The invention relates to high voltage vacuum insulators, such as those in charged particle beam accelerators, and specifically, to a dielectric high gradient index insulator with improved vacuum and voltage standoff performance and with improved manufacturability.
The electrical strength of vacuum insulators places a lower limit on the size of particle accelerators and pulsed voltage systems. Generally, the higher the voltage standoff of an insulating material, the higher is the electrical field strength it can sustain without voltage breakdown, and the smaller is the thickness of insulator needed to separate a pair of electrodes with a given high voltage difference.
When subjected to strong electric fields, vacuum insulators generally fail by surface flashover or by metal evaporation and deposition on insulator surfaces. Surface flashover occurs when a charged particle, such as an ion or an electron, impacts the wall of a vacuum insulator and initiates a secondary electron avalanche. A high gradient insulator (HGI) consisting of alternating metallic and dielectric layers, has been found to withstand much higher voltage differences than a monolithic dielectric material of the same thickness, presumably because the metal layers absorb secondary electrons thereby preventing them from forming electron avalanches.
A key failure mechanism of HGI's is metal evaporation and deposition on insulator surfaces, which occurs when a vacuum arc is formed between consecutive metal layers. Successive depositions of metal degrade the voltage standoff of the insulator and, by creating a short-circuit path, may lead to catastrophic voltage breakdown.
In the manufacture of an HGI, great care is needed to form the junctions between the metal and dielectric layers. To avoid arcing, the metal layers must not protrude into the vacuum even slightly beyond the edges of the dielectric layers. Furthermore, the brazed junctions between metal and dielectric must have no irregularities that might amplify the strengths of local electric fields causing voltage breakdown.
Brazing of alternating layers of metal and ceramic presents additional technological challenges and difficulties. First, each metal-ceramic interface must be leak tested for vacuum compatibility. Second, brazing requires sublayers of brazing filler and metallization, which makes it impossible to implement designs having very thin layers. Third, the mechanical strength and vacuum integrity of the brazed structure is inferior to that of a monolithic insulator.
Lithographic processes for depositing metal on a ceramic surface, as an alternative to brazing, also have several drawbacks. Deposition on the inner surface of small cylinders is limited by illumination angle considerations. Furthermore, additional etching processes are needed to prevent metal layers from protruding outward from the ceramic, and giving rise to vacuum arc breakdown.
For all of the reasons given above, it would be desirable to have an HGI structure which has no metal layers, does not require brazing, and is entirely made of dielectric materials. The present invention provides just such a structure.
The present invention is a dielectric high gradient insulator device, or DHGI, and method of manufacture.
The device includes a stack of at least two dielectric layers having different dielectric constants. The layers are aligned along a longitudinal axis and are configured to form a shaped electric field in a region proximal to a surface of the layers when the DHGI is placed between electrodes having a voltage difference. The shaped electric field deflects negatively charged particles, such as negative ions and secondary electrons, away from the surface, thereby inhibiting avalanche formation and voltage breakdown of the insulator.
According to one feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, the device includes more than two dielectric layers having different values of dielectric constant which are arranged in an alternating structure.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, at least one of the dielectric layers has a gradual variation in dielectric constant.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, the device includes more than two dielectric layers having different values of dielectric constant which are arranged in an alternating structure and at least one dielectric layer having a gradual variation in dielectric constant.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, the different values of dielectric constant have a maximum value and a minimum value whose ratio is at least an order of magnitude.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, a surface of the dielectric layers includes a material having a secondary electron emission yield less than unity.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, at least one dielectric layer includes a low dielectric material selected from a group consisting of alumina (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), silicon dioxide (SiO2), silicon nitride (Si3N4), titanium dioxide (TiO2), polyamide, polystyrene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and plexiglass (Polymethyl methacrylate).
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, at least one dielectric layer includes a high dielectric material selected from a group consisting of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, LaTiO3, SrTiO3, doped NiO, CaCu3Ti4O12, doped TiO2 or αFeO0.5β0.5O3, where α represents the elements Ba, Sr, or Ca and β represents the elements Nb, Ta, or Sb.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, at least one dielectric layer includes metallic particles.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the device, the device is a component of a charged particle accelerator, a charged plasma source, an X-ray generating machine, or a pulsed power system.
The method for manufacturing a dielectric high gradient insulator device includes the steps of:
According to one feature of certain preferred implementations of the method, the densification process includes a sintering process.
According to a further feature of certain preferred implementations of the method, the method includes an additional step g) of treating one or more surfaces of the dielectric layers with a material having a secondary electron emission yield less than unity.
The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention is a dielectric high gradient insulator and method of manufacture. The principles of the invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description.
The material composition of the dielectric layers is an insulating plastic, such as polyimide and polystyrene, or an insulating ceramic, such as alumina (aluminum oxide, Al2O3). Metal layers 30 divide the voltage difference between the two electrodes, with a roughly linear dependence on the axial coordinate Z. The voltage standoff of HGI 10 is up to four times higher than that of a uniform insulator, having the same overall length and diameter. Alternatively, HGI 10 can be made much smaller than a uniform alumina insulator, and still provide the same voltage standoff.
