The field of the invention generally relates to micro- and nano-fabrication processes and methods used to control surface morphology of the fabricated surface features. The field of the invention also relates to functional devices formed using the processes and methods described herein (e.g., sensors, biosensors, and the like).
Currently there is a lack of a fast, efficient, and scalable manufacturing process for adding micro-features to electrode systems. Wet and dry etching processes have been employed with various degrees of success. Dry etching typically consists of performing an oxygen plasma etching process over the underlying structure. Plasma etching has been successfully applied to improve the response of electrochemical sensors through an increase of their hydrophilicity. However, this technique will only increase the access of the solution to small porosities already available in the underlying base material, but will not significantly affect total surface area (e.g., features size is too small). Another option may be found on electrochemical pretreatment (ECP), however, exposing a conductive structure to a DC potential while immersed in a basic solution causes breakage in the structure, causing permanent damage. A competing approach is to develop three-dimensional (3D) structures, such as posts or walls with high aspect ratio that increase the surface area; examples include, but are not limited to, arrays of posts and multilayer structures. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0203936, for example, discloses a method of making polymer-based high surface area multi-layered three-dimensional structures.
Further patterning of these three-dimensional structures might include organic beads deposited on the substrate from a liquid phase. When the liquid solution evaporates the beads are left on the surface, but the attachment is very weak and beads soon fall out. Various techniques have also been employed to increase the surface area by producing etch pits of controlled geometry. Several of the processes listed above suffer from limitations and drawbacks such as damage of the structures, long processing time, insufficient control over the desired features, complexity of the processes, and high energy consumption.
In one embodiment, a method of creating a structure on an electrode includes exposing an electrode to a solution containing a polymerizable monomer and particles and applying an Alternating Current (AC) voltage to the electrode so as to induce positive dielectrophoresis (DEP) on the particles and to draw the particles toward the electrode. A superimposed offset voltage, which can be either AC or Direct Current (DC) is applied to the electrode to perform electrodeposition (ED) of an electrically conductive polymer thereon from the polymerizable monomer, wherein the particles are entrapped on or within the polymer.
In another embodiment, a method of creating a structure on an electrode includes exposing an electrode to a solution containing a polymerizable monomer and a first plurality of particles. A first AC voltage is applied to the electrode so as to induce positive DEP on the first plurality of particles and draw the first plurality of particles toward the electrode. A first superimposed voltage offset is applied to the electrode to form an electrically conductive polymer thereon from the polymerizable monomer, wherein the first plurality of particles are entrapped on or within the electrically conductive polymer. The electrode then exposed to a solution containing the polymerizable monomer and a second plurality of particles. A second AC voltage is applied to the electrode so as to induce positive DEP on the second plurality of particles and draw the second plurality of particles toward the electrode. A second superimposed voltage offset is applied to the electrode to form an electrically conductive polymer thereon from the polymerizable monomer, wherein the second plurality of particles are entrapped on or within the electrically conductive polymer. The first and second voltage offsets may be DC or AC voltage offsets.
The process described above may be repeated any number of times to create multiple layers. In addition, the second plurality of particles may be different from the first plurality of particles. In this regard, hierarchical layers can be created through this process.
The electrode 14 may be formed from any number of materials including, for example, metals typically employed for electrodes, such as gold or nickel traces as well as carbon electrodes. While only a single electrode is illustrated in
The function generator 16 may optionally include a switch 26 that is used to selectively apply the superimposed offset voltage(s) as described herein. The switch 26 may be a button or the like that is manually actuated. Alternatively, the function generator 16 may be operably connected to a controller or other computer 28 that is used to program various operational parameters of the function generator 16 including the sequence of the superimposed offset voltage(s).
In one aspect, the solution holder 18 may be configured to hold the fluids in a batch mode whereby the mixture of fluids described herein are added and removed in batches. Alternatively, the solution holder 18 may be configured to hold the fluids in a continuous mode such that solution holder 18 is a flow cell like that illustrated in
The device 10 and fabrication process described herein include several main features including: (1) control of microstructure and surface morphology, (2) flexibility in the selection of materials to employ, and (3) low processing time. This was achieved through the combination of two techniques that are employed using the electrode 14: DEP and ED.
DEP can be described as phenomenon where a force is exerted on polarizable particles 20 when subjected to a spatially non-uniform electric field. For DEP to occur, the particles 20 must be immersed into a polarizable suspending medium. The DEP force can be positive or negative depending on the relation between the electric properties of the particles 20 and suspending medium. When the particle 20 is more polarizable than the suspending medium, the DEP force is positive, resulting in particle motion towards the zones of highest gradient of the square of the electric field (toward the electrode as indicated by the arrow of
F
DEP=2πr3εmRe{K}∇ERMS2 (1)
where r is the particle 20 radius, εm is the suspending medium permittivity, K is the complex Clausius Mossotti Factor and E is the electric field. The Clausius Mossotti factor is defined as:
In Equation (2) ε* stands for complex permittivity and subscripts p and m refer to particle and suspending medium respectively. Equation (3) describes the complex permittivity as a function of electrical permittivity ε, electrical conductivity σ, and ω is the angular frequency of the electrical signal. It is evident that DEP is a frequency dependent force. The electric bias employed to produce DEP can be either DC or AC.
ED is a technique that allows monomers to be polymerized through the application of an electric potential between the working electrode 14 and the counter-electrode 22 placed in the solution. The polymerizable monomer in solution forms an electrically conductive polymer on the working electrode 14. The deposited polymer may include a complete layer of the polymer or a partial layer of the polymer. This process can be combined with standard photolithography techniques to develop conductive three-dimensional (3D) structures such as those described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0203936 which is incorporated by reference herein. Electrodeposition is an appealing technique for microfabrication due to its simplicity, low deposition voltage (typically less than 1V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode), ability to control film thickness, and porosity of the film, and its capability to synthesize a polymer on any electrically conductive substrate.
In one aspect of the invention, the method of forming a structure on the electrode 14 employs DEP to attract particles 20 towards the electrode(s) 14 on which the particles 20 are to become permanently entrapped. In contrast to conventional DEP, where the suspending medium consists of deionized (DI) water, or buffer solutions (e.g., Phosphate Buffered Saline [PBS]), and its conductivity is controlled by the addition of salts, the particles 20 are immersed in a solution containing the polymerizable monomer and an optional dopant. The dopant may be omitted in some instances though omission of the dopant may result in reduced conductivity and thus reduced deposition rate. However, in some other alternative embodiments, the absence of a dopant may be preferred.
An example of a dopant may include Dodecyl-Benzene-Sulfonate-ion (DBS) although other ions may be used (such as chloride, bromide, polystyrene sulfonate, hexafluoroforsphate, etc.). The monomer may include pyrrole which is then polymerized to polypyrrole, a conductive polymer. Additional examples of polymerized monomers and their polymeric forms are aniline/polyaniline, thiohene/polythiophene, and other conducting polymers undergoing electrochemical polymerization.
With reference to
In some embodiments, the formed structure may then be heated in an inert environment to pyrolize the polymer to form a carbonized electrode 14.
In the waveform of
Experimental Results
A device 10 like that illustrated in
The DC offset has to be larger than the oxidation potential of the polymer to polymerize the pyrrole monomers, but small enough to avoid electrolysis at the electrodes of the electrochemical cell. Electrolysis occurs with DC potentials when the signal amplitude is larger than the electrochemical stability window of the material the electrode is made of, but it also occurs with small frequency AC signals (usually around a few KHz and below). For polystyrene beads and silicon particles employed in the experiments, the frequency employed to produce positive DEP falls into this electrolysis frequency range. The optimal parameters can be found through trial and error for each type of particle. All the electric signals were obtained from a synthesized function generator DS345 (Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, Calif.) with frequency range from 1 Hz to 33 MHz and output voltage up to 20 Vpp. Electrical connection to the chip was achieved using alligator clips.
Polystyrene beads of 10 μm in diameter were used for initial experiments. An AC signal of 6 Vpp and 500 Hz was employed to induce DEP on the beads. After 20 seconds of particle trapping, a DC offset of 0.6V was applied to the signal in order to start the polymerization of the pyrrole monomers. This offset was fixed at that value for 40 seconds and then the excitation signal was turned off The alligator clips were then unplugged from the chip. The chip was rinsed with DI water for 30 seconds in order to remove the remains of Pyrrole solution. The chip was then mounted under an Eclipse LV100 optical microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, N.Y.) with an attached SPOT RT KE CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, Mich.).
Silicon particles were also used to be incorporated using the process. In contrast to polystyrene, which is an organic material, silicon is inorganic. Including different types of materials into the process, i.e., organic, inorganic, biological materials, is important because of the several applications the invention may find. Silicon particles with an average characteristic dimension of 5 μm were suspended in a solution of 100 mM pyrrole monomers and 100 mM NaDBS. An AC signal of 4 Vpp and 600 Hz was employed to induce DEP in the particles. After 20 seconds of particle trapping, a DC offset of 0.6V was applied to the signal to initiate PPy deposition. The offset was applied for a period of 40 seconds after which the excitation signal was turned off. The chip was thoroughly rinsed with DI water in order to remove the remains of pyrrole solution as well as non-trapped particles. Visualization of the results was achieved through the LV 100 optical microscope attached to the SPOT RT KE CCD camera.
