Patent Grant
8954844
1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is data processing, or, more specifically, methods, systems, and products for differential dynamic content delivery with text display in dependence upon sound level.
2. Description of Related Art
Multimedia presentations through conferencing systems are becoming more common, but they are inflexible because all conference participants must be presented with exactly the same content. For any particular presentation, however, there is typically a wide variety of participant interest, company, group, or department membership, technical knowledge, security authorization, and so on, across almost any dimension in which participants may vary. Targeting content for such a heterogeneous set of users is typically a manual process today in which presenters create wholly separate presentations for each audience, and the content of each such presentation is reduced to the lowest common denominator of any particular audience. There is a substantial need for improved multimedia presentation systems.
Methods, systems, and products are disclosed that operate generally to support improved multimedia presentations by creating a presentation document that includes a content-specific presentation grammar and a structured document. The structured document typically has structural elements such as pages, paragraphs, cells, titles, and the like marked with structural identifiers. A content-specific presentation grammar ties presentation actions to the document structure through these structural element identifiers. A presentation actions directs the presentation of a document such as by moving the presentation to the next page of the document, the previous paragraph of the document and so on. A presentation grammar empowers a presenter to invoke the presentation actions using speech.
In typical embodiments, users are assigned classifications describing any attributes of a user, company name, department name, age, gender, technical knowledge, educational level, subject matters of personal interest, security authorization, and so on. Contents of structural elements from structured documents are then filtered for presentation to individual users in a multi-media, multi-user presentation according to the individual attributes of the participants.
In a presentation regarding marketing of a deep space vehicle for a Mars mission, for example, graphic images and paragraphs of text may be developed in many versions, inserted into the same presentation document with each version classified according to technical level, security level, and so on, so that a member of the marketing department viewing the same paragraph at the same time in the same presentation as a member of the research department will in fact be shown a different version of the paragraph. A graphic diagram of a subsystem presented to the marketer will be a simpler version than the one shown at the same time to the researcher.
More particularly, methods systems, and computer program products are provided for differential dynamic content delivery including providing a session document for a presentation, wherein the session document includes a session grammar and a session structured document; selecting from the session structured document a classified structural element in dependence upon user classifications of a user participant in the presentation; presenting the selected structural element to the user; streaming speech to the user from one or more users participating in the presentation; converting the speech to text; detecting a total sound level for the user; and determining whether to display the text in dependence upon the total sound level for the user. In some embodiments, the total sound level for the user includes ambient noise. Such embodiments include detecting an ambient noise level for the user. In typical embodiments, detecting an ambient noise level for the user further includes temporarily interrupting the speech streaming to the user and measuring a sound level on the user's voice channel during the interruption and while the user is not speaking.
Typical embodiments include displaying the text to the user if the ambient noise level is above a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the total sound level includes the streaming speech plus ambient noise. Such embodiments typically include determining whether to display the text further includes determining whether to display the text in dependence upon a ratio of the total sound level to the ambient noise level. Typical embodiments include displaying the text if the ratio of the total sound level to the ambient noise level is less than a predetermined minimum.
In many embodiments, selecting a classified structural element further includes selecting a classified structural element having an associated classification identifier that corresponds to the user classification. Some embodiments also include creating a session document from a presentation document including: identifying a presentation document for a presentation, the presentation document including a presentation grammar and a structured document having structural elements classified with classification identifiers; identifying a user participant for the presentation, the user having a user profile including user classifications; and filtering the structured document in dependence upon the user classifications and the classification identifiers. Many embodiments include filtering the presentation grammar, in dependence upon the extracted structural elements, into a session grammar in the session document.
Typical embodiments also include creating a presentation document, including: creating, in dependence upon an original document, a structured document including one or more structural elements; classifying a structural element of the structured document according to a presentation attribute; and creating a presentation grammar for the structured document, wherein the presentation grammar for the structured document includes grammar elements each of which includes an identifier for at least one structural element of the structured document. In many embodiments, classifying a structural element includes: identifying a presentation attribute for the structural element; identifying a classification identifier in dependence upon the presentation attribute; and inserting the classification identifier in association with the structural element in the structured document. In typical embodiments, creating a presentation grammar for the structured document includes: identifying the content type of the original document; selecting, in dependence upon the content type, a full presentation grammar from among a multiplicity of full presentation grammars; and filtering the full presentation grammar into a presentation grammar for the structured document in dependence upon the structural elements of the structured document.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular descriptions of exemplary embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally represent like parts of exemplary embodiments of the invention.
The present invention is described to a large extent in this specification in terms of methods for differential dynamic content delivery with text display in dependence upon sound level. Persons skilled in the art, however, will recognize that any computer system that includes suitable programming means for operating in accordance with the disclosed methods also falls well within the scope of the present invention. Suitable programming means include any means for directing a computer system to execute the steps of the method of the invention, including for example, systems comprised of processing units and arithmetic-logic circuits coupled to computer memory, which systems have the capability of storing in computer memory, which computer memory includes electronic circuits configured to store data and program instructions, programmed steps of the method of the invention for execution by a processing unit.
The invention also may be embodied in a computer program product, such as a diskette or other recording medium, for use with any suitable data processing system. Embodiments of a computer program product may be implemented by use of any recording medium for machine-readable information, including magnetic media, optical media, or other suitable media. Persons skilled in the art will immediately recognize that any computer system having suitable programming means will be capable of executing the steps of the method of the invention as embodied in a program product. Persons skilled in the art will recognize immediately that, although most of the exemplary embodiments described in this specification are oriented to software installed and executing on computer hardware, nevertheless, alternative embodiments implemented as firmware or as hardware are well within the scope of the present invention.
Methods, systems, and products are now described for creating a presentation document with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with
Content server (106) includes storage for presentation documents (314) each of which is composed of a presentation grammar (120) and a structured document (122). A presentation grammar is a data structure that includes a set of key phrases used to identify presentation action identifiers and optional parameters for use in formulating presentation control instructions relevant to structural elements of a content type. In typical embodiments, presentation control instructions are represented by and formulated from presentation action identifiers (reference 518 on
The profile class (126) also includes a string array storing user classifications (210). Examples of user classifications (210) include any supported data codes describing users, including, for example “company=IBM,” “department=marketing,” “technical level=3,” “security level=2,” and others as will occur to those of skill in the art.
Agent (110) includes software modules for structuring a presentation document according to content type (114) and for classifying presentation document content according to presentation attributes (116).
Agent class (110) also includes a member method named createStructuedDocument( ) (232) which is programmed to convert an original document into a structured document by inserting structural element identifiers. Examples of structural element identifiers include <page>, <paragraph>, <row>, <column>, <cell>, <slide>, <jpeg>, <title>, <heading>, <subheading>, and so on, as will occur to those of skill in the art. These examples of structural elements identifiers are expressed as markup tags such as would be used, for example, in a markup language such as HTML (“HyperText Markup Language”) or XML (“eXtensible Markup Language”), although this is not a limitation of the invention. In fact, it is well within the scope of the present invention to implement structural element identifiers with binary codes, Unicode identifiers, or by use of other structure identifiers as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of
The method of
Methods of creating presentation documents are further explained with an exemplary use case. Consider the following example of a structured document:
And assume that this exemplary structured document is associated in a presentation document with the following presentation grammar:
This example is discussed with reference to the exemplary system architecture of
Methods of creating presentation documents are further explained with an exemplary use case. Consider the following example of a structured document:
This example is discussed with reference to the exemplary system architecture of
In this example, a first version of paragraph 2 bears a structural identifier <p></p> identifying it as a paragraph, but this first version of paragraph 2 bears no classification identifier. In this example, presentation session (128) is programmed to display this unclassified version of paragraph 2 to users having either the lowest technical classifications, the lowest security classifications, or no particular technical or security classifications at all. Moreover, in an example, where there were only one version of paragraph 2, all users would be presented with that one version.
In this example, a second version of paragraph 2 is classified with a classification identifier <tech level=“2”>. In this example, presentation session (128) is programmed to display this second version of paragraph 2 to users having user classification indicating technical level 2. That is, when a user having technical level 2 in the user's profile classifications (210 on
Similarly, a user having a user profile classification representing a heightened security authorization, security level 2, is shown the version of paragraph 2 classified by the classification identifier <security level=“2”>. A user having a user profile classification identifying the user as a member of the marketing department is shown the version of paragraph 2 classified by the classification identifier <dept id=“marketing”>. A user having a user profile classification identifying the user as an employee of IBM is shown the version of paragraph 2 classified by the classification identifier <company id=“IBM”>.
For purposes of clarity of explanation, the structural elements in this example are shown with only one classification per element. Persons of skill in the art will recognize, however, that it is well within the scope of the present invention for a structural element of a structured document to be classified with any number of classification identifiers.
In the method of
In one exemplary embodiment of the method of
In this example, the content server returns the presentation document as URI encoded data in an HTTP RESPONSE message. In an example where the returned presentation document has this form:
extracting the grammar from the presentation document may be carried out by extracting the portion of the presentation document identified by the tags:
In another exemplary embodiment of the method of
An example of storing a pathname and a network location is storing a URI for the document in a URI array such as that illustrated at reference (220) on
where www.someContentServer.com is a domain name for a web server. The portion of the URI after the domain name but before the question mark, “servlets/getPresentationGrammar,” is a pathname for server-side functionality for retrieving a presentation document. The server-side functionality could be a CGI (Common Gateway Interface (‘CGI’) script or other server-side functionality as will occur to those of skill in the art, but in this example the server-side functionality is taken as a Java servlet identified by its name, “getPresentationGrammar.” The remainder of the URI is query data encoded as a name-value pair identifying the name of a presentation document, “myDoc.doc,” from which a presentation grammar is to be extracted by the servlet.
In such an exemplary embodiment, retrieving (368) a presentation grammar is carried out by requesting the presentation grammar (120) from the content server (106), including communicating the presentation document name as a request parameter; and receiving the presentation grammar (120) in response from the content server (106). In an example where the presentation document is located according to a URI as described above and the content server is implemented with a web server, requesting the presentation grammar (120) from the content server (106), including communicating the presentation document name as a request parameter, may be carried out by parsing the URI into an HTTP GET message:
In another exemplary embodiment of the method of
An example of storing a presentation document identifier and a network location is storing a URI for the document in a URI array such as that illustrated at reference (220) on
where www.someContentServer.com is a domain name for a web server. The portion of the URI after the domain name but before the question mark, “/cgi-bin/getPresentationGrammar,” is a pathname for server-side functionality for retrieving a presentation document. The server-side functionality could be a Java servlet or other server-side functionality as will occur to those of skill in the art, but in this example the server-side functionality is taken as a CGI script named “getPresentationGrammar.” The remainder of the URI is query data encoded as a name-value pair identifying the name of a presentation document, “myDoc.doc,” from which a presentation grammar is to be extracted by the CGI script.
In such an exemplary embodiment, retrieving (368) a presentation grammar is carried out by requesting the presentation grammar (120) from the content server (106), including communicating the presentation document name as a request parameter; and receiving the presentation grammar (120) in response from the content server (106). In an example where the presentation document is located according to a URI as described above and the content server is implemented with a web server, requesting the presentation grammar (120) from the content server (106), including communicating the presentation document name as a request parameter, may be carried out by parsing the URI into an HTTP GET message:
In the method of
In the example of
The method of
The user grammar (208) in this example includes a multiplicity of user grammar elements (378), and the method includes selecting (390) user grammar elements (378) in dependence upon the structural element identifiers (322). In this example, selecting (390) user grammar elements (378) in dependence upon the structural element identifiers (322) is carried out by comparing the elements of the user grammar with each structured document of each presentation document in the presentation session and extracting each user grammar element having a structural element identifier for a structural element that occurs in a structured document of a presentation document in the presentation session. In the method of
In the example of
The method of
The method of
The method of
For further explanation, consider an example of creating a session document that begins with a presentation document having the following contents:
In this example, an audience of users identified for a presentation include users having in their user profiles user classifications indicating technical level ‘2’ and membership in IBM. None of the registered users have security authorizations and none of them are from the marketing department. Filtering this exemplary presentation document, extracting structural elements with classification identifiers corresponding to the user classifications, writing those structural elements to a session document, and filtering the presentation grammar in dependence upon the extracted structural elements, results in the following exemplary session document:
In the resulting session document, the structural element identified as page 2 now excludes versions for security level 2 and for marketing, because none of the users listed for the presentation are in the marketing department or have security authorizations of level 2. In addition, the session grammar excludes a grammar element for bullets because, in the session document above, the only structural element having bullets was the version of paragraph 2 for the marketing department. Excluding the bullets as structural elements in the session structured document means that there is no need to have grammar elements for them in the session grammar. Reducing the number of grammar elements in the session grammar reduces the number of grammar elements in the voice response grammar, thereby increasing the efficiency and accuracy of the voice response server and the overall presentation system.
The method of
The method of
A user profile event (272) may be generated by adding a user to the presentation, where the added user has a new user classification for the presentation. That is, one example of a user profile event (272) is adding to a presentation a user whose user classifications include at least one user classification having no corresponding classification identifier in any structural element in the session structured document. In such an example, at least one of the added user's user classifications is currently not part of any user profile of any of the other users identified for the presentation.
A user profile event (272) also may be generated, for a further example, by changing a user classification (210) in a user profile (126) of a user who is participating in the presentation, where the changed user classification includes a new user classification for the presentation. That is, one example of a user profile event (272) is editing a user's profile during a presentation so that the user's user profile now includes a user classification having no corresponding classification identifier in any structural element in the session structured document. In such an example, the new user classification is currently not part of any user profile of any of the other users identified for the presentation.
The method of
For further explanation, consider the following example of amending a session document (266) during a presentation. In this example, a session document is used for a presentation having users whose user profiles include user classifications of technical level ‘2’ and membership in IBM:
This session document in this example was created from the following presentation document:
The session document in this example contains no structural elements classified for users from the marketing department. After beginning the presentation a user from the marketing department joins the presentation. The user's joining the presentation is represented by adding the user's user identification to a list of users identified for the presentation. Adding the user ID to the list identifies (274) a user profile event (272) which is represented by a data structure that includes the user's user identification (205). Amending the session document proceeds by adding (276) to a session structured document (256) one or more structural elements (402) from a structured document in the presentation document from which the session structured document was created. Adding (276) to the session structured document (256) at least one structural element (402) from the presentation document (314) is carried out by adding a structural element (402) having a classification identifier (708) that corresponds to a user classification (210) of the user. User classifications of the user are read from the user profiles (126) using the user identification (205) provided to the adding process (276) by the user profile event (272). In this example, adding a structural element to the session structured documents is carried out by adding the following paragraph from the structured document of the presentation document set forth above:
thereby creating the following amended session document:
Amending the session document also includes adding to the session grammar of the session document a new grammar element from the presentation grammar. There were no bullets in the session structured document before the exemplary user profile event and therefore no grammar elements supporting presentation control instructions for bullets. Adding the marketing paragraph also added bullets, so the method advantageously includes adding grammar elements supporting presentation control instructions for bullets:
thereby creating the following amended session document:
The method of
In the method of
The method of
For further explanation, consider an example using the following exemplary session document:
In this example, assume that a first user participant has in a user profile user classifications indicating that the user is an IBM employee and a second user has user classifications indicating that the user has technical ability level ‘2’. In this example, a presentation server having the above session document installed upon it receives (458) a presentation control instruction (460) to move to the display to the second page of the session structured document. The presentation server then selects (452) from the session structured document (256) for the first user the structural element identified as a version of page two and classified as:
and for the second user the structural element identified as a version of page two and classified as:
The method of
and for the second user the structural element identified as a version of page two and classified as:
respectively, the first sent to the client device of the first user and the second sent to the client device of the second user. Note that in both transmission, the classification identifiers are omitted, <company id=“IBM”> and <tech level=“2”> respectively.
This example of presenting (454) a selected structural element (456) to a user (124) is expressed in terms of HTML and HTTP, a stateless, asynchronous protocol. Many embodiments will statefully hold open a data communications connection, such as a TCP/IP connection, between a presentation server and a user client device. A Stateful Java Enterprise Session Bean™ may be used, for example, to hold open a TCP/IP connection implemented with a Java socket object. Readers of skill in the art will recognize therefore that HTML and HTTP are used for explanation, not for limitation. In fact, any presentation application using any appropriate data communications protocol useful for multi-media presentations may be used to present structural elements to users according to embodiments of the present invention. Such application may be obtained off-the-shelf commercially or they may be specially developed for particular presentations or kinds of presentation. An example of such an application available commercially is Microsoft NetMeeting™. Examples of other data communications protocols useful with various embodiments of the present invention include the Session Initiation Protocol (“SIP”) specified in the IETF's RFC 2543, the Real Time Streaming Protocol (“RTSP”) as specified in the IETF's RFC 2326, the Real Time Transport Protocol (“RTP”) of RFC 1889, and the World Wide Web Consortium's VoiceXML protocol specified in the 2003 document entitled “Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) Version 2.0”.
The method of
The method of
The method of
The method of
The method of
In the method of
The method of
The method of
The method of
The method of
Start times (662, 664) for individual user speech may be derived from RTSP messages, by tracking text message arrival time in a presentation server (104), or by other means as will occur to those of skill in the art. Durations (652, 654) for individual user speech may be derived from RTSP messages, by inferring duration based upon word or other measures of text length, or by other means as will occur to those of skill in the art.
When simultaneous speech is present (595), displaying (570) the text may include displaying presentation text for a presentation period longer than the period of simultaneous speech (650). Displaying presentation text for a presentation period longer than the period of simultaneous speech (650) may be carried out by displaying presentation text for the total duration of individual speech from a first user and individual speech from a second user (656), including the period of simultaneous speech (650). Alternatively, displaying presentation text for a presentation period longer than the period of simultaneous speech (650) may be carried out by displaying presentation text for the duration of individual speech from a first user (652), including the period of simultaneous speech (650). Alternatively, displaying presentation text for a presentation period longer than the period of simultaneous speech (650) may be carried out by displaying presentation text for the duration of individual speech from a second user (654), including the period of simultaneous speech (650). All of these methods of displaying presentation text for a presentation period longer than the period of simultaneous speech (650) provide the clarifying advantage of displaying additional textual presentation context beyond merely the period of simultaneous speech.
The method of
To provide further clarity a user may be registered with the channel allowing the display of a user name with or instead of a channel ID. For clarity the following exemplary display includes both a channel ID and a user name associated with that channel ID. simultaneously:
Alternatively, when a particular user is identified with a particular channel, the channel identification may be omitted:
In the example just above, it is implicit that individual user speech from channel 1 is identified as the speech of a user named Harold and channel 2 presents Jim's individual user speech. In such an example, without voice recognition, the speech of any user present at Harold's workstation will be represented as Harold's speech—and the same for Jim—thus rendering ambiguous an identification of text with a user name.
In embodiments of the present invention that use voice recognition, however, multiple users can be present at the same workstation, and identifications of text with user names are still unambiguous. More than one user participant can participate in a presentation using a single workstation and speaking into a single microphone. Using voice recognition systems, display text further comprises segregating display text according to user and displaying the segregated text in a display area associated with the user speaking. Voice recognition software installed on the voice response server typically identifies the user speaking and associates a user name with text. The following example includes a channel identification to illustrate that two users are participating over a single channel, channel 1:
It will be understood from the foregoing description that modifications and changes may be made in various embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in this specification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is limited only by the language of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of, prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/756,159, filed on Jan. 13, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,287,221.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3644674 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 4941187 | Slater | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5327176 | Forler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5428400 | Landis et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5724416 | Foladare et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5748725 | Kubo | May 1998 | A |
| 5774857 | Newlin | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5881373 | Elofsson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5901230 | Walker | May 1999 | A |
| 6138040 | Nicholls et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6212275 | Akhteruzzaman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6243454 | Eslambolchi | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6314402 | Monaco et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324499 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6349136 | Light et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6366578 | Johnson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 1028561 | Bates | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 6493671 | Ladd et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6658414 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6725199 | Brittan et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6816858 | Coden et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6820055 | Saindon et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6894715 | Henrikson | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7082422 | Zirngibl et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7162692 | Bodin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7236966 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7287221 | Bodin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7376565 | Gandhi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7428698 | Bodin et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7430707 | Bodin et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7475340 | Bodin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487208 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7487451 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7493556 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7519904 | Bodin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523388 | Bodin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7567908 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7571380 | Bodin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7739600 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7774693 | Bodin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7882437 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890848 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 20010032241 | Braga Illa et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049603 | Sravanapudi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020035976 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087416 | Knutson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087974 | Sprague | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095454 | Reed et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129354 | Bryan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133500 | Arlein et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147782 | Dimitrova et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028871 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037301 | Rising, III | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074447 | Rafey et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093794 | Thomas et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099343 | Dezonno | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123618 | Bhargava et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158969 | Gimson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20050132271 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132273 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132274 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132275 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154970 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165900 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010365 | Bodin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010370 | Bodin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20070250602 | Bodin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080172227 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177866 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080178078 | Bodin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282168 | Bodin et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090037820 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048829 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063944 | Bodin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089659 | Bodin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106668 | Bodin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0124462 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Starner, “The Role of Speech Input in Wearable Computing”, copyright 2002 IEEE, Pervasive Computing, Jul.-Sep. 2002, p. 89-93. |
| Agawa et al.; Image Analysis for Face Modeling and Facial Image Reconstruction; SPIE; 1990; pp. 1184-1197; vol. 1360, pt 2; USA. |
| Engelbart; Authorship Provision in Augment; IEEE Cat. No. 84CH2017-2;Spring 1984; p. 465-472; IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Silver Spring, MD; USA. |
| Freire, et al.; “WebViews: Accessing Personalized Web Content and Services”; Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web; May 2001; ACM Press; p. 576-586. |
| Goose, et al.; Streaming Speech: A Framework for Generating and Streaming 3-D Text-To-Speech and Audio Presentations to Wireless PDAs as Specified Using Extensions to SMIL; WWW2002; May 2002; Honolulu, Hawaii, USA p. 1-16. |
| Kim et al; An Extended Object Composition Model for Distributed Multimedia Services; Cat. No. 98CH36284; Jan. 2002; pp. 279-286, vol. 1; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA; USA. |
| Kim et al.; An Extended Object Composition Model for Distributed Multimedia Supports in World-Wide Web; INSPEC AN B9810-6210R-071, C9810-6130M-080; 1997; pp. 159-174; Singapore. |
| Websgebg et al; Real-time Content-Based Processing of Multicast Video; Cat. No. 98CH36284; 1998; pp. 882-886, vol. 1; IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA; USA. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090048829 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10756159 | Jan 2004 | US |
| Child | 11838610 | US |
