Diagnosis of components used for leak detection in a vapor handling system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6626032
  • Patent Number
    6,626,032
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 21, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 30, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of diagnosing components used for leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle, implemented by a system, the method including providing leak detection components including a pressure switch that moves at a given relative vacuum, a control valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough, and a shut off valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough, running an engine, determining whether the pressure switch is closed, purging a canister, specifying a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative after purging, ascertaining whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if a fail condition is specified, specifying a pass condition if the control valve is functioning after purging, determining whether the shut off valve and pressure switch are malfunctioning if a pass condition is specified based on whether the pressure switch is open, and displaying an error if a component is malfunctioning. The system includes a pressure switch, a control valve, a shut off valve, and a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve, wherein the processor runs an engine, determines whether the pressure switch is closed, purges a canister, specifies a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve and the pressure switch are malfunctioning, and displays an error if at least one of the pressure switch, the shut off valve, and the control valve is malfunctioning.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to leak detection methods and systems, and more particularly, to diagnosis of components used for automotive fuel leak detection in a vapor handling system.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In a vapor handling system for an automotive vehicle, fuel vapor that escapes from a fuel tank is stored in a canister. If there is a leak in the fuel tank, the canister, or any other component of the vapor handling system, fuel vapor could exit through the leak to escape into the atmosphere.




During leak detection, vapor handling systems may be sealed to contain the fuel vapor. However, sealingly containing the fuel vapor may be difficult due to the ability of the fuel vapors to escape through small cracks or crevices or joints and seams within the system that become porous over time. The system components may also malfunction, which may lead to an inaccurate leak detection diagnosis. As a result, it is believed that there should be a component diagnosis to provide more accurate measurements of fuel vapor leakage.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a method of diagnosing components used for leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle. This method includes providing leak detection components including a pressure switch that moves at a given relative vacuum, a control valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough, and a shut off valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough, running an engine, determining whether the pressure switch is closed, purging a canister, specifying a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative after purging, ascertaining whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if a fail condition is specified, specifying a pass condition if the control valve is functioning after purging, determining whether the shut off valve and pressure switch are malfunctioning if a pass condition is specified based on whether the pressure switch is open, and displaying an error if a component is malfunctioning.




The present invention also provides another method of diagnosing components used for leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle. This method includes providing leak detection components including a pressure switch that moves at a given relative vacuum, a control valve that operates to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, and a shut off valve that operates to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, running an engine, determining whether the pressure switch is closed, purging a canister; specifying a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative after purging, ascertaining whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if a fail condition is specified, specifying a pass condition if the control valve is functioning after purging, determining whether the shut off valve and pressure switch are malfunctioning if a pass condition is specified, displaying an error if a component is malfunctioning; and displaying a no error if the components are functioning. If the pressure switch is open before purging, the ascertaining includes operating the shut off valve to prevent flow therethrough, detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the control valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open, and indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed. Alternatively, if the pressure switch is closed before purging, the ascertaining includes indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition. If the pressure switch is closed before purging, the determining includes stopping the engine, operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough, detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open, and indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in a closed position if the pressure switch is closed. Alternatively, if the pressure switch is open before purging, the determining includes detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed, operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is open, detecting whether the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the control valve, indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in an open position if the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the control valve, operating the shut off valve and the control valve to prevent flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed after allowing flow through the control valve, detecting whether the pressure switch is open after preventing flow through the shut off valve, indicating at least one of the shut off valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition and a leak condition exists if the pressure switch is open after preventing flow through the shut off valve, operating the shut off valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed after preventing flow through the shut off valve, determining whether the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the shut off valve, specifying the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed after allowing flow through the shut off valve, and specifying a no malfunction condition if the pressure switch is open.




The present invention also provides a system for diagnosis of components used for leak detection in an engine. This system includes a pressure switch, a control valve, a shut off valve, and a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve. The processor runs an engine, determines whether the pressure switch is closed, purges a canister, specifies a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve and the pressure switch are malfunctioning, and displays an error if at least one of the pressure switch, the shut off valve, and the control valve is malfunctioning.