Biological particles were also employed to demonstrate the flexibility of the process and potential uses in biotechnology applications. Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (baking yeast) were permanently entrapped in PPy. The complex permittivity of live yeast is higher than that of the suspending solution at high frequencies; therefore, for DEP to pull yeast towards the electrodes, an AC signal of 6 Vpp with frequency of 1 MHz was employed as excitation source. The DEP force was induced over the particles without the influence of any DC offset for 20 seconds, then, to achieve permanent particle immobilization, a DC component of 0.6V was added to the excitation signal for 40 seconds to polymerize the Pyrrole monomers doped with NaDBS.
Another important feature of the process described herein is the ability to develop fractal structures such as that illustrated in
Finally, the addition of a pyrolysis step brings another interesting feature to the process.
The process described herein has the following benefits including: 1) surface area increase can be tailored by selecting the beads of specific size; 2) wide selection of beads/particles/cells can be employed including organic, and inorganic materials as well as biological cells; 3) fractal geometry or hierarchical structures such as having larger beads and attaching to it beads of smaller size is possible with the described technique; 4) frequency selection allows to deposit beads of specific size out of multi-phase solution; 5) bead attachment is fairly strong compared to such techniques as solvent evaporation; 6) absence of high temperature step allows work with active biomolecules.
This process can find applications in numerous fields that require control over the surface area of the microfabricated structures. For instance, in electrochemistry, structures developed with this technology can be employed to make electrodes that can be used in batteries, fuel cells and other energy storage devices, solar cells, capacitors, and sensors. In biotechnology applications this technique can be used to trap beads functionalized with biomolecules onto the surface of electrodes. Sensor or biosensors can be constructed in this manner. The technique can also be used to fabricate actuators, scaffolds, drug delivery devices, and flexible electronic structures.
In some alternative embodiments, the applied AC signal that is used for DEP may be omitted entirely. For example, in one alternative embodiment, no AC signal is applied to the electrode 14. For example, the particles 20 may be charged particles that can be electrostatically attracted to or repulsed toward (with an opposing electrode) the working electrode 14. The charged particles 20 aggregate or accumulate near the electrode 14 whereby application of a DC voltage between the working electrode 14 and the counter electrode 22 result in electro-polymerization of the polymerizable monomer in solution. The electro-polymerization entraps the charged particles 20. In one aspect, the same DC voltage may be applied to the working electrode 14 to both attract the charged particles and electro-polymerize the monomer. However, different voltages may be used for attraction and electro-polymerization. For instance, a higher voltage may be used to attract the charged particles 20. The polymerizable monomer may be flowed into the system and a lower voltage is applied (so as to avoid hydrolysis) for electro-polymerization.
In another alternative embodiment that does not utilize an AC signal, the particles 20 may be magnetic. A separate magnet (e.g., electromagnet or permanent magnet) may be located at or adjacent to the working electrode 14 to attract the particles thereto. The working electrode 14 may also be made of a magnetic material (e.g., ferromagnetic material) that attracts the particles 20 via magnetic attraction. Magnetic repulsion may also be used to force particles 20 away from a repulsing magnet (not shown) toward the working electrode 14. Once the magnetic particles 20 have aggregated or accumulated near the electrode 14, application of a DC voltage between the working electrode 14 and the counter electrode 22 results in electro-polymerization of the polymerizable monomer in solution. The electro-polymerization entraps the magnetic particles 20.
In another alternative embodiment that does not utilize an AC signal, a suspension of particles 20 may sediment on the electrodes before a DC signal is applied to entrap the particles on the electrodes. Sedimentation of particles 20 may be accelerated by subjecting the device or solution to a centrifugal force. For example, the device may be spun in a centrifugal fashion (e.g., in a disc or the like) or within a centrifuge. Particles 20 having different sizes may be selectively deposited to create hierarchical structures. For example, a device may be spun at a lower rate (e.g., lower RPM) to deposit larger sized particles 20. These larger particles 20 can be entrapped by application of a DC voltage between the working electrode 14 and the counter electrode 22 to cause the electro-polymerization of the polymerizable monomer. Subsequent increase of the rotational frequency will cause sedimentation of smaller particles that can then be entrapped on the electrodes. Thus rotational frequency of the centrifuge may be used as a controlling parameter in selectively precipitating progressively smaller particles from the solution and DC bias can be used to entrap these particles onto the electrodes.
While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except to the following claims, and their equivalents.
This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/769,657 filed on Feb. 26, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Priority is claimed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61769657 | Feb 2013 | US |