The dielectric constant, or relative permittivity, ε, of a material increases with the ability to modify a charge distribution inside the material by applying an external electric field. In the electrostatic regime, the charge distribution inside a dielectric material subject to an externally applied electric field, D, induces an internal electric field, Eint, equal to D(1/ε−1). The total field inside the dielectric is then (D+Eint), which is equal to D/ε. As ε goes to infinity, Eint approaches (−D), and the total field inside the dielectric diminishes to zero, which is the case of a perfect conductor, e.g. a metal with zero resistivity. Thus, for large values of ε2, the charge distribution on the surface of dielectric layer 130 is similar to that of a metal layer having the same dimensions.
By way of illustration, electrode 115 it taken to be a cathode at ground potential, and electrode 125 to be an anode at a high positive potential, for example, 50 kilovolts. Emission areas 135 designate areas on the surface of electrode 115 which are near to a “triple point” where the surface of electrode 115 meets the surface of layer 130 and vacuum 165. Emission areas 135 are prone to secondary electron (SE) emission because of the presence of high extraction electric fields in these areas. As a result, SE's are emitted from electrode 115, typically with kinetic energies higher than 10 electron volts, and with initial velocity vectors pointing in random directions. After emission, the SE's are accelerated by electric fields existing in vacuum cavity 165. Once they are accelerated to energies of, say, 0.5 kilovolt or more, there is the possibility that they will generate additional SE's by colliding with the surface of one of the dielectric layers, thereby causing an electron avalanche and voltage breakdown by surface flashover.
Shaped electric field regions 145, which are inside the vacuum cavity and in close proximity to the interface between layers 130 and 140, are designed to prevent surface flashover. When ε2 is much greater than ε1, the electric field in regions 145 has a large component which is perpendicular to the Z-axis, and in a direction which deflects SE's away from the surface of layer 140. Trajectory 160 illustrates one such path of an SE emitted at the surface of electrode 115 inside area 135 in a direction which would impact layer 140, were it to travel in a straight line. As the SE approaches region 145, a shaped electric field deflects trajectory 160 towards the Z-axis. As a result, the SE is absorbed on anode electrode 125 at a point which is located at an electron intercept distance ΔR, away from the vacuum surface of layer 140.
The value of ΔR is proportional to the strength of the electric field component perpendicular to the Z-axis, in shaped electric field region 145. The latter depends on the relative magnitudes of the dielectric constants ε2 and ε1, corresponding to dielectric layers 130 and 140, respectively.
By combining the features of
Dielectric Materials
High and variable dielectric material layers may preferably be made by casting and/or printing a mixture composed of a low dielectric matrix and high dielectric or metallic filler particles followed by a densification (sintering in ceramic materials) stage. The proportion of matrix to filler material is selected to achieve a desired dielectric constant value or profile.
The mixture can be in the form of a powder or a slurry. The material of the low dielectric matrix may be, for example: alumina (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), silicon dioxide (SiO2), silicon nitride (Si3N4), titanium dioxide (TiO2), polyamide, polystyrene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and plexiglass (PMMA, or Polymethyl methacrylate).
The material of the high dielectric filler particles may be, for example: BaTiO3, PbTiO3, LaTiO3, SrTiO3, doped NiO, CaCu3Ti4O12, doped TiO2 or αFe0.5β0.5O3, where α represents the elements Ba, Sr, or Ca and β represents the elements Nb, Ta, or Sb.
DHGI Method of Manufacture
A co-sintered structure may have the advantage of providing superior vacuum tightness and mechanical stability, with fewer processing steps. In the case of ceramic dielectric layers, the densification process in step 610F typically includes a sintering process. After step 610F, the stack is cooled gradually to minimize thermally induced mechanical stresses.
An optional additional step 610G may be desirable which consists of treating one or more surfaces of the dielectric layers that are subject to incident SE bombardment with an insulating material having a low SE emission yield; that is, a material whose SE emission yield is less than unity over a wide range of incident SE energies. Examples of such materials are metal oxides or nitrides, where the metal may be, for example, titanium, chromium, or vanadium. The treatment is preferably done by chemical or physical vapor deposition (CVD or PVD) or by doping the matrix material.
It will be appreciated that the above descriptions are intended only to serve as examples, and that many other embodiments are possible within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2020/058949 | 9/24/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/059193 | 4/1/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5660878 | Le Gressus | Aug 1997 | A |
20180215129 | Tada | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20200027673 | Benkert | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102017201326 | Aug 2018 | DE |
2806432 | Nov 2014 | EP |
9833228 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9927419 | Jun 1999 | WO |
2010019616 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2018232495 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hargrave's Communications Dictionary, Wiley, definition of “order of magnitude.” (Year: 2001). |
Israel Office Action, Application No. 269739, Dec. 19, 2022. |
Leopold J G et al: “Different approach to pulsed high-voltage vacuum-insulation design” Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams American Physical Society USA, vol. 10, No. 6, Jun. 5, 2007 (Jun. 5, 2007), pp. 060401-1-060401-14, XP002565024. |
Sampayan S et al: “High gradient insulator technology for the dielectric wall accelerator” Proceedings Particle Accelerator Conference May 1-5, 1995 Dallas, TX, USA, vol. 2, May 1, 1996 (May 1, 1996), pp. 1269-1271, XP002565025. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220293295 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |