This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/977,882, filed on Oct. 5, 2007, entitled “ADJACENT OR LATERAL DILATOR AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME,” the contents of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Generally speaking, sequential dilation systems enable a surgeon to make an initial incision and gradually increase the size of the incision by sequential insertion of increasingly larger dilators. Sequential dilation is preferably able to reduce tissue damage and associated trauma to speed patient recovery time. In addition, dilation is utilized to prepare a surgical path to a surgical site and a stimulator may be utilized with the dilator to direct the dilator along a path that avoids specific areas of the patient's anatomy, such as neural elements or nerves.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention relates generally to minimally invasive surgical procedures and apparatus and, more particularly, to a dilation system and related methods for directional dilation of an incision for use in creating an access opening to a patient's spine. More specifically, the present invention relates to a dilation system and related methods that are able to laterally access a lumbar region of a patient's spine through the patient's psoas muscle. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the neural elements or nerves of the psoas muscle are preferably mapped using a stimulating probe, thereby defining a safe zone of passage. The stimulating probe is inserted through the psoas muscle and toward or into the intervertebral disc space. Directional dilators may be used to dilate the psoas muscle to substantially separate tissue on only one side of the stimulating probe. That is, directional, sequential dilators may be inserted to dilate the psoas muscle, for example, on the anterior side of the stimulating probe while substantially leaving the psoas muscle intact on the posterior side of the stimulating probe. Specifically, the directional, sequential dilators may be utilized to directionally dilate tissue away from a neural element or nerve in the patient's body that is identified by the stimulating probe such that the neural element or nerve is not disturbed or damaged by the dilation process or other surgical procedures that may occur following dilation.
Alternatively, the dilation system and method may include a blunt stimulating dilator including at least one channel formed in an outer surface. The channel receives a stimulating probe that is used to map the neural elements or nerves of the psoas muscle and define a safe zone of passage to the patient's spine. The stimulating dilator is inserted through the psoas muscle and toward or into the intervertebral disc space. A stimulating probe is then inserted into the channel formed in the outer surface of the stimulating dilator in order to verify the neural elements or nerves.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the application, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purposes of illustrating the dilation system and methods of the present application, there is shown in the drawings preferred embodiments. It should be understood, however, that the application is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “right”, “left”, “top” and “bottom” designate directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the directional sequential and blunt stimulating dilation systems and designated parts thereof. The words, “anterior”, “posterior”, “superior”, “inferior” and related words and/or phrases designate preferred positions and orientations in the human body to which reference is made and are not meant to be limiting. The terminology includes the above-listed words, derivatives thereof and words of similar import.
Certain exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings. In general, such embodiments relate to dilation systems for accessing a patient's spinal column and, preferably, for laterally accessing the lumbar region of the patient's spine.
As generally understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the dilation systems will be described in connection with accessing the spine to perform a surgical procedure, but the dilation systems will find use not only in orthopedic surgery, but in other surgical procedures in which a surgeon wishes to gain access to an internal cavity by cutting the skin and going through the body wall in order to keep the incision spread apart so that surgical instruments can be inserted. For example, the dilation systems may be used for anteriorly or posteriorly accessing the spine, for accessing the thoracic or cervical region of the spine, or for accessing nearly any other part of the body.
Referring to
The neural elements or nerves 9 of the psoas muscle 4 are preferably mapped using a stimulating probe 20. In this manner, the most posterior neural or nerve free area of the psoas muscle 4 is preferably located and identified. The stimulating probe 20 may then be inserted through the psoas muscle 4 via the most posterior neural or nerve free tissue area or through nearly any other region that is free of neural elements or nerves 9 and toward the spine 2 or into the intervertebral disc space 6 in order to initiate safe tissue separation of the psoas muscle 4. Directional dilators 30, 40 in accordance with the first preferred embodiment of the present invention may be used to dilate the muscle separation. In particular, the directional dilators 30, 40 may be used to primarily separate tissue on one side of the stimulating probe 20 (shown as cranial side), preferably on the anterior side of the stimulating probe 20 (e.g., the safe zone as initially identified and marked by the stimulating probe 20). That is, by using the directional sequential dilators 30, 40, the tissue on one side of the stimulating probe 20 may be moved while substantially limiting movement of the tissue on the opposite side of the stimulating probe 20. In comparison, concentric dilators separate the muscle radially and, as such, dilate tissue on both sides of the stimulating probe. This in turn may impinge on neural elements or nerves 9 located outside of the safe zone.
Referring to
Similarly, the second directional dilator 40 preferably includes a second longitudinal axis 41, an outer surface 42, a proximal end 43, a distal end 44 and a second bore 45 extending from the proximal end 43 to the distal end 44. The second bore 45 preferably has a second bore axis 46 that extends from the proximal end 43 to the distal end 44. The second directional dilator 40 also preferably includes a second tip 40a at the distal end 44 through which the second longitudinal axis 41 extends. The second bore axis 46 of the second bore 45 is offset or located a second offset distance B from the second longitudinal axis 41. The outer surfaces 32, 42 of the first and second directional dilators 30, 40 are preferably coated to prevent electrical leakage during use, as will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art. The second directional dilator 40 also preferably includes a second channel 48 formed in the outer surface 42 thereof that is in communication with the second bore 45. In use, the second bore 45 and the second channel 48 receive the first directional dilator 30 therein in the assembled configuration (e.g., when the first directional dilator 30 is slidably received within the second bore 45 of the second directional dilator 40). The first longitudinal axis 31 of the first directional dilator 30 is preferably coaxial with the second bore axis 46 of the second directional dilator 40 when in the assembled configuration.
Because the first and second bore axes 36, 46 of the first and second bores 35, 45 are offset from the first and second longitudinal axes 31, 41 of the first and second directional dilators 30, 40, respectively, inserting the first directional dilator 30 over the stimulating probe 20 and then the second directional dilator 40 over the first directional dilator 30 causes each sequential dilator to “directionally” dilate the opening formed in the patient preferably away from any neural elements, nerves 9 or other anatomic structure on the opposite side of the stimulating probe 20, as will be described in greater detail below.
Moreover, incorporation of the first and second channels 38, 48 enables the first and second directional dilators 30, 40 to be more closely nested together and thus, substantially eliminate the “cookie cutter” effect that is realized when using multiple concentric dilators of increasing inner bore size.
The first directional dilator 30 preferably includes a plurality of first depth indicators 37 located on the outer surface 32 thereof (as best shown in
In addition, the first and second directional dilators, 30, 40 preferably include first and second grips 39, 49, respectively, located at the proximal ends 32, 42 thereof to better enable the surgeon to grip the dilators 30, 40 in use. The first and second grips 39, 49 may be utilized by the surgeon during insertion, removal, twisting or otherwise manipulating the first and second directional dilators 30, 40 during surgery.
As best shown in
A method of using the stimulating probe 20 and first and second directional dilators 30, 40 will now be described for accessing the patient's spine 2. The technique may be particularly desirable for accessing the lumbar region of the spine 2 via a lateral approach, although a similar or the same method may be used in other parts of the patient's body.
Using the stimulating probe 20 and a triggered electromyograph (EMG) 50, the surgeon preferably maps a safe zone, i.e., a zone generally free of any neural elements or nerves 9, on the tissue of interest (e.g., psoas muscle 4). For example, on the psoas muscle 4, the anterior third of the psoas muscle 4 is generally considered a safe zone.
Once a safe zone is established, anatomical placement is preferably confirmed via intra-operative fluoroscopy. The surgeon inserts the stimulating probe 20 through the psoas muscle 4 toward the patient's spine 2. If the surgery is being performed on the intervertebral disc space 6, the distal end of the stimulating probe 20 may be inserted into the annulus of the desired intervertebral disc space 6. Preferably, the stimulating probe 20 will be inserted via the most posterior portion of the safe zone.
The surgeon can insert or slide the first directional dilator 30 over the stimulating probe 20 so that the first longitudinal axis 31 is located to one side of the stimulating probe 20, preferably away from a sensed neural element or nerve 9, through the psoas muscle 4 and into a position proximate the patient's spine 2. The surgeon can then insert the second directional dilator 40, if necessary, to further dilate the tissue proximate the outside surface 32 of the first directional dilator 30 and further away from the sensed neural element or nerve 9. The surgeon can repeat this process as often as necessary. Finally, if desired, a retractor 60 can be inserted over the second directional dilator 40 to subsequently retract the tissue and to permit removal of the first and second directional dilators 30, 40 and the stimulating probe 20. Alternatively, a working cannula (not shown) may be inserted over the second dilator 40 such that a procedure on the spine 2 may be performed through the working cannula.
Additionally, if desired, before inserting the second directional dilator 40, the stimulating probe 20 can be removed from the first bore 35 and the dilator/probe combination rotated. Thereafter, using the triggered EMG stimulation 50, the surgeon can verify that the nerve root 9 is located at the expected side of the first directional dilator 30, preferably opposite the first channel 38. The stimulating probe 20 is preferably re-inserted into the first bore 35, before insertion of the second directional dilator 40.
By using the first and second directional dilators 30, 40, as compared to concentric sequential dilators as are generally known to those having skill in the art, the directional sequential dilation system 10 preferably ensures that the access opening is created away from the neural elements or nerves 9 of the psoas muscle 4, thus avoiding any neural elements or nerves 9 that may, for example, be located on the posterior side of the stimulating probe 20. Moreover, the directional sequential dilation system 10 also reduces the amount of tissue damage when separating the tissue by minimizing the amount of tissue separation.
Alternatively, as shown in
The stimulating dilator 100 offers the surgeon the ability to simultaneously stimulate and dilate the psoas muscle 4. After placing the tip 112 of the stimulating dilator 100 into the disc space, the stimulating probe 20 can be inserted through the channel 114 along the outer surface 102 of the dilator 100 to stimulate the periphery of the dilated tissue.
Alternatively, as shown in
A method of using the blunt stimulating dilation system will now be described to produce access to the spine 2, in particular to provide an access opening through the psoas muscle 4 in the lumbar region of the spine 2 via a lateral approach. Although as will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the method may be used in other parts of the body and utilizing alternative approaches.
In use, a surgeon inserts, preferably laterally, the blunt stimulating dilator 100, 100′ into the psoas 4 muscle via, for example, a twisting motion. The surgeon preferably uses a triggered EMG 50 to transmit an electrical pulse into the blunt stimulating dilator 100, 100′ in order to locate a safe zone in the patient's psoas muscle 4 by locating nerve roots 9. Once the location of any nerve root 9 has been confirmed to be posterior to the blunt stimulating dilator 100, 100′, the surgeon can laterally insert the blunt stimulating dilator 100, 100′ through the psoas muscle 4 and toward the patient's spine 2, preferably into the annulus of the disc space 6. The surgeon inserts or slides the stimulating probe 20 into the channel 114 formed in the outer surface 102 of the blunt stimulating dilator 100, 100′. If desired, the surgeon rotates the blunt stimulating dilator 100 with the stimulating probe 20 located in the channel 114 while using the EMG 50 to verify the location of the nerve root 9. Alternatively, in connection with the four channel blunt stimulating dilator 100′, rotation of the blunt stimulating dilator 100 is not required. Rather, the stimulating probe 20 can be independently inserted into each channel 114a-d to verify the location of the nerve root 9. The surgeon can then, if desired, insert a retractor over the stimulating dilator 100, 100′.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the accompanying claims. In particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be used with many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, materials, and components and otherwise, used in the practice of the invention, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the principles of the present invention. In addition, features described herein may be used singularly or in combination with other features. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, and not limited to the foregoing description.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/078927 | 10/6/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/5/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/046414 | 4/9/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2878701 | Weersma | Mar 1959 | A |
3698391 | Mahony | Oct 1972 | A |
4449532 | Storz | May 1984 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
5071410 | Pazell | Dec 1991 | A |
5120318 | Nallapareddy | Jun 1992 | A |
5129906 | Ross et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152765 | Ross et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158543 | Lazarus | Oct 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5241972 | Bonati | Sep 1993 | A |
5242443 | Kambin | Sep 1993 | A |
5357983 | Mathews | Oct 1994 | A |
5395317 | Kambin | Mar 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
5496322 | Mathews | Mar 1996 | A |
5520609 | Moll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5545228 | Kambin | Aug 1996 | A |
5569248 | Mathews | Oct 1996 | A |
5575176 | Rohrs et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580344 | Hasson | Dec 1996 | A |
5584887 | Kambin | Dec 1996 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5762629 | Kambin | Jun 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5902231 | Foley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5964761 | Kambin | Oct 1999 | A |
5967970 | Cowan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6099547 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162170 | Foley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175758 | Kambin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6336914 | Gillespie, III | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360750 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6520907 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6575899 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575979 | Cragg | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575987 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589225 | Orth et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589262 | Honebrink et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6637435 | Ciaglia et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6679833 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6793656 | Mathews | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7008431 | Simonson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7079883 | Marino et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7305989 | Gostelow | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020035373 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20040059339 | Roehm, III et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093001 | Hamada | May 2004 | A1 |
20040138662 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143265 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147928 | Landry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172022 | Landry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050256525 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004398 | Binder et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060195017 | Shluzas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247651 | Roehm et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070066977 | Assell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070198062 | Miles et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 340 467 | Mar 2003 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Jan. 14, 2009. |
Adam Schreiber, M.D., “Does Percutaneous Nucleotomy With Discoscopy Replace Conventional Discectomy?” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, (1989). |
A. Schreiber, MD., “Percutaneous Nucleotomy: Technique With Discoscopy” Orthopedics (1991). |
Hallett H. Mathews, MD., “Percutaneous Interbody Fusions” Spinal Fusion (1998). |
Takatomo Moro, MD et al., “An Anatomic Study of the Lumbar Plexus with Respect to Retroperitoneal Endoscopic Surgery” SPINE vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 423-428, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110208226 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |