Recently, both computer-to-plate and on-press digital imaging of offset plates have become widely spread. The imaging may be performed by a large number of writing beams to increase the image exposure speed.
A conventional multi-beam scanning apparatus may comprise a rotating drum and a scanning head having a plurality of laser diodes movable parallel to the axis of the drum. An exposure medium, such as an offset plate, may be mounted around the outer peripheral surface of the drum.
The drum may rotate at a fixed rotational speed indicating the fast scanning direction. Concurrently, the scanning head may move at a fixed speed, synchronized with the rotation of the drum in the axial direction of the drum indicating the slow scanning direction. On each rotation of the drum, the scanning head progresses a distance W. W is termed the scanning swath width. As a result of the two movements, each laser diode spirally scans the outer peripheral of the drum, forming a scanning line at an angle α to a direction perpendicular to the axis of the drum.
The resulting image exposed in this helical mode is not rectangular but rather slanted at angle α, forming a parallelogram. The helical angle α is a function of the width W and the drum circumference DC, where
The number of exposure beams N and the resolution R define the scanning swath width as W=N/R, hence α=arctangent [(N/R)/DC]. The helical angle α increases as the number of beams N increases. For example, for 32 beams at a resolution of 2540 dots per inch (100 dots/mm) and a drum circumference of 640 mm, the helical angle is: α=arctangent [(N/R)/DC]=arctangent [(32/100)1640]=0.0005 radians. If the number of beams is increased to 48 beams the helical angle α is increased to 0.00075 radians. In order to ensure the rectangular form of an image exposed in a helical mode, it is necessary to compensate for the deficiency described hereinabove.
Some existing methods for image distortion correction include inclining the scanning head itself at an angle equal to the helical angle, feeding the exposure media at the helical angle or advancing the recording start position for the scanning lines as scanning progresses. These methods may result in a rectangular image, which is inclined with respect to the central axis of the imaging cylinder at an inclination angle α. This solution may be acceptable to some extent for computer-to-plate devices. However, it is generally unacceptable for automated computer-to-press imaging systems.
There is a need to provide a simple and flexible method of image distortion correction that would support the exposure with a varying number of beams and at variable exposure resolutions, without the need to make any mechanical adjustments on the press.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to helical multi-beam scanning apparatus and methods resulting in a rectangular exposed image with its edges parallel to the gripper line. Throughout the specification and claims, whenever one of the terms “marking”, “printing” and “recording” is used, the intention is to any of these terms.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
For example, the procedure for skewing a full size 1000 mm×1000 mm image to be exposed at a resolution of 100 dots per millimeter, with a linear agglomerate array of 100 diodes is as follows: The first thousand pixels of the input scanning line are shifted by one pixel in the slow scanning direction, the second thousand pixels of the input scanning line are shifted by two pixels in the slow scanning direction until the hundredth thousand pixels of the input scanning line are shifted by a hundred pixels in the slow scanning direction.
After calculating a new size for the skewed image and accordingly new coordinates for the origin of the exposure (step 26), the image exposure may be performed according to the new set of coordinates of the pixels (step 28), which may result in a rectangular image having edges parallel to the plate edges and, accordingly, parallel to the paper edges and the gripper line at the time of printing.
The image-skewing method described hereinabove may be applicable to a printing press capable of carrying more than one image on a plate cylinder, for example the 74 Karat press, commercially available from Karat Digital Press BV, Holland or the Heath press, commercially available from Heath Custom Press, Inc. USA. This algorithm is also applicable to duplex printing (two-side printing). Each side may be exposed at different exposure resolutions and with a different number of beams.
Software-based image skewing as described hereinabove is relatively simple and fast for vector-type images such as files in PostScript format. However, it may be time consuming for raster images such as images carrying pictorial information.
Another embodiment of the present invention may treat equally both images in PostScript format (vector) and images in pictorial (continuous tone) format. In this embodiment, each sub-raster input scanning line is divided into sections, which are directed to different output lines. As a consequence, each scanning line is exposed by several laser beams. In a conventional helical mode, when no correction is applied to the image by modifying the pixel coordinates, each sub-raster input scanning line corresponds to an output data line, which is exposed as a whole by one laser beam.
Reference is now made to
W indicates the width of a scanning swath 34, which comprises N beams. W/N is the width of a scanning sub-raster or a single exposure line. The image recording is performed by gradual activation of the recording and/or exposing beams into operation from beam N to beam 1. Each exposing beam is activated at a point where it enables skewed image rectification. Each exposing beam is related to an exposure line that may comprise sections from more than one input line according to the skewed image. The image recording at the last exposure swath is performed in gradual deactivation of the recording and/or exposing beams from N to 1.
Reference is now made to
The length of a section is defined by the minimum amount of pixels exposed in the fast scanning direction (Y), during a shift of one pixel in the slow scanning direction (X). All the sections are of the same length when the vertical resolution equals the horizontal resolution.
In a more general case, however, there is a need to stretch the image in a local non-linear way in order to compensate for mechanical inaccuracies of an exposure drum or irregularities of an exposure table movement. This is achieved by varying the resolution within the same exposure line and hence different segments of the same scanning line may have different resolutions and hence sections of the same scanning line may have different lengths.
In order to determine the lengths of N sections of scanning line ISL(i), the following N+1 formulas are solved:
where Vertical_Resolution is the resolution in the fast scanning direction and Horizontal_Resolution is the resolution in the slow scanning direction. The first formula assumes averaging and/or mapping of the resolution over the number of exposure beams.
The rectangular shape of the exposed image may be achieved by gradually shifting sections of an input line between several exposure lines. When imaging at a variable resolution, the data for one swath of N beams comprise N2 sections from 2N-1 consecutive input scanning lines. 2N-1 input scanning lines may be required for producing one cylinder rotation exposure with N exposure beams performing the compensation for image skewing as will be explained in more detail with respect to
Reference is now made to
The image data to be corrected is initially loaded in swath wide portions into input line divider 56, which will be described in detail with respect to
Divider 56 also provides image exposure data for one of the areas of buffer 58. This exposure data is generated based on input scanning line data ISL(i) 64 and on information from the previous input scanning line ISL(i-1), which is already stored in one the image buffer areas 58A–58C.
Reference is now made to
Each scanning swath may comprise N2 sections. The first input scanning line ISL(1) contributes its N sections only to output lines L1–LN of swath k+1. The second input line of swath k+1 contributes also one section to output line L1 of swath k+2, the third input line of swath k contributes two sections to swath k+2 and so on. The continuity of data within an exposure line in buffer 58 is ensured by a proper matching mechanism. This mechanism seamlessly attaches the head of a section of an input scanning line to the tail of a second section from a different input scanning line or from the same input line, as is described in
Section 82 is marked as Sec (i−1, j−1) and section 84 is marked as Sec (i, j). In this example, the tail is defined as the end of Sec (i−1, j−1) and the head is defined as the beginning of section Sec (i, j). The sections may be stored in the memory in units, which may have a different size than the width of a recording pixel. This may create a need to write and read a single pixel from more than one memory section. Generally, the memory address may be changed in both the i and j directions. In some cases, two consecutive lines should follow each other and only Sec (i−1, j−1) and Sec (i, j) may be seamlessly attached.
Reference is now made to
The continuity of data within an exposure line in buffer 58 is ensured by mask mechanism 72. Mask mechanism 72 is responsible for the attachment of a head of section (i,j) to a tail of section (i−1, j−1) already stored in image buffer 58 as was described in details with respect to
In another embodiment of the present invention, the need for a seamless attachment mechanism may be eliminated. This embodiment may be more convenient to implement from the aspect of memory handling, especially when the input data stream is “block by block” (e.g., compressed data) rather than “line by line” data stream.
Reference is now made to
Apparatus 90 comprises an image buffer 91, a memory register 92 coupled to buffer 91, a barrel shifter 94 coupled to register 92, a down-counter 96 and a right-shift counter 98 coupled to barrel shifter 94. Image buffer 91 comprise at least three areas for storing at least three swaths of data lines. In this example, only two swaths k and k+1 serve for exposure, while a third swath k+2 is filled with new input data. Data from at least 2N−1 consecutive scanning lines of swaths k and k+1 may be provided to memory register 92 having a length of 2N−1 dots. The right cell of register 92 may contain data from section j of exposure line L1 of swath k and the left cell of register 92 contains data from section j of exposure line LN−1 of swath k+1. Shifter 94 right-shifts the data in register 92 according to the skewing angle and the N Least Significant Bit (LSB) dots are allocated to N exposure beams. The shifting size is constant during the imaging of the entire section j and is increased when imaging the next section. The section length is loaded into a down-counter 96 for each new section to be imaged. When the section-length counter reaches its terminal count (TC) (end of section), the size of the shift is incremented by a right-shift counter 98 for the next section.
The illustration shows an image 100 exposed in a helical mode on a cylinder 102. The pixels of a two-dimensional scanning matrix 104 are gradually activated as the width of a first image swath K1 increases along the fast scanning direction Y. In the successive swathes K2 and K3, all the pixels of the two-dimensional scanning matrix are active and the swath width is constant. The last swath KK is characterized by a gradual deactivation of the recording and/or exposing pixels of two-dimensional scanning matrix 104. The resulting image is rectangular and has its edge 106 parallel to a gripper line 108.
It should be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the skewing of an image on a plate according to the present invention may be performed in any direction. Thus, the method and apparatus described hereinabove may be applied to computer-to-plate exposure devices, as well as to on-press imaging and may be adapted to correct cocking caused by a conventional offset press cylinders misalignment or by helical exposure.
It should be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the image rectifying method and apparatus described hereinabove are applicable to all multi beam and/or multi-element digital writing technologies. These may be ink-jet devices writing by an ink jet array, such as, the Idanit 160A ink jet printer, commercially available from Scitex Ltd, of Herzlia, Israel or by wide format inkjet printing machine such as that commercially available from Aprion Ltd, of Herzlia, Israel.
While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
This is a continuation of pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/708,089, filed Nov. 8, 2000, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/197,990, filed Apr. 18, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4575769 | Arnoldi | Mar 1986 | A |
4591880 | Mitsuka | May 1986 | A |
4745487 | Nishikawa | May 1988 | A |
4860651 | Ishii et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4897737 | Shalev | Jan 1990 | A |
5321426 | Baek et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351617 | Williams et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5668588 | Morizumi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040095618 A1 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60197990 | Apr 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09708089 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 10658601 | US |