The present invention relates to measurement of pressures of process fluids in industrial processes. More specifically, the present invention relates to measuring line pressure in a differential pressure transmitter.
Industrial processes are used in the manufacturing and transport of many types of materials. In such systems, it is often required to measure different types of pressure within the process. One type of pressure which is frequently measured is a differential pressure. This is the pressure difference between one point in the process and another point in the process. For example, the differential pressure across an orifice plate in a pipe containing a flow of process fluid is related to the flow rate of the fluid. Differential pressures can also be used, for example, to measure height of a process fluid in a tank or other container.
In industrial processes, pressure sensors are typically contained in, or coupled to, a pressure transmitter which is located at a remote location and transmits pressure related information back to a centralized location such as a control room. The transmission is frequently over a process control loop. For example, a two-wire process control loop is often used in which two wires are used to carry both information as well as power to the transmitter. Wireless process control loops may also be used.
Advancements in transmitter technology have increased the amount of information that can be produced by a transmitter. In particular, transmitters can be equipped with multiple sensors to measure multiple process variable inputs or a wider range of a single process variable. For example, transmitters can be provided with multiple pressure sensors as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,769 to Broden et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,047,244 to Rud, Jr. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,467,555 to Schulte et al., all of which are assigned to Rosemount Inc., Chanhassen, Minn.
In many process installations, in addition to measuring a differential pressure, it is also desirable to measure an absolute or gauge pressure (also referred to as “line pressure”) of the process. This information can be used, for example, to provide more accurate flow measurements by including changes in density of the process fluid in the flow calculations. The additional pressure measurements can be made using a separate pressure sensor.
A process variable transmitter for measuring a pressure of a process fluid includes a first inlet configured to couple to a first process pressure and a second inlet configured to couple to a second process pressure. A differential pressure sensor couples to the first and second inlets and provides an output related to a differential pressure between the first pressure and the second pressure. A first pressure sensor couples to the first inlet and provides an output related to the first pressure. Transmitter circuitry provides a transmitter output based upon the output from the differential pressure sensor and further provides enhanced functionality based upon the output from the first pressure sensor.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides an apparatus and method for providing enhanced functionality to a differential pressure measurement transmitter using at least one line pressure sensor. More specifically, in one aspect, the present invention includes a line pressure sensor which is coupled directly to a process pressure for use in performing diagnostics or providing other functionality. The pressure sensor is coupled directly to the process fluid through a direct coupling passageway which couples to the process fluid. The passageway can be located in a flange which is used to connect the pressure transmitter to process fluid or, alternatively, the passageway can be formed within the pressure transmitter itself.
Process control loop 38 can provide both power to the transmitter 36 from a control room 40 and bi-directional communication, and can be operated in accordance with a process communication protocol. In the illustrated example, the process loop 38 is a two-wire loop. The two-wire loop is used to transmit all power to and all communications to and from the transmitter 36 during normal operations with a 4-20 mA signal. Control room 40 includes a power supply 46 and a series resistance 44. In another example configuration, loop 38 is a wireless connection in which data may be transmitted and/or received wirelessly in a point-to-point configuration, a mesh network, or other configuration with the transmitter 36 having its own power source.
Also illustrated in
In accordance with the illustrated embodiment, line pressure sensors 304A and 304B directly couple to pressures P1 and P2, respectively, and provide outputs related to the pressures and to analog to digital conversion circuitry 62. Microprocessor system 74 can monitor line pressure P1 and P2. Pressure sensors 304A and 304B may operate in accordance with known techniques including pressure measurement techniques in which an electrical capacitance of the sensors 304A and 304B changes, an electrical resistance changes, a resonant frequency changes, etc. One specific configuration is discussed below in more detail.
In the illustrated embodiment, sensor 56 is a capacitance-based differential pressure cell having a sensing diaphragm disposed between a pair of electrode plates. Sensor 56 is connected to pressure P1 and P2 through base 54 with isolation tubes 93 and 94, in which is disposed a hydraulic fill fluid. Isolation diaphragms 90 separate the fill fluid within isolation tubes 93 and 94 from the process fluid but transfer pressures P1 and P2 therebetween. Changes in pressures P1 and P2 of process fluid are sensed as a differential pressure ΔP by sensor 56. The invention is not limited to this differential pressure measurement configuration.
According to this embodiment, sensor module 52 includes line pressure sensor 304A which is carried within the body of module 52. Further,
In the described embodiment, line pressure sensors 304A and 304B are capacitance-based absolute pressure sensors. In one configuration, sensors 304A and 304B operate as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,484,585 to Sittler et al. and the related series of patents, all of which are assigned to Rosemount Inc., Chanhassen, Minn. Such sensors include technology that uses brittle sensing materials having high compression strength. One suitable brittle material is sapphire. To provide enhanced functionality to the transmitter, the pressures P1 and P2 sensed by pressure sensors 304A and 304B can be compared to one another to produce a signal representative of the differential pressure ΔP that can be used in place of, or for comparison to, the differential pressure ΔP sensed by sensor 56. The difference between the outputs from sensors 304A and 304B can also be used to determine large differential pressures, perform diagnostics, provide calibration to sensor 56, or provide other functionality. Sensors 56, 304A and 304B can thus be used in a wide variety of scenarios to sense line pressures and differential pressures and provide enhanced functionality to the transmitter.
Referring back to
The additional pressure sensors 304A, 304B can be used to extend the range over which the device is capable of sensing pressure. For example, the line pressure sensors 304A and 304B can be used to determine the differential pressure of the process fluid in instances when the differential pressure exceeds the upper range limit of pressure sensor 56. Although such a configuration may reduce the accuracy of the differential pressure measurements, in some instances this tradeoff may be acceptable in order to provide the increased measurement range.
The sensors 304A, 304B can be used to enable redundant differential pressure measurements for use in providing sensor diagnostics. The differential pressure measured using line sensors 304A and 304B can be compared with differential pressure measured using differential pressure sensor 56. Microprocessor 74 uses differences between these two measurements to identify a failing sensor.
In one configuration, pressure sensors 304A and 304B are used to provide differential pressure measurements if the differential pressure sensor 56 has failed or is providing an inaccurate measurement. This configuration allows the transmitter 36 to operate in a limited (or “limp”) mode having a reduced accuracy until the failed equipment can be repair or replaced. If microprocessor system 74 detects that sensor 56 has failed, the microprocessor 74 can calculate differential pressure based upon the outputs from sensors 304A and 304B. Because sensors 304A, 304B couple directly to the process fluid, they can continue to operate even if one of the isolation diaphragms 90 or tubes 93, 94 fail. Diagnostic information such as information which indicates that the transmitted process variable has a reduced accuracy because the transmitter is operating in a “limp” mode can also be provided. This configuration allows the industrial process to continue operation, perhaps at a reduced capacity, until repairs can be implemented.
In another configuration, diagnostics are performed by microprocessor system 74 on the pressure sensors 304A, 304B based upon the differential pressure measured by differential pressure sensor 56. During normal operation, the pressure measured by one of the pressure sensors 304A, 304B should be substantially equal to a sum or difference between the pressure measured by the other line pressure sensor 304A, 304B and the differential pressure measured by differential pressure sensor 56. Similarly, the sensors 304A, 304B can be used to identify a plugging of impulse piping or a failing primary element.
In the embodiments described, the use of two different types of sensors may also be used to provide sensors having different frequency responses. For example, a metal diaphragm used in differential pressure sensor 56 operates as a low pass filter that tends to filter out higher frequency process noise in the pressures applied to the sensor 56. On the other hand, the sapphire based line pressure sensors 304A, 304B have a higher frequency response and are capable of providing faster measurements. This high frequency response can be used to measure noise signals on either side of the differential pressure sensor 56. This can be used to provide enhanced process statistics or diagnostics, such as identifying a plugged impulse line or other failing component in the process. The line pressure signals can also be used to calibrate the differential pressure sensor 56 as well as be used to compensate the differential pressure measurement for any changes due to high line pressure. For example, the configuration of pressure sensors 304A and 304B described above offers relatively stable measurements over an extended time period. As the sensors 304A and 304B are relatively stable, their measurements can be used to calibrate drift in the measurements provided by pressure sensor 56. Thus, calibration can be performed by microprocessor 74. In another example, the additional pressure measurements provided by line pressure sensors 304A and 304B can be used to provide line pressure compensation by microprocessor 74 to differential pressure sensor 56 pressure measurements. In one configuration, the use of two absolute or line pressure sensor measurements can be used to more accurately compensate for variations of the differential pressure measurements. Compensation algorithms can be implemented in microprocessor 74 based upon calibration information stored in memory 76 in
In one configuration, the line pressure sensors 304A and 304B have an upper range limit of about 5,000 psi. As the line pressure sensors 304A, 304B described herein operate based upon capacitance variation, various operations and components of the measurement system may be shared with the differential pressure sensor 56, such as temperature sensor 63 shown in
According to one embodiment,
In the present invention, absolute pressure sensors are arranged to measure process pressures directly without an intermediary diaphragm or fill fluid. Thus, should a diaphragm fail, the absolute pressure sensors are capable of continued operation. In the above examples, the direct coupling passageways are formed in the flange. However, in another example configuration, the direct coupling passageways are formed within sensor module 52 and extend from a location proximate diaphragms 90 to the cavities that carry sensors 304A and 304B.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The line pressures sensors can be coupled to P1 and P2 in any appropriate manner and is not limited to the configurations shown herein. The various functions described above can be implemented using any appropriate circuitry and the implementation of such functionality can be shared between components and implemented using the same or separate circuitry. As used herein “transmitter circuitry” refers to any circuitry within transmitter 36. As used herein, “enhanced functionality” includes system diagnostics, component diagnostics, process diagnostics, transmitter diagnostics, sensor diagnostics, extended operation range, calibration of components, statistical process measurements and limited device operation in the event of a component failure. With the present invention, at least one absolute sensor is coupled to a process pressure in a pressure transmitter. The additional pressure sensor directly couples to the process pressure through an opening which is used to couple the differential pressure sensor to process fluid. In one configuration, a diaphragm is provided which separates the process fluid from the differential pressure sensor by sealing an isolation fluid on one side of the diaphragm which transfers the process fluid pressure to the differential pressure sensor. In such a configuration, the additional pressure sensor can be directly coupled to the process fluid on the side of the isolation diaphragm exposed to the process fluid. In such a configuration, the additional sensor couples to the process fluid on the process fluid side of the diaphragm. In this configuration, the additional sensor is directly exposed to process fluid.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2533339 | Willenborg | Dec 1950 | A |
3012432 | Moore et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3169402 | Baker | Feb 1965 | A |
3218863 | Calvert | Nov 1965 | A |
3232712 | Stearns | Feb 1966 | A |
3249833 | Vosteen | May 1966 | A |
3374112 | Danon | Mar 1968 | A |
3410135 | Reynaud | Nov 1968 | A |
3557621 | Ferran | Jan 1971 | A |
3561832 | Karrer et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3697835 | Satori | Oct 1972 | A |
3808480 | Johnston | Apr 1974 | A |
3924219 | Braun | Dec 1975 | A |
4008619 | Alcaide et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4120206 | Rud, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4158217 | Bell | Jun 1979 | A |
4161123 | Carpenter | Jul 1979 | A |
4168518 | Lee | Sep 1979 | A |
4177496 | Bell et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4227419 | Park | Oct 1980 | A |
4244226 | Green et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4287553 | Braunlich | Sep 1981 | A |
4332775 | Genequand et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336567 | Anastasia | Jun 1982 | A |
4358814 | Lee et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370890 | Frick | Feb 1983 | A |
4389895 | Rud, Jr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4422125 | Antonazzi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422335 | Ohnesorge et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4434451 | Delatorre | Feb 1984 | A |
4455874 | Paros | Jun 1984 | A |
4458537 | Bell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4466290 | Frick | Aug 1984 | A |
4490773 | Moffatt | Dec 1984 | A |
4531415 | Orlowski et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4538466 | Kerber | Sep 1985 | A |
4542436 | Carusillo | Sep 1985 | A |
4558184 | Busch-Vishniac et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562742 | Bell | Jan 1986 | A |
4578735 | Knecht et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4586108 | Frick | Apr 1986 | A |
4604901 | Kagi | Aug 1986 | A |
4623813 | Naito et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4644796 | Ward | Feb 1987 | A |
4670733 | Bell | Jun 1987 | A |
4739666 | Hafner et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741213 | Hojoh | May 1988 | A |
4785669 | Benson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4829826 | Valentin et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860232 | Lee et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864874 | Hafner | Sep 1989 | A |
4875369 | Delatorre | Oct 1989 | A |
4878012 | Schulte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878385 | Lloyd | Nov 1989 | A |
4926674 | Fossum et al. | May 1990 | A |
4951174 | Grantham et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4977480 | Nishihara | Dec 1990 | A |
4995265 | Stocker | Feb 1991 | A |
5012677 | Shimada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5094109 | Dean et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136885 | Liebermann et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144841 | Brouwers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5168419 | Delatorre | Dec 1992 | A |
5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
5230250 | Delatorre | Jul 1993 | A |
5233875 | Obermeier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5291795 | Hafner | Mar 1994 | A |
5329818 | Frick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5415048 | Diatschenko et al. | May 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471882 | Wiggins | Dec 1995 | A |
5492016 | Pinto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495769 | Broden et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5524492 | Frick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531120 | Nagasu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542300 | Lee | Aug 1996 | A |
5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642301 | Warrior et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5680109 | Lowe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757608 | Bernot et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760310 | Rud et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5911162 | Denner | Jun 1999 | A |
5920016 | Broden | Jul 1999 | A |
5969258 | Gerst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992240 | Tsuruoka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003219 | Frick et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6047244 | Rud, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055863 | Behm et al. | May 2000 | A |
6236096 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250164 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6295875 | Frick et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301973 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6367333 | Bullister et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6484585 | Sittler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6508131 | Frick | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520020 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530282 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539807 | Wohlrab et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543291 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564643 | Horie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568278 | Nelson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6647794 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654697 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662662 | Nord et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675655 | Broden et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701274 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6828801 | Burdick et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6892582 | Satou et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901101 | Frick | May 2005 | B2 |
6945582 | Chen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6992492 | Burdick et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7159468 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7379629 | Burns | May 2008 | B1 |
7401522 | Broden et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7454975 | Louwagie et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461562 | Schumacher | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7490519 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7540196 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7624642 | Romo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702478 | Hedtke et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7954383 | Willcox et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8015882 | Klosinski et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8132464 | Broden et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020117006 | Paros et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178822 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020178827 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030177837 | Broden et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015069 | Brown | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093951 | Viola et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040168523 | Fernald et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233458 | Frick | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005712 | Gysling et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050011278 | Brown et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041375 | Rosenau | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063444 | Frick | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097963 | Wilda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132808 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060070448 | Baumann et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060206288 | Brahmajosyula et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232281 | Vittorio et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060278005 | Broden et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278007 | Harasyn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070220985 | Hedtke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080006094 | Schulte et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100010755 | Paulitsch | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 932 899 | Jan 1971 | DE |
3340834 | May 1985 | DE |
43 33 753 | May 1994 | DE |
0 423 903 | Jun 1985 | EP |
021393 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 524 550 | Jan 1993 | EP |
1 026 493 | Aug 2000 | EP |
941804 | Jan 1949 | FR |
1530952 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2178536 | Feb 1987 | GB |
2005280536 | Oct 2005 | JP |
WO 9304343 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9304349 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9953286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0159418 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0159419 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0223148 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2005033643 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006092052 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007019676 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 11, 2013, for International Appln. No. PCT/US2013/035605, filed Apr. 8, 2013. 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/038692, dated Oct. 7, 2011, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/064712, filed Nov. 17, 2009, 14 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/064705, filed Nov. 17, 2009, 16 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/064716, filed Nov. 17, 2009, 13 pages. |
“International Search Report” for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/036404, filed Sep. 19, 2006, 3 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2006/036404, filed Sep. 19, 2006, 2 pages. |
Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/036404, filed Sep. 19, 2006, 6 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2006/046742, filed Jul. 12, 2006, 11 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/012050. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration of PCT/US2006/020254. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/US2006/019955. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130333440 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |