Patent Grant
9074242
The invention generally relates to droplet based digital PCR and methods for analyzing a target nucleic acid using the same.
Assays have been developed that rely on analyzing nucleic acid molecules from bodily fluids for the presence of mutations, thus leading to early diagnosis of certain diseases such as cancer. In a typical bodily fluid sample however, any abnormal nucleic acids containing mutations of interest are often present in small amounts (e.g., less than 1%) relative to a total amount of nucleic acid in the bodily fluid sample. This can result in a failure to detect the small amount of abnormal nucleic acid due to stochastic sampling bias.
The advent of PCR and real-time PCR methodologies has greatly improved the analysis of nucleic acids from both throughput and quantitative perspectives. While traditional PCR techniques typically rely on end-point, and sometimes semi-quantitative, analysis of amplified DNA targets via agarose gel electrophoresis, real-time PCR (or qPCR) methods are geared toward accurately quantifying exponential amplification as the reaction progresses. qPCR reactions are monitored either using a variety of highly sequence specific fluorescent probe technologies, or by using non-specific DNA intercalating fluorogenic dyes.
As the need for higher throughput in analyzing multiple targets in parallel continues to escalate in the fields of genomics and genetics, and as the need for more efficient use of sample grows in medically related fields such as diagnostics, the ability to perform and quantify multiple amplifications simultaneously within the same reaction volume (multiplexing) is paramount for both PCR and qPCR. While end-point PCR can support a high level of amplicon multiplexing, such ample capacity for multiplexing probe-based qPCR reactions remains elusive for a number of reasons. For example, most commercial real-time thermal cyclers only support up to four differently colored fluorophores for detection as a consequence of the limited spectral resolution of common fluorophores, translating into a multiplexing capacity of 4×. Additionally, while optimization of single target primer/probe reactions is now standard practice, combining primers and probes for multiple reactions changes the thermodynamic efficiencies and/or chemical kinetics, necessitating potentially extensive troubleshooting and optimization. Very high multiplexing of greater than 100× has been demonstrated in a “one of many” detection format for pathogen identification using “sloppy” molecular beacons and melting points as fingerprints, however the approach is restricted to applications with a slim likelihood of the presence of multiple simultaneous targets. A half-multiplexing method achieved 19× in a two step reaction with general multiplexed preamplification in the first step, followed by separate single-plex quantitative PCR in the second step. However a general purpose single-pot solution to qPCR multiplexing does not yet exist.
Digital PCR (dPCR) is an alternative quantitation method in which dilute samples are divided into many separate reactions. See for example, Brown et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,143,496 and 6,391,559) and Vogelstein et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,440,706, 6,753,147, and 7,824,889), the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The distribution from background of target DNA molecules among the reactions follows Poisson statistics, and at so called “terminal dilution” the vast majority of reactions contain either one or zero target DNA molecules for practical intents and purposes. In another case, at so called “limiting dilution” some reactions contain zero DNA molecules, some reactions contain one molecule, and frequently some other reactions contain multiple molecules, following the Poisson distribution. It is understood that terminal dilution and limiting dilution are useful concepts for describing DNA loading in reaction vessels, but they have no formal mathematical definition, nor are they necessarily mutually exclusive. Ideally, at terminal dilution, the number of PCR positive reactions (PCR(+)) equals the number of template molecules originally present. At limiting dilution, Poisson statistics are used to uncover the underlying amount of DNA. The principle advantage of digital compared to qPCR is that it avoids any need to interpret the time dependence of fluorescence intensity—an analog signal—along with the main underlying uncertainty of non-exponential amplification during early cycles.
The invention generally relates to the manipulation of nucleic acid in droplets, and in particular, nucleic acid amplification and detection. In one aspect, the invention provides a droplet that contains a single nucleic acid template and a plurality of primer pairs specific for multiple target sites on the template. The single nucleic acid template can be DNA (e.g., genomic DNA, cDNA, etc.) or RNA. The template is amplified in the droplet for detection; and may preferably be amplified using a plurality of primer pairs as described herein.
The ability to amplify and detect single nucleic acids in droplets enables digital PCR, detection, counting, and differentiation among nucleic acids, especially those present in heterogeneous samples. Thus, the invention applies to digital amplification techniques and, in specific embodiments enables multiplex PCR in droplets. For example, multiplexing primers in droplets enables the simultaneous increase in the number of PCR droplets while keeping the amount of input DNA the same or lower and generate the same or greater amplicon yield. This results in an overall increase in the amount of PCR positive droplets and amplicon yield without the consumption of more DNA. Even though the number of PCR primer pairs per droplet is greater than one, there is only one template molecule per droplet, and thus, in some implementations, there is only one primer pair per droplet that is being utilized at one time. As such, the advantages of droplet PCR for eliminating bias from either allele specific PCR or competition between different amplicons is maintained. However, as described below in relation to detection of haplotypes, other implementations advantageously allow detection of multiple loci on a single template using multiple primer pairs, preferably designed to minimize bias.
Microfluidic droplets for multiplex analysis according to the invention contain a plurality of probes that hybridize to amplicons produced in the droplets. Preferably, the droplet contains two or more probes, e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 60, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 500, or more probes. Certain members of the plurality of probes include a detectable label. Members of the plurality of probes can each include the same detectable label, or a different detectable label. The detectable label is preferably a fluorescent label. The plurality of probes can include one or more groups of probes at varying concentrations. The one or more groups of probes can include the same detectable label which will vary in intensity upon detection, due to the varying probe concentrations. The droplets of the invention can further contain one or more reagents for conducting a polymerase chain reaction, such as a DNA or RNA polymerase, and/or dNTPs.
The present invention additionally relates to a method for detecting a plurality of targets in a biological sample using digital PCR in microfluidic droplets. The sample may be a human tissue or body fluid. Exemplary body fluids pus, sputum, semen, urine, blood, saliva, and cerebrospinal fluid.
One or more droplets are formed, each containing a single nucleic acid template and a heterogeneous mixture of primer pairs and probes, each specific for multiple target sites on the template. For example, a first fluid (either continuous, or discontinuous as in droplets) containing a single nucleic acid template (DNA or RNA) is merged with a second fluid (also either continuous, or discontinuous as in droplets) containing a plurality of primer pairs and a plurality of probes, each specific for multiple targets sites on the nucleic acid template to form a droplet containing the single nucleic acid template and a heterogeneous mixture of primer pairs and probes. The second fluid can also contain reagents for conducting a PCR reaction, such as a polymerase and dNTPs.
Certain members of the plurality of probes include a detectable label. Members of the plurality of probes can each include the same detectable label, or a different detectable label. The detectable label is preferably a fluorescent label. The plurality of probes can include one or more groups of probes at varying concentrations. The one or more groups of probes can include the same detectable label which varies in intensity upon detection, due to the varying probe concentrations.
The first and second fluids can each be in droplet form. Any technique known in the art for forming droplets may be used with methods of the invention. An exemplary method involves flowing a stream of the sample fluid containing the nucleic acid template such that it intersects two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid. The carrier fluid is immiscible with the sample fluid. Intersection of the sample fluid with the two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid results in partitioning of the sample fluid into individual sample droplets containing the first fluid. The carrier fluid may be any fluid that is immiscible with the sample fluid. An exemplary carrier fluid is oil. In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid includes a surfactant, such as a fluorosurfactant. The same method may be applied to create individual droplets from the second fluid containing the primer pairs (and, in some implementations, the amplification reagents). Either the droplets containing the first fluid, the droplets containing the second fluid, or both, may be formed and then stored in a library for later merging, aspects of certain implementations of which are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/504,764, hereby incorporated herein in its entirety for all purposes. Once formed, droplets containing the first and second fluids can be merged to form single droplets containing the single nucleic acid template and heterogeneous mixture of primer pairs and probes. Merging can be accomplished, for example, in the presence of an electric field. Moreover, it is not required that both fluids be in the form of droplets when merging takes places. One exemplary method for merging of fluid portions with droplets is taught, for example, in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/441,985, filed on even date herewith.
The nucleic acid template in each of the merged/formed droplets is amplified, e.g., by thermocycling the droplets under temperatures/conditions sufficient to conduct a PCR reaction. The resulting amplicons in the droplets can then be analyzed. For example, the presence of absence of the plurality of targets in the one or more droplets is detected optically, e.g., by the detectable label on the plurality of probes.
The invention further relates to methods for analyzing a target nucleic acid. More particularly, methods of the invention are able to detect polymerase errors that occur during a PCR reaction and are able to exclude from analysis amplification products that are a result of a polymerase error. Methods of the invention are particularly useful in digital PCR where a polymerase error may result in a partitioned section of sample being incorrectly identified as containing a mutant allele, i.e., a false positive. Such false positives greatly impact the validity and precision of digital PCR results. Methods of the invention are able to uniquely detect multiple targets with the same optical color. Methods of the invention are particularly useful in digital PCR where it is desirable to identify multiple different target molecules that may be present in the starting test fluid.
Methods of the invention involve forming sample droplets containing target nucleic acid. Ideally, methods of the invention comprise forming droplets for digital PCR. Preferred digital PCR droplets contain one copy of a nucleic acid to be amplified, although they may contain multiple copies of the same nucleic acid sequence. Any technique known in the art for forming sample droplets may be used with methods of the invention. One exemplary method involves flowing a stream of sample fluid including nucleic acids such that it intersects two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid. The carrier fluid is immiscible with the sample fluid. Intersection of the sample fluid with the two opposing streams of flowing carrier fluid results in partitioning of the sample fluid into individual sample droplets. The carrier fluid may be any fluid that is immiscible with the sample fluid. An exemplary carrier fluid is oil. In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid includes a surfactant, such as a fluorosurfactant.
The targets are then amplified in the droplets. Any method known in the art may be used to amplify the target nucleic acids either linearly or exponentially. A preferred method is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For purposes of the invention, any amplification technique commonly known in the art may be implemented such as rolling circle amplification, isothermal amplification, or any combination of amplification methods using loci specific primers, nested-primers, or random primers (such primers, and/or primers used for PCR, are included in the term “amplification reagents”). Once amplified, droplets containing amplicon from the target and amplicon from a variant of the target are excluded. One method to exclude droplets that contain a heterogeneous population of amplicons from droplets that contain a homogeneous population of amplicons includes hybridizing detectably-labeled probes to the amplicons, flowing the droplets through a microfluidic channel, and excluding those droplets in which both amplicon from the target and amplicon from a variant of the target are detected.
Once droplets containing a heterogeneous population of amplicons are excluded, droplets that contain a homogeneous population of amplicons are analyzed. Any analytical technique known in the art may be used. In certain embodiments, analyzing the droplets involves determining a number of droplets that contain only wild-type target, and determining a number of droplets that contain only a variant of the target. Generally, the presence of droplets containing only the variant is indicative of a disease, such as cancer. The variant may be an allelic variant. An exemplary allelic variant is a single nucleotide polymorphism. The variant may also be a specific haplotype. Haplotypes refer to the presence of two or more variants on the same nucleic acid strand. Haplotypes can be more informative or predictive than genotypes when used to determine such things as the presence or severity of disease, response to drug therapy or drug resistance of bacterial or viral infections. Because each droplet contains only one template strand it is an ideal vessel for the determination of haplotypes. The detection of two or more variants in a single droplet that contains a single intact nucleic acid strand identifies the haplotype of the variants on that strand. The presence of two or more markers in the same droplet can be identified by such methods as the presence of dyes of multiple colors or the increase in the intensity of a single dye or a combination of both. Any method that allows the identification of multiple variants in a single droplet enables the determination of a samples haplotype.
In accordance with some implementations of the invention, a method is provided for analyzing a target nucleic acid that includes compartmentalizing a first fluid into portions, each portion containing a single target nucleic acid; amplifying the target in the portions; excluding portions containing amplicon from the target and amplicon from a variant of the target; and analyzing target amplicons.
In other aspects, the invention generally provides methods for detecting a recurrence of a cancer in a patient. Those methods may involve forming sample droplets containing a single target nucleic acid derived from a patient sample, flowing the sample droplets through a channel, amplifying the target in the droplets, detecting amplified target in the droplets, excluding droplets including a heterogeneous population of amplicons, and analyzing non-excluded droplets to determine the presence of mutant alleles indicative of recurrence. In certain embodiments, the analyzing step includes capturing amplicon obtained from the droplets using labeled capture probes. The sample may be a human tissue or body fluid. Exemplary body fluids are pus, sputum, semen, urine, blood, saliva, stool, and cerebrospinal fluid. In other aspects of the invention generally provide a method for forensic identification of low levels of target nucleic acid in an environment having multiple other sources of nucleic acid. Such methods may also be practiced using fluids compartmentalized in containers other than or in addition to droplets.
The invention provides materials and methods for analysis of biomolecules. In one aspect, the invention provides for digital analysis in droplets, such as microfluidic droplets. The invention allows digital PCR to be conducted and provides for significantly reduced or eliminated errors.
Ideally, the sensitivity of digital PCR is limited only by the number of independent amplifications that can be analyzed, which has motivated the development of several ultra-high throughput miniaturized methods allowing millions of single molecule PCR reactions to be performed in parallel (discussed in detail elsewhere). In a preferred embodiment of the invention, digital PCR is performed in aqueous droplets separated by oil using a microfluidics system. In another preferred embodiment, the oil is a fluorinated oil such as the Fluorinert oils (3M). In a still more preferred embodiment the fluorinated oil contains a surfactant, such as PFPE-PEG-PFPE triblock copolymer, to stabilize the droplets against coalescence during the amplification step or at any point where they contact each other. Microfluidic approaches allow the rapid generation of large numbers (e.g. 106 or greater) of very uniformly sized droplets that function as picoliter volume reaction vessels (see reviews of droplet-based microfluidics). But as will be described, the invention is not limited to dPCR performed in water-in-oil emulsions, but rather is general to all methods of reaction compartmentalization for dPCR. In the description that follows, the invention is described in terms of the use of droplets for compartmentalization, but it is understood that this choice of description is not limiting for the invention, and that all of the methods of the invention are compatible with all other methods of reaction compartmentalization for dPCR.
Methods of the invention involve novel strategies for performing multiple different amplification reactions on the same sample simultaneously to quantify the abundance of multiple different DNA targets, commonly known to those familiar with the art as “multiplexing”. Methods of the invention for multiplexing dPCR assays promise greater plexity—the number of simultaneous reactions—than possible with existing qPCR or dPCR techniques. It is based on the singular nature of amplifications at terminal or limiting dilution that arises because most often only a single target allele is ever present in any one droplet even when multiple primers/probes targeting different alleles are present. This alleviates the complications that otherwise plague simultaneous competing reactions, such as varying arrival time into the exponential stage and unintended interactions between primers.
In one aspect, the invention provides materials and methods for improving amplicon yield while maintaining the sensitivity and specificity in droplet based digital PCR. More specifically, the invention provides droplets containing a single nucleic acid template and multiplexed PCR primers and methods for detecting a plurality of targets in a biological sample by forming such droplets and amplifying the nucleic acid templates using droplet based digital PCR.
Reactions within microfluidic droplets yield very uniform fluorescence intensity at the end point, and ultimately the intensity depends on the efficiency of probe hydrolysis. Thus, in another aspect of the methods of the invention, different reactions with different efficiencies can be discriminated on the basis of end point fluorescence intensity alone even if they have the same color. Furthermore, in another method of the invention, the efficiencies can be tuned simply by adjusting the probe concentration, resulting in an easy-to-use and general purpose method for multiplexing. In one demonstration of the invention, a 5-plex TaqMan® dPCR assay worked “right out of the box”, in contrast to lengthy optimizations that typify qPCR multiplexing to this degree. In another aspect of the invention, adding multiple colors increases the number of possible reactions geometrically, rather than linearly as with qPCR, because individual reactions can be labeled with multiple fluorophores. As an example, two fluorophores (VIC and FAM) were used to distinguish five different reactions in one implementation of the invention.
Methods of the invention are able to detect polymerase errors that occur during an amplification reaction and are able to exclude from analysis those products that are a result of polymerase errors. In essence, methods of the invention increase the sensitivity of digital PCR by identifying amplification products that are false positives, and excluding those products from analysis.
Methods of the invention involve forming sample droplets containing a single target nucleic acid, amplifying the target in the droplets, excluding droplets containing amplicon from the target and amplicon from a variant of the target, and analyzing target amplicons.
Nucleic Acid Target Molecules
Nucleic acid molecules include deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and/or ribonucleic acid (RNA). Nucleic acid molecules can be synthetic or derived from naturally occurring sources. In one embodiment, nucleic acid molecules are isolated from a biological sample containing a variety of other components, such as proteins, lipids and non-template nucleic acids. Nucleic acid template molecules can be obtained from any cellular material, obtained from an animal, plant, bacterium, fungus, or any other cellular organism. In certain embodiments, the nucleic acid molecules are obtained from a single cell. Biological samples for use in the present invention include viral particles or preparations. Nucleic acid molecules can be obtained directly from an organism or from a biological sample obtained from an organism, e.g., from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, seminal fluid, saliva, sputum, stool and tissue. Any tissue or body fluid specimen may be used as a source for nucleic acid for use in the invention. Nucleic acid molecules can also be isolated from cultured cells, such as a primary cell culture or a cell line. The cells or tissues from which template nucleic acids are obtained can be infected with a virus or other intracellular pathogen. A sample can also be total RNA extracted from a biological specimen, a cDNA library, viral, or genomic DNA. In certain embodiments, the nucleic acid molecules are bound as to other target molecules such as proteins, enzymes, substrates, antibodies, binding agents, beads, small molecules, peptides, or any other molecule and serve as a surrogate for quantifying and/or detecting the target molecule.
Generally, nucleic acid can be extracted from a biological sample by a variety of techniques such as those described by Maniatis, et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp. 280-281 (1982). Nucleic acid molecules may be single-stranded, double-stranded, or double-stranded with single-stranded regions (for example, stem- and loop-structures).
Droplet Formation
Methods of the invention involve forming sample droplets where some droplets contain zero target nucleic acid molecules, some droplets contain one target nucleic acid molecule, and some droplets may or may not contain multiple nucleic acid molecules (corresponding to limiting or terminal dilution, respectively, as defined above). In the preferred embodiment, the distribution of molecules within droplets obeys the Poisson distribution. However, methods for non-Poisson loading of droplets are known to those familiar with the art, and include but are not limited to active sorting of droplets, such as by laser-induced fluorescence, or by passive one-to-one loading. The description that follows assumes Poisson loading of droplets, but such description is not intended to exclude non-Poisson loading, as the invention is compatible with all distributions of DNA loading that conform to limiting or terminal dilution.
The droplets are aqueous droplets that are surrounded by an immiscible carrier fluid. Methods of forming such droplets are shown for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163), Stone et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,949 and U.S. patent application number 2010/0172803), Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 and which reissued as RE41,780) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. The content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The sample fluid is typically an aqueous buffer solution, such as ultrapure water (e.g., 18 mega-ohm resistivity, obtained, for example by column chromatography), 10 mM Tris HCl and 1 mM EDTA (TE) buffer, phosphate buffer saline (PBS) or acetate buffer. Any liquid or buffer that is physiologically compatible with nucleic acid molecules can be used. The carrier fluid is one that is immiscible with the sample fluid. The carrier fluid can be a non-polar solvent, decane (e.g., tetradecane or hexadecane), fluorocarbon oil, silicone oil or another oil (for example, mineral oil).
In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid contains one or more additives, such as agents which increase, reduce, or otherwise create non-Newtonian surface tensions (surfactants) and/or stabilize droplets against spontaneous coalescence on contact. Surfactants can include Tween, Span, fluorosurfactants, and other agents that are soluble in oil relative to water. In some applications, performance is improved by adding a second surfactant, or other agent, such as a polymer or other additive, to the sample fluid. Surfactants can aid in controlling or optimizing droplet size, flow and uniformity, for example by reducing the shear force needed to extrude or inject droplets into an intersecting channel. This can affect droplet volume and periodicity, or the rate or frequency at which droplets break off into an intersecting channel. Furthermore, the surfactant can serve to stabilize aqueous emulsions in fluorinated oils from coalescing.
In certain embodiments, the droplets may be coated with a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants. Preferred surfactants that may be added to the carrier fluid include, but are not limited to, surfactants such as sorbitan-based carboxylic acid esters (e.g., the “Span” surfactants, Fluka Chemika), including sorbitan monolaurate (Span 20), sorbitan monopalmitate (Span 40), sorbitan monostearate (Span 60) and sorbitan monooleate (Span 80), and perfluorinated polyethers (e.g., DuPont Krytox 157 FSL, FSM, and/or FSH). Other non-limiting examples of non-ionic surfactants which may be used include polyoxyethylenated alkylphenols (for example, nonyl-, p-dodecyl-, and dinonylphenols), polyoxyethylenated straight chain alcohols, polyoxyethylenated polyoxypropylene glycols, polyoxyethylenated mercaptans, long chain carboxylic acid esters (for example, glyceryl and polyglycerl esters of natural fatty acids, propylene glycol, sorbitol, polyoxyethylenated sorbitol esters, polyoxyethylene glycol esters, etc.) and alkanolamines (e.g., diethanolamine-fatty acid condensates and isopropanolamine-fatty acid condensates).
In certain embodiments, the carrier fluid may be caused to flow through the outlet channel so that the surfactant in the carrier fluid coats the channel walls. In one embodiment, the fluorosurfactant can be prepared by reacting the perflourinated polyether DuPont Krytox 157 FSL, FSM, or FSH with aqueous ammonium hydroxide in a volatile fluorinated solvent. The solvent and residual water and ammonia can be removed with a rotary evaporator. The surfactant can then be dissolved (e.g., 2.5 wt %) in a fluorinated oil (e.g., Flourinert (3M)), which then serves as the carrier fluid.
One approach to merging sample fluids, using a device called a lambda injector, involves forming a droplet, and contacting the droplet with a fluid stream, in which a portion of the fluid stream integrates with the droplet to form a mixed droplet. In this approach, only one phase needs to reach a merge area in a form of a droplet. Further description of such method is shown in the U.S. patent application to Yurkovetsky, et al. (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/441,985), the content of which is incorporated y reference herein in its entirety.
According to a method for operating the lambda injector, a droplet is formed as described above. After formation of the sample droplet from the first sample fluid, the droplet is contacted with a flow of a second sample fluid stream. Contact between the droplet and the fluid stream results in a portion of the fluid stream integrating with the droplet to form a mixed droplet.
The droplets of the first sample fluid flow through a first channel separated from each other by immiscible carrier fluid and suspended in the immiscible carrier fluid. The droplets are delivered to the merge area, i.e., junction of the first channel with the second channel, by a pressure-driven flow generated by a positive displacement pump. While droplet arrives at the merge area, a bolus of a second sample fluid is protruding from an opening of the second channel into the first channel. Preferably, the channels are oriented perpendicular to each other. However, any angle that results in an intersection of the channels may be used.
The bolus of the second sample fluid stream continues to increase in size due to pumping action of a positive displacement pump connected to channel, which outputs a steady stream of the second sample fluid into the merge area. The flowing droplet containing the first sample fluid eventually contacts the bolus of the second sample fluid that is protruding into the first channel. Contact between the two sample fluids results in a portion of the second sample fluid being segmented from the second sample fluid stream and joining with the first sample fluid droplet to form a mixed droplet. In certain embodiments, each incoming droplet of first sample fluid is merged with the same amount of second sample fluid.
In certain embodiments, an electric charge is applied to the first and second sample fluids. Description of applying electric charge to sample fluids is provided in Link et al. (U.S. patent application number 2007/0003442) and European Patent Number EP2004316 to Raindance Technologies Inc, the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Electric charge may be created in the first and second sample fluids within the carrier fluid using any suitable technique, for example, by placing the first and second sample fluids within an electric field (which may be AC, DC, etc.), and/or causing a reaction to occur that causes the first and second sample fluids to have an electric charge, for example, a chemical reaction, an ionic reaction, a photocatalyzed reaction, etc.
The electric field, in some embodiments, is generated from an electric field generator, i.e., a device or system able to create an electric field that can be applied to the fluid. The electric field generator may produce an AC field (i.e., one that varies periodically with respect to time, for example, sinusoidally, sawtooth, square, etc.), a DC field (i.e., one that is constant with respect to time), a pulsed field, etc. The electric field generator may be constructed and arranged to create an electric field within a fluid contained within a channel or a microfluidic channel. The electric field generator may be integral to or separate from the fluidic system containing the channel or microfluidic channel, according to some embodiments.
Techniques for producing a suitable electric field (which may be AC, DC, etc.) are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, in one embodiment, an electric field is produced by applying voltage across a pair of electrodes, which may be positioned on or embedded within the fluidic system (for example, within a substrate defining the channel or microfluidic channel), and/or positioned proximate the fluid such that at least a portion of the electric field interacts with the fluid. The electrodes can be fashioned from any suitable electrode material or materials known to those of ordinary skill in the art, including, but not limited to, silver, gold, copper, carbon, platinum, copper, tungsten, tin, cadmium, nickel, indium tin oxide (“ITO”), etc., as well as combinations thereof. In some cases, transparent or substantially transparent electrodes can be used.
The electric field facilitates rupture of the interface separating the second sample fluid and the droplet. Rupturing the interface facilitates merging of bolus of the second sample fluid and the first sample fluid droplet. The forming mixed droplet continues to increase in size until it a portion of the second sample fluid breaks free or segments from the second sample fluid stream prior to arrival and merging of the next droplet containing the first sample fluid. The segmenting of the portion of the second sample fluid from the second sample fluid stream occurs as soon as the shear force exerted on the forming mixed droplet by the immiscible carrier fluid overcomes the surface tension whose action is to keep the segmenting portion of the second sample fluid connected with the second sample fluid stream. The now fully formed mixed droplet continues to flow through the first channel.
In other embodiments, the rupture of the interface can be spontaneous, or the rupture can be facilitated by surface chemistry. The invention is not limited in regard to the method of rupture at the interface, as rupture can be brought about by any means.
In the context of PCR, in a preferred embodiment, the first sample fluid contains nucleic acid templates. Droplets of the first sample fluid are formed as described above. Those droplets will include the nucleic acid templates. In certain embodiments, the droplets will include only a single nucleic acid template, and thus digital PCR can be conducted. The second sample fluid contains reagents for the PCR reaction. Such reagents generally include Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, magnesium chloride, and forward and reverse primers, all suspended within an aqueous buffer. The second fluid also includes detectably labeled probes for detection of the amplified target nucleic acid, the details of which are discussed below. A droplet containing the nucleic acid is then caused to merge with the PCR reagents in the second fluid as described above, producing a droplet that includes Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, magnesium chloride, forward and reverse primers, detectably labeled probes, and the target nucleic acid. In another embodiment, the first fluid can contain the template DNA and PCR master mix (defined below), and the second fluid can contain the forward and reverse primers and the probe. The invention is not restricted in any way regarding the constituency of the first and second fluidics for PCR or digital PCR. For example, in some embodiments, the template DNA is contained in the second fluid inside droplets.
Target Amplification
Methods of the invention further involve amplifying the target nucleic acid in each droplet. Amplification refers to production of additional copies of a nucleic acid sequence and is generally carried out using polymerase chain reaction or other technologies well known in the art (e.g., Dieffenbach and Dveksler, PCR Primer, a Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, N.Y. [1995]). The amplification reaction may be any amplification reaction known in the art that amplifies nucleic acid molecules, such as polymerase chain reaction, nested polymerase chain reaction, ligase chain reaction (Barany F. (1991) PNAS 88:189-193; Barany F. (1991) PCR Methods and Applications 1:5-16), ligase detection reaction (Barany F. (1991) PNAS 88:189-193), strand displacement amplification, transcription based amplification system, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, rolling circle amplification, and hyper-branched rolling circle amplification.
In certain embodiments, the amplification reaction is the polymerase chain reaction. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) refers to methods by K. B. Mullis (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195 and 4,683,202, hereby incorporated by reference) for increasing concentration of a segment of a target sequence in a mixture of genomic DNA without cloning or purification. The process for amplifying the target sequence includes introducing an excess of oligonucleotide primers to a DNA mixture containing a desired target sequence, followed by a precise sequence of thermal cycling in the presence of a DNA polymerase. The primers are complementary to their respective strands of the double stranded target sequence.
To effect amplification, primers are annealed to their complementary sequence within the target molecule. Following annealing, the primers are extended with a polymerase so as to form a new pair of complementary strands. The steps of denaturation, primer annealing and polymerase extension can be repeated many times (i.e., denaturation, annealing and extension constitute one cycle; there can be numerous cycles) to obtain a high concentration of an amplified segment of a desired target sequence. The length of the amplified segment of the desired target sequence is determined by relative positions of the primers with respect to each other and by cycling parameters, and therefore, this length is a controllable parameter.
Methods for performing PCR in droplets are shown for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163), Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 and which reissued as RE41,780) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. The content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The sample droplet may be pre-mixed with a primer or primers, or the primer or primers may be added to the droplet. In some embodiments, droplets created by segmenting the starting sample are merged with a second set of droplets including one or more primers for the target nucleic acid in order to produce final droplets. The merging of droplets can be accomplished using, for example, one or more droplet merging techniques described for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.
In embodiments involving merging of droplets, two droplet formation modules are used. In one embodiment, a first droplet formation module produces the sample droplets consistent with limiting or terminal dilution of target nucleic acid. A second droplet formation or reinjection module inserts droplets that contain reagents for a PCR reaction. Such droplets generally include the “PCR master mix” (known to those in the art as a mixture containing at least Taq polymerase, deoxynucleotides of type A, C, G and T, and magnesium chloride) and forward and reverse primers (known to those in the art collectively as “primers”), all suspended within an aqueous buffer. The second droplet also includes detectably labeled probes for detection of the amplified target nucleic acid, the details of which are discussed below. Different arrangements of reagents between the two droplet types is envisioned. For example, in another embodiment, the template droplets also contain the PCR master mix, but the primers and probes remain in the second droplets. Any arrangement of reagents and template DNA can be used according to the invention.
Primers can be prepared by a variety of methods including but not limited to cloning of appropriate sequences and direct chemical synthesis using methods well known in the art (Narang et al., Methods Enzymol., 68:90 (1979); Brown et al., Methods Enzymol., 68:109 (1979)). Primers can also be obtained from commercial sources such as Operon Technologies, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Sigma, and Life Technologies. The primers can have an identical melting temperature. The lengths of the primers can be extended or shortened at the 5′ end or the 3′ end to produce primers with desired melting temperatures. Also, the annealing position of each primer pair can be designed such that the sequence and, length of the primer pairs yield the desired melting temperature. The simplest equation for determining the melting temperature of primers smaller than 25 base pairs is the Wallace Rule (Td=2(A+T)+4(G+C)). Another method for determining the melting temperature of primers is the nearest neighbor method Computer programs can also be used to design primers, including but not limited to Array Designer Software (Arrayit Inc.), Oligonucleotide Probe Sequence Design Software for Genetic Analysis (Olympus Optical Co.), NetPrimer, and DNAsis from Hitachi Software Engineering. The TM (melting or annealing temperature) of each primer is calculated using software programs such as Oligo Design, available from Invitrogen Corp.
In one embodiment, the droplet formation modules are arranged and controlled to produce an interdigitation of sample droplets and PCR reagent droplets flowing through a channel. Such an arrangement is described for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.
A sample droplet is then caused to merge with a PCR reagent droplet, producing a droplet that includes the PCR master mix, primers, detectably labeled probes, and the target nucleic acid. Droplets may be merged for example by: producing dielectrophoretic forces on the droplets using electric field gradients and then controlling the forces to cause the droplets to merge; producing droplets of different sizes that thus travel at different velocities, which causes the droplets to merge; and producing droplets having different viscosities that thus travel at different velocities, which causes the droplets to merge with each other. Each of those techniques is further described in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc. Further description of producing and controlling dielectrophoretic forces on droplets to cause the droplets to merge is described in Link et al. (U.S. patent application number 2007/0003442) and European Patent Number EP2004316 to Raindance Technologies Inc.
In another embodiment, called simple droplet generation, a single droplet formation module, or a plurality of droplet formation modules are arranged to produce droplets from a mixture already containing the template DNA, the PCR master mix, primers, and detectably labeled probes. In yet another embodiment, called co-flow, upstream from a single droplet formation module two channels intersect allowing two flow streams to converge. One flow stream contains one set of reagents and the template DNA, and the other contains the remaining reagents. In the preferred embodiment for co-flow, the template DNA and the PCR master mix are in one flow stream, and the primers and probes are in the other. However, the invention is not limited in regard to the constituency of either flow stream. For example, in another embodiment, one flow stream contains just the template DNA, and the other contains the PCR master mix, the primers, and the probes. On convergence of the flow streams in a fluidic intersection, the flow streams may or may not mix before the droplet generation nozzle. In either embodiment, some amount of fluid from the first stream, and some amount of fluid from the second stream are encapsulated within a single droplet. Following encapsulation, complete mixing occurs.
Once final droplets have been produced by any of the droplet forming embodiments above, or by any other embodiments, the droplets are thermal cycled, resulting in amplification of the target nucleic acid in each droplet. In certain embodiments, the droplets are collected off-chip as an emulsion in a PCR thermal cycling tube and then thermally cycled in a conventional thermal cycler. Temperature profiles for thermal cycling can be adjusted and optimized as with any conventional DNA amplification by PCR.
In certain embodiments, the droplets are flowed through a channel in a serpentine path between heating and cooling lines to amplify the nucleic acid in the droplet. The width and depth of the channel may be adjusted to set the residence time at each temperature, which can be controlled to anywhere between less than a second and minutes.
In certain embodiments, the three temperature zones are used for the amplification reaction. The three temperature zones are controlled to result in denaturation of double stranded nucleic acid (high temperature zone), annealing of primers (low temperature zones), and amplification of single stranded nucleic acid to produce double stranded nucleic acids (intermediate temperature zones). The temperatures within these zones fall within ranges well known in the art for conducting PCR reactions. See for example, Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 2001).
In certain embodiments, the three temperature zones are controlled to have temperatures as follows: 95° C. (TH), 55° C. (TL), 72° C. (TM). The prepared sample droplets flow through the channel at a controlled rate. The sample droplets first pass the initial denaturation zone (TH) before thermal cycling. The initial preheat is an extended zone to ensure that nucleic acids within the sample droplet have denatured successfully before thermal cycling. The requirement for a preheat zone and the length of denaturation time required is dependent on the chemistry being used in the reaction. The samples pass into the high temperature zone, of approximately 95° C., where the sample is first separated into single stranded DNA in a process called denaturation. The sample then flows to the low temperature, of approximately 55° C., where the hybridization process takes place, during which the primers anneal to the complementary sequences of the sample. Finally, as the sample flows through the third medium temperature, of approximately 72° C., the polymerase process occurs when the primers are extended along the single strand of DNA with a thermostable enzyme. Methods for controlling the temperature in each zone may include but are not limited to electrical resistance, peltier junction, microwave radiation, and illumination with infrared radiation.
The nucleic acids undergo the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as the droplets passes through each thermal cycle as they flow through the channel. The total number of cycles in the device is easily altered by an extension of thermal zones or by the creation of a continuous loop structure. The sample undergoes the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as it passes through N amplification cycles of the complete thermal device.
In other embodiments, the temperature zones are controlled to achieve two individual temperature zones for a PCR reaction. In certain embodiments, the two temperature zones are controlled to have temperatures as follows: 95° C. (TH) and 60° C. (TL). The sample droplet optionally flows through an initial preheat zone before entering thermal cycling. The preheat zone may be important for some chemistry for activation and also to ensure that double stranded nucleic acid in the droplets are fully denatured before the thermal cycling reaction begins. In an exemplary embodiment, the preheat dwell length results in approximately 10 minutes preheat of the droplets at the higher temperature.
The sample droplet continues into the high temperature zone, of approximately 95° C., where the sample is first separated into single stranded DNA in a process called denaturation. The sample then flows through the device to the low temperature zone, of approximately 60° C., where the hybridization process takes place, during which the primers anneal to the complementary sequences of the sample. Finally the polymerase process occurs when the primers are extended along the single strand of DNA with a thermostable enzyme. The sample undergoes the same thermal cycling and chemical reaction as it passes through each thermal cycle of the complete device. The total number of cycles in the device is easily altered by an extension of block length and tubing.
In another embodiment the droplets are created and/or merged on chip followed by their storage either on the same chip or another chip or off chip in some type of storage vessel such as a PCR tube. The chip or storage vessel containing the droplets is then cycled in its entirety to achieve the desired PCR heating and cooling cycles.
In another embodiment the droplets are collected in a chamber where the density difference between the droplets and the surrounding oil allows for the oil to be rapidly exchanged without removing the droplets. The temperature of the droplets can then be rapidly changed by exchange of the oil in the vessel for oil of a different temperature. This technique is broadly useful with two and three step temperature cycling or any other sequence of temperatures.
The invention is not limited by the method used to thermocycle the droplets. Any method of thermocycling the droplets may be used.
Target Detection
After amplification, droplets are flowed to a detection module for detection of amplification products. For embodiments in which the droplets are thermally cycled off-chip, the droplets require re-injection into either a second fluidic circuit for read-out—that may or may not reside on the same chip as the fluidic circuit or circuits for droplet generation—or in certain embodiments the droplets may be reinjected for read-out back into the original fluidic circuit used for droplet generation. The droplets may be individually analyzed and detected using any methods known in the art, such as detecting the presence or amount of a reporter. Generally, the detection module is in communication with one or more detection apparatuses. The detection apparatuses can be optical or electrical detectors or combinations thereof. Examples of suitable detection apparatuses include optical waveguides, microscopes, diodes, light stimulating devices, (e.g., lasers), photo multiplier tubes, and processors (e.g., computers and software), and combinations thereof, which cooperate to detect a signal representative of a characteristic, marker, or reporter, and to determine and direct the measurement or the sorting action at a sorting module. Further description of detection modules and methods of detecting amplification products in droplets are shown in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.
In certain embodiments, amplified target are detected using detectably labeled probes. In particular embodiments, the detectably labeled probes are optically labeled probes, such as fluorescently labeled probes. Examples of fluorescent labels include, but are not limited to, Atto dyes, 4-acetamido-4′-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′disulfonic acid; acridine and derivatives: acridine, acridine isothiocyanate; 5-(2′-aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (EDANS); 4-amino-N-[3-vinylsulfonyl)phenyl]naphthalimide-3,5 disulfonate; N-(4-anilino-1-naphthyl)maleimide; anthranilamide; BODIPY; Brilliant Yellow; coumarin and derivatives; coumarin, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC, Coumarin 120), 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcouluarin (Coumaran 151); cyanine dyes; cyanosine; 4′,6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); 5′5″-dibromopyrogallol-sulfonaphthalein (Bromopyrogallol Red); 7-diethylamino-3-(4′-isothiocyanatophenyl)-4-methylcoumarin; diethylenetriamine pentaacetate; 4,4′-diisothiocyanatodihydro-stilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid; 4,4′-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid; 5-[dimethylamino]naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride (DNS, dansylchloride); 4-dimethylaminophenylazophenyl-4′-isothiocyanate (DABITC); eosin and derivatives; eosin, eosin isothiocyanate, erythrosin and derivatives; erythrosin B, erythrosin, isothiocyanate; ethidium; fluorescein and derivatives; 5-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 5-(4,6-dichlorotriazin-2-yl)aminofluorescein (DTAF), 2′,7′-dimethoxy-4′5′-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein, fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate, QFITC, (XRITC); fluorescamine; IR144; IR1446; Malachite Green isothiocyanate; 4-methylumbelliferoneortho cresolphthalein; nitrotyrosine; pararosaniline; Phenol Red; B-phycoerythrin; o-phthaldialdehyde; pyrene and derivatives: pyrene, pyrene butyrate, succinimidyl 1-pyrene; butyrate quantum dots; Reactive Red 4 (Cibacron™ Brilliant Red 3B-A) rhodamine and derivatives: 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 6-carboxyrhodamine (R6G), lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl chloride rhodamine (Rhod), rhodamine B, rhodamine 123, rhodamine X isothiocyanate, sulforhodamine B, sulforhodamine 101, sulfonyl chloride derivative of sulforhodamine 101 (Texas Red); N,N,N′,N′ tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA); tetramethyl rhodamine; tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC); riboflavin; rosolic acid; terbium chelate derivatives; Cy3; Cy5; Cy5.5; Cy7; IRD 700; IRD 800; La Jolta Blue; phthalo cyanine; and naphthalo cyanine. Preferred fluorescent labels are FAM and VIC™ (from Applied Biosystems). Labels other than fluorescent labels are contemplated by the invention, including other optically-detectable labels.
In certain aspects, the droplets of the invention contain a plurality of detectable probes that hybridize to amplicons produced in the droplets. Members of the plurality of probes can each include the same detectable label, or a different detectable label. The plurality of probes can also include one or more groups of probes at varying concentration. The groups of probes at varying concentrations can include the same detectable label which vary in intensity, due to varying probe concentrations.
In a separate embodiment the detection can occur by the scanning of droplets confined to a monolayer in a storage device that is transparent to the wavelengths or method or detection. Droplets stored in this fashion can be scanned either by the movement of the storage device by the scanner or the movement of the scanner over the storage device.
The invention is not limited to the TaqMan assay, as described above, but rather the invention encompasses the use of all fluorogenic DNA hybridization probes, such as molecular beacons, Solaris probes, scorpion probes, and any other probes that function by sequence specific recognition of target DNA by hybridization and result in increased fluorescence on amplification of the target sequence.
Digital PCR Performance in Droplets
Digital PCR performance in the emulsion format was validated by measuring a serial dilution of a reference gene, branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase E1 (BCKDHA). Mixtures of the PCR master mix, 1× primers and probe for BCKDHA, and varying concentrations of a mixture of human genomic DNA (1:1 NA14091 and NA13705) were compartmentalized into over one million 5.3 pL droplets in a water-in-fluorinated oil emulsion using the droplet generation microfluidic chip. The emulsion was thermally cycled off-chip and afterwards the fluorescence of each droplet was analyzed by fluorescence in the readout chip (see
An exemplary microfluidic system for droplet generation and readout is depicted in
In a serial dilution the average number of target DNA molecules per droplet—called the “occupancy” from this point forward—should decrease in direct proportion to the DNA concentration. The occupancy was calculated from Poisson statistics using the following equation well known to those experienced in the art:
where P and N are the numbers of PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets respectively.
Droplets were analyzed by fluorescence while flowing through the readout chip to count the numbers of PCR(+) and PCR(−) droplets (see
where n is the number of dilutions, A is the occupancy at the starting concentration (n=0), and f is the dilution factor. The linear fit was in excellent agreement with the data, with an R2 value of 0.9999 and the fitted dilution factor of 4.8 in close agreement with the expected value of 5.0.
Multiplexing Primers in a Digital PCR Reaction
Droplet based digital PCR technology, as described in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163), Anderson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,041,481 and which reissued as RE41,780) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc, (the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties) utilizes a single primer pair per library droplet. This library droplet is merged with a template droplet which contains all the PCR reagents including genomic DNA except for the primers. After merging of the template and the primer library droplets the new droplet now contains all the reagents necessary to perform PCR. The droplet is then thermal cycled to produce amplicons. In one embodiment, the template DNA is diluted in the template mix such that on average there is less than one haploid genome per droplet.
Having only one haploid genome (i.e., one allele) per droplet gives droplet PCR advantages over standard singleplex or multiplex PCR in tubes or microwells. For example, in traditional PCR, both alleles are present in the reaction mix so if there is a difference in the PCR efficiency between alleles, the allele with the highest efficiency will be over represented. Additionally, there can be variances in the sequence to which the PCR primers hybridize, despite careful primer design. A variance in the primer hybridization sequence can cause that primer to have a lower efficiency for hybridization for the allele that has the variance compared to the allele that has the wild type sequence. This can also cause one allele to be amplified preferentially over the other allele if both alleles are present in the same reaction mix.
These issues are avoided in droplet based PCR because there is only one template molecule per droplet, and thus one allele per droplet. Thus, even if primer variance exists that reduces the PCR efficiency for one allele, there is no competition between alleles because the alleles are separated and thus uniformly amplified.
Optimization of traditional multiplexing of standard PCR primers in tubes or wells is known to be difficult. Multiple PCR amplicons being generated in the same reaction can lead to competition between amplicons that have differing efficiencies due to differences in sequence or length. This results in varying yields between competing amplicons which can result in non uniform amplicon yields. However, because droplet based digital PCR utilizes only one template molecule per droplet, even if there are multiple PCR primer pairs present in the droplet, only one primer pair will be active. Since only one amplicon is being generated per droplet, there is no competition between amplicons, resulting in a more uniform amplicon yield between different amplicons.
A certain amount of DNA is required to generate either a specific quantity of DNA and/or a specific number of PCR positive droplets to achieve sufficient sequencing coverage per base. Because only a percentage of the droplets are PCR positive, approximately 1 in 3 in the standard procedure, it takes more DNA to achieve the equivalent PCR yield per template DNA molecule. The number of PCR positive droplets and thus the amplicon yield can be increased by adding more genomic DNA. For instance, increasing the amount of genomic DNA twofold while maintaining the number of droplets constant will double the amplicon yield. However there is a limit to the amount of genomic DNA that can be added before there is a significant chance of having both alleles for a gene in the same droplet, thereby eliminating the advantage of droplet PCR for overcoming allele specific PCR and resulting in allelic dropout.
One way to allow the input of more genomic DNA is by generating more droplets to keep the haploid molecules per droplet ratio constant. For instance doubling the amount of DNA and doubling the amount of droplets increases the amplicon yield by 2× while maintaining the same haploid genome per droplet ratio. However, while doubling the number of droplets isn't problematic, increasing the amount of DNA can be challenging to users that have a limited amount of DNA.
The multiplexing of PCR primers in droplets enables the simultaneous increase in the number of PCR droplets while keeping the amount of input DNA the same or lower to generate an equal or greater amplicon yield. This results in an overall increase in the amount of PCR positive droplets and amplicon yield without the consumption of more DNA.
By way of example, if there is an average of 1 haploid genome per every 4 droplets or ¼ of the haploid genome per droplet and one PCR primer pair per droplet, the chances of the correct template being present for the PCR primer in the droplet is 1 out of 4. However, if there are 2 PCR primer pairs per droplet, then there is double the chance that there will be the correct template present in the droplet. This results in 1 out of 2 droplets being PCR positive which doubles the amplicon yield without doubling the input DNA. If the number of droplets containing the 2× multiplexed primers is doubled and the DNA kept constant, then the number of PCR positive droplets drops back to 1 in 4, but the total number of PCR droplets remains the same because the number of droplets have been doubled. If the multiplexing level in each droplet is increased to 4× and the input DNA is the same, the chance of the correct template molecule being present in each droplet doubles. This results in the number of PCR positive droplets being increased to 1 in 2 which doubles the amount of amplicon yield without increasing the amount of input DNA. Thus, by increasing the multiplexing of PCR primers in each droplet and by increasing the number of droplets overall, the amplicon yield can be increased by 4-fold without increasing the amount of input DNA.
Alternatively, if the amplicon yield is already sufficient, by increasing the multiplexing level for the PCR primers in each droplet, the amount of input genomic DNA can be dropped without sacrificing amplicon yield. For example if the multiplexing level of the PCR primers goes from 1× to 2×, the amount of input genomic DNA can be decreased by 2× while still maintaining the same overall amplicon yield.
Even though the number of PCR primer pairs per droplet is greater than one, there is still only one template molecule per droplet and thus there is only one primer pair per droplet that is being utilized at one time. This means that the advantages of droplet PCR for eliminating bias from either allele specific PCR or competition between different amplicons is maintained.
An example demonstration of droplet-based amplification and detection of multiple target sequences in a single droplet is shown here. Multiple copies of 5 sets of primers (primers for TERT, RNaseP, E1a, SMN1 and SMN2) were encapsulated in a single droplet at various concentrations along with the template DNA and the PCR master mix. Probes that specifically bind to TERT, RNaseP, E1a, SMN1 or SMN2 were also encapsulated in the droplets containing the primers. Probes for TERT, RNaseP and E1a were labeled with the VIC dye and probes for SMN1 and SMN2 were labeled with the FAM dye. The sequences for TERT RNaseP, E1a, SMN1 and SMN2 were amplified by PCR. The PCR was conducted with a standard thermal cycling setting. For example:
At the end of the PCR, the fluorescence emission from each droplet was determined and plotted on a scattered plot based on its wavelength and intensity. Six clusters, each representing droplets having the corresponding fluorescence wavelength and intensity were shown. The TERT, RNaseP and E1a clusters showed the fluorescence of the VIC dye at three distinct intensities and SMN1 and SMN1 clusters showed the fluorescence of the FAM dye at two distinct intensities (
In an another demonstration of droplet-based amplification and detection of multiple target sequences in a single droplet, 5 sets of primers (primers for TERT, RNaseP, E1a, 815A and 815G) were encapsulated in a single droplet at various concentrations along with the template DNA, the PCR master mix, and the probes. The five different probes TERT, RNaseP, E1a, 815A and 815G were also encapsulated in the droplets containing the primers. Probes for TERT and 815A were labeled with the VIC dye and probes for 815G were labeled with the FAM dye. For each of RNaseP and E1a, two probes, one labeled with the VIC dye and the other labeled with the FAM dye, were encapsulated.
The droplets containing both the primers and probes were fused with droplets containing the template. PCR reactions were conducted with the fused droplets to amply the sequences for TERT, RNaseP, E1a, 815A and 815G. The PCR was conducted with a standard thermal cycling setting.
At the end of the PCR, the fluorescence emission from each fused droplet was determined and plotted on a scattered plot based on its wavelength and intensity. Six clusters, each representing droplets having the corresponding fluorescence wavelength and intensity were shown. The TERT and 815A clusters showed the fluorescence of the VIC dye at two distinct intensities; the 815G clusters showed the fluorescence of the FAM dye; and the RNaseP and E1a clusters showed the fluorescence of both the FAM and the VIC dye at distinct intensities (
In yet another exemplary demonstration of multiplexed primer pairs in a droplet-based digital PCR reaction, two droplet libraries were generated: droplet library A was generated where each droplet contained only one primer pair; and droplet library B was generated where the primer pairs were multiplexed at 5× level in each droplet. HapMap sample NA18858 was processed in duplicate with droplet libraries A or B using standard procedures. Two μg sample DNA was used for droplet library A and one μg sample DNA was used for the 5× multiplex droplet library B. After PCR amplification, both droplet libraries were broken and purified over a Qiagen MinElute column and then run on an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Samples were sequenced by Illumina on the Illumina GAII with 50 nucleotide reads and the sequencing results were analyzed using the standard sequencing metrics. The results from the 5× multiplexed droplet library B were compared to the singleplex droplet library A using standard metrics shown in the Table below.
The results obtained from the 5× multiplexed droplet library B were equivalent or better than what was obtained from droplet library A. The multiplexing of primers delivers the same sequencing results for base coverage, specificity and uniformity that the singleplexing does with the added advantage of reduced input DNA.
Monochromatic Gene Copy Number Assay
Traditional digital PCR methods involve the use of a single labeled probe specific for an individual target.
Methods of the invention involve performing accurate quantitation of multiple different DNA targets by dPCR using probes with the same fluorophore.
Recent results from the droplet digital PCR (dPCR) shows that multiple independent PCR reactions can be run and separately quantified using the same fluorophore. Specifically, an SMN2 assay yields an unexpected population of droplets with slightly elevated signal in the FAM detection channel.
The results are depicted in
Without intending to be bound by any theory, the simplest explanation is that the cluster arises from weak association of the SMN2 probe to the SMN1 gene despite the presence of a blocker to that gene (a nonfluorescent complementary probe to the SMN1 gene).
One definitive confirmation of SMN1 as the source of the unexpected cluster was an observed dependence of the intensity of this feature on the presence of the SMN1 blocker. A clear shift toward higher FAM fluorescent intensities was observed in the absence of the blocker (
Without intending to be bound by any theory, these observations indicate that SMN2 probe binding to SMN1 DNA yields an elevated fluorescent signal. A simple kinetic model explaining this phenomenon assumes that the hybridization of the SMN2 probe to the SMN1 DNA achieves equilibrium at a faster rate than the polymerase fills in the complementary strand. The amount of probe fluorophore that is released in each thermal cycle is therefore proportional to (or even equal to) the number of bound probes. Thus the lower the binding affinity the fewer the number of probe fluorophores that are released. Due to SMN1 sequence mismatch(es) with the SMN2 probe, the affinity of the probe is certainly expected to be lower to SMN1 than SMN2. This model also explains the signal dependence on the sMN1 blocker: the blocker competitively inhibits the SMN2 probe hydrolysis by the polymerase exonuclease activity.
It may also be, however, that the probe hybridization does not reach equilibrium before exonuclease activity. In this case, the association rates would play a more dominant role. Similar logic applies. The binding rate to the matching site is likely to be faster than to the mismatch site, and the blocker would act to decelerate probe binding to the mismatch site. The binding of SMN2 probe to SMN1 DNA might be detectable by conventional bulk qPCR, especially in absence of SMN2, but highly quantitative results like those shown here are very unlikely. Definitely, there is no report of qPCR or any other technique quantifying two different DNA sequence motifs with the same color fluorophore. Sequestration of the individual reactions by single molecule amplification within droplets eliminates any confusion regarding mixed contributions to the signal.
The advantage of quantifying DNA with multiple probes of the same color fluorophore extends beyond the example of two highly homologous sequences shown here. Rather, any plurality of sequences of any degree of similarity or dissimilarity can be quantified so long as the different probes have significantly different binding occupancies to their respective DNA binding sites.
Another advantage of the dPCR approach for multiplexed reactions is that the different reactions do not compete with each other for reagents as they would in a bulk qPCR assay. However, the possibility for unintended cross-reactivity remains. A multiplexes assay can require a more dilute sample. For instance, at 10% occupancy a duplex reaction would have double occupancy 1% of the time. Hence 1 in 10 PCR+ droplets would be doubles, resulting in a final intensity at least as high and possibly higher than the brighter of the two probes. For a simple duplex system the contribution from each probe could be recovered. In this example the total number of PCR+ droplets for probe 1 would be (Probe 1)+(Probe1+Probe2). Higher degrees of multiplexing would require greater dilution. For example, for a 4-plex at 1% occupancy the probability of one probe overlapping any of the other 3 is ˜3%, and that error may be too high for some applications. The need for large dilutions strongly favors the large number of dPCR reactions.
In another example of the invention, a single fluorophore (FAM) was used in a gene copy number assay for both the reference and the target DNA. A model system was used with varying concentrations of plasmid DNA to represent a change in the target gene copy number, relative to a reference gene, equivalent to 0-16 copies of the target gene per cell. BCKDHA and SMN2 plasmid DNA served as the reference and target with 1× and 0.5× primers and probes respectively. With a starting ratio of 8:1 SMN2 to BCKDHA, the sample was diluted serially by 2× into a solution of BCKDHA at the same concentration to vary just the amount of SMN2. The resultant samples were emulsified, thermally cycled, and over 105 droplets were analyzed for each sample as described in the previous section. The process was repeated in triplicate.
Methods of the invention also include analytical techniques for identification of fluorescence signatures unique to each probe. In this example of the invention, histograms of the droplet fluorescence intensities are shown in
Detection of Alternatively Spliced Transcripts
The same principle can be used to detect and count alternatively spliced transcripts. TaqMan assays can be designed that are specific for each of the exons in an RNA transcript. After the RNA is turned into cDNA it can be encapsulated into a droplet at 1 copy or less per droplet. The droplet would also contain the multiplexed TaqMan assay for each of the exons. Each of the TaqMan assays would contain a different probe but all the probes would have the same fluorescent dye attached. The droplets would be thermocycled to generate signal for each of the TaqMan assays. If there are multiple splice variants in the sample they each will contain a different number of exons depending on the splicing events. The fluorescent intensity of each droplet would be different depending on the number of exons present. By counting the number of droplets with different intensities it would be possible to identify the presence and abundance of different splice variants in a sample.
Copy Number Variants in a Heterogeneous Sample
It would be possible to determine if a heterogeneous sample contained components with different copy level numbers. If the copy number variants to be assayed were spaced close enough along the chromosome, the DNA from a sample could be fragmented and encapsulated in droplets at a level of one haploid genomic equivalent or less per droplet. The droplet would also contain a TaqMan assay specific for the copy number variant. The intensity of the signal in each droplet would depend on the number of copy number variants are present for the sample. Counting of the number of droplets of different intensities would indicate things like how many cells in a particular sample had what level of copy number variants.
Tuning TaqMan® Probe Fluorescence Intensity
Identifying probes by fluorescence intensity often requires adjusting the brightness of the probes, particularly for higher-plex assays with dense probe patterns. In the previous section the probes for the gene copy number assay yielded very well resolved peaks (
Although the example above for adjusting probe fluorescence intensities involves varying probe and primer concentrations together by the same factor, the invention is not limited to this method alone for varying probe intensity. Other methods known to those familiar with the art for varying probe intensities are also considered. Such methods include varying just the probe concentration; varying just the primer concentrations; varying just the forward primer concentration; varying just the reverse primer concentration; varying the probe, forward, and reverse primers concentrations in any way; varying the thermal cycling program; varying the PCR master mix; incorporating into the assay some fraction of probes that lack fluorophores; or incorporating into the assay any hybridization-based competitive inhibitors to probe binding, such as blocking oligomer nucleotides, peptide nucleic acids, and locked nucleic acids. The invention incorporates the use of these methods adjusting probe fluorescence intensity, or any other methods for adjusting probe fluorescence intensity, used either by themselves or in any combination.
Higher-Plex Reactions
One method of the invention involves performing higher-plex assays with a single probe color (i.e. fluorophore). As described above, probe fluorescent intensities can be adjusted by a variety of means such that each intensity level uniquely identifies a DNA target. For example, targets T1, T2, T3, and T4 might be uniquely identified by intensity levels I1, I2, I3, and I4. Not intending to be bound by theory, the maximum number of intensity levels possible for unique identification of targets is related to the resolution of the different intensity levels—that is the spread of intensities for each particular probe compared to the separation between the average intensities of the probes—and it is also related to the intensity of the empty droplets that tends to grow with increasing numbers of probes. The number of intensity levels can be 0, or 1, or 2, or 3, or 4, or up to 10, or up to 20, or up to 50, or up to 100. The number of intensity levels can be higher than 100. In the examples show below, as many as three intensity levels are demonstrated.
Another method of the invention involves performing higher-plex assays using multiple different probe colors (i.e. fluorophores). As above for the monochromatic multiplexing assay, for each color probe, multiple targets can be identified based on intensity. Additionally, multiple colors that are spectrally separable can be used simultaneously. For example, a single droplet might contain four different probes for measuring four different targets. Two probes might be of color A with different intensities (say, A1 and A2), and the other two probes of color B with different intensities (say B1 and B2). The corresponding targets are T1, T2, T3, and T4 for A1, A2, B1, and B2 respectively. If a droplet shows an increase in fluoresce in color A, the droplet therefore contained either targets T1 or T2. Then, based on the fluorescence intensity of color A, the target could be identified as T1 or the target could be identified as T2. If, however, a droplet shows an increase in fluorescence in color B, the droplet therefore contained either targets T3 or T4. Then, based on the fluorescence intensity of color B, the target could be identified as T3 or the target could be identified as T4. Not intending to be bound by theory, the maximum number of different colors possible is limited by spectral overlap between fluorescence emission of the different fluorophores. The maximum number of colors can be 1, or 2, or 3, or 4, or up to 10, or up to 20. The maximum number of colors can be higher than 20. In the demonstrations that follow, the largest number of colors is two.
Another method of the invention involves performing higher-plex assays using multiple different probe colors (i.e. fluorophores), however unlike the strategy above where each target is identified by single type of probe with a unique color and intensity, instead in this method a single target may be identified by multiple probes that constitute a unique signature of both colors and intensities. For example, a single droplet might contain four different probes for measuring three different targets (say, T1, T2, and T3). Two probes might be of color A (say, A1, and A2), and two probes might be of color B (say, B1 and B2). T1 is measured by probe A1, T2 is measured by probe B1, but T3 is measured by both probes A2 and B2. Thus, when a droplet contains T1 only increased fluorescence appears in color A. When a droplet contains T2 only increased fluorescence appears in color B. However when a droplet contains T3, increased fluorescence appears in both colors A and B.
Generally, without wishing to be constrained by theory, the above three methods for higher-plex dPCR are simplest to implement under conditions of terminal dilution, that is when the probability of multiple different target molecules co-occupying the same droplet is very low compared to the probability of any single target occupying a droplet. With multiple occupancy arises the complexity of simultaneous assays competing within the same reaction droplet, and also complexity of assigning the resulting fluorescence intensity that involves a combination of fluorescence from two different reaction products that may or may not be equal to the sum of the two fluorescence intensities of the individual reaction products. However, methods of the invention can accommodate these complications arising from multiple occupancy.
Methods of the invention for higher-plex reactions also include methods for primer and probe pairing. In the simplest case targets are unlikely to reside on the same DNA fragments, such as when targets are from different cells; or when targets are from different chromosomes within a single cell type; or when targets are distant from each other within a single chromosome such that they become physically separated during DNA fragmentation; or when targets are very close to each other within a chromosome, but nevertheless become separated by targeted cleavage of the DNA, such as by restriction enzyme digestion; or for any other reason. In such cases each probe can be paired with a single set of primers (forward and reverse). However, in other cases the target regions might frequently reside on the same DNA fragments, for example when targets reside within the same codon, or for any other reason. In such cases, a single set of primers might serve for multiple probes (for an example, see Pekin et al.).
Higher multiplex reactions can be performed to distinguish the haplotypes of two SNPs. For example, assume that at position one there can be genotypes A or A′ and at position two there can be genotypes of B or B′. In a diploid genome four unique haplotypes are possible (A,B; A,B′; A′,B; and A′,B′). If for example A′ and B′ represent drug resistant mutations for infection, it is often the case that A′B and AB′ are less sever and treated differently than A′B′ which represents a significant drug resistance that must be treated with extreme care. Digital PCR with intensity discrimination is ideally suited for identifying low prevalence of A′B′ in a background of mixtures of the other three haplotypes. Haplotyping information is also important for construction of haplotypes in HLA. One way that the present example can be constructed is by assay design such that color one is used for A and is of high or low intensity indicative of allele A or A′ respectively and color two is used for B and is of high or low intensity respectively indicative of B or B′. Populations of [color1,color2] corresponding to [Low, Low] would be a measure of an allele of AB and [high, low] allele A′B and an allele of [A′B′] will be readily distinguishable as [high, high] even in a background that is predominately a mixture of A′B and AB′. See
5-Plex Assay for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
An aspect of the invention was reduced to practice in an example demonstration of the quantitation of several genetic markers for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). SMA was selected for one of the example demonstrations due to both its important clinical significance as well as its complicated genetics. It is the second-most prevalent fatal neurodegenerative disease and affects ˜1 in 10,000 live births. SMA is most often caused by homozygous absence of exon 7 within the survival of motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1, reviewed by Wirth et al.), however the severity of the condition is modulated by the number of gene copies of SMN2 with prognosis ranging from lethal to asymptomatic over 1-5 copy numbers (reviewed by Elsheikh et al.). Hence accurate quantitation of SMN2 copy number is important for clinical prognosis and genetic counseling. Aside from large deletions of SMN1, a number of single point mutations or short deletions/duplications within the same gene also account for ˜4% of cases of SMA. In a significant step toward a comprehensive SMA assay, the multiplexed dPCR assay demonstrated here contains both copy number assays (for SMN1 & 2) and an assay for one of the prevalent SNPs (c.815A>G).
One embodiment of the invention is a 5-plex assay for SMA diagnostics. The 5-plex assay quantifies common genetic variants impacting SMA including two copy number assays for the SMN1 and SMN2 genes with BCKDHA as a reference, and a SNP assay for the c.815A>G mutation. Two differently colored fluorophores, FAM and VIC, were used to uniquely identify each of the assays. The probes for SMN1 and SMN2 contained only FAM, and for c.815A only VIC. However, mixtures of VIC and FAM-labeled probes were used for BCKDHA and c.815G. The use of VIC and FAM fluorophores in this example does not limit the invention, rather the 5-plex assay can be used with any spectrally separable fluorophores compatible with the TaqMan assay, or any other fluorogenic hybridization-based probe chemistries. For validating the assay, a model chromosome was synthesized containing a single target region for each of the different primer/probe pairs. EcoRV restriction sites flanked each target, allowing separation of the fragments.
As another method of the invention, histogram-based data presentation and analysis is incorporated into the invention for identifying and characterizing statistically similar populations of droplets that arise from one probe signature (color and intensity), and for discriminating one population of droplets from the others.
In another method of the invention, the different populations were sufficiently well resolved to allow droplets within each population to be counted by integration across rectangular boundaries. The boundaries were positioned at mid-sections between neighboring peaks. The methods of the invention are not constrained to rectangular boundaries, or to specific boundary locations between peaks. Rather, any closed or unclosed boundary condition can suffice. Boundary conditions do not need to be “binary” either, in the sense that weighted integrations can also be performed across the boundaries to arrive at droplet counts. The peak position of each cluster varied by no more than 2% from run to run after normalization to the intensity of the empty droplets to account for variations in detection efficiency (data not shown). Hence, once identified, the same boundaries for integration could be reused between samples. The methods of the invention are not limited to fixed boundary positions. Dynamic population identification and boundary selection in between samples or studies is anticipated. Twenty different patient samples from the Coriell cell repositories were analyzed with this assay: 4 afflicted with SMA, 1 SMA carrier, and 15 negative controls. Assay results are shown in
The measured genotypes of the different patients were consistent with their disease conditions (unafflicted, carrier, or afflicted). The patients afflicted with SMA each had zero copies of SMN1 (numbers SMA 1-4 in
The SNP assay revealed that all patients carried the normal c.815A genotype and no instances of c.815G were observed. The mutation is relatively rare and hence was not expected to appear in a small patient panel. Of interest, however, was the presence of an apparent extra gene fragment in two unrelated individuals that was uncovered with the SNP assay. The c.815A>G assay does not discriminate between SMN1 and SMN2 due to their high sequence similarity, and hence the total copies of c.815A and G should equal the sum of the copies of SMN1 and SMN2. This was true for all patients except for healthy patients number 1 and 2, both of whom had one extra copy of c.815A. c.815 lies on exon 6, and the SNP that discriminates between the SMN1 and SMN2 genes lies on exon 7, hence the extra genes may be fragments of SMN1 lacking exon 7. This seems reasonable because the deletion of exon 7 is the common mutation causing 95% of cases of SMA (reviewed by Wirth et al.) and it is carried by 1/40 to 1/60 adults. Thus these patients might have been typical carriers of SMA but for the acquisition of at least one compensating healthy copy of SMN1 on the same chromosome.
9-Plex Assay for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
A 9-plex assay for certain SMA related targets was also demonstrated with just two colors (probes containing FAM and VIC fluorophores). Aside from the optimized primer and probe concentrations, assay conditions and experimental procedures were identical to the 5-plex assay above.
As one method of the invention, different droplet populations were identified by selective addition or exclusion of assays in the examples above. However the invention is not limited to this method alone. Rather, any method for population assignments known to those in the art are considered. Methods of the invention include any method that can cause an identifiable displacement, appearance, or disappearance of one or more populations within the histograms including changing the probe and primer concentrations together, either by the same factor or by different factors; changing the probe concentration alone; changing the primer concentrations alone; changing the thermal cycling conditions; and changing the master mix composition. Another method of the invention takes advantage of prior knowledge of the position of an assay within a histogram to assist assignment.
Multiplexing Capacity
The level of multiplexing demonstrated in the preceding SMA example was 9×, significantly exceeding the maximum practicable number with qPCR. Without wishing to be constrained by theory, the two main limitations are the resolution between assays and the increasing fluorescence intensity of empty droplets with higher loading of probes. A method of the invention involves optimizing the pattern of colors and intensities of the different probes for maximum multiplexing while still achieving adequate specificity for each individual reaction. Although rectangular arrays of droplet populations were demonstrated for the 5- and 9-plex reactions, another desirable pattern is the tight-packed hexagonal array. However the invention is not constrained to any particular array strategy.
Adding extra colors would increase the capability even further, however with some diminishing returns because the fluorescence of the empty droplets would continue to rise. The capacity could be yet further increased with better probes yielding larger differential signals, such as hybrid 5′-nuclease/molecular beacon probes that reduce background by contact quenching yet exhibit the bright signals typical of free unquenched fluorophores. With such improvements multiplexing capacity exceeding 50× can be envisioned.
Combined Multiplexing with Optical Labeling
Using droplet-based microfluidics, multiple targets can also be measured simultaneously by a different method. According to the alternative method, primers and probes can be loaded individually into droplets along with an optical label to uniquely identify the assay. Typically the optical label is a fluorophore, or a combination of different fluorophores, that are spectrally distinct from the probe fluorophore. Various different types of droplets, each containing different assays that are uniquely identified by different optical labels, can be mixed into a “library” of droplets. Then, according to methods of the invention above, library droplets are merged one-to-one with droplets containing template DNA. After thermal cycling, some droplets that contain template DNA will exhibit brighter fluorescence at the emission wavelengths of the probes. The specific target DNA molecules giving rise to these PCR(+) signals are subsequently identified by the optical probes. In one study, the six common mutations in KRAS codon 12 were screened in parallel in a single experiment by one-to-one fusion of droplets containing genomic DNA with any one of seven different types of droplets (a seven-member library), each containing a TaqMan® probe specific for a different KRAS mutation, of wild-type KRAS, and an optical code.
In one method of the invention, optical labeling can be combined with the various methods for multiplexing dPCR already incorporated into this invention. For example, a single optical label might code for the entire 5-plex SMA assay, above, instead of just a single assay as in the KRAS example above. In this manner, other optical labels might code for different screening assays for newborn infants. According to other methods of the invention, above, a single DNA sample from an infant could then be analyzed with all of the assays simultaneously by merging droplets containing the DNA one-to-one with library droplets containing the optically encoded assays.
As an example of combining multiplexing with optical labels, a so called 3×3×3 combination multiplex reaction with optical labeling was demonstrated (3×3 optical labeling with two fluorophores, each encoding a triplex assay, for a total of 27-plex). Two fluorophores were employed for optical labeling, Alexa633 and CF680 (excited by a 640 nm laser), with three intensity levels each producing nine total optical labels. As before with the 5- and 9-plex assays for SMA, TaqMan assays were used with FAM and VIC fluorophores (excited by a 488 nm laser). The fluorescence from the FAM and VIC fluorophores were recorded simultaneously with the fluorescence from the optical labels, requiring modifications to the optical layout of the instrumentation described for the SMA assay (the optical schematic for two-laser excitation and 4-color detection is shown in entirety in
Methods of the invention involve selecting individual populations of droplets all containing the same optical labels, or groups of optical labels. In some methods of the invention, boundaries of fluorescence intensity were used to specify populations. In the example shown here, a rectangular boundary was used specifying the minimum and maximum fluorescence intensities for each fluorophore. However the methods of the invention are not restricted to rectangular boundaries. Any boundary, closed or unclosed, can be employed. Furthermore, according to methods of the invention, selections of droplet populations can be made by any method, and is not restricted to threshold-based methods such as boundary selection.
In summary, the demonstration here shows use of nine different optical labels to enable independent measurement of three triplex assays in a single experiment. Although some of the optical labels encoded for redundant assays in this example (there were only three different assays despite having nine optical labels), the invention is not constrained to any particular formatting of assays and optical labels. Embodiments of the invention include formats where all of the assays are the same across all of the optical labels; where none of the assays are the same across all of the optical labels; where some of the assays are the same across all of the optical labels; where some of the assays have greater plexity than others across all of the optical labels; where all of the assays have the same plexity across all of the optical labels; and any other arrangements of assays across all of the optical labels are considered.
Although two different fluorophores were used to create the optical labels in this example, the invention is not constrained to any particular number of fluorophores comprising the optical labels. Embodiments of the invention include optical labels comprised of 1 fluorophore, or 2 fluorophores, or 3 fluorophores, or 4 fluorophores, or up to 10 fluorophores, or up to 20 fluorophores. Optical labels can also comprise more than 20 fluorophores.
Although solely triplex assays were used in the example demonstration here, the invention is not constrained to use of triplex assays with optical labels. Embodiments of the invention include plexities of the following amounts when used with optical labels: single plex, duplex, triplex, 4-plex, up to 10-plex, up to 20-plex, up to 50-plex, and up to 100-plex. Embodiments of the invention also include plexities exceeding 100 when used with optical labels.
Another method of the invention involves the use of droplet merging, instead of co-flow, for combining multiplexing with optical labels. A demonstration using droplet merging was performed with the same 3×3×3 assay as in the preceding example with co-flow. The assays (probes and primers) combined with their unique optical labels were first encapsulated into droplets along with the PCR master mix. Subsequently, according to methods of the invention described above, a library containing a mixture of droplets from all nine optically labeled assays was merged one-to-one with droplets containing template DNA from the same patient as in the preceding example. As another method of the invention, the droplet merge was performed using a lambda-injector style merge module, as described in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/441,985, incorporated by reference herein. Aside from the differences between co-flow and merge, the assays and experimental procedures were identical to those above for the co-flow experiment.
Although methods of the invention include using either microfluidics with co-flow or droplet merging, the invention is not limited in this regard. Any fluidic method capable of generating optically labeled droplets that also contain fluorogenic DNA hybridization probes are considered. For example, other embodiments well known in the art are mixing optical labels and assays in the macrofluidic environment before injection into a droplet generating chip; and mixing optical labels and assays thoroughly upstream from the droplet forming module in dedicated mixing modules, such as with a serpentine mixer.
Data Analysis
One method of the invention involves histogram-based data presentation and analysis for identifying and characterizing populations of statistically similar droplets that arise from unique probe signatures (color and intensity), and for discriminating one population of droplets from the others. Another method of the invention involves histogram-based data presentation and analysis for identifying and selecting populations of droplets based on unique signatures from optical labels. Examples of one and two-dimensional histograms have been provided for these methods, but the invention is not limited in this regard. As described above, it is anticipated that greater numbers of colors will be used for both multiplexing and for optical labels. Hence, embodiments of the invention include histograms of dimensionality greater than two, such as 3, or 4, or up to 10, or up to 20. Histograms of dimensionality greater than 20 are also incorporated into the invention.
Another method of the invention involves the selection of droplets within histograms, either for counting, or for assay selection as in the use of optical labels, or for any other purpose. Methods of the invention include selections by boundaries, either closed or unclosed, of any possible shape and dimension. Methods of the invention also include selections of droplets that exhibit fluorescence from single types of fluorophores, or from multiple types of fluorophores, such as arising from multiple probes against a common DNA target.
Polymerase Error Correction
For applications requiring very high sensitivity, such as searching for rare mutations amidst an abundance of wild-type DNA, false positive results can arise from errors from the DNA polymerase itself. For example, during one of the early thermal cycles the polymerase might synthesize the mutant strand of DNA from a wild-type template. This type of error is most likely to occur when the difference between the mutant and the wild-type is very small, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). In this method of the invention, each droplet contains only a single target nucleic acid, if any at all. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished under the conditions of terminal dilution. Droplets that contain amplification products that are a wild-type of the target are detected based on emission from the fluorophore that is released from the probe that hybridizes to the wild-type of the target. Droplets that contain the variant of the target are detected based on emission from the fluorophore that is released from the probe that hybridizes to the variant of the target. Since each droplet starts with only a single nucleic acid molecule, the resultant amplification products in each droplet are either homogeneous for the target or homogenous for the variant of the target.
However, certain droplets will contain a heterogeneous mixture of both target and target variant due to polymerase errors during the PCR reaction. Error rates in PCR vary according to the precise nucleic acid sequence, the thermostable enzyme used, and the in vitro conditions of DNA synthesis. For example, the error frequency (mutations per nucleotide per cycle) during PCR catalyzed by the thermostable Thermus aquaticus (Taq) DNA polymerase vary more than 10-fold, from −2×10−4 to <1×10−5. Eckert et al. (Genome Res. 1:17-24, 1991), the content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Polymerase-mediated errors at a frequency of 1 mutation per 10,000 nucleotides per cycle are an important consideration for any PCR application that begins with a small amount of starting material (e.g., less than a total of 10,000 nucleotides of target DNA) or that focuses on individual DNA molecules in the final PCR population.
The proportion of DNA molecules that contain sequence changes is a function of the error rate per nucleotide per cycle, the number of amplification cycles and the starting population size. The population of altered DNA molecules arises during PCR from two sources: (1) new errors at each PCR cycle; and (2) amplification of DNA molecules containing errors from previous cycles. The formula f=np/2 describes the average mutation frequency (f) for PCR amplification as a function of the polymerase error rate per nucleotide per cycle (p) and the number of cycles (n), assuming that p is constant at each cycle. Due to the exponential nature of PCR, the occurrence of an early error can increase the final error frequency above the average described by f=np/2, because the variant DNA molecule will be amplified with each cycle, resulting in populations with a larger than average number of variants.
A polymerase error that converts a wild-type of the target to a variant of the target during an early round of amplification results in a heterogeneous population of target and target variant in a droplet, and may lead to a droplet being incorrectly identified as containing a variant of the target, i.e., a false positive. Such false positives greatly impact the validity and precision of digital PCR results.
Methods of the invention are able to detect which droplets contain a heterogeneous population of molecules and are able to exclude those droplets from analysis. As droplets containing amplified product flow in a channel through the detector module, the module is able to detect the fluorescent emission in each droplet. Droplets that produce only a single signal are classified as droplets that contain a homogeneous population of target. Since probes that hybridize to the wild-type of the target have a different fluorophore attached than probes that hybridize to a variant of the wild-type of the target, methods of the invention can classify each droplet as containing either a homogeneous population of amplicons of the target or a homogeneous population of amplicons of the variant of the target.
Droplets that produce two signals are classified as droplets that contain a heterogeneous population of molecules. Since each droplet started with at most a single target nucleic acid, a droplet that includes amplification products that are both amplicons of the target and amplicons of a variant of the target are droplets in which the variant of the target was produced by a polymerase error during the PCR reaction, most likely a polymerase error during an early cycle of the PCR reaction. Such droplets are detected and excluded from analysis.
Analysis
Analyze is then performed on only the droplets that contain a homogeneous population of molecules. The analysis may be based on counting, i.e., determining a number of droplets that contain only wild-type target, and determining a number of droplets that contain only a variant of the target. Such methods are well known in the art. See, e.g., Lapidus et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,670,325 and 5,928,870) and Shuber et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,203,993 and 6,214,558), the content of each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Generally, the presence of droplets containing only variant is indicative of a disease, such as cancer. In certain embodiments, the variant is an allelic variant, such as an insertion, deletion, substitution, translocation, or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).
Biomarkers that are associated with cancer are known in the art. Biomarkers associated with development of breast cancer are shown in Erlander et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,504,214), Dai et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,514,209 and 7,171,311), Baker et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,056,674 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,340), Erlander et al. (US 2009/0092973). The contents of the patent application and each of these patents are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Biomarkers associated with development of cervical cancer are shown in Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Pardee et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,700), Kim (U.S. Pat. No. 6,905,844), Roberts et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,208), Schlegel (US 2008/0113340), Kwok et al. (US 2008/0044828), Fisher et al. (US 2005/0260566), Sastry et al. (US 2005/0048467), Lai (US 2008/0311570) and Van Der Zee et al. (US 2009/0023137). Biomarkers associated with development of vaginal cancer are shown in Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), Kruk (US 2008/0009005), Hellman et al. (Br J Cancer. 100(8):1303-1314, 2009). Biomarkers associated with development of brain cancers (e.g., glioma, cerebellum, medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, ependymoma, glioblastoma) are shown in D'Andrea (US 2009/0081237), Murphy et al. (US 2006/0269558), Gibson et al. (US 2006/0281089), and Zetter et al. (US 2006/0160762). Biomarkers associated with development of renal cancer are shown in Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Soyupak et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,482,129), Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Raitano (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), and Becker et al. (US 2007/0292869). Biomarkers associated with development of hepatic cancers (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) are shown in Horne et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,667), Yuan et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,018), Hanausek-Walaszek et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,653), and Liew et al. (US 2005/0152908). Biomarkers associated with development of gastric, gastrointestinal, and/or esophageal cancers are shown in Chang et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,532), Bae et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,255), Muramatsu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,983), Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Chow et al. (US 2008/0138806), Waldman et al. (US 2005/0100895), Goldenring (US 2008/0057514), An et al. (US 2007/0259368), Guilford et al. (US 2007/0184439), Wirtz et al. (US 2004/0018525), Filella et al. (Acta Oncol. 33(7):747-751, 1994), Waldman et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,704), and Lipkin et al. (Cancer Research, 48:235-245, 1988). Biomarkers associated with development of ovarian cancer are shown in Podust et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,842), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,291,462, 6,942,978, 6,316,213, 6,294,344, and 6,268,165), Ganetta (U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,180), Malinowski et al. (US 2009/0087849), Beyer et al. (US 2009/0081685), Fischer et al. (US 2009/0075307), Mansfield et al. (US 2009/0004687), Livingston et al. (US 2008/0286199), Farias-Eisner et al. (US 2008/0038754), Ahmed et al. (US 2007/0053896), Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), and Tchagang et al. (Mol Cancer Ther, 7:27-37, 2008). Biomarkers associated with development of head-and-neck and thyroid cancers are shown in Sidransky et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,378,233), Skolnick et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,815), Budiman et al. (US 2009/0075265), Hasina et al. (Cancer Research, 63:555-559, 2003), Kebebew et al. (US 2008/0280302), and Ralhan (Mol Cell Proteomics, 7(6):1162-1173, 2008). The contents of each of the articles, patents, and patent applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Biomarkers associated with development of colorectal cancers are shown in Raitano et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), Reinhard et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,501,244), Waldman et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,376); Schleyer et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,899); Reed (U.S. Pat. No. 7,163,801), Robbins et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,472), Mack et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,682,890), Tabiti et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,746), Budiman et al. (US 2009/0098542), Karl (US 2009/0075311), Arjol et al. (US 2008/0286801), Lee et al. (US 2008/0206756), Mori et al. (US 2008/0081333), Wang et al. (US 2008/0058432), Belacel et al. (US 2008/0050723), Stedronsky et al. (US 2008/0020940), An et al. (US 2006/0234254), Eveleigh et al. (US 2004/0146921), and Yeatman et al. (US 2006/0195269). Biomarkers associated with development of prostate cancer are shown in Sidransky (U.S. Pat. No. 7,524,633), Platica (U.S. Pat. No. 7,510,707), Salceda et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,432,064 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,364,862), Siegler et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,361,474), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), Ali et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,529), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,291,462), Golub et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,342), Ogden et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,841,350), An et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,796), Bergan et al. (US 2009/0124569), Bhowmick (US 2009/0017463), Srivastava et al. (US 2008/0269157), Chinnaiyan et al. (US 2008/0222741), Thaxton et al. (US 2008/0181850), Dahary et al. (US 2008/0014590), Diamandis et al. (US 2006/0269971), Rubin et al. (US 2006/0234259), Einstein et al. (US 2006/0115821), Paris et al. (US 2006/0110759), Condon-Cardo (US 2004/0053247), and Ritchie et al. (US 2009/0127454). Biomarkers associated with development of pancreatic cancer are shown in Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Rataino et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,507,541), Schleyer et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,476,506), Domon et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,531), McCaffey et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,358,231), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Chan et al. (US 2005/0095611), Mitchl et al. (US 2006/0258841), and Faca et al. (PLoS Med 5(6):e123, 2008). Biomarkers associated with development of lung cancer are shown in Sahin et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,933), Hutteman (U.S. Pat. No. 7,473,530), Bae et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,255), Wang (U.S. Pat. No. 7,348,142), Nacht et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,590), Gure et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,314,721), Patel (U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,765), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), O'Brien et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,291,462 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,213), Muramatsu et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,090,983), Carson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,576,420), Giordano (U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,506), Guo (US 2009/0062144), Tsao et al. (US 2008/0176236), Nakamura et al. (US 2008/0050378), Raponi et al. (US 2006/0252057), Yip et al. (US 2006/0223127), Pollock et al. (US 2006/0046257), Moon et al. (US 2003/0224509), and Budiman et al. (US 2009/0098543). Biomarkers associated with development of skin cancer (e.g., basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma) are shown in Roberts et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,316,208), Polsky (U.S. Pat. No. 7,442,507), Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Genetta (U.S. Pat. No. 7,078,180), Carson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,576,420), Moses et al. (US 2008/0286811), Moses et al. (US 2008/0268473), Dooley et al. (US 2003/0232356), Chang et al. (US 2008/0274908), Alani et al. (US 2008/0118462), Wang (US 2007/0154889), and Zetter et al. (US 2008/0064047). Biomarkers associated with development of multiple myeloma are shown in Coignet (U.S. Pat. No. 7,449,303), Shaughnessy et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,308,364), Seshi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,072), and Shaughnessy et al. (US 2008/0293578, US 2008/0234139, and US 2008/0234138). Biomarkers associated with development of leukemia are shown in Ando et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,371), Coignet (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,370 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,449,303), Davi et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,416,851), Chiorazzi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,316,906), Seshi (U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,072), Van Baren et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,052), Taniguchi (U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,729), Insel et al. (US 2009/0131353), and Van Bockstaele et al. (Blood Rev. 23(1):25-47, 2009). Biomarkers associated with development of lymphoma are shown in Ando et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,371), Levy et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,280), and Arnold (U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,655). Biomarkers associated with development of bladder cancer are shown in Price et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,770), Orntoft (U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,417), Haak-Frendscho et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,003), Feinstein et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,998,232), Elting et al. (US 2008/0311604), and Wewer et al. (2009/0029372). The content of each of the above references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
In certain embodiments, methods of the invention may be used to monitor a patient for recurrence of a cancer. Since the patient has already been treated for the cancer, the genetic profile and particular mutation(s) associated with that patient's cancer are already known. Probes may be designed that specifically hybridize to the region of the nucleic acid that contains the mutation(s) that is indicative of the cancer for which the patient was previously treated. A patient's sample (e.g., pus, sputum, semen, urine, blood, saliva, stool, or cerebrospinal fluid) may then be analyzed as described above to determine whether the mutant allele(s) is detected in the sample, the presence of which being indicative of recurrence of the cancer.
Droplet Sorting
Methods of the invention may further include sorting the droplets based upon whether the droplets contain a homogeneous population of molecules or a heterogeneous population of molecules. A sorting module may be a junction of a channel where the flow of droplets can change direction to enter one or more other channels, e.g., a branch channel, depending on a signal received in connection with a droplet interrogation in the detection module. Typically, a sorting module is monitored and/or under the control of the detection module, and therefore a sorting module may correspond to the detection module. The sorting region is in communication with and is influenced by one or more sorting apparatuses.
A sorting apparatus includes techniques or control systems, e.g., dielectric, electric, electro-osmotic, (micro-) valve, etc. A control system can employ a variety of sorting techniques to change or direct the flow of molecules, cells, small molecules or particles into a predetermined branch channel. A branch channel is a channel that is in communication with a sorting region and a main channel. The main channel can communicate with two or more branch channels at the sorting module or branch point, forming, for example, a T-shape or a Y-shape. Other shapes and channel geometries may be used as desired. Typically, a branch channel receives droplets of interest as detected by the detection module and sorted at the sorting module. A branch channel can have an outlet module and/or terminate with a well or reservoir to allow collection or disposal (collection module or waste module, respectively) of the molecules, cells, small molecules or particles. Alternatively, a branch channel may be in communication with other channels to permit additional sorting.
A characteristic of a fluidic droplet may be sensed and/or determined in some fashion, for example, as described herein (e.g., fluorescence of the fluidic droplet may be determined), and, in response, an electric field may be applied or removed from the fluidic droplet to direct the fluidic droplet to a particular region (e.g. a channel). In certain embodiments, a fluidic droplet is sorted or steered by inducing a dipole in the uncharged fluidic droplet (which may be initially charged or uncharged), and sorting or steering the droplet using an applied electric field. The electric field may be an AC field, a DC field, etc. For example, a channel containing fluidic droplets and carrier fluid, divides into first and second channels at a branch point. Generally, the fluidic droplet is uncharged. After the branch point, a first electrode is positioned near the first channel, and a second electrode is positioned near the second channel. A third electrode is positioned near the branch point of the first and second channels. A dipole is then induced in the fluidic droplet using a combination of the electrodes. The combination of electrodes used determines which channel will receive the flowing droplet. Thus, by applying the proper electric field, the droplets can be directed to either the first or second channel as desired. Further description of droplet sorting is shown for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to Raindance Technologies Inc.
Based upon the detected signal at the detection module, droplets containing a heterogeneous population of molecules are sorted away from droplets that contain a homogeneous population of molecules. Droplets may be further sorted to separate droplets that contain a homogeneous population of amplicons of the target from droplets that contain a homogeneous population of amplicons of the variant of the target.
Release of Target from Droplet
Methods of the invention may further involve releasing amplified target molecules from the droplets for further analysis. Methods of releasing amplified target molecules from the droplets are shown in for example in Link et al. (U.S. patent application numbers 2008/0014589, 2008/0003142, and 2010/0137163) and European publication number EP2047910 to RainDance Technologies Inc.
In certain embodiments, sample droplets are allowed to cream to the top of the carrier fluid. By way of non-limiting example, the carrier fluid can include a perfluorocarbon oil that can have one or more stabilizing surfactants. The droplet rises to the top or separates from the carrier fluid by virtue of the density of the carrier fluid being greater than that of the aqueous phase that makes up the droplet. For example, the perfluorocarbon oil used in one embodiment of the methods of the invention is 1.8, compared to the density of the aqueous phase of the droplet, which is 1.0.
The creamed liquids are then placed onto a second carrier fluid which contains a de-stabilizing surfactant, such as a perfluorinated alcohol (e.g. 1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluoro-1-octanol). The second carrier fluid can also be a perfluorocarbon oil. Upon mixing, the aqueous droplets begins to coalesce, and coalescence is completed by brief centrifugation at low speed (e.g., 1 minute at 2000 rpm in a microcentrifuge). The coalesced aqueous phase can now be removed and the further analyzed.
The released amplified material can also be subjected to further amplification by the use tailed primers and secondary PCR primers. In this embodiment the primers in the droplet contain an additional sequence or tail added onto the 5′ end of the sequence specific portion of the primer. The sequences for the tailed regions are the same for each primer pair and are incorporated onto the 5′ portion of the amplicons during PCR cycling. Once the amplicons are removed from the droplets, another set of PCR primers that can hybridize to the tail regions of the amplicons can be used to amplify the products through additional rounds of PCR. The secondary primers can exactly match the tailed region in length and sequence or can themselves contain additional sequence at the 5′ ends of the tail portion of the primer. During the secondary PCR cycling these additional regions also become incorporate into the amplicons. These additional sequences can include, but are not limited to adaptor regions utilized by sequencing platforms for library preparation and sequencing, sequences used as a barcoding function for the identification of samples multiplexed into the same reaction. molecules for the separation of amplicons from the rest of the reaction materials such as biotin, digoxin, peptides, or antibodies and molecules such as fluorescent markers that can be used to identify the fragments.
In certain embodiments, the amplified target molecules are sequenced. In a particular embodiment, the sequencing is single-molecule sequencing-by-synthesis. Single-molecule sequencing is shown for example in Lapidus et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 7,169,560), Quake et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,395), Harris (U.S. Pat. No. 7,282,337), Quake et al. (U.S. patent application number 2002/0164629), and Braslavsky, et al., PNAS (USA), 100: 3960-3964 (2003), the contents of each of these references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Briefly, a single-stranded nucleic acid (e.g., DNA or cDNA) is hybridized to oligonucleotides attached to a surface of a flow cell. The single-stranded nucleic acids may be captured by methods known in the art, such as those shown in Lapidus (U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,593). The oligonucleotides may be covalently attached to the surface or various attachments other than covalent linking as known to those of ordinary skill in the art may be employed. Moreover, the attachment may be indirect, e.g., via the polymerases of the invention directly or indirectly attached to the surface. The surface may be planar or otherwise, and/or may be porous or non-porous, or any other type of surface known to those of ordinary skill to be suitable for attachment. The nucleic acid is then sequenced by imaging the polymerase-mediated addition of fluorescently-labeled nucleotides incorporated into the growing strand surface oligonucleotide, at single molecule resolution.
Experimental Detail
What follows is experimental detail for the various experiments details above.
All TaqMan® primers and probes used here are listed in Table 2. Unless otherwise noted by reference in the table, the primers and probes were designed with the “Custom TaqMan® Assay Design Tool” from Applied Biosystems Inc. (ABI) and procured through ABI (Carlsbad, Calif.). Probes were labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM, λe 494 nm\λem 494 nm) or VIC™ (from ABI, λex 538 nm\λem 554 nm).
Target DNA
For some genetic targets, BCKDHA and SMN2, plasmid DNA was synthesized (GeneArt, Regensburg, Germany) containing the sequence spanning between the primers (see Table 2) and cloned into the GeneArt standard vector (2.5 kb). The target fragment was released from the cloning vector by restriction digestion with SfiI to avoid any DNA supercoiling that might affect the assay. For simplicity, these gene fragments are called “plasmid DNA” throughout the text. A string of different gene fragments was also synthesized (GeneArt) and cloned into the GeneArt standard vector for demonstration of multiplexed reactions, called an “artificial chromosome” in the text. In this case, the fragments were separated from each other by restriction digestion at flanking EcoRV sites. Human DNA was obtained in already purified form from cell lines (See Table 3; Coriell, Camden, N.J.) and fragmented before use with a K7025-05 nebulizer following manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). DNA concentration was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm on a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, Del.).
Microfluidics
Microfluidic chips were manufactured by conventional soft lithography. Molding masters were fabricated by spin coating SU-8 negative photoresist (MicroChem. Corp., Newton, Mass.) onto 6 inch silicon wafers and transferring the fluidic features from photomasks (CAD/Art Services, Bandon, Oreg.) by contact lithography with an OAI Hybralign Series 200 aligner (OAI, San Jose, Calif.). Chips contained channels with two depths: deep channels with low hydrodynamic resistance (100±10 um) for transporting fluid from external ports to the functional regions of the chip, and shallow channels (20±1 um) for droplet manipulation and detection. SU-8 photoresists 2100 and 2025 were used for deep and shallow channels respectively. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (Sylgard® 184, Dow Corning, Midland, Mich.) chips were molded from the negative masters within mold housings of custom design. Glass cover slides were permanently bonded to the fluidic side of the chips by surface activation in an AutoGlow™ oxygen plasma system (Glow Research, Phoenix, Ariz.) followed by immediate contact bonding. To create hydrophobic surfaces, the microfluidic channels were exposed for ˜2 min to 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, Mass.) dissolved in FC-3283 (3M Specialty Materials, St. Paul, Minn.) prepared as a mixture of 18 g silane in 100 uL solvent.
Two different microfluidic devices were used, one for droplet generation and the other for fluorescence readout after thermal cycling. The droplet generation chip created an emulsion of uniformly sized aqueous droplets of template DNA and PCR master mix that were suspended in an inert fluorinated oil with an emulsion stabilizing surfactant, called “carrier oil” from this point forward (REB carrier oil; RainDance Technologies, Lexington, Mass.). Droplets were generated in a cross-shaped microfluidic intersection, or “nozzle”. As shown in
Approximately 25 uL of the PCR reaction mixture was collected as an emulsion from the droplet generation chip and thermally cycled in a DNA Engine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). The reaction mixture contained 1× TaqMan® universal PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, Calif.), 0.2 mM dNTP (Takara Bio, Madison, Wis.), and various amounts of primer pairs and probes as described in the results. 1× assay concentration is defined as 0.2 μM probes with 0.9 μM primers. In all cases, when varied from the 1× concentration, the primers and probes were varied by the same amount. The cycler program included a 10 min hot start at 95° C., and 45 cycles of 15 s at 95° C. and 60 s at 60° C.
The droplets became concentrated during off-chip handling because the carrier oil is more dense than the aqueous phase and drained down from the emulsion. Hence the droplets were reinjected into the readout chip as a tightly packed emulsion that required dilution prior to readout to properly distinguish one droplet from another. A “spacer” nozzle similar to the droplet generation nozzle above was used to inject uniform plugs of extra carrier oil between droplets immediately before readout. As shown in
Instrumentation
Fluorescence readout was performed by conventional epifluorescence microscopy with a custom microscope. A 20 mW, 488 nm laser source (Cyan; Picarro, Sunnyvale, Calif.) was expanded 2× and focused by the objective lens (20×/0.45 NA; Nikon, Japan) onto the microfluidic channel. Two band pass filters discriminated the fluorescence collected through the objective lens: 512/25 nm and 529/28 nm for FAM and VIC fluorophores respectively (Semrock, Rochester, N.Y.). Fluorescence was detected by two H5784-20 photomultipliers (Hamamatsu, Japan) and was typically recorded at a 200 kHz sampling rate with a USB-6259 data acquisition card (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.). The data traces were smoothed by a seven-point, second-order Savitzky-Golay algorithm before subsequent analysis. Concurrent with the fluorescence read out, the droplets were imaged through the same objective lens with backside illumination from an 850 nm LED (TSHG6200; Vishay Semiconductors, Shelton, Conn.), a short pass filter to separate the optical paths for fluorescence detection and imaging, and a Guppy CCD camera (Allied Vision Technologies, Newburyport, Mass.). Droplets were imaged with short illumination pulses (5-20 us) to avoid image streaking.
Data Analysis
Data was analyzed with custom LabView software (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.) that interpreted droplet events as contiguous bursts of fluorescence intensity above a threshold value. The signal-to-noise ratio was generally quite high and the signal levels were consistent from day to day, hence a fixed threshold value of 50 mV was used predominantly, otherwise the threshold was set by eye. The peak fluorescence intensity was recorded for each droplet event for both VIC and FAM fluorophores. Some coalescence of droplets did occur during thermal cycling, typically as isolated events between two intact droplets forming “doublets.” Doublets and the rare larger coalesced events were easily filtered from the data set on based on the duration of the fluorescence burst.
References and citations to other documents, such as patents, patent applications, patent publications, journals, books, papers, web contents, have been made throughout this disclosure. All such documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein.
This non-provisional application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/388,937, filed Oct. 1, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/347,158, filed May 21, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/331,490, filed, May 5, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/304,163, filed Feb. 12, 2010, the contents of which are each incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2097692 | Fiegel | Nov 1937 | A |
| 2164172 | Dalton | Jun 1939 | A |
| 2656508 | Coulter | Oct 1953 | A |
| 2692800 | Nichols et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
| 2797149 | Skeggs | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2879141 | Skeggs | Mar 1959 | A |
| 2971700 | Peeps | Feb 1961 | A |
| 3479141 | Smythe et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3608821 | Simm et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3698635 | Sickles | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3816331 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3930061 | Scharfenberger | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3960187 | Stock et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3980541 | Aine | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3982541 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4014469 | Sato | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4022575 | Hansen et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4034966 | Suh et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4059552 | Zweigle et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4091042 | Alexanderson et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4117550 | Folland et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4130394 | Negersmith | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4210809 | Pelavin | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4253846 | Smythe et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4266721 | Sickles | May 1981 | A |
| 4279345 | Allred | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4297345 | Howarth | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4315754 | Ruzicka et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4378957 | Malkin et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4383767 | Jido | May 1983 | A |
| 4439980 | Biblarz et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4508265 | Jido | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4533634 | Maldonado et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4585209 | Aine et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4618476 | Columbus | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4675285 | Clark et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4676274 | Brown | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4683195 | Mullis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4739044 | Stabinsky | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4757141 | Fung et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4767515 | Scott et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4767929 | Valentine | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4779805 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4801086 | Noakes | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4801529 | Perlman | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4829996 | Noakes et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4853336 | Saros et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4865444 | Green et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4883750 | Whiteley et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4908112 | Pace | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4931225 | Cheng | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4941959 | Scott | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4962885 | Coffee | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4963498 | Hillman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4981580 | Auer | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4996004 | Bucheler et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5091652 | Mathies et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096615 | Prescott et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5122360 | Harris et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5180662 | Sitkovsky | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185099 | Delpuech et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188290 | Gebauer et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188291 | Cross | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5204112 | Hope et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207973 | Harris et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5241159 | Chatteriee et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5260466 | McGibbon | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5262027 | Scott | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5270163 | Gold et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5296375 | Kricka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304487 | Wilding et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5310653 | Hanausek-Walaszek et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5313009 | Guenkel et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5344594 | Sheridon | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5378957 | Kelly | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397605 | Barbieri et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5399461 | Van et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5399491 | Kacian et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5403617 | Haaland | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413924 | Kosak et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417235 | Wise et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5427946 | Kricka et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5445934 | Fodor et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5452878 | Gravesen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452955 | Lundstrom | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454472 | Benecke et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460945 | Springer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5475096 | Gold et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480614 | Kamahori | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486335 | Wilding et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5498392 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500415 | Dollat et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5503851 | Mank et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5516635 | Ekins et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5518709 | Sutton et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5523162 | Franz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5587128 | Wilding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5604097 | Brenner | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5612188 | Shuler et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616478 | Chetverin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5617997 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5635358 | Wilding et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5636400 | Young | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641658 | Adams et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5643729 | Taniguchi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655517 | Coffee | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5656155 | Norcross et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661222 | Hare | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662874 | David | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670325 | Lapidus et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5681600 | Antinone et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5695934 | Brenner | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5726026 | Wilding et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726404 | Brody | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733526 | Trevino et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739036 | Parris | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744366 | Kricka et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5750988 | Apffel et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762775 | DePaoli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779868 | Parce et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783431 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5840506 | Giordano | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5846719 | Brenner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849491 | Radomski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858187 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858655 | Arnold | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858670 | Lam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5863722 | Brenner | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868322 | Loucks, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872010 | Karger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876771 | Sizer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880071 | Parce et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882680 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884846 | Tan | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887755 | Hood, III | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888746 | Tabiti et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888778 | Shuber | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5904933 | Riess et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5921678 | Desai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5927852 | Serafin | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928870 | Lapidus et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935331 | Naka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942056 | Singh | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942443 | Parce et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5958203 | Parce et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5972187 | Parce et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980936 | Krafft et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989815 | Skolnick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989892 | Nishimaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995341 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997636 | Gamarnik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008003 | Haak-Frendscho et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6023540 | Walt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028066 | Unger | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6042709 | Parce et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045755 | Lebl et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6046056 | Parce et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048551 | Hilfinger et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068199 | Coffee | May 2000 | A |
| 6080295 | Parce et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086740 | Kennedy | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096495 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103537 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105571 | Coffee | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105877 | Coffee | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6116516 | Ganan-Calvo | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6118849 | Tanimori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119953 | Ganan-Calvo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120666 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124388 | Takai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124439 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6130052 | Van Baren et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130098 | Handique et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137214 | Raina | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6138077 | Brenner | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139303 | Reed et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140053 | Koster | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143496 | Brown et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6149789 | Benecke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6150180 | Parce et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6150516 | Brenner et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165778 | Kedar | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171796 | An et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171850 | Nagle et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172214 | Brenner | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172218 | Brenner | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174160 | Lee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174469 | Ganan-Calvo | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180372 | Franzen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184012 | Neri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187214 | Ganan-Calvo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6189803 | Ganan-Calvo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196525 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6197335 | Sherman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6197835 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203993 | Shuber et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210396 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210891 | Nyren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210896 | Chan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214558 | Shuber et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221654 | Quake et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6227466 | Hartman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6234402 | Ganan-Calvo | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235383 | Hong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235475 | Brenner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241159 | Ganan-Calvo et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6243373 | Turock | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248378 | Ganan-Calvo | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251661 | Urabe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252129 | Coffee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258568 | Nyren | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258858 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263222 | Diab et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266459 | Walt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267353 | Friedline et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267858 | Parce et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268165 | O'Brien | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268222 | Chandler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6274320 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6274337 | Parce et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6294344 | O'Brien | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296673 | Santarsiero et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6299145 | Ganan-Calvo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301055 | Legrand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306659 | Parce et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310354 | Hanninen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310653 | Malcolm, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6316208 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6316213 | O'Brien | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318640 | Coffee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6336463 | Ohta | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344325 | Quake et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6352828 | Brenner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355193 | Stott | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355198 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6357670 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6386463 | Ganan-Calvo | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391559 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6394429 | Ganan-Calvo | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6399339 | Wolberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6399389 | Parce et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403373 | Scanlan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405936 | Ganan-Calvo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408878 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6409832 | Weigl et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6429025 | Parce et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6429148 | Chu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432143 | Kubiak et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6432148 | Ganan-Calvo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6439103 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440706 | Vogelstein et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6450139 | Watanabe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450189 | Ganan-Calvo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454193 | Busick et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6464336 | Sharma | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464886 | Ganan-Calvo | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6475441 | Parce et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6481648 | Zimmermann | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6489103 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503933 | Moloney et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6506609 | Wada et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6508988 | Van Dam et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6520425 | Reneker | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524456 | Ramsey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6540395 | Muhlbauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6540895 | Spence et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6551836 | Chow et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553944 | Allen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553960 | Yoshikawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554202 | Ganan-Calvo | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6557334 | Jager | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6557834 | Ganan-Calvo | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6558944 | Parce et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6558960 | Parce et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6560030 | Legrand et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565010 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6569631 | Pantoliano et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6576420 | Carson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6591852 | McNeely et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6592321 | Bonker et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6592821 | Wada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6608726 | Legrand et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610499 | Fulwyler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6614598 | Quake et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6627603 | Bibette et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6630006 | Santarsiero et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6630353 | Parce et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6632619 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638749 | Beckman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6645432 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6646253 | Rohwer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6653626 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6656267 | Newman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6659370 | Inoue | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660252 | Matathia et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6670142 | Lau et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6679441 | Borra et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6680178 | Harris et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682890 | Mack et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6717136 | Andersson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6729561 | Hirae et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6739036 | Koike et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6744046 | Valaskovic et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752922 | Huang et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753147 | Vogelstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6767194 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6767704 | Waldman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6790328 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6793753 | Unger et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6797056 | David | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800849 | Staats | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806058 | Jesperson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808382 | Lanfranchi | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808882 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6814980 | Levy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818395 | Quake et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6832787 | Renzi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6833242 | Quake et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6841350 | Ogden et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6872250 | David et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6890487 | Sklar et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6897018 | Yuan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6905844 | Kim | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6918404 | Dias da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926313 | Renzi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6935768 | Lowe et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936417 | Orntoft | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942978 | O'Brien | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6949342 | Golub et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6960437 | Enzelberger et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974667 | Horne et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6998232 | Feinstein et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7022472 | Robbins et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7041481 | Anderson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049072 | Seshi | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056674 | Baker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7057026 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066586 | da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7068874 | Wang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7078180 | Genetta | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081192 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7081340 | Baker et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7090983 | Muramatsu et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7115230 | Sundararajan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7118910 | Unger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7129091 | Ismagilov et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7138233 | Griffiths et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7153700 | Pardee et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7156917 | Moriyama et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163801 | Reed | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7169560 | Lapidus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171311 | Dai et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7198899 | Schleyer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7204431 | Li et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7229770 | Price et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7252943 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7267938 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7268167 | Higuchi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7282337 | Harris | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7291462 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7294503 | Quake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7300765 | Patel | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7308364 | Shaughnessy et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7314721 | Gure et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7316906 | Chiorazzi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7326529 | Ali et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7332280 | Levy et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7332590 | Nacht et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7341211 | Ganan Calvo et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7348142 | Wang | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7358231 | McCaffey et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7361474 | Siegler | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7364862 | Ali et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7368255 | Bae et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7378233 | Sidransky et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7378280 | Quake et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7390463 | He et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393665 | Brenner | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7416851 | Davi et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7429467 | Holliger et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7432064 | Salceda et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7442507 | Polsky et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7449303 | Coignet | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7468271 | Golovchenko et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7473530 | Huttemann | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7473531 | Domon et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7476506 | Schleyer et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479370 | Coignet | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479371 | Ando et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479376 | Waldman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7482129 | Soyupak et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7501244 | Reinhard et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7504214 | Erlander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7507532 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7507541 | Raitano et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510707 | Platica et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510842 | Podust et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514209 | Dai et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7514210 | Holliger et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524633 | Sidransky | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7527933 | Sahin et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7537897 | Brenner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7541383 | Fu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7544473 | Brenner | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7556776 | Fraden et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7582446 | Griffiths et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7622081 | Chou et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7632562 | Nair et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635562 | Harris et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7638276 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7655435 | Holliger et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7655470 | Ismagilov et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666593 | Lapidus | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7691576 | Holliger et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698287 | Becker et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7708949 | Stone et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7718578 | Griffiths et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7736890 | Sia et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7741130 | Lee, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7814175 | Chang et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7824889 | Vogelstein et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7897044 | Hoyos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7897341 | Griffiths et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7901939 | Ismagliov et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7968287 | Griffiths et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8012382 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8153402 | Holliger et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 20010010338 | Ganan-Calvo | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010020011 | Mathiowitz et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010023078 | Bawendi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029983 | Unger et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034031 | Short et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041343 | Pankowsky | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041344 | Sepetov et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010042793 | Ganan-Calvo | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048900 | Bardell et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010050881 | Depaoli et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004532 | Matathia et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020005354 | Spence et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020008028 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012971 | Mehta | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022038 | Biatry et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022261 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020033422 | Ganan-Calvo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020036139 | Becker et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067800 | Newman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119459 | Griffiths | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143437 | Handique et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155080 | Glenn et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158027 | Moon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164271 | Ho | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164629 | Quake et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030012586 | Iwata et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015425 | Bohm et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017579 | Corn et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039169 | Ehrfeld et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059764 | Ravkin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061687 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064414 | Benecky et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030082795 | Shuler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124586 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144260 | Gilon | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148544 | Nie et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183525 | Elrod et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224509 | Moon et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229376 | Sandhu | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230486 | Chien et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232356 | Dooley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005582 | Shipwash | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040005594 | Holliger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040018525 | Wirtz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027915 | Lowe et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037813 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040041093 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050946 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053247 | Cordon-Cardo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068019 | Higuchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071781 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040079881 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086892 | Crothers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096515 | Bausch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136497 | Meldrum et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146921 | Eveleigh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159633 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181131 | Maynard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181343 | Wigstrom et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182712 | Basol | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188254 | Spaid | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224419 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040253731 | Holliger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258203 | Yamano et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050032238 | Karp et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032240 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037392 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042648 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048467 | Sastry et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064460 | Holliger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069920 | Griffiths et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079510 | Berka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084923 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087122 | Ismagliov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050095611 | Chan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100895 | Waldman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050129582 | Breidford et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050152908 | Liew et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050164239 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050170431 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172476 | Stone et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183995 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207940 | Butler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221339 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226742 | Unger et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227264 | Nobile et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260566 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272159 | Ismagilov et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003347 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060003429 | Frost et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060003439 | Ismagilov et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036348 | Handique et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046257 | Pollock et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051329 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078888 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078893 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094119 | Ismagilov et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060108012 | Barrow et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110759 | Paris et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115821 | Einstein et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147909 | Rarbach et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153924 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154298 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160762 | Zetter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163385 | Link et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060169800 | Rosell et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195269 | Yeatman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060223127 | Yip et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234254 | An et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234259 | Rubin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252057 | Raponi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258841 | Michl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060263888 | Fritz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269558 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269971 | Diamandis | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281089 | Gibson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003442 | Link et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026439 | Faulstich et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053896 | Ahmed et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054119 | Garstecki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056853 | Aizenberg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070077572 | Tawfik et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070077579 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070092914 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120899 | Ohnishi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154889 | Wang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166705 | Milton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184439 | Guilford et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184489 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195127 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259351 | Chinitz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259368 | An et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259374 | Griffiths et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292869 | Becker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009005 | Kruk | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080014589 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080014590 | Dahary et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020940 | Stedronsky et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021330 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080023330 | Viovy et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038754 | Farias-Eisner et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044828 | Kwok | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050378 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050723 | Belacel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080053205 | Pollack et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080057514 | Goldenring | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080058432 | Wang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063227 | Rohrseitz | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080064047 | Zetter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081330 | Kahvejian | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081333 | Mori et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092973 | Lai | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113340 | Schlegel | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118462 | Alani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138806 | Chow et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080166772 | Hollinger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080171078 | Gray | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176211 | Spence et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176236 | Tsao et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181850 | Thaxton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206756 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222741 | Chinnaiyan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234138 | Shaughnessy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234139 | Shaughnessy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268473 | Moses et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269157 | Srivastava et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274908 | Chang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280302 | Kebebew | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286199 | Livingston et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286801 | Arjol et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286811 | Moses et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293578 | Shaugnessy et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311570 | Lai | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311604 | Elting et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004687 | Mansfield et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090005254 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090012187 | Chu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090017463 | Bhowmick | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090021728 | Heinz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090023137 | Van Der Zee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090026082 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090029372 | Wewer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042737 | Katz et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053700 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053732 | Vermesh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060797 | Mathies et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062144 | Guo | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068170 | Weitz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075265 | Budiman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075307 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075311 | Karl | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081237 | D'Andrea et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081685 | Beyer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087849 | Malinowski et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092973 | Erlander et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098542 | Budiman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098543 | Budiman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118128 | Liu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124569 | Bergan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127454 | Ritchie et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127589 | Rothberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131353 | Insel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131543 | Weitz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191565 | Lapidus et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197248 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197772 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090246788 | Albert et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325236 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003687 | Simen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100009353 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100022414 | Link et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100035252 | Rothberg et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100075436 | Urdea et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105112 | Holtze et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100111768 | Banerjee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100124759 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136544 | Agresti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137143 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137163 | Link et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100159592 | Holliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172803 | Stone et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173293 | Woudenberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188073 | Rothberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197507 | Rothberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210479 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100213628 | Bausch et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233026 | Ismagliov et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282617 | Rothberg et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300559 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300895 | Nobile et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301398 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304982 | Hinz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110000560 | Miller et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142734 | Ismagliov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110174622 | Ismagilov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176966 | Ismagilov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177494 | Ismagilov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177586 | Ismagilov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110177609 | Ismagilov et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188717 | Baudry et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190146 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110244455 | Larson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250597 | Larson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110275063 | Weitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120010098 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120015382 | Weitz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120015822 | Weitz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004225691 | Jun 2010 | AU |
| 2520548 | Oct 2004 | CA |
| 563807 | Jul 1975 | CH |
| 4308839 | Apr 1997 | DE |
| 0047130 | Feb 1985 | EP |
| 0249007 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0476178 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0540281 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 0528580 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0895120 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 1741482 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 2127736 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 0114854.3 | Apr 1969 | GB |
| 1446998 | Aug 1976 | GB |
| 2005224 | Apr 1979 | GB |
| 2047880 | Dec 1980 | GB |
| 2062225 | May 1981 | GB |
| 2064114 | Jun 1981 | GB |
| 2097692 | Nov 1982 | GB |
| 0221053.2 | Jun 1989 | GB |
| 3-232525 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 2000271475 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| WO-8402000 | May 1984 | WO |
| WO-9105058 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| WO-9107772 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO-9203734 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO-9221746 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO-9303151 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| WO-9308278 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO-9322053 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO9322054 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO-9322055 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO-9322058 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO-9322421 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO-9416332 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO-9423738 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO-9424314 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO-9426766 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-9800705 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO-9511922 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO-9519922 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO-9524929 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO-9533447 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO-9634112 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO-9638730 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO-9640062 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO-9640723 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO-9700125 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO-9700442 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO-9704297 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO-9704748 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO-9723140 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO-9728556 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO-9739814 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO-9740141 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO-9745644 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO-9747763 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO-9800231 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO-9802237 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO-9810267 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO-9813502 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO-9823733 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO-9831700 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO-9833001 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO-9834120 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-9837186 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-9841869 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO-9852691 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO-9858085 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-9902671 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO-9922858 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO-9928020 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-9931019 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-0004139 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO-9954730 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO-9961888 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO-0047322 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-0052455 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-0040712 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO-0061275 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO-0070080 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO-0076673 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO-0112327 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-0114589 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0118244 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0164332 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0168257 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0169289 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0172431 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO-0180283 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO-0218949 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-0222859 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-0222869 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-0223163 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO-0231203 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO-0247665 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO-02047665 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02060275 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02078845 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO-02103011 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO-02103353 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO-03011443 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO-03037302 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO-03044187 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO-03078659 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-03099843 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004002627 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004018497 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004024917 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004038363 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004069849 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004074504 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004083443 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004086314 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004087308 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004091763 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004102204 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004103565 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005000970 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005002730 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005021151 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005103106 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005118138 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006002641 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006009657 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006027757 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006038035 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006040551 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006040554 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006078841 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006096571 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006101851 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007021343 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007030501 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007081385 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007081387 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007089541 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007114794 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007123744 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007133710 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007138178 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008021123 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008063227 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008097559 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008121342 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008130523 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2009029229 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010056728 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010040006 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010151776 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011042564 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011079176 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kiss et al., Anal. Chem. 2008, vol. 80, p. 8975-8981. |
| Adang, A.E. et al., The contribution of combinatiorial chemistry to lead generation: an interim analysis, Curr Med Chem 8: 985-998 (2001). |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845, mailed Jun. 14, 2010. |
| Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/698,298, mailed May 20, 2011. |
| Affholter and F. Arnold, Engineering a Revolution, Chemistry in Britian, Apr. 1999, p. 48. |
| Agrawal and Tang, Site specific functionalization of oligodeoxynucleotides for non-radioactive labelling, Tetrahedron Letters 31:1543-1546 (1990). |
| Aharoni et al., High-Throughput screens and selections of enzyme-encoding genes, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 9(2):210-6 (2005). |
| Ahn et al., Dielectrophoretic manipulation of drops for high-speed microluidic sorting devices, Applied Phys Lett 88, 024104 (2006). |
| Allen et al., High throughput fluorescence polarization: a homogeneous alternative to radioligand binding for cell surface receptors J Biomol Screen, 5(2):63-9 (2000). |
| Altman et al., Solid-state laser using a rhodamine-doped silica gel compound, IEEE Photonics technology letters 3(3):189-190 (1991). |
| Amstutz, P. et al., In vitro display technologies: novel developments and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 12, 400-405 (2001). |
| Anabaev et al., Klenow fragment and DNA polymerase alpha-primase fromserva calf thymus in water-in-oil microemulsions, Biochim Biophy Acta 1384:315-324 (1998). |
| Anderson et al., Preparation of a cell-free protein-synthesizing system from wheat germ, Methods Enzymol 101:635-44 (1983). |
| Anderson, J.E., Restriction endonucleases and modification methylases, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol., 3:24-30 (1993). |
| Ando, S. et al., PLGA microspheres containing plasmid DNA: preservation of supercoiled DNA via cryopreparation and carbohydrate stabilization, J Pharm Sci, 88(1):126-130 (1999). |
| Angell et al., Silicon micromechanical devices, Scientific American 248:44-55 (1983). |
| Anhuf et al., Determination of SMN1 and SMN2 copy number using TaqMan technology, Hum Mutat 22(1):74-78 (2003). |
| Anna et al., Formation of dispersions using flow focusing in microchannels, Applied Physics Letters,82(3):364-366 (2003). |
| Arkin, M.R. et al., Probing the importance of second sphere residues in an esterolytic antibody by phage display, J Mol Biol 284(4):1083-94 (1998). |
| Armstrong et al., Multiple-Component Condensation Strategies for Combinatorial Library Synthesis, Acc. Chem. Res. 29(3):123-131 (1996). |
| Ashkin and Dziedzic, Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria, Science 235(4795):1517-20 (1987). |
| Ashkin et al., Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams, Nature 330:769-771 (1987). |
| Atwell, S. & Wells, J.A., Selection for Improved Subtiligases by Phage Display, PNAS 96: 9497-9502(1999). |
| Auroux, Pierre-Alain et al., Micro Total Analysis Systems. 2. Analytical Standard Operations and Applications, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74, No. 12, 2002, pp. 2637-2652. |
| Baccarani et al., Escherichia colidihydrofolate reductase: Isolation and characterization of IWO isozymes, Biochemistry 16(16):3566-72 (1977). |
| Baez et al., Glutathione transferases catalyse the detoxication of oxidized metabolites (o-quinones) of catecholamines and may serve as an antioxidant system preventing degenerative cellular processes, Biochem. J 324:25-28 (1997). |
| Baker. M., Clever PCR: more genotyping, smaller volumes, Nature Methods 7:351-356 (2010). |
| Bail and Schwartz, CMATRIX: software for physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling using a symbolic matrix representation system, Comput Biol Med 24(4):269-76 (1994). |
| Ballantyne and Nixon, Selective Area Metallization by Electron-Beam Controlled Direct Metallic Deposition, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10:1094 (1973). |
| Barany F., The ligase chain reaction in a PCR World, PCR Methods and Applications 1(1):5-16 (1991). |
| Barany, F. Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase, PNAS 88(1):189-93 (1991). |
| Baret et al., Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity, Lab on a Chip 9:1850-1858 (2009). |
| Baret et al., Kinetic aspects of emulsion stabilization by surfactants: a microfluidic analysis, Langmuir 25:6088-6093 (2009). |
| Bass et al., Hormone Phage: An Enrichment Method for Variant Proteins With Altered Binding Properties, Proteins 8:309-314(1990). |
| Bauer, J., Advances in cell separation: recent developments in counterflow centrifugal elutriation and continuous flow cell separation, J Chromotography, 722:55-69 (1999). |
| Beebe et al., Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels, Nature 404:588-590 (2000). |
| Beer et al., On Chip, Real-Time, Single-Copy Polymerase Chain Reaction in Picoliter Droplets, Anal. Chem., 2007, vol. 79, pp. 847-8475. |
| Bein, Thomas, Efficient Assays for Combinatorial methods for the Discovery of Catalysts, Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38:3, 323-26 (1999). |
| Benichou et al., Double Emulsions Stabilized by New Molecular Recognition Hybrids of Natural Polymers, Polym. Adv. Technol 13:1019-1031 (2002). |
| Benner, S.A., Expanding the genetic lexicon: incorporating non-standard amino acids into proteins by ribosome-based synthesis, Trends Biotechnol 12:158-63 (1994). |
| Benning, M.M. et al., The binding of substrate analogs to phosphotriesterase. J Biol Chem, 275, 30556-30560 (2000). |
| Berman et al., An agarose gel electrophoresis assat for the detection of DNA-binding activities in yeast cell extracts, Methods Enzymol 155:528-37 (1987). |
| Bernath et al., In Vitro Compartmentalization by Double Emulsions: Sorting and Gene Enrichment by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting, Anal. Biochem 325:151-157 (2004). |
| Bernath et al., Directed evolution of protein inhibitors of DNA-nucleases by in vitro compartmentalization (IVC) and nano-droplet delivery, J. Mol. Biol 345(5):1015-26 (2005). |
| Betlach, L. et al., A restriction endonuclease analysis of the bacterial plasmid controlling the EcoRl restriction and modification of DNA. Federation Proceedings, 35, 2037-2043 (1976). |
| Bibette et al., Emulsions: basic principles, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52:969-1033 (1999). |
| Bico, Jose et al., Rise of Liquids and Bubbles in Angular Capillary Tubes, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 247, 2002, pp. 162-166. |
| Bico, Jose et al., Self-Propelling Slugs, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 467, 2002, pp. 101-127. |
| Blattner and Dahlberg, RNA synthesis startpoints in bacteriophage lambda: are the promoter and operator transcribed?, Nature New Biol 237(77):227-32 (1972). |
| Boder et al., Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries, Nat Biotechnol 15(6):553-7 (1997). |
| Bougueleret, L. et al., Characterization of the gene coding for the EcoRV restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res, 12(8):3659-76 (1984). |
| Boyum, A., Separation of leukocytes from blood and bone marrow, Introduction, Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 97:7 (1968). |
| Branebjerg et al., Fast mixing by lamination, MEMS Proceedings 9th Ann WO rkshop, San Diego, Feb. 11-15, 1996, 9:441-446 (1996). |
| Braslavsky et al., Sequence information can be obtained from single DNA molecules, PNAS 100(7):3960-3964 (2003). |
| Bringer et al., Microfluidic Systems for Chemical Kinetics That Rely on Chaotic Mixing in Droplets, Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 362:1-18 (2004). |
| Brody et al., A self-assembled microlensing rotational probe, Applied Physics Letters, 74:144-46 (1999). |
| Brown et al., Chemical synthesis and cloning of a tyrosine IRNA gene, Methods Enzymol 68:109-151 (1979). |
| Bru, R. et al., Catalytic activity of elastase in reverse micelles, Biochem Mol Bio Int. 31(4):695-92 (1993). |
| Bru, R. et al., Product inhibition of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles, Eur J Biochem 199(1):95-103 (1991). |
| Brummelkamp et al., A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells, Science 296(5567):550-3 (2002). |
| Buckpitt et al., Heptic and pulmonary microsomal metabolism of naphthalene to glutathione adducts: factors affecting the relative rates of conjugate formation, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 231:291-300 (1984). |
| Buican et al., Automated single-cell manipulation and sorting by light trapping, Applied Optics 26(24):5311-5316 (1987). |
| Burbaum, J., Miniaturization technologies in HTS: how fast, how small, how soon? Drug Discov Today 3:313-322 (1998). |
| Burns et al., Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. May 1996, vol. 93, pp. 5556-5561. |
| Burns, J.R. et al., The Intensification of Rapid Reactions in Multiphase Systems Using Slug Flow in Capillaries, Lab on a Chip, vol. 1, 2001 pp. 10-15. |
| Burns, Mark et al., An Integrated Nanoliter DNA Analysis Device, Science, vol. 282, 1998, pp. 484-487. |
| Byrnes, P.J. et al., Sensitive fluorogenic substrates for the detection of trypsin-like proteases and pancreatic elastase, Anal Biochem, 126:447 (1982). |
| Cahill et al., Polymerase chain reaction and Q beta replicase amplification, Clin Chem 37(9):1482-5 (1991). |
| Caldwell, S.R. et al., Limits of diffusion in the hydrolysis of substrates by the phosphodiesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta, Biochemistry, 30:7438-7444 (1991). |
| Calvert, P., Inkjet printing for materials and devices, Chem Mater 13:3299-3305 (2001). |
| Caruthers, Gene synthesis machines: DNA chemistry and its uses, Science 230:281-285 (1985). |
| Chakrabarti, A.C. et al., Production of RNA by a polymerase protein encapsulated within phospholipid vesicles, J Mol Evol, 39(6):555-9 (1994). |
| Chamberlain and Ring, Characterization of T7-specific ribonucleic acid polymerase. 1. General properties of the enzymatic reaction and the template specificity of the emzyme, J Biol Chem 248:2235-44 (1973). |
| Chan, Emory M. et al., Size-Controlled Growth of CdSe Nanocrystals in Microfluidic Reactors, Nano Letters, vol. 3, No. 2, 2003, pp. 199-201. |
| Chang and Su, Controlled double emulsilfication utilizing 3D PDMS microchannels, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 18:1-8 (2008). |
| Chang, T.M., Recycling of NAD(P) by multienzyme systems immobilized by microencapsulation in artifical cells, Methods Enzymol, 136(67):67-82 (1987). |
| Chao et al., Control of Concentration and Volume Gradients in Microfluidic Droplet Arrays for Protein Crystallization Screening, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Francisco, California Sep. 1-5, (2004). |
| Chao et al., Droplet Arrays in Microfluidic Channels for Combinatiorial Screening Arrays, Hilton Head 2004: A Solid State Senson, Actuator and Microsystems Workshop, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, Jun. 6-10, (2004). |
| Chapman et al., In vitro selection of catalytic RNAs, Curr. op. Struct. Biol., 4:618-22 (1994). |
| Chayen, Crystallization with oils: a new dimension in macromolecular crystal growth Journal of Crystal Growth 196 (1999), pp. 434-441. |
| Chen et al., Capturing a Photoexcited Molecular Structure Through Time-Domain X-ray Absorption Fine Structure, Science 292(5515):262-264 (2001). |
| Chen et al., Microfluidic Switch for Embryo and Cell Sorting The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems, Boston, MA Jun. 8-12, 2003 Transducers, 1:659-662 (2003). |
| Chen-Goodspeed, et al., Structural Determinants of the substrate and stereochemical specificity of phosphotriesterase, Biochemistry, 40(5):1325-31 (2001). |
| Chen-Goodspeed, M. et al., Enhancement, relaxation, and reversal of the stereoselectivity for phosphotriesterase by rational evolution of active site residues, Biochemistry, 40:1332-1339 (2001b). |
| Cheng, Z., et al., Electro flow focusing inmicrofluidic devices, Microfluidics Poster, presented at DBAS. Frontiers in Nanoscience, presented Apr. 10, 2003. |
| Chelverin and Spirin, Replicable RNA vectors: prospects for cell-free gene amplification, expression, and cloning, Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol, 51:225-70 (1995). |
| Chiang, C.M. et al., Expression and purification of general transcription factors by FLAG epitope-tagging and peptide elution, Pepl Res, 6:62-64 (1993). |
| Chiba et al., Controlled protein delivery from biodegradable tyrosino-containing poly(anhydride-co-imide) microspheres, Biomaterials, 18(13):893-901 (1997). |
| Chiou et al., A closed-cytce capillary polymerase chain reaction machine, Analytical Chemistry, Americal Chemical Socitey, 73:2018-21 (2001). |
| Chiu et al., Chemical transformations in individual ultrasmall biomimetic containers, Science, 283:1892-1895 (1999). |
| Chou et al., A microfabricated device for sizing and sorting DNA molecules 96:11-13(1998). |
| Clackson, T. et al., in vitro selection from protein and peptide libraries, Trends Biotechnol, 12:173-84 (1994). |
| Clausell-Tormos et al., Droplet-based microfluidic platforms for the encapsulation and screening of Mammalian cells and multicellular organisms, Chem Biol 15(5):427-437 (2008). |
| Cohen, S. et al., Controlled delivery systems for proteins based on poly(lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres, Pharm Res. 8(6):713-720 (1991). |
| Collins et al., Optimization of Sheer Driven Droplet Generation in a Microfluidic Device, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo, Washington (2003). |
| Collins, J. et al., Microfluidic flow transducer based on the measurements of electrical admittance, Lab on a Chip, 4:7-10 (2004). |
| Compton, J., Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature, 350(6313):91-2 (1991). |
| Cormack, B.P. et al., FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP), Gene 173(1):33-38 (1996). |
| Cortesi et al., Production of lipospheres as carriers for bioactive compounds, Biomaterials, 23(11):2283-2294 (2002). |
| Courrier et al., Reverse water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions and microemulsions obtained with a ?uorinated surfactant, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochem. Eng. Aspects 244:141-148 (2004). |
| Craig, D. et al., Fluorescence-based enzymatic assay by capillary electrophoresis laser-induced fluoresence detection for the determination of a few alpha-galactosidase molecules, Anal. Biochem. 226:147 (1995). |
| Creagh, A.L. et al., Structural and catalytic properties of enzymes in reverse micelles, Enzyme Microb Technol 15(5):383-92 (1993). |
| Crosland-Taylor, A Device for Counting Small Particles suspended in a Fluid through a Tube, Nature 171:37-38 (1953). |
| Crowley, J.M., Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability, Biophys J. 13(7):711-724 (1973). |
| Cull, M.G. et al., Screening for receptor ligands using large libraries of peptides linked to the C terminus of the lac repressor, PNAS 89:1865-9 (1992). |
| Curran, D.P., Strategy-level separations in organic synthesis: from planning to practice. Angew Chem Int Ed, 37:1174-11-96 (1998). |
| Czarnik, A.W., Encoding methods for combinatorial chemistry, Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:60-66 (1997). |
| Dankwardt et al., Combinatorial synthesis of small-molecule libraries using 3-amino-5-hydroxybenzoic acid, 1:113-120 (1995). |
| Davis, J.A. et al., Deterministic hydrodynamics: Taking blood apart, PNAS 103:14779-14784 (2006). |
| Davis, S.S. et al., Multiple emulsions as targetable delivery systems, Methods in Enzymology, 149:51-64 (1987). |
| de Gans, B.J. et al., Inkjet printing of polymers: state of the art and future developments, Advanced materials, 16:203-213 (2004). |
| De-Bashan, L.E. et al., Removal of ammonium and phosphorus ions from synthetic wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris coimmobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense, Water Research 36 (2002).pp. 2941-2948. |
| Delagrave, S. et al., Red-shifted excitation mutants of the green fluorescent protein, Biotechnology 13(2):151-4 (1995). |
| DelRaso, In vitro methodologies for enhanced toxicity testing, Toxicol. Lett. 68:91-99 (1993). |
| Demartis et al., A strategy for the isolation of catalytic activities from repertoires of enzymes displayed on phage, J. Mol. Biol 286:617-633 (1999). |
| Dickinson, E., Emulsions and droplet size control, Wedlock, D.J., Ed., in Controlled Particle Droplet and Bubble Formulation, ButlerWO rth-Heine-mann, 191-257 (1994). |
| DiMatteo, et al., Genetic conversion of an SMN2 gene to SMN1: A novel approach to the treatment of spinal muscular muscular atrophy. Exp Cell Res. 314(4):878-886 (2008). |
| Dinsmore et al., Colicidosomes: Selectively Permeable Capsules Composed of Colloidal Particles, Science 298(5595):1006-1009 (2002). |
| Dittrich et al., A new embedded process for compartmentalized cell-free protein expression and on-line detection in microfluidic devices, Chembiochem 6(5):811-814 (2005). |
| Doi et al., In vitro selection of restriction endonucleases by in vitro compartmentilization, Nucleic Acids Res. 32(12):e95 (2004). |
| Doi, N. and Yanagawa, H. STABLE: protein-DNA fusion system for screening of combinatorial protein libraries in vitro, FEBS Lett., 457:227-230 (1999). |
| Doman, T.N. et al., Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B, J Med Chem, 45:2213-2221 (2002). |
| Domling A., Recent advances in isocyanide-based multicomponent chemistry, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 6(3):306-13 (2002). |
| Domling and Ugi, Multicomponent Reactions with Isocyanides, Angew Chem Int Ed 39(18):3168-3210 (2000). |
| Dove et al., In Brief, Nature Biotechnology 20:1213 (2002). |
| Dower et al., High efficieny transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation, Nucleic Acids Res 16:6127-6145 (1988). |
| Dressman et al., Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations, PNAS 100:8817-22 (2003). |
| Dreyfus et al., Ordered and disordered patterns in two phase flows in microchannels, Phys Rev Lett 90(14):144505-1-144505-4 (2003). |
| Drmanac et al., Sequencing by hybridization: towards an automated sequencing of one million M13 clones arrayed on membranes, Electrophoresis 13:566-573 (1992). |
| Dubertret et al., in vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipid micelles, Science, 298:1759-1762 (2002). |
| Duffy et al., Rapid Protyping of Microfluidic Systems and Polydimethylsiloxane, Anal Chem 70:474-480 (1998). |
| Duggleby, R. G. Enzyme Kinetics and Mechanisms, Pt D. Academic Press 249:61-90 (1995). |
| Dumas, D.P., Purification and properties of the phosphotriesterase from Psuedomonas diminuta, J Biol Chem 264: 19659-19665 (1989). |
| Eckert and Kunkel, DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction, Genome Res 1:17-24 (1991). |
| Edd et al., Controlled encapsulation of single-cells into monodisperse picolitre drops, Lab Chip 8(8):1262-1264 (2008). |
| Edel, Joshua B. et al., Microfluidic Routes to the Controlled Production of Nanopaticles, Chemical Communications, 1136-1137 (2002). |
| Edris et al., Encapsulation of orange oil in a spray dried double emulsion, Nahrung/Food, 45(2):133-137 (2001). |
| Effenhauser et al., Glass chips for high-speed capillary electrophoresis separations with submicrometer plate heights, Anal Chem 65:2637-2642 (1993). |
| Eggers, Jens et al., Coalescence of Liquid Drops, J. Fluid Mech.,401: 293-310 (1999). |
| Ehrig, T. et al., Green-fluorescent protein mutants with altered fluorescence excitation spectra, Febs Lett, 367(2):163-66 (1995). |
| Eigen et al., hypercycles and compartments: compartments assists—but does not replace—hypercyclic organization of early genetic information, J Theor Biol, 85:407-11 (1980). |
| Eigen et al., The hypercycle: coupling of RNA and protein biosynthesis in the infection cycle of an RNA bacteriophage, Biochemistry, 30:11005-18 (1991). |
| Eigen, Wie entsteht information? Prinzipien der selbstorganisation in der biologie, Berichte der punsen-gesellschaft fur physikalische chemi, 80:1059-81 (1976). |
| Ellington and Szostak, In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands, Nature, 346:818-822 (1990). |
| Ellman et al., Biosynthetic method for introducing unnatural amino acids site-specifically into proteins, Methods Enzymol, 202:301-36 (1991). |
| Endo et al., Kinetic determination of trace cobalt by visual autocatalytic indication, Talanta 47:349-353 (1998). |
| Endo et al., Autocatalytic decomposition of cobalt complexes as an indicator system for the determination of trace amounts of cobalt and effectors, Analyst 121:391-394 (1996). |
| Eow et al., Electrocoalesce-separators for the separation of aqueous drops from a flowing dielectric viscous liquid, Separation and Purification Tech 29:63-77 (2002). |
| Eow et al., Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: a review of the technology, Chemical Engineeing Journal 85:357-368 (2002). |
| Eow et al., Motion, deformation and break-up of aqueous drops in oils under high electric field strengths, Chemical Eng Proc 42:259-272 (2003). |
| Eow et al., The behavior of a liquid-liquid interface and drop-interface coalescence under the influence of an electric field, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochern. Eng. Aspects 215:101-123 (2003). |
| Eow, et al. Electrostatic and hydrodynamic separation of aqueous drops in a flowing viscous oil, Chemical Eng Proc 41:649-657 (2002). |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 10181911.8 mailed Jun. 1, 2011 (7 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 10184514.7 mailed Dec. 20, 2010 (5 pages). |
| Faca et al., A mouse to human search for plasma proteome changes associated with pancreatic tumor development, PLoS Med 5(6):el23 (2008). |
| Fahy et al., Self-sustained sequence replication (3SR): an isothermal transcription-based amplification system alternative to PCR, PCR Methods Appl 1:25-33 (1991). |
| Fan and Harrison, Micromachining of capillary electrophoresis injectors and separators on glass chip and evaluation of flow at capillary intersections, Anal Chem 66:177-184 (1994). |
| Fastrez, J., In vivo versus in vitro screening or selection for catalytic activity in enzymes and abzymes, Mol Biotechnol 7(1):37-55 (1997). |
| Fettinger et al., Stacked modules for micro flow systems in chemical analysis: concept and studies using an enlarged model, Sens Actuat B. 17:19-25 (1993). |
| Fiedler et al., Dielectrophoretic sorting of particles and cells in a microsystem, Anal Chem 70(9):1909-1915 (1998). |
| Field, J. et al., Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cervisiae by use of an epitope addition method. Mol Cell Biol, 8: 2159-2165 (1988). |
| Fields, S. and Song, O., A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions, Nature 340(6230): 245-6 (1989). |
| Filella et al., TAG-72, CA 19.9 and CEA as tumor markers in gastric cancer, Acta Oncol. 33(7):747-751 (1994). |
| Finch, C.A., Encapsulation and controlled release, Spec Publ R Soc Chem, 138:35 (1993). |
| Finch, C.A., Industrial Microencapsulation: Polymers for Microcapsule Walls, 1-12 in Encapsulation and Controlled Release, Woodhead Publishing (1993). |
| Fire & Xu, Rolling replication of short DNA circles, PNAS 92(10):4641-5 (1995). |
| Firestine, S.M. et al., Using an AraC-based three hybrid system to detect biocatalysts in vivo, Nat Biotechnol 18: 544-547 (2000). |
| Fisch et al., A strategy of exon shuffling for making large peptide repertoires displayed on filamentous bacteriophage, PNAS 93:7761-6 (1996). |
| Fisher et al., Cell Encapsulation on a Microfluidic Platform, The Eighth International Conference on Miniaturised Systems for Chemistry and Life Scieces, MicroTAS 2004, Sep. 26-30, Malmo, Sweden. |
| Fletcher et al., Micro reactors: principles and applications in organic synthesis, Tetrahedron 58:4735-4757 (2002). |
| Fluri et al., Integrated capillary electrophoresis devices with an efficient postcolumn reactor in planar quartz and glass chips, Anal Chem 68:4285-4290 (1996). |
| Fornusek, L. et al., Polymeric microspheres as diagnostic tools for cell surface marker tracing, Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 2:137-74 (1986). |
| Fowler, Enhancement of Mixing by Droplet-Based Microfluidics, Int Conf MEMS 97-100 (2002). |
| Freese, E., The specific mutagenic effect of base analogues on Phage T4, J Mol Biol, 1:87 (1959). |
| Frenz et al., Reliable microfluidic on-chip incubation of droplets in delay-lines, Lab on a Chip 9:1344-1348 (2008). |
| Fu et al., A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter, Nature Biotechnology, 17(11):1109-1111 (1999). |
| Fu et al., An Integrated Microfabricated Cell Sorter, Anal. Chem., 74: 2451-2457 (2002). |
| Fulton et al., Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system, Clin Chem 43:1749-1756 (1997). |
| Fulwyler, Electronic Separation of Biological Cells by Volume, Science 150(3698):910-911 (1965). |
| Gallarate et al., On the stability of ascorbic acid in emulsified systems for topical and cosmetic use, Int J Pharm 188(2):233-241 (1999). |
| Ganan-Calvo, A.M., Perfectly Monodisperse Microbubbling by Capillary Flow Focusing, Phys Rev Lett 87(27): 274501-1-4 (2001). |
| Ganan-Calvo, Generation of Steady Liquid Microthreads and Micron-Sized Monodisperse Sprays and Gas Streams, Phys Rev Lett 80(2):285-288 (1998). |
| Garcia-Ruiz et al., A super-saturation wave of protein crystallization, J. Crystal Growth, 232:149-155(2001). |
| Garcia-Ruiz et al., Investigation on protein crystal growth by the gel acupuncture method, Acta, Cryst., 1994, D50, 99. pp. 484-490. |
| Garstecki, et al., Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfiuidic flow-focusing device, Appl Phys Lett 85(13):2649-2651 (2004). |
| Gasperlin et al., The structure elucidation of semisolid w/o emulsion systems containing silicone surfactant, Intl J Pharm, 107:51-6 (1994). |
| Gasperlin et al., Viscosity prediction of lipophillic semisolid emulsion systems by neural network modeling, Intl J Pharm, 196:37-50 (2000). |
| Georgiou et al., Display of heterologous proteins on the surface of microorganisms: from the screenign of combinatiorial libraires to live recombinant vaccines. Nat Biotechnol 15(1), 29-34 (1997). |
| Georgiou, G., Analysis of large libraries of protein mutants using flow cytometry, Adv Protein Chem, 55: 293-315 (2000). |
| Gerdts et al., A Synthetic Reaction NetWork: Chemical Amplification Using Nonequilibrium Autocatalytic Reactions Coupled in Time, J. Am. Chem. Soc 126:6327-6331 (2004). |
| Ghadessy et al., Directed Evolution of Polymerase Function by Compartmentalized Self-Replication, PNSAS 98(8): 4552-4557 (2001). |
| Gibbs et al., Detection of single DNA base differences by competitive oligonucleotide priming, Nucleic Acids Res. 17(7): 2437-48 (1989). |
| Gilliland, G., Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNA: Detection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction, PNAS, 87(7):2725-9 (1990). |
| Giusti et al., Synthesis and characterization of 5′ fluorescent dye labeled oligonucleotides, Genome Res 2:223-227 (1993). |
| Gold et al., Diversity of Oligonucleotide Functions Annu Rev Biochem, 64: 763-97 (1995). |
| Goodall, J. L. et al., Operation of Mixed-Culture Immobilized Cell Reactors for the Metabolism of Meta- and Para-Nitrobenzoate by Comamonas Sp. JS46 and Comamonas Sp. JS47, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 59 (1): 21-27 (1998). |
| Gordon and Balasubramanian, Solid phase synthesis—designer linkers for combinatorial chemistry: a review, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 74(9):835-851 (1999). |
| Grasland-Mongrain et al., Droplet coalescence in microfluidic devices, 30 pages (Jul. 2003) From internet: http://www.eleves.ens.fr/home/grasland/rapports/stage4.pdf. |
| Green, R. and Szostak, J.W., Selection of a Ribozyme That Functions as a Superior Template in a Self Copying Reaction, Science, 258: 1910-5 (1992). |
| Gregoriadis, G., Enzyme entrapment in liposomes, Methods Enzymol 44:218-227 (1976). |
| Griffiths et al., Directed evolution of an extremely fast phosphotriesterase by in vitro compartmentalization, EMBO J, 22:24-35 (2003). |
| Griffiths et al., Isolation of high affinity human antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires, Embo J 13(14):3245-60 (1994). |
| Griffiths et al., Man-made enzymes-from design to in vitro compartmentalisation, Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:338-353 (2000). |
| Griffiths, A., and Tawfik, D., Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets, Trend Biotech 24(9):395-402 (2006). |
| Griffiths, A.D. et al., Strategies for selection of antibodies by phage display, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 9:102-8 (1998). |
| Guatelli, J.C. et al., Isothermal, in vitro amplification of nucleic acids by a multienzyme reaction modeled after retroviral replication, PNAS, 87(5):1874-8 (1990). |
| Guixe et al., Ligand-Induced Conformational Transitions in Escherichia coli Phosphofructokinase 2: Evidence for an Allosteric Site for MgATP2n, Biochem., 37: 13269-12375 (1998). |
| Gupta, K.C., et al., A general method for the synthesis of 3′-sulfhydryl and phosphate group containing oligonucleotides, Nucl Acids Res 19 (11): 3019-3026 (1991). |
| Haber et al., Activity and spectroscopic properties of bovine liver catalase in sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate/isooctane reverse micelles, Eur J Biochem 217(2): 567-73 (1993). |
| Habig and Jakoby, Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases, Methods in Enzymology, 77: 398-405 (1981). |
| Hadd et al., Microchip Device for Performing Enzyme Assays, Anal. Chem 69(17): 3407-3412 (1997). |
| Haddad et al., A methodology for solving physiologically based pharmacokinetic models without the use of simulation software, Toxicol Lett. 85(2): 113-26 (1996). |
| Hagar and Spitzer, The effect of endotoxemia on concanavalin A induced alterations in cytoplasmic free calcium in rat spleen cells as determined with Fluo-3, Cell Calcium 13:123-130 (1992). |
| Hai et al., Investigation on the release of fluorescent markers from the w/o/w emulsions by fluorescence-activated cell sorter, J Control Release, 96(3): 393-402 (2004). |
| Haies et al., Morphometric study of rat lung cells. I. Numerical and dimensional characteristics of parenchymal cell population, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 123:533-54 (1981). |
| Hall, Experimental evolution of Ebg enzyme provides clues about the evolution of catalysis and to evolutionary potential, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 174(1):1-8 (1999). |
| Hall, The EBG system of E. coli: origin and evolution of a novel beta-galactosidase for the metabolism of lactose, Genetica 118(2-3):143-56 (2003). |
| Han et al., Quantum-dot-tagged Microbeads for Multiplexed Optical Coding of Biomolecules, Nat Biotech 19(7): 631-635 (2001). |
| Handen, J.S., High-throughput screening—challenges for the future, Drug Discov World, 47-50 (2002). |
| Handique, K. et al., On-Chip Thermopneumatic Pressure for Discrete Drop Pumping, Analytical Chemistry, 73:1831-1838 (2001). |
| Hanes et al., Degradation of porous poly(anhydide-co-imide) microspheres and implication for controlled macromolecule delivery, Biomaterials, 19(1-3): 163-172(1998). |
| Hanes et al., In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display, PNAS 94:4937-42 (1997). |
| Hansen et al., A robust and scalable microfluidic metering method that allows protein crystal growth by free interface diffusion, PNAS 99(26):16531-16536 (2002). |
| Harada et al., Monoclonal antibody G6K12 specific for membrane-associated differentiation marker of human stratified squamous epithelia and squamous cell carcinoma, J. Oral Pathol. Med 22(4):145-152 (1993). |
| Harder, K.W. et al., Characterization and kinetic analysis of the intracellular domain of human protein tyrosine phosphatase beta (HPTP beta) using synthetic phosphopeptides, Biochem J 298 (Pt 2): 395-401 (1994). |
| Harries et al., A Numerical Model for Segmented Flow in a Microreactor, Int J of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46:3313-3322 (2006). |
| Harris et al., Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome, Science 320(5872):106-109 (2008). |
| Harrison et al., Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis-based chemical analysis system on a chip, Science 261(5123):895-897 (1993). |
| Hasina et al., Plasminogen activator inhibitor-2: a molecular biomarker for head and neck cancer progression, Cancer Research 63:555-559 (2003). |
| Haynes Principles of Digital PCR and Measurement Issue Oct. 15, 2012. |
| Hayward et al., Dewetting Instability during the Formation of Polymersomes from BloceCopolymer-Stabilized Double Emulsions, Langmuir, 22(10): 4457-4461 (2006). |
| He et al., Selective encapsulation of single cells and subcellular organelles into picoliter- and femtoliter-volume droplets, Anal Chem 77(6):1539-1544 (2005). |
| Heim et al., Engineering Green Fluorescent Protein for Improved Brightness, Longer Wavelengths and Fluorescence Response Energy Transfer, Carr. Biol, 6(2): 178-182 (1996). |
| Hellman et al., Differential tissue-specific protein markers of vaginal carcinoma, Br J Cancer, 100(8): 1303-131 (2009). |
| Hergenrother et al., Small-Molecule Microarrays: Covalent Attachment and Screening of Alcohol-Containing Small Molecules on Glass Slides, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 122: 7849-7850 (2000). |
| Hildebrand et al., Liquid-Liquid Solubility of Perfluoromethylcyclohexane with Benzene, Carbon Tetrachloride, Chlorobenzene, Chloroform and Toluene, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 71:22-25 (1949). |
| Hjelmfelt et al., Pattern-Recognition in Coupled Chemical Kinetic Systems, Science, 260(5106):335-337 (1993). |
| Ho, S.N. et al., Site-directed mutageneiss by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction, Gene, 77(1):51-9 (1989). |
| Hoang, Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: mathematical fundamentals and simulation implementations, Toxicol Lett 79(1-3):99-106 (1995). |
| Hochuli et al., New metal chelate adsorbent selective for proteins and peptides containing neighbouring histidine residues, J Chromatogr 411: 177-84 (1987). |
| Holmes et al., Reagents for Combinatorial Organic Synthesis: Development of a New O-Nitrobenzyl Photolabile Linder for Solid Phase Synthesis, J. OrgChem., 60: 2318-2319(1995). |
| Hong, S.B. et al., Stereochemical constraints on the substrate specificity of phosphodiesterase, Biochemistry, 38: 1159-1165 (1999). |
| Hoogenboom et al., Multi-subunit proteins on the surface of filamentous phage: methodologies for displaying antibody (Fab) heavy and light chains, Nucl Acids Res., 91: 4133-4137 (1991). |
| Hoogenboom, H.R., Designing and optimizing library selection strategies for generating high-affinity antibodies, Trends Biotechnol, 15:62-70 (1997). |
| Hopfinger & Lasheras, Explosive Breakup of a Liquid Jet by a Swirling Coaxial Jet, Physics of Fluids 8(7):1696-1700 (1996). |
| Hopman et al., Rapid synthesis of biotin-, digoxigenin-, trinitrophenyl-, and fluorochrome-labeled tyramides and their application for In situ hybridization using CARD amplification, J of Histochem and Cytochem, 46(6):771-77 (1998). |
| Horton et al., Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension, Gene 77(1), 61-8 (1989). |
| Hosokawa, Kazuo et al., Handling of Picoliter Liquid Samples in a Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Microfluidic Device, Analytical Chemistry, 71(20):4781-4785 (1999). |
| Hsu et al., Comparison of process parameters for microencapsulation of plasmid DNA in poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres, J Drug Target, 7:313-23 (1999). |
| Huang L. R. et al., Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement, Science 304(5673):987-990 (2004). |
| Huang, Z. et al., A sensitive competitive ELISA for 2,4-dinitrophenol using 3,6-fluorescein diphosphate as a fluorogenic substrate, J Immunol Meth, 149:261 (1992). |
| Huang, Z.J., Kinetic assay of fluorescein mono-beta-D-galactosidase hydrolysis by beta-galactosidase: a front-face measurement for strongly absorbing fluorogenic substrates, Biochemistry, 30:8530-4 (1991). |
| Hubert et al. Data Concordance from a Comparison between Filter Binding and Fluorescence Polarization Assay Formats for Identification of RUOCK-II Inhibitors, J biomol Screen 8(4):399-409 (2003). |
| Huebner, A. et al., Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics, Chem Com 12:1218-1220 (2007). |
| Hung et al., Optimization of Droplet Generation by controlling PDMS Surface Hydrophobicity, 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congrees and RD&D Expo, Nov. 13-19, Anaheim, CA (2004). |
| Hung, et al., Controlled Droplet Fusion in Microfluidic Devices, MicroTAS 2004, Sep. 26-30, Malmo, Sweden (2004). |
| Hutchison et al., Cell-free cloning using Phi29 polymerase, PNAS 102(48):17332-17336 (2005). |
| Ibrahim, S.F. et al., High-speed cell sorting: fundamentals and recent advances, Curr Opin Biotchnol, 14(1):5-12 (2003). |
| Ikeda et al., Bioactivation of tegafur to 5-fluorouracil is catalyzed by cytochrome P-450 2A6 in human liver microsomes in vitro, Clin Cancer Res 6(11):4409-4415 (2000). |
| Inai et al., Immunohistochemical detection of an enamel protein-related epitope in rat bone at an early stage of osteogenesis, Histochemistry 99(5):335-362 (1993). |
| International Preliminary Report of Patentability for PCTUS2010061741 Mailed Sep. 16, 2011(4 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Sep. 20, 2007, for PCT/US2006/007772. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/050931 Mailed Nov. 26, 2009 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS1154353 Mailed Apr. 20, 2012 (34 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS12024745 Mailed May 11, 2012 (21 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS1224741 Mailed Jun. 12, 2012 (12 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCTUS125499 Mailed May 29, 2012 (10 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/EP2010/065188 Mailed Jan. 12, 2011 (7 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US11/24615 Mailed Jul. 25, 2011 (37 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2004/010903 Mailed Dec. 20, 2004 (16 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2006/021286 Mailed Sep. 14, 2007 (16 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2007/002063 Mailed Nov. 15, 2007 (20 pages). |
| International Search Report in PCT/US01/18400 Mailed Jan. 28, 2005 (37 pages). |
| Ismagilov, Integrated Microfluidic Systems, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 42:4130-4132 (2003). |
| Janda, et al., Chemical selection for catalysis in combinatorial antibody libraries, Science, 275:945-948 (1997). |
| Jang et al., Controllable delivery of non-viral DNA from porous scaffold, J Controlled Release 86(1):157-168 (2003). |
| Japanese Office Action for JP 2006-509830 mailed Jun. 1, 2011 (4 pages). |
| Jermutus et al., Recent advances in producing and selecting functional proteins by using cell-free translation, Curr Opin Biotechnol 9(5): 534-48 (1998). |
| Jestin et al., A Method for the Selection of Catalytic Activity Using Phage Display and Proximity Coupling, Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engi. 38(8):1124-1127 (1999). |
| Jo, et al., Encapsulation of Bovine Serum Albumin in Temperature-Programmed Shell-in-Shell Structures, Macromol. Rapid Comm 24:957-962 (2003). |
| Joerger et al., Analyte detection with DNA-labeled antibodies and polymerase chain reaction, Clin. Chem. 41(9):1371-7 (1995). |
| Johannsson et al., Amplification by Second Enzymes, In ELISA and Other Solid Phase Immunoassays, Kemeny et al (ed.), Chapter 4, pp. 85-106 John Wiley (1988). |
| Johannsson, A., Heterogeneous Enzyme Immunoassays, In Principles and Practice of Immunoassay, pp. 295-325 Stockton Press (1991). |
| Johnson, T.O. et al., Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors for diabetes, Nature Review Drug Discovery 1, 696-709 (2002). |
| Jones et al. Glowing jellyfish, luminescence and a molecule called coelenterazine, Trends Biotechnol. 17(12):477-81 (1999). |
| Jones, L.J. et al., Quenched BODIPY dye-labeled casein substrates for the assay of protease activity by direct fluorescence measurement, Anal Biochem, 251:144 (1997). |
| Joo et al., Laboratory evolution of peroxide-mediated cytochrome P450 hydroxylaion, Nature 399:670 (1999). |
| Joos et al., Covalent attachment of hybridizable oligonucleotides to glass supports, Analytical Biochemistry 247:96-101 (1997). |
| Joyce, G.F., In vitro Evolution of Nucleic Acids, Curr. Opp. Structural Biol, 4: 331-336 (1994). |
| Kadir and Moore, Haem binding to horse spleen ferritin, Febs Lett, 276: 81-4 (1990). |
| Kallen, R.G. et al., The mechanism of the condensation of formaldehyde with tetrahydrofolic acid, J. Biol. Chem., 241:5851-63 (1966). |
| Kambara et al., Optimization of Parameters in a DNA Sequenator Using Fluorescence Detection, Nature Biotechnology 6:816-821 (1988). |
| Kamensky et al., Spectrophotometer: new instrument for ultrarapid cell analysis, Science 150(3696):630-631 (1965). |
| Kanouni et al., Preparation of a stable double emulsion (W1/0/W2): role of the interfacial films on the stability of the system, Adv. Collid. Interf. Sci., 99(3): 229-254 (2002). |
| Katanaev et al., Viral Q beta RNA as a high expression vector for mRNA translation in a cell-free system, Febs Lett, 359:89-92 (1995). |
| Katsura et al., Indirect micromanipulation of single molecules in water-in-oil emulsion, Electrophoresis, 22:289-93 (2001). |
| Kawakatsu et al., Regular-sized cell creation in microchannel emulsification by visual microprocessing method, Journal of the American Oil ChemistS Society, 74:317-21 (1997). |
| Keana J. & Cai, S. X., New reagents for photoaffinity labeling: synthesis and photolysis of functionalized perfluorophenyl azides, J. Org. Chem.55(11):3640-3647 (1990). |
| Keefe, A.D. et al., Functional proteins from a random-sequence library, Nature, 410: 715-718 (2001). |
| Keij et al., High-Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using a Frequency-Doubled Argon Ion Laser, Cytometry, 19(3): 209-216 (1995). |
| Keij, J.F., et al., High-speed photodamage cell sorting: An evaluation of the ZAPPER prototype, Methods in cell biology, 42: 371-358 (1994). |
| Kelly et al., Miniaturizing chemistry and biology in microdroplets, Chem Commun 18:1773-1788 (2007). |
| Kerker, M., Elastic and inelastic light scattering in flow cytometry, Cytometry, 4:1-10 (1983). |
| Khandjian, UV crosslinking of RNA to nylon membrane enhances hybridization signals, Mol. Bio. Rep. 11: 107-115 (1986). |
| Kim et al., Comparative study on sustained release of human growth hormone from semi-crystalline poly(L-lactic acid) and amorphous poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: morphological effect on protein release, Journal of Controlled Release, 98(1):115-125 (2004). |
| Kim S. et al., Type II quantum dots: CdTe/CdSe (core/shell) and CdSe/ZnTe (core/shell) heterostructures, J. Am Chem Soc. 125:11466-11467 (2003). |
| Kircher et al., High-throughput DNA sequencing-concepts and limitations, Bioessays 32(6):524-536 (2010). |
| Kiss et al., High-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction in picoliter droplets, Anal. Chem 80:8975-8981 (2008). |
| Kitagawa et al., Manipulation of a single cell with microcapillary tubing based on its electrophoretic mobility, Electrophoresis 16:1364-1368 (1995). |
| Klug and Famulok, All you wanted to know about selex, Molecular Biology Reports, 20:97-107 (1994). |
| Klug and Schwabe, Protein motifs 5. Zinc fingers, FASEB J 9(8):597-604 (1995). |
| Klug, A., Gene Regulatory Proteins and Their Interaction with DNA, Ann NY Acad Sci, 758: 143-60 (1995). |
| Knaak et al., Development of partition coefficients, Vmax and Km values, and allometric relationships, Toxicol Lett. 79(I-3):87-98 (1995). |
| Knight, James B., Hydrodynamic Focusing on a Silicon Chip: Mixing Nanoliters in Microseconds, Physical Review Lett 80(17):3863-3866 (1998). |
| Kojima et al. PCR amplification from single DNA molecules on magnetic beads in emulsion: application for high-throughput screening of transcription factor targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e150 (2005). |
| Kolb et al., Cotranslational folding of proteins, Biochem Cell Biot, 73:1217-20 (1995). |
| Komatsu et al., Roles of cytochromes P450 1A2, 2A6, and 2C8 in 5-fluorouracil formation rom tegafur, an anticancer prodrug, in human liver microsomes. Drug Met. Disp., 28:1457-1463 (2001). |
| Kopp et al., Chemical amplification: continuous flow PCR on a chip, Science, 280:1046-48 (1998). |
| Koster et al., Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells, Lab on a Chip 8:1110-1115 (2008). |
| Kowalczykowski et al., Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli, Microbiol Rev 58(3):401-65 (1994). |
| Krafft et al., Emulsions and microemulsions with a fluorocarbon phase, Colloid and Interface Science 8(3):251-258 (2003). |
| Krafft et al., Synthesis and preliminary data on the biocompatibility and emulsifying properties of perfluoroalkylated phosphoramidates as injectable surfactants, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 26:545-550 (1991). |
| Kralj et al., Surfactant-enhanced liquid-liquid extraction in microfluidic channels with inline electric-field enhanced coalescence, Lab Chip 5:531-535 (2005). |
| Kricka and Wilding, Microchip PCR, Anal Bioanal Chem 377(5):820-825 (2003). |
| Kricka and Wilding, Micromachining: a new direction for clinical analyzers, Pure and Applied Chemistry 68(10):1831-1836 (1996). |
| Krumdiek, C.L. et al., Solid-phase synthesis of pteroylpolyglutamates, Methods Enzymol, 524-29 (1980). |
| Kumar, A. et al., Activity and kinetic characteristics of glutathione reductase in vitro in reverse micellar waterpool, Biochem Biophys Acta, 996(1-2):1-6 (1989). |
| Lage et al., Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH. Genome Res. 13: 294-307 (2003). |
| Lamprecht et al., pH-sensitive microsphere delivery increases oral bioavailability of calcitonin, Journal of Controlled Release, 98(1): 1-9(2004). |
| Lancet, D. et al., Probability model for molecular recognition in biuological receptor repertoirs: significance to the olfactory system, PNAS, 90(8):3715-9 (1993). |
| Landergren et al., A ligase mediated gene detection technique. Science 241(4869):1077-80 (1988). |
| Lasheras, et al., Breakup and Atomization of a Round Water Jet by a High Speed Annular Air Jet, J Fluid Mechanics 357:351-379 (1998). |
| Leary et al., Application of Advanced Cytometric and Molecular Technologies to Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring, Proceedings of SPIE 3913:36-44 (2000). |
| Lee et al., Investigating the target recognition of DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase Hhal by library selection using in vitro compartmentalisation (IVC), Nucleic Acids Res 30:4937-4944 (2002). |
| Lee et al., Circulating flows inside a drop under time-periodic non-uniform electric fields, Phys Fuilds 12(8):1899-1910 (2000). |
| Lee, et al., Effective Formation of Silicone-in-Fluorocarbon-in-Water Double Emulsions: Studies on Droplet Morphology and Stability, Journal of Dispersion Sci Tech 23(4):491-497(2002). |
| Lee, et al., Preparation of Silica Paticles Encapsulating Retinol Using O/W/O Multiple Emulsions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 240(1): 83-89 (2001). |
| Lemof, et al., An AC Magnetohydrodynamic Microfluidic Switch for Micro Total Analysis Systems, Biomedical Microdevices, 5(I):55-60 (2003). |
| Lesley et al., Use of in vitro protein synthesis from PCR-generated templates to study interaction of E coli transcription factors with core RNA polymerase, J Biol Chem 266(4):2632-8 (1991). |
| Lesley, S.A., Preparation and use of E. coli S-30 extracts, Methods Mol Biol, 37:265-78 (1995). |
| Leung et al., A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction. Technique 1:11-15 (1989). |
| Li and Harrison, Transport, Manipulation, and Reaction of Biological Cells On-Chip Using Electrokinetic Effects, Analytical Chemistry 69(8):1564-1568 (1997). |
| Li et al., Nanoliter microfluidic hybrid method for simultaneous screening and optimization validated with crystallization of membrane proteins, PNAS 103: 19243-19248 (2006). |
| Li et al., Single-step procedure for labeling DNA strand breaks with fllourescein-or BODIPY-conjugated deoxynucleotides: detection of apoptosis and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Cytometry 20:172-180 (1995). |
| Liao et al., Isolation of a thermostable enzyme variant by cloning and selection in a thermophile, PNAS 83:576-80 (1986). |
| Lim et al., Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas, Science 210(4472):908-10 (1980). |
| Link et al., Geometrically Mediated Breakup of Drops in Microfluidic Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(5): 054503-1 thru 054503-4 (2004). |
| Link et al., Electric control droplets in microfluidic devices, Angew Chem Int Ed 45:2556-2560 (2006). |
| Lipinski et al., Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings ,Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 46:3-26 (2001). |
| Lipkin et al., Biomarkers of increased susceptibility to gastreointestinal cancer: new application to studies of cancer prevention in human subjects, Cancer Research 48:235-245 (1988). |
| Liu et al., Fabrication and characterization of hydrogel-based microvalves, Mecoelectromech. Syst.11:45-53 (2002). |
| Liu et al., Passive Mixing in a Three-Dimensional Serpentine MicroChannel, J MEMS 9(2):190-197 (2000). |
| Lizardi et al., Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet 19(3):225-32 (1998). |
| Loakes and Brown, 5-Nitroindole as a universal base analogue. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4039-4043 (1994). |
| Loakes et al., Stability and structure of DNA oligonucleotides containing non-specific base analogues. J. Mol. Biol 270:426-435 (1997). |
| Loeker et al., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 214:143-150, (2003). |
| Lopez-Herrera, et al., Coaxial jets generated from electrified Taylor cones. Scaling laws, Aerosol Science, 34:535-552 (2003). |
| Lopez-Herrera, et al., One-Dimensional Simulation of the Breakup of Capillary Jets of Conducting Liquids Application to E.H.D. Spraying, Aerosol. Set, 30 (7): 895-912 (1999). |
| Lopez-Herrera, et al., The electrospraying of viscous and non-viscous semi-insulating liquids. Scalilng laws, Bulletin of the American Physical Society,40 (12):2041(1995). |
| Lorenceau et al., Generation of Polymerosomes from Double-Emulsions, Langmuir, 21(20): 9183-9186 (2005). |
| Lorenz et al., Isolation and expression of a cDNA encoding Renilla reniformis luciferase, PNAS 88(10):4438-42 (1991). |
| Loscertales, et al., Micro/Nano Encapsulation via Electrified Coaxial Liquid Jets, Science, 295(5560): 1695-1698 (2002). |
| Low N.M. et al., Mimicking somatic hypermutaion: affinity maturation of antibodies displayed on bacteriophage using a bacterila mutator strain. J Mol Biol 260(3), 359-68 (1996). |
| Lowe, K.C., Perfluorochemical respiratory gas carriers: benefits to cell culture systems, J Fluorine Chem 118:19-26 (2002). |
| Lowman et al., Selecting high affinity binding proteins by monovalent phage display, Biochemistry 30(45):10832-8 (1991). |
| Lu et al., Robust fluorescein-doped silica nanoparticles via dense-liquid treatment, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicachemical and Engineering Aspects, 303(3):207-210 (2007). |
| Luisi et al., Activity and Conformation of Enzymes in Reverse Micellar Solutions, Meth. Enzymol 136:188-216 (1987). |
| Lund et al., Assesment of methods for covalent binding of nucleic acids to magnetic beads, Dynabeads, and the characteristics of the bound nucleic acids in hybridization reactions, Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press, 16(22) (1998). |
| Lunderberg et al., Solid-phase technology: magnetic beads to improve nucleic acid detection and analysis, Biotechnology Annual Review, 1:373-401 (1995). |
| Lundstrom, et al., Breakthrough in cancer therapy: Encapsulation of drugs and viruses, www.currentdrugdiscovery.com, Nov. 19-23, 2002. |
| Lyne, P.D., Structure-Based Virtual Screening: An Overview, Drug Discov. Today, 7(20):1047-1055 (2002). |
| Ma, C. et al., In vitro protein engineering using synthetic tRNA(Ala) with different anticodons, Biochemistry 32(31):7939-45 (1993). |
| Mackenzie et al., The application of flow microfluorimetry to biomedical research and diagnosis: a review, Dev Biol Stand 64:181-193 (1986). |
| Mackenzie, IABS Symposium on Reduction of Animal Usage in the Development and Control of Biological Products, London, UK, 1985. |
| Maclean, D. et al., Glossary of terms used in combinatorial chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem. 71(12):2349-2365 (1999). |
| Magdassi et al., Multiple Emulsions: HLB Shift Caused by Emulsifier Migration to External Interface, J. Colloid Interface Sci 97:374-379 (1984). |
| Mahajan et al., Bcl-2 and Bax Interactions in Mitochondria Probed with Green Florescent Protein and Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Nat. Biotechnol. 16(6): 547-552 (1998). |
| Manley et al., In vitro transcription: whole cell extract, Methods Enzymol, 101:568-82 (1983). |
| Manz et al., Micromachining of monocrystalline silicon and glass for chemical analysis systems A look into next century's technology or just a fashionable craze, Trends in Analytical Chemistry 10(5):144-149 (1991). |
| Mao et al., Kinetic behaviour of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles: a stopped-flow study, Eur J Biochem 208(1):165-70 (1992). |
| Mao, Q. et al., Substrate effects on the enzymatic activity of alphachymotrypsin in reverse micelles, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 178(3):1105-12 (1991). |
| Mardis, E.R., The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics, Trends Genet 24:133-141 (2008). |
| Margulies, M et al., Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors, Nature 437(7057):376-380 (2005). |
| Marques et al., Porous Flow within Concentric Cylinders, Bull Am Phys Soc Div Fluid Dyn 41:1768 (1996). |
| Mason, T.J. and Bibette, J. Shear Rupturing of Droplets in Complex Fluids, Langmuir, 13(17):4600-4613 (1997). |
| Mastrobattista et al., High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: in vitro evolution of a beta-galactosidase by fluorescence-activated sorting of double emulsions, Chem. Biol. 12(12): 1291-1300 (2005). |
| Masui et al., Probing of DNA-Binding Sites of Escherichia coli RecA Protein Utilizing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-Sulfonic Acid, Biochem 37(35):12133-12143 (1998). |
| Matayoshi, E.D. et al., Novel fluorogenic substrates for assaying retroviral proteases by resonance energy transfer, Science 247:954 (1990). |
| Mattheakis et al., An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries, PNAS 91:9022-6 (1994). |
| Mayr, L.M., and Fuerst, P., The Future of High-Throughput Screening, JBiomol Screen 13:443-448 (2008). |
| Mazutis et al., Droplet-Based Microfluidic Systems for High-Throughput Single DNA Molecule Isothermal Amplification and Analysis, Anal Chem 81(12):4813-4821 (2009). |
| Mazutis et al., Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme, Lab Chip 9:2902-2908 (2009). |
| McCafferty et al., Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains,Nature, 348: 552-4 (1990). |
| McDonald and Whitesides, Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices, Account Chem. Res. 35:491-499 (2002). |
| McDonald et al., Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane), Electrophoresis 21(1):27-40 (2000). |
| Melton et al., Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter, Nucl. Acids Res. 12(18):7035-7056 (1984). |
| Mendel, D. et al., Site-Directed Mutagenesis with an Expanded Genetic Code, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 24:435-62 (1995). |
| Menger and Yamada, Enzyme catalysis in water pools, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101:6731-4 (1979). |
| Meylan and Howard, Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients, J Pharm Sci. 84(1):83-92 (1995). |
| Miele et al., Autocatalytic replication of a recombinant RNA, J Mol Biol, 171:281-95 (1983). |
| Minshuil, J. and Stemmer, W.P., Protein evolution by molecular breeding, Curr Opin Chem Biol 3(3): 284-90 (1999). |
| Miroux and Walker, Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels, J of Mol Biol 260(3):289-98 (1996). |
| Miyawaki et al., Fluorescent Indicators for Ca2+ Based on Green Fluorescent Proteins and Calmodulin, Nature, 388: 882-887 (1997). |
| Mize et al., Dual-enzyme cascade—an amplified method for the detection of alkaline phosphatase, Anal Biochem 179(2): 229-35 (1989). |
| Mock et al., A fluorometric assay for the biotin-avidin interaction based on displacement of the fluorescent probe 2-anilinonaphthalene-6-sulfonic acid, Anal Biochem, 151:178-81 (1985). |
| Moldavan, A., Photo-electric technique for the counting of microscopical cells, Science 80:188-189 (1934). |
| Montigiani, S. et al., Alanine substitutions in calmodulin-binding peptides result in unexpected affinity enhancement, J Mol Biol, 258:6-13 (1996). |
| Moore, M.J., Exploration by lamp light, Nature, 374:766-7 (1995). |
| Moudrianakis and Beer, Base sequence determination in nucelic acids with the electron microscope 3. Chemistry and microscopy of guanine-labeled DNA, PNAS 53:564-71 (1965). |
| Mueth et al., Origin of stratification in creaming emulsions, Physical Review Letters 77(3):578-581 (1996). |
| Mulbry, W.W. et al., Parathion hydrolase specified by the Flavobacterium opd gene: relationshio between the gene and protein. J Bacteriol, 171: 6740-6746 (1989). |
| Mulder et al., Characterization of two human monoclonal antibodies reactive with HLA-B12 and HLA-B60, respectively, raised by in vitro secondary immunization of peripheral blood lymphocytes, Hum. Immunol 36(3):186-192 (1993). |
| Nakano et al., High speed polymerase chain reaction in constant flow, Biosci Biotech and Biochem, 58:349-52 (1994). |
| Nakano et al., Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion, J Biotech, 102:117-24 (2003). |
| Nakano et al., Single-molecule reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using water-in-oil emulsion, J Biosci Bioeng 99:293-295 (2005). |
| Nametkin, S.N. et al., Cell-free translation in reversed micelles, FEB Letters, 309(3):330-32 (1992). |
| Narang et al., Improved phosphotriester method for the synthesis of gene fragments, Methods Enzymol, 68:90-98 (1979). |
| Nelson, P. S., et al., Bifunctional oligonucleotide probes synthesized using a novel CPG support are able to detect single base pair mutations, Nucl Acids Res 17(18): 7187-7194 (1989). |
| Nemoto et al., In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3 terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro, Federation of European Biochemical Societies, 414:405-8 (1997). |
| Ness, J.E. et al., Molecular Breeding: the natural approach to protein design. Adv Protein Chem, 55: 261-292 (2000). |
| Ng et al., Protein crystallization by capillary counter-diffusion for applied crystallographic structure determination, J. Struct. Biol, 142:218-231(2003). |
| Ng, B.L. et al., Factors affecting flow karyotype resolution, Cytometry, Part A 69A: 1028-1036 (2006). |
| Nguyen et al., Optical detection for droplet size control in microfluidic droplet-based analysis systems, Sensors and Actuators B 117(2):431-436 (2006). |
| Nihant et al., Polylactide Microparticles Prepared by Double Emulsion/Evaporation Technique. I. Effect of Primary Emulsion Stability, Pharmaceutical Research, 11(10):1479-1484 (1994). |
| Nisisako et al., Controlled formulation of monodisperse double emulsions in a multiple-phase microluidic system, Sot Matter, 1:23-27 (2005). |
| Nisisako et al., Formation of droplets using branch channels in a microfluidic circuit, Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. International Session Papers,1262-1264 (2002). |
| Nisisako et al., Microstructured Devices for Preparing Controlled Multiple Emulsions. Chem. Eng. Technol 31(8):1091-1098 (2008). |
| Nisisako, Takasi et al., Droplet Formation in a MicroChannel NetWO rk, Lab on a Chip, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 24-26. |
| Nissim, A. et al., Antibody fragments from a single pot phage display library as immunochemical reagents, Embo J, 13:692-8 (1994). |
| Nof and Shea, Drug-releasing scaffolds fabricated from drug-loaded microspheres, J. Biomed Mater Res 59:349-356 (2002). |
| Norman, A., Flow Cytometry, Med. Phys., 7(6):609-615 (1980). |
| Oberholzer et al., Enzymatic RNA replication in self-reproducing vesicles: an approach to a minimal cell, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 207(1):250-7 (1995). |
| Oberholzer et al., Polymerase chain reaction in liposomes, Chem. Biol. 2(10):677-82 (1995). |
| Obukowicz, M.G. et al., Secretion and export of IGF-1 in Escerichia coli strain JM101, Mol Gen Genet, 215:19-25 (1988). |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/246,911 mailed Feb. 8, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845 mailed Apr. 26, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,845 mailed Aug. 4, 2010. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/698,298, mailed Jun. 29, 2011. |
| Ogura, Y., Catalase activity at high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, Archs Biochem Biophys, 57: 288-300 (1955). |
| Oh et al., Distribution of Macropores in Silica Particles Prepared by Using Multiple Emulsions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 254(1): 79-86 (2002). |
| Okushima et al. Controlled production of monodisperse double emulsions by two-step droplet breakup in microfluidic devices, Langmuir 20(23): 9905-8 (2004). |
| Olsen et al., Function-based isolation of novel enzymes from a large library, Nat Bioteoltnol 13(10):1071-4 (2000). |
| Omburo, G.A. et al., Characterization of the zinc binding site of bacterial phosphotriesterase, J of Biological Chem, 267:13278-83 (1992). |
| Oroskar et al., Detection of immobilized amplicons by ELISA-like techniques, Clin. Chem. 42:1547-1555 (1996). |
| Ostermeier, M. et al., A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology, Nat Biotechnol, 17(12):1205-9 (1999). |
| Ouelette, A new wave of microfluidic devices, Indust Physicist pp. 14-17 (2003). |
| Pabit et al., Laminar-Flow Fluid Mixer for Fast Fluorescence Kinetics Studies, Biophys J 83:2872-2878 (2002). |
| Paddison et al., Stable suppression of gene expression by RNAi in mammalian cells, PNAS 99(3):1443-1448 (2002). |
| Pannacci et al., Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium States in Microluidic Double Emulsions Physical Review Leters, 101(16):164502 (2008). |
| Park et al., Cylindrical compact thermal-cycling device for continuoflow polymeras chain reaction, Anal Chem, ACS, 75:6029-33 (2003). |
| Park et al., Model of Formation of Monodispersed Colloids, J. Phys. Chem. B 105:11630-11635 (2001). |
| Parker et al., Development of high throughput screening assays using fluorescence polarization: nuclear receptor-ligand-binding and kinase/phosphatase assays, J Biomol Screen, 5(2): 77-88 (2000). |
| Parmley et al., Antibody-selectable filamentous fd phage vectors: affinity purification of target genes. Gene 73(2):305-18 (1988). |
| Pedersen et al., A method for directed evolution and functional cloning of enzymes, PNAS 95(18):10523-8 (1998). |
| Pelham and Jackson, An efficient mRNA-dependent translation system from reticulocyte lysates, Eur J Biochem 67:247-56 (1976). |
| Pelletier et al., An in vivo library-verslibrary selection of optimized protein-protein interactions, Nature Biotechnology, 17:683-90 (1999). |
| Peng et al., Controlled Production of Emulsions Using a Crossflow Membrane, Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 15:21-25 (1998). |
| Perelson et al., Theorectical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and relaibility of self-non-self discrimination. J Theor Biol 81(4):645-70 (1979). |
| Perez-Gilabert et al., Application of active-phase plot to the kinetic analysis of lipoxygenase in reverse micelles, Biochemistry J. 288:1011-1015 (1992). |
| Perrin, J., Polarisation de la lumiere de fluorescence vie moyenne des molecules dans letat excite, J. Phys. Rad. 1:390-401 (1926). |
| Petrounia, I.P. et al., Designed evolution of enzymatic properties, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 11:325-330 (2000). |
| Piemi et al., Transdermal delivery of glucose through hairless rat skin in vitro: effect of multiple and simple emulsions, Int J Pharm, 171:207-215 (1998). |
| Pirrung et al., A General Method for the Spatially Defined Immobilization of Biomolecules on Glass Surfaces Using ‘Caged’ Biotin, Bioconjug Chem 7: 317-321 (1996). |
| Ploem, in Fluorescent and Luminescent Probes for Biological Activity Mason, T. G. Ed., Academic Press, Landon, pp. 1-11, 1993. |
| Pluckthun, A. et al., In vitro selection and evolution of proteins, Adv Protein Chem, 55: 367-403 (2000). |
| Pollack et al., Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics, Lab Chip 2:96-101 (2002). |
| Pollack et al., Selective chemical catalysis by an antibody, Science 234(4783):1570-3 (1986). |
| Pons et al., Synthesis of Near-Infrared-Emitting, Water-Soluble CdTeSe/CdZnS Core/Shell Quantum Dots, Chemistry of Materials 21(8):1418-1424 (2009). |
| Posner et al., Engineering specificity for folate into dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli, Biochemistry, 35: 1653-63 (1996). |
| Poulin and Theil, “A priori” prediction of tissue: plasma partition coefficients of drugs to facilitate the use of physiologically-based pharmokinetic models in drug discovery, J Pharm Sci 89(1):16-35 (2000). |
| Priest, et al., Generation of Monodisperse Gel Emulsions in a Microfluidic Device, Applied Physics Letters, 88:024106 (2006). |
| Qi et al., Acid Beta-Glucosidase: Intrinsic Fluorescence and Conformational Changes Induced by Phospholipids and Saposin C, Biochem., 37(33): 11544-11554 (1998). |
| Raghuraman et al., Emulston Liquid Membranes for Wastewater Treatment: Equillibrium Models for Some Typical Metal-Extractant Systems,Environ. Sci. Technol 28:1090-1098 (1994). |
| Ralhan, Discovery and Verification of Head-and-neck Cancer Biomarkers by Differential Protein Expression Analysis Using iTRAQ Labeling, Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography, and Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Mol Cell Proteomics 7(6):1162-1173 (2008). |
| Ramsey, J.M., The burgeoning power of the shrinking laboratory, Nat Biotechnol 17(11):1061-2 (1999). |
| Ramstrom and Lehn, Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries, Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:26-36 (2002). |
| Raushel, F.M. et al., Phosphotriesterase: an enzyme in search of its natural substrate, Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, 74: 51-93 (2000). |
| Rech et al., Introduction of a yeast artificial chromosome vector into Sarrachomyeces cervesia by electroporation, Nucleic Acids Res 18:1313 (1990). |
| Reyes et al., Micro Total Analysis Systems. 1. Introduction, Theory and Technology, Anal Chem 74(12):2623-2636 (2002). |
| Riess, J.S., Fluorous micro- and nanophases with a biomedical perspective, Tetrahedron 58(20):4113-4131 (2002). |
| Roach et al., Controlling nonspecific protein adsorption in a plug-based microfluidic system by controlling inteifacial chemistry using fluorophase surfactants, Anal. Chem. 77:785-796 (2005). |
| Roberts & Ja, In vitro selection of nucleic acids and proteins: What are we learning, Curr Opin Struct Biol 9(4): 521-9 (1999). |
| Roberts et al., Simian virus 40 DNS directs synthesis of authentic viral polypeptides in a linked transcription-translation cell-free system 72(5):1922-1926 (1975). |
| Roberts, et al., RNS-peptide fusion for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins, PNAS 94:12297-302 (1997). |
| Roberts, J.W.,Termination factor for RNA synthesis, Nature, 224: 1168-74 (1969). |
| Roberts, R.W. Totally in vitro protein selection using mRNA-protein fusions and ribosome display. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3(3), 268-73 (1999). |
| Rodriguez-Antona et al., Quantitative RT-PCR measurement of human cytochrome P-450s: application to drug induction studies. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 376:109-116 (2000). |
| Rolland et al., Fluorescence Polarization Assay by Flow Cytometry, J. Immunol. Meth., 76(1): 1-10 (1985). |
| Rosenberg et al.,Termination of transcription in bacteriophage lambda, J Biol Chem, 250: 4755-64 (1975). |
| Rosenberry, T.L., Acetylcholinesterase, Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, 43: 103-218 (1975). |
| Rotman, Measurement of activities of single molecules of beta-galactosidase, PNAS, 47:1981-91 (1961). |
| Russon et al., Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis by allele-specific extension of fluorescently labeled nucleotides in a microfluidic flow-through device, Electrophoresis, 24:158-61 (2003). |
| Sadtler et al., Achieving stable, reverse water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Angew Chem Int Ed 35:1976-1978 (1996). |
| Saiki, R.K, et al., Primer directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239(4839):487-91 (1988). |
| Sakamoto, Rapid and simple quantification of bacterial cells by using a microfluidic device, Appl Env Microb. 71:2 (2005). |
| Sanchez et al., Breakup of Charged Capillary Jets, Bulletin of the American Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics 41:1768-1768 (1996). |
| Sano, T. et al., Immuno-PCR-Very sensitive antigen-detection by means of sepcific antibody-DNA conjugates. Science 258(5079), 120-122 (1992). |
| SantaLucia, A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics, PNAS 95(4):1460-5 (1998). |
| Santra et al., Fluorescence lifetime measurements to determine the core-shell nanostructure of FITC-doped silica nanoparticles: An optical approach to evaluate nanoparticle photostability, J Luminescence 117(1):75-82 (2006). |
| Schatz et al., Screening of peptide libraries linked to lac repressor, Methods Enzymol 267: 171-91 (1996). |
| Schneegass et al., Miniaturized flow-through PCR with different template types in a silicone chip thermocycler, Lab on a Chip, Royal Soc of Chem, 1:42-9 (2001). |
| Schubert et al., Designer Capsules, Nat Med 8:1362 (2002). |
| Schweitzer et al., Immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: A versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection, PNAS 97(18), 10113-10119 (2000). |
| Schweitzer, B. et al., Combining nucleic acid amplification and detection. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(1):21-7 (2001). |
| Scott, R.L., The Solubility of Fluorocarbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 70: 4090-4093 (1948). |
| Seethala and Menzel, Homogeneous, Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Src-Family Tyrosine Kinases, Anal Biochem 253(2):210-218 (1997). |
| Seiler et al., Planar glass chips for capillary electrophoresis: repetitive sample injection, quantitation, and separation efficiency, Anal Chem 65(10):1481-1488 (1993). |
| Selwyn M. J., A simple test for inactivation of an enzyme during assay, Biochim Biophys Acta 105:193-195 (1965). |
| Seo et al., Microfluidic consecutive flow-focusing droplet generators, Soft Matter, 3:986-992 (2007). |
| Seong and Crooks, Efficient Mixing and Reactions Within Microfluidic Channels Using Microbead-Supported Catalysts, J Am Chem Soc 124(45):13360-1 (2002). |
| Seong et al., Fabrication of Microchambers Defined by Photopolymerized Hydrogels and Weirs Within Microfluidic Systems: Application to DNA Hybridization, Analytical Chem 74(14):3372-3377 (2002). |
| Sepp et al., Microbead display by in vitro compartmentalisation: selection for binding using flow cytometry, FEBS Letters 532:455-58 (2002). |
| Serpersu et al., Reversible and irreversible modification of erythrocyte membranse permeability by electric field, Biochim Biophys Acta 812(3):779-785 (1985). |
| Shapiro, H.M., Multistation multiparameter flow cytometry: a critical review and rationale, Cytometry 3: 227-243 (1983). |
| Shestopalov et al., Multi-Step Synthesis of Nanoparticles Performed on Millisecond Time Scale in a Microfluidic Droplet-Based System, The Royal Society of Chemistry 4:316-321(2004). |
| Shtern V, and Hussain F., Hysteresis in swirling jets, J. Fluid Mech. 309:1-44 (1996). |
| Sia &Whitesides, Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies, Electrophoresis 24(21):3563-3576 (2003). |
| Sidhu, S.S., Phage display in pharmaceutical biotechnology, Curr Opin Biotech 11:610-616 (2000). |
| Siemering et al., Mutations that suppress the thermosensitivity of green fluorescent protein, Current Biology 6:1653-1663 (1996). |
| Silva-Cunha et al., W/O/W multiple emulsions of insulin containing a protease inhibitor and an absorption enhancer: biological activity after oral administration to normal and diabetic rats, Int J Pharm 169:33-44 (1998). |
| Sims et al., Immunopolymerase chain reaction using real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection, Anal. Biochem. 281(2):230-2 (2000). |
| Slappendel et al., Normal cations and abnormal membrane lipids in the red blood cells of dogs with familial stomatocytosis hypertrophic gastritis, Blood 84:904-909 (1994). |
| Slob et al., Structural identifiability of PBPK models: practical consequences for modeling strategies and study designs, Crit Rev Toxicol. 27(3):261-72 (1997). |
| Smith et al., Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads, Science 258(5085):1122-1126 (1992). |
| Smith et al., Fluorescence detection in automated DNA sequence analysis, Nature 321:674-679 (1986). |
| Smith et al., Phage display, Chemical Reviews 97(2), 391-410 (1997). |
| Smith et al., The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing an aliphatic amino group at the 5′ terminus: synthesis of fluorescent DNA primers for use in DNA sequence analysis, Nucl. Acid Res. 13:2399-2412 (1985). |
| Smith G.P., Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface, Science 228(4705): 1315-7(1985). |
| Smyth et al., Markers of apoptosis: methods for elucidating the mechanism of apoptotic cell death from the nervous system, Biotechniques 32:648-665 (2000). |
| Sohn, et al., Capacitance cytometry: Measuring biological cells one by one, PNAS 97(20):10687-10690 (2000). |
| Somasundaram and Ramalingam, Gain studies of Rhodamine 6G dye doped polymer laser, J Photochem Photobiol 125(1-3):93-98 (1999). |
| Song et al., A microfluidic system for controlling reaction networks in time, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42(7):768-772 (2003). |
| Song et al., Experimental Test of Scaling of Mixing by Chaotic Advection in Droplets Moving Through Microfluidic Channels, App Phy Lett 83(22):4664-4666 (2003). |
| Song, H. and Ismagilov, R.F., Millisecond kinetics on a microluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents, J Am Chem Soc. 125: 14613-14619 (2003). |
| Soni and Meller, Progress toward ultrafast DNA sequencing using solid-state nanopores, Clin Chem 53:1996-2001 (2007). |
| Soumillion et al., Novel concepts for the selection of catalytic activity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:387-394 (2001). |
| Soumillion et al., Selection of B-lactomase on filamentous bacteriophage by catalytic activity, J Mol Biol, 237:415-22 (1994). |
| Sproat et al., The synthesis of protected 5′-mercapto-2′,5′-dideoxyribonucleoside-3′-0- phosphorainidites, uses of 5′-mercapto-oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res 15:4837-4848 (1987). |
| Stauber, et al., Rapid generation of monoclonal antibody-secreting hybridomas against African horse sickness virus by in vitro immunization and the fusion/cloning technique, J. Immunol. Meth 161(2):157-168 (1993). |
| Stemmer, W.P., DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. PNAS 91(22):10747-51(1994). |
| Stemmer, W.P., Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling, Nature 370(6488):389-91 (1994). |
| Stober et al., Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range, J Colloid and Interface Sci 26(1):62-69 (1968). |
| Stofko, H.R. et al., A single step purification for recombinant proteins. Characterization of microtube associated protein (MAP2) fragment which associates with the type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase, Febs Lett 302: 274-278 (1992). |
| Stone et al., Engineering flows in small devices: Microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36:381-441 (2004). |
| Strizhkov et al., PCR amplification on a microarray of gel-immobilized oligonucleotides: Detection of bacterial toxin- and drug- resistant genes and their mutations, BioTechniques 29(4):844-857 (2000). |
| Stroock et al., Chaotic mixer for microchannels, Science 295(5555):647-651 (2002). |
| Studer et al., Fluorous Synthesis: A FluoroPhase Strategy for Improving Separation Efficiency in Organic Synthesis, Science 275: 823-826 (1997). |
| Sugiura et al., Effect of Channel Structure on MicroChannel Emuisification, Langmuir 18:5708-5712 (2002). |
| Sugiura et al., Interfacial tension driven monodispersed droplet formation from mtcrofabricated channel array Langmuir, 17: 5562-5566 (2001). |
| Sundberg et al., Spatially-Addressable Immobilisation of Macromolecules on Solid Supports, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 117:12050-12057 (1995). |
| Sung et al. Chip-based microfluidic devices coupled with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, Electrophoresis 26:1783-1791 (2005). |
| Suzuki et al., Random mutagenesis of thermus aquaticus DNA polmerase I: concordance of immutable sites in vivo with the crystal structure, PNAS USA, 93:96701-9675 (1996). |
| Tabatabai and Faghri, A New Two-Phase Flow Map and Transition Boundary Accounting for Surface Tension Effects in Horizontal Miniature and Micro Tubes, J Heat Transfer 123:958-968 (2001). |
| Tabatabai et al., Economic feasability study of polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) for water softening, J Membrane Science 100(3):193-207 (1995). |
| Tabatabai et al., Reducing Surfactant Adsorption on Carbonate Reservoirs, SPE Resenroir Engineering 8(2):117-122 (1993). |
| Tabatabai, Water Softening Using polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration, Separation Science Technology 30(2):211-224 (1995). |
| Takayama et al., Patterning Cells and Their Environments Using Multiple Laminar Fluid Flows in Capillary NetWO rks, PNAS 96:5545-5548 (1999). |
| Takeuchi et al., An Axisymmetric Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device, Adv. Mater 17(8):1067-1072 (2005). |
| Taly et al., Droplets as Microreactors for High-Throughput Biology, Chembiochem 8(3):263-272 (2007). |
| Tan et al., Controlled Fission of Droplet Emulsions in Bifurcating Microfluidic Channels, Transducers Boston (2003). |
| Tan et al., Design of microluidic channel geometries for the control of droplet volume, chemical concentration, and sorting, Lab Chip, 4(4): 292-298 (2004). |
| Tan et al., Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device, Sensors and Actuators 114:350-356 (2006). |
| Tan, Y.C., Microfluidic Liposome Generation from Monodisperse Droplet Emulsion-Towards the Realization of Artificial Cells, Summer Bioengineering Conference, Florida (2003). |
| Tan, Y.C., Monodisperse Droplet Emulsions in Co-Flow Microfluidic Channels, Micro TAS, Lake Tahoe (2003). |
| Tanaka et al., Ethanol Production from Starch by a Coimmobilized Mixed Culture System of Aspergillus awamori and Zymomonas mobilis, Biotechnol Bioeng XXVII:1761-1768 (1986). |
| Tang et al., A multi-color fast-switching microfluidic droplet dye laser, Lab Chip 9:2767-2771 (2009). |
| Taniguchi et al., Chemical Reactions in Microdroplets by Electrostatic Manipulation of Droplets in Liquid Media, Lab on a Chip 2:19-23 (2002). |
| Tawfik et al., catELISA: a facile general route to catalytic antibodies, PNAS 90(2):373-7 (1993). |
| Tawfik et al., Efficient and selective p-nitrophenyl-ester=hydrolyzing antibodies elicited by a p-nitrobenzyl phosphonate hapten, Eur J Biochem, 244:619-26 (1997). |
| Tawfik et al., Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution, Nature Biotechnology, 7(16):652-56 (1998). |
| Tawfik, D.S. et al., 1,8-diabycyclo[5.4.0]undecane mediated transesterification of p-nitrophenyl phosphonates—a novel route to phosphono esters, Synthesis-Stuttgart, 10: 968-972 (1993). |
| Taylor et al., Characterization of chemisorbed monolayers by surface potential measurments, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 24:1443 (1991). |
| Taylor, The formation of emulsions in definable field of flow, Proc R Soc London A 146(858):501-523 (1934). |
| Tchagang et al., Early detection of ovarian cancer using group biomarkers, Mol Cancer Ther 7:27-37 (2008). |
| Tencza et al., Development of a Fluorescence Polarization-Based Diagnostic Assay for Equine Infectious Anemia Virus, J Clinical Microbiol 38(5):1854-185 (2000). |
| Terray et al., Microfluidic Control Using Colloidal Devices,Science, 296(5574):1841-1844 (2002). |
| Terray, et al., Fabrication of linear colloidal structures for microfluidic applications, Applied Phys Lett 81(9):1555-1557 (2002). |
| Tewhey et al., Microdroplet-based PCR amplification for large scale targeted sequencing, Nat Biotechnol 27(11):1025-1031 (2009). |
| Theberge et al., Microdroplets in Microfluidics: An Evolving Platform for Discoveries in Chemistry and Biology, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 49(34):5846-5868 (2010). |
| Thompson, L.F., Introduction to Lithography, ACS Symposium Series 219:1-13, (1983). |
| Thorsen et al., Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device, Phys Rev Lett 86(18):4163-4166 (2001). |
| Thorsen et al., Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration, Science 298:580-584 (2002). |
| Tice et al., Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels, Analytica Chimica Acta 507:73-77 (2004). |
| Tice et al., Formation of droplets and mixing in multiphase microfluidics at low values of the reynolds and the capillary numbers, Langmuir 19:9127-9133 (2003). |
| Titomanlio et al., Capillary experiments of flow induced crystallization of HOPE, AlChe Journal, 36(1):13-18(1990). |
| Tleugabulova et al., Evaluating formation and growth mechanisms of silica particles using fluorescence anisotropy decay analysis, Langmuir 20(14):5924-5932 (2004). |
| Tokatlidis et al., Nascent chains: folding and chaperone intraction during elongation on ribosomes, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 348:89-95 (1995). |
| Tokeshi et al., ContinuoFlow Chemical Processing on a Microchip by Combining Microunit Operations and a Multiphase Flow NetWO rk, Anal Chem 74(7):1565-1571 (2002). |
| Tokumitsu, H. et al., Preparation of gadopentetic acid-loaded chitosan microparticles for gadolinium neutron-capture therapy of cancer by a novel emulsion-droplet coalescence technique, Chem and Pharm Bull 47(6):838-842 (1999). |
| Tramontano, A., Catalytic antibodies, Science 234(4783):1566-70 (1986). |
| Trindade, T., Nanocrystalline semiconductors: synthesis, properties, and perspectives, Chem. Mat. 13:3843-3858 (2001). |
| Tripet, B. et al., Engineering a de novo-designed coiled-coil heterodimerization domain off the rapid detection, purification and characterization of recombinantly expressed peptides and proteins, Protein Engng., 9:1029-42 (1996). |
| Tuerk, C. and Gold, L., Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponentid Enrichment: RNA Ligands to Bacteriophage T4 DNA Polymerase, Science, 249:505-10 (1990). |
| Umbanhowar et al., Monodisperse Emulsion Generation via Drop Break Off in a Coflowing Stream, Langmuir 16(2):347-351 (2000). |
| Unger et al., Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multylayer soft lithography, Science 288(5463):113-116 (2000). |
| Utada, A. et al., Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device, Science, 308:537-541 (2005). |
| Vainshtein et al., Peptide rescue of an N-terminal truncation of the stoffel fragment of Taq DNA polymerase, Protein Science, 5:1785-92 (1996). |
| Van Bockstaele et al., Prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a comprehensive review, Blood Rev 23(1):25-47 (2009). |
| Van Dilla et al., The fluorescent cell photometer: a new method for the rapid measurement of biological cells stained with fluorescent dyes, Annual Report of the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California (Los Alamos, NM), Biological and Medical Research Groupp (H-4) of the Health Division, Compiled by D. G. Ott, pp. 100-105, distributed Jan. 23, 1968. |
| Van Dille et al., Cell Microfluorometry: A Method for Rapid Fluorescence Measurement, Science 163(3872):1213-1214 (1969). |
| Vanhooke et al., Three-dimensional structure of the zinc-containing phosphotrieesterase with the bound substrate analog diethy 4-methylbenzylphosphonate, Biochemistry 35:6020-6025 (1996). |
| Varga, J.M. et al., Mechanism of allergic cross-reactions-I. Multispecific binding of ligands to a mouse monoclonal anti-DNP IgE antibody. Mol Immunol 28(6), 641-54 (1991). |
| Vary, A homogeneous nucleic acid hybridization assay based on strand displacement, Nucl Acids Res 15(17):6883-6897 (1987). |
| Venkateswaran et al., Production of Anti-Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies by In Vitro Immunization, Hybirdoma, 11(6):729-739 (1992). |
| Venter et al., The sequence of the human genome, Science 291(5507):1304-51 (2001). |
| Vogelstein et al., Digital PCR, PNAS 96(16):9236-9241 (1999). |
| Voss, E.W., Kinetic measurements of molecular interactions by spectrofluorometry, J Mol Recognit, 6:51-58 (1993). |
| Wahler, D. et al., Novel methods for biocatalyst screening. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 5: 152-158 (2001). |
| Walde, P. et al., Oparin's reactions revisited: enzymatic synthesis of poly(adenylic acid) in micelles and self-reproducing vesicles. J Am Chem Soc, 116: 7541-7547 (1994). |
| Walde, P. et al., Spectroscopic and kinetic studies of lipases solubilized in reverse micelles, Biochemistry, 32(15):4029-34 (1993). |
| Walde, P. et al., Structure and activity of trypsin in reverse micelles, Eur J Biochem, 173(2):401-9 (1988). |
| Walker et al., Isothermal in vitro amplification of DNA by a restriction enzyme/DNA polymerase system, PNAS 89(1):392-6 (1992). |
| Walker et al., Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique, Nucleic Acid Res, 20(7):1691-6 (1992). |
| Wang et al., DEP actuated nanoliter droplet dispensing using feedback control, Lab on a Chip 9:901-909 (2008). |
| Wang et al., Preparation of Titania Particles Utilizing the Insoluble Phase Interface in a MicroChannel Reactor, Chemical Communications 14:1462-1463 (2002). |
| Wang, A.M. et al., Quantitation of mRNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Proc natl Acad Sci USA 86(24), 9717-21 (1989). |
| Wang, G.T. et al., Design and synthesis of new fluorogenic HIV protease substrates based on resonance energy transfer, Tetrahedron Lett., 31:6493 (1990). |
| Warburton, B., Microcapsules for Multiple Emulsions, Encapsulation and Controlled Release, Spec Publ R Soc Chem, 35-51 (1993). |
| Wasserman et al., Structure and reactivity of allyl- siloxane monolayers formed by reaction of allcyltrichlorosilanes on silicon substrates, Langmuir 5:1074-1087 (1989). |
| Weil. et al., Selective and accurate initiation of transcription at the Ad2 major late promotor in a soluble system dependent on purified RNA polymerase II and DNA, Cell, 18(2):469-84 (1979). |
| Werle et al., Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR products for direct sequencing, Nucl Acids Res 22(20):4354-4355 (1994). |
| Wetmur et al., Molecular haplotyping by linking emulsion PCR: analysis of paraoxonase 1 haplotypes and phenotypes, Nucleic Acids Res 33(8):2615-2619 (2005). |
| Wick et al., Enzyme-containing liposomes can endogenously produce membrane-constituting lipids, Chem Biol 3(4):277-85 (1996). |
| Widersten and Mannervik, Glutathione Transferases with Novel Active Sites Isolated by Phage Display from a Library of Random Mutants, J Mol Biol 250(2):115-22 (1995). |
| Wiggins et al., Foundations of chaotic mixing, Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 362(1818):937-70 (2004). |
| Williams et al., Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR, Nature Methods 3(7):545-550 (2006). |
| Williams et al., Methotrexate, a high-affinity pseudosubstrate of dihydrofolate reductase, Biochemistry, 18(12):2567-73 (1979). |
| Wilson, D.S. and Szostak, J.W., In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 68: 611-647 (1999). |
| Winter et al., Making antibodies by phage display technology, Annu Rev Immunol 12:433-55 (1994). |
| Wittrup, K.D., Protein engineering by cell-surface display. Curr Opin Biotechnology, 12: 395-399 (2001). |
| Wolff et al., Integrating advanced functionality in a microfabricated high-throughput fluorescent-activated cell sorter, Lab Chip, 3(1): 22-27 (2003). |
| Wronski et al., Two-color, fluorescence-based microplate assay for apoptosis detection. Biotechniques, 32:666-668 (2002). |
| Wu et al., The ligation amplification reaction (LAR)-amplification of specific DNA sequences using sequential rounds of template-dependent ligation, Genomics 4(4):560-9 (1989). |
| Wyatt et al., Synthesis and purification of large amounts of RNA oligonucleotides, Biotechniques 11(6):764-9 (1991). |
| Xia and Whitesides, Soft Lithography, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37:550-575 (1998). |
| Xia and Whitesides, Soft Lithography, Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci. 28:153-184 (1998). |
| Xu, S. et al., Generation of monodisperse particles by using microfluidics: control over size, shape, and composition, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44:724-728 (2005). |
| Yamagishi, J. et al., Mutational analysis of structure-activity relationships in human tumor necrosis factor-alpha, Protein Eng, 3:713-9 (1990). |
| Yamaguchi et al., Insulin-loaded biodegradable PLGA microcapsules: initial burst release controlled by hydrophilic additives, Journal of Controlled Release, 81(3): 235-249 (2002). |
| Yelamos, J. et al., Targeting of non-Ig sequences in place of the V segment by somatic hypermutation. Nature 376(6537):225-9 (1995). |
| Yershov et al., DNA analysis and diagnostics on oligonucleotide microchips, PNAS 93(10):4913-4918 (1996). |
| Yonezawa et al., DNA display for in vitro selection of diverse peptide libraries, Nucleic Acids Research, 31(19): e118 (2203). |
| Yu et al., Responsive biomimetic hydrogel valve for microfluidics. Appl. Phys. Lett 78:2589-2591 (2001). |
| Yu et al., Quantum dot and silica nanoparticle doped polymer optical fibers, Optics Express 15(16):9989-9994 (2007). |
| Yu et al., Specifc inhibition of PCR by non-extendable oligonucleotides using a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease- deficient DNA polymerase, Biotechniques 23(4):714-6, 718-20 (1997). |
| Zaccolo, M. et al., An approach to random mutagenesis of DNA using mixtures of triphosphate derivatives of nucleoside analogues. J Mol Biol 255(4):589-603 (1996). |
| Zakrzewski, S.F., Preparation of tritiated dihydrofolic acid of high specific activity, Methods Enzymol, 539 (1980). |
| Zaug and Cech, The intervening sequence RNA of Tetrahymena is an enzyme, Science 231(4737):470-5 (1986). |
| Zaug and Cech, The Tetrahymena intervening sequence ribonucleic acid enzyme is a phosphotransferase and an acid phosphatase, Biochemistry 25(16):4478-82 (1986). |
| Zaug et al., The Tetrahymena ribozyme acts like an RNA restriction endonuclease, Nature 324(6096):429-33 (1986). |
| Zhang et al., A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays, Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 4(2): 67-73 (1999). |
| Zhang, Z.Y., Substrate specificity of the protein tyrosine phosphatases, PNAS 90: 4446-4450 (1993). |
| Zhao, B. et al., Control and Applications of Immiscible Liquids in Microchannels, J. Am. Chem. Soc, vol. 124:5284-5285 (2002). |
| Zhao, H. et al., Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination. Nat Biotechnol 16(3):258-61 (1998). |
| Zheng et al., A Droplet-Based, Composite PDMS/Glass Capillary Microfluidic System for Evaluating Protein Crystallization Conditions by Microbatch and Vapor-Diffusion Methods with On-Chip X-Ray Diffraction, Angew. Chem.,116:1-4, (2004). |
| Zheng et al., A Microiuidic Approach for Screening Submicroliter Volumes against Multiple Reagents by Using Performed Arrays of Nanoliter Plugs in a Three-Phase Liquid/Liquid/Gas Flow, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44(17): 2520-2523 (2005). |
| Zheng et al., Formation of Droplets of Alternating Composition in Microfluidic Channels and Applications to Indexing of Concentrations in Droplet-Based /Assays, Anal. Chem.,76: 4977-4982 (2004). |
| Zheng et al., Screening of Protein Crystallization Conditions on a Microfluidic Chip Using Nanoliter-Size Droplets, J Am Chem Soc 125(37):11170-11171 (2003). |
| Zimmermann et al., Dielectric Breakdown of Cell Membranes, Biophys J 14(11):881-889 (1974). |
| Zimmermann et al., Microscale Production of Hybridomas by Hypo-Osmolar Electrofusion, Hum. Antibod. Hybridomas, 3(1): 14-18 (1992). |
| Zubay, G., In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems, Annu Rev Genet, 7: 267-87 (1973). |
| Zubay, G., The isolation and properties of CAP, the catabolite gene activator, Methods Enzymol, 65: 856-77 (1980). |
| Zuckermann, R. et al., Efficient Methods for Attachment of Thiol-Specific Probes to the 3(-end of Synthetic Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Res. 15:5305-5321 (1987). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110250597 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61388937 | Oct 2010 | US | |
| 61347158 | May 2010 | US | |
| 61331490 | May 2010 | US | |
| 61304163 | Feb 2010 | US |
