The present invention relates to a system and a method for improving performance of an exhaust gas aftertreatment device, and more particularly to using an air assist heated reductant delivery system to enhance system performance and reduce fuel penalty.
Current emission control regulations necessitate the use of catalysts in the exhaust systems of automotive vehicles in order to convert carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) produced during engine operation into harmless exhaust gasses. Vehicles equipped with diesel or lean gasoline engines offer the benefits of increased fuel economy. Such vehicles have to be equipped with lean exhaust aftertreatment devices such as, for example, a urea-based Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) catalyst, which is capable of continuously reducing NOx emissions, even in an oxygen rich environment. Urea-based SCR catalysts use gaseous ammonia as the active NOx reducing agent. Typically, an aqueous solution of urea is carried on board of a vehicle, and an injection system is used to supply it into the exhaust gas stream. The heat in the exhaust gas causes the aqueous urea solution to decompose into ammonia and hydro-cyanic acid (HNCO). These decomposition products enter the SCR where the gas phase ammonia is adsorbed and the cyanic acid is further decomposed on the SCR to gas phase ammonia. The adsorbed ammonia then takes part in the reduction of gas phase NOx.
The inventors herein have recognized a disadvantage with this approach. Namely, optimum system efficiency is not achieved unless the injected aqueous urea is well distributed and atomized and has sufficient time in the exhaust gas to complete conversion into gaseous ammonia prior to reaching SCR catalyst brick face. The inventors have further recognized that a typical prior art urea injection system is not effective in achieving this because it sends out a directed spray of urea that does not mix well with the exhaust gasses. Further, this spray of urea might impact the catalyst brick directly, thus depositing aqueous urea on it and degrading the catalyst.
The present invention teaches a system and a method for introducing reductant into a urea based SCR catalyst that overcomes the above-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art.
In accordance with the present invention, a method for controlling a reductant delivery system having at least a heating element, the delivery system coupled upstream of an SCR catalyst, includes: injecting air into the reductant delivery system; injecting reductant into the reductant delivery system; providing an operating temperature for the heated element thereby creating a vaporized mixture of said injected air and said injected reductant; and directing said vaporized mixture into an exhaust gas mixture entering the SCR catalyst.
The present invention provides a number of advantages. In particular, using a heating element in the reductant delivery system supplies sufficient energy for decomposition of urea into HNCO and NH3, even under cold exhaust conditions, thus improving the SCR catalyst's NOx conversion efficiency throughout the drive cycle. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that vaporizing the urea solution improves its mixing and distribution in the exhaust gas. Additionally, the housing around the heated element serves as a deflector for the part of the injected urea spray that escapes impingement on the heated surface thus breaking it up into small particles and further improving its mixing and distribution. Also, using the air-assist heated reductant delivery system reduces the necessary residence time of the urea solution in the exhaust gas, and thus improves the overall system response time.
The above advantages and other advantages, objects and features of the present invention will be readily apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The objects and advantages described herein will be more fully understood by reading an example of an embodiment in which the invention is used to advantage, referred to herein as the Description of Preferred Embodiment, with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Internal combustion engine 10, comprising a plurality of cylinders, one cylinder of which is shown in
Controller 12 is shown in
An emission control system 20, coupled to an exhaust manifold 48, is described in detail in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Catalyst 14 is a urea based Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) catalyst in which NOx is reduced through active injection of an aqueous urea solution or other nitrogen-based reductant into the exhaust gas entering the device. The urea solution is converted into hydro cyanic acid (NHCO) and gaseous ammonia (NH3) prior to entering the SCR catalyst, wherein NH3 serves an active NOx reducing agent in the SCR.
In a preferred embodiment, the SCR catalyst is a base metal/zeolite formulation with optimum NOx conversion performance in the temperature range of 200-500° C. Oxidation catalyst 13 is coupled upstream of the SCR catalyst and may be a precious metal catalyst, preferably one containing Platinum for high conversion of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. The oxidation catalyst exothermically combusts hydrocarbons (HC) in the incoming exhaust gas from the engine thus supplying heat to rapidly warm up the SCR catalyst 14. Particulate filter 15 is coupled downstream of the SCR catalyst for storing soot.
A reductant delivery system 16 is coupled to the exhaust gas manifold between the oxidation catalyst and the SCR catalyst. Air and reductant are injected into the reductant delivery system, where they are vaporized by the heated element and the resulting vapor is introduced into the exhaust gas mixture entering the SCR catalyst. Alternative embodiments of the reductant delivery system in accordance with the present invention are described later herein with particular reference to
The diagram of
In yet another alternative embodiment (not shown), a hydrolyzing catalytic coating could be added to the evaporator unit such as, for example, a coating on the inner surface of the heating element housing, or a catalytic cap at the point where the evaporated reductant and air mixture enters the exhaust gas manifold. The close proximity of the hydrolyzing catalyst serves to increase overall NH3 production by converting HNCO to NH3. Controller 12 controls the temperature of the heating element by providing a PWM signal of varying duty cycles. The duty cycle of the PWM control signal to the heating element is determined from a prestored table based on operating conditions to achieve desired heating element temperature to optimally vaporize/decompose the injected urea. Mixing unit 23 has a reductant inlet and an air inlet and an outlet 24 coupled to the evaporator unit 21 through which a mixture of reductant and air is injected into the housing and subsequently comes into contact with the surface of the heating element 22.
In an alternative embodiment (not shown); both air and reductant can be injected through a single input. The reductant is metered out by a pump through a control valve, where both the pump and the valve are controlled by controller 12. Air pump 25 supplies pressurized air to the mixing unit 23 thereby creating a mixture of reductant and air. Outlet 24 is configured to deliver the reductant and air mixture to more than one area on the surface of the heating element. Controller 12 can selectively enable and disable injection of the mixture to these areas depending on operating conditions, such as engine speed, load, exhaust gas temperature, etc. For example, when the amount of reductant required is high, such as at high load conditions, it may be necessary to enable delivery of the reductant and air mixture to more than one area on the surface of the heating element. Alternatively, outlet 24 may be configured to deliver the reductant and air mixture to a specific area on the surface of the heating element.
Therefore, NOx conversion efficiency of a urea-based SCR catalyst can be increased by using a reductant delivery system according to the present invention wherein a mixture of urea and air is injected into the system, and is vaporized by the heat generated by the heated element. Supplying reductant and air mixture in a vapor form ensures that it is well mixed with the exhaust gasses entering the SCR catalyst, and therefore high levels of urea conversion to NH3 and HNCO are achieved prior to entering the catalyst. An additional advantage is achieved by the fact the catalyst does not get contaminated by urea deposits on its front brick.
In a preferred embodiment, the reductant delivery system also includes a hydrolyzing catalyst placed in the path of the vaporized reductant and air mixture prior to its mixing with the exhaust gasses, which further facilitates NH3 generation.
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the routine described in
Referring now to
Therefore, by generating a map of the heating element temperature based on operating conditions, such as the exhaust gas temperature, or any parameter known to affect the temperature of the heated element, it is possible to dynamically control the temperature of the heated element to achieve optimal reductant and air mixture delivery while minimizing power consumption and preventing overheating of the heating element. In other words, it is possible to take advantage of the heat provided by the exhaust gas passing through the reductant delivery system when controlling the temperature of the heating element. For example, higher exhaust gas temperature result in less power requirements, while lower exhaust gas temperatures result in higher power requirements. It is also possible to completely turn off power supply when the exhaust gas temperature is high enough to keep the heating element at desired temperature such as at high engine load conditions.
Referring now to
wherein RAfg is the amount of reductant in the exhaust gas mixture entering the device, which can be determined based on engine operating conditions. This initial reductant amount, RAinj
RAinj
The routine then proceeds to step 800 wherein the instantaneous change in the pedal position is computed as follows:
where Ts is the sampling rate, and pps(t) denotes the pedal position at time t. Next, in step 900, a low pass filter is applied to smooth out the noise:
pps—diff—lp(t)=(1−kf)·pps—diff—lp(t−1)+kfpps—diff(t−1)
where kf controls the rate of filtering. The routine then proceeds to step 1000 wherein the reductant amount is further modified to account for engine transient behaviors as represented by the changes in the pedal position:
RAinj
where function f5 is shaped to allow overinjection of reductant during pedal position tip-in and underinjection of reductant during pedal position tip-out. In an alternative embodiment, instead of pedal position, engine speed or fuel demand sensor, or any other parameter known to those skilled in the art to provide a measure of engine transient behavior may be used to obtain RAinj
Therefore, according to the present invention, in order to achieve more efficient exhaust gas aftertreatment device performance, the amount of reductant to be injected should be adjusted to account for increases and decreases in the amount of NOx in the exhaust gas entering the device. This can be accomplished by continuously monitoring engine parameters that are capable of providing a measure of engine transient behaviors, such as a pedal position sensor, and continuously adjusting the amount of reductant to be injected as a function of filtered instantaneous changes in these parameters. Since NOx production typically increases at tip-in and decreases at tip-out, the result of such operation would be to increase the base injected amount in the former case, and decrease the base injected amount in the latter case. Further, using a reductant vaporizer unit ensures fast system response, more efficient system operation, better emission control, and improved fuel economy.
This concludes the description of the invention. The reading of it by those skilled in the art would bring to mind many alterations and modifications without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4036180 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4112876 | Mentschel | Sep 1978 | A |
4170200 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4222351 | Kosaka et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4403473 | Gladden | Sep 1983 | A |
4576617 | Renevot | Mar 1986 | A |
4762093 | McCabe et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4854123 | Inoue | Aug 1989 | A |
5021227 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5201802 | Hirota et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209061 | Takeshima | May 1993 | A |
5233934 | Krigmont et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5272871 | Oshima et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5367875 | Aboujaoude et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369956 | Daudel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5410873 | Tashiro | May 1995 | A |
5412946 | Oshima et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426934 | Hunt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428956 | Maus et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5479775 | Kraemer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522218 | Lane et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540047 | Dahlheim et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5601792 | Hug et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609022 | Cho | Mar 1997 | A |
5609026 | Berriman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628186 | Schmelz | May 1997 | A |
5643536 | Schmetz | Jul 1997 | A |
5665318 | Rembold et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5706652 | Sultan | Jan 1998 | A |
5751602 | Maus et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771689 | Bareis et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5806310 | Daidou et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809775 | Tarabulski et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831145 | Logothetis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842341 | Kibe | Dec 1998 | A |
5845487 | Fraenkle et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5884475 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884476 | Hirota et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893267 | Vogtlin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910096 | Hepburn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921076 | Krutzsch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924280 | Tarabulski | Jul 1999 | A |
5941067 | Hirota et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943858 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950422 | Dolling | Sep 1999 | A |
5968464 | Peter-Hoblyn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6001318 | Tillaart et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003305 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016653 | Glassey et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017503 | Kato et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021640 | Hirota et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038854 | Penetrante et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041594 | Brenner et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050088 | Brenner | Apr 2000 | A |
6066303 | Sudduth et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079203 | Wakamoto | Jun 2000 | A |
6082102 | Wissler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089015 | Strehlau et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119448 | Emmerling et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119451 | Vogtlin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122909 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122910 | Hoshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125629 | Patchett | Oct 2000 | A |
6131388 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134883 | Kato et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167698 | King et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171566 | Ku et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182443 | Jarvis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6182444 | Fulton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192675 | Hirota et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209315 | Weigl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221324 | Coq et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233925 | Hirota et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260353 | Takahashi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266955 | Liang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269633 | Van Nieuwstadt et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273120 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294141 | Twigg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299847 | Allen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301879 | Weisweiler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305160 | Hammerle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311480 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314722 | Matros et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314919 | Pugachev | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6357223 | Caren et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357226 | Borland | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6383463 | Mochida et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387336 | Marko et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6415602 | Patchett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449945 | van Nieuwstadt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449947 | Liu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470673 | Van Nieuwstadt et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487852 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491885 | Tokunaga et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6722124 | Pawson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0487886 | Jun 1992 | EP |
WO 9939809 | Aug 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040098971 A1 | May 2004 | US |