The present invention further provides another system for diagnosis of components used for leak detection in an engine. This system includes a pressure switch located on a conduit between a fuel tank and a canister, the canister communicating with an engine and an atmosphere, the fuel tank communicating with the engine, a shut off valve located between the canister and the atmosphere, a control valve located between the canister and the engine, and a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve. The processor runs the engine, determines whether the pressure switch is closed, purges a canister, specifies a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve and the pressure switch are malfunctioning, displays an error if at least one of the pressure switch, the shut off valve, and the control valve is malfunctioning, operates the control valve and the shut off valve to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, stops the engine, and displays a no error if the components are functioning.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiment of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of the system of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of the preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood that the Figures and descriptions of the present invention included herein illustrate and describe elements that are of particular relevance to the present invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements found in typical automotive vehicles and vapor handling systems.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, an evaporative leak detection system


10


in an automotive vehicle includes a pressure switch


11


, a shut off valve


25


, a control valve


26


, and a processor


13


. Preferably, the pressure switch


11


is located on a conduit


15


between a fuel tank


16


and a canister


17


and is in fluid communication with vapor in the fuel tank


16


. The canister


17


is also in communication with the fuel tank


16


, an atmosphere


28


, and an engine


30


. The pressure switch


11


, preferably, moves at a given relative vacuum.




The shut off valve


25


, or preferably, a canister purge vent valve, is located on a conduit


27


between the canister


17


and the atmosphere


28


. The shut off valve


25


operates to allow flow therethrough when it is open and operates to prevent flow therethrough when it is closed. The shut off valve


25


is normally open. Closing the shut off valve


25


hermetically seals the system


10


from the atmosphere


28


and opening the shut off valve


25


allows purging of the system


10


. The control valve


26


may be a canister purge control valve or an evaporative emission control valve. The control valve


26


operates to allow flow therethrough when it is open and operates to prevent flow therethrough when it is closed. Preferably, the control valve


26


is located on a conduit


29


between the canister


17


and the engine


30


. The engine


30


communicates with the fuel tank


16


and the canister


17


. Closing the control valve


26


seals the system


10


from the engine


30


.




The processor


13


, or engine management system, is operatively coupled to, or in communication with, the pressure switch


11


, the shut off valve


25


and the control valve


26


. The processor


13


receives and processes pressure signals


21


from the pressure switch


11


and sends signals


31


and


32


, respectively, to the valves


25


and


26


, respectively. The processor


13


also runs the engine


30


, determines whether the pressure switch


11


is closed, purges the canister


17


, specifies a fail condition if the control valve


26


is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve


26


is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve


26


is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve


25


and the pressure switch


11


are malfunctioning, and displays an error if the pressure switch


11


, the shut off valve


25


, or the control valve


26


is malfunctioning. In addition, the processor


13


may operate the control valve


26


and the shut off valve


25


to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough and stop the engine


30


.




The system


10


implements a method of leak detection, or leak detection diagnosis. The system


10


also monitors for malfunction of the leak detection components. In particular the system


10


monitors the pressure switch


11


, the shut off valve


25


and the control valve


26


. Preferably, the input component, or the pressure switch


11


, is monitored continuously for electrical values and with rationality monitoring in appropriate conditions. Preferably, rationality monitoring occurs at least once per driving cycle.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, while the engine


30


is running, the system


10


determines whether the pressure switch


11


is closed in block


50


and preferably, displays that there is no error or the position of the pressure switch


11


is closed in block


51


or open in block


52


. The canister


17


is purged, preferably by a richness method, and a pass or fail condition is specified. The pass and fail condition corresponds to whether the control valve


26


is operative or inoperative, respectively. If a fail condition is specified, and if in block


50


, the pressure switch


11


is open, as specified in block


52


, the system


10


specifies that the control valve


26


is inoperative in block


55


. The shut off valve


25


is closed, or operates to prevent flow therethrough, the system


10


detects whether the pressure switch


11


is open and ascertains the status of the inoperative control valve


26


in blocks


56


and


57


. If the pressure switch


11


is open, in block


56


, the system


10


displays that the control valve


26


is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition. As such, the leak detection diagnosis will be inaccurate. Conversely, if the pressure switch


11


is closed, in block


57


, the system


10


indicates that the control valve


26


is inoperative in a flow-through condition. If, however, in block


50


, the pressure switch


11


is closed, as indicated in block


51


and a fail condition is specified, the system


10


displays that the control valve


26


is inoperative in a flow-through condition in block


59


.




