This application is a 371 of PCT/EP02/10848 filed Sep. 27, 2002.
The world-wide production of chlorine, about 45 millions of tons per year, is carried out in electrolytic cells of various types, one of the most relevant being the diaphragm electrolysis cell, whereby about 22 millions of tons per year of chlorine are produced.
An electrolysis diaphragm cell is generally made of four main parts, as widely known to the experts of the art: a copper anodic base lined with a protective titanium sheet, an anodic package made of a multiplicity of anodes arranged in parallel rows and secured to the base, an iron cathodic body comprising a plurality of cathodes with a semipermeable diaphragm deposited thereon, fixed to a current distributor and arranged in parallel rows interposed to the anodes according to a so-called “finger-type” geometry, and a cover, usually made of chlorine-resistant plastic material provided with inlets for feeding brine and outlets for discharging the product chlorine.
In consideration of the high number of operating cells (about 25,000 in the world), of the high amount of energy required for their operation (about 60 millions of MWh/year) and of the continuous increase in the cost of electric energy, the diaphragm cell technology has been considerably improved during these years. Among the various technological improvements contributing to reducing the energy consumption, the following should be mentioned:
As can be observed, the above mentioned improvements are all directed to obtain better performances in terms of energy consumption by increasing the electrocatalytic activity, or by optimising the electrode structure, or again by decreasing the interelectrodic gap and increasing the mass transfer (lower bubble effect and higher electrolyte circulation) achieved by small modifications which do not imply a substantial redesigning of the cell structure and thus can be easily applied with reduced costs.
In many cases, however, it would be preferable to lower the energy consumption by increasing the electrodic surface while keeping the same current load, thereby decreasing the current density and consequently the cell voltage. This situation is typically experienced in the operation of existing cells, due to variations in the price of electric energy, or to the incoming availability of electrical components capable of withstanding a greater load. This can be particularly critical in case of lack of available space on the plant site for installing new electrolytic cells in addition to the existing ones. For this reason, in the past, several solution involving the modification of the cell structure, and in particular of the anodic package and of the cathodic body, have been proposed. Although these improvements entail a very significant energy saving, in the same range of the previously mentioned ones or even higher, they are of lower relevance and commercial success as they involve remarkable modifications of the internal cell structure or variations of the external dimensions, implying strong investment costs and long construction and pay-back times. Among these solutions, the following can be mentioned:
No external modifications are conversely required. This method may be applied when there is sufficient space for reducing the finger pitch and is generally applicable to cells of the old technology, conceived for operation with graphite anodes and thus having a higher pitch between one finger and the next; commonly, the increase in the surface that can be achieved does not exceed 2-5% of the existing surface. The investment is economically viable when the cathodic package has to be substituted at the end of its lifetime, which usually happens every 6-8 years. The retrofitting times are therefore long.
This technique implies substantial modifications inside the cell, including the complete substitution of the cathodic body and the substitution or modification of the existing anodes.
Small modifications are required also outside the cell, especially as concerns the hydraulic connections, even though they are not very significant from an economic standpoint; however this method, although offering the advantage of a greater increase of the electrodic surface (5-15%), is much more expensive and has very long retrofitting times: it is therefore economically interesting only when the cathodic package must be in any case relpaced being close to the end of its operating lifetime (every 12-16 years).
As a conclusion, the two latter methods, although easily applicable from a technical standpoint, have the great disadvantage of being very expensive and entailing long retrofitting times, posing problems of pay-back and being economically convenient only in case of a concurrent substitution of the anodic package or cathodic body. It is an object of the present invention to provide a diaphragm electrolytic cell for chlor-alkali production which overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art.
In particular, it is an object of the present invention to provide a diaphragm electrolytic cell having an increased electrodic area.
Under another aspect, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for obtaining a diaphragm electrolytic cell having an increased electrodic area starting from a conventional cell.
Under another aspect, the invention comprises an electrolytic diaphragm cell including a plurality of anodic packages arranged on a plurality of overlaid planes. Under a further aspect, the invention comprises a method for increasing the electrodic active area of a diaphragm cell without replacing or removing the pre-existing anodic and cathodic packages.
Under a further aspect, the invention comprises a method for increasing the active area of a diaphragm cell wherein the base surface of the cell is maintained constant.
According to a preferred embodiment, the cell of the invention comprises a plurality of modules, each one defined by interdigitated anodic and cathodic packages. The height of the various modules may vary while the number of anodes and cathodes and the pitch thereof is preferably constant. Preferably, the modules are mutually overlaid so that a direct geometric correspondence is established between the anodes and cathodes of the different modules. In a preferred embodiment, the modules are two, the upper module having a lower height than the lower module. According to a preferred embodiment, the different modules are electrically connected in parallel. According to a preferred embodiment, the modules are hydraulically connected in series. According to a preferred embodiment, the diaphragm is a semipermeable diaphragm made of asbestos or of a synthetic material. According to another embodiment, the diaphragm is an ion-exchange membrane.
According to a preferred embodiment, the method of the invention comprises increasing the active surface of an electrolytic diaphragm cell of the conventional type by installing a new module comprising a new anodic package and a new cathodic package overlaid to the pre-existing anodic and cathodic packages. According to a preferred embodiment, the new module is installed between the pre-existing anodic body and the cover of the cell whose the surface is to be expanded.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the new module is electrically connected in series to the pre-existing module. According to a further preferred embodiment, the new module is hydraulically connected in series to the pre-existing module.
According to a preferred embodiment, the new module comprises an anodic package and a cathodic package substantially having the same pitches as those of the existing anodic and cathodic packages, with a lower height.
Under one aspect, the cost reduction is given by the fact that the new method does not imply any modification or substitution of the pre-existing electrodic packages, which in a preferred embodiment represent about 60-70% of the total. As a matter of fact, the costs are substantially proportional to the required surface increase, in other words to the height of the new module and of the electric bars.
The invention will be more easily understood making reference to the enclosed figures, but it is evident that an expert of the field will easily identify several equivalent solutions in addition to those illustrated herein.
Making reference to
Making reference to
The cell of the invention, optionally obtained from a pre-existing cell according to the method of the present invention, operates as follows: the feed brine enters the cell through the inlet nozzle (10) placed on the cell cover and is distributed through pipe (23) to the base of the anodic compartment, subsequently rising to the top surface thereof and overflowing through the slots to the new anodic base (15). The chlorine evolved in the lower anodic compartment follows the same path and leaves through the outlet nozzle (9) on the cover (8). The chloride depleted electrolyte, driven by the pressure corresponding to the hydraulic head between the anolyte and catholyte, permeates through the diaphragm entering the upper (20) and lower (5) cathodic compartments. Hydrogen leaves the upper (21) and lower (7) cathodic compartments respectively through nozzles (25) and (11), connected in parallel to the hydrogen manifold (26). The alkali produced in the upper cathodic compartment (21) leaves through nozzle (27), and enters the lower cathodic chamber (7) through pipe (28) and nozzle (29), where it mixes with the alkali produced therein, then leaving the cell through the hydraulic head (12). In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the level of the cathodic liquor is adjusted so that a sufficient gas chamber is always maintained in the lower cathodic compartment (7); consequently, the upper compartment (21) works exclusively as a gas chamber and electrolysis takes place only by direct contact between the solution percolating onto the diaphragm and the cathode. To establish such condition in a reliable fashion, the pipe (28) must obviously have a sufficient large diameter in order to remain substantially full of hydrogen, so that the two cathodic compartments (7) and (21) are subjected to an identical pressure.
A test was carried out in a diaphragm cell type MDC-55, commercialised by Eltech Systems Corporation, U.S.A., which represents one of the most common industrial cells currently operating. Before the retrofitting, the cell was operated at the following conditions:
The diaphragm was asbestos modified with SM-2, a polymeric material commercialised by Eltech Systems Corporation, U.S.A., known to the experts in the field for this use.
The cell was modified by installing a new module with a height of about 160 mm, in order to increase the electrodic surface by about 20% (from 55 to 66 m2), with the aim of reducing the current density from 2.65 to 2 kA/m2. The resulting voltage reduction was 0.3 V, corresponding to an energy saving of about 240 kWh/ton Cl2 (8.6% of the total consumption).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2001A2003 | Sep 2001 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/10848 | 9/27/2002 | WO | 00 | 3/18/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/029522 | 4/10/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4118306 | De Nora | Oct 1978 | A |
4137136 | Ueda et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4197179 | Ezzell et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4236983 | Minz et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4402810 | Boulton et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 03074765 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040238351 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |