Patent Grant
7744749
This invention is directed to the removal of sulfur-containing compounds from diesel fuel and, more particularly, their removal by a combination of oxidation and extraction steps.
The removal of sulfur compounds from petroleum streams has been of considerable importance in the past and is even more so today due to environmental considerations. Gas effluent from the combustion of organic materials, such as coal, almost always contain sulfur compounds and sulfur removal processes have concentrated on removing hydrogen sulfide since it has been considered a significant health hazard and also because it is corrosive, particularly when water is present. With increasing emphasis on eliminating or minimizing sulfur discharge to the atmosphere, attention is turning to the removal of other sulfur compounds from gas streams.
The removal of sulfur compounds and particularly chemically-combined sulfur, such as organosulfur compounds, from feedstreams is highly desirable to meet environmental concerns and to prevent potential catalyst deactivation as well as equipment corrosion.
Typically, hydrocarbon products contain various amounts of sulfur compounds in the form of, for example, chemically-combined sulfur, such as inorganically combined sulfur and organically combined sulfur, i.e., organosulfur compounds.
The presence of organosulfur compounds in hydrocarbon streams results naturally, as well as from the introduction of organosulfur compounds, into the hydrogen streams during conventional processes for producing and treating hydrocarbon products.
As previously indicated, if chemically-combined sulfur, such as organosulfur compounds, are not removed from the hydrocarbon streams, the presence of organosulfur compounds in the resultant hydrocarbon products, including natural gas, paraffins, olefins and aromatics, particularly gasoline, diesel or other fuels, can cause corrosion of processing equipment and engine parts, as well as other deleterious effects, particularly when water is present.
Oxidative desulfurization research for diesel and other oil streams has been ongoing for over 100 years. The following table summarizes patents granted from 1941 to 1976 addressed to oxidative desulfurization.
Paris-Marcano received two patents for oxidative desulfurization of petroleum using nitric acid with hydrogen peroxide, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,017,280 and 5,087,350. Gore of Petrostar received two patents for oxidative desulfurization U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,274,785 and 6,160,193. Cabrerra received a patent for a complex oxidative desulfurization patent assigned to UOP U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,478. Rappas from Unipure received two patents for oxidative desulfurization using performic acid: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,402,940 and 6,406,616, and Ohsohl of Unipure has received two patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,985,137, 5,948,242 for desulfurization of crude oil.
Jeanblanc received a patent, WO/001 5734 for radiative assisted oxidative desulfurization. Sulfur-containing carbonaceous materials are desulfurized by reaction with a mixture of an oxidizing agent and an oxygenated solvent such as diethyl ether under alkaline conditions at a temperature preferably ranging from ambient temperature to about 121° C. and pressure of about 1 to 2 atmospheres. The use of radiation—such as X-ray, infrared, visible microwave, or ultraviolet radiation, alpha, beta or gamma radiation, other atomic radiation emanating from a radioactive material, or ultrasound—facilitates desulfurization. The products of the reaction are a desulfurized carbonaceous material in which the sulfur content is (for example) less than about 1% and separated sulfur compounds.
Yen, U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,939 at Cal Tech received a patent for ultrasonic assisted oxidative desulfurization. Gunnerman has obtained several patents using ultrasonic assistance: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,500,219, 6,652,592. Stowe disclosed a process to oxidatively desulfurize hydrocarbon oil with ultrasonic assistance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,547,563.
Cullen disclosed in four recent U.S. patent applications assigned to Petrosonics oxidative, reactive, ultrasonic desulfurization technology: Ser. No. 10/411,796 filed Apr. 11, 2003, Sulfone Removal Process; Ser. No. 10/429,369 filed May 5, 2003, Process For Generating and Removing Sulfoxides from Fossil Fuel; Ser. No. 10/431,666 filed May 8, 2003, Treatment of Crude Oil Fractions, Fossil Fuels & Products Thereof with Sonic Energy; and Ser. No. 10/644,255 filed Aug. 20, 2003, entitled Treatment of Crude Oil Fractions, Fossil Fuels & Products Thereof.
Collins, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,847,120 and 6,054,580 disclosed long-lived tetraamidomacriocyclic ligand complexes of iron as homogeneous oxidation catalysts to promote peroxide oxidations. The complex provides a stable, long-lived oxidation catalyst or catalyst activator.
Kocal in U.S. Pat. No. 6,277,271 Aug. 21, 2001 assigned to UOP discloses a process for the desulfurization of a hydrocarbonaceous oil. This is a process for the desulfurization of hydrocarbonaceous oil wherein the hydrocarbonaceous oil and a recycle stream containing sulfur-oxidated compounds is contacted with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in a hydrodesulfurization reaction zone to reduce the sulfur level to a relatively low level and then contacting the resulting hydrocarbonaceous stream from the hydrodesulfurization zone with an oxidizing agent to convert the residual, low level of sulfur compounds into sulfur-oxidated compounds. The residual oxidizing agent is decomposed and the resulting hydrocarbonaceous oil stream containing the sulfur-oxidated compounds is separated to produce a stream containing the sulfur-oxidated compounds and a hydrocarbonaceous oil stream having a reduced concentration of sulfur-oxidated compounds. At least a portion of the sulfur-oxidated compounds is recycled to the hydrodesulfurization reaction zone.
In another UOP assigned patent, Kocal in U.S. Pat. No. 6,368,495 granted Apr. 9, 2002 discloses the removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams using hydrogen peroxide on air, with heterogeneous transition metal catalysts. The process more specifically addresses the removal of thiophenes and thiophene derivatives from a number of petroleum fractions, including gasoline, diesel fuel, and kerosene. In the first step of the process, the liquid hydrocarbon is subjected to oxidation conditions in order to oxidize at least some of the thiophene compounds to sulfones. Then, these sulfones can be catalytically decomposed to hydrocarbons (e.g. hydroxybiphenyl) and volatile sulfur compounds (e.g., sulfur dioxide). The hydrocarbon decomposition products remain in the treated liquid as valuable blending components, while the volatile sulfur compounds are easily separable from the treated liquid using well-known techniques such as flash vaporization or distillation.
Cabrera discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 6,174,178 granted Jan. 9, 2001, a new process for the desulfurization of a hydrocarbonaceous oil. A process for the desulfurization of hydrocarbonaceous oil wherein the hydrocarbonaceous oil is contacted with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in a hydrodesulfurization reaction zone to reduce the sulfur level to a relatively low level and then contacting the resulting hydrocarbonaceous stream from the desulfurization zone with an oxidizing agent to convert the residual, low level of sulfur compounds into sulfur-oxidated compounds. The resulting hydrocarbonaceous oil stream containing the sulfur-oxidated compounds is separated after decomposing any residual oxidizing agent to produce a stream containing the sulfur-oxidated compounds and a hydrocarbonaceous oil stream having a reduced concentration of sulfur-oxidated compounds.
Shum teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 4,772,731 granted Sep. 20, 1988, the epoxidation of olefins with molybdenum dioxo dialkyleneglycolate compositions. Production of novel molybdenum dioxo dialkyleneglycolate compositions, especially adapted for use as catalysts in the epoxidation of olefinic compounds with an organic hydroperoxide, by reaction of molybdenum trioxide with particular dialkylene glycol compounds at specified elevated temperatures while removing water.
Shum discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,655 granted Jul. 14, 1998, an epoxidation process using an alkylammonium phosphate-stabilized peroxotungstate compound as catalyst. Olefins are selectively converted to epoxides using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant in a single liquid phase reaction system characterized by a liquid phase comprised predominantly of an organic solvent. The reaction is catalyzed by a compound comprised of a phosphate-stabilized peroxotungstate species having a W:P atomic ratio of 2:1. This invention pertains to methods of converting olefins to epoxides in a single liquid phase using hydrogen peroxide and a catalyst in salt or acid form comprising a species corresponding to (R4N)2PW2O13(OH).
Venturello in U.S. Pat. No. 5,274,140 discloses a process for olefin epoxidation by reaction with hydrogen peroxide according to a double phase technique (i.e., a biphasic reaction system containing both an aqueous phase and an organic phase). The catalyst system consists of a first component which is at least one element selected from W, Mo, V or a derivative thereof and a second component which is at least one derivative selected from the derivatives of P and As. The mutual atomic ratio of the catalyst components is between 12 and 0.1, but preferably is between 1.5 and 0.25.
Venturello in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,562,276 and 4,595,671 describes epoxidation catalysts for olefinic compounds, both in a homogeneous aqueous phase as well as in a heterogeneous phase. The catalysts correspond to the formula Q3XW4O24−2n wherein Q represents a cation of an anionic salt, X is either P or As, while n=0, 1, or 2. The atomic ratio of W:P, where X=P, thus must be 4. The use of such compositions in an epoxidation wherein the reactants are maintained in a single substantially organic phase is not disclosed.
Bonsignore in U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,849 teaches a class of compounds based on tungsten and diphosphonic acids which contain active oxygen atoms and cationic groups derived from onium salts. Such compounds are said to catalyze olefin oxidation reactions in double phase reaction systems containing both an organic phase and an aqueous phase. The compounds contain two phosphorus atoms and five tungsten atoms and thus have a W:P atomic ratio of 5:2.
However, the biphasic reaction systems of the type described in the aforementioned patents have a number of disadvantages which limit their usefulness in large scale commercial practice. The need to use a phase transfer agent contributes significantly to the cost of operation. Mass transfer problems are frequently encountered, particularly for relatively volatile olefins such as propylene. Additionally, there are considerable engineering difficulties associated with operating two phase reactors and phase separators. Thus, there is a need to develop active catalysts capable of providing high selectivity to epoxide during operation of a single phase epoxidation process.
The process of the present invention is directed to the desulfurization of a full-range, hydrotreated diesel oil with an aqueous oxidizing agent in the presence of a catalyst and a co-catalyst, and thereafter selectively removing the oxidized compounds by solvent extraction. Optionally, the foregoing steps are followed by solvent stripping and recovery, and finally by a polishing step.
As can be seen by reference to
The process serves to desulfurize full range hydrotreated diesel oil with a boiling range of about 240° C. to about 360° C. The process consists of treating the diesel oil in a countercurrent or a stirred tank reactor with an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a catalyst and a co-catalyst which is also known as a phase transfer agent. This action results in effecting the oxidation of the sulfur species present in the hydrotreated (HT) diesel at a nominal level of 1000 ppm w/w of total sulfur. The sulfur species present are oxidized to their corresponding sulfoxides, sulfones, sultines, sultones, sulfonates, sulfinates, or even to sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide and sulfite and sulfate.
The catalyst employed may be selected from a number of homogeneous or heterogeneous oxidation catalysts including tetraamidomacrocylic iron complexes, tetraalkylammonim polyoxometallates, dioxomolybdenum diglycolate, transition metal tetraphenylporphyrin, transition metal acetylacetonate, bismuthomolybdates, dioxomolybdenum aminodiglycolate, tetraalkylammonim metal sulfotetraphenylporphyrin, molybdotungstic acid phosphonates, as well as many others. These may include quaternary ammonium salts of polyoxometallates, simple metal oxides, Venturello, Campos-Martin, Bressan, Shum, Collins-Horwitz, Beardon, Folin-Denis Reagent, Benedict, Bonsignore, Changwen Hu, Mere Te, Keggin, Dawson, Bearden, and Merox type catalysts. These may include Tetraoctyl-Ammonium Phosphotungstate, Peroxo Molybdotungstic Phosphonate, Phosphomolybdic Acid, Dioxomolybdenum Amino-Diisopropanolate, Triphosphono-Polyperoxotungstate, Bismuthomolybdic Acid, Sodium Sulfophthalocyanine Cobalt Peroxide.
The co-catalysts are employed to enhance and accelerate reactions which though favored thermodynamically, are very slow due to mass transfer issues. They may be anionic cationic and nonionic, with cationic phase transfer agents being preferred. In the present invention, the co-catalyst in each case is the quaternary amine salt used in the synthesis.
These salts do not always have to be pre-formed prior to the reaction, but may be formed in-situ, by adding the transition metal salt or acid and then adding to the same solvent system, for example, aqueous peroxide, the phase transfer agent, such as a quaternary ammonium halide. Representative phase transfer agents are methyltrioctyl-ammonium bromide, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, tetrabutyl ammonium chloride, tetradecyl pyridium chloride, and tetradecyl pyridinium bromide.
The oxidation reaction takes place in a countercurrent reactor 12, which may be static, stirred, agitated, with oscillating or rotating discs, at a temperature between 50 to 150° C. preferably between about 70 and about 110°. Raffinate from the oxidation which contains residual catalyst, spent or residual oxidant, is recycled to the oxidant-catalyst storage tank 14, where make-up catalyst and oxidant are added.
The concentration of the catalysts may be between about 0.001 and about 1.00, by weight % on oxidant, and preferably between about 0.01 and about 0.10 weight %. Oxidant concentrations may vary between about 1% and about 100%, by weight, but are typically between about 10% and about 50%, and in the case of hydrogen peroxide are preferably between about 15% and about 30%, by weight, in the aqueous phase. Oxidants vary by chemical type, oxidation potential, efficacy, stability, solubility and persons of ordinary skill in the art can establish readily the useful and effective concentrations of oxidant. Oxidants which can be used in the present process include hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, sodium or potassium peroxydisulfate or peroxymonosulfate, t-butyl hydroperoxide, perchloric acid, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, performic acid, and mixtures thereof.
The second step of the process involves the removal of the oxidized compounds by contacting the distillate with a selective extraction solvent in column 16. As reported in the literature concerning the ODS process, the liquid-liquid extraction technique using water-soluble polar solvents, such as DMSO, DMF, methanol, and acetonitrile, is usually employed. DMSO and DMF have a high extractability for sulfones but have a high boiling point, which is close to the boiling point of the sulfones, and thus they may not be reused for further extraction based on recovery by distillation. Methanol and acetonitrile are preferred for use as the extraction solvent, since they have relatively low boiling points and are separated easily from the sulfones and other oxidized sulfur species by distillation. When methanol and acetonitrile are contacted with light oil, a large quantity of aromatics is extracted simultaneously with the sulfones. The addition of water, however, suppresses the extractability of the aromatics. Examples of polar solvents include those with high values of the Hildebrand solubility parameter .delta.; liquids with a .delta. higher than about 22 have been successfully used to extract these compounds. Examples of polar liquids, with their Hildebrand values, are shown in the following:
However, as will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, mere polarity considerations are insufficient to define successful extraction solvents. Methanol, for instance, has sufficient polarity, but its density, 0.79 g/cc, is about the same as that of a typical light oil, making separations very difficult. Other properties to consider include boiling point, freezing point, viscosity, and surface tension. Surprisingly, the combination of the properties exhibited by DMSO make it an excellent solvent for extracting oxidized sulfur and nitrogen compounds from liquid light oil, but unfortunately it contains a large proportion of sulfur. Heteroatom solvents containing nitrogen, phosphorous, and sulfur must be very volatile to ensure stripping of the solvent out of the diesel oil. The preferred solvents in this process are acetonitrile and methanol, due to their polarity, volatility, and low cost.
In the second stage or step, the oxidized sulfur compounds are extracted in countercurrent extractor 16 of the Karr, Scheibel, or other configuration of countercurrent or stirred tank extractor to remove the oxidized sulfur compounds from the diesel oil. The extraction phase is composed of an aqueous solution containing from about 10 to about 30% water in a polar organic solvent, including acetonitrile, methanol, or other solvent. Therefore, the solvents should be sufficiently polar to be selective for polar compounds in the process of extraction.
In a third stage of the process a stripper column is employed to remove traces of the solvent from the diesel oil. The solvent is recovered and sent to the solvent recovery fractionator 20.
In a fourth stage of the process, the extraction-rich solvent is recovered in a stripper recovery flash evaporator (not shown). Bottoms from the evaporator are purged to a sulfone storage tank to be sold as petrochemical intermediates, or added to fuel oil or crude oil.
In a fifth stage of this process, the diesel oil is passed through an adsorbent polishing column which removes the last traces of sulfur to below 10 ppm w/w from the diesel oil. Many adsorbents can be used for this purpose, including activated carbon, silica gel, alumina and other inorganic adsorbents. In a preferred embodiment of this invention, a new adsorbent comprised of polar polymers coated onto inert but high surface area supports, such as silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon are utilized. These polymers include, among other candidates, polysulfones, polyacrylonitrile, polystyrene, polyester terephthalate, polyurethane, and other polymers which demonstrate affinity for oxidized sulfur species. The advantage of using the polymer coated onto the support is that the adsorption and desorbtion processes are rapid and reversible, and the adsorbates are easily recovered, and the column is easily regenerated by extraction with a suitable solvent and dried.
Insofar as the catalyst preparations and oxidations disclosed in the following examples are concerned, guidance was provided by the following references for their respective examples.
Carlo Venturello Catalyst {(C8H17)4N}3PW4O24FW 2550.99)
A. Preparation of Venturello Catalyst: Sodium tungstate, Na2WO4.2H2O (3.30 g, 10 mmol) was weigned to a 250 ml beaker and 7 ml of 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 was added and stirred at 25° C. until a colorless solution was obtained. To this solution, was added 1.0 ml 85% phosphoric acid H3PO4 and the whole was diluted to 50 ml with water. To the resultant solution, 2.5 g of tetraoctylammonium chloride (Aldrich) in methylene chloride was added dropwise with stirring over about 2 min. Stirring was continued for an additional 15 min. The organic phase was then separated, filtered, and evaporated at room temperature overnite to give 3.5 g of a colorless syrup.
B. Oxidation of Arabian Light Gas Oil: A 100-ml sample of full range (FR) hydrotreated (HT) Arabian Light Gas Oil (ALGO) containing 910 ppm w/v of total sulfur was heated to 85° C. with stirring on a stirring hot plate. A 50-ml portion of 15% w/w hydrogen peroxide in water was added then 50 mg of catalyst A. Preparation of Venturello Catalyst, tris(cetyltrimethylammonium) phophotungstate (Venturello Catalyst) was added. The reaction was continued for 15 minutes then the reactants were cooled and poured into a 250-ml separatory funnel. The aqueous peroxide lower phase was withdrawn and discarded. A sample of the oil phase was analyzed by gas chromatography with a Sievers Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector (GC-SCD), and compared with a sample of the original FR HT ALGO. The chromatogram showed the presence of apparently the same amount of sulfur, but the sulfur peaks were displaced until later in the chromatogram, indicating the formation of sulfones. Sulfur analysis showed the oxidized sample to contain 880 ppm w/v sulfur, allowing for analytical error, indicating no removal of the sulfur.
C. Batch Extraction Of Oxidized Oil: The 100 ml sample of oil phase prepared in B. Oxidation of Arabian Light Gas Oil, was extracted twice with 50 ml portions of acetonitrile containing 10% v/v distilled water. After the second extraction, 98 ml of oil was recovered, and analyzed for total sulfur and was found to contain 60 ppm sulfur w/v. The oil sample was analyzed by GC-SCD and the original and oxidized sulfur peaks were practically all removed. The two extracts were combined and were evaporated overnight to a dry oil, and was then analyzed by GCMS and GC-SCD. The GC-SCD indicated the presence of the alkylbenzothiophene-dioxides and alkyldibenzothiophene-dioxides that were present originally in the oxidate oil. GCMS results indicated the presence of methyl, dimethyl, trimethyl, and tetramethyl benzothiophene sulfones and dibenzothiophene sulfones.
D. Countercurrent Extraction Of Oxidized Oil: A 100-ml sample of full range (FR) Hydrotreated (HT) Arabian Light Gas Oil (ALGO) containing 910 ppm w/v of total sulfur was oxidized as in B. Oxidation of Arabian Light Gas Oil, but was not extracted. The 100 ml sample of oxidized oil containing approximately 900 ppm w/v sulfur as sulfones, was transferred to a 2.5 cm by 75 cm fritted countercurrent extraction apparatus containing 50 cm of glass beads of 3 mm diameter. A Hitachi L2000 laboratory pump was used to pump 150 ml of acetonitrile:water 90:10 v/v at 10 ml/min upward through the fritt and through the oxidized oil. After countercurrent extraction with the mixed polar solvent, the oil was withdrawn from the extraction apparatus and analyzed by GC-SCD and for total sulfur. No sulfur peaks were detected in the extracted oil, and total sulfur analysis gave a value of 25 ppm w/v.
E. Polishing Of Extracted Oxidized Oil With Solid Phase Adsorbant Media: A 100-ml sample of full range (FR) Hydrotreated (HT) Arabian Light Gas Oil (ALGO) containing 910 ppm w/w of total sulfur was oxidized and extracted exactly as in Example B. and C. above. The sample of oxidized and extracted oil was passed through a 2.5 cm diameter by 50 cm high fritted chromatography column containing 10 grams of Millipore Cyano Bonded solid phase extraction media. The effluent from the column was analyzed by GC-SCD and found to contain no detectable sulfur peaks. Sulfur analysis by Antek total sulfur gave a result of 8 ppm w/v.
F. Polishing Oxidized Extracted Oil by Alumina: The 100-ml sample of oxidized and extracted oil prepared in D. Countercurrent Extraction Of Oxidized Oil, was passed through a 2.5 cm diameter by 50 cm height fritted chromatography column containing 10 grams of Davidson Alumina. The effluent from the column was analyzed by GC-SCD and found to contain no detectable sulfur peaks. Sulfur analysis by Antek total sulfur gave a result of 5 ppm w/v.
Stefanio Bonsignore Catalyst Mo2W7O30.2N(CH2PO)3 (FW 2217.75)
A. Preparation of Bonsignore Catalyst: Weighed 3.54 grams (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O (FW 1235.86) 23.10 grams Na2WO4.2H2O (FW 329.86) into 250 ml beaker and added 100 ml distilled water. The solution contains 20 meq of molybdenum and 70 meq of tungsten. Stirred vigorously for 15 minutes until the solution became clear and colorless. Transferred 3 ml of the solution to a 20 ml vial. Added 1.0 ml of 30% hydrogen peroxide and mixed until a wine-red color developed. Added 2.00 ml of a 30% (1.0 M) solution (2.0 millimole) of amino-tris-methylenephosphonic acid (ATMP) N(CH2PO3H2)3 (MW 299.05). The solution quickly turned greenish-yellow.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: Prepared 100 ml of full range hydrotreated straight run diesel in a 400 ml beaker. Added 50 ml of 15% hydrogen peroxide and began heating and stirring. Added 25 mg of Tetradecyl Ammonium Bromide (TDAB) phase transfer catalyst. Added the 5.0 ml of prepared peroxo-molybdotungstate trisphosphonate catalyst into the oil-water-peroxide mixture. Continued heating to 80° C., then held between 80-100° C. for 40 minutes.
Oxidate mixture was cooled and transferred to a 250 ml separatory funnel. The lower aqueous layer was separated and discarded, and the oil layer was transferred to a 200 ml polyethylene bottle. A sample of the oil was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. All of the sulfur peaks were shifted to the sulfone region of the chromatogram. Apparent conversion is 100%.
Mere Te Catalyst Phosphomolybdic Acid H3PO4Mo12O36.XH2O (FW1825.25)
A. Preparation of Catalyst: Two grams of molybdic acid (Fisher MoO3 89.1%) was weighed into a 400 ml beaker. 40 ml distilled water was added. NaOH pellets 0.25 g were added and the mixture was stirred until all dissolved. Two grams of ammonium para-molybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O) was added and swirled with NaOH pellets 0.5 g added. This mixture was stirred for 10 minutes until all dissolved. 5.0 ml of 85% phosphoric acid was added and stirring continued. Then 3.0 ml of concentrated nitric acid was added, with continuous stirring. The solution gave a very faint yellow tinge.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: 100 ml of Hydrotreated Diesel was added to a 400 ml beaker. 50 ml of 15% hydrogen peroxide was added. Two ml of the catalyst solution above was added with stirring as the sample was heated. 50 mg of hexadecylpyridinium chloride (Aldrich) was added, and the solution was heated to 80° C. and held between 80-100° C. with vigorous stirring for 30 minutes. The sample was cooled and transferred to a 250 ml separatory funnel, and the lower aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The oil was transferred to a 200 ml polyethylene bottle, and was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. Approximately 20% of the sulfur peaks shifted to later retention times, indicating oxidation of benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes to their respective sulfones.
Wilfred Shum Catalyst MoO2NH(CHCH3CH2O)2 (FW 763.03)
A. Catalyst Preparation: Ammonium paramolybdate 17.7 grams (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O (FW 1235.86) was weighed into a 400 ml beaker and 125 ml distilled water was added. 40 ml of aqueous 40% diisopropanol amine (technical grade) was added with stirring. The solution was heated to 135° C. with stirring. A slow stream of air was bubbled through the solution as it was heated for eight hours.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: 100 ml of Hydrotreated Diesel was added to a 400 ml beaker. 50 ml of 15% hydrogen peroxide was added. Two ml of the catalyst solution above was added with stirring as the sample was heated. 50 mg of tetra-octyl ammonium bromide was added, and the solution was heated to 80° C. and held between 80-100° C. with vigorous stirring for 30 minutes. The sample was cooled and transferred to a 250 ml separatory funnel, and the lower aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The oil was transferred to a 200 ml polyethylene bottle, and was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. Approximately 10% of the sulfur peaks shifted to later retention times, indicating oxidation of benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes to their respective sulfones.
J. M. Campos-Martin Catalyst N(CH2PO)3 (WO5)9 (FW 2571.54)
A. Preparation of Catalyst: Sodium Tungstate Na2WO4.2H2O (3.0 grams) was dissolved in 10 ml of 30% hydrogen peroxide, to form a bright yellow solution. Three ml of a 30% solution of amino (tris) methylenephosphonic (N(CH2PO3H2)3 acid were added. The solution turned colorless immediately. This solution was diluted to 30 ml with distilled water.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: 100 ml of Hydrotreated Diesel was added to a 400 ml beaker. 50 ml of 15% hydrogen peroxide was added. Two ml of the catalyst solution above was added with stirring as the sample was heated. 50 mg of hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide was added, and the solution was heated to 80° C. and held between 80-100° C. with vigorous stirring for 30 minutes. The sample was cooled and transferred to a 250 ml separatory funnel, and the lower aqueous layer was removed and discarded.
The oil was transferred to a 200 ml polyethylene bottle, and was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. Approximately 90% of the sulfur peaks shifted to later retention times, indicating oxidation of benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes to their respective sulfones.
Changwen Hu H5BiMo12O40.4H2O (FW 2077.34)
A. Preparation of Catalyst: Bismuth nitrate 2.0 grams Bi(NO3)2.2H2O was dissolved in 50 ml of distilled water in a 250 ml beaker Concentrated nitric acid was added dropwise until the solution was complete. Ammonium paramolybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O 25.0 grams was weighed into a 400 ml beaker and was dissolved in 150 ml distilled water with vigorous stirring. A white precipitate formed immediately and was aged at 50° C. for 6 hours. The product was filtered, washed with distilled water, then dried overnite. The sample was broken up to powder and mixed, then calcined for 12 hours at 450° C.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: 100 ml of Hydrotreated Diesel was added to a 400 ml beaker. 50 ml of 15% hydrogen peroxide was added. 100 mg of the catalyst was added with stirring as the sample was heated. 50 mg of tetraoctyl ammonium bromide was added, and the solution was heated to 80° C. and held between 80-100° C. with vigorous stirring for 30 minutes. The sample was cooled and transferred to a 250 ml separatory funnel, and the lower aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The oil was transferred to a 200 ml polyethylene bottle, and was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. At least 95% of the sulfur peaks shifted to later retention times, indicating oxidation of benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes to their respective sulfones.
Mario Bressan Catalyst Na4C32H12N8S4O12Co(II)O2 (FW 1011.64)
A. Preparation of Catalyst: Commercial UOP Cobalt Sulfophthalocyanine (Merox Catalyst) 0.50 g was dissolved in 100 ml 10% NaOH to prepare a 5000 ppm stock catalyst solution. 4.0 ml of the catalyst solution was added to 36 ml of an aqueous solution 3.8625% KHSO5 potassium monopersulfate (0.25 Molar) Mallinkrodt. The catalyst solution was placed in a vial until used for oxidation. Final concentrations of the catalyst solution are 500 ppm of cobalt sulfophthalocyanine and 0.225M in potassium monopersulfate.
B. Oxidation and Analysis of Oil: 100 ml of Hydrotreated Diesel was added to a 500-ml Erlenmeyer flask, and a condenser was fitted to the flask. 40 ml of the catalyst-monopersulfate solution was added. 60 ml of acetonitrile was added with stirring as the sample was heated. The mixture was heated to 83° C. and held between 80-100° C. with total reflux and vigorous stirring for 3 hours. The sample was cooled at 5° C. for two hours, and the two phases were separated. The contents of the Erlenmeyer flask were transferred to a 250-ml separatory funnel, and the lower aqueous-acetonitrile layer was removed and discarded. The oil was transferred to a 200-ml polyethylene bottle, and was analyzed by Sievers GC-SCD. Approximately 50% of the sulfur peaks were removed from the oil and some were shifted to later retention times, indicating oxidation of benzothiophenes and dibenzothiophenes to their respective sulfones. Approximately half of the sulfur was removed from the oil and transferred to the acetonitrile-water phase.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2253308 | Rosen | Aug 1941 | A |
| 2593761 | Johnstone | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2671049 | Brown | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2697682 | Porter | Dec 1954 | A |
| 2834717 | Shiah | May 1958 | A |
| 3284342 | Nathan et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3341448 | Ford et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3565793 | Herbstman et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3595778 | Smetana et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3719589 | Herbstman et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3816301 | Sorgenti | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3945914 | Yoo et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4088569 | Douglas | May 1978 | A |
| 4562276 | Venturello et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4595671 | Venturello et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4607113 | Shum et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4731482 | Venturello et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4772731 | Shum et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 5017280 | Paris-Marcano | May 1991 | A |
| 5087350 | Paris-Marcano | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5274140 | Venturello et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5310479 | Audeh | May 1994 | A |
| 5324849 | Bonsignore et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5547563 | Stowe | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5780655 | Shum | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5847120 | Collins et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5948242 | Ohsol et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958224 | Ho et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961820 | Jeanblanc et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5985137 | Ohsol et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6054580 | Collins et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6160193 | Gore | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171478 | Cabrera et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6274785 | Gore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277271 | Kocal | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6368495 | Kocal et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6402938 | Moore et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402939 | Yen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402940 | Rappas | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406616 | Rappas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6485633 | Wismann et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6500219 | Gunnerman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503471 | Han et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6544409 | De Souza | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6565741 | Wismann et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6596914 | Gore et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6638419 | Da Silva et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6652992 | Gunnerman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6673236 | Stanciulescu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 7314545 | Karas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 20020029997 | Rappas et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035306 | Gore et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020043482 | Wismann et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130062 | Wismann et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144932 | Gong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020148754 | Gong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020148756 | Morris et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020189975 | De Souza | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014911 | Gunnerman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051988 | Gunnerman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075483 | Stanciulescu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030102252 | Rabion et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183555 | Corma Canos et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040007501 | Sughrue et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040007502 | Wismann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040035753 | Cullen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040074812 | Cullen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040079680 | Gunnerman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108252 | De Souza | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118750 | Gong et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140247 | Canos et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154959 | Schoebrechts et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159583 | Mesters et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170553 | Axon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178121 | Leyshon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178122 | Karas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040200759 | Cullen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040222131 | Cullen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20070051667 | Martinie et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0015734 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070051667 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
