This disclosure generally relates to an apparatus and method for diagnosing a fuel system of an internal combustion engine. In particular, this disclosure is directed to a diagnostic apparatus and method for servicing a fuel system including an integrated pressure management apparatus (IPMA).
A conventional evaporative control system collects in a charcoal canister the fuel vapor that escapes from a fuel tank. If there is a leak in the fuel tank, canister, or any other component of the evaporative control system, some fuel vapor could escape through the leak into the atmosphere instead of being collected in the canister. Thus, it is desirable to detect leaks.
Leak detection for an evaporative control system is one of several functions that are performed by the IPMA that is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/542,052, filed Mar. 31, 2000, and which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Briefly, a switch can be activated indicating displacement of a pressure operable device in response to a negative pressure level in a charcoal canister. A properly performing, i.e., sealed, evaporative system should at least maintain the negative pressure level. However, if the evaporative system has a large enough leak, the evaporative system will not maintain switch activation. In an extreme case of a gross leak, no appreciable negative pressure occurs in the evaporative system occurs and the switch activation does not occur. Servicing this IPMA can include verifying switch activity and evaporation system integrity.
It is believed that there is a need to provide an IPMA service tool that can evaluate evaporative control system integrity and verify IPMA switch activity.
The present invention provides a diagnostic appartus for a fuel system that supplies fuel to an internal combustion engine. The fuel system includes a fuel tank that has a headspace and a filler occluded by a removable cap, a charcoal canister in fluid communication with the headspace, and an integrated pressure management apparatus. The integrated pressure management apparatus has a pressure operable device and a switch that signals displacement of the pressure operable device in response to negative pressure at a first pressure level in the charcoal canister. The diagnostic apparatus comprises a pressure source, a first fitting adapted to be occluded by the removable cap, a second fitting adapted to sealingly engage the filler, an orifice in fluid communication with the pressure source, with the first fitting, and with the second fitting, and a first valve controlling the fluid communication with the orifice. The first fitting is in fluid communication with the pressure source, and the second fitting is in fluid communication with the pressure source and with the first fitting.
The present invention also provides a method of method of diagnosing a fuel system that supplies fuel to an internal combustion engine. The fuel system includes a fuel tank that has a headspace and a filler occluded by a removable cap, a charcoal canister in fluid communication with the headspace, and an integrated pressure management apparatus. The integrated pressure management apparatus has a pressure operable device and a switch that provides a signal indicating displacement of the pressure operable device in response to negative pressure at a first pressure level in the charcoal canister. The method comprises installing a diagnostic apparatus between the filler and the cap, closing a valve that controls fluid communication with an orifice, operating a pressure source to draw a vacuum relative to ambient pressure, and detecting the signal provided by the switch. The diagnostic appratus includes the pressure source, the orifice that is in fluid communication with the pressure source, with the filler, and with the cap, and the valve.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain features of the invention.
As it is used herein, “pressure” is measured relative to the ambient atmospheric pressure. Thus, positive pressure refers to pressure greater than the ambient atmospheric pressure and negative pressure, or “vacuum,” refers to pressure less than the ambient atmospheric pressure.
Referring to
The fuel tank 20 contains volatile liquid fuel and fuel vapors in a headspace 22 above the surface of the liquid fuel. A filler 24 that is normally occluded by a cap 26 provides access to the fuel tank 20 during refueling. A first conduit 28 provides fluid communication between the headspace 22 and the charcoal canister 30.
In a conventional manner, the charcoal canister 30 collects fuel vapors from the beadspace 22. A second conduit 32 provides fluid communication from the charcoal canister 30 to the purge valve 40, and a third conduit 42 provides fluid communication from the purge valve 40 to an intake manifold (not shown) of the internal combustion engine 12.
The IPMA 50 is in fluid communication with the charcoal canister via a fourth conduit 52. The IPMA 50 can perform a plurality of functions including signaling that a predetermined first pressure (vacuum) level exists in the charcoal canister 30, relieving pressure at a value below the first pressure level, relieving pressure above a second pressure level, and controllably connecting, via a fifth conduit 54 in fluid communication with a filter 56, the charcoal canister 30 to ambient atmospheric pressure.
The engine control unit 60 can provide output signals to the internal combustion engine 12 and to the purge valve 40. These output signals are at least in part based on input signals from the IPMA 50 and other sensors (not shown).
