This application claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/131,554, filed 14 Sep. 2018, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates generally to communication systems, and specifically to a digital signal conditioner system.
The demand for high-throughput data transmission is ever increasing. Wireless or optical communications systems are typically optimized with respect to transmission and/or reception to enhance bandwidth utilization and increase transmission throughput. To improve reception, receiver systems may include filtering and/or other signal processing techniques. For example, a received signal can be sampled, and each of the samples can be processed via a filter system. Among other processing, the filtering system can help to remove artifacts and distortions in the received signal. Additionally, multiple data streams corresponding to different components of a common signal, such as multiple components of a quadrature signal and/or quadrature signals on multiple polarization components of a signal, can be conditioned to provide for commonality and consistency in given digital sample stream or set of digital sample streams.
The present disclosure relates generally to communications systems, and specifically to a digital signal conditioner (DSC) system. The DSC system can be implemented in a digital signal processor (DSP) circuit, such as in an integrated circuit (IC). For example, the DSC system can be implemented in a DSP of an optical receiver to provide signal conditioning on digital samples of dual-polarization quadrature optical signals. For example, the DSC system can be implemented to provide signal conditioning on input digital samples and to generate conditioned, e.g., deskewed and/or resampled, output digital samples at a predetermined fixed output oversampling factor for further processing in other systems of the DSP comprising the DSC system. For example, the DSC system can be configured to receive input digital sample blocks and to generate conditioned output digital sample blocks at a predetermined oversampling factor with each output digital sample block comprising a predetermined fixed number of samples.
The DSC system includes an overhang module configured to receive input digital sample blocks associated with an input signal, such as provided from an ADC, and to generate augmented digital sample blocks. The augmented digital sample blocks can be formed by prepending an overhang portion comprising a proper subset of digital samples from a preceding one of the input digital sample blocks to the respective one of the input digital sample blocks. As an example, the overhang portion can include a number of digital samples to allow for delay/advance operations to be performed on the augmented digital sample blocks of the input signal to compensate for a skew between the input signal and another input signal(s) to align output digital sample blocks of the respective input signals.
The DSC system also includes a sample selector bank and a filter bank. Each sample selector in the sample selector bank is configured to select a subset of digital samples from each augmented digital sample block to be provided to a respective filter of the filter bank. For example, each sample selector in the sample selector bank can be provided a respective predetermined portion of each augmented digital sample block, and can include a multiplexer that is configured to select a subset of the respective predetermined portion of the augmented digital sample block based on an integer portion of a respective one of a plurality of selection signals. As an example, the selection signals can be generated based on a deskew signal that defines the amount of deskew to be applied to compensate for the skew between the input signal and another input signal(s) (e.g., between in-phase and quadrature-phase component signals, or between in-phase and quadrature-phase component signals of both polarizations in case of dual-polarization quadrature optical signals), as well as a control signal that defines a selected one of a plurality of supported operating modes of the DSC system.
As used herein, the term the “supported operating modes” describe several predetermined operating modes that a DSP of a receiver comprising the DSC system, and hence, the DSC system itself, can be configured to operate at. Similarly, the “selected operating mode” is used herein to describe the selected one of the supported operating modes. Each one of the supported operating modes can be associated with an input sampling rate, an input oversampling factor, a symbol (or baud) rate, and/or a resampling ratio. Thus, as described herein, the terms “supported input oversampling rates,” “supported input oversampling factors,” “supported symbol rates,” and/or “supported resampling ratios” describe several predetermined input sampling rates, “input oversampling factors,” symbol rates and “resampling ratios,” respectively, that can be associated with one or more of the supported operating modes. Thus, each selected operating mode is associated with an input sampling rate, an input oversampling factor, a symbol rate and a resampling ratio. Any of the foregoing terms associated with a selected operating mode is understood to be “selected.” For example, the term “selected input oversampling factor” is understood to refer to the input oversampling factor associated with a selected operating mode. As used herein, the term “input oversampling factor” associated with an operating mode refers to the ratio of the input sampling rate to the symbol (or baud) rate associated with that operating mode, where the input sampling rate associated with an operating mode is defined as the sampling rate used to sample the input signal to generate the corresponding input digital samples in that operating mode. Also, as used herein, the term “resampling ratio” of an operating mode is described as the ratio of the input oversampling factor associated with that operating mode to the predetermined fixed output oversampling factor of the DSC system. As used herein, the term “subset,” unless expressly stated to the contrary, includes within its scope both all of the elements of the set and a proper subset of the elements of the set. Thus, references herein to a “subset” include a “proper subset.”
