Difference drive diversity antenna structure and method

Abstract
A difference drive diversity antenna structure (200) and method for a portable wireless communication device (230) aligns a first linear antenna (240) parallel to a major axis (245) of the communication device and drives dual radiators (252, 254) of a second antenna (250) at equal magnitudes but with a 180 degree phase difference. A difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented in a portable wireless communication device maintains significant decorrelation between the first antenna (240) and the second antenna (250) over the common frequency ranges of the dual radiators (252, 254). Also, antenna currents on the body of the communication device are minimized and the effects of a hand or body near the communication device are reduced.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to antenna structures, and more particularly to producing a sufficiently high decorrelation between two antennas that are in close proximity such that the diversity reception performance is maintained.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Portable wireless communication devices such as radiotelephones sometimes use one or more antennas to transmit and receive radio frequency signals. In a radiotelephone using two antennas, the second antenna should have comparable performance with respect to the first, or main, antenna and should also have sufficient decorrelation with respect to the first antenna so that the performance of the two antennas is not degraded when both antennas are operating. Antenna performance is a combination of many parameters. A sufficient operating frequency bandwidth, a high radiation efficiency, and a desirable radiation pattern characteristic, and a low correlation, are all desired components of antenna performance. Correlation is computed as the normalized covariance of the radiation patterns of the two antennas. Due to the dimensions and generally-accepted placement of a main antenna along the major axis of a device such as a hand-held radiotelephone, however, efficiency and decorrelation goals are extremely difficult to achieve.





FIG. 1

shows a prior art two-antenna structure implemented in a hand-held radiotelephone


130


. A first antenna


140


is a retractable linear antenna. When the first antenna is fully-extended, as shown, the length of the first antenna is a quarter wavelength of the frequency of interest. Note that the first antenna


140


is aligned parallel to the major axis


145


of the radiotelephone


130


and has a vertical polarization with respect to the ground


190


.




The radiotelephone


130


also has a microstrip patch antenna as a second antenna


150


attached to a printed circuit board inside the radiotelephone


130


and aligned parallel to a minor axis


155


of the radiotelephone


130


to send or receive signals having a horizontal polarization with respect to the ground


190


. In isolation, the second antenna


150


may well produce horizontally polarized signals, but when the second antenna


150


is attached to the printed circuit board and in the proximity of the first antenna


140


, the polarization of the second antenna


150


reorients along the major axis


145


of the radiotelephone


130


. As the polarization of the second antenna reorients, the first antenna


140


and second antenna


150


become highly correlated and many of the advantages of the two-antenna structure are lost. Commonly, a prior art two-antenna structure implemented in a radiotelephone has a correlation factor of over 0.8 between the two antennas. Effective diversity operation requires a correlation factor of less than 0.6 between the two antennas.




The reorientation of the polarization of the signals from the second antenna


150


is due to various factors, including the fact that hand-held radiotelephones typically has major axis


145


and the minor axis


155


dimensions with an aspect ratio greater than 2:1 and that the major dimension of the radiotelephone is significant with respect to the wavelength of operation while the other dimensions of the radiotelephone are small with respect to this wavelength. Additionally, because the minor dimension of the radiotelephone is small with respect to the wavelength of interest, the second antenna


150


is easily perturbed and detuned, which creates susceptibility to effects of the hand or head of a user


110


on antenna efficiency.




Thus there is a need for a two-antenna structure that maintains decorrelation and efficiency between a first antenna aligned along a major axis of a portable wireless communication device and a second antenna.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a prior art two-antenna structure implemented in a radiotelephone.





FIG. 2

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented according to a first preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone.





FIG. 3

shows a radiation pattern for the E


θ


polarization of the first antenna shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

shows the radiation pattern for the E


φ


polarization of the second antenna shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 5

shows the radiation pattern for the E


θ


polarization of the second antenna shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 6

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented according to a second preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone.





FIG. 7

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented according to a third preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone.





FIG. 8

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented according to a fourth preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A difference drive diversity antenna structure and method for a portable wireless communication device aligns a first linear antenna parallel to a major axis of the communication device and drives dual radiators of a second antenna at equal magnitudes but with a 180 degree phase difference. A difference drive diversity antenna structure implemented in a portable wireless communication device maintains significant decorrelation between the first antenna and the second antenna over the common frequency ranges of the dual radiators. Also, antenna currents on the body of the communication device are minimized and the effects of a hand or body near the communication device are reduced.





FIG. 2

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure


200


implemented according to a first preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone


230


. A first antenna


240


, such as a retractable linear wire antenna, is aligned parallel to the major axis


245


of a radiotelephone


230


. This axis will be considered the z-axis. When the first antenna


240


is fully-extended, as shown, the length of the antenna is a quarter wavelength of a frequency of interest. During operation, the first antenna


240


produces signals that are vertically polarized with respect to the major axis, which would lie in the xy-plane.




A second antenna


250


has dual radiators


252


,


254


connected by a common leg


275


. The common leg


275


is coupled to the circuit board


270


for grounding purposes. In this embodiment, each radiator is each a conventional quarter wavelength slot implemented in conductive surface that is also grounded to the circuit board


270


. The first radiator


252


is aligned along one edge of a circuit board


270


of the radiotelephone


230


parallel to the major axis


245


and the second radiator


254


is aligned along an opposite edge of the circuit board


270


. Although the radiators need not be placed at opposite edges of the circuit board


270


, as the separation distance between the two radiators increases, the performance of the second antenna


250


increases.




The two radiator


252


,


254


are drive 180 degrees out of phase but at the same magnitude using a single differential port for each radiator. A phase shifter


260


, such as a balun or transmission line, is used to create the driving signals for each radiator


252


,


254


. At the frequency ranges that are common to the individual radiators


252


,


254


, differentially driving the two radiators


252


,


254


of the second antenna


250


creates E


θ


and E


φ


components of electric field vectors in the xy-plane that are orthogonal to the E


θ


components of the first antenna


240


. The first antenna


240


produces predominantly E


θ


components of electric field vectors so that there is virtually no correlation with the E


φ


components of the second antenna


250


because E


θ


and E


φ


are orthogonal polarizations. All combinations of orthogonal polarizations are entirely and completely decorrelated so that they have zero covariance and therefore zero contribution to the correlation factor.




The only significant contribution to the correlation between the first antenna


240


and the second antenna


250


is the E


θ


component of the radiation pattern of both antennas


240


,


250


when they occur in common angular regions. The phenomena that minimize the correlation is best understood by examining the radiation patterns of the two antennas.





FIG. 3

shows a radiation pattern


300


for the E


θ


polarization of the first antenna


240


shown in FIG.


2


. The axes of the radiation pattern are aligned according to the axes shown in FIG.


2


. At a given radius r from the phone, the magnitude of the θ component of the electric field E from the first antenna


240


is shown. The magnitude of the E


θ


radiation pattern is expressed in terms of distance from the origin, i.e., the farther the pattern is from the origin, the stronger the radiation component. The E


θ


radiation pattern


300


generally has a shape of a toroid oriented in the xy-plane. In other words, the E


θ


pattern shows negligible E


θ


radiation components along the z-axis. The radiation pattern for the E


φ


polarization of the first antenna


240


shown in

FIG. 2

is negligible.





FIG. 4

shows the radiation pattern


400


for the E


φ


polarization of the second antenna


250


shown in FIG.


2


. The axes of the radiation pattern are aligned according to the axes shown in FIG.


2


. At a given radius r from the phone, the magnitude of the φ component of the electric field E from the second antenna


250


is shown. The magnitude of the E


φ


radiation pattern is expressed in terms of distance from the origin, i.e., the farther the pattern is from the origin, the stronger the radiation component. The E


φ


radiation pattern


400


generally has a shape of two bulbous lobes mirrored by the xz-plane. In other words, the E


φ


pattern shows negligible E


φ


radiation components in the xz-plane. On the other hand, the figure-8-shaped major axis


450


of the radiation pattern


400


peaks along the y-axis. These peaks would correspond physically to the “front” or keypad side and the “back” or battery side of the radiotelephone


250


shown in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 5

shows the radiation pattern


500


for the E


θ


polarization of the second antenna


250


shown in FIG.


2


. The axes of the radiation pattern are aligned according to the axes shown in FIG.


2


. At a given radius r from the phone, the magnitude of the θ component of the electric field E from the second antenna


250


is shown. The magnitude of the E


θ


radiation pattern is expressed in terms of distance from the origin, i.e., the farther the pattern is from the origin, the stronger the radiation component. The E


θ


radiation pattern


500


generally has a shape of two bulbous lobes mirrored by the yz-plane. In other words, the E


θ


pattern shows negligible E


θ


radiation components in the yz-plane. On the other hand, the figure-8-shaped major axis


550


of the pattern


500


has peaks along the x-axis. These peaks would correspond physically to the “left” side and the “right” side of the radiotelephone


250


shown in FIG.


2


.




The most significant E


θ


radiation that contributes to correlation occurs in the xy-plane. The first dipole antenna patterns shown in

FIG. 3

are circles showing uniform magnitude and phase response. The second antenna pattern shown in

FIG. 5

is figure-8-shaped with two lobes of equal size and opposite phase. The multiplication and integration of these two patterns of response result in zero covariance and therefore zero correlation. The other planes, the xz-plane and the yz-plane, show similar calculation results. Slight departures from this idealized geometry result in small components rather than the zero components described above. In a practical implementation very low, but not zero correlation, is easily achieved.




Thus, even with the first antenna


240


operating in close proximity to the second antenna


250


, the two antennas


240


,


250


have a low correlation. Performance tests have shown that the correlation between the two antennas


240


,


250


are well below the 0.6 correlation goal.




Other difference drive diversity antenna structures can also produce the highly decorrelated radiation patterns shown in FIGS.


3


-


5


.

FIG. 6

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure


600


implemented according to a second preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone


630


. In this embodiment F antenna structures are used in the radiators


652


,


654


instead of the quarter wavelength slot antennas shown in FIG.


2


. This allows operation of the difference drive diversity antenna structure


600


in more than one frequency band.




A first antenna


640


, such as a retractable linear wire antenna, is aligned parallel to the major axis


645


of a radiotelephone


630


. This axis will be considered the z-axis. When the first antenna


640


is fully-extended, as shown, the length of the antenna is a quarter wavelength of a frequency of interest. During operation, the first antenna


640


produces signals that are vertically polarized (E


θ


) with respect to the major axis, which would lie in the xy-plane.




A second antenna


650


has dual radiators


652


,


654


. In this embodiment, each radiator


652


,


654


has a pair of inverted F-antennas


651


,


653


;


657


,


658


. One pair of inverted F antennas


651


,


658


is tuned to a lower frequency band, and another pair of inverted F antennas


653


,


657


is tuned to a higher frequency band. The common leg


675


of the four inverted F antennas is coupled to the circuit board


670


for grounding purposes. By slightly changing the geometry of the common leg


675


, the inverted F antenna configuration can be easily replaced by a towelbar antenna configuration. For the inverted F antenna configuration, the first radiator


652


is aligned along one edge of a circuit board


670


of the radiotelephone


630


parallel to the major axis


645


and the second radiator


654


is aligned along an opposite edge of the circuit board


670


. Although the radiators need not be placed at opposite edges of the circuit board


670


, as the separation distance between the two radiators increases, the performance of the second antenna


650


increases.




The two radiators


652


,


654


are driven 180 degrees out of phase but at the same magnitude using a single differential port for each radiator. A phase shifter


660


, such as a balun or transmission line, is used to create the driving signals for each radiator


652


,


654


. At the frequency ranges that are common to the individual radiators


652


,


654


, differentially driving the two radiators


652


,


654


of the second antenna


650


creates E


φ


and E


θ


components of the electric field vectors in the xy-plane that are decorrelated to the E


θ


components of the first antenna


640


as previous described. The E


φ


components of the first antenna


640


are negligible. Thus, even with the first antenna


640


operating in close proximity to the second antenna


650


, the two antennas


640


,


650


have a low correlation. Performance tests have shown that the correlation between the two antennas


240


,


250


is well below the performance goal of 0.6.





FIG. 7

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure


750


implemented according to a third preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone


730


. In this embodiment multi-band slot antenna structures, such as those disclosed in “Multi-Band Slot Antenna Structure and Method” by Louis J. Vannatta and Hugh K. Smith (Attorney Docket No. CE01548R), are used in radiators


752


,


754


instead of the quarter wavelength slot antennas shown in FIG.


2


. Like the inverted F antenna structures, this allows operation of the difference drive diversity antenna structure


700


in more than one frequency band. Also, in this embodiment, the radiators


752


,


754


are aligned parallel to the minor axis of the radiotelephone


230


.




A first antenna


740


, such as a retractable linear wire antenna, is aligned parallel to the major axis


745


of a radiotelephone


730


. This axis will be considered the z-axis. When the first antenna


740


is fully-extended, as shown, the length of the antenna is a quarter wavelength of a frequency of interest. During operation, the first antenna


740


produces signals that are vertically polarized with respect to the major axis, which would lie in the xy-plane.




A second antenna


750


has dual radiators


752


,


754


. In this embodiment, each radiator


752


,


754


has a pair of quarter wavelength slot antennas


751


,


753


;


757


,


758


implemented in a conductive surface. The common leg


775


of the four slot antennas is coupled to the circuit board


770


for grounding purposes. One pair of slot antennas


751


,


758


is tuned to a lower frequency band, and another pair of slot antennas


753


,


757


is tuned to a higher frequency band. In this embodiment, the first radiator


752


is aligned along one edge of a circuit board


770


of the radiotelephone


730


parallel to the minor axis


755


and the second radiator


754


is aligned along an opposite edge of the circuit board


770


. Although the radiators need not be placed at opposite edges of the circuit board


770


, as the separation distance between the two radiators increases, the performance of the second antenna


750


increases. In many cases, the increased maximum separation allowed by aligning of the radiators


752


,


754


parallel to the minor axis


755


will increase the performance of the difference drive diversity antenna structure.




The two radiators


752


,


754


are driven 180 degrees out of phase but at the same magnitude using a signal differential port for each radiator. A phase shifter


760


, such as a balun or transmission line, is used to create the driving signals for each radiator


752


,


754


. At the frequency ranges that are common to the individual radiators


752


,


754


, differentially driving the two radiators


752


,


754


of the second antenna


750


creates E


φ


and E


θ


components of the electric field vectors in the xy-plane that are decorrelated to the E


θ


components of the first antenna


740


. The E


φ


components of the first antenna


740


are negligible. Thus, even with the first antenna


740


operating in close proximity to the second antenna


750


, the two antennas


740


,


750


have a low correlation.





FIG. 8

shows a simplified diagram of a difference drive diversity antenna structure


800


implemented according to a fourth preferred embodiment in a radiotelephone


830


. In this embodiment, multi-layered compact slot antenna structures, such as those disclosed in “Multi-Layered Compact Slot Antenna Structure and Method” by David R. Haub, Louis J. Vannatta, and Hugh K. Smith (Attorney Docket No. CE01551R), are used in radiators


852


,


854


instead of the quarter wavelength slot antennas shown in FIG.


2


. Many other antenna structures, such as helices, patches, loops, and dipoles, can also be used in place of the disclosed structures.




A first antenna


840


, such as a retractable linear wire antenna, is aligned parallel to the major axis


845


of a radiotelephone


830


. This axis will be considered the z-axis. When the first antenna


840


is fully-extended, as shown, the length of the antenna is a quarter wavelength of a frequency of interest. During operation, the first antenna


840


produces signals that are vertically polarized with respect to the major axis, which would lie in the xy-plane.




A second antenna


850


has dual radiators


852


,


854


. In this embodiment, each radiator


852


,


854


has a pair of multi-layer compact slot antennas


851


,


853


;


857


,


858


implemented using two conductive layers sandwiching a dielectric layer. The common leg


875


of the four slot antennas is coupled to the circuit board


870


for grounding purposes. One pair of multi-layered compact slot antennas


851


,


858


is tuned to a lower frequency band, and another pair of multi-layered compact slot antennas


853


,


857


is tuned to a higher frequency band. In this embodiment, the first radiator


852


is aligned along one edge of a circuit board


870


of the radio-telephone


830


parallel to the major axis


855


and the second radiator


854


is aligned along an opposite edge of the circuit board


870


. Although the radiators need not be placed at opposite edges of the circuit board


870


, as the separation distance between the two radiators increases, the performance of the second antenna


850


increases.




The two radiators


852


,


854


are driven 180 degrees out of phase but at the same magnitude using a single differential port for each radiator. A phase shifter


860


, such as a balun or transmission line, is used to create the driving signals for each radiator


852


,


854


. At the frequency ranges that are common to the individual radiators


852


,


854


, differentially driving the two radiators


852


,


854


of the second antenna


850


creates E


φ


and E


θ


components of the electric field vectors in the xy-plane that are decorrelated to the E


θ


components of the first antenna


840


. The E


φ


components of the first antenna


840


are negligible. Thus, even with the first antenna


840


operating in close proximity to the second antenna


850


, the first antennas


840


,


850


have a low correlation.




Thus the difference drive diversity antenna structure maintains high levels of decorrelation between a first antenna and a second antenna implemented in a portable wireless communication device. This allows for high antenna performance even when the two antennas are operated in close proximity to each other and a circuit board. This also reduces antenna currents on the body of the device. While specific components and functions of the difference drive diversity antenna structure are described above, fewer or additional functions could be employed by one skilled in the art within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. The invention should be limited only by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A difference drive diversity antenna structure comprising:a first antenna, having a radiation pattern with a first polarization; a second antenna, proximate to the first antenna, having a first radiating element with a radiation pattern having a second polarization and a second radiating element with a radiation pattern having a third polarization; and a phase shifter, for differentially driving the first radiating element out of phase relative to the second radiating element such that a correlation between an overall polarization of a radiation pattern of the second antenna and the first polarization is less than 0.6, and a correlation between the overall polarization of the radiation pattern of the second antenna and the second polarization is less than 0.6.
  • 2. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein a correlation between the second polarization and the first polarization is less than 0.6
  • 3. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 2 wherein a correlation between the third polarization and the first polarization is less than 0.6.
  • 4. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein a correlation between the second polarization and the first polarization is greater than 0.6.
  • 5. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 4 wherein a correlation between the third polarization and the first polarization is greater than 0.6
  • 6. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 where a correlation between the overall polarization of the radiation pattern of the second antenna and the third polarization is less than 0.6
  • 7. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the phase shifter differentially drives the first radiating element 180 degrees out of phase relative to the second radiating element.
  • 8. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the phase shifter differentially drives the first radiating element and the second radiating element at the same magnitude.
  • 9. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the phase shifter is a balun.
  • 10. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the phase shifter is a transmission line.
  • 11. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the first radiating element comprises:a slot tuned to a first frequency band.
  • 12. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 11 wherein the second radiating element comprises:a slot tuned to the first frequency band.
  • 13. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the first radiating element comprises:an inverted F structure having a leg and a radiator tuned to a first frequency band.
  • 14. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 13 wherein the second radiating element comprises:an inverted F structure having a leg and a radiator tuned to the first frequency band.
  • 15. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 1 wherein the first radiating element comprises:a multi-layer compact slot tuned to a first frequency band.
  • 16. A difference drive diversity antenna structure according to claim 15 wherein the second radiating element comprises:a multi-layer compact slot tuned to the first frequency band.
  • 17. A radiotelephone comprising:a first antenna, aligned parallel to a major axis of the radiotelephone, having a radiation pattern with a first polarization; a second antenna, having a first radiating element with a radiation pattern having a second polarization and a second radiating element with a radiation pattern having a third polarization; and a phase shifter, for differentially driving the first radiating element out of phase relative to the second radiating element such that a correlation between an overall polarization of a radiation pattern of the second antenna and the first polarization is less than 0.6, and a correlation between the overall polarization of the radiation pattern of the second antenna and the second polarization is less than 0.6
  • 18. A radiotelephone according to claim 17 wherein the first radiating element is driven 180 degrees out of phase relative to the second radiating element.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/853,772 filed May 9, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,977,916. This application is related to application Ser. No. 08/854,197 entitled “Multi-Layered Compact Slot Antenna Structure and Method” by David R. Haub, Louis J. Vannatta, and Hugh K. Smith (Attorney Docket No. CE01551R) filed same date herewith, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to application Ser. No. 08/854,272 entitled “Multi-Band Slot antenna Structure and Method” by Louis J. Vannatta and Hugh K. Smith (Attorney Docket No. CE01548R) filed same date herewith, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference. This application is based on prior U.S. application Ser. No. 08/853,772, filed on May 9, 1997, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and priority thereto for common subject matter is hereby claimed.

US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
3631500 Itoh Dec 1971
4575725 Tresselt Mar 1986
4613868 Weiss Sep 1986
5038151 Kaminski Aug 1991
5138328 Zibrik et al. Aug 1992
5274388 Ishizaki et al. Dec 1993
5463406 Vannatta et al. Oct 1995
5606733 Kanayama et al. Feb 1997
5760745 Endo et al. Jun 1998
5764190 Murch et al. Jun 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0 036 139 A2 Sep 1981 EP
0 749 216 A1 Dec 1996 EP
WO 8502719 Jun 1985 WO
WO 9102386 Feb 1991 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Diversity Antennas For Base and Mobile Stations in Land Mobile Communication Systems, by Yoshihide Yamada, Kenichi Kagoshima, and Kouichi Tsunikawa, IEICE Transactions, vol. E 74, No. 10, Oct. 1991.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/853772 May 1997 US
Child 09/286823 US