The technical field is power generation with cycled fluid subject to gravity. The invention is a fluid conserving differential gravity power generator, which can be used for electricity generation and motive purposes like ship propulsion. Priority call on [13, 14].
Since the middle ages people tried to build perpetual machines which would run indefinitely and deliver energy for free. Famous is Bhaskara's wheel [1], replicated and tried many times in the literature, but till now without success. Boyle's self-flowing flask [2] and its replicas are other examples of unsuccessful attempts. Genswein [3] described a cyclic fluid method to draw energy from the interaction with gravity, but the initial fluid velocity ν0=(2gh0)1/2 ([3]p. 2 lines 10-15) is wrong. It should be ν0=(gh0)1/2, because the effective head of water in a cylinder or rectangular box of height ho is Xho, cf. Emid [4], in accordance with the theory of Malcherek [5, 6], confirmed by experiments.
A perpetual machine is impossible according to the law of energy conservation [7]. There are many patent applications claiming perpetual motion which turned out to be inoperable. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decided not to grant such patents without a working model [7]. Gravity power plants are proposed [8, 9] without a working model; [8, 9] are discussed in the last section.
The differential gravity power generator (DGPG) is described with an exemplar
It follows from the geometry, calculus and the definition of potential energy relative to its reference point B, cf. [4] that the effective head for T1 is ¼H and for T2 is ⅔H, both with respect to B. So there Is a difference of ⅓H of effective head of T2 over T1, causing a flow from T2 to T1 through B below. From the continuity equation this causes a flow of equal water quantity from T1 to T2 through A above. Therefore, due to the different energetic effects of the gravitational field on the top up T1 and the top down T2, a fluid conserving, differential gravity power generator is created. This principle can be applied to two, or more, water bodies, in various forms and configurations.
It is noted that the name “gravity power generator” in the literature applies to all hydropower plants based on hydraulic head. The addition “differential” is specific for the method. Furthermore, the water in the box is not a conservative system, as it is in interaction with the earth through the gravity. The energy within the box need not be conserved, the energy of the box+earth is conserved.
Experiments have been done with a rectangular box (of multiply concrete casing). L=W=0.18 m, H=0.6 m, slanted plane 0.18×0.62 m, diameters of A and B: 16 mm. The capacity P, net capacity Pn of the water and the resistance R of the embodiment are:
P=⅓QρgH,Pn=P−R,0<R≤P Eq. 1
with Q=π (0.008)2ν, ν2=⅔g H, ρ=103 kg/m3, g=9.8 m/s2. P=0.8 Watt. R depends on factors like roughness, size and shape of the materials, speed of water flow, length and diameter of tubes if any. Observation: Stationary state is established in 2 minutes after filling the box. A laminar flow is observed from T1 to T2 through gate A, with initial flow velocities of about 2 cm/s in the center of the flow, demonstrating that the model works.
In practice to harness the energy difference between T1 and T2, while minimizing the loss of kinetic energy, the most appropriate way is to install a bulb turbine-generator at gate B. This reaction type turbine-generator strips off the kinetic energy from the tall-water that flows into T1 and converts it into pressure head helping to run the turbine. The flow at A becomes slow, so there is less dissipation of kinetic energy into heat.
It is noted that time evolution studies belong to relaxations studies [10], which is outside the scope of the invention, though results will be mentioned in the applications.
Some aspects of the model are mentioned here, with details in next section:
1. T1 and T2 need not be of the same form, nor of the same volume.
2. The capacity P can be enhanced by making B bigger, H higher and by using a solution [11]. The embodiment can be fixed above ground, dig in or submerged e. g. in natural or hydro lake. It can also be configured as ship engine. The method is fluid conserving, no need for a hydro lake or dam. It can be applied in cold climate by adding antifreeze.
3. Other fluids can be used, like liquid carbon dioxide (CO2), enclosed and under pressure. On earth this would contribute to the solution of the CO2 problem. On Mars with more than 95% CO2 in its atmosphere, this would provide ample power for future Martians. Prefabricated embodiments can be sent to Mars prior to manned missions.
4. The method explains the benefit of pyramid homes.
1. T1T2—Model as in
Second example. The rectangular box is of glass (aquarium), with L=W=0.3 m, H=0.4 m, slanted plane of concrete casing 0.3×0.58 m. B: Ø 22 mm, A: Ø 12 mm. The initial flow is about 1 cm/s during 45 minutes. The long time evolution of the flow is between 2-8 mm/s with diurnal variation, experimental duration was one week.
Third example. To mimic Boyle's self-flowing flask [2], T2: H=0.6 m, L=0.4 m, W=0.25 m and T1: H=0.6 m, L=0.14 m and W=3.5 cm. The common plane of T1 and T2 is now vertical, A: Ø 8 mm, B: Ø 25 mm, distance A−B is 0.5 m. Material: concrete casing. Observation: In the stationary state the initial flow velocity is between 2-3 cm/s, largest at the center of the flow. After half an hour the flow slows down to 1-5 mm/s with diurnal variation, experimental duration: one week. This is a working Boyle's self-flowing flask [2].
