0001	0.4346	<.0001	N2502	Apolipoprotein A-IV
										Protein
12	N3007	0.0291	6.54	0.0113	0.549	<.0001	0.451	<.0001	N3007	Transthyretin HYPE
										Protein
13	N7304	0.0248	5.52	0.0196	0.5353	<.0001	0.4647	<.0001	N7304	Complement C4b
										Gamma Chain Protein
14	N4420	0.0233	5.14	0.0243	0.5229	<.0001	0.4771	<.0001	N4420	Chain A Albumin
										mutant R218H
										Protein
15	N8301	0.0179	3.93	0.0488	0.5135	<.0001	0.4865	<.0001	N8301	Fidgitin Protein 1
16	N6224	0.0159	3.45	0.0646	0.5054	<.0001	0.4946	<.0001	N6224	Immunoglobulin
										Kappa Light Chain
										Protein
17	N4411	0.0173	3.75	0.0543	0.4966	<.0001	0.5034	<.0001	N4411	Complement Factor
										H/Hs Protein
18	N6214	0.0147	3.17	0.1764	0.4893	<.0001	0.5107	<.0001	N6214	Fidgitin Protein II
19	N3417	0.0115	2.46	0.1186	0.4837	<.0001	0.5163	<.0001	N3417	Albumin Protein
										PRO2675 Protein
20	N4130	0.0149	3.17	0.0766	0.4765	<.0001	0.5235	<.0001	N4130	X2 Protein
21	N4402	0.0134	2.83	0.0937	0.4701	<.0001	0.5299	<.0001	N4402	Haptoglobin Related
										Protein

TABLE 8
Stepwise Multivariate Discriminant Selection Summary DTAD vs. DTPD
							Average
		Partial					Squared
		R-	F		Wilks'	Pr <	Canonical	Pr >
Step	Biomarker	Square	Value	Pr > F	Lambda	Lambda	Correlation	ASCC	Protein Spot	Protein ID
1	N7616	0.1846	54.56	<.0001	0.81539065	<.0001	0.18460935	<.0001	1. N7616 Factor	Complement Factor
									Bb	Bb
2	N6224	0.1393	38.83	<.0001	0.70184299	<.0001	0.29815701	<.0001	2. N6224 lgkl	Immunoglobulin
										Kappa Light Chain
										Protein
3	N1308	0.1010	26.86	<.0001	0.63093381	<.0001	0.36906619	<.0001	3. N1308 a-1 mg	Alpha-1-
										microglobulin
4	N5302	0.0724	18.57	<.0001	0.58526715	<.0001	0.41473285	<.0001	4. N5302 Apo	Apolipoprotein E4
									E4
5	N6519	0.0508	12.69	0.0004	0.55553212	<.0001	0.44446788	<.0001	5. N6519 HPX	Hemopexin
6	N5705	0.0421	10.38	0.0015	0.53211910	<.0001	0.46788090	<.0001	6. N5705	Aldehyde
									ADH1A3	Dehydrogenase 1 A3
7	N3417	0.0432	10.62	0.0013	0.50911077	<.0001	0.49088923	<.0001	7. N3417 Alb	Albumin Protein
									PRO2675	PRO2675 Protein
8	N4325	0.0647	16.19	<.0001	0.47615657	<.0001	0.52384343	<.0001	8. N4325	Albumin PR02044 II
									PR02044 II
9	N2307	0.0385	9.33	0.0025	0.45782793	<.0001	0.54217207	<.0001	9. N307 ITI	Int-a-tryp Inh HC
									(H4) RP	(H4) Rel 35 KD
									35 KD	Protein
10	N4130	0.0329	7.90	0.0054	0.44275296	<.0001	0.55724704	<.0001	10. N4130 X2	X2 Protein
11	N4420	0.0357	8.56	0.0038	0.42692668	<.0001	0.57307332	<.0001	11. N4420 Alb	Alb Mutant
									R218H-II	R218H-II
12	N4517	0.0356	8.49	0.0039	0.41173690	<.0001	0.58826310	<.0001	12. N4517 AlbP	Albumin Protein
13	N1406	0.0232	5.44	0.0206	0.40218648	<.0001	0.59781352	<.0001	13. N1406 Clrn1	Clusterin Isoform 1
14	N1416	0.0387	9.17	0.0027	0.38664073	<.0001	0.61335927	<.0001	14. N1416	Complement
									Factor I	Factor I Protein
15	N7304	0.0219	5.09	0.0250	0.37816446	<.0001	0.62183554	<.0001	15. N7304C4bg	Complement C4b
										Gamma Chain
										Protein
16	N7505	0.0201	4.64	0.0323	0.37055440	<.0001	0.62944560	<.0001	16. N7505 X7	X7 Protein
17	N5319	0.0188	4.31	0.0389	0.36358267	<.0001	0.63641733	<.0001	17. N5319 lkc	Immunoglobulin
										Kappa C Region
										Protein
18	N1511	0.0156	3.55	0.0607	0.35790265	<.0001	0.64209735	<.0001	18. N1511 C3dg	Complement C3dg
19	N6321	0.0171	3.89	0.0498	0.35176474	<.0001	0.64823526	<.0001	19. N6321X5	X5 Protein
20	N7405	0.0242	5.50	0.0199	0.34326708	<.0001	0.65673292	<.0001	20. N7405 TTR1	Transferrin Protein I
21	N1514	0.0185	4.18	0.0422	0.33690041	<.0001	0.66309959	<.0001	21. N1514 HP-1a	Haptoglobin HP-1a
										Protein
22	N3319	0.0171	3.83	0.0517	0.33114133	<.0001	0.66885867	<.0001	22. N3319	Pro-Apolipoprotein
									Pre-Apo E3	E3
23	N7007	0.0116	2.56	0.1108	0.32731016	<.0001	0.67268984	<.0001	23. N7007 NUP	Nucleoporin NUP
									188	188 Protein
24	N7208	0.0095	2.09	0.1495	0.32419852	<.0001	0.67580148	<.0001	24. N7208 C3c1b	Complement C3c1b
25	N7410	0.0118	2.59	0.1087	0.32036834	<.0001	0.67963166	<.0001	25. N7410 C3c1c	Complement C3c1c
26	N5515	0.0164	3.60	0.0592	0.31511839	<.0001	0.68488161	<.0001	26. N5515 X1	X1 Protein
27	N9312	0.0125	2.72	0.1004	0.31117786	<.0001	0.68882214	<.0001	27. N9312 C3c2b	Complement C3c2b

TABLE 9
Biomarkers Selected by Stepwise Discriminant analysis for
DTAD vs. Control, DTPD vs. Control and DTAD vs DTPD¥
1.	Apolipoprotein E4	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (4)
2.	Complement C3c2b	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (27)
3.	Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (2)
4.	Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (13)	AD/PD (15)
5.	Haptoglobin HP-1d	AD/Ctrl
6.	Apolipoprotein H	AD/Ctrl
7.	Lectin 3 P35	AD/Ctrl
8.	X7	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (16)
9.	Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 A3	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (6)
10.	Pre-serum Amyloid P	AD/Ctrl
11.	Clusterin Isoform 1	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (13)
12.	Transthyretin “Dimer” Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (6)
13.	X8	AD/Ctrl
14.	Acidic Histone H2A Protein (PD/LBD)	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (10)
15.	X5	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (19)
16.	Transferrin Protein I	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (20)
17.	Fidgitin Protein I	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (15)
18.	Complement C3c1a	AD/Ctrl
19.	Complement Factor H/Hs Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (17)
20.	Complement Factor I Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (4)	AD/PD (14)
21.	Haptoglobin HP-1a Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (21)
22.	Similar to Albumin	AD/Ctrl
23.	Apolipoprotein A-IV Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (11)
24.	Complement Cytolysis Protein	AD/Ctrl
25.	Fidgitin Protein II	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (18)
26.	Haptoglobin Related Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (21)
27.	Alpha-1-microglobulin	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (3)
28.	Apolipoprotein E3 Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (5)
29.	Int-α-tryp Inh HC (H4) Rel 35 KD Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (9)
30.	Glutathione -s-transferase Mu 5-5	AD/Ctrl
31.	Chain A Albumin Mutant R218H Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (1)
32.	Apoptosis Inhibitor Scavenger Receptor	AD/Ctrl
33.	Albumin Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (12)
34.	X1 Protein		PD/Ctrl (3)	AD/PD (26))
35.	Nucleoporin NUP 188 Protein		PD/Ctrl (7)	AD/PD (23)
36.	Haptoglobin HP-1 Protein		PD/Ctrl (8)
37.	Albumin Protein PRO2044		PD/Ctrl (9)
38.	Transthyretin HYPE Protein		PD/Ctrl (12)
39.	Chain A Albumin mutant R218H Protein		PD/Ctrl(14)	AD/PD (11)
40.	Immunoglobulin Kappa Light Chain Protein		PD/Ctrl (16)	AD/PD (2)
41.	Albumin Protein PRO2675 Protein		PD/Ctrl (19)	AD/PD (7)
42.	X2 Protein		PD/Ct6rl (20)	AD/PD (10)
43.	Complement C3dg			AD/PD (18)
44.	Pre-Apolipoprotein E3			AD/PD (22)
45.	Albumin PR02044 II			AD/PD (8)
46.	Immunoglobulin Kappa C Region Protein			AD/PD (17)
47.	Hemopexin			AD/PD (5)
48.	Complement C3c1b			AD/PD (24)
49.	Complement C3c1c			AD/PD (25)
50.	Complement C3c1c			AD/PD (25)
51.	Alpha-2-Macroglobulin
52.	Haptoglobin HP-1b Protein
53.	Haptoglobin HP-1e Protein
54.	Complement C3c2a Protein
55.	Transferrin Protein II
56.	X6 Protein
57.	X3 Protein
58.	X4 Protein

TABLE 10
Apo E4 (+)
AD vs PD vs Control 5302 = 0
The STEPDISC Procedure
Stepwise Selection Summary
							Average
							Squared
		Partial R-			Wilks'	Pr <	Canonical	Pr >
Step	Label	Square	F Value	Pr > F	Lambda	Lambda	Correlation	ASCC
1	N7616	0.107	17.91	<.0001	0.89302	<.0001	0.05348941	<.0001
2	N3417	0.0914	14.99	<.0001	0.81138	<.0001	0.09567486	<.0001
3	N2407	0.0743	11.91	<.0001	0.75113	<.0001	0.12731168	<.0001
4	N9312	0.0652	10.32	<.0001	0.70215	<.0001	0.15583828	<.0001
5	N7304	0.0507	7.87	0.0005	0.66657	<.0001	0.17805636	<.0001
6	N6519	0.0514	7.97	0.0004	0.63227	<.0001	0.19717401	<.0001
7	N6306	0.0389	5.94	0.003	0.60765	<.0001	0.21285299	<.0001
8	N1416	0.0382	5.8	0.0034	0.58443	<.0001	0.22897042	<.0001
9	N5123	0.0487	7.45	0.0007	0.55595	<.0001	0.24939871	<.0001
10	N7405	0.0334	5.01	0.0072	0.53737	<.0001	0.26336658	<.0001
11	N6321	0.037	5.55	0.0043	0.51748	<.0001	0.27791801	<.0001
12	N1308	0.0285	4.23	0.0155	0.50273	<.0001	0.28751745	<.0001
13	N4130	0.0254	3.74	0.0249	0.48996	<.0001	0.29711088	<.0001
14	N8307	0.0232	3.4	0.0348	0.47859	<.0001	0.30586415	<.0001
15	N1514	0.0201	2.92	0.0555	0.46898	<.0001	0.31338762	<.0001
16	N6214	0.0231	3.36	0.0362	0.45814	<.0001	0.32163852	<.0001
17	N5303	0.0242	3.51	0.0313	0.44706	<.0001	0.33036203	<.0001
18	N6224	0.0234	3.38	0.0355	0.4366	<.0001	0.33818938	<.0001
19	N8301	0.0234	3.37	0.0357	0.42636	<.0001	0.34605255	<.0001
20	N3007	0.0191	2.72	0.0676	0.41824	<.0001	0.35211982	<.0001
21	N2307	0.0181	2.56	0.0788	0.41069	<.0001	0.35762711	<.0001
22	N2511	0.0181	2.56	0.0794	0.40327	<.0001	0.36312094	<.0001

TABLE 11
Biomarkers Selected by Stepwise Discriminant Analysis for
DTAD vs. Control, DTPD vs. Control, and DTAD vs. DTPD¥
	Protein ID	Selected by Stepwise Discriminant for:
1.	Apolipoprotein E4	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (4)
2.	Complement C3c2b	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (27)
3.	Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (2)
4.	Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl(13)	AD/PD (15)
5.	Haptoglobin HP-1d	AD/Ctrl
6.	Apolipoprotein H	AD/Ctrl
7.	Lectin 3 P35	AD/Ctrl
8.	X7	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (16)
9.	Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 A3	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (6)
10.	Pre-serum Amyloid P	AD/Ctrl
11.	Clusterin Isoform 1	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (13)
12.	Transthyretin “Dimer” Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (6)
13.	X8	AD/Ctrl
14.	Acidic Histone H2A Protein (PD/LBD)	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (10)
15.	X5	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (19)
16.	Transferrin Protein I	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (20)
17.	Fidgitin Protein I	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (15)
18.	Complement C3c1a	AD/Ctrl
19.	Complement Factor H/Hs Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (17)
20.	Complement Factor I Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (4)	AD/PD (14)
21.	Haptoglobin HP-1a Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (21)
22.	Similar to Albumin	AD/Ctrl
23.	Apolipoprotein A-IV Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (11)
24.	Complement Cytolysis Protein	AD/Ctrl
25.	Fidgitin Protein II	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (18)
26.	Haptoglobin Related Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (21)
27.	Alpha-1-microglobulin	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (3)
28.	Apolipoprotein E3 Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (5)
29.	Int-α-tryp Inh HC (H4) Rel 35 KD Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (9)
30.	Glutathione -s-transferase Mu 5-5	AD/Ctrl
31.	Chain A Albumin Mutant R218H Protein	AD/Ctrl	PD/Ctrl (1)
32.	Apoptosis Inhibitor Scavenger Receptor	AD/Ctrl
33.	Albumin Protein	AD/Ctrl		AD/PD (12)
34.	XI Protein		PD/Ctrl (3)	AD/PD (26)
35.	Nucleoporin NUP 188 Protein		PD/Ctrl (7)	AD/PD (23)
36.	Haptoglobin HP-1 Protein		PD/Ctrl (8)
37.	Albumin Protein PRO2044		PD/Ctrl (9)
38.	Transthyretin HYPE Protein		PD/Ctrl (12)
39.	Chain A Albumin mutant R218H Protein		PD/Ctrl (14)	AD/PD (11)
40.	Immunoglobulin Kappa Light Chain Protein		PD/Ctrl(16)	AD/PD (2)
41.	Albumin Protein PRO2675 Protein		PD/Ctrl (19)	AD/PD (7)
42.	X2 Protein		PD/Ctrl (20)	AD/PD(10)
43.	Complement C3dg			AD/PD (18)
44.	Pre-Apolipoprotein E3			AD/PD (22)
45.	Albumin PR02044 II			AD/PD (8)
46.	Immunoglobulin Kappa C Region Protein			AD/PD (17)
47.	Hemopexin			AD/PD (5)
48.	Complement C3c1b			AD/PD (24)
49.	Complement C3c1c			AD/PD (25)
50.	Complement Factor Bb			AD/PD (1)
51.	Alpha-2-Macroglobulin
52.	Haptoglobin HP-1b Protein
53.	Haptoglobin HP-1e Protein
54.	Complement C3c2a Protein
55.	Transferrin Protein II
56.	X6 Protein
57.	X3 Protein
58.	X4 Pro

The 47 proteins described for use in the assay of the first embodiment include Apolipoprotein E3, Poly-ADP-ribosyl-A24 (monoubiquitinyl-Histone H2A), Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein A-IV, Alcohol Dehydrogenase H1A3, Apolipoprotein H, Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu5-5, Clusterin 1, Fidgitin I, Fidgitin II, α-1-microglobulin, α-2-Macroglobulin, Lectin 3 P35, Transthyretin “Dimer”, Pre-serum Amyloid Protein, Haptoglobin HP-1a, Haptoglobin HP-1b, Haptoglobin HP-1c, Haptoglobin HP-1d, Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein, Haptoglobin Related Protein HP-RP, Complement C3c1a, Complement C3c1b, Complement C3c1c, Complement C3c2a, Complement C3c2b, Complement C3dg, Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein, Complement Factor I, Complement Factor H/Hs, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Cytolysis Protein, Hemopexin, Albumin PRO2044-I, Albumen PRO2675, Inter-α-trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4) Related 35 KD Protein, Albumin PRO2044-II, Albumin, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-I, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-II, Similar to Albumin, Transferrin I, Transferrin II, Immunoglobulin Igxl, and Immunoglobulin Igxc.

Embodiment 2

A screening/diagnostic assay for drug treated AD patients is also described. Initially the drug treated patients and normal and disease controls are separated into Apo E4 positive and Apo E4 negative groups. By quantitating the serum concentrations of the same 47 proteins as used in the first embodiment, plus an additional 10 serum proteins, the assay can discriminate drug treated patients with Alzheimer's disease (Sensitivity=97.4%) from those with Parkinson's disease and age-matched normal controls (Specificity=95.7%).

The 57 proteins used in the second embodiment are listed in Table 12 and include Apolipoprotein E3, Poly-ADP-ribosyl-A24 (monoubiquitinyl-Histone H2A), Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein A-IV, Alcohol Dehydrogenase HIA3, Apolipoprotein H, Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu5-5, Clusterin 1, Fidgitin I, Fidgitin II, α-1-microglobulin, α-2-Macroglobulin, Lectin 3 P35, Transthyretin “Dimer”, Pre-serum Amyloid Protein, Haptoglobin HP-1a, Haptoglobin HP-1b, Haptoglobin HP-1c, Haptoglobin HP-1d, Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein, Haptoglobin Related Protein HP-RP, Complement C3c1a, Complement C3c1b, Complement C3c1c, Complement C3c2a, Complement C3c2b, Complement C3dg, Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein, Complement Factor I, Complement Factor H/Hs, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Cytolysis Protein, Hemopexin, Albumin PRO2044-I, Albumen PRO2675, Inter-a-trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4) Related 35 KD Protein, Albumin PRO2044-II, Albumin, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-I, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-II, Similar to Albumin, Transferrin I, Transferrin II, Immunoglobulin Igxl, and Immunoglobulin Ig_Kc, Pre-Apolipoprotein E3, Apoptosis Inhibitor AIM-CD5, Nucleoporin 188, Transthyretin Huntingtin Interacting Protein E, and Haptoglobin HP-1e.

The first embodiment provides the basis of a blood test for the differential diagnosis of drug naïve patients useful in the initial diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, prior to treatment with anti-dementia drugs, by a first physician that suspects that the patient has AD. The second embodiment is more likely to be used by a specialist, such as a neurologist or psychiatrist, for the diagnosis of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease who are already under treatment by anti dementia drugs, including donazepil, rivastigmine, memantine HCl, or the combination thereof.

The present invention includes a screening assay for neurodegenerative disease based on the up-regulation and/or down-regulation of a first group of proteins involved in cellular degeneration including Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E3, and a Transthyretin protein; a second group of Haptoglobin proteins; a third group inflammatory proteins including Complement C3c1, Complement C3c2a protein, Complement C3dg protein, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Factor H, and Inter-alpha Trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4); a fourth group of transfer proteins; and a fifth group of proteins of unknown function.

Claims

1. A method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease comprising: collecting a serum sample from a test subject that is untreated with anti-dementia drugs;analyzing the serum sample for a change in expression of a set of forty seven protein biomarkers; andusing the change in expression of the set of biomarkers to diagnose the test subject.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of biomarkers includes forty-seven serum proteins comprises a first group of proteins involved in cellular degeneration including Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E3, and a Transthyretin protein; a second group of Haptoglobin proteins; a third group inflammatory proteins including Complement C3c1, Complement C3c2a protein, Complement C3dg protein, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Factor H, and Inter-alpha Trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4); a fourth group of transfer proteins; and a fifth group of proteins of unknown function.

3. A method for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease comprising: obtaining a patient serum sample from a test subject being treated with an anti-dementia drug;determining if the patient serum sample contains Apolipoprotein E4 protein; andquantitating a concentration of a set of 57 serum proteins in the patient serum sample;

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the set of 57 serum proteins includes Apolipoprotein E3, Poly-ADP-ribosyl-A24 (monoubiquitinyl-Histone H2A), Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein A-IV, Alcohol Dehydrogenase H1A3, Apolipoprotein H, Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu5-5, Clusterin 1, Fidgitin I, Fidgitin H, α-1-microglobulin, α-2-Macroglobulin, Lectin 3 P35, Transthyretin “Dimer”, Pre-serum Amyloid Protein, Haptoglobin HP-1a, Haptoglobin HP-1b, Haptoglobin HP-1c, Haptoglobin HP-1d, Haptoglobin HP-2a Protein, Haptoglobin Related Protein HP-RP, Complement C3c1a, Complement C3c1b, Complement C3c1c, Complement C3c2a, Complement C3c2b, Complement C3dg, Complement C4b Gamma Chain Protein, Complement Factor I, Complement Factor H/Hs, Complement Factor Bb, Complement Cytolysis Protein, Hemopexin, Albumin PRO2044-I, Albumen PRO2675, Inter-α-trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chain (H4) Related 35 KD Protein, Albumin PRO2044-II, Albumin, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-I, Albumin Mutant Chain A R218H-II, Similar to Albumin, Transferrin I, Transferrin II, Immunoglobulin Igκl, and Immunoglobulin Igκc, Pre-Apolipoprotein E3, Apoptosis Inhibitor AIM-CD5, Nucleoporin 188, Transthyretin Huntingtin Interacting Protein E, and Haptoglobin HP-1e.