The present invention relates to packaging and in particular blister packaging of the type used to retain product in a receptacle hollow. The present invention further relates to the formation of a blister package.
Blister packages are commonly used to retain consumable products, such as candy, gum, powders, tablets and the like. This type of packaging is convenient for separately securing individual product portions or doses. Each individual portion may be dispensed from the package while leaving additional portions sealed within the package. Such blister packages may also be used for non-consumable products, such as toys, hardware, etc.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,079,475 to McArthur et al. shows a blister package wherein the covering layer is formed of a polymer material and is provided with a plurality of score lines formed within the covering layer. The lines form a repeating pattern substantially across the area of the blister package. This patent is herein incorporated by reference.
US 2005/0284789 to Carespodi shows a blister package including a backing laminate having a polymer layer, a foil layer and adhesive layers. The laminate is laser scored to assist in the push through dispensing of product from the blister receptacle.
WO 2005-056419 to Bobbett discusses release zones, which form an outline of the product, and patterns having rows of straight dashed lines extending across the surface of the blister package. In one embodiment the dashed lines intersect, creating a “+” shaped formation.
Japanese patent publications JP 05161692 and JP 07149367 appear to describe blister packages with laser slits on a sealing layer made from a plastic film. The covering film of the sealing layer includes multiple slits, centrally positioned over a receptacle hollow.
A blister package is formed for retaining individual products. The package includes a receptacle substrate having a sealing flange and at least one receiving cell or receptacle hollow formed to retain product therein. A polymer top layer covers the cell and a portion thereof is sealed to the sealing flange. A score pattern is formed in at least one surface of the top layer and overlaps the cell. The score pattern is formed for promoting propagation of a tear in the top layer upon application of a transverse force of the product within the cell against the portion of the top layer overlapping the cell. The score pattern is defined by a first plurality of score lines formed in a repeating pattern and a second plurality of spaced score lines formed in a repeating pattern. The first and second pluralities of score lines intersect one another.
In a further aspect of the disclosure, the total linear length of the score lines per cell is at least 5 inches, with a preferred length exceeding 6 inches.
In a still further aspect of the disclosure, the ratio of the linear length of score lines to the cell area is at least 10.6, with a preferred ratio exceeding 12.8.
A further aspect of the disclosure defines a total number of score line intersections per cell of at least 10, with a preferred number being at least 12 intersections.
Variations in the form of the score line patterns are contemplated within these defined parameters.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings a number of forms which are presently preferred; it being understood that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
Referring now to the drawings, where like numerals identify like elements, there is shown in
In
The score pattern 22 in
In
As shown, the relatively outer part 34 of the top layer 14 is the structural portion of the layer and is formed of a polymer material. The second or inner part 36 of the top layer 14 forms the sealing surface for attachment of the top layer 14 to the sealing flange 18. Preferably, a seal coating 36 is applied to the inside surface of the outer part 34. The seal coating 36 is provided to facilitate heat sealing of the top layer 14 to the flange 18. Alternatively, the inner part 36 of the top layer may be a separate polymer layer and may be formed as part of a laminate structure, with the inner part being compatible with the material of the sealing flange. A laminate structure may also be provided as the structural part of the top layer and a separate heat seal coating may be applied on the inner surface of the laminate. As a further alternative, the top layer may be secured to the flange by a patterned adhesive or similar attachment mechanism. A print layer (not shown) may be provided within the structure and other layers may be included or added. It is preferred that the top layer not include a paper, foil or metal layer.
Schematically shown in
Separation of the cuts for the various score line patterns within the overall pattern is contemplated to simplify the manufacturing process and the formation of the die-cutting rollers. Although two separate patterns are shown in the schematic process of
Once the score pattern is completed within the surface of the film, the web is moved to be joined with the sealing flange. The receptacle substrate 12 is shown in rolled from 48. The cells 16 may be formed as part of the overall process or prior to the formation of the roll 48. The cells 16 in the substrate 12 are filled with product 20 at a filling station F and the open end of each hollow is brought into alignment with the top layer 14 at the heating station H (or similar station for securing the top layer to the substrate). The top layer 14 is sealed to the sealing flange (18) to close each cell 16 (and seal the product 20 therein). The combined web and substrate is cut and separated to define a package having the desired size and number of product filled cells.
The schematic of
It has been found that one desired quality of a blister package of the type shown (with a polymer top layer and a defined score pattern therein) relates to the force required for discharging product from a cell. A consistent push-through force is preferable within each blister package and similarly within a plurality of similarly formed blister packages. Hence, it is preferable that there be a minimum of deviation in discharging product from each cell.
In one example, the blister package may be utilized for gum or other confection products. One desirable feature within this type blister package is a relatively low push-through force. It should be relatively easy to discharge the product from the cell. However, the required push-through force should be sufficient for the package to maintain its integrity during assembly, shipping and handling. Hence, the occurrence of accidental tearing of the top layer is preferably minimized.
It is preferred that the score line pattern form in the top layer of the blister package have a consistent depth of cut across the cell and across multiple cells. In addition, in the assembly of the package, the position of the score pattern is preferably formed in registration with the cell opening for consistency of the linear length of the score lines and the number and position of the score line intersections. Additional factors that may affect the consistency of the required push-through force may include—but not be limited to—the strength of the polymer top layer, the thickness of the layer, the tension in the web during the scoring operation or sealing operation, and the heat generated during scoring and sealing.
The parameters of a consistent push-through force are defined by empirical testing of various score line patterns. Generally, it is desirable to have a relatively large number of linear inches of score lines in the overall pattern covering the open portion of the cell. In addition, a relatively large number of intersections within the score line formation generally provides consistent push-through results.
In evaluating various score patterns for a blister package covering layer, a testing device may be utilized having a probe that moves against a secured film or web to simulate the push-through force for discharging a product from a blister receptacle. The test film/web is retained by a fixture that simulates a grid of receptacles within a blister package. The fixture secures the film/web in a manner similar to the securing of the film/web to a sealing flange of the blister package. The fixture divides the film/web into separate cells having dimensions corresponding to the cell of a blister receptacle. The probe is connected to equipment that measures the force applied by the probe when placed in contact with the film/web portion. The probe moves at a constant rate in a single transverse direction, applying a force to the web/film, until the film/web material within the test cell “fails”. Failure of the film/web results when the probe punctures or breaks through the material, simulating the push-through discharge of the product (such as a gum pellet or similar object). The probe is moved in a pattern across the grid of simulated cell cover portions, measuring the push-through force at a plurality of cells. The data from the plurality of cells is then analyzed for average push-through force and for consistency of the results.
The push-through test results for various score patterns within a polymer film material may be compared to a standard or “control” force. For example, the results obtained from a testing device for a scored polymer film may be compared to the test results for a typical aluminum foil material, such as a foil for covering a gum package. This material is normally 0.0011 inches thick. It has been found that such a typical foil web requires a range of 4 to 8 lbs for push-through of the product from with the receptacle hollow.
In
In the graph of
The Current pattern and Option A both result in an average push-through force in the range of the foil control or target range of 4-8 lbs. However, the deviation in the push-through force is recognizably higher in considering the test data in the Current pattern verses the Option A pattern. This higher deviation in the current pattern typically means that the force required in any given cell opening may exceed the target range. It is concluded from the data that an increase in the linear inches of the score pattern, in addition to an increase in the number of line intersections, provides advantageous, more consistent results.
The Option B pattern includes a two-opposing pattern of chevron shaped lines. The chevrons appear to form apex points. Each chevron is relatively closely spaced with adjacent chevron lines. The total linear length of score lines is increased to 6.24 inches, corresponding to a score line to cell area ratio of about 13.3. In addition, as represented by the graph in
The pattern labeled Option C shows a series of crossed straight lines combined with a pattern having rows of circles. As shown, the straight line pattern creates a crossed “X” with intersections within the straight line patterns. The X formation intersects with four circles formed in two rows over the cell openings. The X lines may be formed by a single die-cutting roller or the portions of the X may be separated on two rollers, with a third roller providing the circle pattern. Another method of formation may include one die-cutting roller having a first pattern with one half of the X pattern and a set of two circles adjacent thereto. The second roller would create the same pattern in mirror image, with the two rollers combining to create the total pattern illustrated. In the graph in
The pattern example labeled Option D includes a straight line pattern overlapping rows of aligned curves. The curves are spaced relatively closer than those shown in the Current example and the Option A example. Three straight or lineal lines are included in the pattern, two intersecting the curves and one straight line formed between the curves. In
The Option E example includes a plurality of circles, in varying sizes, and a series of angled straight lines. The circles are aligned in rows with a straight line preferably aligned and intersecting the circles. As shown, each straight line is transverse to and intersects with two side edges of each circle. In
Option F provides a series of concentric circles with angled, parallel straight lines.
Option G includes a series of parallel straight lines combined with a series of zig-zag lines. The zig-zag lines create a diamond shape that is traversed by intersecting straight lines. This Option G is an example of a score line pattern that may provide relatively consistent results for push-through force despite a shifting of the two line pattern positions or a shifting of the overall pattern relative to the cell position.
In Option H, there is shown an overlap pattern of offset circles. The position of the circle rows creates an edge overlap in 4 places, with 8 intersections. In
A useful blister package may be formed with a polymer top layer secured to the blister tray sealing flange having a score pattern formed in at least one surface and overlapping the cell. The score pattern is provided for promoting propagation of a tear in the top layer upon application of a transverse force of the product within the blister cell against the portion of the top layer overlapping the cell. In the above examples, a monolayer of polyester (0.0012 inches thick) was utilized. The score lines were targeted to cut into the film at 70% of the film thickness. This target cut depth was normally accepted in a range of plus or minus 10%. This structure and the identified score line patterns were then compared to the target foil push-through force. The various score patterns discussed herein may have multiple applications, including such examples as pharmaceuticals, soap tablets, etc. A relatively large push through force may be desirable in some applications. Variations in the top layer material, the thickness of the top layer, and the depth of cut may be incorporated into the various applications.