If the control valve


26


is functioning after the purge, where a pass condition is specified, the system


10


will determine whether the shut off valve


25


and the pressure switch are malfunctioning. If the pressure switch


11


is closed before purging the system


10


and a pass condition is specified, as indicated in block


60


, the control valve


26


will be opened when the engine stops and the system


10


will detect whether the pressure switch


11


is open. If the pressure switch is open, the shut off valve


25


is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, which is displayed as an error in block


61


. If the pressure switch


11


is closed, the pressure switch


11


is inoperative in a closed position, which is displayed as an error in block


62


.




If the pressure switch


11


is open before purging the system


10


and a pass condition is specified, the system


10


detects whether the pressure switch


11


is open and if the pressure switch


11


is closed, indicates that the shut off valve


25


is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, which is displayed as an error in block


64


. If the pressure switch


11


is open, as indicated in block


65


, the control valve


26


is opened to allow flow therethrough and the system


10


detects whether the pressure switch


11


is open. If the pressure switch


11


is open, the system


10


indicates that the pressure switch


11


is inoperative in an open position, which is displayed as an error in block


66


. If the pressure switch


11


is closed, as indicated in block


67


, the shut off valve


25


and the control valve


26


will be closed to prevent flow therethrough. Preferably, the shut off valve is closed first, as indicated in block


69


.




After the valves


25


and


26


are closed, the system detects whether the pressure switch


11


is open. If the pressure switch


11


is open, the system


10


indicates that either the shut off valve


25


is inoperative in a flow-through condition or a leak condition exists in block


70


. If the pressure switch


11


is closed, as indicated in block


72


, the shut off valve


25


is opened to allow flow therethrough and the system


10


determines whether the pressure switch


11


is open. If the pressure switch


11


is open, a no malfunction condition, or no error, is specified in block


74


. If the pressure switch


11


is closed, the shut off valve


25


is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, as specified in block


76


.




While the invention has been disclosed with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims and their equivalents thereof. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it have the full scope defined by the language of the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of diagnosing components used for leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle comprising:providing leak detection components including a pressure switch that moves at a given relative vacuum, a control valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough, and a shut off valve that operates to allow and prevent flow therethrough; running an engine; determining whether the pressure switch is closed; purging a canister; specifying a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative after purging; ascertaining whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if a fail condition is specified; specifying a pass condition if the control valve is functioning after purging; determining whether the shut off valve and pressure switch are malfunctioning if a pass condition is specified based on whether the pressure switch is open; and displaying an error if a component is malfunctioning.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein if the pressure switch is closed before purging, the determining comprises:stopping the engine; operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough; detecting whether the pressure switch is open; indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open; and indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in a closed position if the pressure switch is closed.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein if the pressure switch is open before purging, the ascertaining comprises:operating the shut off valve to prevent flow therethrough; detecting whether the pressure switch is open; indicating the control valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open; and indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein if the pressure switch is closed before purging, the ascertaining comprises:indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein if the pressure switch is open before purging, the determining comprises:detecting whether the pressure switch is open; indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed; and operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is open.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the operating the control valve further comprises:detecting whether the pressure switch is open; indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in a flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open; and operating the shut off valve and the control valve to prevent flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the operating the shut off valve and the control valve further comprises:detecting whether the pressure switch is open; indicating at least one of the shut off valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition and a leak condition exists if the pressure switch is open; and controlling the shut off valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the controlling further comprises:determining whether the pressure switch is open; specifying the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed; and specifying a no malfunction condition if the pressure switch is open.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the purging comprises:using a richness method.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising:displaying a no error if the components are functioning.
  • 11. A method of diagnosing components used for leak detection in a closed vapor handling system of an automotive vehicle comprising:providing leak detection components including a pressure switch that moves at a given relative vacuum, a control valve that operates to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, and a shut off valve that operates to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough; running an engine; determining whether the pressure switch is closed; purging a canister; specifying a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative after purging; ascertaining whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if a fail condition is specified, wherein if the pressure switch is open before purging, the ascertaining includes: operating the shut off valve to prevent flow therethrough, detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the control valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open, and indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed, and wherein if the pressure switch is closed before purging, the ascertaining includes indicating the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition; specifying a pass condition if the control valve is functioning after purging; determining whether the shut off valve and pressure switch are malfunctioning if a pass condition is specified, wherein if the pressure switch is closed before purging, the determining includes: stopping the engine, operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough, detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is open, and indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in a closed position if the pressure switch is closed, and wherein if the pressure switch is open before purging, the determining includes: detecting whether the pressure switch is open, indicating the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed, operating the control valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is open, detecting whether the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the control valve, indicating the pressure switch is inoperative in an open position if the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the control valve, operating the shut off valve and the control valve to prevent flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed after allowing flow through the control valve, detecting whether the pressure switch is open after preventing flow through the shut off valve, indicating at least one of the shut off valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition and a leak condition exists if the pressure switch is open after preventing flow through the shut off valve, operating the shut off valve to allow flow therethrough if the pressure switch is closed after preventing flow through the shut off valve, determining whether the pressure switch is open after allowing flow through the shut off valve, specifying the shut off valve is inoperative in a non-flow-through condition if the pressure switch is closed after allowing flow through the shut off valve, and specifying a no malfunction condition if the pressure switch is open; displaying an error if a component is malfunctioning; and displaying a no error if the components are functioning.
  • 12. A system for diagnosis of components used for leak detection in an engine comprising:a pressure switch; a control valve; a shut off valve; and a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve, wherein the processor runs an engine, determines whether the pressure switch is closed, purges a canister, specifies a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve and the pressure switch are malfunctioning, and displays an error if at least one of the pressure switch, the shut off valve, and the control valve is malfunctioning.
  • 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the pressure switch moves at a given relative vacuum.
  • 14. The system of claim 12 wherein the control valve comprises a canister purge control valve.
  • 15. The system of claim 12 wherein the shut off valve comprises a canister purge vent valve.
  • 16. The system of claim 12 wherein the processor monitors input components for electrical values and with rationality monitoring at least once per driving cycle.
  • 17. The system of claim 12 further comprising:a fuel tank communicating with an engine; and a canister communicating with the fuel tank, the engine and an atmosphere, the pressure switch located between the fuel tank and the canister, the shut off valve located between the canister and the atmosphere, the control valve located between the canister and the engine.
  • 18. The system of claim 12 wherein the processor operates the control valve and the shut off valve to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, stops the engine, and displays a no error if the components are functioning.
  • 19. The system of claim 12 wherein the process displays only one error.
  • 20. A system for diagnosis of components used for leak detection in an engine comprising:a pressure switch located on a conduit between a fuel tank and a canister, the canister communicating with an engine and an atmosphere, the fuel tank communicating with the engine; a shut off valve located between the canister and the atmosphere; a control valve located between the canister and the engine; and a processor operatively coupled to the pressure sensing element, the control valve, and the shut off valve and receiving pressure signals from the pressure sensing element and sending signals to the control valve and the shut off valve, wherein the processor runs the engine, determines whether the pressure switch is closed, purges a canister, specifies a fail condition if the control valve is inoperative, ascertains whether the control valve is inoperative in a flow-through condition or inoperative in a non-flow-through condition, specifies a pass condition if the control valve is functioning, determines whether the shut off valve and the pressure switch are malfunctioning, displays an error if at least one of the pressure switch, the shut off valve, and the control valve is malfunctioning, operates the control valve and the shut off valve to allow flow and prevent flow therethrough, stops the engine, and displays a no error if the components are functioning.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application expressly claims the benefit of the earlier filing date and right of priority from the following patent application: U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/184,193, filed on Feb. 22, 2000 in the name of Laurent Fabre and Pierre Calvairac and entitled “Vacuum Detection.” The entirety of that earlier filed provisional patent application is expressly incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
5143035 Kayanuma Sep 1992 A
5263462 Reddy Nov 1993 A
5275144 Gross Jan 1994 A
5295472 Otsuka et al. Mar 1994 A
5398661 Denz et al. Mar 1995 A
5490414 Durschmidt et al. Feb 1996 A
5744701 Peterson et al. Apr 1998 A
5750888 Matsumoto et al. May 1998 A
5957115 Busato et al. Sep 1999 A
5967124 Cook et al. Oct 1999 A
5988206 Bare et al. Nov 1999 A
6073487 Dawson Jun 2000 A
6089081 Cook et al. Jul 2000 A
6158270 Garman et al. Dec 2000 A
6164123 Corkill Dec 2000 A
6260410 Cook et al. Jul 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
0 598 176 Mar 1994 EP
0 611 674 Aug 1994 EP
0 952 332 Oct 1999 EP
2 732 072 Sep 1996 FR
WO 9918419 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9937905 Jul 1999 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/184193 Feb 2000 US