Patent Grant
8673291
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This ASCII copy, created on May 24, 2011, is named CA2193.txt and is 356,718 bytes in size.
This application relates generally to the identification and isolation of a cluster of genes sufficient to produce a bacteriocin, and more specifically, an R-type high molecular weight bacteriocin that specifically kills Clostridium difficile, and methods to alter its bactericidal specificity, produce and use the same.
Clostridium difficile is an obligate anaerobic, spore-forming, gram positive bacterium that is a notorious pathogen for humans and other mammals (Bartlett et al., 1977; Bartlett et al., 1979; Keel et al., 2007; Sunenshine & McDonald, 2006). At low densities C. difficile can reside innocuously in the mammalian gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but upon expansion, frequently as the result of administered antibiotics reducing the commensal bacteria, C. difficile bacteria produce sufficient exotoxins to cause a range of diseases from a mild diarrheal disease to a characteristic pseudo-membranous colitis, which is life-threatening, particularly to older humans and others with significant co-morbidities (Bartlett, 2002).
Because spores formed by this pathogen disseminate widely and are difficult to eradicate or inactivate in hospitals and chronic care facilities, the probability of patients being colonized by C. difficile increases sharply upon their entering such a facility (Bartlett, 2007). In fact, a relatively new strain of C. difficile that is a hypervirulent toxigenic bacterial strain of C. difficile, BI/NAP1/027, which causes severe disease in massive outbreak settings, has recently been well documented (Spigaglia et al., 2002; Pépin et al., 2004; McDonald et al., 2005; Muto et al., 2005; Loo et al., 2005; Belmares et al., 2009). The incidence of C. difficile associated disease (CDAD) in children, previously at low risk, has also increased substantially (Benson et al., 2007; Zilberberg et al., 2010).
Eliminating the pathogen prophylactically in asymptomatic carrier or colonized subjects by administering antibiotics is strongly contraindicated because of the high risk of inducing C. difficile associated disease.
R-type bacteriocins made by gram negative bacteria have been described and have been deployed by such bacteria to kill other competitive gram negative strains, even in some circumstances other species or genera of gram negative bacteria (Kageyama et al., 1964; Kageyama et al., 1964a; Kingsbury, D, 1966; Blackwell and Law, 1981; Blackwell et al., 1982; Campagnari et al., 1994; Strauch et al., 2001; Jabrane et al., 2002). The fusion of base plate attachment regions (BPAR) of R-type pyocins to heterologous receptor binding domains (RBD), resulting in the creation of novel R-type pyocins with novel bactericidal specificities for gram negative bacteria has been described (Williams et al., 2008; Scholl et al., 2009).
Other high-molecular-weight bacteriocins or R-type bacteriocins have been described in gram-positive bacteria (Coetzee et al., 1968; Thompson and Pattee, 1981; Zink et al., 1995). However, much less is known about R-type high molecular weight bacteriocin structures produced by gram positive bacteria. But while such have been described, none has been characterized at a genetic level or manipulated in a manner supportive or necessary for developing a useful agent. High molecular weight bacteriocins have been described for 2 Clostridium species, botulinum and perfringens (Ellison and Kautter, 1970; Anastasio et al., 1971; Nieves et al., 1981). None has been described that is produced by C. difficile or kills C. difficile.
This invention is based on the isolation of the entire genetic locus or gene cluster encoding the C. difficile-specific R-type bacteriocins (herein termed “diffocins”) that are bactericidal against other strains of C. difficile; the expression of the diffocin gene cluster and production of diffocins in aerobic bacteria; and the discovery that the open reading frame (ORF) 1374 of the diffocin gene cluster determines the bactericidal spectrum of that diffocin against C. difficile strains. This invention provides a practical means of altering the specificity of diffocins by genetic engineering to produce novel diffocins and of manufacturing and administering directly or indirectly diffocins to eliminate C. difficile from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of colonized animals, including humans. The administration of diffocins can treat or prevent the development of C. difficile infection and associated disease without harming, as do traditional antibiotics, the commensal GI bacteria so necessary for good health.
In accordance with the present invention, there are provided isolated nucleic acid molecules encoding R-type high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocins. In one embodiment there are provided, isolated nucleic acid molecules encoding R-type high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocins, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is from a genome of a strain of Clostridium difficile, and wherein the R-type hmw bacteriocin comprises a polypeptide that is at least 80% identical to a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 4-16, 18, 19, and 66-80, and the R-type hmw bacteriocin has a receptor binding domain (RBD) that binds a receptor of at least one other strain of C. difficile and therefore has bactericidal activity against the other strain or strains of C. difficile. In particular embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule is from a genome of a strain of Clostridium difficile selected from the group consisting of Cd4, Cd16, Cd19108, Cd19123, Cd19126, Cd19145, and ATCC Accession No. 43593. In some embodiments, the strain is Cd16 and the nucleic acid molecule includes SEQ ID NO:1 or the strain is Cd4 and the nucleic acid molecule includes SEQ ID NO:61
In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided isolated R-type bacteriocins encoded by a nucleic acid molecule of the invention. In one aspect, the R-type bacteriocins are expressed in an aerobic producer bacterium.
In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided isolated R-type high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocins having bactericidal activity, wherein the R-type hmw bacteriocin includes a base plate attachment region (BPAR) of a first strain of a first species of bacteria of genus Clostridium, and a receptor binding domain (RBD) from a second strain of the first species, or from a second species of the genus Clostridium or of a bacteriophage that infects a Clostridium species, or a modified form of an RBD, wherein the bacteriocin has bactericidal activity against at least one strain of Clostridium difficile. In particular embodiments, the BPAR is from a first strain of Clostridium difficile and the RBD is from a second strain of Clostridium difficile or from a bacteriophage that infects Clostridium difficile. In some embodiments, the BPAR is at least 80% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56 and 78. In other embodiments, the RBD is at least 80% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 17, and 49-56. In certain embodiments, the BPAR is at least 80% identical to a polypeptide containing 50 or more contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NO:16 or 78 or containing 50 or more contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NOs: 54-56.
In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided expression cassettes containing a nucleic acid molecule of the invention. Expression cassettes may be contained within an expression vector, such as a plasmid, or may be contained within the chromosome of a producer cell. In some embodiments, the expression cassette contains a heterologous promoter operably linked to the nucleic acid molecule encoding the R-type bacteriocin. The promoter may be inducible, repressible, or constitutively active. In one aspect, the promoter is inducible; in another aspect the promoter is repressible. In some embodiments, the promoter is induced by adding or removing a small molecule inducer, repressor, or de-repressor. In one aspect, the promoter is induced by a small molecule inducer or de-repressor. In a particular aspect, the expression of the cassette is regulated by an operably linked recA gene encoding a constitutively active RecA protein and under the control of an heterologous promoter responsive to a small molecule inducer or de-repressor.
In still another embodiment of the invention, there are provided producer cells containing the expression cassettes of the invention. The expression cassette may be contained in an episomal expression vector within the producer cell. Alternatively, the producer cells may contain within their chromosome a nucleic acid molecule or expression cassette of the invention. In certain embodiments, the producer cell is a non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium. In some embodiments, the non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium is a species from a genus of bacteria selected from the group consisting of Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Listeria. In certain embodiments, the non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium is from the genus Bacillus. In some aspects, the bacterium is Bacillus subtilis. In a particular aspect, the B. subtilis lacks the PBSX gene cluster. In another embodiment the producer cell is an obligate anaerobic but non-pathogenic bacterium.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, there are provided methods of producing an R-type hmw bacteriocin of the invention. The method includes exposing a producer cell containing a nucleic acid sequence of the invention operably linked to an inducible or derepressible promoter sensitive to an inducing or repressing agent, to the agent in a concentration effective to induce expression of the R-type bacteriocin, and purifying the expressed R-type bacteriocin. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule encoding the R-type bacteriocin is heterologous to the genome of the producer cell. In particular aspects, the nucleic acid molecule is contained within the producer cell's chromosome or is contained in an extrachromosomal expression vector within the producer cell. In certain embodiments, the producer cell is a non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium. In some embodiments, the non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium is a species from a genus of bacteria selected from the group consisting of Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Listeria. In certain embodiments, the non-pathogenic and not obligate anaerobic bacterium is from the genus Bacillus. In some aspects, the bacterium is Bacillus subtilis. In a particular aspect, the B. subtilis does not lyse when induced to produce the R-type bacteriocin. In a further aspect, the B. subtilis lacks the PBSX gene cluster.