In comparing the various score line embodiments shown, the patterns identified as Options A, Option D, Option F and Option G were found to provide consistent results as compared to the target range for push-through. Based the empirical data and observation, these score pattern will create positive push-through force results. These score line patterns include a total of at least 5 inches of linear score lines per cell or a score line to cell area ratio of at least 10.6. Moreover, the results were found to further improve when the score line linear length exceeded 6 inches or a score line to cell area ratio exceed 12.8. Further, these preferred score line lengths and ratio numbers are coupled with a number of line intersections in the pattern. The preferred number of score line intersections is at least 10, and preferably exceeding 12.
As for Options B, C and E, the results were affected by registration of the two score line patterns during formation of the overall pattern on the polymer web and further by the form of the score lines. For example, the relatively sharp apex of the chevrons of Option B has a tendency to form an inconsistent cut in the polymer web. A variation of this pattern, with a rounded apex is contemplated to resolve this separate issue, while meeting the preferred linear length and intersection parameters defined. Options C and E were found to be affected by registration issues between the X and crossing line patterns with the circles. Positional variations affected the depth of cut in addition to varying the number of intersections and overall linear length of score lines within the cells tested. Elimination of the registration complications is contemplated to remove inconsistencies within the push-through measurement. With respect to Option H, the low number of intersections resulted in relatively inconsistent push-through results. (Registration issues also affected the testing results, independent of the intersection limitation issue.)
The line pattern options shown and described illustrate that variations in the form of the line patterns and the density of the lines each affect the total linear length of the score lines in the cells and a total number of intersections. These two parameters are not necessarily proportional; hence, the same result may not occur if there is an increase in one number with a corresponding reduction in the other. Further, line patterns different from those shows may produce desirable results. As noted above, selection of a pattern that is relatively simple may affect the overall acceptability of the pattern, due to the preferred method of applying different portions of the overall score line pattern at different stations in the formation process. As noted, registration of the score line portions during the die-cutting operation (as an example) may affect performance results. A further factor in the selection of a score line pattern is the depth of cut. A consistent depth is desirable, although variations may be acceptable, depending on user requirements and the line pattern selected.
In the drawings and specification, there has been set forth a number of embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, these terms are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation. The scope of the invention is set forth one or more of the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of pending application Ser. No. 13/176,933, filed Jul. 6, 2011, and published as US 2013/0008825 on Jan. 10, 2013, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/675,588, filed Jul. 25, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2680558 | Mai | Jun 1954 | A |
2967010 | Cuffey, Jr. et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
3004697 | Stone | Oct 1961 | A |
3421615 | Salzer et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3759371 | Marks | Sep 1973 | A |
3863834 | Sandford | Feb 1975 | A |
3872970 | Edison | Mar 1975 | A |
3942640 | Hellstrom | Mar 1976 | A |
3948394 | Hellstrom | Apr 1976 | A |
3986640 | Redmond | Oct 1976 | A |
4243144 | Margulies | Jan 1981 | A |
4317399 | Romagnoli | Mar 1982 | A |
4342395 | Brown | Aug 1982 | A |
4537312 | Intini | Aug 1985 | A |
4911304 | Bunin | Mar 1990 | A |
5014851 | Wick | May 1991 | A |
5150793 | Tannenbaum | Sep 1992 | A |
5172812 | Wharton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5310060 | Bitner et al. | May 1994 | A |
5339960 | Price | Aug 1994 | A |
5360116 | Schmiletzky | Nov 1994 | A |
5469968 | Matthews et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5529188 | Coggswell | Jun 1996 | A |
5685431 | Chambers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5791478 | Kalvelage et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5944191 | Ray et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6006913 | Ludemann et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6212858 | Breitler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6422391 | Swartz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6516949 | Fuller et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6637431 | Ekelius et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6659280 | Paliotta et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7093716 | Intini | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7188728 | Williams-Hartman | Mar 2007 | B2 |
8079475 | McArthur et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020162768 | Bolnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030102247 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040175527 | Shiota et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050016134 | Prebelli et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050284789 | Carespodi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070227932 | Bobbett et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080073240 | Bowers et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080230432 | Bobbett et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090145800 | Bowers et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100072104 | Kohl | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100243508 | Sekiguchi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120061282 | McArthur et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130008825 | McArthur et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4402038 | Jul 1995 | DE |
1828009 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2757835 | Jul 1998 | FR |
2343440 | May 2000 | GB |
2414982 | Aug 2007 | GB |
05161692 | Jun 1993 | JP |
07149367 | Jun 1995 | JP |
10323955 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2005056419 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006012314 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007113850 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2009143234 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010077797 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Declaration of Benjamin Davis, submitted in U.S. Appl. No. 12/011,116 (signed Jul. 20, 2011). |
Declaration of Jacobs Branyon, submitted in U.S. Appl. No. 13/176,933 (signed Jun. 20, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130306511 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61675588 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13176933 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13950596 | US |