The invention relates to antennas and, more particularly, to a dielectric-resonator array antenna system that is small and low in profile, while also having a wide bandwidth, accurate beam steering and efficient radiation.
Aeronautical antenna systems for satellite communications can be very large in area, which results in increased air drag and more weight for the aircraft on which the antenna system is mounted. Increased drag and weight result in a reduction in the aircraft's flying range, increased fuel consumption and corresponding higher aircraft operational costs. Large antenna systems can also increase lightning and bird strike risks, as well as degrade the visual aesthetics of the aircraft.
Communications with satellites using physically small antenna arrays requires an exceptionally low noise temperature and high aperture efficiency. In aeronautical applications, the antenna should also be narrow and have a low profile in order to minimize drag and not deviate excessively from the contours of the aircraft. Conventional antenna systems for aeronautical satellite communications (SATCOM) applications, in the lower microwave frequency bands, typically utilize either drooping-crossed-dipole elements or microstrip patch radiators. The configuration of crossed-dipole elements is relatively tall, which results in high drag.
The microstrip patch element has a relatively low profile, but has both a narrow beamwidth and narrow bandwidth, which restrict the antenna's performance. The narrow beamwidth of the patch element results in excessive gain reduction and impedance mismatch when the array beam peak is scanned toward the aircraft horizon with the antenna mounted on the top of the fuselage. The narrow bandwidth of the patch radiator makes the impedance mismatch more catastrophic at extreme scan angles. These effects reduce the gain of the antenna system, thus requiring that the antenna have a larger antenna footprint and overall larger size.
In addition, conventional antenna arrays have beam steering systems for creating beam radiation patterns that use simple look-up tables for determining element phase settings for a given beam position relative to the airframe. This current approach to determining element phase settings does not minimize interference with other satellites on the geosynchronous arc. Consequently, the size of the antenna must be relatively large in order to achieve a desired degree of isolation against satellites other than the one with which communication is desired.
Some existing high gain phased array antenna systems for aeronautical Inmarsat applications include the CMA-2102 antenna system by CMC Electronics, the T4000 antenna system by Tecom, the HGA 7000 antenna system by Omnipless, and the Airlink and Dassault Electronique Conformal antenna system by Ball Aerospace. The CMA-2102 and Tecom T4000 antenna systems are conventional drooping crossed dipole arrays of large size that use conventional steering algorithms and conventional mounting techniques. The Omnipless HGA 7000 antenna system has not yet been sold commercially and is of unknown construction. The Ball Aerospace Airlink and Dassault Electronique conformal antenna systems are conventional microstrip patch arrays that use conventional steering algorithms and conventional mounting techniques.
A need exists for a small antenna system that can be mounted on a small surface area, and which has high gain in directions of intended communication and low interference in other directions. A need also exists for a small, compact antenna system that has high beam-steering accuracy, wide bandwidth and very efficient radiation.
The invention provides a dielectric resonator element array (DRA) antenna system that is small, compact, has high gain in the direction of intended communication, minimized interference in unintended directions of communication and a wide bandwidth. The antenna system comprises a ground plane, a feed structure, a beam shaping and steering controller, a mounting apparatus, an array of dielectric resonator elements and a radome that is close to or in contact with the array. The mounting apparatus preferably is configured so as not to appreciably increase the size of the system when the antenna system is mounted on the object. Therefore, the radome does not appreciably increase drag and does not adversely affect the aesthetic appearance of the object on which it is mounted.
The radome preferably is closer than ¼λ to the array elements. Because of this, effects of the radome on the radiation patterns generated by the antenna system preferably are taken into account by the beam shaping and steering algorithm executed by the beam steering controller. The controller receives information relating to one or more of object latitude, longitude, attitude, direction of travel, intended direction of communication and unintended directions of communication. The controller processes this information in accordance with the beam shaping and steering algorithm and determines excitation phase for the array elements. The controller then outputs signals to the feed structure to cause the proper phase excitations to be set.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, drawings and claims.