The selected subset of the samples from each of the sample selectors is provided to a respective filter of the filter bank. Also, each filter is provided a set of tap weights by a respective tap weights selector in a tap weights selector bank. The filter can thus generate a weighted sample by multiplying the set of samples by the set of tap weights and adding the products together. As an example, each tap weights selector can generate the set of tap weights based on a fractional portion of a respective one of the plurality of selection signals. The weighted samples can thus be provided to a reformattor that can generate a filtered sample block based on a selected resampling ratio. As an example, the selected resampling ratio can be 1:1, 1:2, 2:3, or 3:4. By discarding irrelevant samples and reorganizing the relevant ones based on the selected resampling ratio via the reformattor, the DSC system can thus provide output digital sample blocks comprising the predetermined fixed number of samples at a predetermined fixed output oversampling factor, regardless of which of many supported input oversampling factors the input digital sample blocks are provided to the DSC system. Thus, based on the selected resampling ratio, each digital output block can include at least one of the filtered sample blocks and can include at least a portion of an additional filtered sample block to maintain the predetermined fixed output oversampling factor regardless of the selected input oversampling factor.
In the example of
In the example of
The DSC system 10 also includes a tap weights selector bank 14. The tap weights selector bank 14 can include a plurality of tap weights selectors that are each configured to generate a set of tap weights based on a respective one of the selection signals SEL. As an example, the quantity of the tap weights selectors can be equal to the number of digital samples in the input digital sample blocks IN_SMPL (e.g., 256). For example, the sets of tap weights can be generated by each of the tap weights selectors in the tap weights selector bank 14 based on a fractional portion of the selection signals SEL.
The DSC system 10 also includes a filter bank 16. The filter bank 16 includes a plurality of filters (e.g., finite impulse response (FIR) filters). As an example, the quantity of the filters can be equal to the number of digital samples in the input digital sample blocks IN_SMPL (e.g., 256). Each of the filters of the filter bank 16 receives the selected subset of the samples from each of the respective sample selectors of the sample selector bank 12, and also receives a set of tap weights provided from the respective tap weights selector in the tap weights selector bank 14. Each respective filter of the filter bank 16 thus, for example, generates a weighted sample by multiplying the respective set of samples by a respective set of tap weights and adding the resulting products together.
The weighted samples can thus be provided to a reformattor 18 that can generate a filtered sample block based on a selected resampling ratio. As an example, the resampling ratio can be 1:1, 1:2, 2:3, or 3:4. By discarding irrelevant samples and reorganizing the relevant ones based on the selected resampling ratio via the reformattor 18, the DSC system 10 can thus provide output digital sample blocks R_SMPL comprising the predetermined fixed number of samples at a predetermined fixed output oversampling factor, regardless of which one of a variety of supported input oversampling factors that the input digital sample blocks are provided to the DSC system 10. For example, based on the selected resampling ratio, each output digital sample block can include at least one of the filtered sample blocks, and can include at least a portion of an additional filtered sample block to maintain the predetermined output oversampling factor regardless of the selected input oversampling factor.
The DSC system 50 receives input digital sample blocks IN_SMPL that are associated with an input signal. As an example, the input digital sample blocks IN_SMPL can be provided from an ADC in the associated receiver comprising the DSP comprising the DSC system 50. For example, the input signal can be a first input signal that can be associated with a second input signal, such as based on first and second input signals modulated onto orthogonal polarizations of light or based on the first and second input signals forming a quadrature signal pair.
In the example of
The augmented digital sample blocks 102 each include a digital sample block portion 104 and an overhang portion 106. In the example of
In the example of
Referring back to the example of
Both the resampling ratio of the selected operating mode identified by the CTRL signal and the deskew value identified by the DSKW signal can impact how samples are chosen and how tap weights are generated for inputs to each filter of a filter bank 64 in a sample selector bank 56 and a tap weights selector bank 60, respectively, of the DSC system 50 as shown in
As noted, the DSC system 50 also includes the sample selector bank 56. The sample selector bank 56 includes a plurality N of sample selectors 58, where N is equal to the number of digital samples in the input digital sample blocks IN_SMPL (e.g., 256). The sample selectors 58 are each configured to select a subset of digital samples from each of the augmented digital sample blocks A_SMPL. Each of the sample selectors 58 can be provided a predetermined portion of the augmented digital sample blocks A_SMPL (e.g., increasing in range by a single sample). For example, each of the predetermined portions can be equal in quantity of samples to the quantity of samples in a given overhang portion 106 of a given one of the augmented digital sample blocks A_SMPL. For example, each of the sample selectors 58 can include a multiplexer that is configured to select a subset of the respective predetermined portion of each of the augmented digital sample blocks A_SMPL based on the first portion of the respective one of the selection signals SEL, and thus based on the respective effective integer shift value.
The diagram 150 demonstrates an augmented digital sample block 152 corresponding to one of the augmented input digital sample blocks A_SMPL that is provided by the overhang module 52. The augmented digital sample block 152 includes a digital sample block portion 154, demonstrated as SAMPLE BLOCK X and an overhang portion 156, demonstrated as OVERHANG PORTION X−1, such as prepended to the digital sample block portion 154 from a preceding augmented digital sample block. As described previously, each of the sample selectors 58 selects a subset of digital samples from the augmented digital sample block 152. For example, each of the sample selectors 58 can be provided a predetermined portion of the augmented digital sample block 152, with each of the predetermined portions being demonstrated as a group G in the example of
In the example of
As described previously, the selection signals SEL include a first portion that defines the effective integer shift value. The multiplexer 160 can thus receive the first portion of the selection signal SEL_K as an input to select the subset of samples SGSK based on the effective integer shift value. In the example of
Referring back to the example of
As an example, filter tap weights of each filter corresponding to each supported operating mode can be represented in its polyphase representation and stored in memory within the tap weights selector bank 60 for access by the tap weights selectors 62. Supported resampling ratios by the DSC system 50 can be represented as a rational number L/M with L being a predetermined fixed non-zero integer value and M being set based on the selected resampling ratio and the value L. For example, setting the value L to 128, the resampling ratio 1:1 can be represented as 128:128, the resampling ratio 1:2 can be represented as 128:256, and so on. In the previous example with L is equal to 128, it is possible to generate output samples at a fractional-sample spacing of 1/128th of a sample period. For example, if each filter in the filter bank 64 has sixteen filter taps then the filter can be represented by a two-dimensional look-up table with L rows and sixteen columns, with each row housing sixteen tap weights of the corresponding phase of the polyphase filter. Therefore, each of the tap weights selectors 62 of the tap weights selector bank 60 can generate (e.g., select) tap weights utilizing such a look-up table. For example, each tap weights selector 62 can acquire the tap weights at a row selected based on the second portion of the respective selection signal that defines the effective fractional-sample instance. In other words, the fractional portion of the selection signal SEL corresponding to the respective tap weights selector 62 can determine the row of the polyphase filter look-up table from which the tap weights TW are drawn for use by the respective filter 66 in the filter bank 64. In such an embodiment, fixing the value L to a predetermined value regardless of the supported operating modes and the associated supported resampling ratios a more-efficient hardware implementation can be realized.
The DSC system 50 also includes the filter bank 64 as shown in
In the example of
The Kth filter includes a quantity Y of multipliers 202 that are each configured to multiply a given one of the digital samples of the subset of samples SGK with a respective one of the tap weights TWK. In the example of
Referring back to the example of
As an example, based on the control signal CTRL providing an indication of a 1:1 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 does not discard any of the weighted samples W_SMPL in providing the respective filtered sample block. However, based on the control signal CTRL providing an indication of a 1:2 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every other one of the weighted samples W_SMPL in providing the respective filtered sample block. As another example, based on the control signal CTRL providing an indication of a 2:3 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every third one of the weighted samples W_SMPL in providing the respective filtered sample block. As yet another example, based on the control signal CTRL providing an indication of a 3:4 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every fourth one of the weighted samples W_SMPL in providing the respective filtered sample block.
As described previously, the reformattor 68 provides the output digital sample blocks R_SMPL comprising a predetermined fixed number of digital samples at a predetermined fixed output oversampling factor, regardless of which one of a variety of supported input oversampling factors that the input signal is provided to the DSC system 50. Since the reformattor 68 selectively discards some of the weighted samples as described above, depending on the predetermined fixed number of samples desired in each output digital sample block, the reformattor 68 might not have enough samples to generate an output digital sample block at a given clock cycle. For example, if the predetermined fixed number of samples in each output digital sample block R_SMPL is set as the same as the number N, say 256, of samples in each input digital sample block IN_SMPL, then when the resampling ratio is set to 1:2, for each valid clock cycle, the DSC system 50 could generate 128 relevant weighted samples, not sufficient to generate an output digital sample block. In the next clock cycle, however, with another set of 128 weighted samples having been generated, the reformattor can thus form an output digital sample block R_SMPL of the desired size, i.e., 256 samples, and release the output sample block in that clock cycle. Therefore, with the 1:2 resampling ratio, the DSC system 50 can be said to generate valid output digital sample blocks for every two valid input digital sample blocks. Therefore, each of the output digital sample blocks R_SMPL can include one or more (e.g., a portion or an integer total) of the filtered sample blocks that include the weighted samples W_SMPL to fill the predetermined fixed number of digital samples in each of the output digital sample blocks R_SMPL.
As an example, in each valid clock cycle, the reformattor 68 can be configured to buffer each of the weighted samples W_SMPL (e.g., the weighted samples W_SMPL that are not discarded based on the resampling ratio) generated in that clock cycle processing the corresponding received input digital sample block IN_SMPL. In response to the number of buffered weighted samples W_SMPL being equal to the predetermined fixed number of digital samples in each output digital sample block R_SMPL in each clock cycle, the reformattor 68 can release the given output digital sample block R_SMPL in that clock cycle. If the number of buffered weighted samples W_SMPL is greater than the predetermined fixed number of digital samples in each output digital sample block in a given clock cycle, then the reformattor 68 can still release an output digital sample block R_SMPL in that clock cycle while keeping the excess weighted samples in buffer to be combined with the weighted samples to be generated in a subsequent clock cycle(s). If the number of buffered weighted samples W_SMPL is less than the predetermined fixed number of digital samples in each output digital sample block in a given clock cycle, such as based on the resampling ratio being smaller than the 1:1 ratio, then the reformattor 68 can keep on buffering weighted samples W_SMPL until the number of buffered weighted samples W_SMPL is greater than or equal to the predetermined fixed number digital samples in each output digital sample block R_SMPL. As a result, a given one of the filtered sample blocks can occupy more than one of the output digital sample block R_SMPL, such as having a first portion in a given output digital sample block R_SMPL and a second portion in a next proceeding output digital sample block R_SMPL.
In each of the examples 252, 254, 256, and 258, the output digital sample blocks are demonstrated as each having the same width diagrammatically, thus indicating the number of digital samples in each of the output digital sample blocks being equal in each of the examples 252, 254, 256, and 258. However, as described in greater detail herein, the number of digital samples (e.g., weighted samples W_SMPL) in each of the filtered sample blocks is different in each of the examples 252, 254, 256, and 258. As described previously, the reformattor 68 can buffer each of the weighted samples W_SMPL, and in response to the number of buffered weighted samples W_SMPL being greater than or equal to the predetermined fixed number of digital samples in a given output digital sample block R_SMPL, the reformattor 68 can release the given output digital sample block R_SMPL, keeping any excess weighted samples in the buffer. Therefore, some of the filtered sample blocks may occupy more than one of the output digital sample blocks based on the resampling ratio.
The first example 252 demonstrates a set of filtered sample blocks that are output from the reformattor 68 in a 1:1 resampling ratio as the output digital sample blocks. The first example 252 demonstrates a first output digital sample block 260, a second output digital sample block 261, a third output digital sample block 262, and a fourth output digital sample block 263 that are provided sequentially from the reformattor 68 at a rate of one output digital sample block in every clock cycle in which the DSC system 50 receives a valid input digital sample block. Because the first example 252 corresponds to a 1:1 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 does not discard any of the weighted samples W_SMPL in forming the filtered sample blocks. Therefore, the first example 252 demonstrates a first filtered sample block 264 that corresponds to the first output digital sample block 260, a second filtered sample block 265 that corresponds to the second output digital sample block 261, a third filtered sample block 266 that corresponds to the third output digital sample block 262, and a fourth filtered sample block 267 that corresponds to the fourth output digital sample block 263.
The second example 254 demonstrates a set of filtered sample blocks that are output from the reformattor 68 for a 1:2 resampling ratio as the output digital sample blocks. The second example 254 demonstrates a first output digital sample block 268, a second output digital sample block 269, a third output digital sample block 270, and a fourth output digital sample block 271 that are provided sequentially from the reformattor 68 at a rate of one output digital sample block in every two clock cycles during which the DSC system 50 receives a valid input digital sample block. Because the second example 254 corresponds to a 1:2 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every other weighted sample W_SMPL in forming the filtered sample blocks. However, the reformattor 68 still buffers the same number of digital samples as it would in the first example 252 (e.g., 256 digital samples). Therefore, the second example 254 demonstrates a first filtered sample block 272 and a second filtered sample block 273 that collectively correspond to the first output digital sample block 268, and a third filtered sample block 274 and fourth filtered sample block 275 that collectively correspond to the second output digital sample block 269. Similarly, the second example 254 demonstrates a fifth filtered sample block 276 and a sixth filtered sample block 277 that collectively correspond to the third output digital sample block 270, and a seventh filtered sample block 278 and an eighth filtered sample block 279 that collectively correspond to the fourth output digital sample block 271.
The third example 256 demonstrates a set of filtered sample blocks that are output from the reformattor 68 in a 2:3 resampling ratio as the output digital sample blocks. The third example 256 demonstrates a first output digital sample block 280 and a second output digital sample block 281 that are provided sequentially from the reformattor 68 at a rate of two output digital sample blocks in every three clock cycles during which the DSC system 50 receives a valid input digital sample block. Because the third example 256 corresponds to a 2:3 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every third weighted sample W_SMPL in forming the filtered sample blocks. However, the reformattor 68 still buffers the same number of digital samples as it would in the first example 252 (e.g., 256 digital samples). Therefore, the third example 256 demonstrates a first filtered sample block 282 and a second filtered sample block 283. Because the first filtered sample block 282 has fewer digital samples (e.g., 170 digital samples) than the first output digital sample block 280, the first filtered sample block 282 resides completely in the first output digital sample block 280. However, the second filtered sample block 283 has a first portion (e.g., 86 digital samples) that is in the first output digital sample block 280 and a second portion (e.g., approximately 84 digital samples) that is in the second output digital sample block 281. A third filtered sample block 284 occupies the remainder (e.g., 172 digital samples) of the second output digital sample block 281. Subsequent output digital sample blocks are thus provided from the reformattor 68 similar to the sequential pairs of the first and second output digital sample blocks 280 and 281.
The fourth example 258 demonstrates a set of filtered sample blocks that are output from the reformattor 68 in a 3:4 resampling ratio as the output digital sample blocks. The fourth example 258 demonstrates a first output digital sample block 285, a second output digital sample block 286, and a third output digital sample block 287 that are provided sequentially from the reformattor 68 at a rate of three output digital sample blocks in every four clock cycles during which the DSC system 50 receives a valid input digital sample block. Because the fourth example 258 corresponds to a 3:4 resampling ratio, the reformattor 68 discards every fourth weighted sample W_SMPL in forming the filtered sample blocks. However, the reformattor 68 still buffers the same number of digital samples as it would in the first example 252 (e.g., 256 digital samples).
Therefore, the fourth example 258 demonstrates a first filtered sample block 288 and a second filtered sample block 289. Because the first filtered sample block 288 has fewer digital samples (e.g., 192 digital samples) than the first output digital sample block 285, the first filtered sample block 288 resides completely in the first output digital sample block 285. However, the second filtered sample block 289 has a first portion (e.g., 64 digital samples) that is in the first output digital sample block 285 and a second portion (e.g., 128 digital samples) that is in the second output digital sample block 286. A first portion of a third filtered sample block 290 occupies the remainder (e.g., 128 digital samples) of the second output digital sample block 286, and a second portion (e.g., 64 digital samples) of the third filtered sample block 290 resides in the third output digital sample block 287. An entirety of a fourth filtered sample block 291 occupies the remainder of the third output digital sample block 287. Subsequent output digital sample blocks are thus provided from the reformattor 68 similar to the three sequential output digital sample blocks 285, 286, and 287.
Therefore, the diagram 250 demonstrates that each of the supported input oversampling factors can be accommodated by the DSC system 50 to generate output digital sample blocks R_SMPL each comprising the predetermined fixed number of samples at the predetermined output oversampling factor based on the respective one of supported resampling ratios as identified by the control signal CTRL. The examples 252, 254, 256, and 258 are examples of four different resampling ratios. However, it is to be understood that the reformattor 68, and thus the DSC system 10, is not limited to the four resampling ratios 1:1, 1:2, 2:3, and 3:4 that are represented in the diagram 250. Therefore, additional resampling ratios can be implemented by the DSC system 10 to accommodate a variety of different input oversampling factors while providing output sample blocks at the predetermined fixed output oversampling factor.
The optical modem 300 includes a digital signal processor (DSP) 302 that includes a transmitter system (TX SYSTEM) 304 and a receiver system (RX SYSTEM) 306. As an example, the DSP 302 can be arranged as or arranged as a portion of an integrated circuit (IC). The DSP 302 can receive the digital input signals SIGIN that can be processed by the transmitter system 304 (e.g., modulation and/or signal conditioning) and provided to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 308. The DAC 308 can be configured to convert the processed digital electrical signals SIGIN to analog electrical signals. The analog electrical signals are provided to an optical modulator 310 that is configured to modulate the electrical signals into optical output signals OPTOUT via a laser 312. The optical output signals OPTOUT are thus provided from the optical modem 300 via an optical output 314 (e.g., an optical fiber or laser output).
Similarly, an optical input 316 (e.g., an optical fiber, which can be the same optical fiber as the optical output 314) receives an optical input signal OPTIN. For example, the optical input signal OPTIN can be a dual-polarization optical signal that includes a horizontal polarization and a vertical polarization that are arranged orthogonally with respect to each other. As another example, the optical input signal OPTIN can also be quadrature modulated, such that each of the horizontal polarization component and vertical polarization component can include an in-phase component and a quadrature-phase component. The optical input signal OPTIN can be demodulated via an optical demodulator 324. In the example of
In the example of
In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to
At 358, a set of tap weights (e.g., the tap weights TW) are selected via each of a plurality of tap weights selectors (e.g., the tap weights selectors 62) based on a respective fractional-sample instance value defined by the fractional components of each of the respective plurality of the selection signals. At 360, the respective subset of samples from the digital sample block are filtered via each of a respective plurality of filters (e.g., the filters 66) associated with a filter bank (e.g., the filter bank 16) using the respective tap weights to generate a plurality of weighted samples (e.g., the weighted samples W_SMPL). At 362, the plurality of weighted samples are reformatted to generate a filtered sample block (e.g., one of the filtered sample blocks 260, 272, 282, and 288) based on a selected one of a plurality of supported resampling ratios.
What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the prepended claims. Additionally, where the disclosure or claims recite “a,” “an,” “a first,” or “another” element, or the equivalent thereof, it should be interpreted to include one or more than one such element, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. As used herein, the term “includes” means includes but not limited to, and the term “including” means including but not limited to. The term “based on” means based at least in part on.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7630427 | Banister et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7864080 | Demirsoy et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8249463 | Perkins | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8324949 | Cherkassky et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8428183 | Khatana et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432995 | Parikh et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8565621 | Ibragimov et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8638893 | Dark et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8682180 | Nimon | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8787777 | Goldfarb | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8909068 | Stojanovic | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9036751 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9184834 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9240843 | Malouin et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9621382 | Wang et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9755864 | Ali Shah et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
10587294 | Arabaci | Mar 2020 | B1 |
20060178759 | Breiling | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20120300818 | Metreaud et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130287410 | Leven et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20170214558 | Nazarathy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170372714 | Kovesi et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180254935 | Güntürkün et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Roudas, “Coherent Optical Communication Systems”, WDM Systems and Networks, Optical Networks, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1093-5_10, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012. |
International Search Report from corresponding PCT/US2019/050603 dated Jan. 2, 2020. |
Amendment No. 1 to IP Core Technology Development and License Agreement TG20161121; Aug. 31, 2016; pp. 1-2. |
Exhibit B to IP Core Technology Development and License Agreement No. 20161121; Jul. 31, 2017; pp. 1-12. |
Exhibit C to IP Core Technology Development and License Agreement No. 20161121; Aug. 31, 2017; pp. 1-20. |
IP Core Technology Development and License Agreement No. TG20161121; Dec. 14, 2016; pp. 1-19. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200169278 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16131554 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16774697 | US |