The present invention relates generally to a micro-electroacoustic device, and more particularly to a diaphragm of a micro-electroacoustic device.
Sound is one important means by which people communicate with each other, thus creating new methods for sound transference allows greater communication between people. Electroacoustic transducers are key components in transferring sound. A typical electroacoustic transducer has a magnetic circuit in which a magnetic field generated by a magnet passes through a base member, a magnetic core and a diaphragm and returns to the magnet again. When an oscillating electric current is supplied to a coil wound around the magnetic core, the corresponding oscillating magnetic field generated by the coil is then superimposed onto the magnetostatic field of the magnetic circuit. The resulting oscillation generated in the diaphragm is then transmitted to the air as sound. The basic loudspeaker, in which electric energy is converted to acoustic energy, is a typical electroacoustic transducer. There are many different types of loudspeakers, including electrostatic loudspeakers, piezoelectric loudspeakers, and moving-coil loudspeakers.
Nowadays, mobile phones are widely used and loudspeakers are important components packaged within mobile phones. As design style for mobile phones emphasizes lightness, thinness, shortness, smallness, energy-efficiency, low cost, the space available for loudspeakers within mobile phones is therefore limited. Furthermore, as more and more mobile phones are being used to play MP3s, the rated power of the loudspeakers needs to increase. The space occupied by loudspeakers mainly depends on maximum deformation displacement of a diaphragm of the loudspeaker.
Therefore, it is desired to design a new diaphragm for micro-electroacoustic transducers which can have a reduced deformation displacement when a rated power (force) exerted to the diaphragm is unchanged or even increased.
A diaphragm for a micro-electroacoustic transducer in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises a first layer including an exposed region and a covered region. A second layer overlaps the covered region of the first layer to thereby increase the rigidity of the diaphragm. The maximum deformation displacement of the diaphragm is accordingly reduced compared with conventional diaphragms when undergoing a same power (force). Thus, loudspeakers fitted with the diaphragms of the present invention occupy a smaller space than loudspeakers with conventional diaphragms while can have the same power output. Understandably and alternatively, loudspeakers fitted with the diaphragms of the present invention and occupying the same amount of space as loudspeakers fitted with conventional diaphragms can undergo larger amounts of power input (force) and can have larger power output. This is due to the rigidity of the diaphragm in the present invention being larger than that of the conventional diaphragm.
Other advantages and novel features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference will now be made to the drawing figures to describe the preferred embodiment in detail.
Generally, the thickness of a diaphragm of a micro-electroacoustic is measured in microns while the diameter of the diaphragm is measured in millimeters.
In order to test the effect of the second layer 14 on the diaphragm 10, the applicant has used a variety of kinds of second layers 14 with different thicknesses to overlap the same first layer 12. The thickness of the first layer 12 is 30 um and the diameter thereof is 20 mm. The diameters of the second layers 14 are all 10 mm. The thicknesses of the second layers 14 are 0.1˜2.0 times of that of the first layer 12. Other conditions for conducting the tests are the same. Table 1 shows the results of the tests.
From table 1, one can conclude that the thicker the second layer 14 is the smaller the maximum deformation of the diaphragm 10 is. That is, the rigidity of the diaphragm 10 is increased when the thickness of the second layer 14 increases. Similarly, when the thickness of the first layer increases the rigidity of the diaphragm 10 is also increased.
In order to test the effect of the second layer 14 on the diaphragm 10, the applicant has used a variety of kinds of second layers 14 with different densities. The second layers 14 overlap the same first layer 12. The thickness of the first layer 12 is 30 um and the diameter of the first layer 12 is 20 mm. The first layer 12 is made of polymer material. The diameters of the second layers 14 are all 10 mm and the thicknesses of the second layers 14 are all 30 um. The density of the second layer 14 is 0.1˜2.0 times of that of the first layer 12. Other conditions for conducting the tests are the same. Table 2 shows the results of the tests.
Table 2 shows that as the density ratio of the second layer 14 to the first layer 12 is increased the rigidity of the diaphragm 10 increases also, which results in the maximum deformation displacement of the diaphragm 10 being reduced when the density of the second layer 14 is increased. [0016]
In the present invention, the diaphragms 10, 20, 30 comprise a central portion and a peripheral portion. The ridigity of the central portion is made larger than that of the peripheral portion either by increasing the thickness of the central portion or by increasing the density of the material of the central portion, which results in the rigidity of the diaphragm 10, 20, 30 being increased and the maximum deformation displacement of the diaphragm 10, 20, 30 being accordingly reduced when undergoing the same power input (force). Thus, the loudspeakers fitted with the diaphragms 10, 20, 30 of the present invention occupy smaller space than loudspeakers using conventional diaphragms. Understandably, loudspeakers fitted with the diaphragms 10, 20, 30 of the present invention and occupying the same space as the loudspeakers fitted with conventional diaphragms can undergo larger amounts of power input (force) and accordingly can generate larger power output. This is due to the rigidity of the diaphragm of the present invention being larger than that of a conventional diaphragm.
It is believed that the present invention and its advantages will be understood from the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the examples hereinbefore described merely being preferred or exemplary embodiments of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200510036281.7 | Jul 2005 | CN | national |