Other examples are: top up cone C1 (of height H, effective head ¼H) and top down cone C2 (effective head ¾H), or top up pyramid P1 (effective head ¼H) and top down pyramid P2 (effective head ¾H) or combination thereof can be used. A cylinder or a rectangular box has an effective head % H. It follows that the effective head of a C1C2 or P1P2 combination is % H, the same [4] as for traditional (flow through) hydro power plant.
2. Capacity P for a T1T2 Configuration.
H=L=W, effective head ⅓H, ρ=103 kg/m3, g=9.8 m/s2, Q=B (⅔ g H)1/2, choosing for B=0.09 H2. The density p can be enhanced by 5 to 10 times by using a solution, see [11] for a suitable choice of solutes.
For comparison: Biggest wind turbine to date is 10 MW, gas turbine 571 MW, steam turbine 1750 MW/GE Arabelle 1700 and marine engine 81 MW/Wärtsilä TRA 96 [12].
3. Use of other fluids, like liquid CO2 at temperatures >−55° C. For suitable pressures see the phase diagram of CO2 in the literature. The Importance for application on earth and on Mars is already mentioned in the description.
4. The beneficial effect of pyramid home, height H, is due to the difference of the effective air head of the surroundings (½H) and the effective air head in the top up pyramid (¼H). The differential head is ¼H. The density of air is 800 times smaller than that of water. The capacity Pair=0.6 H7/2 Watt. For H=10 m Pair=1.9 kW, for H=15 m Pair=7.8 kW for quiet fresh air circulation through the pyramid home, contributing to the ambient comfort. This occurs even during wind stillness.
Assad mentioned [8] p. 2 “How invention works: The water fall from valve under tank and make shield motion”. At end of p. 2: “Water Return Rising by one way valves and by inversing Power with shield”. Comment: 1. One-way valves do not rise the water, only prevent back flow. 2. “The shield is moved by the falling water, then inversely the shield motion is used to rise the water”. Comment: Even if it works this kind of pump storage method costs more energy than it produces and it is not used in the application.
Moncada Rodriguez, in [9] p. 6 claim 1 lines 2-18, used a cylindrical tank, with conical bottom, as hydraulic head, connected to a U shaped tube, one end at tank bottom, other end at the side inlet at the water level of the tank. Comment:1. Effective head of a cylinder is the same as that of the small tube aside the cylinder, so there will be no flow (communicating vessels with equal effective heads). 2.
It is emphasized that the comments do not questioned the validity of the inventions [8, 9], but only point out the different methods they used, which are not borrowed by the application. It is concluded that [8, 9] are not relevant prior arts for the present invention.
No change needs to be made in the text of the application, as justified below. ItemV1, 1.1 D1(US20130062887A1), D2(WO2010017607A2+A3), D3(WO2004094816 A1)
The written opinion is wrong, as the embodiment is in interaction (strength P, Eq. 1) with earth. It is not an isolated system, see page 2 lines 11-13. The first law of Thermodynamics, stating that the energy of an isolated system is constant, does not apply to the case. Consequently, the written opinion item V 1 and 1.1 should be rejected as being mistaken and invalid comments. Moreover, the last sentence in item V 1.1 incorrectly cites: “continuous” which is not present in the cited page 3 lines 17-18.
Item V 2: D1, 2 and D3 compared to D4 (application). Capacity: P−QρgH: D1: Inventive step is changing g at different parts of the water, by diffraction of presumed outgoing earth's gravity wave. There is no cross-reference (cf. D1) validating the assumption. But even if such a wave (by static earth) would exist, then still the inventive step of D1 differs from that in D4. D4 creates different effective heads, ⅓H in T1 and ⅔H in T2, page 2 lines 1-8.
D2: Its international search report states: “no meaningful international search can be carried out”. However,
D3 is already discussed on page 5 lines 15-20. That position is maintained.
Working models: D1, D2 and D3: None. D4: Yes, several.
Finally: As test of the smallest ship engine, page 4 line 31, experiments were done with a funnel as C2, page 4 line 1 and 2. At water level: Inlets 2×7 Ø 2 cm (with momentum compensation). Horizontal outlet Ø12 mm below in funnel shaft, opening of shaft end is taped off. Funnel height 18 cm, opening Ø=28 cm, material: plastic (floats in water). Observation: Funnel moves in opposite direction as the outlet, which is proof of concept.
With regard to the assumption of gravitational waves in D1, page 6 lines 4, 11-16, experts stated that gravitational waves of the earth is far too small to be measureable with existing instruments, see e.g. [15]. The earth lacks of mass and acceleration/spinning rate to create gravitational waves. Therefore, the assumption makes no sense at all.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1043242 | Apr 2019 | NL | national |
1043369 | Sep 2019 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2020/000003 | 3/4/2020 | WO | 00 |