Dielectric resonator comprising a dielectric resonator disk having a hole

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6169467
  • Patent Number
    6,169,467
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 18, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 2, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Pascal; Robert
    • Summons; Barbara
    Agents
    • Meschkow & Gresham, P.L.C
    • Meschkow; Jordan
    • Gresham; Lowell W.
Abstract
A TE0γδ mode dielectric resonator (12) includes a cylindrical dielectric disk (32, 32′, 32″) having top and bottom ends (20, 22) spaced apart by a closed curve wall (24). The dielectric disk has an effective dielectric constant greater than 40. An axially aligned hole (36) is formed through the disk (32) between the top and bottom ends (20, 22). A conductive wall (34, 34″) is formed at or slightly beyond the wall (24) but does not cover the top and bottom ends (20, 22). The hole (36) has a preferred diameter between 0.21 and 0.4 times the diameter of the disk (32, 32′, 32″). The disk may be configured as a heterogeneous composite of dissimilar materials which exhibit increasing dielectric constant at increasing radial distance and increasing Q at decreasing radial distance.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to radio frequency (RF) communications and to resonators used in RF communication equipment. More specifically, the present invention relates to dielectric resonators.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Resonators are useful in RF communication equipment in connection with filters, low noise oscillators, and other circuits. When a resonator with a resonant frequency in the UHF-band (i.e.<1.0 GHz) is needed, surface acoustic wave (SAW) technology provides a beneficial solution. In the UHF-band, SAW resonators are relatively small and exhibit a suitably high quality factor (Q). Unfortunately, as frequencies approach the top of the UHF-band, the resulting quality factor for SAW resonators deteriorates, and SAW resonators are usually impractical for resonant frequencies above the UHF-band.




Dielectric resonators may be used to achieve resonant frequencies at the top of the UHF-band and above. Dielectric resonators are smaller than air cavity resonators having equivalent resonant frequencies because wavelength in the dielectric resonator is divided by the square root of the resonator's dielectric constant. In addition, reactive power is not stored strictly inside the dielectric resonator, and fractional modes of resonance are exhibited. As resonant frequencies become higher, the size of the dielectric resonator becomes smaller.




Unfortunately, in the UHF-band, L-band (i.e. 1.0-2.0 GHz) and S-band (i.e. 2.0-4.0 GHz), conventional dielectric resonators are still often undesirably large or exhibit an undesirably low quality factor (Q). This frequency range is used by numerous portable RF communication devices, such as cellular and other telephones. Portable RF communication devices differ from other types of RF communication devices because of a heightened need to consume as little power as possible and to be as small and lightweight as possible. The minimal power consumption need results from portable devices being energized by batteries, and the size and weight are important because such devices are often designed to be carried on the persons of the users of the devices. Unfortunately, a resonator having a low quality factor can cause excessive power consumption, while a resonator that is too large can unnecessarily increase the size and weight of a portable device.




As an example, a conventional cylindrical TE


01δ


mode dielectric resonator, where “δ” indicates a fraction of periodicity in the “Z” direction, having a dielectric constant of around 80 and a lowest resonant frequency of around 1.8 GHz has a diameter of around 2.0 cm and an axial length of around 0.8 cm. The use of a component of such large size and corresponding large weight is highly undesirable in a portable RF communication device. Moreover, even with a conductive cavity surrounding the resonator that further increases size, such a resonator exhibits an undesirably low Q. TM


01δ


mode and other conventional TE and TM mode dielectric resonators tend to be even larger and/or exhibit lower Q.




A conventional practice in connection with dielectric resonators, such as the above-discussed TE


01δ


mode and TM


01δ


dielectric resonators, is to form a small, axially aligned hole through a cylindrical dielectric resonator. The hole serves two functions. It further separates the lowest resonant frequency from the next lowest resonant mode, and it allows the resonator to be mounted using a dielectric screw having a low dielectric constant. The hole has as small a diameter as possible to accommodate a screw large enough to securely mount a given resonator. The use of a hole no larger than necessary to meet mechanical mounting requirements does not significantly influence the performance of the resonator in the lowest resonant frequency mode. Conventionally, a hole less than 0.21 times the resonator's diameter achieves this purpose for resonators having a lowest resonant frequency in the 0.3-6.0 GHz range. However, as the hole size increases relative to the diameter of the resonator, a given resonator risks a deteriorating quality factor and larger overall size.




Another conventional practice in connection with dielectric resonators is to place the resonators within a conductive housing. Conductive walls of the housing influence the performance of the resonator, typically by lowering the resonant frequency and raising the Q as the conductive walls are placed farther from the dielectric resonator. Unfortunately, this practice only makes the resonators that much larger for a given lowest resonant frequency. A conventional TE


01δ


mode resonator that employs a conductive housing has a minimum radius of


0.8λ/{square root over (ε


r


)}, where ε




r


is the dielectric constant of the dielectric resonator. A conventional TM


01δ


mode resonator that employs a conductive housing has a minimum radius of


0.75λ/{square root over (ε


r


)}. Moreover the formation of a small, axially aligned hole through a cylindrical dielectric resonator configured for the TM




01δ


mode forces the resulting structure to be even larger for the same lowest resonant frequency.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, it is an advantage of the present invention that an improved dielectric resonator is provided.




Another advantage of the present invention is that a TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator is provided which achieves suitably high Q in a smaller space than is required by conventional TE


01δ


mode or TM


01δ


mode dielectric resonators.




Another advantage of the present invention is that a relatively large hole in a cylindrical dielectric resonator, preferably greater than 0.21 times the diameter of the resonator, and a conductive wall cause a fractional resonant mode in the radial direction.




Another advantage of the present invention is that a composite dielectric resonator is provided which, given a desired oscillation mode, increases Q while reducing resonator diameter.




The above and other advantages of the present invention are carried out in one form by a resonator configured to resonate in the TE


0γδ


mode at a lowest resonant frequency having a wavelength λ in empty space. The resonator includes a dielectric resonator disk configured to exhibit an effective dielectric constant ε


re


. The disk has first and second opposing ends along an axis of the disk and a closed curve wall surrounding the disk axis and extending between the first and second ends. The disk has a hole penetrating therein from the first disk end and extending toward the second disk end, wherein at least one of the first and second ends serves as a boundary between the disk and a dielectric material having a dielectric constant less than 0.5ε


re


. A conductive wall is juxtaposed with the curved wall of the disk and positioned less than


0.75λ/{square root over (ε


re


)} from the axis.






The above and other advantages of the present invention are carried out in another form by a resonator having a first dielectric resonator disk and a second dielectric resonator disk. The first dielectric resonator disk has a hole therein and is formed from a first material which exhibits a first dielectric constant and a first quality factor (Q). The second dielectric resonator disk is located inside the hole of the first dielectric resonator disk. The second disk is formed from a second material which exhibits a second dielectric constant and a second quality factor (Q).











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar items throughout the Figures, and:





FIG. 1

shows a cut-away perspective view of a physical layout for a circuit which includes a TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 2

shows a cut-away side view of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 3

shows a top view of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 4

shows curves for Bessel functions of the first kind;





FIG. 5

shows curves for Bessel functions of the second kind;





FIG. 6

shows exemplary curves which depict tangential magnetic and electric field intensities in the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator as a function of radial distance;





FIG. 7

shows a top view of a second embodiment of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 8

shows a top view of a third embodiment of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 9

shows a top view of a fourth embodiment of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator;





FIG. 10

shows a side view of the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator shown in

FIG. 8

; and





FIG. 11

shows exemplary curves which depict tangential magnetic and electric field intensities in the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator as a function of radial distance for the TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator shown in FIG.


8


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

shows a cut-away perspective view of a physical layout for a section of a circuit


10


which includes a TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


. Circuit


10


is a microstrip circuit, such as may be included in an oscillator or filter (not shown). Circuit


10


includes a conductive ground plane


14


underlying a dielectric substrate


16


. A conductive microstrip trace


18


is clad to the side of substrate


16


that opposes ground plane


14


.




Resonator


12


is preferably configured in a generally cylindrical or tubular geometry and has a top end


20


which opposes a bottom end


22


and is spaced apart from bottom end


22


by a distance defined by a closed curved wall


24


that extends between ends


20


and


22


. Resonator


12


is mounted near trace


18


on the side of substrate


16


that carries trace


18


. Bottom end


22


forms a boundary with substrate


16


, and top end


20


forms a boundary with air


26


. An axis of resonator


12


extends substantially perpendicular to substrate


16


.




Resonator


12


may be mounted to substrate


16


using a suitable dielectric screw


30


, shown in phantom, or using a suitable dielectric adhesive (not shown). Screw


30


may be formed from TEFLON® or another dielectric material which has similar mechanical properties and exhibits a low dielectric constant.




In the preferred embodiment, an electromagnetic signal having a frequency in the range of 0.3 to 6.0 GHz is impressed upon a transmission line formed from trace


18


and ground plane


14


. While higher frequency signals may also be used, the beneficial size advantages of resonator


12


achieved for such higher frequencies are not as pronounced as in the preferred frequency range of 0.3 to 6.0 GHz. This signal produces a magnetic field having field lines surrounding trace


18


, as designated by the letter H in FIG.


1


. Due to the proximity of resonator


12


to trace


18


and to the orientation of resonator


12


, magnetic field H is strongly coupled to resonator


12


in the tangential direction, which extends between top and bottom ends


20


and


22


of resonator


12


.




Of course, those skilled in the art will appreciate that resonator


12


is not limited to being used in a microstrip circuit or to the precise manner of coupling discussed above. Rather, microstrip circuit


10


merely represents one of many possible useful circuits within which resonator


12


may be used.





FIG. 2

shows a side view and

FIG. 3

shows a top view of a first embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


. Referring to FIGS.


