This disclosure describes a digital to analog converter and more specifically a resistor-based digital to analog converter with multiplexor fastpaths.
Resistor-based digital to analog converters (DACs) are constructed using a string of like size resistors between an upper and lower reference voltage and a set of muxing devices which selectively connect each node within the resistor network to the DAC output as shown in
As the accuracy, or address bit width of DAC 100 increases, so must the number or resistors 105, voltage divider nodes 110 and selection gates 115 (e.g. multiplexers or muxs). DAC 100 has “P” resistors 105, voltage divider nodes 110 and selection gates 115 where P=2N and N is the number of address bits in DAC 100. For example, a 5 bit DAC 100 will have 32 voltage nodes 110 requiring muxing, an 8 bit DAC 100 will have 256 voltage nodes 110, and a 10 bit DAC 100 has 1024 voltage nodes 110. As the number of voltage nodes 110 increases, the load from the mux devices 115 limits the performance of DAC 100. Therefore, a DAC 100 having an N value larger than 5 is impractical for DAC 100.
To provide higher accuracy DACs and/or higher frequency operation, designers employ a mux hierarchy as shown in DAC hierarchy 200 of
In illustrated DAC hierarchy 200, first hierarchy output nodes 230a-230q are selectively connected to 2nd hierarchy output nodes 245a-245r through 2nd hierarchy mux groups 240a-240r. Each 2nd hierarchy mux group contains selection gates or mux devices 235a-235t and 2nd hierarchy output nodes 245a-245r are selectively coupled to the output, DACOUT through 3rd hierarchy mux devices 250a-250r. DAC 200 according to
Addresses 280 are decoded by address decoder 285 to enable connection of the chosen voltage divider node to DACOUT in DAC 200. Decoder 285 contains units 285a, 285b and 285c, each decoding a portion of address 280 to select the 1st hierarchy selection gates, 2nd hierarchy selection gates and 3rd hierarchy selection gates required to complete the path between the voltage divider node and DACOUT. Select signals 290 are provided for connecting the address decoder to the 1st hierarchy select gates (290a), the 2nd hierarchy select gates (290b) and the 3rd hierarchy select gates (Not Shown)
While hierarchical structures of DAC 200 work well for general purpose DACs in which the digital data pattern driving the DAC inputs is random, the delay imposed by the multiple stages of muxing limits the performance in DACs designed for use within successive approximation analog to digital converters (SARADCs). The reference ranging algorithm applied by the SAR demands the ability to switch across major portions of the address space during reset and the first several patterns of the approximation. What is needed is a resistor DAC node selection architecture which allows for both low output capacitance and low output resistance for performance-limiting addresses in order to maximize DAC performance.
A DAC muxing structure having fastpaths is provided. While the majority of DAC voltage divider node selection is provided using a hierarchical mux structure, addresses which commonly limit the performance of the SARADC during reset and in early approximation steps are provided. Using a single selection gate or mux device fastpath from the resistor divider node to the output, DACOUT, limits the output resistance. A small number of nodes are connected to DACOUT through a single device or a small number of devices. As a result, large transients in output node voltages that result from transitioning across a significant portion of the address space in a single step can be accommodated by a low resistance path at the same time the output capacitance of the DAC is significantly reduced by the hierarchical mux design.
The resulting structure provides faster access for the addresses associated with the small number of voltage divider nodes while the adaptations to the known hierarchical multiplexing structure DAC 200 only nominally affect nodal capacitance.
A first embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Select gates 320, 360, 335, 340, and/or 350 may comprise single transistors or a complimentary twisted transistor pair. In general, most voltage divider nodes 310a-310p are connected to DACOUT through a series of selection gates 365 and 340. For example voltage node 310a connects to DACOUT via 360a, 335a and 350a respectively, thereby limiting the capacitance on any voltage node 310.
Nodes selected for fastpath connections are determined with knowledge of the DAC addressing sequences. For instance, addresses associated with the first several approximation cycles in an ADCSAR are good candidates for fastpath connections.
The number of selection gates 360a-360u in a first hierarchy mux group 365a, which connect voltage divider nodes 310a-310c to first hierarchy output node 330a, is reduced from a value represented by P/Q to a value of P/Q-1 to account for the fastpath 375a connection; where P is a any representative integer value for the number of voltage divider nodes 310, and Q is a representative integer value for the number of first hierarchies 330. For example, DAC hierarchy 200 of
In DAC hierarchy 300, fastpaths 375 are implemented for each voltage divider node 310 in which improved DAC hierarchy 300 access is required and the fastpath 375 address uniquely defines respective voltage divider node 310. The number of fastpaths 375 provided in DAC hierarchy 300 is “V”, where “V” may be any integer value desired which is less than 2N but is generally in the range between 3 and 15. Within DAC hierarchy 300, not all first hierarchy mux groups 365 have the same number of selection gates 360 for connecting voltage divider nodes 310 to their respective first hierarchy output nodes 330. For example first hierarchy output node 330q and associated first hierarchy mux group 365w retains the P/Q mux device ratio of DAC hierarchy 200, and each of the P/Q voltage divider nodes 310 associated with first hierarchy mux group 365w is coupled to DACOUT only through the hierarchical mux structures 345r (i.e. no fastpath 375 exists for voltage divider nodes 310m-310p).
In another example, a first hierarchy output node 330 may be reduced in its connection to the resistor array by more than one mux device. As shown in DAC hierarchy 300, the fastpaths 375 couple voltage divider nodes 310 to the final level of address decoder hierarchy and/or DACOUT through a single analog select gate 370. One skilled in the art would recognize that the number of reduced first hierarchy mux groups 365a-365v versus the number of first hierarchy mux groups 225 (
To operate DAC hierarchy 300, the address decode 385 is adapted to recognize fastpath 375 addresses and enable only a single selection gate 370 connecting the addressed voltage divider node 310 to DACOUT. Address decode subunits 385a, 385b and 385c function to decode address 380 to generate and select 1st, 2nd and 3rd hierarchy selection signals 390a, 390b and 390c when a non-fastpath address is provided. Address decoder 385 further comprises subunit 385d for recognition of a fastpath address provided at address 380 and generation of fastpath selection signals 390d for operating fastpath selection gates 370. Recognition of the fastpath address may further prevent selection of any of gates 360 which connect additional voltage divider nodes 310 of the resistor array to each of the first hierarchy output nodes 330 as is a typical problem in DAC hierarchy 200. In DAC hierarchy 200 only a subset of the address bits control the decode of multiplexer select gates 220 for any single level of hierarchy 230. The fastpath decode of DAC hierarchy 300 therefore limits the amount of power consumed by DAC hierarchy 300 during a fastpath 375 access. The address decode further enables multiple series switches for non-fastpath voltage divider nodes using subsets of address bits to decode the multiplexer selection 360 at each level of hierarchy 330 and 345.
While DAC hierarchy 300 illustrates fastpaths 375, which connect voltage divider nodes 310 to DACOUT through only a single select gate 370, it is also conceivable that fastpaths can connect voltage divider nodes 310 to an intermediate level of hierarchy prior to DACOUT; for example, voltage divider node 310d connect to hierarchy level 345 instead of DACOUT (see
An alternate embodiment, DAC hierarchy 500, is shown in
A fourth embodiment is shown in DAC hierarchy 800 of
Design flow 900 may vary depending on the type of representation being designed. For example, a design flow 900 for building an application specific IC (ASIC) may differ from a design flow 900 for designing a standard component or from a design flow 900 for instantiating the design into a programmable array, for example a programmable gate array (PGA) or a field programmable gate array (FPGA) offered by Altera® Inc. or Xilinx® Inc.
Design process 910 preferably employs and incorporates hardware and/or software modules for synthesizing, translating, or otherwise processing a design/simulation functional equivalent of the components, circuits, devices, or logic structures shown in
Design process 910 may include hardware and software modules for processing a variety of input data structure types including netlist 980. Such data structure types may reside, for example, within library elements 930 and include a set of commonly used elements, circuits, and devices, including models, layouts, and symbolic representations, for a given manufacturing technology (e.g., different technology nodes, 32 nm, 45 nm, 90 nm, etc.). The data structure types may further include design specifications 940, characterization data 950, verification data 960, design rules 970, and test data files 985 which may include input test patterns, output test results, and other testing information. Design process 910 may further include, for example, standard mechanical design processes such as stress analysis, thermal analysis, mechanical event simulation, process simulation for operations such as casting, molding, and die press forming, etc. One of ordinary skill in the art of mechanical design can appreciate the extent of possible mechanical design tools and applications used in design process 910 without deviating from the scope and spirit of the invention. Design process 910 may also include modules for performing standard circuit design processes such as timing analysis, verification, design rule checking, place and route operations, etc.
Design process 910 employs and incorporates logic and physical design tools such as HDL compilers and simulation model build tools to process design structure 920 together with some or all of the depicted supporting data structures along with any additional mechanical design or data (if applicable), to generate a second design structure 990. Design structure 990 resides on a storage medium or programmable gate array in a data format used for the exchange of data of mechanical devices and structures (e.g. information stored in a IGES, DXF, Parasolid XT, JT, DRG, or any other suitable format for storing or rendering such mechanical design structures). Similar to design structure 920, design structure 990 preferably comprises one or more files, data structures, or other computer-encoded data or instructions that reside on transmission or data storage media and that when processed by an ECAD system generate a logically or otherwise functionally equivalent form of one or more of the embodiments of the invention shown in
Design structure 990 may also employ a data format used for the exchange of layout data of integrated circuits and/or symbolic data format (e.g. information stored in a GDSII (GDS2), GL1, OASIS, map files, or any other suitable format for storing such design data structures). Design structure 990 may comprise information such as, for example, symbolic data, map files, test data files, design content files, manufacturing data, layout parameters, wires, levels of metal, vias, shapes, data for routing through the manufacturing line, and any other data required by a manufacturer or other designer/developer to produce a device or structure as described above and shown in
The above description and drawings are only to be considered illustrative of exemplary embodiments, which achieve the features and advantages of the invention. It should be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that modification and substitutions to the DAC embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be considered as being limited by the foregoing description and drawings.
This Patent Application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/962,276 filed on Dec. 21, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,710,302; titled, “HIGH SPEED RESISTOR-BASED DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER (DAC) ARCHITECTURE”; assigned to the present assignee and is herein incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3581303 | Kelly | May 1971 | A |
| 3646587 | Shaffstall et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3877021 | Raamot | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4415881 | Lechner et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 5045832 | Tam | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5059978 | Valdenaire | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5495245 | Ashe | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5568147 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5604501 | McPartland | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5648780 | Neidorff | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5703588 | Rivoir et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5940020 | Ho | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5969658 | Naylor | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977897 | Barnes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5977898 | Ling et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999115 | Connell et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6037889 | Knee | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6054884 | Lye | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6163288 | Yoshizawa | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166672 | Park | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169510 | Bult et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181265 | Lee | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6204789 | Nagata | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6225929 | Beck | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6278393 | Lopata et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6388599 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6407692 | Bult et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414616 | Dempsey | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6433717 | Leung | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6529152 | Piasecki et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6570520 | Ishii | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6621440 | Gorman | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6642877 | Leung | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650267 | Bult et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6724336 | Leung et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6782499 | Osada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6885328 | Kao et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6914547 | Swaroop et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6914574 | Fourdeux et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6922046 | Liu et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6954165 | Mallinson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6958720 | Prater | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6975261 | Isham | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6995701 | Churchill et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7136002 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7190298 | Mulder | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7250891 | Nishimura | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7304596 | Lin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7397407 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7414561 | Brubaker | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7420496 | Kim et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7453385 | Hino | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7532142 | Voegeli et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 20010038351 | Brunolli et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020030620 | Cairns et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121995 | Tabler | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186231 | Kudo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20090160690 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090290632 | Wegener | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090160691 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11962276 | Dec 2007 | US |
| Child | 12389618 | US |