Claims
- 1. A method of diagnosing myocardial ischemia in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said BNP level to the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia in said patient.
- 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said sample is obtained from said patient following stress testing.
- 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP level to a threshold BNP level, whereby, when said BNP level exceeds said threshold BNP level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein said threshold BNP level is at least about 60 pg/mL.
- 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 6. A method according to claim 2, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP level to a second BNP level measured in a second sample obtained from said patient, whereby, when said BNP level is greater than said second BNP level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 7. A method according to claim 2, wherein said second sample is obtained prior to stress testing.
- 8. A method of diagnosing myocardial ischemia in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of a marker related to BNP in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said BNP-related marker level to the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia in said patient.
- 9. A method according to claim 8, wherein said sample is obtained from said patient following stress testing.
- 10. A method according to claim 8, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP-related marker level to a threshold BNP-related marker level, whereby, when said BNP-related marker level exceeds said threshold BNP-related marker level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 11. A method according to claim 10, wherein said threshold BNP-related marker level is at least about 60 pg/mL.
- 12. A method according to claim 8, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 13. A method according to claim 9, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP-related marker level to a second BNP-related marker level measured in a second sample obtained from said patient, whereby, when said BNP-related marker level is greater than said second BNP-related marker level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 14. A method according to claim 13, wherein said second sample is obtained prior to stress testing.
- 15. A method according to any one of claims 8-14, wherein said BNP-related marker is NT pro-BNP.
- 16. A method of diagnosing myocardial ischemia in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of a diagnostic indicator selected from the group consisting of BNP and a marker related to BNP in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said diagnostic indicator level to the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia in said patient.
- 17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said sample is obtained from said patient following stress testing.
- 18. A method according to claim 16, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said diagnostic indicator level to a threshold level of said diagnostic indicator, whereby, when said diagnostic indicator level level exceeds said threshold diagnostic indicator level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 19. A method according to claim 18, wherein said threshold diagnostic indicator level is at least about 60 pg/mL.
- 20. A method according to claim 16, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 21. A method according to claim 17, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said diagnostic indicator level to a second diagnostic indicator level measured in a second sample obtained from said patient, wherein said second diagnostic indicator is selected from the group consisting of BNP and a marker related to BNP, whereby, when said diagnostic indicator level is greater than said second diagnostic indicator level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial ischemia.
- 22. A method according to claim 17, wherein said second sample is obtained prior to stress testing.
- 23. A method of diagnosing myocardial necrosis in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said BNP level to the presence or absence of myocardial necrosis in said patient.
- 24. A method according to claim 23, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP level to a threshold BNP level, whereby, when said BNP level exceeds said threshold BNP level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial necrosis.
- 25. A method according to claim 24, wherein said threshold BNP level is at least about 60 pg/mL.
- 26. A method according to claim 23, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 27. A method of diagnosing myocardial necrosis in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of a marker related to BNP in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said BNP-related marker level to the presence or absence of myocardial necrosis in said patient.
- 28. A method according to claim 27, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP level to a threshold BNP level, whereby, when said BNP level exceeds said threshold BNP level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial necrosis.
- 29. A method according to claim 28, wherein said threshold BNP level is at least about 80 pg/mL.
- 30. A method according to claim 27, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 31. A method according to any one of claims 27-30, wherein said BNP-related marker is NT pro-BNP.
- 32. A method of diagnosing myocardial necrosis in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a level of a diagnostic indicator selected from the group consisting of BNP and a marker related to BNP in a sample obtained from said patient; and correlating said diagnostic indicator level to the presence or absence of myocardial necrosis in said patient.
- 33. A method according to claim 32, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said BNP level to a threshold BNP level, whereby, when said BNP level exceeds said threshold BNP level, said patient is diagnosed as having myocardial necrosis.
- 34. A method according to claim 33, wherein said threshold BNP level is at least about 80 pg/mL.
- 35. A method according to claim 32, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 36. A method of diagnosing myocardial ischemia in a patient, the method comprising:
determining a first diagnostic indicator selected from the group consisting of a level of BNP and a level of a marker related to BNP in a sample obtained from said patient; determining one or more second diagnostic indicators in said patient; and correlating said first and said second diagnostic indicators to the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia in said patient.
- 37. A method according to claim 36, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 38. A method according to claim 36, wherein said second diagnostic indicator(s) are selected from the group consisting of an MMP-9 level, a TpP level, an MCP-1 level, an H-FABP level, a CRP level, a creatine kinase level, an MB isoenzyme level, a cardiac troponin I level, a cardiac troponin T level, and a level of complexes comprising cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T.
- 39. A method according to claim 36, wherein one or more of said second diagnostic indicators a necrosis marker.
- 40. A method according to claim 39, wherein said method distinguishes between myocardial necrosis and myocardial ischemia in said patient.
- 41. A method of diagnosing an acute coronary syndrome, said method comprising analyzing a test sample obtained from a patient for the presence or amount of one or more specific markers for myocardial injury and one or more non-specific markers for myocardial injury.
- 42. A method according to claim 41, wherein said specific marker for myocardial injury is selected from the group consisting of annexin V, B-type natriuretic peptide, β-enolase, cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, glycogen phosphorylase-BB, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, phosphoglyceric acid mutase-MB, and S-100ao.
- 43. A method according to claim 41, wherein said non-specific marker for myocardial injury is selected from the group consisting of a marker of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, a marker of coagulation, C-reactive protein, caspase-3, hemoglobin α2, human lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase, interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, MMP-9, TpP, and tumor necrosis factor a.
- 44. A method according to claim 43, wherein said marker of atherosclerotic plaque rupture is selected from the group consisting of human neutrophil elastase, inducible nitric oxide synthase, lysophosphatidic acid, malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoprotein, matrix metalloproteinase-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-3, and matrix metalloproteinase-9.
- 45. A method according to claim 43, wherein said marker of coagulation is selected from the group consisting of β-thromboglobulin, D-dimer, fibrinopeptide A, platelet-derived growth factor, plasmin-α-2-antiplasmin complex, platelet factor 4, prothrombin fragment 1+2, P-selectin, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, thrombus precursor protein, tissue factor, and von Willebrand factor.
- 46. A method according to claim 41, further comprising,
comparing the level of said specific and non-specific markers to the level of said specific and non-specific markers in normal individuals, wherein changes in said levels in the test sample obtained from a patient as compared to normal individuals is indicative of a patient who has experienced an onset of acute coronary syndrome.
- 47. A method according to claim 45, wherein an elevation in the level of at least two of said specific and non-specific markers in the test sample obtained from a patient as compared to normal individuals is indicative of a patient who has experienced an onset of acute coronary syndrome.
- 48. A method of screening a patient experiencing constricting chest pain for an acute coronary syndrome, said method comprising
analyzing a test sample obtained from a patient for the presence or amount of one or more specific markers for myocardial injury and one or more non-specific markers for myocardial injury, comparing the level of said specific and non-specific markers to the level of said specific and non-specific markers in normal individuals, wherein changes in said levels in said test sample obtained from a patient as compared to normal individuals is indicative of a potential victim of acute coronary syndrome.
- 49. A method according to claim 41, wherein said test sample is selected from the group consisting of blood, serum, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, urine and saliva.
- 50. A method according to claim 41, wherein said test sample is fractionated prior to being analyzed.
- 51. A method according to claim 41, wherein said test sample is analyzed using an immunoassay.
- 52. A method according to claim 41, further comprising distinguishing amongst stable angina, unstable angina and myocardial infarction.
- 53. A method according to claim 41, wherein the method diagnoses stable angina.
- 54. A method according to claim 41, wherein the method diagnoses unstable angina.
- 55. A method according to claim 41, wherein the method diagnoses myocardial infarction.
- 56. A method of monitoring a course of treatment in a patient, said method comprising:
analyzing and comparing a plurality of test samples obtained from said patient for the presence or amount of one or more specific markers for myocardial injury and one or more non-specific markers for myocardial injury, wherein said test samples are obtained from the same patient at different times.
- 57. A method according to claim 56, wherein said patient shows signs or symptoms of stable angina.
- 58. A method according to claim 56, wherein said patient shows signs or symptoms of unstable angina.
- 59. A method according to claim 56, wherein said patient shows signs or symptoms of myocardial infarction.
- 60. A method of determining a prognosis of a patient diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, the method comprising:
correlating a level of one or more markers selected from the group consisting of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9), an MMP-9-related marker, TpP, MCP-1, H-FABP, C-reactive protein, creatine kinase, MB isoenzyme, cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T, complexes comprising cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T, and B-type natriuretic protein in a sample obtained from said patient to said patient prognosis by determining if said marker level(s) is(are) associated with a predisposition to an adverse outcome of said acute coronary syndrome.
- 61. A method according to claim 60, wherein said adverse outcome is selected from the group consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
- 62. A method according to claim 61, wherein said correlating step comprises comparing said marker level(s) to threshold marker level(s), whereby, when said marker level(s) exceed said threshold marker level(s), said patient is predisposed to said adverse outcome.
- 63. A method according to claim 60, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
- 64. A method according to claim 60, comprising correlating a level of two or more markers selected from the group consisting of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9), an MMP-9-related marker, TpP, MCP-1, H-FABP, C-reactive protein, creatine kinase, MB isoenzyme, cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T, complexes comprising cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T, and B-type natriuretic protein in a sample obtained from said patient to said patient prognosis by determining if said marker levels are associated with a predisposition to an adverse outcome of said acute coronary syndrome.
- 65. A method according to claim 60, comprising correlating a level of three or more markers selected from the group consisting of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9), an MMP-9-related marker, TpP, MCP-1, H-FABP, C-reactive protein, creatine kinase, MB isoenzyme, cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T, complexes comprising cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T, and B-type natriuretic protein in a sample obtained from said patient to said patient prognosis by determining if said marker levels are associated with a predisposition to an adverse outcome of said acute coronary syndrome.
- 66. A method of determining a prognosis of a patient diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, the method comprising:
correlating a level of one or more prognostic markers selected from the group consisting of MMP-9, an MMP-9-related marker, BNP, a BNP-related marker, C-reactive protein, free cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin I in a complex comprising one other troponin component selected from the group consisting of troponin T and troponin C, cardiac troponin I in a complex comprising troponin T and troponin C, free cardiac troponin T, cardiac troponin T in a complex comprising one other troponin component selected from the group consisting of troponin I and troponin C, cardiac troponin T in a complex comprising troponin I and troponin C, MCP-1, an MCP-1 related marker, H-FABP, an H—FABP related marker, TpP, a TpP related marker in a sample obtained from said patient to said patient prognosis by determining if one or more marker or related marker level is associated with a predisposition to an adverse outcome of said acute coronary syndrome.
- 67. A method according to claim 66, wherein said adverse outcome is selected from the group consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
- 68. A method according to claim 66, wherein said sample is selected from the group consisting of a blood sample, a serum sample, and a plasma sample.
Parent Case Info
[0001] This application is related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/288,871, filed on May 4, 2001 (Atty Docket No. 071949-6501); and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/315,642, filed on Aug. 28, 2001 (Atty Docket No. 071949-5501), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Provisional Applications (2)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
|
60288871 |
May 2001 |
US |
|
60315642 |
Aug 2001 |
US |