In the course of cooling that is experienced by the fuel, e.g., after the internal combustion engine 12 is turned off, a vacuum is allowed to develop in the evaporative control system 10 due to its isolation from the atmosphere by the function of the IPMA 50. The existence of a vacuum at the first pressure level indicates that the integrity of the evaporative control system 10 is satisfactory. Accordingly, the IPMA 50 provides to the engine control unit 60 an input signal that indicates the integrity of the evaporative control system 10, i.e., that there are no leaks. The IPMA 50 can also relieve pressure below the first pressure level to protect the evaporative control system 10, e.g., to prevent the fuel tank 20 from collapsing due to excess vacuum.
Immediately after the internal combustion engine 12 is turned off, the IPMA 50 can perform “blow off,” i.e., relieving excess pressure due to fuel vaporization, and thereby facilitate subsequent vacuum generation that occurs during cooling. During blow off, air within the evaporative system 10 is released while fuel molecules are retained. Similarly, in the course of refueling the fuel tank 20, relieving excess pressure allows air to exit the fuel tank 20 at a high rate of flow.
While the internal combustion engine 12 is turned on, the IPMA 50 can connect the canister 30 to ambient air, thereby facilitating purge flow from the charcoal canister 30, through the purge valve 40, to the internal combustion engine 12. While the internal combustion engine 12 is turned off, the IPMA 50 can provide to the engine control unit 60 the input signal indicating the vacuum level that is generated during cooling.
Referring additionally to
In fluid communication with the first and second fittings 102,104 is a pressure source 110 and a leak down orifice 120. Preferably, the pressure source 110 creates a vacuum, i.e., a negative pressure relative to ambient. A first valve 122 controls fluid communication between the pressure source 110 and the leak down orifice 120. After the pressure source 110 establishes in the evaporative control system 10 a pressure level that is at or below the predetermined first pressure level, the first valve 122 can be opened and the vacuum in the evaporative control system 10 can be bled down via the leak down orifice 120. The pressure source 110 can include a manually operated hand pump, an electromechanical pump, or some other equivalent device for drawing a vacuum.
A second valve 124 can control fluid communication between the pressure source 110 and the second fitting 104. Opening the second valve 124 enables the diagnostic apparatus 100 to test the evaporative control system 10. Closing the second valve 124 enables the diagnostic apparatus 100 to separately test the removable cap 26, i.e., by isolating the removable cap 26 from the remainder of the evaporative control system 10.
A third valve 125 can control fluid communication between the pressure source 110 and the first fitting 102. Closing the third valve 125 enables the diagnostic apparatus 100 to test the evaporative control system 10. Opening the third valve 125 enables the diagnostic apparatus 100 to test the evaporative control system 10 including the removable cap 26.
A pressure gauge 130 on the suction side of the pressure source 110 can measure the pressure level drawn by the pressure source 110. The pressure gauge 130 can be a low-pressure vacuum gauge, a pressure transducer, or some other equivalent device for measuring a range of pressures that preferably exceeds the operational range of the IPMA 50. As an example, the pressure gauge 130 may measure pressures that range between approximately one inch of water above ambient pressure and two inches of water below ambient pressure.
A method of diagnosing the evaporative control system 10 and servicing the IPMA 50 will now be described. First, the cap 26 is removed from the filler 24 in order to open the evaporative control system 10. Fluid communication between the evaporative control system 10 and the diagnostic apparatus 100 is established by matingly engaging the removed cap 26 with the first fitting 102, and by matingly engaging the second fitting 104 with the filler 24.
To diagnose the integrity of the removable cap 26 separate from the rest of the evaporative control system 10, the first and second valves 122,124 are closed to isolate the pressure source 110, the first fitting 102, the removable cap 26, and the pressure gauge 130. The pressure source 110 is operated to draw a vacuum at or below, as indicated by the pressure gauge 130, the predetermined first pressure level. Operation of the pressure source 110 is discontinued and the pressure gauge 130 is monitored to detect changes in the pressure drawn by the pressure source 110. The inability to establish a vacuum at the predetermined first level, or a rising pressure level, as indicated by the pressure gauge 130, are indicative of a flawed removable cap 26.
To diagnose the integrity of the entire evaporative control system 10, including the removable cap 26, the first valve 122 is closed, the second valve 124 is opened, and the third valve 125 is opened. The pressure source 110 is then operated to draw a vacuum at or below, as indicated by the pressure gauge 130, the predetermined first pressure level. The inability to establish a vacuum at the predetermined first level is indicative of a gross leak in the evaporative control system 10. A rising pressure level, as indicated by the pressure gauge 130, is indicative of a leak somewhere in the evaporative control system 10. The loss of vacuum (magnitude rate) is a rough measure of the leak size. However, there are other influences that can cause a pressure/vacuum change in an otherwise sealed evaporative control system 10. For example, vacuum decay can be caused by the temperature of the evaporative control system 10 relative to the ambient temperature, barometric pressure changes, agitation of the vehicle/fuel creating accelerated evaporation, refueling of the fuel tank 20, etc.
The diagnostic apparatus 100 can also be used to service the IPMA 50, e.g., for verifying switch activity. To cycle the IPMA switch, the pressure source 110 is operated to draw in the evaporative control system 10 a vacuum at which activation of the IPMA switch occurs. Switch activity can be monitored with an electrical meter, e.g., a voltmeter, connected to the switch, or with an output signal from the engine control unit 60. The pressure level at which the switch is activated, i.e., the first pressure level, can be measured by the pressure gauge 130.
The activity of the IPMA switch can continue to be monitored as the first valve 122 is opened to bleed-off through the leak down orifice 120 the vacuum in the evaporative control system 10.
The diagnostic apparatus 100 can also be used to verify other functions of the IPMA 50. Specifically, the diagnostic apparatus 100 can be used to negatively or positively pressurize the evaporative control system 10. Drawing an excessive negative pressure, i.e., a pressure below that required for the IPMA 50 to perform leak detection, can verify the vacuum relief function of the IPMA 50. And creating a positive pressure in the evaporative control system 10 can verify the blow-off function of the evaporative control system 10. Moreover, such a positive pressure test could be used in connection with hydrocarbon sniffer technology and methodology to aid in locating a leak in the evaporative control system 10.
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it have the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3110502 | Pagano | Nov 1963 | A |
3190322 | Brown | Jun 1965 | A |
3413840 | Basile et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3516279 | Maziarka | Jun 1970 | A |
3586016 | Meyn | Jun 1971 | A |
3640501 | Walton | Feb 1972 | A |
3720090 | Halpert et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3802267 | Lofink | Apr 1974 | A |
3841344 | Slack | Oct 1974 | A |
3861646 | Douglas | Jan 1975 | A |
3927553 | Frantz | Dec 1975 | A |
4009985 | Hirt | Mar 1977 | A |
4136854 | Ehmig et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4164168 | Tateoka | Aug 1979 | A |
4166485 | Wokas | Sep 1979 | A |
4215846 | Ishizuka et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4240467 | Blatt et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4244210 | Prohaska et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4244554 | DiMauro et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4354383 | Härtel | Oct 1982 | A |
4368366 | Kitamura et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4474208 | Looney | Oct 1984 | A |
4494571 | Seegers et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4518329 | Weaver | May 1985 | A |
4561297 | Holland | Dec 1985 | A |
4616114 | Strasser | Oct 1986 | A |
4717117 | Cook | Jan 1988 | A |
4766557 | Twerdochlib | Aug 1988 | A |
4766927 | Conatser | Aug 1988 | A |
4852054 | Mastandrea | Jul 1989 | A |
4901559 | Grabner | Feb 1990 | A |
4905505 | Reed | Mar 1990 | A |
5036823 | MacKinnon | Aug 1991 | A |
5069188 | Cook | Dec 1991 | A |
5090234 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5096029 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101710 | Baucom | Apr 1992 | A |
5239858 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5253629 | Fornuto et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5259424 | Miller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263462 | Reddy | Nov 1993 | A |
5273071 | Oberrecht | Dec 1993 | A |
5327934 | Thompson | Jul 1994 | A |
5337262 | Luthi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5369984 | Rogers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372032 | Filippi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375455 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5388613 | Krüger | Feb 1995 | A |
5390643 | Sekine | Feb 1995 | A |
5390645 | Cook et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5415033 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425266 | Fournier | Jun 1995 | A |
5437257 | Giacomazzi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448980 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474050 | Cook et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507176 | Kammeraad et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524662 | Benjey et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5564306 | Miller | Oct 1996 | A |
5579742 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584271 | Sakata | Dec 1996 | A |
5603349 | Harris | Feb 1997 | A |
5614665 | Curran et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5635630 | Dawson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644072 | Chirco et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671718 | Curran et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681151 | Wood | Oct 1997 | A |
5687633 | Eady | Nov 1997 | A |
5743169 | Yamada | Apr 1998 | A |
5826566 | Isobe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5884609 | Kawamoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893389 | Cunningham | Apr 1999 | A |
5894784 | Bobbitt, III et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911209 | Kouda et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5979869 | Hiddessen | Nov 1999 | A |
6003499 | Devall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6073487 | Dawson | Jun 2000 | A |
6089081 | Cook et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6142062 | Streitman | Nov 2000 | A |
6145430 | Able et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168168 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176118 | Kidokoro et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202688 | Khadim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203022 | Struschka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6327898 | Harris | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328021 | Perry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030000289 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |