Particulate filters are employed in internal combustion engine exhaust systems where particulate escape to the environment is not desirable. One such system is that of a diesel exhaust system. In such system, a combustion source produces some particulate matter and that matter is filtered out of the exhaust gas stream from that combustion source before exhaust gas therefrom is released to atmosphere or another system. The hydrocarbon particulate is periodically removed by means of a high temperature regeneration process that is controlled by the vehicle engine computer, and that occurs when needed, automatically while the vehicle is in use. In addition to the hydrocarbon particulate matter other contaminants, such as zinc dithiophosphate, from the engine lubricating oil, and cerium, which is sometimes added to the fuel to aid regeneration, is trapped in the filter system. Since the automatic regeneration process does not remove these materials, they gradually plug the pores in the filter. Such particulate filter systems lose efficiency with usage due to contaminate, and additive particulate matter buildup. Arrangements and methods associated with the reduction of costs and time involved in cleaning and/or replacement of such particulate filters is desirable.
Disclosed herein is a method for reducing contaminate, and additive particulate matter in a diesel particulate filter, including accessing the filter and entraining contaminate, and additive particulate matter in a fluid stream.
Further disclosed herein is a diesel particulate filter system including a canister, a filter media mounted in said canister and an access opening in said canister.
Yet further disclosed herein is a low cost particulate filter system having access for particulate removal, the system including a canister, a filter mounted in the canister, a flange retainer without a seal and a sleeve disposed in said canister and configured to inhibit particulate leakage from and flange retainer.
Still further disclosed herein is a low cost particulate filter system having access for contaminate, and additive particulate removal including a canister, a sub canister positionable in said canister, a filter mounted in said sub canister and a single flange retainer closing said canister and mounting said sub canister.
Yet still further disclosed herein is a method for determining condition of a particulate filter in situ including establishing a vacuum value for a clean particulate filter in situ, establishing a vacuum value for a used particulate filter in situ; and comparing the established value for the clean filter versus the used filter.
The present invention will now be described, by way of an example, with references to the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several figures in which:
It is to be appreciated that although several of the drawing figures herein include a catalyst substrate, this is for contextual purposes and for one embodiment of the invention as disclosed herein. It is not germane to that which is claimed whether or not the catalyst substrate is illustrated or included in the canister in which the filter is supported. If the drawings were modified to omit the catalyst, the function and construction of that disclosed herein will remain unchanged. Notwithstanding the foregoing, some of the drawings do include the catalyst substrate as one embodiment of the invention as it is employed with a diesel catalytic converter and particulate filter system.
Further, it is noted that a catalyst substrate can in some conditions trap particulate matter and in such condition be, in effect, a filter. For this reason, it is to be understood that the device and method described herein can be used to remove particulate matter from a catalyst in the same way as described for a filter hereafter.
Referring to
In an alternate embodiment, one of the flange pairs 8 is completely eliminated. Additionally, and as a consequence of elimination of one of the flange pairs, canister section 14b has also been eliminated. Canister section 14a and 14c remain, in slightly distinct dimensions from the previous embodiment. In this embodiment, (
Referring to
In yet another embodiment, referring to
Each of the foregoing embodiments allows access to the filter 20 for removal, repositioning, cleaning, replacement, etc. These are desirable attributes and are less expensive than prior art configurations but do still require relatively costly hardware.
Alternately, referring to
Opening 72 is closeable by a plug which may be of a number of different types. One type of plug employable is a sheet metal fill plug 74 (detail views are available in
In one embodiment (
Referring back to
With negative pressure conduit 102 inserted into conduit 70 (
Alternatively, still referring to
Alternatively, still referring to
The method discussed herein is benefited by a knowledge of when the filter 20 which is in need of cleaning, and has been sufficiently cleaned. This can be accomplished by the manufacturer of the target system by providing a “known clean” negative pressure numerical value at opening 72. This value is employable to determine how “plugged” the filter 20 is by connecting a vacuum gauge to the downstream end of the system and removing plug 74 from opening 72. A numerical value of vacuum is then obtainable based upon a fixed negative pressure. If the vacuum numerical value is larger than “known clean” then particulate matter has impeded flow through filter 20. A threshold value would also be provided by the manufacture of the system for a cleaning action as described above. The manufacture would also provide a means of calibrating such a system so that it would be useable with the varying amount of flow induced by various vacuum sources. Likewise, after a cleaning operation, the vacuum gauge may again be connected to test the effect the cleaning operation has had. It should be understood that in at least some of the foregoing embodiments, plug 76 would need to be reinstalled prior to testing. This testing operation, whether before or after cleaning, is schematically illustrated in
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a U.S. non-provisional application based upon and claiming priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/359,971 filed Feb. 27, 2002 and 60/363,776 filed Mar. 13, 2002, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3696619 | Rosa | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3712029 | Charlton | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3738089 | Brill | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3824769 | Santos et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 4373330 | Stark | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4419108 | Frost et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4419113 | Smith | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4466816 | Felker | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4503672 | Stark et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4531363 | Ludecke et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4535588 | Sato et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4571938 | Sakurai | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4573317 | Ludecke | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4864821 | Hoch | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5063736 | Hough et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5272874 | Paas | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5388400 | Hoppenstedt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5397550 | Marino, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5566545 | Hijikata et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 6230494 | Botti et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6423896 | Keegan | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6485852 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6500574 | Keegan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509113 | Keegan | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6551734 | Simpkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562496 | Faville et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6608463 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6609582 | Botti et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613468 | Simpkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6613469 | Keegan | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620535 | Mukerjee et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4313132 | Oct 1994 | DE |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030159436 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60359971 | Feb 2002 | US | |
| 60363776 | Mar 2002 | US |