Patent Application
20090300487
The present invention generally relates to the field of document checking and more particularly to a document utility capable of selectively allowing authors the option of either checking only a portion of a document changed from a previous point in time or checking only those portions of a document original to a particular author.
When responding to an email, in the body of the text of the original email, spell checkers force users to check the spelling of the original text in addition to any newly updated text. This takes time and increases the level of tedium since the email author is likely not concerned with the spelling of previous emails contained within an email string.
Further, in other instances of shared document communication or preparation, where multiple authors are involved, authors should be provided the convenience and utility associated with a system capable of providing authors the option of only checking the accuracy of their authorship. This reduces document/communication time and prevents authors from making non-substantive changes to other author's writings. Additionally, it places the responsibility of accuracy on each author.
When an email or document is opened for update, the original text of the document or email is preserved so a spell check request can utilize a difference of the original document and the changes. Thus, only freshly or newly modified, or modified since, portions are analyzed. In one embodiment the text checking tool performs a difference spell check (newly changed and/or added text). It will be recognized that the present invention may be utilized with any text checking utility, e.g., grammar and the like checkers.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not necessarily restrictive of the present disclosure. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate subject matter of the disclosure. Together, the descriptions and the drawings serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The numerous advantages of the disclosure may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the subject matter disclosed, which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
In operation, the system of the present invention, as illustrated in
Referring now to
Text checking devices including spell and grammar checkers may be employed by the present invention. In operation, for example, a document prepared by another may include a marker indicating the document's text check status, i.e., checked or not checked, what portions have been checked, what portions have not been checked (including visual indication means), spelling only, grammar and spelling only or the like. A document to be altered is preserved as opened (received) and the edit difference is text checked upon user request or user selectable automatically checked prior to sending saving. A menu may be employed allowing a user optionally to not check unauthored portions or the like.
The present invention may also be utilized to text check only those portions of a document that have changed since a previous text check or edit. Thus, under this secondary embodiment the text check may be selectively employed after a point in time regardless of the number of authors or changes made in a time interval. In this fashion, where an author changes a document on Monday and sends the document out for collaboration, and where the document returns with other author input (changes) on Thursday, and the original author makes changes on that Thursday, the present invention may allow the original author to selectively text check back to a specific point in time, e.g., Monday.
In the present disclosure, the methods disclosed may be implemented as sets of instructions or software readable by a device. Further, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the methods disclosed are examples of exemplary approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the method can be rearranged while remaining within the disclosed subject matter. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various steps in a sample order, and are not necessarily meant to be limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.
It is believed that the present disclosure and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components without departing from the disclosed subject matter or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form described is merely explanatory, and it is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
