BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a view showing an underlying technique of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram functionally showing a configuration of a digital document management system as the underlying technique of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a view showing an example of policy information;
FIG. 4 is a view showing an example of partial identification information;
FIG. 5 shows a storage state at the new document registration time;
FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing operation of new document registration processing;
FIG. 7 is a view showing an example in which a correctable area and non-correctable area are identified;
FIG. 8 is a view showing an example of partial correction information;
FIG. 9 is a view showing a storage state at the registration document correction time;
FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing operation of registration document correction processing;
FIG. 11 is a view showing the correction policy information and partial correction information to be compared;
FIG. 12 is a view showing the agreement document and partial identification information to be compared;
FIG. 13 is a view showing a new version of partial identification information and a previous version of partial identification information to be compared;
FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing operation of registration document verification processing;
FIG. 15 is a view conceptually showing the usage scene in a second phase;
FIG. 16 is a view showing an original document storage state at the registration document correction (partial sanitizing) time;
FIG. 17 is a view showing a complete set of agreement document to be transmitted;
FIG. 18 is a flowchart showing operation of registration document distribution (transmission) processing;
FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing operation of reception processing of a document to be registered;
FIG. 20 is a flowchart showing operation of registration document acquisition processing;
FIG. 21 is a view showing a third-party certification 1;
FIG. 22 is a view showing a third-party certification 2;
FIG. 23 is a view showing a third-party certification 3;
FIG. 24 is a view showing the usage scene of the second application field in underlying technique 2;
FIG. 25 is a view showing an example in which the main body of an insurance application form (first version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 26 is a view showing an XML data model of the insurance application form (first version);
FIG. 27 is a view showing an example in which partial identification information generated at the creation time of the insurance application form (first version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 28 is a view showing the XML data model constituted only by a set of “contractor”;
FIG. 29 is an original document storage state at the creation time of the insurance application form (first version);
FIG. 30 is a view showing an example in which an updated insurance application form—main body (second version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 31 is a view showing an example in which an insurance application form—partial identification information (second version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 32 is a view showing an original document storage state at the creation time of an insurance application form (second version);
FIG. 33 is a view showing a verification data group that a financial institution representative can review;
FIG. 34 is a view showing an example in which an insurance application form—main body (third version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 35 is a view showing an example in which an insurance application form—partial identification information (third version) is represented using XML data;
FIG. 36 is a view showing an original document storage state at the creation time of the insurance application form (third version);
FIG. 37 is a view showing coupling-management of all the partial identification information required for verifying the second version;
FIG. 38 a view showing coupling-management of all the partial identification information required for verifying the third version;
FIG. 39 is a view showing an example in which the method 2 is used to represent the partial identification information (second version) using XML data;
FIG. 40 is a view showing an original document storage state at the creation time of the insurance application form (third version) in the method 2;
FIG. 41 is a view showing an example of XML data for evaluation/analysis;
FIG. 42 is a view showing the update of XML data for evaluation/analysis;
FIG. 43 is a view showing generation and verification of the partial identification information according to the method 0;
FIG. 44 is a view showing generation and verification of the partial identification information according to the method 1;
FIG. 45 is a view showing generation and verification of the partial identification information according to the method 2;
FIG. 46 shows a result of method-based analysis;
FIG. 47 shows a bubble chart representing the result of the method-based analysis;
FIG. 48 is a view showing the overview of the processing of the underlying technique 1;
FIG. 49 is a view showing the overview of the processing of the underlying technique 2;
FIG. 50 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 51 is a view showing operation performed at the signature time in the first embodiment;
FIG. 52 is a view showing operation performed at the first sanitizing time in the first embodiment;
FIG. 53 is a view showing operation performed at the second and subsequent sanitizing time in the first embodiment;
FIG. 54 is a view showing operation performed at the signature verification time in the first embodiment;
FIG. 55 is a view schematically showing effects of the first embodiment in comparison with the underlying technique;
FIG. 56 is a view showing the overview of the operation performed in the first embodiment;
FIG. 57 is a view showing operation performed at the signature time in a second embodiment;
FIG. 58 is a view showing operation performed at the first sanitizing time in the second embodiment;
FIG. 59 is a view showing operation performed at the second and subsequent sanitizing time in the second embodiment;
FIG. 60 is a view showing operation performed at the signature verification time in the second embodiment;
FIG. 61 is a view schematically showing effects of the first embodiment and second embodiment in comparison with the underlying technique;
FIG. 62 is a view showing the overview of the operation performed in the second embodiment;
FIG. 63 is a view showing operation performed at the signature time in a third embodiment;
FIG. 64 is a view showing operation performed at the first sanitizing time in the third embodiment;
FIG. 65 is a view showing operation performed at the second and subsequent sanitizing time in the third embodiment;
FIG. 66 is a view showing operation performed at the signature verification time in the third embodiment;
FIG. 67 is a view showing the overview of the operation performed in the third embodiment;
FIG. 68 is a view schematically showing effects of the third embodiment in comparison with the underlying technique;
FIG. 69 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a fourth embodiment; and
FIG. 70 is a view showing an example of a conventional paper agreement document that has been corrected.