This disclosure relates to power supplies, and in particular to power converters.
Many power converters include switches and one or more capacitors that are used, for example, to power portable electronic devices and consumer electronics. Switch-mode power converters regulate the output voltage or current by switching energy storage elements (i.e. inductors and capacitors) into different electrical configurations using a switch network.
Switched-capacitor converters are switch-mode power converters that primarily use capacitors to transfer energy. These converters transfer energy from an input to an output by using switches to cycle a network of capacitors through different topological states. A common converter of this type, known as a “charge pump,” is commonly used to produce the high voltages in FLASH memories and other reprogrammable memories. Charge pumps have also been used in connection with overcoming the nuclear strong force to transform one element into another.
In a switched-capacitor converter, the number of capacitors and switches increases as the transformation ratio increases. Switches in the switch network are usually active devices that are implemented with transistors. The switch network may be integrated on a single or on multiple monolithic semiconductor substrates, or formed using discrete devices. Furthermore, since each switch in a power converter normally carries high current, it may be composed of numerous smaller switches connected in parallel.
Typical DC-DC converters perform voltage transformation and output regulation. This is usually done in a single-stage converter such as a buck converter. However, it is possible to split these two functions into two specialized stages, namely a transformation stage, such as a switching network, and a separate regulation stage, such as a regulating circuit. The transformation stage transforms one voltage into another, while the regulation stage ensures that the voltage and/or current output of the transformation stage maintains desired characteristics.
In those cases where the transformation stage and the regulating stage are close together, a direct connection is possible. However, in other cases, the regulating stage may be far from the transformation stage. Under these circumstances, it is useful to filter the output of the transformation stage to reduce loss.
In one aspect, the invention features a transformation stage for transforming a first voltage into a second voltage. Such a transformation stage includes a switching network, a filter, and a controller. The filter is configured to connect the transformation stage to a regulator, and the controller controls the switching network.
In some embodiments, the filter includes an LC filter.
In other embodiments, the filter includes an inductance that, in operation at a particular switching frequency, sustains a peak-to-peak voltage ripple and supports an inductor current that passes into a load, the inductor current defining an average inductor current. Among these are embodiments in which the inductance is selected by dividing the peak-to-peak voltage ripple by a product of the average inductor current and the switching frequency multiplied by 13/24.
Some embodiments include the regulating circuit.
Also among the embodiments are those in which the filter is configured to connect the transformation stage to more than one regulator.
Yet other embodiments include plural regulating circuits, wherein the filter connects the transformation stage to all of the regulators.
Also among the embodiments are those in which the transformation stage includes plural switching networks. In these embodiments, the filter connects to all of the switching networks to a regulating circuit.
Other embodiments include those in which the transformation stage includes a plurality of units in series. Each unit includes a switching network in series with a filter.
Typical DC-DC converters perform voltage transformation and output regulation. This is usually done in a single-stage converter such as a buck converter. However, it is possible to split these two functions into two specialized stages, namely a transformation stage, such as a switching network, and a separate regulation stage, such as a regulating circuit. The transformation stage transforms one voltage into another, while the regulation stage ensures that the voltage and/or current output of the transformation stage maintains desired characteristics.
In those cases where the transformation stage and the regulating stage are close together, a direct connection is possible. However, in other cases, the regulating stage may be far from the transformation stage. Under these circumstances, it is useful to filter the output of the transformation stage to reduce loss.
In one aspect, the invention includes an apparatus having phase and stack switches for operating a switched-capacitor converter. The phase and stack switches are on respective first and second dies.
Some embodiments include a first controller that controls the switches on the first die and a second controller that controls switches on the second die. An inter-controller commissure provides a link between the first and second controllers to permit operation of the first switches to depend at least in part on operation of the second switches, and to permit operation of the second switches to depend at least in part on operation of the first switches. Among these are embodiments in which the first controller is on the first die, the second controller is on the second die, and the inter-controller commissure extends between the first die and the second die. Also among the embodiments are those that include a third die and a fourth die. In these embodiments, the first controller is on the third die, the second controller is on the fourth die, and the inter-controller commissure extends between the third die and the fourth die.
In some embodiments, the switched-capacitor converter is a two-phase converter. Some of these embodiments have third and fourth dies. The stack switches comprise first and second sets, each of which is associated with one of the two phases. The first set of stack switches is on the second die and the second set of stack switches is on the fourth die. Meanwhile, the phase switches comprise first and second sets of phase switches, each of which is associated with one of the two phases. The first set of phase switches is on the first die and the second set of phase switches is on the third die.
Also among the embodiments are those that include charge-transfer capacitors connected to the stack switches and to the phase switches. Among these are embodiments having a third die in which the charge-transfer capacitors are integrated. Also among these are embodiments in which the charge-transfer capacitors are discrete capacitors that connect to the first and second dies. In some of these embodiments, the first die and the second die are connected via an inter-die commissure having a length that corresponds to a distance between positive and negative terminals of the charge-transfer capacitors. Also among the embodiments are those that have an interdie commissure connecting the first and second dies, wherein the first and second dies have first terminals for connection to positive terminals of the charge-transfer capacitors, and second terminals for connection to negative terminals of the charge-transfer capacitors, with the first and second terminals and the second terminals being disposed on opposite ends of the interdie commissure, and with the charge-transfer capacitors being oriented such that positive terminals thereof lie closer to the first terminals than they do to the second terminals and negative terminals thereof lie closer to the second terminals than to the first terminals. Also among the embodiments are those in which interdie commissure has first and second regions such that, during operation, the first region carries more current than the second region. In these embodiments, the first region is wider than the second region.
In some embodiments, the charge-transfer capacitors have capacitances that are a function of voltage applied across the charge-transfer capacitors. In operation, the charge-transfer capacitors sustain different maximum voltages. The charge-transfer capacitors are selected such that, when at their respective maximum voltages, the charge-transfer capacitors all have the same capacitance.
Some embodiments include an interdie commissure connecting the first and second dies. As a result of a fold in the interdie commissure, the first and second dies lie on different planes. Other embodiments feature coplanar first and second dies.
Embodiments include those in which the switched-capacitor converter is a multi-phase converter, and the apparatus has a third die. In these embodiments, the phase switches comprise a first set of phase switches associated with a first phase and a second set of phase switches associated with a second phase, with the first set being on the first die and the second set on the second die. Among these are embodiments that have first and second sets of charge-transfer capacitors, with the first set of charge-transfer capacitors being connected between the first die and the second die, and the second set of charge-transfer capacitors being connected between the third die and the second die.
Other embodiments include a substrate and charge-transfer capacitors. In these embodiments, the substrate supports the charge-transfer capacitors, the first die, and the second die. Among these are embodiments in which the device faces of the first and second dies face the substrate, and conducting bumps between the device face and the substrate provide electrical communication between the dies and the charge-transfer capacitors. Also among these are embodiments that have a package, with the first and second dies being in the package and oriented so that they are either coplanar or non-coplanar.
Other embodiments include a substrate, a package, a third die, and charge-transfer capacitors. In these embodiments, the charge-transfer capacitors are integrated into the third die, the substrate supports the package, the package includes the first die, the second die, and the third die, and the first, second, and third dies are distributed among different layers of the package. Among these are embodiments in which the package comprises a first layer and a second layer. In these embodiments, the first and second dies are in the first layer and the third die is in the second layer. Also among these are embodiments in which the package comprises a first layer and a second layer. In these embodiments, the first and third dies are in the first layer and the second die is in the second layer. Also among these are embodiments in which the package comprises a first layer, a second layer, and a third layer. In these embodiments, each layer contains at most one die. In some of these embodiments, the second layer is between the first and third layers, and the third die is in the second layer.
Some embodiments include a substrate that supports a package. The package has an upper layer and a lower layer, with the lower layer being closer to the substrate than the upper layer. The lower layer contains a die and the upper layer contains charge-transfer capacitors. The inductor is on the substrate outside the package. Among these are embodiments in which the die's device face faces the substrate. The apparatus further includes first and second interconnect layers, and electrically conducting bumps. The first interconnect layer connects the charge-transfer capacitors to the die, and the second interconnect layer connects the die to the charge-transfer capacitors and to the electrical bumps. The electrical bumps connect the package with the inductor.
Also among these are embodiments in which a device face of the die faces away from the substrate. These embodiments include a heat sink, thermally-conducting bumps, a first interconnect layer, a second interconnect layer, and electrically-conducting bumps. The first interconnect layer connects the charge-transfer capacitors to the die. The second interconnect layer connects the die to the charge-transfer capacitors and to the electrically-conducting bumps. The electrically-conducting bumps connect the package with the inductor. In these embodiments, the heat sink faces the substrate, and the thermally-conducting bumps connect the heat sink to the substrate. These thermally-conducting bumps carry only heat. They are electrically disconnected from the circuit.
Also among these are embodiments in which a device face of the die faces away from the substrate. In these embodiments, a first interconnect layer connects charge-transfer capacitors to the die, and a second interconnect layer connects the die to the charge-transfer capacitors and to electrically conducting pads. The electrically conducting pads connect the package with the inductor. The thermally-conducting pad connects the heat sink, which faces the substrate, to the substrate. This thermally-conducting pad carries only heat. It is electrically isolated from the inductor, the charge-transfer capacitor, and the die.
Other embodiments also include a substrate that supports a package having upper and lower layers, with the lower layer being closer to the substrate that the upper layer. The inductor is in the package. The lower layer contains a die and upper layer contains charge-transfer capacitors are in the upper layer. Among these are embodiments in which the inductor is disposed in the upper layer. Also among these embodiments are those in which conductive traces around an inductor core in the layer form the inductor.
Among the foregoing embodiments are those in which a device face of the chip faces away from the substrate. In these embodiments, thermally-conducting bumps connect a heat sink to the substrate. These thermally-conducting bumps only carry heat. They are electrically isolated from the die, the charge-transfer capacitors, and the inductor.
Yet other embodiments include regulator switches in the first die.
These and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying figures, in which:
Some power converters carry out both regulation and transformation with a limited number of circuit components by commingling these functions into a single stage. As a result, certain components are used both for regulation and transformation. Sometimes the regulation stage is referred to as a regulating circuit and the transformation stage is referred to as a switching network. As used herein, these terms mean the same thing.
In the power converter of
In the particular embodiment shown in
In general, two functional components of a circuit or system are said to be isolated, in a galvanic sense, if no direct conduction path exists between those two components, and yet energy and information can still be communicated between those components. The communication of such energy and information can be carried out in a variety of ways that do not require actual current flow. Examples include communication via waves, whether electromagnetic, mechanical, or sonic. Electromagnetic waves in this context include waves in the visible range, as well as just outside the visible range. Such communication can also be implemented via static or quasi-static electric or magnetic fields, capacitively, inductively, or by mechanical means.
Galvanic isolation is particularly useful for cases in which the two functional components have grounds that are at different potentials. Through galvanic isolation of components, it is possible to essentially foreclose the occurrence of ground loops. It is also possible to reduce the likelihood that current will reach ground through an unintended path, such as through a person's body.
The transformation stage efficiently provides an intermediate voltage VX that differs from the input voltage VIN and that varies over a much smaller range than the input voltage VIN. In practice, the intermediate voltage VX varies during operation if there are changes at either the input or output of the transformation stage. These variations require correction to achieve the desired output voltage VO. It is for this reason that a regulation stage is necessary. As shown in
The architecture shown in
The architecture shown in
In contrast,
In the embodiments shown in
In another embodiment, shown in
In the embodiment shown in
An alternative embodiment, shown in
Based on the aforementioned inputs, the controller 20A provides a first control signal ϕ to control switches in the switched-capacitor element 12A and a second control signal PWM to control switching of the regulating circuit 16A. The first control signal is a two-dimensional vector having first and second complementary phases ϕ,
The controller 20A relies on the clock signal CLK and the intermediate voltage VX to set the period of the second control signal PWM for controlling the regulating circuit 16A. A comparison between the reference voltage VREF and the output voltage VO provides a basis for controlling the output voltage VO.
The controller 20A synchronizes operation of the switching network 12A and the regulating circuit 16A. It does so by synchronizing a ripple on the intermediate voltage VX with the second control signal PWM. Such synchronization relaxes the requirement of running the regulation circuit 16A at a significantly higher frequency than the switching network 12A in an attempt to achieve effective feed-forward control.
The control method described herein also avoids glitches inherent in changing the switching frequency of the switching network 12A. It does so by making use of a regulating circuit 16A that draws discontinuous input current. An example of such a regulating circuit 16A is one that uses a buck converter.
Referring now to
The switched-capacitor section 301 outputs the first control signal ϕ. The complementary first and second phases ϕ,
The switched-capacitor section 301 has an undershoot limiter 36 that receives the input voltage VIN and the intermediate voltage VX. Based on these, the undershoot limiter 36 determines a trigger level VX_L. The trigger level VX_L is shown as a dashed horizontal line superimposed on the sixth trace on
After having generated the trigger level VX_L based on the input voltage VIN and the intermediate voltage VX, the undershoot limiter 36 provides it to a first comparator 35. The first comparator 35 then compares the trigger level VX_L with the intermediate signal VX. Based on the comparison, the first comparator 35 provides a first trigger signal to a first control signal generator 34, which ultimately outputs the first control signal ϕ.
The switched capacitor section 301 thus forms a first feedback loop that manipulates the first control signal ϕ in an effort to control the intermediate voltage VX based on the combination of the intermediate voltage VX and the input voltage VIN.
The first control signal generator 34 does not generate the first control signal ϕ immediately. Instead, the first control signal generator 34 waits for an opportune moment to do so. The occurrence of this opportune moment depends on what the regulator section 302 is doing.
While the switched capacitor section 301 is busy providing the first trigger signal to the first control signal generator 34, the regulator section 302 is also busy generating the second control signal PWM. The regulator section 302 begins this process with a voltage compensator 31 that receives a voltage output VO and a reference voltage VREF. From these, the voltage compensator 31 generates an error voltage VERR.
Some implementations of the voltage compensator 31 include linear voltage-mode control and peak current-mode control. However, other modes are possible. Assuming linear voltage-mode control for the regulation circuit 16A, the voltage compensator 31 compares the output voltage VO of the power converter 10 with a reference voltage VREF and provides an error signal VERR to a second comparator 32. This error signal VERR is shown in
The regulator section 302 thus forms a second feedback loop that manipulates the second control signal PWM in an effort to control the output voltage VO based on the combination of a reference signal VREF and the output voltage VO. However, for reasons discussed in more detail below, the switched capacitor section 301 and the regulator section 302 do not operate independently. Instead, the controller 20A synchronizes their operation.
To provide a basis for such synchronization, the regulator section 302 includes a saw-tooth generator 30. The saw-tooth generator 30 generates the serrated waveform VSAW based on a clock signal CLK and the intermediate voltage VX. This serrated waveform VSAW ultimately provides a way to synchronize the first control signal ϕ and the second control signal PWM.
The second comparator 32 compares the error voltage VERR with the serrated waveform VSAW and outputs a second trigger signal based on this comparison. As shown in
The second control signal generator 33 receives the second trigger signal from the second comparator 32 and uses it as a basis for generating the second control signal PWM.
This second control signal PWM ultimately serves as a gate drive to actually drive the gate of a transistor that implements a main switch 152 in a regulating circuit 16A, details of which are seen in
The particular configuration shown illustrates feed-forward control of the regulation circuit 16A implemented in the saw-tooth generator 30. However, such control could also be implemented in the voltage compensator 31.
The switched-capacitor section 301 implements a hysteretic control system in which a controlled variable, namely the intermediate voltage VX, switches abruptly between two states based upon a hysteresis band. The intermediate voltage VX is a piecewise linear approximation of a serrated waveform.
Synchronization between the regulator section 302 and the switched capacitor section 301 is important to enable the dead-time interval of the switching network 12A to occur when no current is being drawn by the regulating circuit 16A.
In a practical switching network 12A, the first control signal ϕ will actually cycle through three states, not just two. In the first state, the first control signal ϕ opens a first set of switches and closes a second set of switches. In the second state, the first control signal ϕ closes the first set of switches and opens the second set of switches.
A practical difficulty that arises is that switches cannot open and close instantly. Nor can they be guaranteed to operate simultaneously. Thus, the first control signal ϕ cycles through a third state, which lasts for a dead-time interval DT. During this third state, all switches open. This minimizes the unpleasant possibility that a switch in the second set will not have opened by the time the switches in the first set have closed.
Meanwhile, certain regulating circuits 16A, such as buck converters and the like, draw input current discontinuously. In particular, such regulating circuits 16A have short intervals during which they are drawing zero current.
The controller 20A avoids glitches by synchronizing the operation of the switching network 12A and the regulating circuit 16A such that the regulating circuit 16A draws zero current during the dead-time interval DT.
A further benefit of such synchronization is the ability to cause switches in the switching network 12A to change state when there is no current flowing through them. This reduces commutation losses. Causing the dead-time interval DT to occur when the regulating circuit 16A is not drawing current, and causing switches in the switching network 12A to only change state at the beginning and the end of the dead-time interval DT thus ensures zero-current switching, as shown in
In operation, the regulator section 302 and the switched capacitor section 301 cooperate to ensure that the length of one cycle of the first control signal ϕ will be equal to an integral number of cycles of the second control signal PWM. In
The first control signal generator 34 receives a first trigger signal from the first comparator 35 indicating that the intermediate voltage VX has fallen below the trigger level VX_L. However, as alluded to above, the first control signal generator 34 does not act immediately. Instead, it waits until there is an opportune time to make a state change. Meanwhile, as the first control signal generator 34 waits, the intermediate voltage VX continues to fall, as shown in
As shown in
Large variations in undershoot ΔVd are undesirable because they stress the regulating circuit 18A. The undershoot limiter 36 selects a suitable trigger level VX_L to limit this undershoot ΔVd by indirectly controlling the undershoot cap ½ΔVX. The undershoot limiter 36 uses the intermediate voltage VX and the input voltage VIN to select an appropriate value of the trigger level VX_L.
During this dead-time interval DT, the phases ϕ,
As is apparent from the above relationship, the dead-time DT places a limit on the maximum possible duty cycle Dmax. It is therefore desirable to reduce the dead-time DT as much as possible to increase the range of possible transformation ratios for the regulating circuit 16A.
For many practical power converters, a desire for electromagnetic compatibility dictates that the regulating circuit 16A should operate at a constant switching frequency. In these cases, the above constraint on the maximum possible duty cycle Dmax is not overly burdensome, especially, if the feed-back controller for the regulation circuit 16A would otherwise have a maximum duty cycle requirement.
The control strategy as described above and implemented by the controller 20A in
For this particular control strategy, the ripple magnitude ΔVX varies as a function of load current. In particular, the ripple magnitude ΔVX defines a serrated waveform having a peak-to-peak amplitude that decreases with load current. As the load current approaches zero, the peak-to-peak amplitude approaches half of the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude. With a few modifications to the controller, it is also possible to get the ΔVX ripple to approach the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude as the load current approaches zero, as shown in
As is apparent from both
The controller 20A shown in
An N-phase controller 20A controls the N-phase converter. The N-phase controller 20A is similar to the single-phase controller in
As shown in
Because the periods of the intermediate voltages VX1, VX2, VX3 are longer than those of the second control signal elements PWM1, PWM2, PWM3, shifting them by the delay time will not cause them to be 120 degrees out of phase with each other. In fact, because their period is so much longer, a shift by this delay time only causes a very small phase shift in the intermediate voltages VX1, VX2, VX3.
A multi-phase controller 20A for controlling the N-phase converter shown in
In
The switching network 12A and the regulating circuit 16A are essentially modular and can be mixed and matched in a variety of different ways. As such, the configuration shown in
For example,
There are two fundamental elements described in connection with the following embodiments: switching networks 12A and regulating circuits 16A. Assuming series connected elements of the same type are combined, there are a total of four basic building blocks. These are shown
The first building block, shown in
Additional embodiments further contemplate the application of object-oriented programming concepts to the design of power converters by enabling switching networks 12A and regulating circuits 16A to be “instantiated” in a variety of different ways so long as their inputs and outputs continue to match in a way that facilitates modular assembly of power converters having various properties.
The switching network 12A in many embodiments is instantiated as a switched-capacitor network. Among the more useful switched capacitor topologies are: Ladder, Dickson, Series-Parallel, Fibonacci, and Doubler, all of which can be adiabatically charged and configured into multi-phase networks. A particularly useful switching capacitor network is an adiabatically charged version of a full-wave cascade multiplier. However, diabatically charged versions can also be used.
As used herein, changing the charge on a capacitor “adiabatically” means causing an amount of charge stored in that capacitor to change by passing the charge through a non-capacitive element. A positive adiabatic change in charge on the capacitor is considered adiabatic charging while a negative adiabatic change in charge on the capacitor is considered adiabatic discharging. Examples of non-capacitive elements include inductors, magnetic elements, resistors, and combinations thereof.
In some cases, a capacitor can be charged adiabatically for part of the time and diabatically for the rest of the time. Such capacitors are considered to be adiabatically charged. Similarly, in some cases, a capacitor can be discharged adiabatically for part of the time and diabatically for the rest of the time. Such capacitors are considered to be adiabatically discharged.
Diabatic charging includes all charging that is not adiabatic and diabatic discharging includes all discharging that is not adiabatic.
As used herein, an “adiabatically charged switching network” is a switching network having at least one capacitor that is both adiabatically charged and adiabatically discharged. A “diabatically charged switching network” is a switching network that is not an adiabatically charged switching network.
The regulating circuit 16A can be instantiated as any converter with the ability to regulate the output voltage. A buck converter for example, is an attractive candidate due to its high efficiency and speed. Other suitable regulating circuits 16A include boost converters, buck/boost converters, fly-back converters, forward converters, half-bridge converters, full-bridge converters, Cuk converters, resonant converters, and linear regulators. The fly-back converter can more specifically be a quasi-resonant fly-back converter, or an active-clamp fly-back converter, or an interleaved fly-back converter, or a two-switch fly-back converter. Likewise, the forward converter can be more specifically a multi-resonant forward converter, or an active-clamp forward converter, or an interleaved forward converter, or a two-switch forward converter. And, the half-bridge converter can more specifically be an asymmetric half-bridge converter, or a multi-resonant half-bridge converter, or a LLC resonant half-bridge.
In the embodiment shown in
An embodiment such as that shown in
In another embodiment, shown in
An embodiment such as that shown in
As was discussed in connection with
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the switching network 200 is a bidirectional switching capacitor network such as that shown in
The switching capacitor network in
The particular embodiment shown in
In yet another embodiment, shown in
A switched-capacitor power converter includes a network of switches and capacitors. By cycling the network through different topological states using these switches, one can transfer energy from an input to an output of the switched-capacitor network. Some converters, known as “charge pumps,” can be used to produce high voltages in flash and other reprogrammable memories.
To help understand the loss mechanisms in switched capacitor converters, it is instructive to first analyze the classical capacitor charging problem, as depicted in
The energy loss incurred while charging the capacitor can be found by calculating the energy dissipated by resistor R, which is
Eloss(t)=∫t=0∞iR(t)×vR(t)dt=∫t=0∞[ic(t)]2Rdt.
The equation can be further simplified by substituting the expression for ic (t) into the equation above. Evaluating the integral then yields
Eloss(t)=½[Vin−vc(0)]2C[1−e−2t/RC].
It is apparent therefore that the only term that involves the resistance is in a decaying exponential. Thus, if the transients are allowed to settle (i.e. t→∞), the total energy loss incurred in charging the capacitor is independent of its resistance R. In that case, the amount of energy loss is equal to
Eloss(∞)=½CΔvc2.
A switched-capacitor converter can be modeled as an ideal transformer, as shown in
It should be noted that the transformer shown is only for modeling purpose. A converter of this type would generally not have windings wrapped around an iron core. The power losses associated with charging and discharging are typically dissipated in the ON resistance of the MOSFETs and equivalent series resistance of the capacitors.
The output voltage of the switched-capacitor converter is given by
There are two limiting cases where the operation of switched capacitor converters can be simplified and Ro easily found. These are referred to as the “slow-switching limit” and the “fast-switching limit.”
In the fast-switching limit (τ>>Tsw), the charging and discharging currents are approximately constant, resulting in a triangular AC ripple on the capacitors. Hence, Ro is sensitive to the series resistance of the MOSFETs and capacitors, but is not a function of the operating frequency. In this case, Ro of the converter operating in the fast-switching limit is a function of parasitic resistance and Ro is given by:
Although it tends to under-estimate Ro, a useful approximation for Ro that serves as a good starting point in the design process is given by
Ro(f)≈√{square root over (RFSL2+RSSL2)}.
In the slow-switching limit, the switching period Tsw is much longer than the RC time constant τ of the energy transfer capacitors. Under this condition, a systemic energy loss given by ½C×ΔVc2 occurs regardless of the resistances of the capacitors and switches. This systemic energy loss arises in part because the root mean square (RMS) of the charging and discharging current is a function of the RC time constant. Under these circumstances, Ro is given by
The behavior of output resistance as a function of frequency can be appreciated by inspection of
The calculations for RSSL and RFSL given above are based on the charge multiplier vector concept. The vector a1 through an can be obtained by inspection for any standard well posed n-phase converter. The charge multiplier vectors are computed using constraints imposed by Kirchoff's current law in each topological state along with the steady-state constraint that the n charge multiplier quantities must sum to zero on each capacitor.
Once Ro is known, the conduction loss Pcond can be calculated by
Pcond=Io2Ro.
Additionally, other losses such as switching losses, driver losses, and control losses can be calculated. Preferably, the switching loss is comparable to conduction loss. These losses, which originate from charging and discharging the transistor nodes, are given by
Psw=Wswfsw=(Wds+Won+Wg)fsw
where Wg is the gate capacitance loss, Won is the overlap or commutation loss, and Wds is the output capacitance loss. Thus, the total converter loss can be calculated using
Ploss=Io2Ro+Wswfsw+Petc.
Once Ro and the additional loss mechanisms have been determined, the total efficiency of the converter is given by
To optimize efficiency of the switched-capacitor converter, the optimal switching frequency, capacitance, and device sizes must be selected. If the switching frequency is too low, then the conduction losses, Pcond, dominate. On the other hand, if the switching frequency is too high, then Psw dominates. Although doing so tends to decrease output ripple, rarely will a switched-capacitor converter operate far above the transitional region between the slow switching limit and fast switching limit. After all, operating above this region tends to increase switching losses without lowering the output resistance to compensate for those increases switching losses. Thus, there is little to gain by operating above that region.
If the effective resistance Reff of the charging path is reduced, for example by reducing the RC time constant, the RMS current increases and it so happens that the total charging energy loss (Eloss=IRMS2Reff=½C×ΔVC2) is independent of Reff One solution to minimize this energy loss is to increase the size of the pump capacitors in the switched capacitor network.
Although many switched-capacitor networks can provide a specific voltage transformation, most of them are impractical for a variety of reasons. A practical switched-capacitor network typically has a large transformation ratio, low switch stress, low DC capacitor voltage, and low output resistance. Suitable topologies for the converters described herein include Ladder, Dickson, Series-Parallel, Fibonacci, and Doubler topologies.
One useful converter is a series-parallel switched capacitor converter.
Another useful topology is that shown in
It takes n clock cycles for the initial charge to reach the output. The charge on the final pump capacitor is n times larger than the charge on the initial pump capacitor. Thus, V2 for the converters in
Although the foregoing topologies are suitable for stepping up voltage, they can also be used to step down voltage by switching the location of the source and the load. In such cases, the diodes can be replaced with controlled switches such as MOSFETs and BJTs.
It is possible to convert the topologies shown in
In the topologies shown thus far, there are two chains of switches, each of which is pumped. However, it is also possible to pump only one of the two switch chains. Such topologies are referred to as “asymmetric.”
In asymmetric topologies, half of the capacitors are used to support a DC voltage and not to transfer energy. However, these embodiments do not require that each switch endure such a high peak voltage. In particular, the peak voltage in the case in which only one switch chain is being pumped is only half of what it would be if both switch chains were actually being pumped. In these asymmetric topologies, the sole switch chain that is being used to transfer energy can be modified to transfer charge during both phases of the clock signal using principles set forth in connection with
The basic building blocks in the modular architecture shown
In general, it is desirable for the regulating circuit to operate in a way that limits the root mean square (RMS) current through the capacitors in the switching network. The regulating circuit can do so using either resistive elements or magnetic storage elements. Because resistive elements consume power, magnetic storage elements are generally preferable for this purpose. Therefore, embodiments described herein rely on a combination of switches and a magnetic storage element in the regulating circuit to limit RMS current in the switching network.
To limit RMS current, the regulating circuit forces the capacitor current through the magnetic storage element in a regulating circuit that has an average DC current. The switches in the regulating circuit then operate to maintain an average DC current through the magnetic storage element.
The regulating circuit may limit both the RMS charging current and the RMS discharging current of at least one capacitor in the switching network. A single regulating circuit may limit the current into or out of the switching network by sinking and/or sourcing current. Therefore, there are four fundamental configurations, which are shown in
Assuming power flows from source to load then, in
In
In
In
A fundamental difficulty that afflicts switched-capacitor networks is that the mere act of charging a capacitor incurs energy loss. This energy loss depends a great deal on how much the voltage across the capacitor changes as a result of the charging event. The energy loss EL associated with using a fixed voltage source at a voltage V to charge a capacitance C from zero to V is ½CV2. This loss does not depend on the parasitic series resistance R. Since this loss arises whenever voltage changes, every charging interval during operation incurs a loss equal to ½CΔV2, where ΔV corresponds to the difference between the initial and final value of the capacitor voltage.
The fixed charge-up loss cannot be reduced by employing switches with lower on-state resistance. Known ways to reduce it simply avoid causing the voltage to change very much during operation. This is why such converters operate most efficiently only at certain conversion ratios.
Since the amount of charge transferred into or out of a charging cycle is the product of the voltage difference and the capacitance, one way to transfer a great deal of charge with only a small voltage difference is to make the capacitance very large. However, large capacitors are not without disadvantages. For one thing, a large capacitance consumes a great deal of physical area. Additionally, switched-capacitor networks with large capacitances are not so amenable to efficient operation.
A converter as described herein overcomes the foregoing disadvantage by providing more efficient use of the capacitors. This means that capacitors can be made smaller and/or that there will be an overall improvement in system efficiency. Although a converter as described herein does not require a reconfigurable switched-capacitor circuit, it may nevertheless take advantage of one as described above.
In the system shown in
The embodiment shown in
The regulating circuit 16A includes a filter capacitor CX that serves only as a filter and bypass for the regulating circuit 16A. Consequently, the capacitance of the filter capacitor CX should be much smaller than that of the first and second pump capacitors C1 and C2 of the switching network 12A.
The switching network 12A alternates between being in a charging state and a discharging state. During the charging state, it charges the first and second pump capacitors C1, C2. Then, during the discharging state, it discharges the first and second pump capacitors C1, C2 in parallel.
In the charging state, the first switches 1 close and the second switches 2 open. The difference between the input voltage VIN, and the sum of the voltages across the first and second pump capacitors C1, C2 appears across the input terminal of the regulating circuit 16A. As a result, the first and second pump capacitors C1, C2 charge with low loss, and at a rate determined by the power drawn from the regulating circuit 16A to control the system output.
Similarly, in the discharging state, the second switches 2 close and the first switches 1 open. The switching network 12A then discharge in parallel at a rate based on the power needed to regulate the output.
Another embodiment relies on at least partially adiabatically charging full-wave cascade multipliers. Cascade multipliers are a preferred switching network because of their superior fast-switching limit impedance, ease of scaling up in voltage, their two-phase operation, and low switch stress.
In cascade multipliers, the coupling capacitors are typically pumped with a clocked voltage source vclk &
With all else being equal, an adiabatically charged switched-capacitor converter can operate at a much lower switching frequency than a conventionally charged switched-capacitor converter, but at higher efficiency. Conversely, an adiabatically charged switched-capacitor converter can operate at the same frequency and with the same efficiency as a conventionally charged switched-capacitor converter, but with much smaller coupling capacitors, for example between four and ten times smaller.
Embodiments described herein can operate with two clocked current sources iclk,
In the embodiment shown in
By correctly choosing the inductance and capacitance (not shown) in
In
Accordingly, when choosing the inductance of L in
In operation, closing switches labeled “1” charges capacitors C4, C5, and C6 while discharging capacitors C1, C2, and C3. Similarly, closing switches “2” has the complementary effect. The first topological state (phase A) is shown in
In this embodiment, the regulating circuit 16A limits the RMS charge and discharging current of each capacitor. For example, capacitor C3 is discharged through the filter inductor in the regulating circuit 16A during phase A, while capacitor C3 is charged through the filter inductor in regulating circuit 16A during phase B, clearly demonstrating the adiabatic concept. Furthermore, all of the active components are implemented with switches so that the converter can process power in both directions.
A few representative node voltages and currents are shown in
In operation, different amounts of current will flow through different switches. It is therefore useful to size the switches in a manner appropriate to the currents that will be flowing through them. For example, the switches connected to VP1 and VP2 carry more current then the other switches in
The switches shown in
Unfortunately, by using the resistance of the switches to constrain the RMS current, conductive power losses increase and the overall efficiency decreases. The regulating circuit 16A, however, allows us to reduce the resistance of the switches and operate adiabatically. Therefore, the switches can be optimally sized for the highest efficiency without worrying about constraining the RMS current since it is handled by the regulating circuit 16A (or optionally a magnetic filter). The optimal size for each switch is chosen by balancing the resistive and capacitive losses in each switch at a given switching frequency and at a given current.
The modular architecture with the basic building blocks shown in
In many switched-capacitor converters, the number of capacitors and switches increases linearly with the transformation ratio. Thus, a large number of capacitors and switches are required if the transformation ratio is large. Alternatively, a large transformation ratio can be achieved by connecting numerous low gain stages in series, either without intervening filters, as depicted in
The main disadvantage of the series stacked configuration is that the voltage stresses on the front stages are much higher than those of the rear stages. This will normally require stages with different voltage ratings and sizes. However, the transformation ratio can be easily changed by bypassing a stage or two.
Adiabatic charging of a preceding series-connected switching network only occurs if the following switching network controls the charging and discharging current of the preceding stage. Thus, it is preferable to use full-wave switched-capacitor converters in the front stages or to use switched-capacitor stages such as the single-phase series-parallel switched-capacitor converters with magnetic based filters.
The power converter provides a total step-down of 32:1, assuming the regulating circuit 16A is a buck converter with a nominal step-down ratio of 2:1. Furthermore, if the input voltage is 32 V and the output voltage is 1 V, then the switches in the first switching network 12A will need to block 8 volts while the switches in the second switching network 12D will need to block 2 volts.
The modular architecture with the basic building blocks shown in
One of the main attributes of switched-capacitor converters is their ability to operate efficiency over a large input range by reconfiguring the switched-capacitor network. If the AC wall voltage (i.e. 60 Hz & 120 VRMS) can be thought of as a slow-moving DC voltage, then a front-end AC switching network 13A should be able to unfold the time-varying input voltage into a relatively stable DC voltage.
Once the AC switching network 13A has unfolded the AC voltage, a regulating circuit 16A, shown in
In addition to the inverting function provided by switches 7 and 8, switches 1A-1E and switches 2A-2E may be selectively opened and closed as shown in Table 1 to provide three distinct conversion ratios of: 1/3, 1/2, and 1.
The AC switching network 13A is provided with a digital clock signal CLK. A second signal CLKB is also generated, which may simply be the complement of CLK (i.e. is high when CLK is low and low when CLK is high), or which may be generated as a non-overlapping complement. With a switching pattern set in accordance with the first row of Table 1, the AC switching network 13A provides a step-down ratio of one-third (⅓). With a switching pattern set in accordance with the second row of Table 1, the AC switching network 13A provides a step-down ratio of one-half (½). With a switching pattern set in accordance with the third row of Table 1, the AC switching network 13A provides a step-down ratio of one.
Most power supplies attached to the wall meet some power factor specification. Power factor is a dimensionless number between 0 and 1 that defines a ratio of the real power flowing to apparent power. A common way to control the harmonic current and thus boost the power factor is by using an active power factor corrector.
The illustrated power converter 10 includes a regulating circuit 16A, a switching network 12A, and an isolated controller 60. As used herein, a circuit having an input and an output is considered isolated if the input voltage and the output voltage do not share a common ground. Such isolation can be carried out by having the input voltage correspond to an input voltage of a transformer and having the output voltage corresponds to an output voltage of a transformer. In some embodiments, the regulating circuit 16A is isolated. In other embodiments, it is the switching network 12A that is isolated. Although only one of the foregoing is needed to consider the modular DC-DC converter 10 as a whole isolated, there are also embodiments in which both the switching network 12A and the regulating circuit 16A are isolated.
In some embodiments, the switching network 12A is an unregulated switched-capacitor converter having a fixed voltage-conversion ratio. These embodiments generally include a regulating circuit 16A to regulate the output of the switching network 12A. Examples of a suitable regulating circuit 16A include a boost converter, a buck converter, a fly-back converter, and a linear regulator.
As shown in
The embodiment shown in
Similarly, the embodiment shown in
The first electromagnetic interference filter 70A, implementations of which can be seen in
The AC bridge 80 accepts an AC voltage and outputs an average DC voltage. A particular implementation of an AC bridge 80 is shown in
Many modern devices require different voltages to operate different components, such as power management integrated circuits (PMICs) in cell phones. For example, one voltage may be required to operate a processor, whereas another voltage may be needed to operate a display. In principle, one could have a separate transformation stage and regulation stage corresponding to each required output voltage. However, this solution is wasteful both of physical space and of pin count. A solution to this difficulty is that shown in
To ensure adiabatic charging of the switched-capacitor network in the transformation stage, it is preferable that the majority of the power drawn by the various regulation stages come by way of a constant current (or constrained current). This can be achieved, for example, by synchronizing the regulation stages so that they draw as constant a current as possible, thus avoiding larger resistive losses (i.e., due to higher RMS current) in the switched-capacitor network of the transformation stage.
In operation, switches labeled “1” and “2” are always in complementary states. Thus, in a first switched-state, all switches labeled “1” are open and all switches labeled “2” are closed. In a second switched-state, all switches labeled “1” are closed and all switches labeled “2” are opened. Similarly, switches labeled “3” are “4” are in complementary states, switches labeled “5” are “6” are in complementary states, and switches labeled “7” are “8” are in complementary states. Typically, the regulating circuits operate at higher switching frequencies than the switching networks. However, there is no requirement on the switching frequencies between and amongst the switching networks and regulating circuits.
It should be understood that the topology of the regulating circuit can be any type of power converter with the ability to regulate the output voltage, including, but without limitation, synchronous buck, three-level synchronous buck, sepic, soft switched or resonant converters. Similarly, the switching networks can be realized with a variety of switched-capacitor topologies, depending on desired voltage transformation and permitted switch voltage.
The physical implementation of the foregoing switching networks 12A includes four primary components: passive device layers, active device layers, interconnect structures, and thru-vias. The passive device layers have passive devices, such as capacitors. The active device layers have active devices, such as switches.
The separation of active and passive devices in different layers arises because active devices are made by CMOS processing. Thus, if one has passive devices on the same layer, they must be made by CMOS-compatible processing steps to avoid destroying the active devices. This constraint makes it difficult to manufacture capacitors that provide high capacitance in a small area of the chip. It also makes it difficult to make high Q inductors. To avoid these difficulties, it is preferable to produce integrated passive devices on their own wafer with a process flow that is optimized for producing such passive devices.
In some embodiments, the devices are integrated into a single monolithic substrate. In other embodiments, the devices are integrated into multiple monolithic substrates. The monolithic substrates are typically made of semiconductor material, such as silicon.
In a preferred practice, one makes passive devices on a passive device layer using an integrated passive device process and makes active devices on an active device layer using a CMOS process. These device layers are electrically connected together through a fine interconnect structure that includes thru-vias to allow electrical connections across device layers.
The layers within the stack of layers in
In
In
The C4 bumps are laid out along the printed-circuit board at a first pitch. An interconnect structure includes C5 bumps laid out at a second pitch that is smaller than the first pitch. An example of such C5 bumps can be seen in
Each passive layer has capacitors that occupy a certain footprint on the chip. The capacitors are located such that each one is within a footprint of a switch on an active layer that is above or below the passive layer. Such an arrangement helps reduce energy loss and other parasitic losses in the interconnect structures.
Additional permutations arise because, as a result of the nature of known semiconductor fabrication processes, it is common to process only one face of a wafer. This face of the wafer has devices integrated into it. For this reason, it is called the “device face.”
For each stack configuration, there are now additional permutations concerning whether the device face is an upper face or a lower face. For a given layer, with reference to the z-axis shown in
As used herein, a layer is said to “face” the +z direction if a vector that is perpendicular to a plane defined by that layer and that is directed in a direction away from that layer is directed in the +z direction. A layer is said to face in the −z direction if it does not face the +z direction.
For the case in which there are only two device layers,
In
Naturally, certain configurations are preferable to others. The choice will depend upon numerous factors, most of which relate to thru-via technology and the number of pins that are available to connect the layers to external circuitry.
The passive device layer and active device layer can be in any form when attached. Two common choices would be in die or wafer form.
Although any kind of capacitor can be used, trench capacitors are preferable to planar capacitors because trench capacitors offer greater capacitance per unit of die area than planar capacitors, sometimes by one or two orders of magnitude. Additionally, trench capacitors offer lower equivalent series resistance than planar capacitors. Both of these capacitor attributes are desirable for use in power converters that use capacitive energy transfer because they affect the efficiency of the power converter.
As shown in
A switched-capacitor power converter of the type discussed herein has a great many switches and capacitors in a switched-capacitor power converter. These all have to be interconnected correctly for the power converter to operate. There are many ways to physically lay out the conducting paths that interconnect these components. However, not all of these ways are equally efficient. Depending on their geometry, some of these conducting paths may introduce noticeable parasitic resistance and/or inductance. Because there are so many interconnections, it can be a daunting challenge to choose a set of interconnections that will both provide acceptable parasitic resistance and inductance for the power converter as a whole.
One method that can be used to control these parasitic quantities is to partition the switches and capacitors.
One way to reduce such parasitic quantities is to choose the shape and locations of the switches on the active layer so that they fit beneath the capacitors on the passive layer. This avoids forcing current to undertake a long journey along the faces of the layers as it travels between a switch and a capacitor. An example of this technique is shown in
Another way to reduce such parasitic quantities arises from recognizing that switches in a switching network 12A are usually active devices that are implemented with transistors. The switching network 12A may be integrated on a single monolithic semiconductor substrate or on multiple monolithic semiconductor substrates, or formed using discrete devices. Furthermore, since the device is a power converter, each switch may be expected to carry a large amount of current. A switch that carries a great deal of current is often implemented by numerous current paths connected in parallel to a common terminal.
In a switch as described above, the current paths that make up the switch are physically located side-by-side and thus occupy a space having a non-zero width. These current paths all connect to a terminal that is itself connected to a conducting path. An example of this configuration is shown in
Some current entering the source terminal shown in
Similarly, the lower layer of
One way to reduce this lateral current is to partition the switches and the capacitors into numerous partitions, as shown in
The difference between
The three current paths shown collectively represent a switch on an active layer that is formed by various doping profiles along a piece of silicon to provide charge carriers and then connecting those three lines to a pair of external terminals, as shown in
The capacitor represented by the lower layer of
Similarly, the transistor switch represented by the upper layer of
It should be apparent that the act of partitioning is geometry-independent. Its essence is that of turning an n-terminal device into an (n+m) terminal device in an effort to reduce parasitic effects. There is no requirement that the device be oriented in any particular way. In particular, there is no requirement that the partitioning be carried out in only one dimension as shown in
Both the techniques shown in
Depending upon the type of capacitor, each charge-transfer capacitor may have a capacitance that is a function of the voltage across it. The charge-transfer capacitors are selected so that they all have the same capacitance at their respective operating voltages. However, at the same voltage, it may well be that the different charge-transfer capacitors will have different capacitances (e.g., MLCC have a strong capacitance dependence upon dc voltage bias).
The switching network 12A includes first and second phase-switch sets 54A, 54B, one for each phase. The switches within each phase-switch set 54A, 54B will be referred to herein as “phase switches.” Similarly, the switching network 12A includes first and second stack-switch sets 52A, 52B, again, one for each phase. The switches within each stack-switch set 52A, 52B will be referred to herein as “stack switches.”
Each of the switches takes up a certain amount of area on semiconductor substrate (e.g., silicon, GaAs, GaN, and SiC). The areas taken up by each switch need not be the same, however. In general, it is useful to have switches that are expected to carry considerable amounts of current be larger than those that carry less current. This permits the overall circuit to be smaller, while avoiding excessive conductive losses.
One or more of the switches can be partitioned to discourage lateral flow of current within the area defined by the switch. This can be carried out by having multiple terminals on each end of the switch. With such multiple terminals, current entering through any one terminal will be more likely to flow to a terminal directly opposite, thus reducing the extent of lateral current flow within the switch.
To control operation of the phase switches and the stack switches, the switching network 12A features two separate and distinct controllers: a phase controller 59A to control the phase switches and a stack controller 51 to control the stack switches.
The phase controller 59A controls the phase switches based at least in part on a phase-controller input signal IO1. It does so through a phase control path 55B that connects the phase controller 59A to the phase switches. Meanwhile, the stack controller 51 controls the stack switches based at least in part on a stack-controller input signal IO2. It does so through a stack control path 55A that connects the stack controller 51 to the stack switches. An inter-controller commissure 57 provides communication between the phase controller 59A and the stack controller 51. This permits the phase controller 59A and the stack controller 51 to control the phase switches and stack switches in a coordinated fashion rather than independently.
An advantage of the manufacturing procedures used in integrated circuits is the ability to integrate many components on a single die. This makes it easier to manufacture many components at once, and to thus reduce the manufacturing cost per component.
One way to manufacture the switching network 12A shown in
Because of their roles in the circuit, the stack switches and the phase switches have different requirements. In particular, the phase switches do not experience such high voltages or currents. As a result, the phase switches are relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture. On the other hand, the stack switches are regularly exposed to fairly high voltage differences across them. Because of these special needs, the stack switches require different manufacturing steps.
The more complex procedure used to manufacture stack switches can be used to also manufacture phase switches. Thus, it is feasible to manufacture the first and second stack-switch sets 52A, 52B and the first and second phase-switch sets 54A, 54B on the same integrated circuit. This offers the advantage of having to carry out only one manufacturing procedure.
The switching network 12A shown in
Specifically,
In some embodiments, one or both of the phase controller 59A and the stack controller 51 are also on separate controller dies, thus further increasing the number of separate manufacturing operations that must be carried out to construct the switching network 12A.
In the embodiment shown in
For example,
In
The first phase-switch set 54A in
The first stack-switch set 52A in
In connecting the various switches to the corresponding charge-transfer capacitors C1A, C2A, C3A, C4A, C1B, C2B, C3B, C4B of the first charge-transfer capacitor set 50A, it is useful to avoid excessive path lengths between the charge-transfer capacitors C1A, C2A, C3A, C4A, C1B, C2B, C3B, C4B and the stack switches S1A, S2A, S3A, S4A, S1B, S2B, S3B, S4B, SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4. Excessive path lengths are undesirable because they increase resistance between components. These path lengths can be reduced by suitably arranging the dies and the locations of the terminals on each die.
As shown in
The embodiment shown in
In the embodiment of
The switching network 12A of
The first phase-controller 59A controls the operation of the phase switches in the first phase-switch set 53A based in part on a first-phase-controller input signal IO1. It does so through a first phase-control path 55B that connects the phase controller 59A to the phase switches. The second phase-controller 59B controls the operation of the phase switches in the second phase-switch set 53B based at least in part on a second-phase-controller input signal IO3. It does so through a second phase-control path 55C that connects the second phase controller 59B to the second phase-switch set 53B.
The stack controller 51 receives a stack-control input signal IO2 and uses that to control the operation of the stack switches in the first and second stack-switch sets 52A, 52B. It does so via a stack control path 55A. The first phase-controller 59A, the second phase-controller 59B, and the stack controller 51 all communicate via an inter-controller commissure 57.
In this embodiment, the first phase-switch set 54A and the first stack-die are associated with the first phase, and the second phase-switch set 54B and the second stack-switch set 52B are associated with the second phase. The first and second phase-controllers 59A, 59B and the stack controller 51 have been omitted to promote clarity. The switches are also shown schematically instead of as transistors.
The circuit shown in
The first phase-switch set 53A in
The first stack-switch 52A in
The terminals on the second phase-die 58B are laid out in a manner similar to that shown for the first phase-die 58A and have thus been omitted for clarity. Similarly, the interconnections between the charge-transfer capacitors C1A, C2A, C3A, C4A and both the stack-die 56 and the first phase-die 58A are similar to those shown in
Referring back to
In many cases, the switching network 12A is to be connected to a regulator (also known as regulating circuit). Under these circumstances, it is useful to include a regulator-switch set 65 within the phase-die 58C as shown in
The regulator that is to be coupled to the regulator-switch set 65 introduces an inductive load, which in turn introduces considerable noise in the substrate of any die that contains the regulator-switch set 65. Since, during operation, the substrate of the phase-die 58C is inherently noisier than the substrate of the stack-die 56, it is advantageous to include the regulator-switch set 65 in the phase-die 58C so that operation of the stack-die 56 can proceed with minimal disturbance due to electrical noise.
In the embodiment shown in
An advantage of placing the phase switches and stack switches on separate dies instead of integrating them into the same die is that doing so reduces the area of the die that holds the stack switches. Since this die must undergo a more expensive manufacturing process, and since the manufacturing cost is a function of die area, it is advantageous to reduce the die area. Since only the stack switches actually require the more expensive manufacturing process, it is advantageous to omit the phase switches and to place them on a separate die, which can then be manufactured more inexpensively.
Another advantage that arises is that having stack switches and phase switches on separate dies provides more flexibility in routing between components. This is because when all the components are on the same die, the components and the interconnections are confined to a two-dimensional space. In contrast, when a third dimension becomes available, there is an extra degree of freedom that can be used to optimize placement of the dies relative to each other to minimize path lengths.
Yet another advantage of having the various components of a switched-capacitor circuit be on separate dies is that doing so can promote heat dissipation. This is because there will be more surface area available to radiate heat. The ability to efficiently dissipate heat is particularly important for a power converter, since a power converter has a tendency to run hot. An example of how to arrange dies to promote cooling is shown in
An advantage of the embodiment shown in
Another advantage of using different dies to build a switching network 12A is that come components are not good neighbors on the same die.
Since all components on a die share a common substrate, all components are inherently coupled. This means that activity at one end of the die may significantly affect activity at the other end of the die.
The stack switches handle considerable amounts of power. As a result, the stack switches do not always make good neighbors on the same die. In particular, when the stack switches and phase switches are on the same die, the phase switch operation can be adversely affected by stack switch operation.
In some embodiments, the stack controller 51 is integrated into the stack-die. This reduces overall pin count and also avoids the need to fabricate a separate die. However, the very high currents associated with the operation of the stack switches may interfere with operation of the stack controller 51, both because of EMI and because of electrical coupling. Thus, in some embodiments, the stack controller 51 is on a separate die.
Among other advantages, the arrangements described above avoid the component and pin count penalty, reduce the energy loss in the parasitic interconnect structures, and reduces the total footprint of power converters that use capacitors to transfer energy.
In some implementations, a computer accessible storage medium includes a database representative of one or more components of the converter. For example, the database may include data representative of a switching network that has been optimized to promote low-loss operation of a charge pump.
Generally speaking, a computer accessible storage medium may include any non-transitory storage media accessible by a computer during use to provide instructions and/or data to the computer. For example, a computer accessible storage medium may include storage media such as magnetic or optical disks and semiconductor memories.
Generally, a database representative of the system may be a database or other data structure that can be read by a program and used, directly or indirectly, to fabricate the hardware comprising the system. For example, the database may be a behavioral-level description or register-transfer level (RTL) description of the hardware functionality in a high level design language (HDL) such as Verilog or VHDL. The description may be read by a synthesis tool that may synthesize the description to produce a netlist comprising a list of gates from a synthesis library. The netlist comprises a set of gates that also represent the functionality of the hardware comprising the system. The netlist may then be placed and routed to produce a data set describing geometric shapes to be applied to masks. The masks may then be used in various semiconductor fabrication steps to produce a semiconductor circuit or circuits corresponding to the system. In other examples, Alternatively, the database may itself be the netlist (with or without the synthesis library) or the data set.
Having described one or more preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating these circuits, techniques and concepts may be used. Accordingly, it is submitted that the scope of the patent should not be limited to the described embodiments, but rather, should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Under 35 USC 120, this application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/590,562, filed May 9, 2017, which under 35 USC 119, claims the benefit of the priority date of U.S. Provisional Application 62/333,432, filed on May 9, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Application 62/333,402, filed on May 9, 2016, and under 35 USC 120, this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/138,692, filed on Apr. 26, 2016, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/513,747, filed on Oct. 14, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/771,904, filed on Feb. 20, 2013 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,860,396 on Oct. 14, 2014, which is a continuation of international application PCT/US2012/036455, filed on May 4, 2012, which, under 35 USC 119, claims the benefit of the priority dates of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/482,838, filed May 5, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/548,360, filed Oct. 18, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/577,271, filed Dec. 19, 2011, the contents of which are all incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3370215 | Light | Feb 1968 | A |
3745437 | Brown | Jul 1973 | A |
3818306 | Marini | Jun 1974 | A |
3818360 | Boutmy | Jun 1974 | A |
4214174 | Dickson | Jul 1980 | A |
4408268 | Peters | Oct 1983 | A |
4513364 | Nilssen | Apr 1985 | A |
4812961 | Essaff et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4903181 | Seidel | Feb 1990 | A |
5006782 | Pelly | Apr 1991 | A |
5057986 | Henze | Oct 1991 | A |
5119283 | Steigerwald | Jun 1992 | A |
5132606 | Herbert | Jul 1992 | A |
5159539 | Koyama | Oct 1992 | A |
5198970 | Kawabata | Mar 1993 | A |
5268832 | Kandatsu | Dec 1993 | A |
5301097 | McDaniel | Apr 1994 | A |
5331303 | Shiota | Jul 1994 | A |
5345376 | Nourbakhsh | Sep 1994 | A |
5402329 | Wittenbreder, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5548206 | Soo | Aug 1996 | A |
5557193 | Kajimoto | Sep 1996 | A |
5661348 | Brown | Aug 1997 | A |
5717581 | Canclini | Feb 1998 | A |
5737201 | Meynard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761058 | Kanda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793626 | Jiang | Aug 1998 | A |
5801987 | Dinh | Sep 1998 | A |
5812017 | Golla et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831846 | Jiang | Nov 1998 | A |
5892395 | Stengel | Apr 1999 | A |
5907484 | Kowshik et al. | May 1999 | A |
5956243 | Mao | Sep 1999 | A |
5959565 | Taniuchi | Sep 1999 | A |
5959585 | Miltz | Sep 1999 | A |
5978283 | Hsu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982645 | Levran | Nov 1999 | A |
6107864 | Fukushima et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6133788 | Dent | Oct 2000 | A |
6140807 | Vannatta | Oct 2000 | A |
6154380 | Assow | Nov 2000 | A |
6157253 | Sigmon | Dec 2000 | A |
6178102 | Stanley | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198645 | Kotowski | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6255906 | Eidson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275018 | Telefus | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327462 | Loke | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339538 | Handleman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377117 | Oskowsky | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6396341 | Pehlke | May 2002 | B1 |
6400579 | Cuk | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6429632 | Forbes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476666 | Palusa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486728 | Kleveland | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501325 | Meng | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504422 | Rader et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507503 | Norrga | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515612 | Abel | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6563235 | Mcintyre | May 2003 | B1 |
6650552 | Takagi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657876 | Satoh | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700803 | Krein | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738277 | Odell | May 2004 | B2 |
6738432 | Pehlke | May 2004 | B2 |
6759766 | Hiratsuka et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6791298 | Shenal | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798177 | Liu | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6927441 | Pappalardo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934167 | Jang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980181 | Sudo | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995995 | Zeng | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7071660 | Ming | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072195 | Xu | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091778 | Gan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103114 | Lapierre | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7135847 | Taurand | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145382 | Ker et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157956 | Wei | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161816 | Shteynberg | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190210 | Azrai et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224062 | Hsu | May 2007 | B2 |
7236542 | Matero | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239194 | Azrai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250810 | Tsen | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259974 | Donaldson | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269036 | Deng | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7330070 | Vaisanen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7362251 | Jensen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375992 | Mok | May 2008 | B2 |
7382113 | Wai | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7382634 | Buchmann | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408330 | Zhao | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443705 | Ito | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7511978 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521914 | Dickerson | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535133 | Perreault | May 2009 | B2 |
7589605 | Perreault | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595682 | Lin et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7616467 | Mallwitz | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633778 | Mok | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7696735 | Oraw | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705681 | Ilkov | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724551 | Yanagida et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7768800 | Mazumduer | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777459 | Williams | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782027 | Williams | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786712 | Williams | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807499 | Nishizawa | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7812579 | Williams | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7889519 | Perreault | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7907429 | Ramadass | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907430 | Kularatna et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928705 | Hooijschuur et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7940038 | Silva | May 2011 | B2 |
7956572 | Zane | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7977921 | Bahai et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7999601 | Schlueter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000117 | Petricek | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018216 | Kakehi | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026763 | Dawson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8031003 | Dishop | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040174 | Likhterov | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048766 | Joly et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076915 | Nakazawa | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8085524 | Roozeboom | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8089788 | Jain | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106597 | Mednik et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8111052 | Glovinsky | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8111054 | Yen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130518 | Fishman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159091 | Yeates | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164384 | Dawson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169797 | Coccia | May 2012 | B2 |
8193604 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212541 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8276002 | Dennard | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8330436 | Oraw et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8339184 | Kok et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350549 | Kitabatake | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8384467 | O'Keeffe et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8395914 | Klootwijk et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423800 | Huang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451053 | Nguyen | May 2013 | B2 |
8456874 | Singer et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8503203 | Szczeszynski et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8542169 | Senda | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8582333 | Oraw et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8629666 | Carroll | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643347 | Perreault | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659353 | Dawson | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8670254 | Perreault | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8699248 | Perreault | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718188 | Balteanu | May 2014 | B2 |
8729819 | Zhao | May 2014 | B2 |
8824978 | Briffa | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8829993 | Briffa | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8830709 | Perreault | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8830710 | Perreault | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854019 | Levesque | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8856562 | Huang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8860396 | Giuliano | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8957727 | Dawson | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9048727 | Giuliano | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9209758 | Briffa | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9362826 | Giuliano | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9450506 | Perreault | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9577590 | Levesque | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9634577 | Perreault | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9712051 | Giuliano | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9755672 | Perreault | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9882471 | Giuliano | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10326358 | Giuliano | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10381924 | Giuliano | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10389235 | Giuliano | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10404162 | Giuliano | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10541611 | Giuliano | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10680515 | Giuliano | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10917007 | Giuliano | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10938300 | Giuliano | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20020158660 | Jang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030169096 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227280 | Vinciarelli | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040041620 | D'Angelo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040222775 | Muramatsu | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050007184 | Kamijo | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024125 | McNitt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050088865 | Lopez | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050207133 | Pavier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213267 | Azrai | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050286278 | Perreault | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060139021 | Taurand | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060213890 | Kooken | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226130 | Kooken | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070035977 | Odell | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051712 | Kooken | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066224 | D'Hont | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066250 | Takahashi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069818 | Bhatti | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091655 | Oyama | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123184 | Nesimoglu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146020 | Williams | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146090 | Carey | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159257 | Lee | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171680 | Perreault | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210774 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230221 | Lim et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247222 | Sorrells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247253 | Carey | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070281635 | McCallister | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290747 | Traylor | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291718 | Chan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296383 | Xu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001660 | Rasmussen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003960 | Zolfaghari | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003962 | Ngai | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007333 | Lee | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012637 | Aridas | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013236 | Weng | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019459 | Chen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031023 | Kitagawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055946 | Lesso | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062724 | Feng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080136500 | Frulio | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136991 | Senda | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150621 | Lesso et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157732 | Williams | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157733 | Williams | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158915 | Williams | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080239772 | Oraw | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090033293 | Feb 2009 | A1 | |
20090059630 | Williams | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072800 | Ramadass | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090102439 | Williams | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090147554 | Adest | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196082 | Mazumder | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090257211 | Kontani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273955 | Tseng | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278520 | Perreault | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090302686 | Fishman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303753 | Fu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322304 | Oraw | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323380 | Harrison | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100073084 | Hur | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085786 | Chiu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110741 | Lin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117612 | Klootwijk | May 2010 | A1 |
20100140736 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142239 | Hopper | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201441 | Gustavsson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202161 | Sims et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214746 | Lotfi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244189 | Klootwijk | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244585 | Tan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100291888 | Hadjichristos | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308751 | Nerone | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001542 | Ranta | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110089483 | Reynes | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101884 | Kim | May 2011 | A1 |
20110148518 | Lejon | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163414 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175591 | Cuk | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181128 | Perreault | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120043818 | Stratakos | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064953 | Dagher | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120146177 | Choi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153907 | Carobolante | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170334 | Menegoli | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176195 | Dawson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120243267 | Kassayan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249096 | Enenkel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120252382 | Bashir | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120313602 | Perreault et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326684 | Perreault et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130005286 | Chan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130049714 | Chiu | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049885 | Rozman | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058049 | Roth | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130058141 | Oraw et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094157 | Giuliano | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130106380 | Marsili | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154600 | Giuliano | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130181521 | Khlat | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187612 | Aiura | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130229841 | Giuliano | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241625 | Perreault | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130343106 | Perreault | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343107 | Perreault | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015731 | Khlat | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140118065 | Briffa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118072 | Briffa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140120854 | Briffa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140159681 | Oraw et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140167513 | Chang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225581 | Giuliano | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226378 | Perreault | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140306648 | Le | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140306673 | Le | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313781 | Perreault | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140335805 | Briffa | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140339918 | Perreault | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355322 | Perreault | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022173 | Le | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150023063 | Perreault | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150084701 | Perreault | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097538 | Le | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150102798 | Giuliano | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150155895 | Perreault | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150280553 | Giuliano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150295497 | Perreault | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150357912 | Perreault | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150364991 | Chung | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160093948 | Lehtola | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094126 | Liu | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160111356 | Cho | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160197552 | Giuliano | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160254754 | Perreault | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160322894 | Giuliano | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170237351 | Giuliano | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244318 | Giuliano | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170279374 | Friebe | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170300078 | Puggelli | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302093 | Peterson | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180034363 | Giuliano | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180145587 | Giuliano | May 2018 | A1 |
20180205315 | Giuliano | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190027468 | Giuliano | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190028018 | Datta | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190115830 | Giuliano | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190207513 | Ramadass | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190393777 | Giuliano | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200021187 | Chang | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200036286 | Giuliano | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200083805 | Mauri | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200112247 | Giuliano | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200127557 | Giuliano | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200136494 | Kazama | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200195136 | Huang | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200204172 | Geng | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200246626 | Labbe | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200253520 | Wang | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210013798 | Giuliano | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1132959 | Oct 1996 | CN |
101563845 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101636702 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101647182 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101662208 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101976953 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102055328 | May 2011 | CN |
102769986 | Nov 2012 | CN |
103650313 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103650314 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103975433 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104011985 | Aug 2014 | CN |
105229909 | Jan 2016 | CN |
107580748 | Jan 2018 | CN |
108964442 | Dec 2018 | CN |
109219919 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109478845 | Mar 2019 | CN |
10358299 | Jul 2005 | DE |
112016001188 | Mar 2018 | DE |
112017002374 | Jan 2019 | DE |
0513920 | Nov 1992 | EP |
1199788 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1750366 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2705597 | Aug 2018 | EP |
3425784 | Jan 2019 | EP |
2852748 | Sep 2004 | FR |
2505371 | Feb 2014 | GB |
10327573 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11235053 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000134095 | May 2000 | JP |
2002062858 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-233139 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2010045943 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2018508178 | Mar 2018 | JP |
20110053681 | May 2011 | KR |
20140015528 | Feb 2014 | KR |
20150085072 | Jul 2015 | KR |
101556838 | Oct 2015 | KR |
20180004116 | Jan 2018 | KR |
20180118234 | Oct 2018 | KR |
201644164 | Dec 2016 | TW |
2006093600 | Sep 2006 | WO |
W02007136919 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009112900 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO2012151466 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013059446 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013096416 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013086445 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2014070998 | May 2014 | WO |
2014154390 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014169186 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2014168911 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2014169186 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2016149105 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO2017196826 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
O. Abutbul et al. “Step-Up Switching-Mode Converter With High Voltage Gain Using a Switched-Capacitor Circuit” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I., vol. 50, pp. 1098-1102, Aug. 2003. |
Umeno et al. “A New Approach to Low Ripple-Noise Switching Converters on the Basis of Switched-Capacitor Converters” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1077-1080, Jun. 1991. |
Axelrod et al. “Single-switch single-stage switched-capacitor buck converter”, Proc. of NORPIE 2004, 4th Nordic Workshop on Power and Industrial Electronics, Jun. 2004. |
Sun et al. “High Power Density, High Efficiency System Two-Stage Power Architecture for Laptop Computers”, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 1-7, Jun. 2006. |
R. D. Middlebrook, “Transformerless DC-to-DC Converters with Large Conversion Ratios” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 484-488, Oct. 1988. |
Wood et al, “Design, Fabrication and Initial Results of a 2g Autonomous Glider” IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1870-1877, Nov. 2005. |
T. A. Meynard, H. Foch, “Multi-Level Conversion: High Voltage Choppers and Voltage-Source Inverters,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 397-403, 1992. |
Pilawa-Podgurski et al. “Merged Two-Stage Power Converter Architecture with Soft Charging Switched-Capacitor Energy Transfer” 39th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008. |
Han et al. “A New Approach to Reducing Output Ripple in Switched-Capacitor-Based Step-Down DC-DC Converters” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1548-1555 Nov. 2006. |
Lei et al. “Analysis of Switched-capacitor DC-DC Converters in Soft-charging Operation” 14thIEEE Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics, pp. 1-7, Jun. 23, 2013. |
Ng et al. “Switched Capacitor DC-DC Converter: Superior where the Buck Converter has Dominated” PhD Thesis, UC Berkeley, Aug. 17, 2011. |
R. Pilawa-Podgurski and D. Perreault, “Merged Two-Stage Power Converter with Soft Charging Switched-Capacitor Stage in 180 nm CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1557-1567, Jul. 2012. |
Ottman et al, “Optimized Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Circuit using Step-Down Converter in Discontinuous Conduction Mode”, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 1988-1994, 2002. |
Ma et al, “Design and Optimization of Dynamic Power System for Self-Powered Integrated Wireless Sensing Nodes” ACM ISLPED '05 conference (published at pp. 303-306 of the proceedings). |
Xu et al., “Voltage Divider and its Application in Two-stage Power Architecture,” IEEE Twenty-First Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 499-504, Mar. 2006. |
Markowski, “Performance Limits of Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Converters”, IEEE PESC'95 Conference, 1995. |
Texas Instruments data sheet for part TPS54310, “3-V to 6-V input, 3-A output synchronous-buck PWM switcher with integrated FETs”, dated 2002-2005. |
Linear Technology data sheet for part LTC3402, “2A, 3MHz Micropower Synchronous Boost Converter”, 2000. |
Starzyk et al., “A DC-DC Charge Pump Design Based on Voltage Doublers,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 48, No. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 350-359. |
Andreassen—“Digital Variable Frequency Control for Zero Voltage Switching and Interleaving of Synchronous Buck Converters” 12th Intl. Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, IEEE Aug. 2006, pp. 184-188, 5 pages. |
Cao—“Multiphase Multilevel Modular DC-DC Converter for High-Current High-Gain TEG Application” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 47, No. 3, May/Jun. 1991, pp. 1400-1408, 9 pages. |
Cheng—“New Generation of Switched Capacitor Converters” PESC 98 Record, 29th Annual IEEE Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Wuhan, China, May 17-20, 2009, pp. 1529-1535, 7 pages. |
Giuliano—“Architectures and Topologies for Power Delivery”, Biannual Review of MIT Center for Integrated Circuits; Power Point Presentation, May 9, 2007, 17 slides. |
Luo—“Investigation of Switched-Capacitorized DC/DC Converters” 2009 IEEE 6th Intl. Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Wuhan, China, May 17-20, 2009, pp. 1270-1276, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / U.S. Patent Application filed Feb. 20, 2013, 62 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Corrected Application Papers dated Mar. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Response to Notice to File Corrected Application Papers filed May 20, 2013, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Updated Filing Receipt and Informational Notice dated May 28, 2013, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Notice of Publication dated Sep. 5, 2013, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Nonfinal Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2013, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Amendment filed Mar. 13, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Final Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2014, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Amendment filed May 23, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2014, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Issue Fee Payment and 312 Amendment filed Aug. 29, 2014, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904/ Examiner Response to 312 Amendment dated Sep. 11, 2014, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,904 / Issue Notification dated Sep. 24, 2014, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / U.S. Patent Application filed Oct. 14, 2014, 76 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Corrected Application Papers dated Oct. 22, 2014, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Response to Notice to File Corrected Application Papers with Amendment dated Dec. 22, 2014, 47 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jan. 5, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Notice of Publication dated Apr. 16, 2015, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Petition to Make Special Under Patent Prosecution Highway dated Apr. 22, 2015, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Decision Granting Petition to Make Special Under Patent Prosecution Highway dated Apr. 22, 2015, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2015, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Amendment filed Sep. 17, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Final Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2015, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747/ Amendment filed Jan. 14, 2016, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747/ Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 26, 2016, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747 / Issue Fee Payment filed Apr. 26, 2016, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,747/ Issue Notification dated May 10, 2016, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / U.S. Patent Application filed Apr. 26, 2016, 60 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated May 13, 2016, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts and Amendment dated Jul. 13, 2016, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jul. 13, 2016, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692/ Notice of Publication dated Nov. 3, 2016, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Mar. 10, 2017, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692/ Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 11, 2017, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Issue Fee Payment and 312 Amendment filed Jun. 9, 2017, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Examiner Response to 312 Amendment and Corrected Filing Receipt dated Jun. 21, 2017, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/138,692 / Issue Notification dated Jun. 28, 2017, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / U.S. Patent Application filed Jun. 9, 2017, 63 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Jun. 20, 2017, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts and Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 20, 2017, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Request to Update Name of Applicant filed Oct. 24, 2017, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Oct. 24, 2017, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Corrected Filing Receipt and Acceptance of Power of Attorney dated Oct. 26, 2017, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Notice of Publication dated Feb. 1, 2018, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Request to Update Name of Applicant filed Feb. 23, 2018, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Corrected Filing Receipt dated May 14, 2018, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Feb. 6, 2019, 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Issue Fee Payment dated May 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,481 / Issue Notification dated May 29, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / U.S. Patent Application filed Jun. 18, 2019, 59 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Jun. 26, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts dated Dec. 26, 2019, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Updated Filing dated Dec. 30, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Notice of Publication dated Apr. 9, 2020, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Preliminary Amendment dated May 8, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Supplemental Amendment dated Jul. 29, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Aug. 24, 2020, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Request for Continued Examination filed Sep. 8, 2020, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Sep. 16, 2020, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Oct. 30, 2020, 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Request for Continued Examination and Amendment filed Nov. 23, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Dec. 7, 2020, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Corrected Notice Allowability dated Dec. 28, 2020, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Issue Fee Payment and After Final Response filed Dec. 30, 2020, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/444,428 / Issue Notification dated Jan. 20, 2021, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/919,033 / U.S. Patent Application filed Jul. 1, 2020, 73 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/919,033 / Amended Application Data Sheet filed Jul. 2, 2020, 7 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/919,033 / Filing Receipt and Notice of Missing Parts dated Jul. 15, 2020, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/919,033 / Petition for Express Abandonment filed Sep. 8, 2020, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/919,033 / Decision Granting Petition for Express Abandonment dated Oct. 16, 2020, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / U.S. Patent Application filed Jul. 17, 2020, 73 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Filing Receipt dated Jul. 29, 2020, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Acceptance of Track One dated Jul. 30, 2020, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Aug. 25, 2020, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 14, 2020, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 15, 2020, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Notice of Publication dated Nov. 5, 2020, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Request for Continued Examination filed Nov. 5, 2020, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 3, 2020, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Issue Fee Payment and 312 Response filed Dec. 30, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/931,768 / Issue Notification dated Feb. 10, 2021, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,664, filed Feb. 26, 2021 / U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,664, filed Feb. 26, 2021, 56 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,664 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Mar. 10, 2021, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Patent Application filed Mar. 14, 2016, 90 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Filing Receipt and Informational Notice dated Mar. 29, 2016, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Request for Corrected filed Apr. 29, 2016, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 29, 2016, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Corrected Filing Receipt dated May 9, 2016, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Request for Corrected Filing Receipt dated May 31, 2016, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Corrected Filing Receipt dated Jun. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Notice of Publication dated Jul. 7, 2016, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Non-final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2017, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Response to Non-final Office Action filed Jul. 7, 2017, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 11, 2017, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Issue Fee Payment and 312 Amendment filed Nov. 9, 2017, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Request to Expedite Petition to Correct Priority filed Nov. 14, 2017, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Order Granting Petition to Correct Priority and Corrected Filing Receipt dated Nov. 28, 2017, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,985 / Issue Notification dated Jan. 10, 2018, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Application as filed Nov. 15, 2017, 77 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Dec. 13, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts and Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 12, 2018, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Feb. 15, 2018, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Amended Application Data Sheet filed Feb. 28, 2018, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Notice of Publication dated May 24, 2018, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2018, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Amendment and Terminal Disclaimer filed Aug. 30, 2018, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Request to Change Applicant Name filed Sep. 5, 2018, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jan. 9, 2019, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Final Rejection dated Mar. 11, 2019, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Response to Final Rejection and Terminal Disclaimer dated Mar. 20, 2019, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Approval Terminal Disclaimer dated Mar. 22, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Apr. 3, 2019, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 25, 2019, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Issue Fee Payment and 312 Amendment dated Jul. 3, 2019, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Response to 312 Amendment dated Aug. 6, 2019, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,546 / Issue Notification dated Aug. 14, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Patent Application filed Aug. 7, 2019, 81 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Aug. 21, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts dated Jan. 14, 2020, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jan. 14, 2020, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jan. 27, 2020, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Non-final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2020, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Notice of Publication dated Apr. 23, 2020, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Amendment filed Jul. 30, 2020, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2020, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/534,196 / Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2021, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Patent Application filed Sep. 17, 2018, 391 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Filing Receipt dated Jan. 9, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Mar. 8, 2019, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Notice of Publication dated Apr. 18, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Replacement Figures filed Apr. 23, 2019, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Examiner Interview Summary dated May 14, 2019, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Examiner Interview Summary dated May 16, 2019, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated May 24, 2019, 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Issue Fee Payment filed Jun. 10, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/085,680 / Issue Notification dated Jul. 24, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Patent Application filed Aug. 12, 2019, 105 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Aug. 23, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Response to Notice to File Missing Parts dated Oct. 23, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Oct. 25, 2019, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Jan. 29, 2020, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Notice of Publication dated Jan. 30, 2020, 1 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Issue Fee Payment filed Apr. 29, 2020, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,068 / Issue Notification dated May 20, 2020, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,351 / Patent Application filed Apr. 29, 2020, 98 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,351 / Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated May 6, 2020, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,351 / Response to Missing Parts and Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 6, 2020, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/862,351 / Notice of Publication dated Jan. 14, 2021, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Patent Application filed May 9, 2017, 130 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Filing Receipt and Informational Notice dated May 9, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Notice of Publication dated Aug. 24, 2017, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 24, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Response to Restriction Requirement and Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 12, 2018, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018, 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Amendment filed Dec. 18, 2018, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Applicant Summary of Interview with Examiner dated Mar. 22, 2019, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Apr. 5, 2019, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Request to Change Applicant Name filed May 24, 2019, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Updated Filing Receipt dated Jun. 3, 2019, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Issue Fee Payment filed Jul. 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,562 / Issue Notification dated Jul. 31, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Patent Application filed May 8, 2009, 61 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Filing Receipt dated May 8, 2009, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Notice of Publication dated Nov. 12, 2019, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599/ MIT1: Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2011, 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599/ MIT1: Amendment filed Apr. 13, 2012, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated May 22, 2012, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599/ MIT1: Examiner Initialed Interview Summary dated May 22, 2012, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Issue Fee Payment filed May 25, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/437,599 / MIT1: Issue Notification dated Jun. 13, 2012, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Patent Application filed Jun. 4, 2012, 51 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Filing Receipt and Notice to File Missing Parts dated Jun. 18, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Response to Notice to File Missing Parts dated Aug. 20, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Updated Filing Receipt dated Aug. 29, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 30, 2012, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Updated Filing Receipt dated Sep. 6, 2012, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 21, 2012, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Notice of Publication dated Dec. 13, 2012, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Sep. 4, 2013, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Issue Fee Payment and 312 Amendment filed Dec. 4, 2013, 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Response to 312 Amendment dated Dec. 27, 2013, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,781 / MIT2: Issue Notification dated Jan. 15, 2014, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Patent Application filed Aug. 30, 2012, 59 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Filing Receipt dated Sep. 17, 2012, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Preliminary Amendment dated Sep. 21, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Notice of Publication dated Dec. 27, 2012, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: e-Terminal Disclaimer filed and accepted Dec. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Jan. 2, 2014, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Issue Fee Payment dated Feb. 28, 2014, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,037 / MIT3: Issue Notification dated Mar. 26, 2014, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917 / MIT4: Patent Application filed Apr. 14, 2014, 63 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917/ MIT4: Filing Receipt dated May 5, 2014, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917 / MIT4: Notice of Publication dated Aug. 14, 2014, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917 / MIT4: 312 Amendment filed Apr. 22, 2015, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917 / MIT4: Response to 312 Amendment filed Apr. 30, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917/MIT4: Issue Fee Payment filed May 1, 2015, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/251,917/ MIT4: Issue Notification dated May 1, 2015, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Patent Application filed May 11, 2015, 57 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Filing Receipt and Notice of Missing Parts filed May 19, 2015, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Response to Notice of Missing Parts filed May 19, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Notice of Publication dated Oct. 1, 2015, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Non-final Office Action filed Oct. 1, 2015, 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903/ MIT5: Amendment and e-Terminal Disclaimer filed Jan. 3, 2017, 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Notice of Allowance and Allowability dated Feb. 23, 2017, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Issue Fee Payment filed Apr. 24, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Issue Notification dated May 10, 2017, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Request for Certificate of Correction filed Apr. 14, 2018, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,903 / MIT5: Request for Certificate of Correction filed Apr. 14, 2018,1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Patent Application filed May 3, 2017, 63 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Filing Receipt dated May 12, 2017, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Notice of Publication dated Aug. 17, 2017, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017, 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Amendment filed Apr. 5, 2018, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Supplemental Amendment filed Apr. 5, 2018, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Final Rejection dated Jul. 2, 2018, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/585,676 / MIT6: Notice of Abandonment dated Jan. 25, 2019, 2 pages. |
PCT/US12/36455 / PCT Application filed May 4, 2012, 59 pages. |
PCT/US12/36455 / International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
PCT/US12/36455 / International Preliminary Report an Patentability dated Nov. 5, 2013, 5 pages. |
CN201280033387 / First Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2015, 2 pages. |
CN201280033387 / First Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2015, 18 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Response to First Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2016, 11 pages. |
CN201280033387.X / Supplementary Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2016, 1 page. |
CN201280033387 / Second Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2016, 13 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Response to Second Office Action filed Aug. 18, 2016, 25 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Supplementary Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2017, 1 page. |
CN201280033387 / Third Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2016, 22 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Response to Third Office Action filed Jun. 1, 2017, 22 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Fourth Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2017, 24 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Response to Fourth Office Action filed Jan. 5, 2018, 11 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Decision to Grant ON Patent dated Jun. 6, 2018, 11 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Rectified Decision to Grant ON Patent dated Jun. 27, 2018, 4 pages. |
CN201280033387 / Certificate of Patent dated Sep. 21, 2018, 2 pages. |
CN201810954743 / CN Patent Application as filed Aug. 21, 2018, 59 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Filing Receipt dated Aug. 21, 2018, 1 page. |
CN201810954743 / Notice of Publication dated Dec. 7, 2018, 33 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Search Report dated Dec. 19, 2019, 2 pages. |
CN201810954743 / First Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2019, 23 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2019, 24 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Response to First Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2020, 34 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Second Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2020, 21 pages. |
CN201810954743 / Response to Second Office Action filed Feb. 7, 2020, 41 pages. |
EP12780024 / EP Application as filed Dec. 3, 2013, 19 pages. |
EP12780024 / Notice of Publication dated Feb. 12, 2014, 1 page. |
EP12780024 / Search Report and Opinion dated Feb. 18, 2015, 7 pages. |
EP12780024 / Rule 70 Communication dated Mar. 6, 2015, 1 page. |
EP12780024 / Amendment filed Dec. 16, 2015, 13 pages. |
EP12780024 / Article 94 Communication dated Feb. 23, 2016, 7 pages. |
EP12780024 / Amendment in Response to Article 94 Communication filed Aug. 10, 2016, 23 pages. |
EP12780024 / Article 94 Communication dated Jan. 3, 2017, 5 pages. |
EP12780024 / Amendment in Response to Article 94 Communication filed Jun. 8, 2017, 5 pages. |
EP12780024 / Intention to Grant dated Feb. 7, 2018, 103 pages. |
EP12780024 / Request for Correction/Amendment of Granted Claims filed Mar. 13, 2018, 103 pages. |
EP12780024 / Approval/Grant of Request for Correction/Amendment of Granted Claims dated Mar. 13, 2018, 3 pages. |
EP12780024 / Revised Intention to Grant dated Jul. 4, 2018, 99 pages. |
EP12780024 / Decision to Grant dated Jul. 19, 2018, 2 pages. |
EP12780024 / Patent Certificate dated Aug. 15, 2018, 2. |
page. |
EP18188795 / EP Patent Application as filed Aug. 13, 2018, 62 pages. |
EP18188795 / European Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2018, 3 pages. |
EP18188795 / Extended European Search Report and Opinion dated Oct. 9, 2018, 8 pages. |
EP18188795 / Notice of Publication dated Dec. 12, 2018, 2 pages. |
EP18188795 / Amendment and Request for Examination filed Jun. 17, 2019, 28 pages. |
EP18188795 / Article 94(3) Communication dated Nov. 11, 2019, 7 pages. |
EP18188795/ Amendment / Response to 94(3) Objection filed Aug. 21, 2020, 7 pages. |
EP18188795 / Decision on the Request for Further Processing under 135(3) EPC Sep. 1, 2020, 1 page. |
EP18188795 / Article 94(3) Communication dated Jan. 12, 2021, 5 pages. |
KR20137032399 / KR Patent Application filed May 12, 2013, 136 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Request for Amendment of Inventor Information filed Dec. 13, 2013, 2 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Amendment of Biographic Data entered Dec. 23, 2013, 4 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, 8 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Amendment to Claims filed Jan. 15, 2015, 21 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Response to Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2015, 15 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Final Office Action dated May 22, 2015, 5 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Amendment filed Jun. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Response to Final Office Action filed Jun. 17, 2015, 5 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Grant of Patent dated Jun. 24, 2015, 2 pages. |
KR20137032399 / Patent Certificate dated Sep. 23, 2015, 2 pages. |
PCT/US16/22040 / PCT Application filed Mar. 11, 2016, 71 pages, |
PCT/US16/22040 / International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 20, 2016, 10 pages. |
PCT/US16/22040 / Article 19 Amendment filed Sep. 22, 2016, 10 pages. |
PCT/US16/22040 / International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 19, 2017, 7 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / CN Application as filed Nov. 9, 2017, 167 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / First Office Action dated May 7, 2019, 22 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / Response to First Office Action filed Nov. 22, 2019, 25 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / Second Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2020, 12 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / Response to Second Office Action filed Aug. 3, 2020, 31 pages. |
CN201680027105.3 / Third Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2021, 26 pages. |
DE112016001188 / DE Application filed Sep. 13, 2017, 172 pages. |
JP2017567041 / JP Application filed Sep. 12, 2017, 68 pages. |
JP2017567041 / Office Action dated May 25, 2020, 30 pages. |
JP2017567041 / Response to Office Action filed Oct. 26, 2020, 87 pages. |
JP2017567041 / Final Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021, 8 pages. |
KR20177029575 / KR Application filed Oct. 13, 2017, 169 pages. |
KR20177029575 / Request for Amendment to Signatory filed Oct. 23, 2017, 2 pages. |
KR20177029575 / Allowed Amendment to Signatory dated Dec. 11, 2017, 4 pages. |
KR20177029575 / Voluntary Amendment and Request for Examination filed Mar. 9, 2021, 38 pages. |
TW105107546 / TW Application filed Mar. 11, 2016, 65 pages. |
PCT/US2017/023191 / PCT Application filed Mar. 20, 2017, 94 pages. |
PCT/US2017/023191 / Intl Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2017, 9 pages. |
CN 201780030693 / CN Patent Application filed Nov. 16, 2018, 129 pages. |
CN 201780030693 / Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2020, 15 pages. |
CN 201780030693 / Response to Office Action filed Nov. 12, 2020, 63 pages. |
KR 10-2018-7030031 / KR Patent Application filed Oct. 17, 2018, 169. |
pages. |
KR20157016195 / KR Divisional Application filed Jun. 17, 2015, 126 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Request for Amendment of Inventor Information filed Jul. 2, 2015, 2 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Amendment of Bibliographic Data dated Jul. 3, 2015, 4 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Amendment filed Feb. 29, 2015, 13 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Amendment filed Apr. 13, 2017, 15 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Request for Examination filed Apr. 20, 2017, 2 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2017, 9 pages. |
KR20157016195 / Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2017/031726 / PCT Application filed May 9, 2017, 67 pages. |
PCT/US2017/031726 / Intl Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2017, 67 pages. |
PCT/US2017/031726 / Intl Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 22, 2018, 67 pages. |
CN201780042383 / CN Patent Application filed Jan. 7, 2019, 275 pages. |
CN201780042383 / Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2020, 16 pages. |
CN201780042383 / Response to Office Action filed Nov. 13, 2020, 19 pages. |
CN201780042383 / Decision to Grant dated Dec. 14, 2020, 4 pages. |
202110224392.X / Patent Application No. 202110224392.X filed Mar. 1, 2021, 128 pages. |
DE112017002374 / DE Patent Application filed Nov. 8, 2018, 167 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190393777 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62333402 | May 2016 | US | |
62333432 | May 2016 | US | |
61482838 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61548360 | Oct 2011 | US | |
61577271 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15590562 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 16456060 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14513747 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 15138692 | US | |
Parent | 13771904 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14513747 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2012/036455 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13771904 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15138692 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15590562 | US |