The invention relates to Internet communication and more particularly to using digital watermarks to as control elements in Internet communication.
The Internet presents security challenges to corporations and others who have computers which store confidential information and which have connections to the internet. Traditionally, documents containing confidential information are marked with a legend or other visual indicia with words such a “CONFIDENTIAL”, “PROPRIETARY”, etc. The presence of these marks alerts anyone handling such documents that they should only be transferred outside of company under special precautions. It is relatively difficult and unusual for someone to inadvertently manually send such a document to an unauthorized receiver. However, the use of Internet communication changes the situation.
The Internet and electronic mail speeds the communications process; however, the Internet and electronic mail also make it much easier to inadvertently or accidentally send a confidential document to an unauthorized receiver. A single accidental or inadvertent keystroke can have wide ranging unintended consequences. The Internet and other electronic communication system make it easy to communicate; however, these systems and networks also make it easy to mistakenly or inadvertently sent a document to the wrong party.
The invention utilizes digital watermarks to control the transmission and/or receipt of documents, including images or audio, transmitted over computer networks such as the Internet. The invention can be used to prevent the accidental dissemination of information to unauthorized receivers. Furthermore, while no security system is fool-proof, the invention helps guards against the intentional, but unauthorized, dissemination of information to unauthorized receivers.
Most electronically transmitted messages contain text. However, electronic mail systems generally allow images (i.e. pictures) or sound bites to be embedded into and form part of a message. For example, a message can contain a “stamp” with the word “confidential” or a message can contain a sound clip with the word “confidential”. An image or sound clip that forms part of an electronic message can carry a digital watermark that can be detected and read by conventional watermark reading programs.
The “payload” or digital data in a digital watermark typically has a number of different fields. One or more of these fields can be dedicated to a flags which indicates that the document or image containing the watermark is confidential or otherwise classified and that it should only be disseminated in a particular manor.
Typically, e-mail enters a transmission network by way of an e-mail server. Programs that can detect and read watermarks are well known and commercially available. In one embodiment, the e-mail server passes each e-mail messages through a watermark detection and reading program prior to sending the message out over a network. If the watermark program detects a watermark, it interrogates certain flag bits to determine how the message should be handled. For example, if the watermark reading program finds that a particular flag is set, it can take action such as alerting both the sender and a network administrator. If the watermark program finds no watermark or finds that a particular flag is not set, the message is sent over the network in a conventional manner.
Thus, the invention can serve as a control mechanism for controlling the dissemination and receipt of electronic messages.
Messages and documents also enter the Internet and other electronic networks from servers such as Web servers and FTP servers. In a similar fashion a watermark detection program can interrogate documents on servers such as Web and FTP servers and take action as described above.
The embodiments of the invention described herein relate to systems for transmitting e-mail messages over the Internet. This first embodiment has the ability to prevent the accidental dissemination of confidential e-mail messages and documents to unauthorized users. That is, the first embodiment of the invention prevents the transmission of confidential e-mail or documents to anyone. An alternate embodiment merely prevents the transmission of confidential documents to “unauthorized” users. That is, if a message is sent to two recipients, one of whom is authorized and one of whom is not authorized, the documents are transmitted to authorized user and not transmitted to unauthorized user. It is very easy to add addressees to an e-mail message. Someone may address an e-mail message which contains confidential information to a large group of people without realizing the one of the addressee is not authorized to receive confidential information. The system will prevent such an e-mail from being transmitted to the unauthorized person even though the sender included the address of that person in the list of addressee. Another alternative embodiment can take a variety of actions such as logging messages or sending them to an administrator in addition to preventing them from being disseminated.
A typical confidential document 10 is represented in
The data fields and flags in a typical watermark payload are shown in
A second embodiment of the invention provides for a wider array of alternative. As shown in
It should be clearly noted that the above is merely a simplified example of the rules and combinations that could be in data base 401. The data bases could include hundreds or thousands of users and it could include dozens of rules. The system can be complex or simple as desired for a particular application. A system can include many alternatives in addition to those shown above or a system might include only a very few alternatives. For example, the system could include only a list of addresses which are authorized to receive messages which have a confidentiality flag set to “confidential”. Such a system would allow confidential documents to be only sent to selected addresses. Alternatively or in addition the system could include a list of individuals authorized to send confidential documents. The system could merely check the sender against this list or alternatively, the system could require that a password be entered when such messages are encountered. The table above shows three flag bits. A system could have more or less flag bits as the needs of the particular system require.
The import point is that the system considers the message sender, the message recipient and the condition of the flags in the data carried by a digital watermark to determine what action should be taken. The digital watermark can be carried by the message using any of the known ways of watermarking a document. For example, it can be carried by modulating the width of lines or by modulating the luminosity of pixels in an image or by a watermark in audio data.
In alternate embodiments of the invention, the confidentiality stamp could include a watermark in an image by means other than using line width modulation as described with respect to the first embodiment of the invention. The background of the stamp could include a conventional image carrying a conventional watermark.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, rather than checking for a digital watermark, the system could check for a text string such as “confidential” and take action in response to locating such a text string.
The above described embodiments relate to controlling the dissemination of information; however, it should be understood that the invention could be applied in similar manner to control the receipt of confidential information or to control the action taken when messages containing watermarks are received.
While the previously described embodiments apply to e-mail systems, similar precautions could be taken with FTP servers or with Web servers.
While the invention has been shown and described with respect to various preferred embodiments, it should be understood that various changes in form and detail could be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/784,391, filed Feb. 15, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,298,864), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/183,681, filed Feb. 19, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5710834 | Rhoads | Jan 1998 | A |
5822436 | Rhoads | Oct 1998 | A |
5832119 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5838458 | Tsai | Nov 1998 | A |
5841886 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5841978 | Rhoads | Nov 1998 | A |
5862260 | Rhoads | Jan 1999 | A |
5943422 | Van Wie et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958005 | Thorne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6122403 | Rhoads | Sep 2000 | A |
6141753 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6229924 | Rhoads et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243480 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6307949 | Rhoads | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311214 | Rhoads | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332031 | Rhoads et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6381341 | Rhoads | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385329 | Sharma et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408082 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421070 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424725 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427020 | Rhoads | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6516079 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522770 | Seder et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535617 | Hannigan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542927 | Rhoads | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553129 | Rhoads | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567533 | Rhoads | May 2003 | B1 |
6580808 | Rhoads | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590996 | Reed et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611607 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614914 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615348 | Gibbs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636615 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647128 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647130 | Rhoads | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650761 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6681028 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681029 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694042 | Seder et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694043 | Seder et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700990 | Rhoads | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6700995 | Reed | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704869 | Rhoads et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718046 | Reed et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718047 | Rhoads | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721440 | Reed et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728390 | Rhoads et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744906 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760463 | Rhoads | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763123 | Reed et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768809 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775392 | Rhoads | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798894 | Rhoads | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6813366 | Rhoads | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6868498 | Katsikas | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879701 | Rhoads | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6917724 | Seder et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920232 | Rhoads | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922480 | Rhoads | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6947571 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6975746 | Davis et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988202 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996252 | Reed et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000186 | Gropper et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003731 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7024016 | Rhoads et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027614 | Reed | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035427 | Rhoads | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044395 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7051086 | Rhoads et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054465 | Rhoads | May 2006 | B2 |
7062069 | Rhoads | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7095871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111170 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113614 | Rhoads | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139408 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7158654 | Rhoads | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164780 | Brundage et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171016 | Rhoads | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171020 | Rhoads et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174031 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177443 | Rhoads | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7213757 | Jones et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224819 | Levy et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7248717 | Rhoads | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261612 | Hannigan et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7298864 | Jones | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305104 | Carr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308110 | Rhoads | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313251 | Rhoads | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319775 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330564 | Brundage et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7369678 | Rhoads | May 2008 | B2 |
7377421 | Rhoads | May 2008 | B2 |
7391880 | Reed et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400743 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406214 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7424131 | Alattar et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427030 | Jones et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433491 | Rhoads | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444000 | Rhoads | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444392 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450734 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460726 | Levy et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466840 | Rhoads | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486799 | Rhoads | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499566 | Rhoads | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502759 | Hannigan et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508955 | Carr et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515733 | Rhoads | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536034 | Rhoads et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7537170 | Reed et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545952 | Brundage et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564992 | Rhoads | Jul 2009 | B2 |
RE40919 | Rhoads | Sep 2009 | E |
7602978 | Levy et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628320 | Rhoads | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643649 | Davis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650009 | Rhoads | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653210 | Rhoads | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657058 | Sharma | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685426 | Ramos et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693300 | Reed et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697719 | Rhoads | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711143 | Rhoads | May 2010 | B2 |
7738673 | Reed | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747038 | Rhoads | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751588 | Rhoads | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7751596 | Rhoads | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756290 | Rhoads | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756892 | Levy | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760905 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762468 | Reed et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787653 | Rhoads | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792325 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7822225 | Alattar | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837094 | Rhoads | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010005837 | Kojo | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010018742 | Hirai | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010026377 | Ikegami | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034705 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055407 | Rhoads | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056468 | Okayasu et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020009208 | Alattar et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020131076 | Davis | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020176003 | Seder et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186886 | Rhoads | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196272 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023682 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040957 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030105730 | Davis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130954 | Carr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040005093 | Rhoads | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040190750 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040240704 | Reed | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264733 | Rhoads et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050041835 | Reed et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058318 | Rhoads | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050192933 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013435 | Rhoads | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041591 | Rhoads | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060251291 | Rhoads | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070055884 | Rhoads | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070108287 | Davis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070154064 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070276841 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276928 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080121728 | Rodriguez | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133555 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080292134 | Sharma et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012944 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090116687 | Rhoads et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125475 | Rhoads et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129627 | Levy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090232352 | Carr et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090286572 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290754 | Rhoads | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100027837 | Levy et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045816 | Rhoads | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054529 | Rhoads | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100062819 | Hannigan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094639 | Rhoads | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100142749 | Ellingson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172540 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198941 | Rhoads | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100296526 | Rhoads | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110007936 | Rhoads | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0375138 | Jun 1990 | EP |
1 063 833 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1193925 | Apr 2002 | EP |
2000-057327 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003-092605 | Mar 2003 | JP |
WO9743736 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9957623 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0227617 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080082618 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60183681 | Feb 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09784391 | Feb 2001 | US |
Child | 11943361 | US |