1


-


3


, resonator


12


is configured to have a lowest resonant frequency at a fractional mode in both the radial and axial directions. The “γ” and “δ” subscripts in the TE


0γδ


mode designation represent fractional periodicities in radial and axial directions, respectively. In particular, resonator


12


is formed from a dielectric disk


32


and a conductive wall


34


.




Disk


32


is formed from a substantially homogeneous dielectric material in this embodiment. The selected material preferably has a dielectric constant (ε


r


)>40 throughout disk


32


. In addition, this material preferably exhibits an unloaded quality factor (Q)>3000 in the desired frequency range of 0.3-6.0 GHz. Materials having higher dielectric constants are more desirable than lower dielectric constants because such materials allow the dimensions of resonator


12


to shrink accordingly for a given resonant frequency. Likewise, materials having higher Q values are more desirable than lower Q value materials because higher Q values allow resonator


12


to exhibit a higher quality factor.




Accordingly, the dielectric material from which disk


32


is formed is selected to balance a high dielectric constant parameter against quality factor. One such material is commercially available from the Trans-Tech corporation of Adamstown, Md., USA, under the trade name: “8600 Series.” This material is a ceramic composition substantially of Ba, lanthanides and Ti-oxide. However, other dielectric materials known to those skilled in the art which meet the desired dielectric constant and quality factor criteria may be used as well.




Conductive wall


34


, is desirably a highly conductive material, such as copper, silver or gold. In the preferred embodiment, conductive wall


34


is a coating that is applied to closed curve wall


24


of resonator


12


so that it substantially entirely covers wall


24


, but conductive wall


34


desirably does not cover a significant portion of either top or bottom ends


20


and


22


. In alternate embodiments discussed below, conductive wall


34


may be formed from a resonant cavity wall which contacts wall


24


of disk


32


or is spaced apart from wall


24


.




As an applied coating, conductive wall


34


may be depicted in exaggerated thickness relative to the dimensions of disk


32


in the figures for clarity. Not only does coating


34


refrain from coating top and bottom ends


20


and


22


, but no other conductor is permitted to contact top and bottom ends


20


and


22


.




An axially aligned hole


36


penetrates into resonator


12


from the centers of top and bottom sides


20


and


22


and extends entirely through resonator


12


between sides


20


and


22


. Resonator


12


has a cylinder diameter D


c


. Cylinder diameter D


c


defines the diameter of dielectric disk


32


, but conductive wall


34


may be sufficiently thin that diameter D


c


can also be viewed as the diameter of resonator


12


. Hole


36


has a diameter D


h


that allows resonator


12


to be effective when>0.1D


c


. However, the best size and quality factor results appear to occur when 0.21D


c


≦D


h


≦0.4D


c


.




Conductive wall


34


is not extended within hole


36


. The boundary of dielectric disk


32


within hole


36


and at top and bottom ends


20


and


22


is formed with a different dielectric material. The dielectric constants of these different boundary materials are desirably significantly less than dielectric constant ε


r


of disk


32


. These boundary materials include air


26


at top end


20


and potentially inside hole


36


, screw


30


potentially inside hole


36


, and substrate


16


and/or an adhesive at bottom end


22


. Effective results are achieved when such boundary materials exhibit dielectric constants less than 0.5ε


r


, but the most practical results occur when such materials exhibit dielectric constants less than five.




An axial length (L) defines the distance between top and bottom ends


20


and


22


. Resonator


12


is configured so that cylinder diameter D


c


is roughly


0.5λ/{square root over (ε


r


)} or less and so that axial length L of resonator 12 is less than




0.5λ/{square root over (ε


r


)}, where λ is the wavelength of the lowest resonant frequency of resonator 12 in empty space. This configuration is accomplished in the manner discussed below in connection with FIGS. 4-6.







FIG. 4

shows curves for Bessel functions of the first kind,

FIG. 5

shows curves for Bessel functions of the second kind, and

FIG. 6

shows exemplary curves which depict tangential magnetic and electric field intensities in the first embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


as a function of radial distance.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, Bessel functions of the first kind for n=0 and n=1 roughly depict normalized TE mode tangential magnetic and electric field intensities, respectively, in an axial direction of a high dielectric constant, cylindrical space as a function of radial distance for the cylindrical space. The high dielectric constant is evaluated relative to an empty space surrounding the cylindrical space. The axial direction is depicted in

FIG. 4

along a vertical axis and the radial direction is depicted along a horizontal axis. The n=1 curve has zeros at the radial distances where the n=0 curve has maxima and minima. The cylindrical space may be provided by a solid, dielectric material having a cylindrical shape or by a cylindrical-shaped dielectric having an axially aligned hole of small diameter (e.g.<21%) relative to the diameter of the cylinder, such as provided by a conventional TE


01δ


resonator.




TE resonant modes are supported at wavelengths that have predetermined relationships with the radial distance. For example, the radial distances at which the n=0 and n=1 curves exhibit zeros potentially support resonant modes. In accordance with the relationships depicted in

FIG. 4

, the lowest resonant frequency is potentially achieved in the smallest radial distance where the n=0 curve experiences its first zero. By configuring a dielectric disk so that a magnetic wall forms at or beyond the curved wall of the disk, a standing wave can be supported within the disk. In TE


01


mode resonators, this standing wave is confined within the resonator and exhibits zeros at radial distances at or within the walls of the resonator. The relationship between disk characteristics and wavelength for the lowest resonant frequency is known to those skilled in the art to be a function of disk dielectric constant, disk diameter, disk volume, and a constant based on the speed of light.




As an axially aligned hole of a disk resonator increases in size relative to the disk diameter, its influence over the magnetic and electric field intensities increases. In particular,

FIG. 5

depicts Bessel functions of the second kind for n=0 and n=1 that roughly depict normalized TE mode tangential magnetic and electric field intensities, respectively, in an axial direction of a low dielectric constant cylindrical space as a function of radial distance. The low dielectric constant space is evaluated relative to a higher dielectric constant surrounding space. The axial direction is depicted in

FIG. 5

along a vertical axis and the radial direction is depicted along a horizontal axis. The n=1 curve has zeros at the radial distances where the n=0 curve has maxima and minima. Accordingly, the second kind of Bessel functions depicted in

FIG. 5

show magnetic and electric field intensities for a hole, such as hole


36


(FIGS.


1


-


3


) formed in a disk. So long as the hole is small relative to the cylinder diameter, the influence is small, and the resulting field intensity performance resembles the curves depicted in FIG.


4


.




As a first order approximation, the performance of resonator


12


is depicted in

FIG. 6

by the combination of n=0 and n=1 curves from

FIGS. 4 and 5

. The n=0 curves from

FIGS. 4 and 5

combine to generate an exemplary H


z


curve in

FIG. 6

, and the n=1 curves from

FIGS. 4 and 5

combine to generate an exemplary E


z


curve in FIG.


6


. The n=0 and n=1 curves are combined after appropriate scaling, which is a function of relative dielectric constants and relative hole sizes. Due to a wide range of possible variations in the H


z


and E


z


curves caused by this scaling, the actual field intensities of resonators


12


configured in accordance with the teaching of the present invention may resemble the

FIG. 6

curves only in prominent features. For example, the E


z


curve experiences zeros at radial distances where the H


z


curve experiences maxima and minima.




Likewise, as depicted by

FIG. 6

, with dielectric constant ε


r


>40 and with hole diameter D


h


>0.1D


c


, a minimum


38


appears in the magnetic field intensity H


z


along the axis of resonator


12


. For comparison purposes,

FIG. 6

depicts the n=0, first kind of Bessel function from

FIG. 4

as dotted line J


0


. Minimum


38


causes maxima


40


to occur at a shorter radial distance than where J


0


experiences its first zero. Larger hole diameters D


h


and greater dielectric constants ε


r


lead to a more pronounced dip between minimum


38


and maxima


40


. In other words, larger hole diameters D


h


and greater dielectric constants ε


r


increase the variation in axial intensity between minimum


38


and maxima


40


for a given radial distance from minimum


38


to maxima


40


. More pronounced dips are preferred because they lead to higher quality factor parameters for resonator


12


. For that reason, disk


32


preferably exhibits a dielectric constant ε


r


less than 40 and a hole diameter D


h


greater than or equal to 0.21D


c


.




As hole diameter D


h


increases relative to cylinder diameter D


c


, maxima


40


move radially outward. At around D


h


=0.4D


c


, maxima


40


reside at roughly the radial distance where curve J


0


exhibits its first zero. Accordingly, hole diameter D


h


is preferably less than or equal to 0.4D


c


so that resonator


12


has a smaller size for a given lowest resonant frequency than would a corresponding conventional TE


01δ


mode resonator having a small hole and exhibiting a magnetic field intensity exemplified by curve J


0


.




As exemplified by curve E


z


, the electric field intensity within resonator


12


at the lowest resonant frequency experiences zeros at maxima


40


. In order to force this electric field intensity performance to occur, an electric wall is formed at curved wall


24


by the application of conductive wall


34


. Accordingly, the dimensions of resonator


12


, and particularly of cylinder diameter D


c


, exert a large influence on the lowest resonant frequency for resonator


12


. At the lowest resonant frequency, the electric wall imposed by conductive wall


34


forces the electric field intensity to equal zero at wall


24


of resonator


12


.




The forcing of the electric field intensity to equal zero at wall


24


allows a standing wave to build within and without dielectric resonator


12


at a frequency having a wavelength determined by cylinder diameter D


c


. Less than 0.5 of a wavelength and with preferential selection of hole diameter D


h


and dielectric constant ε


r


, less than 0.25 of a wavelength resides within resonator


12


in the radial direction at the lowest resonant frequency. Likewise, by forming a boundary with a low dielectric constant material at top and bottom ends


20


and


22


, less then 0.5 of a wavelength resides within resonator


12


in the axial direction at the lowest resonant frequency. The result is a TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator with a smaller diameter than a corresponding TE


01δ


dielectric resonator having the same lowest resonant frequency.





FIG. 7

shows a top view of a second embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


. This second embodiment differs from the first embodiment discussed above in that homogeneous disk


32


is replaced in this second embodiment with a heterogeneous dielectric disk


32


′. In particular, disk


32


′ is formed from outer and inner disks


44


and


46


, respectively, each of which has axial holes therein. Inner disk


46


is located inside the hole of outer disk


44


, and the above-discussed hole


36


of resonator


12


is formed in inner disk


46


. Disks


44


and


46


are also referred to as rings


44


and


46


herein. Desirably, rings


44


and


46


are substantially coaxial, have substantially equivalent lengths along their common axis


48


, and are positioned so that rings


44


and


46


are aligned at top and bottom ends


20


and


22


(

FIG. 2

) of heterogeneous disk


32


′. The above-discussed dimensions D


h


and D


c


apply to this second embodiment in the same manner as discussed above.




Desirably, outer ring


44


is thinner than inner ring


46


. Outer ring


44


has an outside diameter


50


and an inside diameter


52


. The ratio of inside diameter


52


to outside diameter


50


is greater than 0.5 and preferably in the range of 0.7 to 0.9. Inner ring


46


has an outside diameter


54


and an inside diameter


56


. The ratio of inside diameter


56


to outside diameter


54


is desirably greater than the equivalent ratio for outer ring


44


.




An inter-ring gap


58


exists between outer ring


44


at its inside diameter


52


and inner ring


46


at its outside diameter


54


. Gap


58


is provided to accommodate mechanical tolerance mismatches between outer ring


44


and inner ring


46


. In addition, outer ring


44


and inner ring


46


are formed from dissimilar materials. Accordingly, gap


58


is dimensioned to accommodate diverse thermal expansion characteristics of the dissimilar materials. Allowing for these two considerations, gap


58


is desirably as small as possible, and is illustrated in an exaggerated form in the Figures for clarity.




Desirably, gap


58


is occupied by a dielectric material that exhibits a dielectric constant less than 0.5 ε


re


, where ε


re


is the effective dielectric constant of disk


32


′ across outer ring


44


and inner ring


46


. This effective dielectric constant ε


re


is roughly the average of the dielectric constants ε


r


of the dissimilar materials. Effective dielectric constant ε


re


is used herein to refer to homogeneous and heterogeneous dielectric resonator disks


32


,


32


′ and the like, and not to air or other low dielectric constant material gaps which may be present in resonator


12


. In the preferred embodiments, gap


58


is occupied by a thermally conductive glue which serves to bond outer and inner rings


44


and


46


together and promote heat transfer.




The material from which outer ring


44


is formed has a particularly high dielectric constant ε


r


, even at the cost of accepting an undesirably low Q. In the preferred embodiment, this material desirably has an ε


r


greater than 40 and preferably greater than 70, even though the Q of such a material may be on the order of around 3000. However, a balance of high dielectric constant and high Q is desired. In contrast, the material from which inner ring


46


is formed has a significantly higher Q than that of outer ring


44


, even at the cost of a lower ε


r


. In the preferred embodiment, this inner ring material desirably has a Q on the order of 30,000 or more, even though the ε


r


of such a material may be less than 40.





FIG. 8

shows a top view of a third embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator. This third embodiment differs from the first and second embodiments discussed above in that homogeneous disk


32


(

FIG. 2

) or heterogeneous disk


32


′ (

FIG. 7

) is replaced in this third embodiment with a heterogeneous dielectric disk


32


″ and in that disk


32


″ is placed in a conductive housing so that a conductive wall


34


′ is not applied as a coating to disks


32


and


32


′ (

FIGS. 3 and 7

) but is spaced away from side wall


24


of disk


32


″.




Heterogeneous disk


32


″ differs from heterogeneous disk


32


′ (

FIG. 7

) in that inner disk


46


of disk


32


′ (

FIG.7

) is replaced by a middle disk


60


and an innermost disk


62


. Outer disk


44


remains configured as discussed above. Middle disk


60


and innermost disk


62


each have axial holes therein. Innermost disk


62


is located inside the hole of middle disk


60


, and the above-discussed hole


36


of resonator


12


is formed in innermost disk


62


. Disks


60


and


62


are also referred to as rings


60


and


62


herein. Desirably, rings


60


and


62


are substantially coaxial, have substantially equivalent lengths along their common axis


48


, and are positioned so that rings


44


,


60


and


62


are aligned at top and bottom ends


20


and


22


(

FIG. 2

) of heterogeneous disk


32


″. The above-discussed dimensions D


h


and D


c


apply to this third embodiment in the same manner as discussed above.




Desirably, innermost ring


62


is thinner than middle ring


60


. Innermost ring


62


has an outside diameter


64


and an inside diameter


66


. The ratio of inside diameter


66


to outside diameter


64


is greater than 0.5 and preferably in the range of 0.7 to 0.9. Accordingly, innermost ring


62


has an aspect ratio similar to that of outer ring


44


. Middle ring


60


has an outside diameter


54


and an inside diameter


68


. The ratio of inside diameter


68


to outside diameter


54


is desirably greater than the equivalent ratio for either outer ring


44


or innermost ring


62


. An inter-ring gap


70


exists between middle ring


60


at its inside diameter


68


and innermost ring


62


at its outside diameter


64


. Gap


70


is desirably configured similarly to gap


58


.




In this third embodiment, middle ring


60


is formed from the same material as inner ring


46


of the second embodiment (FIG.


7


). Thus, middle ring


60


exhibits a significantly higher Q than outer ring


44


but a lower dielectric constant ε


r


. Innermost ring


62


is formed from a material that is dissimilar to the materials from which either outer ring


44


or middle ring


60


is formed. The material selected for innermost ring


62


desirably exhibits a lower ε


r


than that of middle and outer rings


60


and


44


, but still desirably greater than 0.5ε


r


of middle ring


60


. In the preferred embodiment, ε


r


of innermost ring


62


is desirably less than 30, but less than or equal to the ε


r


of middle ring


60


in any event. The Q of such a material may well exceed 40,000.




The positioning of conductive walls


34


′ relative to heterogeneous disk


32


″ in this third embodiment could likewise be applied to homogeneous disk


32


(

FIG. 3

) or heterogeneous disk


32


′ (FIG.


7


). Accordingly, mention of disk


32


below will refer to any of disks


32


,


32


′ or


32


″. Unlike a conventional TE


01δ


resonator, the lowest resonant frequency of resonator


12


increases as conductive walls


34


′ are positioned further away from side wall


24


of disk


32


. Accordingly, in order to get the lowest resonant frequency in the smallest package, conductive walls


34


′ are desirably juxtaposed as close to side wall


24


as possible. However, as conductive walls


34


′ are moved closer to side wall


24


, Q drops. Accordingly, conductive walls


34


′ are positioned to balance these two opposing considerations. Moreover, in order to achieve TE


0γδ


mode resonance, conductive walls


34


′ are desirably positioned a radial distance away from axis


48


less than


0.25λ/{square root over (ε


re


)}, where ε




re


is the effective dielectric constant for disk


32


. A gap


72


which may form between disk


32


and conductive wall


34


′ is desirably occupied with a dielectric material exhibiting a dielectric constant <0.5ε


re


, such as air or a suitable dielectric spacer.




As discussed above, diameter D


c


of disk


32


(

FIGS. 2

,


3


and


6


) is preferably less than


0.5λ/{square root over (ε


re


)} when conductive wall 34 is applied as a coating to side wall 24 of disk 32. Accordingly, the radial distance of conductive wall 34 is preferably less than




0.25λ/{square root over (ε


re


)} away from axis 48 when conductive wall 34 is applied as a coating to side wall 24. When conductive wall 34′ is spaced apart from disk 32 by gap 72, the diameter D




c


of disk


32


may increase a small amount to hold the same lowest resonant frequency. Accordingly, the maximum distance of conductive wall


34


′ away from axis


48


is less than


0.75λ/{square root over (ε


re


)} and preferably less than




0.6λ/{square root over (ε


re


)}. Even by spacing conductive wall 34′ its maximum distance away from axis 48 while still achieving TE




0γδ


mode resonance, the overall size of resonator


12


is less than otherwise equivalent TE


01δ


, and TM


01δ


mode resonators.





FIG. 9

shows a top view of a fourth embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


. This fourth embodiment differs from the third embodiment of

FIG. 8

in that conductive walls


34


′ are formed by a conductive housing that has a square cross-sectional shape rather than a round or cylindrical shape. The maximum spacing of conductive walls


34


′ from disk side wall


24


is measured at the closest point between walls


34


′ and side wall


24


. While this fourth embodiment provides some slight degradation in performance compared to the third embodiment of

FIG. 8

, the square-shaped housing of

FIG. 9

achieves sufficient manufacturing cost savings over the cylindrical housing of

FIG. 8

to justify the degradation in some applications, particularly when resonator


12


is configured to operate at lower resonant frequencies.





FIG. 10

shows a side view of the third embodiment of TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


, the top view of which is shown in FIG.


8


. As illustrated in

FIGS. 8 and 10

, conductive walls


34


′ may be extended to completely enclose disk


32


in a resonant cavity. Input and output signals may be provided via probes


74


or suitable slots (not shown). As shown in

FIG. 10

, conductive walls


34


′ extend far beyond top and bottom ends


20


and


22


, and are capped off to completely enclose disk


32


within a resonant cavity that has an air or other low dielectric constant (i.e. less than 0.5ε


re


) material gaps


76


above and below disk


32


.




In order to achieve TE


0γδ


mode resonance, no conductive walls are positioned closer than


0.25λ/{square root over (ε


re


)} from top and bottom ends 20 and 22 of disk 32. Accordingly, conductive walls 34′ are positioned relative to disk 32 so that gaps 76 extend for a distance of at least


0.25λ/{square root over (ε


re


)}.





FIG. 11

shows exemplary curves which depict tangential magnetic and electric field intensities in TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator


12


as a function of radial distance for the third embodiment of resonator


12


shown in FIG.


8


. As discussed above in connection with

FIG. 6

, due to a wide range of possible variations in the H


z


and E


z


curves, the actual field intensities of resonators


12


configured in accordance with the teaching of the present invention may resemble the

FIG. 11

curves only in prominent features.




In comparing the curves of

FIG. 11

with those of

FIG. 6

, maxima


40


again occur at the outer edge of disk


32


″, but are shifted slightly inside disk


32


from wall


24


in this third embodiment. Since the H


z


field tends to pool in materials with high ε


r


, the positions maxima


40


are stable within outer ring


44


of disk


32


″.




The high dielectric constant ε


r


of outer ring


44


provides a prominent contribution to raising the effective dielectric constant ε


re


and reducing the wavelength at resonance within disk


32


″. Accordingly while heterogeneous disk


32


″ may be larger than homogeneous disk


32


(FIG.


3


), other factors remaining the same, the increase in size is modest due to this prominent contribution of outer ring


44


.




In lower Q materials the E


z


field experiences more attenuation than in higher Q materials. Unfortunately, commercially practical dielectric materials having high dielectric constants ε


r


tend to exhibit lower Q's than desired. The thickness of outer ring


44


is indicated in

FIG. 11

between vertical dotted lines


78


and


80


. In this region, the E


z


field is nearly zero due to TE mode oscillation and the proximity of conductive wall


34


′. Accordingly, the exaggerated attenuation of the E


z


field experienced in this lower Q region is not nearly as pronounced as it would be if it were applied where the E


z


field reaches a maximum. Rather, the higher Q material of middle ring


60


is applied where the E


z


field reaches a maximum.




Optional innermost ring


62


exhibits a lower ε


r


than riddle ring


60


to provide enhanced mode separation. The H


E11


mode resonance, which is at a higher frequency than the TE


0γδ


mode resonance, becomes lower as the dielectric constant ε


r


in the center of disk


32


″ increases. Accordingly, by slightly lowering ε


r


in the center of disk


32


″ the separation between the TE


0γδ


mode and the H


E11


modes increases.




In summary, the present invention provides an improved TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator. This TE


0γδ


mode dielectric resonator achieves suitably high Q in a smaller space than required by a conventional TE


01δ


mode or TM


01δ


mode dielectric resonator. A relatively large hole in a cylindrical dielectric resonator, preferably greater than 0.21 times the diameter of the resonator, and a conductive wall cause a fractional resonant mode in the radial direction. A heterogeneous or composite dielectric resonator, optionally in conjunction with a conductive housing, may achieve a high Q while maintaining a small size for the resonator. In the preferred embodiment, a Q approaching 10,000 is achieved in a resonator having conductive housing with a diameter less than 1.2λ/{square root over (ε


re


)}.




The present invention has been described above with reference to preferred embodiments. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes and modifications may be made in these preferred embodiments without departing from she scope of the present invention. Such changes and modifications which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. A resonator configured to resonate in the TE0γδ mode at a lowest resonant frequency having a wavelength λ in empty space, said resonator comprising:a dielectric resonator disk configured to exhibit an effective dielectric constant εre, said disk having first and second opposing ends along an axis and a closed curve wall surrounding said axis and extending between said first and second ends, said disk having a hole penetrating therein from said first end and extending toward said second end, wherein at least one of said first and second ends serves as a boundary between said disk and a dielectric material having a dielectric constant less than 0.5εre; and a conductive wall juxtaposed with said curved wall of said disk and positioned less than 0.75λ/{square root over (εre)} from said axis.
  • 2. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein:said hole extends through said disk from said first end to said second end; said disk is shaped as a cylinder having a diameter D; and said hole exhibits a diameter greater than 0.1D.
  • 3. A resonator as claimed in claim 2 wherein said hole exhibits a diameter greater than 0.21D.
  • 4. A resonator as claimed in claim 3 wherein said hole exhibits a diameter less than 0.4D.
  • 5. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein said dielectric material having a dielectric constant less than 0.5εre extends away from said boundary for a distance of at least 0.25λ/{square root over (εre)}.
  • 6. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein no conductive wall is positioned closer than 0.25λ/{square root over (εre)} from said first or second ends of said disk.
  • 7. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein said conductive wall is positioned less than 0.6 λ/{square root over (εre)} from said axis.
  • 8. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein said disk has an axial length of less than 0.5λ/{square root over (εre)}.
  • 9. A resonator as claimed in claim 1 wherein said disk is comprised of first and second rings which exhibit different dielectric constants and different quality factors (Q).
  • 10. A resonator as claimed in claim 9 wherein:said first ring is concentric with and resides outside of said second ring; said first and second rings each have inside and outside diameters; and the ratio of said inside diameter of said first ring to said outside diameter of said first ring is less than the ratio of said inside diameter of said second ring to said outside diameter of said second ring.
  • 11. A resonator as claimed in claim 9 wherein:said first ring resides outside of said second ring; and said first ring exhibits a higher dielectric constant than said second ring.
  • 12. A resonator as claimed in claim 9 wherein said disk additionally comprises a third ring which exhibits a different dielectric constant and quality factor (Q) from the dielectric constants and quality factors (Q) of said first and second rings.
  • 13. A resonator as claimed in claim 9 wherein:said first ring is concentric with and resides outside of said second ring; an inter-ring gap exists between said first and second rings; and said inter-ring gap is occupied by a dielectric material having a dielectric constant<0.5εre.
  • 14. A resonator configured to resonate in the TE0γδ mode at a lowest resonant frequency having a wavelength λ in empty space, said resonator comprising:a composite dielectric disk having first and second dielectric rings which have a common axis with said first ring being located outside said second ring, said first dielectric ring exhibiting a greater dielectric constant than said second ring and said first and second rings collectively exhibiting an effective dielectric constant εre, said first ring having an outside diameter D, and said second ring having an axially aligned interior hole occupied by a material exhibiting a dielectric constant less than 0.5εre and exhibiting a diameter greater than or equal to 0.21D but less than or equal to 0.4D; and a conductive wall circumferentially surrounding said composite dielectric disk and positioned less than 0.75λ/{square root over (εre)} from said axis.
  • 15. A resonatorhaving a lowest resonant frequency with a wavelength λ in empty space and an effective dielectric constant εre, said resonator comprising: a first dielectric resonator disk formed from a first material which exhibits a first dielectric constant and a first quality factor (Q), having a hole therein, and having a closed curve wall surrounding an axis of said first disk; a conductive wall surrounding said first disk and positioned less than 0.75λ/{square root over (εre)} from said axis; and a second dielectric resonator disk located inside said hole of said first dielectric resonator disk, said second disk being formed from a second material which exhibits a second dielectric constant and a second quality factor (Q).
  • 16. A resonator as claimed in claim 15 wherein:said first disk has an outside diameter D; and said second disk has an axially aligned hole therein, said second disk hole being occupied by a material exhibiting a dielectric constant less than 0.5εre and exhibiting a diameter greater than or equal to 0.21D but less than or equal to 0.4D.
  • 17. A resonator as claimed in claim 15 wherein each of said first and second disks has an axial length of less than 0.5λ/{square root over (εre)}.
  • 18. A resonator comprising:a first dielectric resonator disk having a hole therein, said first disk being formed from a first material which exhibits a first dielectric constant and a first quality factor (Q); a second dielectric resonator disk having a hole therein and located inside said hole of said first dielectric resonator disk, said second disk being formed from a second material which exhibits a second dielectric constant and a second quality factor (Q); and a third dielectric resonator disk positioned inside said hole of said second disk, said second disk exhibiting a higher dielectric constant than said third disk.
  • 19. A resonator as claimed in claim 18 wherein:said first disk exhibits a dielectric constant greater than 40; and said second disk exhibits a dielectric constant less than 40.
  • 20. A resonator comprising:a first dielectric resonator disk having a hole therein, said first disk being formed from a first material which exhibits a first dielectric constant and a first quality factor (Q); a second dielectric resonator disk located inside said hole of and concentric with said first disk, said second disk having a hole therein and being formed from a second material which exhibits a second dielectric constant and a second quality factor (Q); said first and second disks each have inside and outside diameters; and the ratio of said inside diameter of said first disk to said outside diameter of said first disk is less than the ratio of said inside diameter of said second disk to said outside diameter of said second disk.
  • 21. A resonator comprising:a first dielectric resonator disk having a hole therein, said first disk being formed from a first material which exhibits a first dielectric constant and a first quality factor (Q); a second dielectric resonator disk having a hole therein and located inside said hole of said first dielectric resonator disk, said second disk being formed from a second material which exhibits a second dielectric constant and a second quality factor (Q); and a third dielectric resonator disk located within said hole of said second disk, said third disk exhibiting a different dielectric constant and quality factor (Q) from the dielectric constants and quality factors (Q) of said first and second disks.
RELATED INVENTION

The present invention is a continuation in part (CIP) of “TE0γδ MODE DIELECTRIC RESONATOR,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/099,621, filed June 18, 1998, now abandoned, which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
2890422 Schlicke Jun 1959
3798578 Konishi et al. Mar 1974
4521746 Hwan et al. Jun 1985
4668925 Towatari et al. May 1987
4706052 Hattori et al. Nov 1987
4728913 Ishikawa et al. Mar 1988
4835498 Rouger et al. May 1989
5325077 Ishikawa et al. Jun 1994
5859574 Schmitt Jan 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 492 304 A1 Jul 1992 EP
60-98703 Jun 1985 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Cheng-Chyi You, Chen-Liang Huang and Chung-Chuang Wei, “Single-Block Ceramic Microwave Bandpass Filters”, The Microwave Journal, Nov. 1994, pp. 24-35.
Trans-Tech, Inc., “Dielectric Resonators and Related Products—A Designer's Guide to Microwave Dielectric Ceramics”, Apr. 1993.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/099621 Jun 1998 US
Child 09/215856 US