In a further embodiment of the invention, there are provided methods of killing a pathogenic bacterium. The method includes contacting the pathogenic bacterium with an R-type bacteriocin of the invention, whereby the R-type bacteriocin binds and kills the pathogenic bacterium. In one aspect, the pathogenic bacterium is Clostridium difficile. In one aspect, the Clostridium difficile is in an animal and a bactericidal amount of the R-type bacteriocin is administered to the animal.
In another embodiment of the invention there are provided methods of treating or preventing a disease-causing infection of Clostridium difficile in an animal. The method includes administering a bactericidal amount of an R-type bacteriocin of the invention directly to an animal in need thereof, administering the agent indirectly by administering producer cells, or administering spores of C. difficile bacteria which produce natural diffocins but have been genetically modified to not produce toxins. In particular embodiments, an infection of Clostridium difficile in an animal is treated by administering to an animal in need thereof an amount of a producer cell of the invention to produce a bactericidal amount of the bacteriocin, thereby treating the infection. In one aspect, the nucleic acid encoding the bacteriocin is under the control of a lac promoter and the animal is administered lactose. In some embodiments, the animal is a mammal. In one aspect, the mammal is a human.
FIGS. 1A through 1AH provide the nucleic acid or amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs:1-80.
As used herein, an “R-type high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocin” is also known as simply an “R-type bacteriocin” and includes R-type pyocins, diffocins, monocins, enterocoliticins, meningocins, or other high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocins related structurally or genetically to the myoviridae family of bacteriophages. An R-type bacteriocin includes modified versions of R-type pyocins, diffocins, enterocoliticins, monocins, and meningocins (Williams et al. 2008; Strauch et al., 2001; Kingsbury, 1966; Zink et al. 1995).
The term “diffocin,” as used herein refers to an R-type high molecular weight bacteriocin isolated from or derived from Clostridium difficile and includes native particles obtained from C. difficile as well as particles obtained through expression of the diffocin gene cluster in a non-natural producer cell. A diffocin may also be an engineered particle comprised of polypeptides encoded by genes derived from one or more strains of C. difficile, and 80% or more identical to one or more polypeptides of SEQ ID NOs: 2-23, 49 and 62-80.
An R-type bacteriocin of the invention may be thermolabile, mild acid resistant, trypsin resistant, sedimentable by centrifugation at about 65,000×g, and resolvable by electron microscopy (Kageyama et al., 1962; Bradley, 1967; Daw et al., 1996; Jabrane et al., 2002; Fortier et al., 2007). In many cases, an engineered R-type bacteriocin disclosed herein has one or more, in any combination, of these properties. An additional property common to the R-type bacteriocins disclosed herein is that they do not contain nucleic acid and thus are replication deficient such that they cannot reproduce themselves after or during the killing of a target bacterium, as can many bacteriophages. They are purely proteins, not organisms.
R-type bacteriocins disclosed herein are complex molecules comprising multiple protein, or polypeptide, subunits and resemble the tail structures of bacteriophages of the myoviridae family. In naturally occurring R-type bacteriocins, the subunit structures are encoded by the bacterial genome such as that of C. difficile or P. aeruginosa and form R-type bacteriocins to serve as natural defenses against other bacteria (Kageyama, 1975). A sensitive, target bacterium can typically be killed by a single R-type bacteriocin molecule (Kageyama et al., 1964; Kageyama et al., 1964a; Morse et al., 1980; Strauch et al., 2001).
A “target bacterium” or “target bacteria” refers to a bacterium or bacteria that are bound by an R-type bacteriocin of the disclosure and/or whose growth, survival, or replication is inhibited thereby. In some embodiments, the target bacterium is from the genus Clostridum. In particular embodiments, the bacterium is Clostridium difficile. In one aspect, more than one strain of C. difficile is targeted. Exemplary strains of C. difficile include but are not limited to NAP1/BI/ribotype 027, as well as those listed in
The term “growth inhibition” or variations thereof refers to the slowing or stopping of the rate of a bacterial cell's division or cessation of bacterial cell division, or to death of the bacterium or bacteria.
As used herein, a “nucleic acid” or a “nucleic acid molecule” typically refers to deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotides polymers (pure or mixed) in single-or double-stranded form. The term may encompass nucleic acids containing nucleotide analogs or modified backbone residues or linkages, which are synthetic, naturally occurring, and non-naturally occurring, which have similar binding, structural, or functional properties as the reference nucleic acid, and which are metabolized in a manner similar to the reference nucleotides. Examples of such analogs include, without limitation, phosphorothioates, phosphoramidates, methyl phosphonates, chiral-methyl phosphonates, 2-0-methyl ribonucleotides, and peptide-nucleic acids (PNAs). The term nucleic acid may, in some contexts, be used interchangeably with gene, cDNA, mRNA, oligonucleotide, and polynucleotide.
A particular nucleic acid sequence also encompasses conservatively modified variants thereof (such as degenerate codon substitutions) and complementary sequences, as well as the sequence explicitly indicated. Specifically, degenerate codon substitutions may be achieved by generating sequences in which the third (“wobble”) position of one or more selected (or all) codons is substituted with mixed-base and/or deoxyinosine residues. Thus, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a protein sequence disclosed herein also encompasses modified variants thereof as described herein.
The term “segment” as used herein in reference to an amino acid sequence refers to a contiguous sequence of amino acids that may be 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 50, or 100 amino acid residues in length.
As used herein, the term “heterologous,” when used with reference to portions of a protein or nucleic acid sequence, indicates that the sequence comprises two or more subsequences that are not usually found in the same relationship to each other in nature. In one example, the heterologous sequences are from different species of bacteria. In another example, heterologous sequences are from different strains of the same species of bacteria. In one aspect, the heterologous sequences are from different strains of C. difficile. In another aspect the heterologous sequences are from a bacterium and a bacteriophage or from a bacterium and a synthetic, non-natural sequence of DNA.
The terms “polypeptide”, “peptide”, and “protein” are typically used interchangeably herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. Amino acids may be referred to herein by either their commonly known three letter symbols or by the one-letter symbols recommended by the IUPAC-IUB Biochemical Nomenclature Commission.
Virulence factors are those molecules that contribute to the pathogenicity of an organism but not necessarily its general viability. Upon the loss of a virulence factor the organism is less pathogenic but not necessarily less viable. Virulence factors may have any one of numerous functions, for example, regulating gene expression, providing adhesion or mobility, providing a toxin, injecting a toxin, pumping out antibiotic agents, or forming protective coatings including biofilms.
Fitness factors are those molecules that contribute to the organism's general viability, growth rate or competitiveness in its environment. Upon the loss of a fitness factor, the organism is less viable or competitive and because of this compromise, indirectly less pathogenic. Fitness factors may also possess any one of numerous functions, for example, acquiring nutrients, ions or water, forming components or protectants of cell membranes or cell walls, replicating, repairing or mutagenizing nucleic acids, providing defense from or offense towards environmental or competitive insults.
The term “producer cell” as used herein refers to a cell that is capable of producing or expressing a diffocin-encoding nucleic acid molecule and which does not naturally contain such a nucleic acid molecule. The producer cell may be capable of surviving and growing in the presence of oxygen and is transformed with a vector containing nucleic acid molecule encoding the diffocin, which may be integrated into the chromosome of the producer cell or may be episomal. The producer cell may be a gram positive bacterium. In certain embodiments, the producer cell may be a bacterium from the genus Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, or Listeria. In some embodiments, the bacterium is a species from the genus Bacillus selected from the group consisting of subtilis, amyloliquefaciens, and megaterium. In one aspect, the bacterium is Bacillus subtilis. In a particular aspect, the producer cell is a B. subtilis strain that lacks the PBSX gene cluster. In other embodiments, the bacterium is a species from the genus Lactobacillus selected from the group consisting of acidophilus, casei, and bulgaricus. In still other embodiments, the bacterium is Listeria innocua. In another embodiment, the non-pathogenic producer cell may be Escherichia coli or of the genus Clostridium
R-Type Bacteriocins Isolated from C. difficile have Bactericidal Activity.
To test for bactericidal activity, lysates of two C. difficile strains, Cd4 and Cd16 (from LC Fortier), were made by growing the cells to mid-log phase under strict anaerobic conditions throughout and then exposing the culture to 3 μg/ml of mitomycin C. After the bacterial cells lysed, particles in the lysates were concentrated and purified by high speed centrifugation (see Example 1). These preparations were shown by electron microscopy to contain concentrated headless phage-like particles (
Dif4 (diffocin from Cd4) and dif16 (diffocin from Cd16) demonstrated different bactericidal spectra based on spot assays (
Identification of the Diffocin Locus.
Diffocin particles, isolated and purified from strain Cd4, were denatured, and the protein components were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS PAGE) and detected by silver stain (
Since these ORFs mapped in very close proximity within the Cd630 genome, the surrounding region was analyzed. A prophage-like element was found between bases 1574593 and 1596384, which includes ORFs 1360A-1379 (
The structural genes were all encoded on one strand and transcribed in the same direction. The organization of the genes resembled that of the genes of R-type pyocins and many Myoviridae phages. Several of the structural proteins displayed sequence similarity to known C. difficile bacteriophages including phages Φ119, and ΦC2 (Goh et al., 2007; Govind et al., 2006). C. difficile strain Cd630 was also known to encode two intact prophages, both of which were known to be inducible (Goh et al., 2007). Several of the diffocin ORFs had sequence similarity to prophage 1 and 2 of C. difficile strain Cd630, suggesting that these C. difficile Myoviridae phages and the diffocins share common ancestry.
Of particular note was ORF 1374 (SEQ ID NO:17) of the diffocin. This gene encoded a large polypeptide that is located just downstream of ORF 1373, SEQ ID NO:16, a location in the cluster that indicated that ORF 1374 was part of the R-type bacteriocin tail fiber, that is, a receptor binding domain (RBD). Since electron micrographs of what have been designated as diffocins revealed a large flower like structure in the tail fiber region, it was apparent that this structure comprised a large protein. ORF 1373 (SEQ ID NO:16) encoded the base plate attachment region, BPAR, of the diffocin tail fiber and appeared to be a truncated form of a the analogous ORF 1373 in phages of C. difficile which encoded the RBD as well as the BPAR, given that such phages lack an ORF 1374. Thus, the tail fibers of naturally occurring diffocins are comprised of two proteins, ORF1373 and ORF1374, which form a jointed tail fiber, whereas bacteriophages of C. difficile have a tail fiber comprised of a single protein, a somewhat longer ORF 1373 which provides the BPAR and the RBD functions. With this knowledge the nucleic acids encoding either ORF1373 (SEQ ID NO:16) or ORF1374 (SEQ ID NO:17) were deployed herein as substrates from which to engineer new RBD specificity functions.
Diffocins are Wide-Spread Among C. difficile Isolates.
A series of independent clinical isolates of C. difficile were tested for the ability to produce diffocin particles that might have different bactericidal spectra. Clinical isolates Cd19123, Cd19145, Cd19126, Cd19108 (from RM Alden Research Laboratory, Culver City, Calif.), and ATCC Cd43593 were induced with mitomycin C under strict anaerobic conditions, followed by purification and concentration of particles that were produced. The purified materials were then spotted separately on lawns of other C. difficile strains in the clinical collection to detect bactericidal activity. The results showed that each of these isolates produced particles (diffocins termed dif123, dif145, dif126, dif108, and dif43593 from clinical isolates Cd19123, Cd19145, Cd19126, Cd19108, and ATCC Cd43593, respectively) with differing bactericidal spectra (
It was recognized herein that the genome sequenced laboratory strain Cd630 encoded a diffocin locus; and, in fact, this genome was used herein to identify the diffocin genes. However, while strain Cd630 lysed after induction with mitomycin C, no detectable diffocin particles were produced. Instead, small amounts of prophage 1 and prophage 2 were produced.
Identification and Cloning of a Diffocin Cluster.
Cd630 did not produce detectable diffocin particles upon induction of lysis by mitomycin C. Accordingly, the diffocin gene cluster from Cd16 was cloned, instead. A draft genome sequence of Cd16 was first obtained. A diffocin locus, analogous to that of Cd630, was identified and annotated. The entire diffocin gene cluster from producer strain Cd16 was cloned (SEQ ID NO:1) into a BAC and subsequently demonstrated to include all the genes necessary to produce an active diffocin in a non-pathogenic microorganism and one that is not an obligate anaerobe. C. difficile is both pathogenic and an obligate anaerobic bacterium, making it an impractical production cell for natural diffocins or diffocins modified by recombinant DNA engineering. The isolated diffocin cluster can also be engineered by recombinant DNA technology to have its expression regulated by a heterologous promoter responding to a non-toxic small molecule inducer or de-repressor added to the culture or induction medium of the producer microorganism. Such small molecules include but are not limited to tetracycline, anhydrotetracycline, lactose, arabinose, xylose and their non-metabolized analogs, such as IPTG to replace lactose.
Diffocins are R-type hmw bacteriocins isolated from Clostridium difficile, which are bactericidal against other strains of C. difficile. Diffocins may be isolated from C. difficile strains grown under anaerobic conditions in the presence of mitomycin C. In some embodiments, the diffocin is from C. difficile clinical isolate Cd4, Cd16, Cd19123, Cd19145, Cd19126, Cd19108, or ATCC Cd43593 (termed dif 4, dif 16, dif123, dif145, dif126, dif108, and dif43593, respectively). In one aspect, the diffocin is from Cd4; in another aspect the diffocin is from Cd16.
In another embodiment of the invention, there are provided isolated nucleic acid molecules encoding diffocins derived from the genome of the genus Clostridium bacteria. In one aspect, the nucleic acid molecule contains the gene cluster of SEQ ID NO:1. In another aspect, the nucleic acid molecule contains the gene cluster of SEQ ID NO:61. In other embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule encodes a diffocin that includes one or more polypeptides selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 2-23; 49, 62-80. In still other embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule encodes a diffocin that includes one or more polypeptides selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 4-16, 18, 19, and 66-80. In one aspect, the nucleic acid molecule encodes the polypeptides of SEQ ID NOs: 2-23. In another aspect, the nucleic acid molecule encodes the polypeptides of SEQ ID NOs: 49 and 62-80.
Also provided are variant diffocins. Variant diffocins include those diffocins having an amino acid sequence that are at least 80% identical to a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 4-16, 18, 19, and 66-80. In other embodiments, the variant diffocin has an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or even 99% identical to a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 4-16, 18, 19, and 66-80.
In some embodiments, the variant diffocin may include a heterologous base plate attachment region (BPAR), wherein the BPAR is at least 80% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In another embodiment, the BPAR is at least 85% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In another embodiment, the BPAR is at least 89% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In another embodiment, the BPAR is at least 90% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In still another embodiment, the BPAR is at least 95% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In yet another embodiment, the BPAR is at least 98% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78. In a further embodiment, the BPAR is at least 99% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 16, 54-56, and 78.
In further embodiments, the variant diffocin may include a heterologous receptor binding domain (RBD), wherein the RBD is at least 80% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 80% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 85% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 85% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 89% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 89% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 90% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 90% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 95% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 95% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 98% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 98% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In another embodiment, the RBD is at least 99% identical to the corresponding segment of one or more of SEQ ID NO:17 and 49-53, or at least 99% identical to a polypeptide containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:54-56. In some embodiments, the receptor binding domain (RBD) region comprises amino acid residue 51 to the carboxy-terminal residue of SEQ ID NOs:54, 55, or 56.
In another embodiment, diffocins can be engineered to have altered bactericidal spectra by fusing phage tail RBD to the product of diffocin ORF 1373. While ORF 1374 encodes the primary spectra determinant or RBD of natural diffocins, this very large protein is complexed with the ORF 1373 protein, and ORF 1373 protein provides the BPAR, i.e., it attaches the RBD of ORF 1374 protein to the diffocin baseplate structure. ORF 1373 is analogous to, and shares amino acid sequence identity with, the tail fiber genes of myoviridae bacteriophages such as ΦCD2 (SEQ ID NO:54), ΦCD119 (SEQ ID NO:55), and ΦCD27 (SEQ ID NO:56) as well as with the tail fibers of R-type pyocins. The ORF 1373 (e.g., SEQ ID NOs:16 or 78) of diffocins shares significant sequence identity, particularly in the first 160 amino acids at the N-terminal portion or BPAR, with the tail fibers of the C. difficile myoviridae phage, ΦCD2 (SEQ ID NO:54). The phage tail fibers are, however, longer than diffocin ORF 1373 protein and contain a C-terminal RBD for recognizing their bacterial targets. Diffocins' ORF 1373 proteins do not contain this latter domain, the RBD function of which has been replaced by a separate polypeptide, encoded by ORF1374. Thus, ORF 1374 can be deleted altogether from the diffocin cluster and an RBD of a phage tail fiber, such as that of ΦCD2, can be fused to the diffocin BPAR, encoded by ORF 1373, thereby generating a diffocin that has a phage tail fiber-like protein and accordingly, a bactericidal spectrum related to the host range of the donor phage. Importantly, because the regions of amino acid sequence homology between the C. difficile phage tail fibers and the ORF 1373 protein enable successful functional fusions between the two, one can select host-range variants from mutagenized or non-mutagenized C. difficile phages that can then be sources of novel RBD's for creating modified diffocins with novel bactericidal spectra.
In one embodiment of an engineered diffocin, there is provided a diffocin in which the RBD has been replaced with an RBD from another strain of C. difficile or with an RBD from a bacteriophage that infects C. difficile. In one example, the nucleic acid molecule comprises a sequence encoding SEQ ID NO:16 or 78 but does not contain the corresponding native RBD (i.e., the sequence encoding SEQ ID NO:17 or 49, respectively); instead, the native RBD is replaced with a heterologous sequence encoding an RBD. In particular embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule contains a heterologous sequence encoding a receptor binding domain (RBD) of an R-type bacteriocin of a different strain of C. difficile. In one aspect, the nucleic acid molecule contains a sequence encoding SEQ ID NO:16 or 78 and a sequence encoding a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 49-53 or the receptor binding region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 54-56. In another aspect, the nucleic acid molecule is comprised of a sequence encoding SEQ ID NOs:2-16 and 18-23 or SEQ ID NOs: 62-80, and a heterologous sequence encoding an RBD from a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 17 and 49-56.
In other embodiments of an engineered diffocin, the RBD of the diffocin may be replaced with a modified form of a native RBD. A “native RBD” refers to a RBD having an amino acid sequence that is identical to a RBD isolated or cloned from a strain of C. difficile or from a bacteriophage that infects C. difficile. Exemplary native RBDs from a number of C. difficile strains include SEQ ID NOs: 17 and 49-53. Exemplary native RBDs from bacteriophages that infect C. difficile include SEQ ID NOs: 54-56 (e.g., amino acid residue 51 to the carboxy terminal residue). In some embodiments, a modified RBD includes a change in the amino acid sequence of the RBD relative to a native RBD. Non-limiting examples of a change in amino acid sequence include substitution, insertion (or addition), or deletion of one or more amino acids. In further embodiments, a diffocin includes a substitution with, or insertion of, an RBD derived from an organism that diversifies the structure by deploying a Diversity Generating Retroelement (DGR), as described in published Patent Application US 2006-0121450, published Jun. 8, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth).
In some embodiments, the modified form has a bactericidal spectrum that is different from the corresponding unmodified or native RBD. In particular embodiments, the modified form is at least 80% identical the native RBD. In other embodiments, the RBD has an amino acid sequence that is at least 85%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or even 99% identical to a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 17 and 49-53 or the receptor binding region of a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 54-56 and the modified RBD has a bactericidal spectrum that is different from the corresponding unmodified or native RBD.
Clostridium difficile strains isolated from patients vary widely by pulse gel electrophoresis and in their pathogenicity. The BI/NAP1 or ribotype 027 strains that hyperproduce toxins are particularly virulent as a result of their having lost the function of gene tcdC that negatively regulates the expression level of toxin A and toxin B (McDonald et al., 2005).
In fact, C. difficile strains harboring a specific mutant allele of the tcdC gene have been shown to spread epidemically within and among healthcare facilities. These epidemic and highly virulent strains are especially important target bacteria that could be eliminated prophylactically from the GI tract of carrier patients by oral application of diffocins prior to or shortly after the commencement of traditional antibiotic therapy. C. difficile bacteria that produce wild-type levels of toxins A and B are important target pathogens as well since they are also potentially lethal, particularly to patients older than 50 years or with co-morbidities (Bartlett J G, 2002).
Targeting surface accessible virulence or fitness factors such as S-layer proteins, prevalent on C. difficile strains, whether hyperproducers or not, offer an attractive means of forcing such pathogens to compromise their virulence or fitness if they emerge as resistant to the targeted R-type bacteriocin. Because of the high specificity of the RBD of diffocins, organisms other than C. difficile are not targets, a distinct and powerful advantage of diffocins since they will not cause collateral damage to commensal bacteria of the GI tract—bacteria necessary for normal GI function and good health.
An “infection” refers to growth of bacteria, such as in a subject or tissue or non-bacterial cell, wherein the bacteria actually or potentially could cause disease or a symptom in the subject, tissue or non-bacterial cell. Treatment of an infection may include prophylactic treatment with substances, materials, producer cells, or the spores of detoxified C. difficile bacteria capable of producing diffocins such as dif43593. Non-limiting examples of treated objects include donated organs, tissues, and cells; medical equipment, like a respirator or dialysis machine; or wounds, such as those during or after surgery. Other uses include the removal of target bacteria which may cause problems upon further growth. In additional embodiments, an hmw bacteriocin is used to treat food, plants or harvested parts of plants with bacterial infections or contaminations, or to treat environmental occurrences of the target bacteria, such as in a hospital or commercial setting.
As described herein, an anti-bacterial R-type bacteriocin may be used to inhibit growth, survival, or replication of a particular bacterium. The bacterium may be a pathogenic or environmentally deleterious strain, or may be treated in a prophylactic manner. A pathogenic microorganism generally causes disease, sometimes only in particular circumstances.
Diffocins are particles of approximately 10 million daltons and thus can be isolated and purified by differential centrifugation, differential filtration, aqueous two-phase separations, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and/or ion exchange chromatography to create biopharmaceutical grade oral antibacterial agents. R-type bacteriocins have been found to be stable to freezing-thawing and can be spray dried to create stable formulations.
In some embodiments of the invention, there are provided methods of producing an R-type hmw bacteriocin. The method includes exposing a producer cell to a nucleic acid sequence encoding an R-type hmw bacteriocin operably linked to an inducible promoter sensitive to an inducing agent in a concentration that brings about expression of the R-type bacteriocin, and purifying the expressed R-type bacteriocin. In one aspect, the R-type high molecular weight (hmw) bacteriocin contains one or more polypeptides selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:2-23 or SEQ ID NOs:49 and 62-80. The nucleic acid molecule is heterologous to the natural nucleic acid of the producer cell and may be contained in the producer cell's chromosome or may be contained in an episomal expression vector.
As targeted, potent antibacterial agents, diffocins will be used to remove, or decolonize, C. difficile from the lower GI tract of humans and other animals so as to prevent CDAD. Animals and humans treated with broad spectrum antibiotics are at high risk to develop potentially lethal CDAD if they have been colonized by C. difficile. Decolonization is a particularly attractive utility of diffocins because of their sparing of the healthy GI microbiota. In addition, diffocins can be administered directly or indirectly via administered producer cells or spores of detoxified C. difficile bacteria capable of producing diffocins to reduce the pathogen load in acute CDAD and/or to reduce the high incidence or recurrence or relapse of CDAD after successful treatment by other modalities.
R-type bacteriocins are inactivated by pH 4.0 or lower, the acidity of a normally functioning, fed stomach and upper duodenum. However, diffocins must transit the upper GI tract to reach the targeted bacterial pathogen colonizing predominately the lower GI tract. Thus, diffocins can be formulated by one or several known methods that protect a vulnerable agent from the acid and proteases of the upper GI tract and deliver such agent in an active state to the distal upper GI tract or lower GI tract. In addition, animals can be treated with antihistamines such as cimetidine or proton pump inhibitors to prevent stomach acidification before oral administration of R-type bacteriocins. Thus, oral administration of properly formulated diffocins, producer cells capable of producing diffocins, or spores of diffocin-producing detoxified C. difficile bacteria to humans or animals with normal stomachs or to those in whom the acidification has been pharmaceutically prevented will enable delivery to the colonized portion of the intestine and thereby enable efficacy. Based on bowel transit time, the frequency of per oral administration directly or indirectly of diffocins to decolonize asymptomatic persons or animals may be every 6, every 12, every 18, every 24 hours, weekly, or monthly. Diffocins may also be administered to patients with CDAD, or recently “cured” of CDAD, at frequencies the same or greater. Particularly for management of active CDAD, diffocins may be formulated for and administered directly or indirectly per rectum by suppository, enema or colonic perfusion.
An engineered diffocin of the disclosure may be administered to any subject afflicted with, diagnosed as afflicted with, or suspected of being afflicted with, an infection or contamination by bacteria susceptible to the diffocin. Non-limiting examples of such a subject include animal (mammalian, reptilian, amphibian, avian, and fish) species as well as insects, plants and fungi. Representative, and non-limiting, examples of mammalian species include humans; non-human primates; agriculturally relevant species such as cattle, pigs, goats, and sheep; rodents, such as mice and rats; mammals for companionship, display, or show, such as dogs, cats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and horses; and mammals for work, such as dogs and horses. Representative, and non-limiting, examples of avian species include chickens, ducks, geese, and birds for companionship or show, such as parrots and parakeets. An animal subject treated with an engineered diffocin of the disclosure may also be a quadruped, a biped, an aquatic animal, a vertebrate, or an invertebrate, including insects.
In some embodiments, the subject to be treated is a human child or other young animal which has yet to reach maturity. Thus the disclosure includes the treatment of pediatric conditions comprising infection with bacteria or other microorganism susceptible to a diffocin of the disclosure.
The disclosure also provides for the treatment or prevention of an opportunistic infection, such as that resulting from an undesirable growth of bacteria that are present in the microbial flora of a human subject or a non-human animal. An opportunistic infection may be the result of an immunosuppressed condition in a subject or the result of antibiotic treatment that alter the commensal flora of the genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Thus the disclosure also provides for the treatment or prophylaxis of immunosuppressed subjects and subjects exposed to other pharmaceutical agents. A diffocin with its anti-bacterial activity may be used in combination with another anti-bacterial or anti-microbial agent, such as an antibiotic or anti-fungal agent as non-limiting examples. An “anti-microbial agent” is an agent or compound that can be used to inhibit the growth of, or to kill, single celled organisms. Anti-microbial agents include antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, antibodies (with or without complement), chemical inhibitors of DNA, RNA, protein, lipid, or cell wall synthesis or functions.
In some embodiments, diffocins, producer cells, or spores of detoxified C. difficile bacteria capable of producing diffocins are formulated with a “pharmaceutically acceptable” excipient, enteric coating or carrier. Such a component is one that is suitable for use with humans, animals, and/or plants without undue adverse side effects. Non-limiting examples of adverse side effects include toxicity, irritation, and/or allergic response. The excipient or carrier is typically one that is commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio. Non-limiting pharmaceutically suitable carriers include sterile aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, suspensions, and emulsions. Examples include, but are not limited to, standard pharmaceutical excipients such as a phosphate buffered saline solution, water, emulsions such as oil/water emulsion, and various types of wetting agents. Examples of non-aqueous solvents are propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, vegetable oils such as olive oil, and injectable organic esters such as ethyloleate. Aqueous carriers include water, alcoholic/aqueous solutions, emulsions or suspensions, including saline and buffered media. Parenteral vehicles include sodium chloride solution, Ringer's dextrose, dextrose and sodium chloride, lactated Ringer's or fixed oils. Intravenous vehicles include fluid and nutrient replenishers, electrolyte replenishers (such as those based on Ringer's dextrose), and the like.
Additional formulations and pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein comprise an isolated diffocin specific for a bacterial pathogen; a mixture of two, three, five, ten, or twenty or more different diffocins, producer cells or spores of detoxified C. difficile bacteria capable of producing diffocins that target the same bacterial pathogen; and a mixture of two, three, five, ten, or twenty or more that target different bacterial pathogens or different strains of the same bacterial pathogen.
Optionally, a composition comprising a diffocin or producer cells of the disclosure may also be spray dried or lyophilized using means well known in the art. Subsequent reconstitution and use may be practiced as known in the field.
A diffocin is typically used in an amount or concentration that is “safe and effective”, which refers to a quantity that is sufficient to produce a desired therapeutic response without undue adverse side effects like those described above. A diffocin may also be used in an amount or concentration that is “therapeutically effective”, which refers to an amount effective to yield a desired therapeutic response, such as, but not limited to, an amount effective to slow the rate of bacterial cell division, or to cause cessation of bacterial cell division, or to cause death or decrease rate of population growth of the bacteria. The safe and effective amount or therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount will vary with various factors but may be readily determined by the skilled practitioner without undue experimentation. Non-limiting examples of factors include the particular condition being treated, the physical condition of the subject, the type of subject being treated, the duration of the treatment, the nature of concurrent therapy (if any), and the specific formulations employed.
Having now generally described the inventive subject matter, the same will be more readily understood through reference to the following examples which are provided by way of illustration, and are not intended to be limiting of the disclosure, unless specified.
1. Determination of the Bactericidal Activity of Diffocins.
C. difficile cultures were grown under strict anaerobic conditions in a Forma Scientific environmental chamber with an atmosphere of 10% CO2, 10% H2, 80% N2. All media, buffers, and plates were reduced in this atmosphere for at least 24 hours prior to use. Cultures were streaked on C. difficile selective agar plates (BD Diagnostics, BBL Cat. 222228), and incubated at 37° C. for two days. These plates as stocks were then stored anaerobically at ambient temperature.
To induce diffocins, C. difficile bacteria were grown in liquid cultures using Brucella medium (Difco) at 37° C. with no shaking. At an OD600 of approximately 0.2, mitomycin C was added to a final concentration of 3 μg/ml. Cultures were then incubated for 3-16 hours. Bacterial lysis was detected by a visual clearing of the culture.
Cultures were removed from the anaerobic chamber, and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 5,000× g. The supernatants were then passed through a 0.2 μm cellulose acetate syringe filter. The filtrate was centrifuged at 90,000×g for 2 hours to pellet the diffocin particles. The pellets were resuspended in 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 3% mannitol in 1/50 original culture volume.
Target strains were grown in Brucella broth overnight at 37° C. Culture volumes of 100 μl were added to 5 ml of tempered, reduced, Brucella overlay agar (0.5% agar), poured onto a Brucella agar plate (1.5% agar) and allowed to set. Samples of 5 μl of the diffocin preparations were spotted onto the plates and allowed to air dry (about 30 min). The plates were then incubated anaerobically at 37° C. overnight. Bactericidal activity was determined by a clearing, or lack of bacterial growth, at the position or spot where a sample was applied to the lawn.
2. Cloning of the Cd16 Diffocin Locus.
A draft genome sequence of C. difficile strain Cd16 was obtained by 454 instrument sequence analysis of genomic DNA. The entire dif16 locus or cluster (SEQ ID NO:1) was identified by comparison to strain Cd630 (see above).
Preparing a Backbone BAC Vector.
The starting vector was pETcoco1 (Novagen). This was modified to remove the two XhoI sites with primers AV1419 (SEQ ID NO:24) and AV1420 (SEQ ID NO:25), which have BbsI ends. To do so, a specific region was amplified from pETcoco1 DNA with these primers, and subsequently the PCR product was cut with BbsI and ligated back into the larger pETcoco1 vector fragment that was previously cut with XhoI. This ligation destroyed the two XhoI sites of pETcoco1. This latter plasmid was then further modified by a similar strategy to destroy the EcoRI sites using primers AV1416 (SEQ ID NO:26) and AV1245 (SEQ ID NO:27). The resulting vector was termed SW251.
Preparing a pUC19 Vector to Accept Fragments of the Diffocin Cluster.
The polylinker of pUC19 (New England BioLabs) was modified by digesting with EcoRI and HindIII and ligating in oligos AV1372 (SEQ ID NO:28), AV1373 (SEQ ID NO:29), AV1374 (SEQ ID NO:30), and AV1375 (SEQ ID NO:31). This changed the polylinker to NotI-NheI-KpnI-XhoI-EcoRV-BstBI-BbsI-EcoRI-NsiI-SphI-BamHI-AscI. This was termed SW232.
Cloning the Diffocin Cluster into SW232.
Three fragments of the diffocin cluster, SEQ ID NO 1, were individually amplified by PCR from Cd16 DNA. The 5′ fragment (SEQ ID NO: 32) was amplified with primers 1368 (SEQ ID NO:35) and 1289 (SEQ ID NO:36), which had Not1 and Xho1 ends, respectively. The middle fragment (SEQ ID NO:33) was amplified with primers AV1288 (SEQ ID NO:37) and AV1366 (SEQ ID NO:38), which had Xho1 and EcoR1 ends, respectively. The 3′ fragment, SEQ ID NO:34, was amplified with primers AV1367 (SEQ ID NO:39) and AV1300 (SEQ ID NO:40), which had EcoR1 and BamH1 ends, respectively. These three PCR fragments were separately cloned into SW232, and termed SW241, SW242, and SW243 for the 5′, middle, and 3′ portions, respectively.
Cloning the Diffocin Cluster into the BAC SW251.
The three fragments of the diffocin cluster (in SW241, SW242, and SW243), each having been expanded by cloning in E. coli and purified, were excised from the SW241, SW242, and SW243 vectors. SW241 was digested with NotI and XhoI, SW242 was digested with XhoI and EcoRI, and SW243 was digested with EcoRI and AscI. (Note that this AscI sites was part of the modified SW232 polylinker described above.)
These three fragments were assembled into SW251 that was first digested with NotI and AscI. The resulting plasmid was termed DG461 and contained the entire dif16 cluster. It was amplified in E. coli.
Making a Diffocin Integration Vector for Expression in B. subtilis.
The B. subtilis integration vector, pDR111, which included portions of the amyE gene flanking a cloning/promoter region and a spectinomycin-resistance gene, was used.
The pDR111 polylinker was modified by digesting the vector with HindIII and SphI and ligating in oligos DG1 (SEQ ID NO:41) and DG2 (SEQ ID NO:42). This added NotI and AscI sites to pDR111. The region containing the entire amyE front and back region with the modified polylinker was then amplified using primers DG9 (SEQ ID NO:43) and DG10 (SEQ ID NO:44), which both have BsaI ends. This fragment was ligated into the NotI and AscI sites of SW251 (resulting in destruction of the two sites) and created DG487. Note that there were new NotI and AscI sites introduced into DG487 by the modified poly linker of the pDR111-derived insert.
After expansion of DG487 in E. coli the NotI/AscI fragment containing the diffocin cluster from DG461 was then excised and cloned into the NotI/AscI site of DG487. This new construct was named DG488 and was the vector used to introduce the entire diffocin gene cluster into B. subtilis (below).
3. Expression of a Diffocin Gene Cluster in Bacillus subtilis.
The natural diffocin producer is C. difficile, an obligate anaerobe. If exposed to even traces of oxygen, C. difficile bacteria sporulate and die promptly. The ability to generate even trace amounts of diffocins from cultured C. difficile is difficult and taxing, and certainly the production of quantities of diffocins useful for prophylactic or therapeutic applications is not practical under the required strict anaerobic conditions. Accordingly, the entire diffocin gene cluster from C. difficile was first identified and then isolated by molecular cloning and introduced the cluster into an aerobic gram positive bacterium, Bacillus subtilis, for further engineering and production.
The Bacillus subtilis integration vector, DG488, was made as described in Example 2 and contained the entire 22,827 base diffocin locus (SEQ ID NO:1). This vector was used to recombine the diffocin locus into the Bacillus subtilis genome.
The recipient Bacillus subtilis strain was BDR123, which had a chloramphenicol resistance marker inserted within the amyE gene. When this strain was transformed with DG488, recombination occurred between the front and back amyE sequences within the vector and the genomic amyE sequences. This resulted in insertion, into the BDR123 genome, of all of the sequences between the front and back amyE regions of DG488 including the diffocin locus and the spectinomycin resistance gene. Successful recombinants were spectinomycin resistant but had become chloramphenicol-sensitive due to loss of that genomic marker as a result of the recombination event. This B. subtilis strain was termed BDR123-488.
Since the entire diffocin locus was inserted into the DG488 vector (Example 2), it therefore was also inserted in its entirety into BDR123-488. This inserted diffocin locus included all of the regulatory genes that were required for normal expression in Clostridium, and the structural diffocin particle genes were under control of these genes and/or regulatory elements. Because Bacillus and Clostridium are related bacteria, it was predicted that these diffocin regulatory elements would function in the Bacillus background and, as in their natural state, would be induced by DNA damage through a RecA-mediated mechanism. This in fact was the case, and diffocin particle production was induced in BDR123-488 by contact with the DNA damaging agent mitomycin C and killed strain Cd19099,
Diffocin regulatory genes (ORFs 1359, 1360, 1361) were located in the 5′ region of the locus in relation to the structural genes. There were also regulatory genes (ORFs 1377 (SEQ ID NO:20), 1378 (SEQ ID NO:21), and 1379 (SEQ ID NO:23)) located downstream, 3′ in relation to the structural genes. To eliminate these latter regulatory genes DG491 was generated from DG488 in a single three way ligation. One PCR fragment was made from DG488 by PCR amplification with primers DG13 (SEQ ID NO:45) and DG14 (SEQ ID NO:46), and the other was made by PCR amplification with primers DG15 (SEQ ID NO:47) and DG16 (SEQ ID NO:48). Both PCR fragments were digested with AscI and SphI. DG488 was then digested with SphI, and the two digested PCR fragments were ligated into the large vector fragment from SphI-digested DG488 to produce DG491. DG491 was transformed into BDR123 (BDR123-491) to generate recombinant B. subtilis that contained the diffocin gene cluster lacking orfs1377 (SEQ ID NO:20), 1378 (SEQ ID NO:21), and 1379 (SEQ ID NO:23). The modified diffocin cluster lacking these ORFs expressed active diffocins upon exposure to mitomycin C (
4. Characterization of Bactericidal Spectrum-Determining Sequences from Multiple Diffocins.
A comparison of the Cd16 diffocin locus (SEQ ID NO:1) with that of Cd630 as well as other Cd strains that have been sequenced (QCD-66c26; QCD-23m63; QCD-32g58; QCD-63q42) and Cd4 (SEQ ID NO:61) showed that, with one exception, all of the open reading frames (SEQ ID NOs:1 and 61) shared 89-100% amino acid sequence identity. The exception was ORF 1374. This exceptional sequence was variable among all the sequenced diffocins and although similar in size, shared as little as 30% sequence identity. The position of ORF1374 within the diffocin cluster was consistent with that of a receptor binding domain. The sequences of the ORF1374s of the active diffocins that were isolated were determined and it was found that they too were highly variable in sequence (SEQ ID NO:17, 49-53). A comparison of these sequences is shown in
5. Cloning and Expression of Dif4 in B. subtilis.
The diffocin 4 locus was cloned from Cd4 by methods similar to those for diffocin 16. However, some modifications were required due to the absence of an EcoR1 site within the dif4 gene cluster, SEQ ID NO:61. Plasmid SW251 (see Example 2 above) was modified to have an XhoI site in the polylinker using oligos DG211, SEQ ID NO:57 and DG212, SEQ ID NO:58, to introduce NotI and AscI sites, respectively. This created vector DG577.
The diffocin cluster from Cd4 DNA was amplified in three fragments. The first used primers DG210 (SEQ ID NO:59) and AV1288 (SEQ ID NO:37) to introduce XhoI and NcoI sites. The second used primers DG209 (SEQ ID NO:60) and DG15 (SEQ ID NO:47) to introduce NcoI and AscI sites. These two were cloned into DG577, previously cut with XhoI/AscI to create DG578. The third fragment was amplified using AV1368 (SEQ ID NO:35) and AV1289 (SEQ ID NO:36) to introduce XhoI and NotI sites and cloned into DG578, previously cut with XhoI and NotI to create DG579. This latter construct containing the dif4 cluster (SEQ ID NO:61) was the equivalent of DG491 for dif16, i.e. it lacked orf1377, orf1378 and orf1379, the unnecessary presumed regulatory sequences downstream of the structural genes for diffocin. The integration vector for introducing the dif4 cluster into B. subtilis was made by taking the NotI AscI fragment from DG579 and cloning it into DG487 (see Example 2 above). This constructed plasmid was DG580.
To express dif4 in B. subtilis, DG580, which contained the dif4 locus without orf1377-1379 (SEQ ID NO:61), was recombined into the Bacillus subtilis genome. The recipient Bacillus subtilis strain was BDR123, which had a chloramphenicol resistance marker inserted within the amyE gene. When this strain was transformed with DG580, recombination occurred between the front and back amyE sequences within the vector and the genomic amyE sequences. This resulted in insertion, into the BDR123 genome, of all of the sequences between the front and back amyE regions of DG580 including the diffocin locus and the spectinomycin resistance gene. Successful recombinants were spectinomycin resistant but had become chloramphenicol-sensitive due to loss of that genomic marker as a result of the recombination event. This B. subtilis strain was termed BDR123-580.
This integrated dif4 locus included all of the regulatory genes required for normal diffocin expression in C. difficile, and as expected and shown previously for dif16 in B. subtilis, dif4 particle production was induced in BDR123-580 by contact with mitomycin C,
6. Orf1374 Determines the Bactericidal Spectra of Diffocins.
Orf 1374 encodes a large predicted polypeptide (˜200 kDa) that was shown by mass spectrometry to be part of the purified diffocin structure. When comparing the gene clusters of diffocins 16 and diffocin 4, most of the gene products, particularly those that are predicted to be structural components, are nearly identical at the amino acid level. The major amino acid sequence difference between the two clusters is orf1374. For this reason and other reasons discussed below, it was speculated that this gene product confers the target specificity of the diffocins. To test this, Orf 1374 of dif 4 (i.e., the sequence encoding SEQ ID NO:49) was replaced in DG580 with Orf 1374 from Cd16 (i.e., the sequence encoding SEQ ID NO:17) to create DG587. DG587 was integrated into the genome of B. subtilis BDR123 to make a BDR123-587 recombinant, as provided above for dif16 and dif4. The resulting BDR123-587 was exposed to mitomycin and the lysate treated so as to prepare diffocins. The resulting diffocin particles had bactericidal activity against C. difficile strain 19145, which was sensitive to diffocin 16, and had lost the ability to kill strain 19137, which was sensitive to dif4 (
7. Producer Cell Without PBSX That Does Not Lyse When RecA is Activated.
The PBSX prophage is ubiquitous in wild type Bacillus subtilis. The prophage when induced is defective in that it possesses a stunted head structure and contains only small, random fragments of DNA. It is under the control of RecA, thus it is induced by DNA damaging agents, e.g. mitomycin C, and other forms of severe stress to the bacterium. When induced it causes lysis of the bacterium and releases PBSX particles. In order to avoid contamination of culture medium with PBSX particles and to eliminate lysis of the Bacillus subtilis producer bacteria when the expression of diffocins is regulated by modifying recA or dinR/lexA activity, the PBSX gene cluster was eliminated from Bacillus subtilis BDR11 bacteria.
The PBSX knockout was constructed by following the procedure outlined in Liu et al. Briefly, using the primers and overlapped extension PCR techniques used in the Liu paper, the araR gene of parental strain BDR11 was deleted and replaced with the neomycin/kanamycin-resistance gene under the Bacillus arabinose promoter, ParaA-neoR, to make strain BDG2. This deletion of the araR gene was confirmed by PCR and by the conferral of resistance to kanamycin.
Next, a DNA construct was made to delete the PBSX locus itself. To make this construct, the following five PCR products were spliced by overlapped extension PCR into one large product: 1 kb of sequence 5′ of the xylB gene, amplified from BDR11; 1 kb of sequence 3′ of the xylA gene, amplified from BDR11; a chloramphenicol resistance gene, cat, amplified from plasmid pJW034; araR, amplified from BDR11; and finally, 1 kb of sequence containing the xylB gene, amplified from BDR11. The overlapped extension PCR product was cloned into the XmaI and SpeI sites of pUC19. This construct was then linearized with SacII and transformed into strain BDG2 bacteria, which were plated onto LB agar plates supplemented with 5 μg chloramphenicol/ml. Colonies were picked from this plate and patched onto LB agar plates supplemented with either 5 μg chloramphenicol/ml or 20 μg kanamycin/ml. Strains that were chloramphenicol resistant and kanamycin sensitive were grown for 4 hours in LB broth with no antibiotic selection and then plated onto LB agar plates supplemented with 20 μg kanamycin/ml. The colonies that grew on these plates were tested by colony PCR for the presence of PBSX genes. The deletion of the PBSX gene cluster was confirmed in strain BDG 9 by sequencing PCR products that spanned the site of PBSX genes in wt strain BD123. Further analysis showed that unlike Bacillus subtilis strains BD123 or BDG2, BDG9 did not lyse or produce PBSX particles in the presence of 3 μg mitomycin C/ml.
The PBSX deletion strain, BDG9, was transformed with plasmid DG580, to create BDG27. Integration of the Cd4 diffocin cluster was confirmed by spectinomycin resistance. BDG27 was grown and induced with mitomycin C as described above. After 16 hours cells were harvested and lysed with BugBuster (Novagen) to break open the cells since, without PBSX, we expected the diffocins to accumulate intracellularly. After lysing the cells with BugBuster, debris was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was tested for bactericidal activity against strain 19137. The diffocin produced by BDG27 showed activity against Cd19137 but not Cd19099, thus demonstrating that diffocin 4 was produced in this non-lytic, PBSX deleted strain.
The term “comprising”, which is used interchangeably with “including,” “containing,” or “characterized by,” is inclusive or open-ended language and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. The phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim. The phrase “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed invention. The present disclosure contemplates embodiments of the invention compositions and methods corresponding to the scope of each of these phrases. Thus, a composition or method comprising recited elements or steps contemplates particular embodiments in which the composition or method consists essentially of or consists of those elements or steps.
All references cited herein, including patents, patent applications, and publications, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties, whether previously specifically incorporated or not.
Having now fully described this invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the same can be performed within a wide range of equivalent parameters, concentrations, and conditions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention and without undue experimentation.
While this invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth.
Although the invention has been described with reference to the above examples, it will be understood that modifications and variations are encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the following claims.
Govind, R, J A Fralick, and R D Rolfe, 2006. Genomic organization and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile bacteriophage phiCD119. J. Bacteriol. 188:2568-2577.
Jabrane, A., A. Sabri, P. Compe're, P. Jacques, I. Vandenberghe, J. Van Beeumen, and P. Thenart. 2002. Characterization of serracin P, a phagetail-like bacteriocin, and its activity against Erwinia amylovora, the fire blight pathogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5704-5710.
Kageyama et al. Life Sciences 9:471-476, 1962.
Kageyama, M., K. Ikeda, and F. Egami. 1964. Studies of a pyocin. III. Biological properties of the pyocin. J. Biochem. 55:59-64.
Kageyama, M., K. Ikeda, and F. Egami. 1964a. Studies of a pyocin. I. Physical and chemical properties. J. Biochem. 55:49-53.
Kageyama, M. 1975. Bacteriocins and bacteriophages in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, p. 291-305. In T. Mitsuhashi and H. Hashimoto (ed.), Microbial drug resistance. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.
Keel, K, J S Brazier, K W Post, S Weese and J G Songer, 2007. Prevalence of PCR Ribotypes Among Clostridium Difficile Isolates from Pigs, Calves, and Other Species J. Clinical Microbiology, 45: 1963-1964.
Kingsbury, D, 1966. Bacteriocin production by strains of Neisseria meningitidis.” J Bacteriol. 91:1696-9.
Krogh, S, M O'Reilly, N Nolan and K M Devine, 1996. The phage-like element PBSX and part of the skin element, which are resident at different locations on the Bacillus subtilis chromosome, are highly homologous. Microbiology 142: 2031-2040
Liu S, Endo K, Ara K, Ozaki K, Ogasawara N. 2008. Introduction of marker-free deletions in Bacillus subtilis using the AraR repressor and the ara promoter. Microbiology. 154: 2562-70.
Loo V G, Poirier L, Miller M A, Oughton M, Libman M D, Michaud S, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:2442-9.
McDonald L C, Killgore G E, Thompson A, Owens R C Jr, Kazakova S V, Sambol S P, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:2433-41.
Morse, S. A., B. V. Jones, and P. G. Lysko. 1980. Pyocin of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: mechanism of action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:416-423.
Muto C A, Pokrywka M, Shutt K, Mendelsohn M B, Nouri K, Posey K, et al. A large outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with an unexpected proportion of deaths and colectomies at a teaching hospital following increased fluoroquinolone use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005; 26:273-80.
Nieves, B M, F Gil and F J Castillo, 1981. Growth inhibition activity and bacteriophage and bacteriocinlike particles associated with different species of Clostridium. Can. J. Microbiol. 27: 216-225.
Pépin J, Valiquette L, Alary M E, Villemure P, Pelletier A, Forget K, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ. 2004; 171:466-72.
Scholl, D, and D W Martin, Jr., 2008. Antibacterial efficacy of R-type pyocins towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a mouse peritonitis model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1647-1652.
Scholl, D, M Cooley, S R Williams, D Gebhart, D Martin, A Bates, and R Mandrell, 2009. An Engineered R-Type Pyocin Is a Highly Specific and Sensitive Bactericidal Agent for the Food-Borne Pathogen Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3074-3080.
Strauch, E., H. Kaspar, C. Schaudinn, P. Dersch, K. Madela, C. Gewinner, S. Hertwig, J. Wecke, and B. Appel. 2001. Characterization of enterocoliticin, a phage tail-like bacteriocin, and its effect on pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5634-5642;
Sunenshine, R H & L C McDonald, 2006. Clostridium difficile-associated disease: New challenges from an established pathogen, Cleveland Clinic J. of Medicine, 73: 187.
Williams, S., D. Gebhart, D. W. Martin, and D. Scholl. 2008. Re-targeting R-type pyocins to generate novel bactericidal protein complexes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3868-3876.
Wood, H E, M T Dawson, K M Devine, D J McConell, 1990. Characterization of PBSX, a Defective Prophage of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriology 172: 2667-2674.
Zilberberg, M D, Tillotson, G S and McDonald, L C., 2010 Clostridium difficile Infections Among Hospitalized Children, United States, 1997-2006. Emerging Infect Dis 16: 604-609.
Zink, R., M. J. Loessner, and S. Schere. 1995. Characterization of cryptic prophages (monocins) in Listeria and sequence analysis of a holin/endolysin gene. Microbiology 141:2577-2584.
This application claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/349,145, filed May 27, 2010, currently pending, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7585957 | Miller et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7700729 | Scholl et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7732586 | Martin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 8206971 | Scholl et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 20080171376 | Scholl et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO0101786 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO02077183 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2011150342 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Steven R. Williams et al., Retargeting R-Type Pyocins to Generate Novel Bactericidal Protein Complexes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Jun. 2008, p. 3868-3876. |
| Dana Gebhart,et al., Novel high molecular weight, R-type bacteriocins of Clostridium difficile. J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01272-12. Published online ahead of print on Sep. 14, 2012. pp. 1-40. |
| Mohammed Sebaihia et al.The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nature Genetics vol. 38 [No. 7 [Jul. 2006 779-786. |
| Lidia Westers et al., Bacillus subtilis as cell factory for pharmaceutical proteins: a biotechnological approach to optimize the host organism. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1694 (2004) 299-310. |
| Pulvirenti et al., Difference in the Incidence of Clostridium difficile Among Patients Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Admitted to a Public Hospital and a Private Hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 23, No. 11 (Nov. 2002), pp. 641-647. |
| Database EMBL [Online] Oct. 1, 2009, “Clostridium difficile R20291 complete genome,” XP00000268912, retrieved from EBI Accession No. EM—PRO: FN545816 p. 638-p. 641; sequence. |
| Database UniProt [Online] Nov. 24, 2009, “Subname: Full=Putative phage tail fiber protein;”, XP000002658913, retrieved from EBI Accession No. UNIPORT: C9XPN8 the whole document. |
| Database UniProt [Online] Nov. 24, 2009 “Subname: Full=Putative phage protein;” XP000002658914, retrieved from EBI Accession No. UNIPROT: C9YKW6 Database accession No. C9YKW6 sequence A13. |
| Anastasio, KL, JA Soucheck and H Sugiyama, 1971. “Boticinogeny and Actions of the Bacteriocin,” J. of Bacteriology, 107 143-149. |
| Blackwell, C.C. and J.A. Law, 1981. Typing of Non-Serogroupable Neisseria meningitidis by Means of Sensitivity to R-Type Pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Infect. 3(4): 370-378. |
| Blackwell, C.C., F.P. Wistanley, and W.A. Telfer-Brunton, 1982. “Sensitivity of Thermophilic Campylobacters to R-Type Pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” J. Med. Microbiol. 15:247-251. |
| Bradley, DE, “Ultrastructure of Bacteriphage and Bacteriocins,” Bacteriol. Rev. 21:230-314, 1967. |
| Campagnari, A.A.R. Karalus, M. Apicella, W. Melaugh, A.J. Lesse, and B.W. Gibson, 1994. Use of Pyocin to Select a Haemophilus ducreyi Variant Defective in Lipooligosaccharide Biosynthesis, Infect. Immun. 62:2379-2386. |
| Coetzee, H.L., H.C. De Klerk, J.N. Coetzee, and J.A. Smit. 1968. “Bacteriophage-tail-like Particles Associated With. Intra-species Killing of Proteus vulgaris,” J. Gen. Virol. 2:29-36. |
| Daw, MA, and FR Falkiner, 1996. “Bacteriocins: Nature, Function, and Structure,” Review Article. Micron. 27:467-479. |
| Ellison, JS and JA Kautter, 1970. “Purification and Some Properties of Two Boticins,” J. of Bacteriology, 104: 19-26. |
| Filiatrault, M.J., R.S. Munson, Jr., and A.A. Campagnari, 2001. “Genetic Analysis of A Pyocin-Resistant Lipooligosaccharide (LOS) mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi: Restoration of Full-Length LOS Restores Pyocin Sensitivity,” J. Inhibition. Bacteriol. 183: 5756-5761. |
| Fortier, LC and S Moineau, 2007. “Morphological and Genetic Diversity of Temperate Phages In Clostridium difficile,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7358-7366. |
| Goh, S., PF Ong, KP Song, TV Riley and BJ Chang, 2007. “The Complete Genome Sequence of Clostridium difficile Phage and PhiC2 and Comparisons to phiCD119 and Inducible Prophages of CD630,” Microbiology, 153:676-685. |
| Govind, R, JA Fralick, and RD Rolfe, 2006. “Genomic Organization and Molecular Characterization of Clostridium difficile Bacteriophage phiCD119,” J. Bacteriol. 188:2568-2577. |
| Jabrane, A., A. Sabri, P. Comp re, P. Jacques, I. Vandenberghe, J. Van Beeumen, and P. Thenart. 2002. “Characterization of Serracin P, a Phagetail-like Bacteriocin, and its Activity Against Erwinia amylovora, the Fire Blight Pathogen,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5704-5710. |
| Kageyama, et al, Life Sciences 9:471-476, 1962. |
| Kageyama, M. 1975. “Bacteriocins and Bacteriophages in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” 291-305. In T. Mitsuhashi and H. Hashimoto (ed.), Microbial Drug Resistance. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan. |
| Kageyama, M. K. Ikeda, and F. Egami, 1964. “Studies of a Pyocin. III. Biological Properties of the Pyocin,” J. Biochem. 55:59-64. |
| Sell, et al. 1983. “Bacteriophage and Bacteriocin Typing Scheme for Clostridium difficile,” J. Clin. Microb. 17(6): 1148-1152. |
| Kageyama, M. Ikeda, and F. Egami. 1964. “Studies of a Pyocin I. Physical and Chemical Properties,” J. Biochem. 55:49-53. |
| Kingsbury, D., 1966. “Bacteriocin Production by Strains of Neisseria meningitidis,” J. Bacteriol. 91:1696-1699. |
| Krogh, S., M. O'Reilly, N. Nolan, and KM Devine, 1996. “The Phage-like Element PBSX and Part of the Skin Element, Which are Resident at Different Locations on the Bacillus subtilis Chromosome, are Highly Homologous, ” Microbiology. 142:2031-2040. |
| Liu, S., Endo K., Ara K, Ozaki K, Ogasawara N. 2008. “Introduction of Marker-Free Deletions in Bacillus subtilis Using the AraR Repressor and the ara Promoter.” Microbiology, 154:2562-2570. |
| Long, J. et al, 2008. “Differential Requirements of Two recA Mutants for Constitutive SOS Expression in Escherichia coli K-12,” PLos ONE 3(12): e-4100. DOi: 10. 1371/journal.pone. 0004100. |
| Loo VG, Poirier L., Miller MA, Oughton M., Libman MD, Michaud S., et al. “A Predominantly Clonal Multi-Institutional Outbreak of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea With High Morbidity and Mortality, ” N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 353:2442-2449. |
| Morse, S.A., B.V. Jones, and P.G. Lysko. 1980. “Pyocin of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae: Mechanism of Action,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:416-423. |
| Nieves, BM, F. Gil and FJ Castillo, 1981. “Growth Inhibition Activity and Bacteriophage and Bacteriocinlike Particles Associated With Different Species of Clostridium,” Can. J. Microbiol. 27:216-225. |
| Scholl, D., and DW Martin, Jr. 2008. “Antibacterial Efficacy of R-Type Pyocins Towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Murine Peritonitis Model,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1647-1652. |
| Scholl, D., M. Cooley, SR Williams, D. Gebhart, D. Martin, A. Bates, and R. Mandrell, 2009. “An Engineered R-Type Pyocin is a Highly Specific and Sensitive Bactericidal Agent for the Food-Borne Pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7,” Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3074-3080. |
| Strauch, E., H. Kaspar, C. Schaudinn, P. Dersch, K. Madela, C. Gewinner, S. Hertwig, J. Wecke, and B. Appel. 2001. “Characterization of Enterocoliticin, a Phage Tail-Like Bacteriocin and Its Effect on Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Strains,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5634-5642. |
| Williams, S., D.Gebhart, D.W. Martin, D. Scholl. 2008. “Re-Targeting R-Type Pyocins to Generate Novel Bactericidal Protein Complexes,” Appl. Envrion. Microbiol. 74:3868-3876. |
| Thompson, N. et al., “Genetic Transformation in Staphylococcus aureus: Demonstration of a Competence-Conferring Factor of Bacteriophage Origin in Bacteriphage 80a Lysates,” J. Bacteriology, 148:294-300, 1981. |
| Wood, HE, MT Dawson, KM Devine, D.J. McConell, 1990. “Characterization of PBSX, A Defective Prophage of Bacillus subtilis,” J. Bacteriology 172:2667-2674. |
| Zink, R., M.J. Loessner, and S. Schere. 1995. “Characterization of Cryptic Prophages (monocins) In Listeria and Sequence Analysis of a Holin/Endolysin Gene,” Microbiology 141:2577-2584. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110293566 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61349145 | May 2010 | US |
