The present invention relates to a diffractive optical element used for an optical system such as a digital camera.
A diffractive optical element having a saw-tooth diffraction grating is known as an optical element used to reduce the chromatic aberration of an optical system. When a diffractive optical element is used for the optical system, it is important to reduce flare arising when light is reflected or refracted by a wall surface of the diffraction grating.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-170594 discusses a technique for reducing flare by forming a diffractive optical element in such a manner that a grating wall surface of the diffractive optical element becomes parallel with incident light.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a diffractive optical element includes a first lens having a convex surface, a second lens having a concave surface, disposed in such a manner that the concave surface of the second lens faces the convex surface of the first lens, and a diffraction grating section formed between the first and the second lenses and having positive optical power through diffraction, wherein the diffraction grating section includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating disposed in this order from a side closer to the first lens, the second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating, and wherein an inner diameter of an arbitrary grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section decreases as approaching to the second lens from the first lens.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a diffractive optical element includes a first lens having a convex surface, a second lens having a concave surface, disposed in such a manner that the concave surface of the second lens faces the convex surface of the first lens, and a diffraction grating section formed between the first and the second lenses and having positive optical power through diffraction, wherein the diffraction grating section includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating disposed in this order from a side closer to the first lens, the second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating, and wherein the following conditional expression is satisfied:
θH×θM<0
where θH is an angle formed by an arbitrary grating wall surface and an optical axis, and θM is an angle formed by the optical axis and a normal to an enveloping surface of the first diffraction grating, the enveloping surface formed by connecting apical portions of the first diffraction grating, at a position where the arbitrary grating wall surface contacts the enveloping surface, wherein the angle is negative when measured in the clockwise direction with respect to the optical axis, and positive when measured in the counterclockwise direction with respect to the optical axis, such that angles θH and θM have different signs.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described below.
A diffraction grating section 14 is formed between the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 in a space where the concave surface of the second lens 13 faces the convex surface of the first lens 12. When the DOE 10 is used for an optical system, the DOE 10 is disposed in such a manner that the first lens 12 is disposed on the object side of the second lens 13. More specifically, incident light enters the DOE 10 from the side of the first lens 12, such that the incident light is diffracted by the diffraction grating section 14.
Both of the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16 are concentrically shaped centered on the optical axis OL. A lens action can be given to the diffraction grating section 14 by changing the grating pitch (distance between adjoining grating wall surfaces 14b) of the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16. In the DOE 10 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 14 is positive.
Now, the grating wall surface 14b of the diffraction grating section 14 will be described. As illustrated in
From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface 14b satisfies the following formula (1).
θH×θM<0 (1)
where θH is the angle formed by the grating wall surface 14b and the optical axis OL, and θM is the angle formed by the optical axis OL and a normal 2 to an enveloping surface 19 of the first grating (the enveloping surface is formed by connecting apical portions of the first diffraction grating 15) at the position where the grating wall surface 14b contacts the enveloping surface 19.
Referring to the formula (1), the angle is negative when measured in the clockwise direction with respect to the optical axis, and positive when measured in the counterclockwise direction with respect to the optical axis. Formula (1) means that angles θH and θM have different signs.
Inclining the grating wall surface 14b with respect to the optical axis OL in this manner enables reducing the angle formed by incident light 18 and the grating wall surface 14b when the incident light 18 enters the diffraction grating section 14 as convergence light from the side of the first lens 12. This enables reducing the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface 14b out of the incident light 18 and reducing flare generation caused by the grating wall surface 14b.
Next, the diffraction efficiency of light in the diffraction grating section 14 of the DOE 10 will be described.
The condition under which the diffraction efficiency of the m-th order diffraction light in the DOE 10 is maximized is given by the formula (2).
φ(λ)=(NR(λ)−NL(λ))×d=mλ (2)
where λ is the wavelength, NL(λ) is the refractive index of the first diffraction grating 15, and NR(λ) is the refractive index of the second diffraction grating 16.
φ(λ) denotes the optical path length difference in the diffraction grating section 14. d denotes the distance between the enveloping surface 19 of the apical portions of the first diffraction grating 15 and the enveloping surface of the apical portions of the second diffraction grating 16, and is equivalent to the grating height of the diffraction grating section 14. Referring to the formula (2), m denotes the diffraction order represented by an arbitrary integral value. The diffraction order of the diffraction light diffracted in the direction toward the optical axis with respect to the 0th order diffraction light is positive, and the diffraction order of the diffraction light diffracted in the direction away from the optical axis with respect to the 0th order diffraction light is negative.
Referring to the formula (2), forming the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16 by using materials having different refractive indices and suitably designing the grating height d enable improving the diffraction efficiency at an arbitrary wavelength. To improve the diffraction efficiency in a wider wavelength band, it is necessary to form the diffraction grating section 14 by combining a material having a relatively high refractive index and low dispersion with a material having a relatively low refractive index and high dispersion.
From the viewpoint of improving the diffraction efficiency, whichever the first diffraction grating 15 or the second diffraction grating 16 in the diffraction grating section 14 may be provided with a relatively high refractive index. However, in the DOE 10 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the refractive index of the second diffraction grating 16 is made larger than the refractive index of the first diffraction grating 15 to facilitate the manufacturing of the DOE 10 while reducing flare generation. The configuration of the present invention will be described below with reference to a comparative example.
When positive optical power is given to the diffraction grating section 14, the inclination of the grating surface 14a is determined by the magnitude relationship between the refractive indices of the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16. When the refractive index of the second diffraction grating 16 is made larger than the refractive index of the first diffraction grating 15, the grating surface 14a of the diffraction grating section 14 having positive optical power has a shape as illustrated in
The grating wall surface 14b of the diffraction grating section 14 has a shape inclined relative to the optical axis as described above to reduce flare. Therefore, as illustrated in
Although a diffraction grating is generally manufactured by forming resin using a mold, the DOE 10 according to the present exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In the DOE 20 according to the first comparative example, similar to the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment, the grating wall surface 24b is inclined to decrease the angle formed by the incident light and the grating wall surface 24b. However, as illustrated in
On the other hand, in the DOE 20 according to the first comparative example, when the grating wall surface 24b is inclined as illustrated in
A case where the shapes of the first and the second lenses are different from those in the DOE 10 with reference to a second comparative example.
However, as illustrated in
As described above, unlike the DOE 20 according to the first comparative example and the DOE 30 according to the second comparative example, the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment can be easily manufactured while reducing flare generation. In the diffraction grating section 14 having positive optical power formed on a curved surface having a center of curvature on the light incident side, the grating wall surface 14b is inclined in such a manner that the refractive index of the second diffraction grating 16 is made larger than the refractive index of the first diffraction grating 15 and accordingly the angle formed by the grating wall surface 4b and the incident light decreases.
To facilitate the manufacturing of the DOE 10 while reducing flare generation, it is desirable that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface 14b gradually decreases as the grating wall surface 14b comes closer from the first lens 12 to the second lens 13 with at least 50 percent of all the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14. It is more desirable that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface 14b gradually decreases as the grating wall surface 14b comes closer from the first lens 12 to the second lens 13 with at least 70 percent of all the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14, still more desirably, with all of the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14.
From another viewpoint, to facilitate the manufacturing of the DOE 10 while reducing flare generation, it is desirable that the grating wall surface 14b is inclined to satisfy the formula (1) with at least 50 percent of all the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14. It is more desirable that the grating wall surface 14b is inclined to satisfy the formula (1) with at least 70 percent of all the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14, still more desirably, with all of the annulars of the diffraction grating section 14.
With the DOE 10, it is desirable that the first lens 12 is a positive lens. A positive lens refers to a convex lens of which the thickness decreases with increasing distance from the optical axis. As described above, the first lens 12 has a convex surface. Therefore, when a negative lens is used as the first lens 12, the absolute value of the curvature of the lens surface of the first lens 12 on the side where the diffraction grating section 14 is not formed will be too large. In this case, the amount of aberration on the lens surface of the first lens 12 on the side where the diffraction grating section 14 is not formed will increase.
With the DOE 10, it is desirable that the second lens 13 is a negative lens. A negative lens refers to a concave lens of which the thickness increases with increasing distance from the optical axis. As described above, the second lens 13 has a concave surface. Therefore, when a positive lens is used as the second lens 13, the absolute value of the curvature of the lens surface of the second lens 13 on the side where the diffraction grating section 14 is not formed will be too large. In this case, the amount of aberration on the lens surface of the second lens 13 on the side where the diffraction grating section 14 is not formed will increase.
It is desirable that the following conditional expression (3) is satisfied.
20<υLL−υLR<60 (3)
where υLL is the Abbe number of the first lens 12, and υLR is the Abbe number of the second lens 13.
The Abbe number υd is given by υd=(Nd−1)/(NF−NC), where Ng, NF, Nd, and NC are refractive indices for the Fraunhofer g line (435.8 nm), F line (486.1 nm), d line (587.6 nm), and C line (656.3 nm), respectively.
When the difference between υLL and υLR is small, to sufficiently correct the chromatic aberration by using the DOE 10, it is necessary to increase the absolute value of the curvature of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed. When the difference between υLL and υLR, (υLL×υLR), falls below the lower limit of the formula (3), the absolute values of the curvatures of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed will be too large, and the incident angle of light incident on the diffraction grating section 14 will be too large. In this case, the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface 14b increases, making it difficult to sufficiently reduce flare.
On the other hand, when the difference between υLL and υLR, (υLL−υLR), exceeds the upper limit of the formula (3), the curvatures of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed will be too small, making it difficult to correct the spherical aberration.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (3) is set within the range of the following formula (3a), more desirably, set within the range of the formula (3b).
27<υLL−υLR<55 (3a)
30<υLL−LR<53 (3b)
It is desirable that the following formula (4) is satisfied.
0.8<NL/NLL<1.2 (4)
where NLL is the refractive index of the first lens 12 for the d line, and NL is the refractive index of the first diffraction grating 15 for the d line.
When NL is smaller than NLL, the interface between the first lens 12 and the first diffraction grating 15 has positive refractive power. When NL is smaller than NLL to such an extent that NL/NLL falls below the lower limit of the formula (4), light that entered the DOE 10 is largely diffracted at the interface between the first lens 12 and the first diffraction grating 15. As a result, the incident angle of light incident on the diffraction grating section 14 will be too large. In this case, the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface 14b increases, making it difficult to sufficiently reduce flare.
On the other hand, when the refractive index NL of the first diffraction grating 15 is larger than the refractive index NLL of the first lens 12 to such an extent that NL/NLL exceeds the upper limit of the formula (4), the range of options for the materials to be used for the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16 will be narrowed. As a result, it becomes difficult to acquire high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (4) is set within the range of the following formula (4a).
0.9<NL/NLL<1.1 (4a)
The angle formed by the arbitrary grating wall surface 14b and the surface normal 2 of an enveloping surface 19 (formed by connecting apical portions of the first diffraction grating 15) at the position where the grating wall surface 14b contacts the enveloping surface 19 has an absolute angle value θHM. In this case, it is desirable that the following conditional expression (5) is satisfied.
5 degrees<ΔθHM<45 degrees (5)
where ΔθHM is the absolute value of the difference between the maximum and the minimum values of θHM in the diffraction grating section 14.
A decrease in the value of the formula (5), ΔθHM, is equivalent to an increase in the curvature radius of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed. When the curvature radii of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed are large to such an extent that ΔθHM falls below the lower limit of the formula (5), it becomes difficult to correct aberrations such as the spherical aberration.
On the other hand, when the curvature radii of the lens surfaces of the first lens 12 and the second lens 13 on the sides where the diffraction grating section 14 is formed are small to such an extent that ΔθHM exceeds the upper limit of the formula (5), the incident angle of light incident on the diffraction grating section 14 will be too large. In this case, it becomes difficult to reduce flare generation in the diffraction grating section 14.
It is desirable that the range of the value of the formula (5) is set within the range of the following formula (5a).
10 degrees<ΔθHM<40 degrees (5a)
It is desirable that at least one of the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16 is formed of resin. Since it is easy to form resin by using a mold, forming at least one of the first diffraction grating 15 and the second diffraction grating 16 with resin facilitates the forming of the diffraction grating section 14.
Although, in the DOE 10 illustrated in
Optical systems according to second to sixth exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described below.
An optical system according to each exemplary embodiment is an imaging optical system used for an imaging apparatus such as a video camera, digital still camera, and silver-halide film camera.
An optical system according to the second exemplary embodiment will be described below.
The first lens group L1 includes a DOE 110 arranged on the image side of one or more lenses. Using the DOE 110 as an optical system enables suitably correcting aberrations such as the chromatic aberration.
As illustrated in
The configuration of the diffraction grating section 114 is similar to the configuration of the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. More specifically, the diffraction grating section 114 includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating in this order from the first lens 112. The optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 114 is positive.
Each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 114 is inclined relative to the optical axis in such a manner that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface gradually decreases as the grating wall surface comes closer from the first lens 112 to the second lens 113. From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 114 is inclined to satisfy the formula (1).
For each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 114 of the DOE 110, relations between the distance from the grating wall surface to the optical axis, and respective θH (degrees), θM (degrees), and θHM (degrees) are illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the DOE 110 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the first diffraction grating is formed of resin (Nd=1.566, υd=19.0, and θgF=0.418) made of a mixture of acrylic resin and Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) fine particles. θgF denotes the partial dispersion ratio and is given by the following formula (6).
θgF=(Ng−NF)/(NF-NC) (6)
where Ng, NF, Nd, and NC are the refractive indices for the Fraunhofer g line, F line, d line, and C line, respectively.
The second diffraction grating is formed of resin (Nd=1.619, υd=43.2, and θgF=0.564) made of a mixture of acrylic resin and Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) fine particles. The grating height d is 10.79 μm.
Forming the first and second diffraction gratings by using such materials enables obtaining high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
As illustrated in
To further improve the effect of correcting the chromatic aberration by the DOE 110, it is desirable to dispose the DOE 110 at a position where a large diameter of the luminous flux of axial ray is provided. Generally, the diameter of the luminous flux of axial ray in a telephoto lens is larger on the object side of the aperture diaphragm SP than on the image side thereof. Therefore, it is more desirable to dispose the DOE 110 on the object side of the aperture diaphragm SP.
The partial optical system composed of all of the lenses disposed on the object side of the DOE 110 has positive refractive power. When the refractive power of the partial optical system disposed on the object side of the DOE 110 is positive, the axial ray will enter the DOE 110 as convergence (convergent) light. This enables reducing the angle formed by the grating wall surface of the DOE 110 and the incident light, making it possible to effectively reduce flare. When only one lens is disposed on the object side of the DOE 110, the lens serves as a partial optical system disposed on the object side of the DOE 110.
It is desirable that the following conditional expression (7) is satisfied.
0.10<Ld/Lt<0.50 (7)
where Ld is the distance on the optical axis from the lens surface of the optical system on the most object side to the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed, and Lt is the total length of the optical system. Lt is the distance on the optical axis from the lens surface of the optical system on the most object side to the image plane.
Although, as described above, disposing the DOE 110 on the object side of the aperture diaphragm SP enables more effectively correcting the chromatic aberration, light that does not normally reach the image plane (unnecessary light), such as light from the outside of the imaging field angle, is likely to enter the DOE 110. If such unnecessary light that entered the DOE 110 is reflected on the grating wall surface, the unnecessary light reaches the image plane and produces flare. When Ld is small to such an extent that Ld/Lt falls below the lower limit of the formula (7), unnecessary light other than the imaging light is likely to enter the DOE 110, producing flare. On the other hand, when Ld/Lt exceeds the upper limit of the formula (7), the diameter of the luminous flux of axial ray incident on the DOE 110 decreases, making it difficult to sufficiently correct the chromatic aberration. When Ld/Lt exceeds the upper limit of the formula (7), the optical system will increase in size.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (7) is set within the range of the following formula (7a).
0.20<Ld/Lt<0.45 (7a)
It is desirable that the following conditional expression (8) is satisfied.
−2.0<f/(Rd×Fn)<−0.20 (8)
where Rd is the curvature radius of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed, f is the focal length of the entire optical system, and Fn is the F-number.
When the absolute value of the curvature of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed is large to such an extent that f/(Rd×Fn) falls below the lower limit of the formula (8), the incident angle of light incident on the diffraction grating section 114 will increase. As a result, the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface will increase, making it difficult to reduce flare.
On the other hand, when the absolute value of the curvature of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed is small to such an extent that f/(Rd×Fn) exceeds the upper limit of the formula (8), it becomes difficult to correct aberrations such as the spherical aberration.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (8) is set within the range of the following formula (8a), more desirably, set within the range of the formula (8b).
−1.9<f/(Rd×Fn)<−0.30 (8a)
−1.8<f/(Rd×Fn)<−0.41 (8b)
Further, it is desirable that the following conditional expression (9) is satisfied.
0.6<(E1−Ed)/Ld+Ed×PfEd/Rd<2.0 (9)
where E1 is the effective diameter of the lens surface of the optical system on the most object side, Ed is the effective diameter of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed, and Pf is the refractive power of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side (the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is not formed).
The refractive power Pf of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side is given by the following formula (10).
Pf=(NLL−1)/RLL (10)
where RLL is the curvature radius of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side.
The angle formed by the axial marginal ray and the optical axis when the axial marginal ray that entered the optical system 100 is incident on the first lens 112 can be approximately represented by (E1-Ed)/(2Ld). The angle formed by the travelling directions of the axial marginal ray before and after the axial marginal ray enters the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side can be approximately represented by Ed×Pf/2.
The angle formed by the optical axis and the surface normal of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the side where the diffraction grating section 114 is formed at the incidence position of the axial marginal ray can be represented by Ed/(2Rd). More specifically, the upper and lower limits of the formula (9) correspond to the incident angle of the axial marginal ray incident on the diffraction grating section 114.
When (E1−Ed)/Ld+Ed×Pf−Ed/Rd exceeds the upper limit of the formula (9), the incident angle of the axial marginal ray incident on the diffraction grating section 114 will be too large. As a result, the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface will increase, making it difficult to reduce flare.
When (E1−Ed)/Ld+Ed×Pf−Ed/Rd falls below the lower limit of the formula (9), the refractive power of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side becomes too small, or the aberration correction effect by the DOE 110 cannot sufficiently be acquired. As a result, it becomes difficult to correct aberrations of the entire optical system.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (9) is set within the range of the following formula (9a), more desirably, set within the range of the formula (9b).
0.70<(E1−Ed)/Ld+Ed×Pf−Ed/Rd<1.8 (9a)
0.75<(E1−Ed)/Ld+Ed×Pf−Ed/Rd<1.7 (9b)
It is desirable that the following formula (11) is satisfied.
10 degrees<|θD|<57 degrees (11)
where θD is the incident angle of the axial marginal ray incident on the diffraction grating section 114 when focusing at infinity. The incident angle θD refers to the angle formed by the axial marginal ray and the surface normal of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the image side at the incidence position where the axial marginal ray is incident on the diffraction grating section 114.
When |θD| exceeds the upper limit of the formula (11), the incident angle of the axial marginal ray incident on the diffraction grating section 114 will be too large. As a result, the amount of light incident on the grating wall surface will increase, making it difficult to reduce flare.
When |θD| falls below the lower limit of the formula (11), the refractive power of the lens surface of the first lens 112 on the object side becomes too small, or the aberration correction effect by the DOE 110 cannot sufficiently be acquired. As a result, it becomes difficult to correct aberrations of the entire optical system.
It is desirable that the range of the formula (11) is set within the range of the following formula (11a), more desirably, set within the range of the formula (11b).
15 degrees<|θD|<51 degrees (11a)
20 degrees<|θD|<45 degrees (11b)
Next, an optical system according to a third exemplary embodiment will be described.
The first lens group L1 includes a DOE 210. As illustrated in
The configuration of the diffraction grating section 214 is similar to the configuration of the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. More specifically, the diffraction grating section 214 includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating in this order from the first lens 212. The optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 214 is positive.
Each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 214 is inclined relative to the optical axis in such a manner that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface gradually decreases as the grating wall surface comes closer from the first lens 212 to the second lens 213. From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 214 is inclined to satisfy the formula (1).
For each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 214 of the DOE 210, relations between the distance from the grating wall surface to the optical axis, and respective θH (degrees), θM (degrees), and θHM (degrees) are illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the DOE 210 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the first diffraction grating is formed of a resin material (Nd=1.528, υd=34.7, and θgF=0.605).
The second diffraction grating is formed of a resin material (Nd=1.557, υd=50.2, and θgF=0.568). The grating height d is 19.9 μm.
Forming the first and the second diffraction gratings by using such materials enables obtaining high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
Next, an optical system according to a fourth exemplary embodiment will be described.
The first lens group L1 includes a DOE 310, As illustrated in
The configuration of the diffraction grating section 314 is similar to the configuration of the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. More specifically, the diffraction grating section 314 includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating in this order from the first lens 312. The optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 314 is positive.
Each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 314 is inclined relative to the optical axis in such a manner that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface gradually decreases as the grating wall surface comes closer from the first lens 312 to the second lens 313. From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 314 is inclined to satisfy the formula (1).
For each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 314 of the DOE 310, relations between the distance from the grating wall surface to the optical axis, and respective θH (degrees), θM (degrees), and θHM (degrees) are illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the DOE 310 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the first diffraction grating is formed of a resin material (Nd=1.615, υd=26.5, and θgF=0.612).
The second diffraction grating is formed of a resin material (Nd=1.643, υd=38.8, and θgF=0.578). The grating height d is 21.5 μm.
Forming the first and the second diffraction gratings by using such materials enables obtaining high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
Next, an optical system according to a fifth exemplary embodiment will be described.
The first lens group L1 includes a DOE 410. As illustrated in
The configuration of the diffraction grating section 414 is similar to the configuration of the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. More specifically, the diffraction grating section 414 includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating in this order from the first lens 412. The optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 414 is positive.
Each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 414 is inclined relative to the optical axis in such a manner that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface gradually decreases as the grating wall surface comes closer from the first lens 412 to the second lens 413. From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 414 is inclined to satisfy the formula (1).
For each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 414 of the DOE 410, relations between the distance from the grating wall surface to the optical axis, and respective θH (degrees), θM (degrees), and θHM (degrees) are illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the DOE 410 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the first diffraction grating is formed of resin (Nd=1.566, υd=19.0, and θgF=0.418) made of a mixture of acrylic resin and ITO fine particles.
The second diffraction grating is formed of resin (Nd=1.619, υd=43.2, and θgF=0.564) made of a mixture of acrylic resin and ZrO2 fine particles. The grating height d is 10.79 μm.
Forming the first and the second diffraction gratings by using such materials enables obtaining high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
Next, an optical system according to a sixth exemplary embodiment will be described.
The first lens group L1 includes a DOE 510. As illustrated in
The configuration of the diffraction grating section 514 is similar to the configuration of the DOE 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. More specifically, the diffraction grating section 514 includes a first diffraction grating and a second diffraction grating having a larger refractive index than the first diffraction grating in this order from the first lens 512. The optical power by the diffraction of the diffraction grating section 514 is positive.
Each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 514 is inclined relative to the optical axis in such a manner that the inner diameter of the grating wall surface gradually decreases as the grating wall surface comes closer from the first lens 512 to the second lens 513. From another viewpoint, the grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 514 is inclined to satisfy the formula (1).
For each grating wall surface of the diffraction grating section 514 of the DOE 510, relations between the distance from the grating wall surface to the optical axis, and respective θH (degrees), θM (degrees), and θHM (degrees) are illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the DOE 510 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the first diffraction grating is formed of resin (Nd=1.480, υd=21.7, and θgF=0.383) made of a mixture of fluororesin and ITO fine particles.
The second diffraction grating is formed of a resin material (Nd=1.524, υd=51.6, and θgF=0.562). The grating height d is 12.95 μm.
Forming the first and the second diffraction gratings by using such materials enables obtaining high diffraction efficiency in a wide wavelength range.
The first to the fifth numerical examples corresponding to the optical systems 100 to 500 according to the second to the sixth exemplary embodiments, are shown below.
In the surface data according to each numerical example, r denotes the curvature radius of each optical surface, and d (mm) denotes the on-axis interval (distance on the optical axis) between the m-th and the (m+1)-th surfaces, where m is the surface number of the optical system counted from the light incident side, nd is the refractive index of the d line of each optical member, and υd is the Abbe number for the d line of the optical member.
“e±B” in aspherical surface data and diffractive surface data means “10±B”. The aspherical surface shape of the optical surface is represented by the following formula (12) where X is the amount of displacement from the surface vertex in the optical axis direction, H is the height from the optical axis in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction, R is the paraxial curvature radius, k is the conic constant, and A4, A6, A8, A10, A12, and A14 are aspheric surface coefficients.
In each numerical example, the values of d, focal length (mm), F-number, and half-field angle (degrees) are values when the optical system according to each exemplary embodiment is focused on an object at infinity. A back focus BF is the distance from the last lens surface to the image plane. The total lens length is the sum of the distance from the first lens surface to the last lens surface and the value of the back focus BF.
A phase shape ψ of the diffractive surface of the diffractive optical element according to each numerical example is represented by the following formula (13).
ψ(h,m)=(2π/mλ0)(C2h2+C4h4+C6h6 . . . ) (13)
Referring to the formula (13), h is the height from the optical axis, λ0 is the design wavelength, m is the diffraction order, and Ci (i=2, 4, 6 . . . ) is the phase coefficient.
In this case, the power φD of the diffraction grating for an arbitrary wavelengths λ and an arbitrary diffraction order m can be represented by the following formula (14), where C2 is the lowest order phase coefficient.
φD(λ,m)=−2C2mλ/λ0 (14)
According to each numerical example, for each diffraction grating constituting the diffractive optical element, the diffraction order m is 1, and the design wavelength λ0 is the wavelength of the d line (587.56 nm).
Various numerical values in the optical systems according to the second to the sixth exemplary embodiments are summarized in Table 1.
[Optical Apparatuses]
Since the imaging apparatus 600 according to the present exemplary embodiment includes the optical system 602 similar to the optical system according to any one of the second to the sixth exemplary embodiments, a high-definition image in which flare caused by a grating wall surface of a DOE is reduced. As the light receiving element 603, such an image sensor as a CCD sensor and CMOS sensor can be used.
The above-described optical system according to each exemplary embodiment is applicable not only to a digital still camera illustrated in
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-213545, filed Oct. 31, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2016-213545 | Oct 2016 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6829093 | Nakai | Dec 2004 | B1 |
20020015231 | Ogawa | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20050219702 | Nakai | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090143560 | Hatanaka | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110013284 | Ushigome | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120120494 | Takayama | May 2012 | A1 |
20120229921 | Eguchi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-321429 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2008-083096 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-170594 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2011-170028 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2013-064858 | Apr 2013 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180120582 A1 | May 2018 | US |