The dielectric resonator element array (DRA) antenna system of the invention is well suited for use in a wide range of applications, particularly for data, voice and video satellite communications, and more particularly, for communication with Inmarsat satellites. However, the antenna system of the present invention is not limited to any particular uses or technological environments.
As indicated above, large antenna systems on aircraft can increase drag, weight, cause lightning strikes and other safety problems, and degrade the aircraft's appearance. System specifications, such as that of the Inmarsat Aeronautical System Definition Manual (SDM), place specific demands on performance that can lead to a large antenna structure. The invention provides a much smaller aeronautical antenna system while still satisfying such performance requirements. The compact nature of the DRA antenna system of the invention is achievable due to a variety of features, including:
These features of the invention allow the DRA antenna system to have a reduced height and width relative to known systems, which results in reduced aeronautical drag, the ability to install the antenna system in a very small area without excessive gap under the array element plane, and improved beam control.
The compact nature of the DRA antenna system 30 shown in
Typically, the dielectric elements 34 have a relatively high permittivity (i.e., higher than that of free space and preferably substantially higher), low conductivity and low loss tangent. The high permittivity of the dielectric elements 34 enables the size of the elements to be kept small. In an embodiment, each the dielectric elements 34 is made of a plastic base filled with a ceramic powder. The plastic material typically will be delivered in the form of a cured slab, although the material also comes in the form of a liquid or gel, which also may be used directly. The dielectric elements 34 may be attached to the upper surface of the microwave feed layer 33 by various materials (not shown), including, for example, a Cyanoacrylate adhesive, plastic resin with embedded ceramic particles, or mechanical fasteners.
The dielectric elements 34 may be arranged in a variety of configurations, including, for example, a triangular grid, a rectangular grid, and non-uniform grids. Although the elements 34 are shown arranged in a rectangular array of parallel rows of the elements 34, the transmission line structures in the feed layer 33 are capable of being varied so the electrical paths that connect the elements together are arranged in such a way that various array patterns can be achieved. In addition, although the individual elements 34 are shown in
If the DRA antenna system 30 is to radiate circular polarization or have two orthogonal polarisations in the same operating band, then the resonator could have 90° rotational symmetry in order that the impedance matching and pattern characteristics for the two orthogonal polarization components will be similar. For example, with reference to
The microwave feed layer 33 preferably incorporates phase control devices (not shown) that allow the phase lengths between the individual elements 34 and the antenna system input and/or output ports (not shown) to be independently varied. Alternatively, the path lengths are varied in a manner dependent on introductions of phase distributions consistent with the desired radiation pattern. Multiple feed structures may couple into the dielectric elements 34 in order to produce multiple beams. Active gain devices (not shown) such as amplifiers may be inserted between the dielectric elements 34 and the feed or feeds in order to maximize efficiency. Such active gain devices may be on either side of the phase control devices. Devices to control the relative signal strength (amplitude control devices) to and/or from the individual elements 34 may also be included.
The phase control devices and/or amplitude control devices of the microwave feed structure are connected to the beam steering controller 40, as shown in
The controller 40 of the present invention is capable of producing a wide variety of beam shapes for any pointing angle (i.e., the direction of the desired satellite and thus also the nominal beam peak) relative to the object on which the antenna 30 is mounted (e.g., an airframe). For example, if interference with other satellites along the geostationary arc is of concern, then the beam shape can be synthesized or optimized for minimum gain along this arc except in the direction of the desired satellite. The control signals preferably are computed by real-time pattern synthesis using parameters such as, for example, aircraft latitude, longitude, orientation, location of the satellite of interest and/or locations of satellites for which interference is to be minimized. This is in contrast to prior art techniques that rely on reading prestored values from a lookup table.
In the case where the antenna system is used in an aeronautics environment, the positions of the interfering satellites relative to the airframe are a function of the aircraft location and orientation for any given pointing direction relative to the airframe. The prior art techniques, which use prestored values from a lookup table to control beam steering, do not take the positions of interfering satellites into account in shaping and steering the beam. The real-time pattern synthesis or optimization of the present invention enable such factors to be taken into account in beam shaping and steering. Block 42 in
The beam steering controller 40 may incorporate one or more external navigation/attitude sensors as a supplement to, or as an alternative to, other means by which the antenna beam can be steered towards the desired satellite. For example, the beam steering controller 40 may use inputs from one or more accelerometers, inclinometers, Inertial Navigation System (INS), Inertial Reference System (IRS), Global Positioning System (GPS), compass, rate sensors or other devices for measuring position, acceleration, motion, attitude, etc. These may be devices that are used for other purposes on the aircraft or that are installed specifically for the purpose of assisting in the steering of the antenna beam.
The diplexer circuitry 43 provides isolation between the transmission (TX) and reception (RX) frequency bands. This may be achieved by way of, for example, filtering, microwave isolators, nulling or some combination of these or other mechanisms. The diplexer circuitry 43 may have an integral low noise amplifier (not shown) in the reception path such that the losses between the isolation device and the low noise amplifier are minimized, which, consequently, maximizes the system G/T. As stated above, the antenna system of the invention also may be operated in a half-duplex mode, may utilize a circulator, signal processing and/or some other mechanism to separate transmit and receive signals, thus making the diplexer circuitry 43 unnecessary in these alternative configurations.
The radome 35 shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
It should be noted that short metallic fasteners 73 have a much higher electromagnetic resonant frequency than longer fasteners. The resonant frequencies of the short fasteners 73 thus tend to be far above the operating frequency of the antenna system 30. Consequently, the short metal fasteners have very little impact on the radiation performance of the antenna system 30. The lower position of the fasteners 73 (e.g., below the dielectric resonator elements 34) further ensures that the fasteners 73 are not strongly excited with microwave currents that could affect the radiation patterns or impedance characteristics of the array elements 34 or overall antenna system 30.
Typically, the indentations 71 or openings 72 in the radome 35 will be filled for environmental reasons. Precipitation should be kept out of the radome 35 and indentations or openings, and drag they create, should be minimized. This can be achieved by filling the indentations 71 or openings 72 with plugs 74 and 75, respectively. The plugs 74 or 75 can snap into the indentations or openings 72 or be bonded into place to fill the indentations 71 or openings 72 to thereby minimize drag. Of course, other types of attachment mechanisms are also suitable for this purpose. A flexible adhesive such as RTV, for example, may be suitable for securing the plugs in place, as this allows later removal of the plugs and thus of the mounting hardware and of the antenna system itself.
The present invention has been described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments. The present invention is not limited to the embodiments described herein. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that modifications can be made to the embodiments described herein without deviating from the present invention. All such modifications are within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5512906 | Speciale | Apr 1996 | A |
5764185 | Fukushima et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5940036 | Oliver et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952972 | Ittipiboon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982333 | Stillinger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990838 | Bhattacharyya | Nov 1999 | A |
6111542 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6183360 | Kato et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225961 | Benjauthrit | May 2001 | B1 |
6281845 | Ittipiboon et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6339707 | Wainfan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6404401 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6452565 | Kingsley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6501439 | Keilen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6570467 | Walker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6628242 | Hacker et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646605 | McKinzie, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653985 | Sikina et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6768454 | Kingsley et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6816118 | Kingsley et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20020014996 | Keilen | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020070820 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087992 | Bengeult et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105461 | Fukushima et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020140608 | Zaghloul et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167449 | Frazita et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196193 | Butler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042997 | Baik et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083063 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030151548 | Kingsley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184478 | Kingsley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 598 656 | May 1994 | EP |
2 268 626 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2 360 134 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2 386 475 | Sep 2003 | GB |
2 387 035 | Oct 2003 | GB |
2001-7637 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-326506 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-271133 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO 9819359 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0014826 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0131746 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0169721 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0169722 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0249154 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02058190 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03007425 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03019718 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03066071 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03079490 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03081714 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03081719 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03083991 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03098737 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03098738 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050264449 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |