Mechanical-to-acoustical transducers may have one actuator that may be coupled to a speaker membrane or diaphragm that may then be anchored and spaced from the actuator. Such a system may provide a diaphragm-type speaker where a display may be viewed through the speaker. The actuators may be electromechanical, such as electromagnetic, piezoelectric or electrostatic. Piezo actuators do not create a magnetic field that may then interfere with a display image and may also be well suited to transform the high efficiency short linear travel of the piezo motor into a high excusion, piston-equivalent diaphragm movement.
In a first exemplary embodiment, an acoustic transducer is disclosed that is capable of converting mechanical motion into acoustical energy that may include a diaphragm and a support on one portion of the diaphragm. An actuator may then be provided that is operatively coupled to a second portion of the diaphragm. The support and actuator may be separated by a distance and are capable of relative motion to adjust such distance in response to environmental changes, such as heat and/or humidity. The diaphragm, which may be formed from polymeric type material, may have some preformed level of curvature, which nominal level of curvature may be maintained by the environmentally responsive support/actuator configuration.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention relates to a method for compensating for environmental conditions in a transducer that is capable of converting mechanical motion into acoustical energy. The method includes supplying a transducer including a diaphragm and a support on one portion of the diaphragm including an actuator operatively coupled to a second portion of the diaphragm wherein the support and actuator are separated by a distance. The diaphragm and transducer may then be exposed to changes in environmental conditions such as temperature, in which case the diaphragm may undergo some level of expansion and/or contraction. In such case the actuator and support may self-adjust the distance between the actuator and support, in which case audio output of the diaphragm may not be substantially compromised.
A mechanical-to-acoustical transducer, coupled to a diaphragm, for the purpose of producing audio sound, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,356, whose teachings are incorporated herein by reference. In one configuration, the transducer amounts to a piezo motor coupled to a diaphragm so that the excursion of the actuator is translated into a corresponding, mechanically amplified excursions of the diaphragm. The diaphragm may be curved and when optically clear, can be mounted on a frame over a visual display to provide an audio speaker. The diaphragm may therefore be characterized by a relatively large, pistonic-equivalent excursion. A typical amplification or mechanical leveraging of the excursion may be five to fifteen fold.
As illustrated in
Such effect may be particularly pronounced for a polymeric type material, when heated and/or cooled as such materials may have relatively large coefficients of thermal expansion. That is, compared to other materials, polymeric type materials have relatively high coefficients of linear thermal expansion (CLTE), which may vary from polymer to polymer. The CLTE may be expressed in units of “cm/cm ° C.” or “in/in ° F.” and in the case of polymeric materials, may fall in the range of 30-170×10−6 cm/cm ° C. For example, polycarbonate has a CLTE of about 65×10−6 cm/cm ° C. By contrast, steel has a CLTE of about 10×10−6 cm/cm ° C., copper having a value of about 16×10−6 cm/cm ° C., brass or bronze having a value of about 18×10−6 cm/cm ° C. and aluminum having a value of about 22×10−6 cm/cm ° C. Accordingly, by way of example, for a 13.0 cm in length polymeric membrane, having a CLTE of 65×10−6 cm/cm ° C., a change in temperature of about 5° C. would lead to a 4.22×10−3 cm increase in length. Depending on the initial curvature of the film diaphragm when supported in a frame, this may then lead to a sagging or tightening of about 4.2×10−2 cm.
In a first exemplary embodiment, and as shown in planar view in
Actuators such as a piezo assembly are shown generally at 22. The frame may be formed from metal or other type of material that may therefore provide relatively high stiffness and little or no lost motion in the “X” direction when the actuator forces are applied. The frame may be configured such that it provides environmental compensation. That is, the frame may be configured such that that it may undergo environmental expansion/contraction such as thermal expansion, similar to the amount of thermal expansion/contraction experienced by the diaphragm.
For example, the frame may be designed to undergo the same relative amount of thermal expansion or contraction as any sort of given supporting surface, wherein the supporting surface may be a material that is similar to that of the diaphragm. It is therefore contemplated herein that the frame may accommodate and may then balance any relative differences in dimensional changes that may take place as between the polymeric membrane and a supporting surface, which relative differences in dimensional changes may take place due to environmental factors such as heat, humidity, etc. In addition, the frame may respond to heat that may be generated by operation of the subject speaker as well as surrounding electronic components (e.g. heat emitting amplifiers, etc.).
In such fashion it may be appreciated that the any intended geometry (e.g. some degree of curvature) or nominal or starting distance assumed by the audio generating and moveable diaphragm, as shown generally by line 26 in
Another exemplary structure and method for compensating for relative movement as between the membrane and an attached supporting surface may be achieved should one mount the piezo assembly 22 to a frame structure that has all or a portion thereof formed from material having similar CLTE properties as the polymeric material utilized for the diaphragm. For example, for a given frame, the frame may include polymeric type material, similar to that of the membrane, that extends in the same direction as the membrane (i.e., upper and lower horizontal sections that extend between the vertical sections, wherein the vertical sections support the piezo assembly, as shown in
CLTEDiaphragm=(0.25-1.5) CLTEFrame Portion
It may therefore be appreciated that in this exemplary embodiment, the piezo assembly itself may be mounted to plastic (polymeric) frame structure which polymer material may be similar or the same at the polymeric material employed for the diaphragm (e.g. a polycarbonate diaphragm with polycarbonate utilized for all or a portion of the frame). In addition, it may be appreciated that by attaching, e.g., the polycarbonate horizontal components of the frame only along a portion of its length to a supporting surface, such polycarbonate components may generally respond to temperature in a manner similar to the polycarbonate diaphragm, thereby reducing those distortion in the diaphragm due to fluctuating ambient thermal conditions. In such configuration, the frame may include vertical sections, supporting the actuators, that may be formed from metallic material that may then not be connected to a supporting surface. In addition, that portion of the frame supporting the actuators may be selectively connected to a supporting surface that has a CLTE that is 25-150% of the CLTE of the diaphragm.
Still a further example of providing some level of thermal compensation leads to the use of an environmental compensation bar component which may be installed within the frame periphery.
The diaphragm is again illustrated as attached or anchored at region 20. The compensation component may be composed of a polymeric material that has a CLTE that may again be 25-150% of the value of the CLTE of the membrane 12. The piezo is shown again at 22 and the piezo attachment area is shown generally at 36. As may now be appreciated, the frame, and hence the piezo may be designed such that they are capable of pivoting at region 38, depending upon the forces ultimately acting on the piezo through the frame by the compensation bar component 34. The compensation bar is therefore itself capable of mechanically engaging with a portion of the frame which ultimately may engage the piezo in order to communicate all or a portion of any corresponding dimensional changes it may experience, and the diaphragm is specifically illustrated as attached to the piezo at diaphragm attachment location 40.
Accordingly, when the diaphragm 12 may expand or contract due to temperature variations, the compensation bar component may similarly expand or contract and the entire piezo clamp area around pivot location 38 in turn may accommodate the various dimensional changes occurring in the diaphragm due to temperature. Moreover, it may be appreciated that if the compensation bar 34 has substantially the same relative CLTE as the diaphragm, the attachment point of the compensation bar 34 may be at or near the full height of the piezo 22 (i.e. in
Attention is next directed to
In addition, as alluded to above, it can be observed in
The present invention also provides compensation for changes in dimensions of the diaphragm due to environmental conditions, by providing for changes in the piezo design itself. For example, with attention to
In addition, the invention herein contemplates what may be described as active compensation. For example, the piezo actuator may be designed to oscillate around a DC offset in order to restore the diaphragm to a nominal position and compensation for any thermal expansion and/or contraction. In such a configuration, temperature may be sensed at or near the diaphragm and the active compensation may then be initiated through a look-up-table (LUT) that may be stored in memory on an attached microprocessor. Such LUT may include information regarding the diaphragm, its dimensions, and CLTE response at any given temperature. Accordingly, the piezo may again similarly be made to undergo the exemplary configuration changes illustrated in
The foregoing description is provided to illustrate and explain the present invention. However, the description hereinabove should not be considered to limit the scope of the invention set forth in the claims appended here to.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applications Ser. Nos. 60/685,841 and 60/685,842, both filed May 31, 2005, which are incorporated herein by reference. Reference is also made to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/421,345 entitled “Optimized Piezo Design For A Mechanical-To-Acoustical Transducer”, filed simultaneously herewith, whose teachings are also incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3509387 | Thorn et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3544201 | Schlafer et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
4056742 | Tibbetts | Nov 1977 | A |
4088915 | Kodama | May 1978 | A |
4170742 | Itagaki et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4352961 | Kumada et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4454386 | Koyano | Jun 1984 | A |
4578613 | Posthuma de Boer et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4593160 | Nakamura | Jun 1986 | A |
4607145 | Ravinet et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4625138 | Ballato | Nov 1986 | A |
4638207 | Radice | Jan 1987 | A |
4680800 | Bank et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4807294 | Iwata et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4864624 | Tichy | Sep 1989 | A |
4969197 | Takaya | Nov 1990 | A |
4979219 | Lin | Dec 1990 | A |
5031222 | Takaya | Jul 1991 | A |
5115472 | Park et al. | May 1992 | A |
5193119 | Tontini et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5283835 | Athanas | Feb 1994 | A |
5388160 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5428832 | Nohara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5473214 | Hildebrand | Dec 1995 | A |
5524058 | Moseley | Jun 1996 | A |
5526421 | Berger et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5608282 | Wilber et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615270 | Miller et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5638454 | Jones et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638456 | Conley et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642332 | Chang et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652801 | Paddock | Jul 1997 | A |
5676612 | Schellekens et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684884 | Nakaya et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5705878 | Lewis et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711058 | Frey | Jan 1998 | A |
5736808 | Szilagyi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751827 | Takahashi | May 1998 | A |
5767612 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780958 | Strugach et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802195 | Regan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825902 | Fujishima | Oct 1998 | A |
5828768 | Eatwell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5856956 | Toki | Jan 1999 | A |
5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
5901231 | Parrella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5973441 | Lo et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977688 | Utsunomiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003766 | Azima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023123 | Petiet | Feb 2000 | A |
6028389 | Bernstein | Feb 2000 | A |
6031926 | Azima et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058196 | Heron | May 2000 | A |
6060811 | Fox et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064746 | Nakamura | May 2000 | A |
6144746 | Azima et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151402 | Azima et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181797 | Parrella et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188775 | Azima et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195440 | Warnaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198831 | Azima et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215881 | Azima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215882 | Heron | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215884 | Parrella et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218766 | Warnaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243473 | Azima et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247551 | Heron | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278790 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6437485 | Johansson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472797 | Kishimoto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504286 | Porat et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522760 | Azima et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6570299 | Takeshima et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6720708 | Athanas | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720709 | Porat et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6844657 | Miller et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7038356 | Athanas | May 2006 | B2 |
20060290236 | Ikehashi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090200896 | Morris et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 649 575 | Jan 1991 | FR |
1 369 241 | Oct 1974 | GB |
04 140999 | May 1992 | JP |
WO 9828942 | Jul 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060269087 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60685841 | May 2005 | US | |
60685842 | May 2005 | US |