Patent Grant
10786229
The present application claims priority from Australian provisional patent application no. 2015900186, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to devices and methods for identifying conditions in a human or animal body, such as pregnancy or ovulation. For example, the present disclosure relates to devices and methods for identifying pregnancy or ovulation, which devices and methods are adapted to mitigate the “hook effect”, thereby improving accuracy of the devices and methods.
There exist many types of diagnostic devices for identifying target medical conditions in a human or animal. Increasingly, these devices are being designed for home use. The devices analyse a biological sample from the human or animal, such as a urine sample, blood sample or otherwise, and identify an analyte in the sample that provides a marker for a target condition.
One of the most widely used and recognised diagnostic devices is the home pregnancy test, which commonly employs lateral flow technology and uses human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a marker for pregnancy.
Diagnostic devices that allow highly accurate testing are clearly desirable. Many diagnostic devices provide for binary identification of the target condition, where it is determined only if the target condition is present (a positive result) or not present (a negative result). In these devices, accuracy is a function of the sensitivity of the device, which is its ability to detect true positive results, and the specificity of the device, which is its ability to detect true negative results. Increasing accuracy is particularly important for diagnostic devices used at home, where there can be no trained health professional to interpret identification results and the value of the results to the care of a patient. The sensitivity of diagnostic devices increases when the devices are configured to detect smaller amounts of the marker analyte, yielding more true positive results. The sensitivity of a diagnostic device is particularly important to enable detection of early stage pregnancy when hCG may be present in serum or urine at low levels e.g., 1-20 IU/L. However, because the normal range of hCG in a pregnant woman can be from 1-200,000 IU/L, it is equally necessary for the accuracy of a diagnostic device to be able to detect hCG when present at higher levels.
A common problem which limits the accuracy of existing diagnostic devices for pregnancy is the dynamic range for detecting hCG, and in particular, the “hook effect” or “prozone effect” when hCG is present in a test sample at high levels. This is particularly common in diagnostic devices which employ sandwich assays when hCG is present in a test sample in sufficiently high concentrations to cause saturation (to a certain extent) of both the capture and signal (labelled) antibodies, thereby preventing the formation of a “sandwich”. As a result, the signal generated is less than what would be expected at that concentration, and this results in detection of artificially low hCG or possibly even false negative results, when in fact hCG is present in a sample at high concentrations. Accordingly, there is a need to improve the dynamic range of diagnostic devices and assays which detect hCG to mitigate spurious results caused by the “hook effect”.
Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present disclosure as it existed before the priority date of each claim of this application.
As discussed above, hCG is a hormone produced during pregnancy and therefore measurement of the levels of hCG in a biological sample e.g., blood or urine, is a well-known procedure for testing pregnancy in women. Whilst it is important for a test apparatus or method to be relatively sensitive to low levels of hCG in order to detect pregnancy shortly after conception, the levels of hCG rapidly increase after conception. Accordingly, there is also a need to be able to detect hCG at high levels in order to accurately determine whether a woman is pregnant or not.
The present disclosure is based, in part, on the recognition that commercially available pregnancy tests can be inaccurate when hCG is present at high levels owing to the hook or prozone effect (referred to hereinafter only as “the hook effect”). For example, many commercially available pregnancy tests fail to provide an accurate quantitative (or semi-quantitative) measurement of hCG when high levels of hCG are present in a sample. The present disclosure provides devices and methods for detecting pregnancy in a subject which can extend the upper limit of the dynamic range for detecting hCG in a sample, thereby permitting the measurement of samples containing high levels of hCG that might otherwise appear to be low or non-existent owing to the hook effect. The devices and methods disclosed herein can also allow a more accurate quantitation of the level of hCG in a sample, at higher levels of hCG. This has many advantages, including the ability of the devices and methods disclosed herein to optionally indicate time since conception. Furthermore, by selecting appropriate capture reagents, the devices and methods disclosed herein can also be used simultaneously to determine whether a subject is pregnant or ovulating. In this regard, the present disclosure provides, for example, devices and methods which can mitigate the hook effect when detecting hCG in samples with high concentrations of hCG and which can serve the dual purpose of (i) determining whether or not a subject is pregnant, and (ii) determining whether or not a subject is ovulating.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides an apparatus for detecting pregnancy and/or ovulation in a subject, said apparatus comprising one or more lateral flow test strips comprising:
The detectable labels of the first and second capture reagents may be the same or may be different.
The one or more lateral flow test strips may be configured such that the second test portion is positioned downstream of the first test portion, and the first test portion is position downstream of the label-holding portion. Alternative configurations are described herein.
The immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion binds hCG with a lower affinity than the immobilised capture reagent of the first test portion. In other words, the immobilised capture reagent of the first test portion has a greater affinity for binding hCG than the immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion has for binding hCG.
In use, the apparatus can detect the presence or absence of hCG and/or LH in a biological sample obtained from a subject. The apparatus can also detect the presence of hCG in a sample when the level of hCG is high without “hooking out”, thereby permitting an accurate determination of whether or not a woman from which the sample is obtained is pregnant or not. In particular, the apparatus can allow the accurate quantitation (or semi-quantitation) of the level of hCG in a sample when the sample contains high levels of hCG.
The ability to mitigate or reduce the hook effect and detect hCG at high levels can be achieved by virtue of the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion having a lower binding affinity for binding hCG relative to the immobilised capture reagent at the first test portion. In this regard, if, during use, hCG is present in a sample in sufficiently high concentrations to cause saturation (to a certain extent) of both the mobilisable capture reagent for hCG and the immobilised capture reagent for hCG at the first test portion, then the formation of a sandwich between the labelled hCG complex and the immobilised capture reagent at the first test portion is prevented or significantly reduced. As a result, the signal generated at the first test portion does not provide an accurate indication of the true level of hCG in the sample. Thus, the signal at the first test portion may be low at low levels of hCG in the sample, and may be low at high levels of hCG in the sample. Indeed, it is possible that the signal may even be absent at the first test portion, despite the sample containing a high level of hCG.
However, in the apparatus disclosed herein, the labelled hCG complex in the sample is also able to bind the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion, which has a lower affinity for hCG than the immobilised capture reagent at the first test portion. The lower binding affinity for binding hCG of the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion, coupled with the configuration of the first and second test portions on the test strip, can therefore extend the upper limit of the dynamic range for detecting hCG in a sample. Thus, a “hook effect” should not be observed at the second test portion.
Furthermore, because the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion may also bind LH, the apparatus of the disclosure can also be used to detect the presence or absence of LH in a sample and thereby determine if the woman from which the sample is obtained is ovulating.
The capture reagent of the first and/or second test portions may be an antibody. For example, the immobilised capture reagent of the first test portion may be an antibody configured to bind an epitope of hCG which is specific to hCG i.e., not present in LH. Thus, the antibody may not be cross-reactive with LH. The immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion may be an antibody which binds an epitope or region which is common to hCG and LH. For example, the immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion may be an anti-LH antibody capable of binding hCG.
The first and second mobilisable capture reagents of the label-holding portion may be conjugated to one or more detectable labels. The detectable labels may be the same or may be different. The labels may be conjugated directly to the mobilisable capture reagent, or may be conjugated to the mobilisable capture reagent via a linker. Any suitable detectable label known in the art may be used. The apparatus disclosed herein may comprise a control portion. The control portion may be positioned downstream of the second test portion. The control portion may comprise an immobilised or mobilisable reagent configured to detect a biological sample from a subject and/or configured to detect the first and/or second mobilisable capture reagent. Thus, the control portion may comprise an immobilised or mobilisable reagent configured to detect a biological sample from a subject e.g., urine or blood. Alternatively or in addition, the control portion may comprise an immobilised or mobilisable reagent configured to detect the first and/or second mobilisable capture reagent. The reagent configured to detect the first and/or second mobilisable capture reagent may be an antibody.
The one or more test strips of the apparatus of the disclosure may comprise a sample receiving portion configured to contact a biological sample from the subject e.g., urine or blood, or a component part of the sample. The sample receiving portion may be upstream of the label-holding portion of the test strip.
An apparatus in accordance with the present disclosure may also comprise a display, configured to present information about the identification of pregnancy and/or ovulation to a user.
The apparatus in accordance with the present disclosure may comprise a reader to identify hCG and/or LH. The reader may include one or more photodetectors capable of monitoring a light signal at the first and/or second test portions.
In general, the signals at the first and/or second test portions, which may be monitored or detected, may comprise light signals such as light reflection signals and/or fluorescent light signals or otherwise. The light signals may be generated as a result of detectable labels immobilised at the first and/or second test portions reflecting light and/or fluorescing light. The apparatus may comprise a light source that shines light on the first and/or second test portion to cause light reflection and/or fluorescing. Monitoring or detecting the presence and/or level of such light signals may comprise determining an absolute or relative intensity of the signals, for example. The absolute or relative intensity of the signals will be dependent on the number and type of detectable labels immobilised at the first and/or second test portions.
The apparatus of the present disclosure may be configured such that, in use:
The occurrence of a hook effect can be determined in (ii) above by a quantitative or semi-quantitative comparison of the signal at the first and second test portions. Such a comparison can also allow an accurate quantitation of the true level of hCG in the sample. This true level can be used, for example, to indicate the amount of time which has elapsed since conception.
For example, a low signal at the first test portion combined with a moderate or high signal at the second test portion may indicate a high level of hCG in the sample (and the occurrence of a hook effect). Alternatively, when the affinity of the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion for hCG is lower than that at the first test portion, a low signal at the first test portion combined with a low signal at the second test portion may also indicate a high level of hCG in the sample (and the occurrence of a hook effect). It will be appreciated that the precise comparison of signals at the first and second test portions may depend on the particular affinities, quantities, and other properties of the immobilised capture reagents at the first and second test portions.
The occurrence of ovulation may be detected in (iii) above. Normally, this would occur when there are detectable levels of LH in the sample and undetectable levels of hCG in the sample. However, if some hCG is also present in the sample, some signal may also be detected at the first test portion. To avoid the possible misinterpretation of such a result as the occurrence of a hook effect, two different detectable labels can be used to distinguish LH from hCG at the second test portion. The use of two different detectable labels to distinguish LH from hCG at the second test portion may also safeguard against an incorrect interpretation of ovulation in the rare occurrence that there is so much hCG in the sample that there is no binding of hCG at the first test portion at all (an “extreme hook effect”).
Alternatively or in addition, the apparatus may be configured to comprise a further, third test portion located downstream of the first and/or second test portion(s), wherein the third test portion comprises an immobilised capture reagent as in the first and/or second test portion(s). Detection and/or quantitation of a signal at the third test portion may provide an additional indication of the true level of hCG in the sample. It will be appreciated that the third test portion may be repeated one or more times (thereby introducing fourth, fifth, sixth etc. test portions each comprising an immobilised capture reagent as in the first and/or second test portion(s)).
The present disclosure also provides a method of determining whether or not a subject is pregnant or ovulating, said method comprising:
As indicated, the presence and/or level of hCG and/or LH in the sample can be determined by determining the presence and/or level of signals at the first and/or second test portion(s). Thus, any discussion herein of the detection of the level and/or amount of hCG and/or LH is to be interpreted as encompassing the determination of the presence and/or level of the associated signal.
The detection of the presence and/or level of hCG and/or LH at the first and/or second test portion(s) may indicate pregnancy and/or ovulation as described herein.
Whilst the apparatus and methods disclosed herein can include an immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion which is capable of binding LH and hCG, it is recognised that a number of other capture reagents capable of binding hCG with a lower affinity than that of the immobilised capture reagent at the first test portion may be used (particularly, though not necessarily exclusively, when the apparatus is not intended to detect ovulation). Thus, the second test portion may comprise any capture reagent capable of binding hCG with a lower affinity than that of the capture reagent at the first test portion. This is based on the recognition that the ability to extend the upper limit of the dynamic range for detecting hCG can be achieved by virtue of the differential affinities of the respective immobilised capture reagents at the first and second test portions for hCG. For example, the extension of the upper limit of the dynamic range for detection of hCG can be achieved when the immobilised capture reagent at the second test portion has a lower binding affinity for binding hCG relative to the immobilised capture reagent at the first test portion.
Accordingly, the present disclosure also provides in one aspect an apparatus for detecting pregnancy in a subject, said apparatus comprising one or more lateral flow test strips comprising:
The one or more lateral flow test strips may be configured such that the second test portion is positioned downstream of the first test portion, and the first test portion is positioned downstream of the label-holding portion. This apparatus may incorporate any one or more features of any other apparatus disclosed herein, in any combination.
The present disclosure also provides a method of detecting a high level of hCG in a biological sample, said method comprising:
In accordance with any method of the present disclosure, detecting hCG at the second test portion may be indicative of a high level of hCG being present in the biological sample. For example, the high level may be greater than 200,000 mIU/ml. For example, the high level may be at least 300,000 mIU/ml, at least 400,000 mIU/ml, at least 500,000 mIU/ml, at least 600,000 mIU/ml, at least 700,000 mIU/ml, at least 800,000 mIU/ml, at least 900,000 mIU/ml, or at least 1,000,000 mIU/ml of hCG.
In addition to mitigating the “hook effect”, the apparatus, test strip and method described herein provide a means for more accurately quantitating the amount of hCG in a sample, particularly when present at high concentrations. For example, this may be achieved by detecting the presence and/or level of hCG at the second test portion. The apparatus, test strip and method described herein therefore provide the advantage of extending the upper limit of the dynamic range for detecting and quantitating hCG. When a signal is detected at the second test portion, the presence and/or strength of that signal may be correlated and/or combined with the signal detected at the first test portion; any such co-interpretation permitting the concentration of hCG to be determined quantitatively (or semi-quantitatively) with increased accuracy relative to a test apparatus or method in which only the first test portion is used. This has the advantage of allowing a more accurate determination to be made of the time since implantation of the blastocyst, from which a correlation can be made to the time since conception. Thus, the device, test strip and method disclosed herein can be used to determine the time since conception in a pregnant subject. In addition, the apparatus, test strip and method disclosed herein allows a quantitative or semi-quantitative detection of hCG to be performed.
Furthermore, quantitative or semi-quantitative detection of hCG also gives an indication that hCG levels are increasing at an anticipated rate during pregnancy.
Accordingly, the present disclosure also provides a method of determining time since conception in a subject, said method comprising:
As described herein, the level of hCG in the sample can be determined by determining the presence and/or level of signals at the first and/or second test portion(s). Where signal is present at both the first and second test portions, the level of hCG in the biological sample may be determined by co-interpretation of the combined signals. The concentration of hCG in the sample may be determined quantitatively (or semi-quantitatively). Any discussion herein of the detection of the level and/or amount of hCG is to be interpreted as encompassing the determination of the level of the associated signal.
Based on the level of hCG determined to be in the biological sample, time since conception may be determined in accordance with a level, or one or more ranges of levels, of hCG known to be correlated with specific gestation age. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 5-50 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 25-50 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 3 weeks has elapsed since conception. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 5-426 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 50-426 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 4 weeks has elapsed since conception. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 18-7340 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 426-7340 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 5 weeks has elapsed since conception. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 1,080-56,500 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 7,340-56,500 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 6 weeks has elapsed since conception. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 7,650-229,000 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 56,500-229,000 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 7-8 weeks has elapsed since conception. In one example, a biological sample determined as having a level of hCG in the range of 25,700-288,000 mIU/ml e.g., in the range of 229,000-288,000 mIU/ml, may indicate that up to 9-12 weeks has elapsed since conception. Thus, the apparatus, test strip and method disclosed herein can be used to determine whether up to 3 weeks, up to 4 weeks, up to 5 weeks, up to 6 weeks, up to 7-8 weeks, up to 9-12 weeks, or any other time has elapsed since conception occurred in a pregnant subject.
Whilst the foregoing disclosure is directed to an apparatus and methods for detecting hCG in a sample for the purpose to determining pregnancy, it is recognised that the configuration of the apparatus described herein can be modified to detect other analytes and thereby extend the upper limit of the dynamic range for detecting those other analytes in a sample. Such a modified form of the apparatus would mitigate or reduce inaccuracies in the detection of the analyte owing to the hook effect when the analyte is present in a sample at high levels.
Accordingly, it is envisaged that the apparatus and methods described herein may be modified to accommodate detection of other analytes. For example, in one aspect the present disclosure provides an apparatus for detecting the presence and/or a level of an analyte in a sample from a subject, said apparatus comprising one or more lateral flow test strips comprising:
The one or more lateral flow test strips may be configured such that the second test portion is positioned downstream of the first test portion, and the first test portion is position downstream of the label-holding portion.
The present disclosure also provides a method of detecting a high level of an analyte in a biological sample, said method comprising:
An apparatus in accordance with any aspect disclosed herein may comprise a single test strip or multiple test strips, as required. Where multiple test strips are present, features of the apparatus as disclosed herein may be present in each test strip or may be distributed across multiple test strips. Where multiple test strips are present, those test strips may be configured in series or in parallel. When in parallel, each test strip may be the same or may be different. For example, features of the apparatus as disclosed herein may be distributed across multiple test strips in parallel. The apparatus disclosed herein may comprise two or more test strips in parallel, wherein one of the test strips may be a test strip of the apparatus disclosed herein and the other one or more test strips may be configured to detect the target analyte (e.g., hCG) using a competition assay e.g., as described in WO2005/059547.
The present disclosure also provides use of an apparatus according to one or more aspects disclosed herein to detect pregnancy and/or ovulation in a subject. For example, the apparatus may be used in accordance with a method disclosed herein.
The apparatus according to one or more aspects of the present disclosure may be provided in the form a kit. In one example, a kit may comprise an apparatus according to one or more aspects of the present disclosure and instructions for use.
The apparatus according to one or more aspects of the present disclosure may also be configured to detect early pregnancy in accordance with the Applicant's PCT Publication No. WO2014/047692, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference, such as in the embodiment described at page 18, paragraph [0079] to page 22, paragraph [0092] of WO2014/047692.
The present disclosure also provides a method of producing the apparatus according to one or more aspects disclosed herein. The method may comprise assembling one or more test strips disclosed herein in any one or more configuration disclosed herein.
The present disclosure also provides one or more lateral flow test strips. For example, in one aspect, the present disclosure provides a lateral flow test strip comprising:
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a lateral flow test strip lateral comprising:
The lateral flow tests trips of the preceding two aspects may be as described in conjunction with the apparatus of the preceding aspects.
Throughout this specification the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Tests configured to identify pregnancy based on a level of hCG in a sample typically do so using a hCG threshold level of 20 IU/L which is indicative of pregnancy. Moreover, in some tests, e.g. as disclosed in Applicant's PCT Publication No. WO2014/047692, identification of pregnancy using a hCG threshold level as low as 1 IU/L is disclosed. In general, such tests are therefore configured to detect hCG in biological samples at low levels, as may be the case in the early stages of pregnancy. However, the normal range of hCG in a pregnant woman can be from 1-200,000 IU/L or greater. In a small number of pregnancies, hCG levels can exceed 1,000,000 IU/L, for example. As discussed above, a common problem that limits the usefulness of traditional test devices for identifying pregnancy in biological samples in which hCG is present at high levels, is the phenomenon known as the “hook effect”. The hook effect is a common phenomenon observed in the type of sandwich immunoassay traditionally used in pregnancy test devices when hCG is present in sufficiently high concentrations to cause saturation (to a certain extent) of both the capture and signal antibodies, thereby preventing formation of a “sandwich” as required to generate detectable signal or a signal that is indicative of the true level of hCG present in the sample. Accordingly, traditional pregnancy tests can detect artificially low levels of hCG, and even provide false negative results, when hCG is present in the urine sample at high concentrations.
To mitigate the “hook effect” and allow more accurate detection of pregnancy when hCG is present in high concentrations, the apparatus according to embodiments of the present disclosure is configured to have an increased dynamic range for detection of hCG.
Apparatus
The apparatus according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure comprises one or more lateral flow test strips. Each lateral flow test strip may be formed of any material which permits flow of a liquid sample therethrough by capillary action and which is known to be suitable for use in lateral flow devices. Such materials have been widely used in commercially-available diagnostic tests e.g., pregnancy/conception tests, and will be known to a person skilled in the art. One such exemplary material may be a nitrocellulose membrane.
The one or more test strips may comprise a label-holding portion, a first test portion and a second test portion. The one or more test strips may also comprise a sample receiving portion and/or a control portion. The size of each of the label-holding portion, the first test portion, the second test portion, the sample receiving portion and the control portion may be adapted as necessary. For example, the precise dimensions of each may be adapted according to the particular dimensions of the one or more test strips used and/or the dimensions of the apparatus.
The apparatus may comprise more than one label-holding portion. Alternatively, or in addition, the apparatus may comprise more than one first test portion. Alternatively, or in addition, the apparatus may comprise more than one second test portion. Alternatively or in addition, the apparatus may comprise more than one control portion. Alternatively, or in addition, the apparatus may comprise more than one sample receiving portion.
The provision of more than one first test portion or more than one second test portion may further mitigate the hook effect and/or may allow a further quantitation of the hook effect. These additional test portions may be referred to as third, fourth, fifth, etc. test portions. Each of these additional test portions may comprise an immobilised capture reagent as is present in the first and/or second test portion(s). Preferably, each of these additional test portions comprises an immobilised capture reagent as is present in the second test portion.
The label-holding portion, the first test portion and the second test portion may be configured such that a biological sample taken from a subject contacts the label-holding portion before the first test portion, and such that the biological sample contacts the first test portion before the second test portion. The sample may contact the sample-receiving portion before the label-holding portion. The sample may contact the control portion after contacting the second test portion. Alternative configurations are possible, including configurations where multiple strips are present.
As used herein, the terms “downstream” and “upstream”, when referring to the location of the various portions of the test strip, will be understood to mean relative to the direction of flow of the sample through or along the test strip.
The apparatus according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may also comprise a fluid sink, which may act to draw the sample through or along the one or more test strips.
The apparatus may comprise a single test strip, or multiple test strips. For example, an apparatus comprising multiple test strips may comprise 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or more test strips. The test strips may be arranged in parallel or in a series.
As described herein, the lateral flow test strip of the apparatus may be configured to include one or more capture reagents. Capture reagents used in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be any one of more agents having the capacity to bind an analyte of interest in a sample. For example, the capture reagents may have the capacity to bind hCG specifically, or hCG and one or more of LH, FSH and TSH, as the case may be, to form a binding pair or complex. Some examples of such binding pairs or complexes include, but are not limited to, an antibody and an antigen (wherein the antigen may be, for example, a peptide sequence or a protein sequence); complementary nucleotide or peptide sequences; polymeric acids and bases; dyes and protein binders; peptides and protein binders; enzymes and cofactors, and ligand and receptor molecules, wherein the term receptor refers to any compound or composition capable of recognising a particular molecule configuration, such as an epitopic or determinant site.
The term “immobilised”, as used with respect to a capture reagent, means the reagent is attached to the lateral flow test strip such that lateral flow of fluids through or along the test strip during an assay process will not dislodge the reagent. The capture reagent may be immobilised by any suitable means known in the art. Conversely, the terms “mobilisable” or “removable” is used to indicate that the capture reagent is capable of moving with the biological sample from the label-holding portion to the first and/or second test portion(s) and/or the control portion. The label may be deposited at the label-holding portion prior to use of the apparatus by any suitable means known in the art.
As used herein, the term “specifically binds”, “binds specifically”, “binds to specifically” or similar may refer to a capture reagent that does not bind significantly (e.g., above background binding levels) to any sample components other than the desired component or analyte. Accordingly, a capture reagent which “binds specifically to hCG” may not bind significantly or at all to any other analytes or components in a sample other than hCG, if hCG is in fact present.
The skilled person will be aware that an “antibody” is generally considered to be a protein that comprises a variable region made up of a plurality of immunoglobulin chains, e.g., a polypeptide comprising a VL and a polypeptide comprising a VH. An antibody also generally comprises constant domains, some of which can be arranged into a constant region or constant fragment or fragment crystallizable (Fc). A VII and a VL interact to form a Fv comprising an antigen binding region that is capable of specifically binding to one or a few closely related antigens. Generally, a light chain from mammals is either a κ light chain or a λ light chain and a heavy chain from mammals is α, δ, ε, γ, or μ. Antibodies can be of any type (e.g., IgG, IgE, IgM, IgD, IgA, and IgY), class (e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2) or subclass. The term “antibody” also encompasses humanized antibodies, human antibodies and chimeric antibodies. As used herein, the term “antibody” is also intended to include formats other than full-length, intact or whole antibody molecules, such as Fab, F(ab′)2, and Fv which are capable of binding the epitopic determinant. These formats may be referred to as antibody “fragments”. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, it will be expected that antibody fragments retain some or all of the ability of the corresponding full-length, intact or whole antibody to selectively bind to hCG, or to bind hCG and one or more of LH, FSH and TSH, as required, examples of which include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Fab, the fragment which contains a monovalent binding fragment of an antibody molecule and which can be produced by digestion of whole antibody with the enzyme papain to yield an intact light chain and a portion of one heavy chain;
(2) Fab′, the fragment of an antibody molecule which can be obtained by treating whole antibody with pepsin, followed by reduction, to yield an intact light chain and a portion of the heavy chain; two Fab′ fragments are obtained per antibody molecule;
(3) (Fab′)2, the fragment of the antibody that can be obtained by treating whole antibody with the enzyme pepsin without subsequent reduction; F(ab)2 is a dimer of two Fab′ fragments held together by two disulfide bonds;
(4) Fv, defined as a genetically engineered fragment containing the variable region of the light chain and the variable region of the heavy chain expressed as two chains;
(5) Single chain antibody (“SCA”), defined as a genetically engineered molecule containing the variable region of the light chain, the variable region of the heavy chain, linked by a suitable polypeptide linker as a genetically fused single chain molecule; such single chain antibodies may be in the form of multimers such as diabodies, triabodies, and tetrabodies etc which may or may not be polyspecific (see, for example, WO 94/07921 and WO 98/44001); and
(6) Single domain antibody, typically a variable heavy domain devoid of a light chain.
Accordingly, an antibody used as a capture reagent in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may include separate heavy chains, light chains, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, Fc, a variable light domain devoid of any heavy chain, a variable heavy domain devoid of a light chain and Fv. Such fragments can be produced by recombinant DNA techniques, or by enzymatic or chemical separation of intact immunoglobulins.
The terms “full-length antibody,” “intact antibody” or “whole antibody” are used interchangeably to refer to an antibody in its substantially intact form, as opposed to an antigen binding fragment of an antibody. Specifically, whole antibodies include those with heavy and light chains including a Fc region. The constant domains may be wild-type sequence constant domains (e.g., human wild-type sequence constant domains) or amino acid sequence variants thereof. In some cases, the intact antibody may have one or more effector functions.
An antibody used as a capture reagent in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be a humanized antibody. The term “humanized antibody”, as used herein, refers to an antibody derived from a non-human antibody, typically murine, that retains or substantially retains the antigen-binding properties of the parent antibody but which is less immunogenic in humans.
The immobilised capture reagents of the first and/or second test portion(s) may be antibodies. For example, the immobilised capture reagent of the first test portion may be an antibody configured to bind an epitope specific to hCG. Preferably, an antibody thus configured will not be cross-reactive with other glycoprotein hormones having conserved regions, such as, for example, LH, FSH or TSH, if they are also present in a sample. For example, an antibody used as a capture reagent at the first test portion may be a monoclonal antibody against the β-subunit of hCG.
The immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion may be an antibody which binds an epitope or region which is common to hCG and one or more of LH, FSH and TSH. The immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion may be, for example, an anti-LH antibody capable of binding hCG, an anti-FSH antibody capable of binding hCG, or an anti-TSH antibody capable of binding hCG. In each case, it will be appreciated that the immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion will be configured to bind hCG with a lower affinity than the immobilised capture reagent of the first test portion.
Suitable antibodies for use in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure are commercially available or otherwise known in the art e.g., as disclosed in Nilsson et al., (2001) Journal of Endocrinology, 168:107-116. Furthermore, methods for determining the binding specificity and affinity of antibodies are known in the art, such that a skilled person could readily identify binding reagents which are suitable for use in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.
As described herein, the label holding portion of the lateral flow test strip comprises at least one mobilisable capture reagent configured to bind hCG present in the sample. The mobilisable capture reagent may be conjugated to a detectable label to facilitate detection of hCG in the sample during use of the apparatus.
Where the apparatus is configured to detect and/or quantify a level of a further analyte capable of binding to the immobilised capture reagent of the second test portion e.g., LH or FSH, the label holding portion of the lateral flow test strip may comprise a second mobilisable capture reagent. The second mobilisable capture reagent may be configured to bind to that further analyte and may also be conjugated to a further or different detectable label to facilitate detection of the further analyte and differentiation from hCG. Such may be the case when the apparatus is configured for detecting pregnancy and/or ovulation in a subject.
Suitable detectable labels for use in diagnostic applications are known in the art. Suitable detectable labels for use in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may include, for example, particulate labels, radiolabels, fluorescent labels, enzymatic labels and imaging agents. For example, the labels may comprise latex or gold. For example, the labels may be latex beads (of any colour, including of two or more distinguishable colours). The labels may also be nanoparticles. Any suitable nanoparticle may be used. The labels may be fluorescent labels e.g., a fluorescent molecule. Where the lateral flow test strip incorporates multiple fluorescent molecules, the respective molecules may be selected to fluoresce at different wavelengths e.g., upon excitation by light, to enable differential detection of two or more analytes in the sample (e.g., hCG and LH). The labels may be reflective. Where the lateral flow test strip incorporates multiple reflective molecules, the respective molecules may be selected to reflect light at different wavelengths to enable differential detection of two or more analytes in the sample (e.g., hCG and LH).
The mobilisable capture reagent(s) of the label-holding portion may be conjugated to detectable labels by any means known in the art. For example, the detectable label may be conjugated to the capture reagent via a suitable linker.
The apparatus in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be a device that operates as a single unit. For example, the apparatus may be provided in the form of a hand-held device. The apparatus may be a single-use, disposable, device. Alternatively, the apparatus may be partly or entirely re-usable. While in some embodiments the apparatus may be implemented in a laboratory, the apparatus may designed as a ‘point-of-care’ device, for home use or use in a clinic, etc. The apparatus may provide a rapid-test device, with identification of target conditions being provided to the user relatively quickly, e.g., in under 10 minutes, 5 minutes or under 1 minute
The apparatus of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be configured for use with a variety of different types of biological samples. The sample may be a fluid sample. Biological samples which may be used in accordance with the apparatus and/or method of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure include, for example, blood, serum, plasma, urine, vaginal discharge and/or amniotic fluid. A preferred biological sample which may be used in accordance with the apparatus and/or method of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure is urine. Another preferred sample which may be used in accordance with the apparatus and/or method of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure is blood or component thereof e.g., serum or plasma.
Methods
The apparatus of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a method of determining whether or not a subject is pregnant or ovulating. The methods may be carried out in a home environment or in a laboratory setting, or other environment. The methods may comprise using an apparatus of an embodiment as disclosed herein.
Kits
The apparatus of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be provided in the form a kit. In one example, a kit may comprise an apparatus of an embodiment of the present disclosure and instructions for use. The instructions for use may provide directions for using the apparatus to determine whether or not a subject is pregnant or ovulating in accordance with a method of one or more embodiment of the present disclosure. Alternatively, or in addition, a kit may comprise an apparatus of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure and one or more test strips compatible for use in the apparatus. In this respect, the apparatus may be configured to allow removal of a used test strip from the casing after use and subsequent placement with a new test strip into the casing.
Apparatus, and specifically a test device 1, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, is illustrated in
The test device 1 includes an elongate lateral flow test strip 10 and a casing 11. The test strip 10 is partially housed in the casing 11 with a sampling end 100 of the test strip 10 protruding from an opening 111 in an end surface 112 of the casing 11, allowing urine sample to be received directly thereon. The sampling end 100 of the test strip 10 is coverable by a cap 12. The test device 1 also includes an LCD display 36 visible through an opening 13 in a top surface 113 of the casing 11 for displaying results of testing.
Referring to
The label-holding zone 102 comprises three types of label-conjugated antibodies in this embodiment. The first label-conjugated antibody is designed to bind specifically to hCG, if present, in the urine sample to form a complex with the hCG (hereinafter “labelled hCG complex”). The second label-conjugated antibody is designed to bind specifically to luteinizing hormone (LH), if present, in the urine sample to form a complex with the LH (hereinafter “labelled LH complex”). Accordingly, as the urine sample travels through the label-holding zone 102, hCG present therein binds to the first label-conjugated antibody to form a labelled hCG complex and LH present therein binds to the second label-conjugated antibody to form a labelled LH complex. The third label-conjugated antibody is designed for use as a control. The sample containing the labelled hCG complex, labelled LH complex and/or the control label-conjugated antibody continues to travel though the test strip to the test zone 103 and contact a first test stripe 103a (or other type of test portion) that contains immobilized compounds capable of binding hCG, in particular hyperglycosylated hCG, with high specificity and affinity. In this regard, the immobilised compound may not exhibit any detectable cross-reactivity to LH. On contact, the immobilized compounds in the first test stripe 103a binds to the hCG in the labelled hCG complex to form a labelled hCG sandwich. The urine sample continues through the test strip and contacts a second test stripe 103b that contains immobilized reagents capable of independently binding to both hCG and LH. The immobilized reagents in the second test stripe 103b may have an affinity for binding to hCG that is lower than that of the immobilised reagents in the first test stripe 103a. If sufficient amount of labelled hCG complex is present in the sample, the immobilized reagents in the second test stripe 103b will bind to the hCG complex to form a labelled hCG sandwich. Equally, if sufficient amount of labelled LH complex is present in the sample, the immobilized reagents in the second test stripe 103b will bind to the LH complex to form a labelled LH sandwich. The urine sample will continue through the test zone to contact a control stripe 103c which contains immobilized reagents capable of binding the control label-conjugated antibody.
In this embodiment, the three label-conjugated antibodies are labelled with different types of fluorescent quantum dots (QDs), configured to fluoresce at a different specific emission peak wavelengths following UV light excitation (e.g., first, second and third wavelengths of 525, 625 and 800 nm, respectively). Of course, in alternative embodiments, other types of labels may be used in place of quantum dots, such as latex beads or gold particles, etc., and/or other specific emission peak wavelengths may be used.
In the present embodiment, by illuminating the stripes 103a, 103b, 103c with UV light, the presence of one or more of the different types of the QD labels will result in a detectable light emission with one or more different emission peak wavelengths. The intensity of the light emission (the size of the peaks) for the different wavelengths is indicative of the number of and type of labelled complexes/antibodies bound to the stripes, which is in turn indicative of the prevalence of hCG and/or LH in the sample and the amount of the sample that has reached the control stripe. As such, one or more wavelength sensitive photodetectors, forming part of a reader, can be used in the test device 1 to identify the amounts of hCG and/or LH in the sample through monitoring of the test stripes 103a and 103b. The one or more photodetectors can also be used to determine, through monitoring of the control stripe 103c, that a sufficient amount of sample has travelled through the test stripes 103a and 103b to the control stripe 103c and that binding of the labelled complexes has been successful.
Referring to
In use, the cap 12 is removed from sampling end 100 of the test strip and a urine sample is directed onto the sample receiving zone 101. The cap 12 can be replaced and, after approximately 1 or 2 minutes, giving sufficient time for the lateral flow process to take place, the switch 33 can be depressed, causing flow of electricity from the power supply 32 to the LED 34, resulting in emission of UV light from the LED 34 that is incident on the stripes 103a, 103b, 103c of the test strip 10. The UV light results in excitation of any or all of the different types of quantum dots that may be immobilized as part of the respective labelled complexes at the stripes 103a, 103b, 103c, causing light emission at respective wavelength peaks. In combination with the multi-wavelength photodetector 35, the processor 31 is configured to determine the size of the emission peaks and identify from this (a) if the sample mix has arrived at the control stripe 103c and labelling has been effective, and if yes, identify (b) an amount of hCG present in the sample based on the intensity of light emission detected at test stripe(s) 103a and/or 103b, or (c) an amount of LH present in the sample based on the intensity of light emission detected at test stripe 103b.
While a manual switch 33 is described above, in alternative embodiments, switching may be automated. For example, switching may be configured to occur upon replacement of the cap 12 onto the casing 11 or due to fluid activation, as the sample travels through a fluid-activated switch that may be provided in the device.
The LED may be carefully calibrated to ensure that the light emission from the LED is consistent from one device to the next, ensuring that a degree of excitation of the quantum dots is consistent. Additionally, or alternatively, a calibration mechanism may be integrated into the device. A known quantity of quantum dots, configured to fluoresce at yet another wavelength, may be immobilized on the test strip, e.g. at a further test stripe. Depending on the intensity of the fluorescence detected from the known quantity of quantum dots, the processor may adjust its interpretation of the light emission from quantum dots that label the LH and hCG analytes. Additionally, or alternatively, multiple LEDs may be used to excite the quantum dots with a view to suppressing the overall effect of any rogue LEDs.
If, during use, it is identified there is insufficient amount of sample to reach the control stripe, the processor 31 is configured to cause the display 36 to present the words INVALID TEST. In this respect, the processor 31, in combination with the multi-wavelength photodetector 35, is configured to determine the size of the emission peaks at the control stripe 103c and identify from this (i) if the sample has arrived at the control stripe 103c, and/or (ii) if labelling has been effective.
If, during use, it is identified there is sufficient amount of sample and labelling is effective, the processor 31 is configured to provide a determination of pregnancy or ovulation or neither.
Generally, the processor 31 is configured to: provide a determination of pregnancy if a signal above a threshold level is detected at the first test stripe 103a, but a signal above a threshold level is not detected at the second test stripe 103b; provide a determination of pregnancy if a signal above a threshold level is detected at the first test stripe 103a and a signal above a threshold level is detected at the second test stripe 103b; provide a determination of ovulation if a signal above a threshold level is not detected at the first test stripe 103a, but a signal above a threshold level is detected at the second test stripe 103b; and provide a determination of non-pregnancy and non-ovulation if a signal above a threshold level is not detected at the first test stripe 103a and a signal above a threshold level is not detected at the second test stripe 103b
The determination of ovulation as described above relies on there being no detectable level of signal at the first test stripe 103a. However, if some hCG is also present in the sample, some signal may also be detected at the first test stripe 103a even when the subject is ovulating. Through the use of QD labels configured to fluoresce at a different specific emission peak wavelengths, the device can distinguish between signal present at the second test stripe 103b that result from the presence of hCG or LH in the sample.
The device according to the present embodiment is configured to make a determination of a time since conception based on the levels of signals detected at the first and second test stripes 103a, 103b resulting from the presence of hCG in the sample. Greater levels of hCG in the sample can indicate a greater time since conception. The device can do this while mitigating the hook effect by interpreting the significance of low signal levels at the first test stripe 103a based on signal levels at the second test stripe 103b. The processor may be adapted to apply one or more algorithms to the detected signal levels to make this determination.
As can be seen in
For example, where there are relatively low concentrations of hCG in the sample, with signal levels at a first wavelength and above a predetermined threshold being identified at the first test stripe 103a and not at the second test stripe 103b, the processor can determine the levels of hCG in the sample, and therefore pregnancy and optionally a time since conception, based entirely on the signal level identified at the first test stripe 103a. At these low level concentrations of hCG (e.g. towards the left side of the graph of
Since the device of the present embodiment is a hand-held device, the device may be used at home, both while a woman is trying conceive (or contrarily as a contraceptive device), and also when they are pregnant. The device provides a combined ovulation prediction kit (OPK) and home pregnancy test (HPT).
The device is configured to allow removal of a used test strip from the casing 10, via the opening 111, and allow placement of a new test strip into the casing 10, via the same opening 111. Each time the strip is replaced, an identically configured test strip can be used, regardless of whether a woman is seeking to test for one or both of ovulation or pregnancy. In alternative embodiments, the device may be entirely a single-use device.
The device of this embodiment of the disclosure may also be configured to detect early pregnancy in accordance with the embodiment described at page 18, paragraph to page 22, paragraph [0092] of the Applicant's PCT Publication No. WO2014/047692.
In an alternative embodiment, the device may be substantially the same as described in the preceding embodiment, with the exception that the device is configured to detect hCG only in a sample.
The device of this alternative embodiment comprises only two types of label-conjugated antibodies. The first label-conjugated antibody is designed to bind specifically to hCG, if present, in the urine sample to form a complex with the hCG (hereinafter “labelled hCG complex”). The second label-conjugated antibody is designed for use as a control. Accordingly, as the urine sample travels through the label-holding zone, hCG present therein binds to the first label-conjugated antibody to form a labelled hCG complex. The sample containing the labelled hCG complex and the control label-conjugated antibody continues to travel though the test strip to the test zone and contact a first test stripe that contains immobilized reagents capable of binding hCG, in particular hyperglycosylated hCG, with high specificity and affinity. In this regard, the immobilised reagent does not exhibit any detectable cross-reactivity to LH and therefore does not detectably-bind LH, if present in sample. On contact, the immobilized reagents in the first test stripe bind to the hCG in the labelled hCG complex to form a labelled hCG sandwich. The urine sample will continue through the test strip and contact a second test stripe that contains immobilized reagents capable of binding independently to both hCG and LH. As in the first embodiment, the affinity for binding to hCG may be lower for the immobilised reagents in the second test stripe than the reagents contained in the first test stripe. If a sufficient amount of labelled hCG complex is present in the sample, the immobilized reagents in the second test stripe will bind to the hCG complex to form a labelled hCG sandwich. If any LH is present in the sample, the immobilized reagents in the second test stripe will bind the LH. However, LH will be in an unlabelled form and therefore non-detectable. The urine sample may then continue through the test zone to contact a control stripe which contains immobilized reagents capable of binding the control label-conjugated antibody.
The reading apparatus of the device of this embodiment is the same as that described in the previous embodiment with reference to
In this example, the inventors demonstrated the ability of an exemplary lateral flow test strip in accordance with the disclosure to detect hCG across a range of concentrations. The inventors demonstrated that a “hook effect” clearly occurs when hCG is present in a test sample at intermediate to high concentrations, and that a lateral flow test strip configured in accordance with the disclosure and described in this example can mitigate the “hook effect” thereby extending the dynamic range for detecting hCG.
Methods
Reagents used in this experiment were as follows:
Briefly, test strips were prepared by laminating the 300 mm sections of nitrocellulose membrane, conjugate release pad (representing the “label holding portion) and sample pad (representing the “sample receiving portion”) components onto an adhesive backing card using a standard laminator to achieve precise overlaps at the junctions of the three different materials. The assembled 300 mm cards were then slit into 4 mm wide test strips and configured in accordance with
Activity of the hCG antigen was confirmed as 12 492 IU/mg by the supplier using an ELISA. 1 mg of hCG antigen reconstituted in 2 ml PBS therefore produced a sample with 6,246,000 mIU/ml. Based on this activity, a series of test samples with varying concentrations of hCG were prepared by diluting the hCG antigen in PBS buffer according to the dilutions set out in Table 1.
For each test sample in the dilution series, 150 μl of test sample was added to the sample receiving portion of a separate test strip and the test strip was left to incubate at ambient temperature for 10 minutes (each dilution in the series was tested in replicates of five).
After the incubation period, the test strips were evaluated by visual inspection. The amount of light absorbed at the test and control capture zones was then quantified for each of the test strips using a TLC4 Scanner (CAMAG Scientific Inc.). A representative CAMAG scan is provided in
Peak signal intensities at the anti-hCG and anti-LH capture zones were then plotted for each of the hCG antigen dilutions tested (
Results
As is apparent from
As is apparent from
Whilst this experiment was performed using an anti-LH antibody as the capture reagent to bind hCG with a lower affinity than that of the anti-hCG antibody, it will be appreciated that other antibodies or binding proteins which are cross-reactive with hCG may be used (for example and without limitation, an anti-FSH antibody, anti-TSH antibody) as an alternative to the anti-LH antibody. Similarly, it will be apparent to skilled person that alternative configurations of the test strip in accordance with the disclosure herein may be employed.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015900186 | Jan 2015 | AU | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AU2016/050037 | 1/22/2016 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016/115608 | 7/28/2016 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4338305 | Corbin | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4999287 | Allen et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5418136 | Miller et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5503985 | Cathey et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5525520 | Dinh | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5629214 | Crosby | May 1997 | A |
| 5783399 | Childs et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786220 | Pronovost et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5824268 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5902982 | Lappe | May 1999 | A |
| 5939252 | Lennon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942407 | Liotta et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5998220 | Chandler | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6033627 | Sheilds et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6136610 | Polito | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6248294 | Nason | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6267722 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6319665 | Zwanziger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319965 | Kamohara et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6352862 | Davis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365417 | Fleming et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6454705 | Cosentino et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6549275 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6627459 | Tung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6656745 | Cole | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6764849 | Small et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6886864 | Nelson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6991940 | Carroll et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6998273 | Fleming et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7044919 | Catt et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7070920 | Spivey et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7214542 | Hutchinson | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7220597 | Zin et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7279136 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7280201 | Helbing | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7300800 | Bell et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7315378 | Phelan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7459314 | Guo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7460222 | Kalveram et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7486396 | Oldham et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7488450 | Matusewicz et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7489403 | Lin et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7553453 | Gu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7616315 | Sharrock et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7651851 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7682801 | Esfandiari | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688440 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7740801 | Saini et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7763454 | Nazareth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7803322 | Barich et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7815854 | Cohen | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7879597 | Esfandiari | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7879624 | Sharrock | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7927561 | Kirakossian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7941376 | Peckover | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8003060 | Cracauer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8018593 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8030091 | Jerome et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8040494 | Ermantraut et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8093057 | Choi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101431 | McDevitt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105552 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105794 | Shaari | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105849 | McDevitt et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110392 | Battrel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8128871 | Petruno et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8133671 | Williams et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 20010021536 | Lee | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004246 | Daniels et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020031839 | McNierney et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111741 | Abraham-Fuchs et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030032199 | Meusel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030049175 | Buechler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119030 | Zilber | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019301 | Wong et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040119591 | Peeters | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151632 | Badley et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050095697 | Bachur et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130120 | Lambotte et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136553 | Kaylor et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196318 | Matusewicz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208593 | Vail et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221505 | Petruno et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019265 | Song et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019404 | Blatt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025732 | Ying et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216832 | Nishikawa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246513 | Bohannon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060257992 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060263244 | Rannikko et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015285 | Catt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070020274 | Cole | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031283 | Davis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070081920 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184495 | Shaari | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231923 | Cumberland et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298436 | Lappe | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080102473 | Fouquet et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113391 | Gibbons et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113427 | Kikta | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213920 | Nazareth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311003 | Chiu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090027501 | Elangovan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090035743 | Minter et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061507 | Ho | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061534 | Sharrock | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155811 | Natan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192820 | Bodlaender et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090196792 | Raj et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197296 | Martin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202388 | Matusewicz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263905 | Scheuringer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090280576 | Donati | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298059 | Gumbrecht et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090314946 | Song et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100009430 | Wan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055721 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087749 | Tovey | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121156 | Yoo | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100135857 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100176279 | Lai | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100239460 | Nazareth et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240149 | Nazareth et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248277 | Gibbons et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272635 | Rodems | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291588 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304397 | Burns et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110038767 | Baril | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151584 | Esfandiari | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178723 | Sharrock et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195441 | Hemker et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213564 | Henke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213579 | Henke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213619 | Henke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110266462 | Doi | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294199 | Bearinger et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120015448 | Sharrock | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096400 | Cho | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129272 | Petruno et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130065321 | Nazareth | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096400 | Dahl et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280795 | Dahl et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140296667 | Dahl et al. | Oct 2014 | A9 |
| 20150094227 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150204891 | Parsons | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150241455 | Parsons | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2496986 | Oct 2005 | CA |
| 2802318 | Jan 2012 | CA |
| 101137897 | Mar 2008 | CN |
| 101551398 | Oct 2009 | CN |
| 1051616 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1484601 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1918708 | May 2008 | EP |
| 1718973 | Sep 2009 | EP |
| 2385363 | Nov 2011 | EP |
| 2929407 | Oct 2009 | FR |
| H10-132817 | May 1998 | JP |
| 2009085839 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| H11-281645 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2002510799 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 3496154 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| WO 1995016207 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| WO 1995033996 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 1996034287 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 1999006827 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999056111 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 2001098783 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002088739 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004003527 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005031355 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005059547 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005075982 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005084534 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005111579 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006091631 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099191 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006119203 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006129761 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007049157 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2006100415 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007132375 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007132376 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008001279 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2010015843 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010055308 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010148252 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011091473 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011154918 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012010454 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012044530 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013036913 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 20014047692 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014085926 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2015049508 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015121661 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adejuwon et al. (1984) “Daily serum choriogonadotropin concentrations in early human gestation”; Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 22(2); pp. 125-129. |
| Cole et al. (2009) “Background hCG in non-pregnant individuals: need for more sensitive point-of-care and over-the-counter pregnancy tests”; Clinical Biochemistry 42(3); pp. 168-175. |
| Cole et al. ( 2009) “Normal production of human chorionic gonadotropin in perimenopausal and menopausal women and after oophorectomy”; International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 19(9); pp. 1556-1559. |
| Cole et al. (2009) “Production of human chorionic gonadotropin during the normal menstrual cycle”; The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 54(4); pp. 245-250. |
| Cook et al. “Printed Circuit Board Tracking with RFID: Speed Efficiency and Productivity Made Simple”; Texas Instruments RFID White Paper (Feb. 2008); 9 pages. |
| Corker et al (1976) “Hormonal patterns in conceptual cycles and early pregnancy”; British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 83(6); pp. 489-494. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14783290.1 dated Sep. 15, 2016. |
| Gronowski et al (2008) “Use of serum FSH to identify perimenopausal women with pituitary hCG”; Clinical Chemistry 54(4); pp. 652-656. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/AU2011/000085 dated May 18, 2011 (7 Pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/AU2013/001115 dated Dec. 17, 2013 (14 pages). |
| Jia et al. (1993) “Luminescence Luteinizing Hormone/Choriogonadotropin (LH/CG) Bioassay: Measurement of Serum Bioactive LH/CG during Early Pregnancy in Human and Macaque”; Biology of Reproduction, vol. 49, Issue 6; pp. 1310-1316. |
| Liu et al. (2007) “Disposable electrochemical immunosensor diagnosis device based on nanoparticle probe and immunochromatographic strip”; Anal Chern. 79(20); 7644-7653. |
| Mishell Jr. et al. (1974) “Hormone patterns in early human gestation”; Basic Life Sciences.4(PT. B):371-384. |
| Mishell Jr. et al. (1973) “Serum gonadotropin and steroid patterns in early human gestation”; American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 117(5); pp. 631-642. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 2 for Australian Patent Application No. 2013204428 dated Jan. 20, 2016 (7 pgs.). |
| Rowe et al. (1999) “An array immunosensor for simultaneous detection of clinical analytes”; Anal Chem. 71(2); pp. 433-439. |
| Snyder et al (2005) “Diagnostic considerations in the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin in aging women”; Clinical Chemistry 51(10); pp. 1830-1835. |
| “Understanding Your Ovulation Cycle Female Menstrual Cycle Step by Step”; The Fertility Realm online. Jul. 9 2012. http://www.thefertilityrealm.com/ovulation-cycle.html]. Internet Archive. [www.https://web.archive.org/.veb/20120709173120/http:www.thefertilityrealm.com/ovulation-cycle.html] Accessed Jan. 13, 2016. (4 pages). |
| Wide L.; “Early Diagnosis of Pregnancy”; The Lancet, vol. 294, Issue 7626; Oct. 25, 1969, pp. 863-864. |
| Young et al. (2003) “Development of an ultrarapid one-step fluorescence immunochromatographic assay system for the quantification of microcystins”; Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (9); 1899-19904. |
| Nilsson et al. (2001) “Immunological characterization of human luteinizing hormone with special regard to a common genetic variant”; Journal of Endocrinology 168; pp. 107-116. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180008239 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
