The present invention relates to aerosol foam dispenser that dispenses, particularly an aerosol dip tube foam dispenser with an ergonomic actuator such that it is optimized for in-shower use with shampoos, hair conditioners, and body washes.
Many consumers prefer using beauty products in a foam form. Foaming styling products including mousses and foaming hand soaps are common. However, there are few acceptable foaming in-shower products such as shampoos, hair conditioners, and body washes. One reason is that it is difficult to design a foam dispenser that is easy to use in the shower and dispenses a high-quality foam for the entire life of the product.
Single chamber aerosols can be advantageous to dispense foaming products over dual compartment aerosols (such as piston or bag-in-can or bag-on-valve) due to their lower manufacturing, packing, and filling costs and reduced complexity. Among single chamber aerosols, upright pump style dip tube aerosols are generally preferred by consumers over inverted cans for in-shower dispensing of foam products. One of the reasons is that in inverted aerosols the orifice is substantially aligned to the can axis, this can be messy because when the foam is dispensed into the palm, it sticks to the dispenser. Additionally, the consumer has limited visual contact with the dispensed foam in her palm because the device is positioned between her eyes and her palm. This lack of visual contact can prevent the consumer from perceiving and controlling the desired amount to be dispensed and can cause odd dispensing ergonomics.
While preferred, many current upright dip tube aerosols foam dispensers also have challenges as they can require a stable surface for easy dispensing. However, Consumers generally do not have a convenient and/or stable surface in the shower to dispense foam products, since they store their products on the edge of a bathtub or in shower caddies suspended on tension poles or over the showerhead. Therefore, in the shower, consumers only have one hand to activate the actuator and hold the dispenser because they need to dispense the foam into the open palm of the opposite hand or into sponge, shower puff, loofa, wash cloth or other cleaning implement that is held in the opposite hand.
Furthermore, consumers often tilt foam dispensers, so the product dispenses into her flat palm, so the foam doesn't drop to the shower floor. However, when aerosol dip tube dispensers are actuated at an angle, the dip tube can draw propellant directly from the headspace thus causing the product to degass (i.e. the propellant trapped in the concentrate will gradually move to the headspace to set to a new equilibrium). Degassing can cause irreversible changes in the dispensing and foaming characteristics. If degassing events occur repeatedly, consumers may notice that it is difficult or impossible to dispense the product and if the product is dispensed it is a watery mess, instead of a rich high-quality foam.
As such, there remains a need for a dip tube aerosol dispenser that is ergonomically designed so it can be operated with one hand and intuitively dispensed upright to minimize degassing.
An aerosol dispenser with an axis of symmetry comprising: (a) a pressurizable outer container for storing a propellant and a composition under pressure; (b) an actuator having an outer surface where the actuator is attached to a top of the outer container comprising: (i) a valve being movable to an open position to release a mixture of the aerosol and the composition; (ii) a trigger located above the valve for actuating the valve where the trigger has a direction of actuation from about −10° to about 60° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser at the beginning of a stroke; (iii) a longitudinally extending nozzle having a top surface, a bottom surface, a nozzle surface comprising one or more shaping orifices with a nozzle direction from less than or equal to 85° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser; wherein said orifices are in fluid communication with the valve; wherein the bottom surface and the outer surface of the actuator create an overhang adapted for receiving the at least a portion of a little finger on a user's receiving hand; wherein the overhang is shaped to accommodate a semi-cylinder with a radius from about 10 mm to about 30 mm; (iv) a dip tube where an end of the dip tube is connected to the valve.
An aerosol dispenser with an axis of symmetry comprising: (a) a pressurizable outer container for storing a propellant and a composition under pressure; (b) an actuator having an outer surface where the actuator is attached to a top of the outer container comprising: (i) a valve being movable to an open position to release a mixture of the aerosol and the composition; (ii) a trigger located above the valve for actuating the valve where the trigger has a direction of actuation from about −10° to about 60° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser at the beginning of a stroke; (iii) a longitudinally extending nozzle having a top surface, a bottom surface, a nozzle surface comprising one or more shaping orifices with a nozzle direction less than 100° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser; wherein the bottom surface and the outer surface of the actuator create an overhang adapted for receiving the at least a portion of a little finger on a user's receiving hand; wherein the overhang is shaped to accommodate a semi-cylinder with a radius greater than 20 mm; (iv) a dip tube where an end of the dip tube is connected to the valve.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter of the present invention, it is believed that the invention can be more readily understood from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the invention, it is believed that the present disclosure will be better understood from the following description.
Many consumers want shampoo, conditioner, and/or body wash dispensed as an aerosol foam. Some consumers think these products are easier to use and spread more easily across the body, hair, and/or scalp, which can ultimately enhance the user's experience and lead to better cleaning and/or conditioning results. However, there are few acceptable foaming in-shower products, especially in aerosol dip tube dispensers.
It can be hard to design an aerosol dip tube dispenser that is easy to use and dispenses a creamy, high-quality foam across the entire life of the product. First, in the shower consumers generally only have one hand to activate the actuator and hold the dispenser and thus the dispenser can be operable with one hand. Further, aerosol containers are not ergonomically designed to allow people to easily and intuitively dispense the foam in an upright position into a flat palm and when a dip tube container is actuated at an angle, it will eventually degas, causes irreversible changes in the dispensing and foaming characteristics.
It was found that if during dispensing the dip tube aerosol dispenser had a 98% ile (98th percentile) tilt angle of 90° relative to an axis perpendicular to the ground or less during dispensing, the aerosol dispenser was less likely to degas. The propensity to tilt a pump style aerosol dispenser during use thereby degassing the dispenser can be mitigated by promoting upright dispensing. The aerosol dispenser, particularly the actuator, can have an ergonomic design that can make it more intuitive to avoid tilting the aerosol more than 90° during use.
First, the aerosol dispenser can have an overhang below the nozzle. The overhang can be shaped to accommodate a semi-cylinder with a have a radius that allows at least half a finger of the receiving hand to fit under the nozzle, creating a “lock and key.” The overhang can help promote upright dispensing because it guides the receiving hand to a position that is both natural for receiving a foam product (palm up, approximately parallel to the ground) and makes it natural to dispense the foam without tilting the dispenser, an example is shown in
The overhang can be shaped to accommodate a semi-cylinder with a radius from about 10 mm to about 45 mm, alternatively from about 11 mm to about 40 mm, alternatively from about 11 mm to about 35 mm, alternatively from about 12 mm to about 30 mm, alternatively from about 15 mm to about 28 mm, alternatively from about 15 mm to about 25 mm The radius can be determined by the Overhang Radius Method, described hereafter.
The direction of actuation can also indicate how much the consumer will tilt the dispenser during use. It was found that consumers tend to align the axis of symmetry of the dispenser substantially in the direction of actuation.
The direction of actuation can be from about −10° to about 60° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser or valve, alternatively from about −7° to about 60°, alternatively from about −5° to about 45°, and alternatively from about 0° to about 35°. The direction of actuation can be determined by the Direction of Actuation Method, described hereafter.
The nozzle direction can also indicate how much the consumer will tilt the dispenser during use. The consumer generally wants to direct the foam into an open, flat, palm in a receiving/non-dispensing hand. The consumer will tilt the dispenser so the nozzle surface is approximately parallel to her hand.
The nozzle direction can be from about 5° to about 110°, alternatively from about 7° to about 100° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser or valve, alternatively from about 10° to about 95°, alternatively from about 20° to about 90°, alternatively from about 40° to about 88°, alternatively from about 50° to about 87°, and alternatively from about 55° to about 85°. The nozzle direction can be determined with the Nozzle Direction Method, described hereafter.
While dispensing, the user tends to put the nozzle surface against her palm or close to her palm and a larger nozzle surface can also minimize the propensity to tilt the dispenser during use. The surface area of the nozzle surface can be balanced between making it large to promote proper placement and small enough for the user can main maintain visual contact with the foam product being dispensed during actuation. The nozzle surface can be substantially flat with a surface area from about 50 mm2 to about 2500 mm2, alternatively from about 100 mm2 to about 1250 mm2, alternatively from about 200 mm2 to about 750 mm2, alternatively from about 300 mm2 to about 500 mm2.
During use, the pump style aerosol dispenser can have a 98% ile tilt angle of about 0° to about 90°, alternatively from about 0° to about 80°, alternatively from about 0° to about 76°, alternatively from about 0° to about 67.5°, alternatively from about 0° to about 60°, alternatively from about 0° to about 55°, alternatively from about 0° to about 50°, alternatively from about 0° to about 45°, and alternatively from about 0° to about 22.5°. The 98% ile tilt angle can be determined with the Aerosol Dispenser Tilt Angle Method, described hereafter.
The actuator peak force-to-actuate can be low enough to allow at least 90% of global non-impaired adult users between 18 and 65 years old use the package without compensating behavior such as pushing the container base against their belly, according to the Dispensing Observational Behavior Research test method described hereafter. The peak force to actuate can be ≤35 N, alternatively ≤30 N, alternatively ≤25 N and alternatively ≤20 N. The force to actuate can be ≥5N to avoid accidental actuation. The peak for to actuate can be determined by the Peak Force-to-Actuate test method, described hereafter. If too much force is required to actuate the dispenser, the consumer may over tile the aerosol dispenser.
The outer container can be shaped to promote grasp/grip during dispensing. In one example, the outer container can be concaved and/or contoured. This can be useful as the water and/or soap tends to make the surface of the container particularly slippery. The shoulder of the container can be larger than the base to promote hand support. Alternatively, the container can include one or more ribs or protruding features in the outer surface and/or can include a soft touch material to both provide support and increase friction with the consumer hand.
The actuator can be designed to act as actuator and not a support structure during storage. In some instances, the actuator's shape does not allow it to act as a support structure during storage. In some examples, the container can have a cap covering the actuator and the container's camp may be domed, slanted, or otherwise shaped so it cannot be used as a support structure. This is to eliminate potential misuse with consumers storing the aerosol upside down, which can cause degassing, especially if the product has low flowability.
It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.
Aerosol Dispenser
Referring to
The trigger 129 can be pressed down with a user's finger, generally the index finger on the user's dominant hand and in other instances, the user's thumb on the user's dominant hand. The user's finger can be planar with the trigger's surface and will actuate the trigger at an actuation direction. In the example in
The outer container 22 may be injection stretch blow molded (ISBM). Additionally, the containers 22 may be injection blow molded or extrusion blow molded. If ISBM is selected, a 1 step, 1.5 step or 2 step process may be used.
As seen in
Referring to
Referring to
The outer container 22 may range from about 100 mm to about 210 mm in height, taken in the axial direction and from about 35 to about 65 mm in diameter if a round footprint is selected, with other geometries also being feasible. The outer container 22 may have a volume ranging from 35 to 525 mL exclusive of any components therein. The outer container 22 may be injection stretch blow molded. If so, the injection stretch blow molding process may provide a planar stretch ratio greater than about 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 12, 15 or 20 and less than about 40, 30 or 25.
The outer container 22 may be pressurized to an internal gage pressure of 100-1150, kPa and discharged to a final propellant 40 gage pressure of 0 to 120 kPa. The pressurizeable container 22 may include a propellant 40. Any suitable propellant 40, including those propellants, which can also be referred to as a blooming agent, described hereafter, may be used.
Referring to
Referring to
If desired, the outer container 22 and/or dip tube 34, may be transparent or substantially transparent. If the outer container 22 is transparent, this arrangement provides the benefit that the consumer knows when product 42 is nearing depletion and allows for improved communication of product 42 attributes, such as color, viscosity, position of the liquid meniscus vs. the dip tube inlet, etc. If the outer container is transparent or substantially transparent, the dip tube may be also colored to achieve a visual break from the product. This can help to make the dip tube inlet even more visible by consumers. Also, labeling or other decoration of the container may be more apparent if the background to which such decoration is applied is clear. Alternatively, or additionally, the outer container 22 may be transparent and colored with like or different colors.
Nozzle component 75 includes nozzle surface 78 and shaping orifices 80. Nozzle component 75 in combination with a portion of the toupee 52 forms nozzle 90. Nozzle component can fit under toupee 52. Nozzle component 75 could allow different nozzle components with different shaping orifices to be interchanged during manufacturing, allowing different shaped foams for different products.
The actuator can include different systems to prevent accidental actuation before the first use (e.g. in distribution) or between uses (e.g. while carrying the aerosol in a gym bag). Twist lock mechanisms can be compatible with the actuator designs described in this invention due to the difficulty to cover nozzles with a pronounced overhang with an over-cap.
The shroud can be rigidly secured to the outer container. In one example, the shroud can be secured by engaging a plurality of lock beads that irreversible snap fit to the outer container. The shroud can be rigidly secured by 3-4 contact points.
Furthermore, as shown in
The number of beams and slots can vary based on the desired angle between the locked and unlocked position. In the specific example, four beads engage four slots to achieve about a 20° angle. In another example, three beads engage three slots to achieve about 50° angle between the unlocked to the locked position.
The latching mechanism can include beams that maintain the contact with the slots irrespective of whether or not that the dispenser is actuated. This construction can provide at least the following advantages: (1) the actuator body has substantially no tilt during actuation, as the actuation action is carried by the engagement of the trigger directly on the manifold. This was found to significantly improve control dispensing control, (2) a significantly improved separation force between the actuator body and the shroud preventing accidental disengagement/unlocking in the supply chain or during use and (3) a higher opening (unlocking) torque in the locked position which is desired to prevent unintended unlocking during distribution or consumer handling that could result in undesired dispensing.
The shroud can include one or more audible emitting ribs. Each rib can engage corresponding grooves. In one example, there can be two pairs grooves built into the actuator body: one for the intended locked and one for the unlocked positions respectively. Each rib can emit a sound both when the actuator is rotated away from/to the locked position or away from/to the unlocked position. Each rib can also cooperate with the grooves to maintain the shroud into the locked or unlocked position respectively.
Propellant
The composition described herein may comprise from about from about 2% to about 10% propellant, also referred to as a blooming agent, alternatively from about 3% to about 8% propellant, and alternatively from about 4% to about 7% propellant, by weight of the composition. The composition can be any suitable composition include shampoo, conditioner, and body wash compositions.
The propellant may comprise one or more volatile materials, which in a gaseous state, may carry the other components of the composition in particulate or droplet form. The propellant may have a boiling point within the range of from about −45° C. to about 5° C. The propellant may be liquefied when packaged in convention aerosol containers under pressure. The rapid boiling of the propellant upon leaving the aerosol foam dispenser may aid in the atomization of the other components of the composition.
Aerosol propellants which may be employed in the aerosol composition may include the chemically-inert hydrocarbons such as propane, n-butane, isobutane, cyclopropane, and mixtures thereof, as well as halogenated hydrocarbons such as dichlorodifluoromethane, 1,1-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, 1-chloro-1,1-difluoro-2,2-trifluoroethane, 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethylene, 1,1-difluoroethane, dimethyl ether, monochlorodifluoromethane, trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene, trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO 1234ze available by Honeywell), and mixtures thereof. The propellant may comprise hydrocarbons such as isobutane, propane, and butane—these materials may be used for their low ozone reactivity and may be used as individual components where their vapor pressures at 21.1° C. range from about 1.17 Bar to about 7.45 Bar, alternatively from about 1.17 Bar to about 4.83 Bar, and alternatively from about 2.14 Bar to about 3.79 Bar. The propellant may comprise an Isobutane/Propane blend, such as A46 from Aeropres Corp (Hillsborough US). The propellant may comprise hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs).
Test Methods
Actuation Direction
To determine the actuation direction, first, the centroid of the actuation surface of the trigger is determined. The actuation surface of the trigger is the portion of the trigger that transfers the force from the user's finger(s) to the valve allowing the product to be discharged.
The centroid will be projected to the convex hull of the actuation surface.
A vector is drawn from the projected centroid, in the direction of actuation, normal to the surface of the convex hull. If there is more than one such normal vector, then the relevant vector is the one that exhibits the shortest perpendicular distance from the centroid to the convex hull. If it is not possible to uniquely identify such a normal vector, then the actuation direction can be defined as the mean direction of all identified normal vectors.
A line is drawn through the projected centroid that is parallel to the aerosol dispenser axis of symmetry (or valve axis of symmetry if the dispenser is not axial symmetric). The angle between this line and the vector is measured to determine the actuation direction. The 0° angle is identified by the actuation direction parallel to the axis of symmetry and pointing towards the base.
The actuation direction may change from the start to the finish of the dispensing. The actuation direction at the start is measured before the trigger is actuated. The actuation direction at the finish is measured when the trigger is at the full stroke position.
Aerosol Dispenser Tilt Angle
The aerosol dispenser tilt angle is determined by film recording individuals dispensing the aerosol dispenser in the unlock i.e. dispense-ready position. To minimize any bias/error with the measurement: (1) the camera lens must be placed approximately 500-1000 mm in front of the consumers and oriented horizontally; (2) the consumer must stand facing the camera frontally during dispensing so that the container axis of symmetry is about perpendicular to the camera lens axis. Three measurements for users are taken for a minimum base size of 28 global non-impaired users (e.g. without arthritis, rheumatism, or limited range of motion etc.) selected such that their hand size is between the 5ile to the 95ile of the global population between 18 to 65 years old. The tilt angle is generated by analyzing the videos using a software such as CAMTASIA STUDIO 8® and measured at the point the user presses on the actuator button or trigger. All values generated are then collected and analyzed using a statistical evaluation software such as JMP12®. Then the average, standard deviation and 98% ile value for the tilt angle is calculated for each product.
Nozzle Direction
To determine the nozzle direction, first, the centroid of the one or more shaping orifices is determined. Depending on the shape of the shaping orifice, and whether it consists of multiple discreet portions, the centroid may or may not be included in the shaping orifice or on the nozzle surface. For example, if the open surface consists of two discrete, spaced apart orifices, then the centroid may be located between the two orifices. In another example, if the nozzle surface is concave, the centroid could be located above the nozzle surface. In another example, the nozzle surface is convex, the centroid is located below the nozzle surface.
The centroid will be projected to the surface of the convex hull of the nozzle surface. In many instances, the centroid and projected centroid are at the same point.
A vector is drawn from the projected centroid, away from the nozzle, and normal to the surface of the convex hull.
A line is drawn through the projected centroid that is parallel to the aerosol dispenser axis of symmetry (or valve axis of symmetry if the dispenser is not axial symmetric). The angle between this line and the vector is measured to determine the nozzle direction. The 0° angle is identified by the nozzle direction parallel to the axis of symmetry and pointing towards the base.
Dispensing Observational Behavior Research
Observational behavioral research is performed by video recording consumers dispensing an aerosol while performing a task i.e. during their hair washing routine. The research is performed on at least 28 global adult non-impaired users (e.g. without arthritis, rheumatism, or limited range of motion etc.) selected such that their hand size is between the 5ile to the 95ile of the global population between 18 to 65 years old. The following information is extracted from the videos:
As shown in
Peak Force-to-Actuate
The aerosol peak force-to-actuate is measured according the ASTM D6534-18 ‘Standard Practice for Determining the Peak Force-to-Actuate of a Mechanical Pump Dispenser’. The samples are conditioned for at least 24 hours at room temperature before dispensing. The pump heads are actuated at a speed of 50 mm/sec at 90% stroke length. The compression force tester used is an Instron® 8500 or equivalent tester capable of meeting the required head speed and accuracy of 0.1 Newtons.
For the Examples in Tables 1-3, the tilt angle was determined by observing 35 panelists interacting with Examples A-N and Examples 1-3. A video was taken to determine (1) how quickly panelist determined how to actuate; and (2) inclination during actuation. The panelists actuated each product three times. The average tilt and standard deviation was calculated and the 98% ile value reported in the table
Examples A, B, C, F, H, and M are examples that have a nozzle direction, overhang, and actuation direction that leads to a tilt angle that is less than 90°, which indicates that these bottles are less likely to degas and can provide a high-quality foam for the duration of dispensing. Example H has a large overhang (radius of 25 mm), this large overhang reduces tilt even though the nozzle direction points slightly up (95°). Example M not only has the most downward nozzle direction (10°), it also has a large nozzle surface that can further minimize the tilt variability. However, the large overhang radius and the bend in the nozzle could make Example M difficult to ship, manufacture, and store in one's shower where there is generally limited storage space.
In Example D, the trigger is below the nozzle and to actuate the trigger panelists move the trigger in a direction that is substantially normal to the axis of symmetry. It was found that when actuating this example, panelists tend to keep the trigger parallel to the ground and they tilt the dispenser too far while actuating, which will ultimately result in the dispenser degassing and dispensing runny, low-quality foam.
In Example E, the nozzle direction is upwards (110°) and the trigger is on the side of the actuator. Again, it was found that panelists tilted the dispenser too far while actuating.
In Examples G, I, and J have overhangs that are too small. This also resulted in substantial tilting when actuating the device and therefore these actuators is not preferred for dip tube aerosols.
Example K has the same nozzle direction as Example H. However, since Example K has a small overhang (10 mm), it was found that panelists title the dispenser too far (106°) when actuating and therefore this combination is not preferred.
Example L has a nozzle that points upwards (115°) and a small overhang (5 mm) and it was found that panelists tilt this dispenser too far (123°) when actuating.
In Example N, the nozzle points upwards (180°), there was no overhang, and panelists actuated the dispenser by pressing a button on the side of the actuator. Not only did this result in a substantial tilt (249°), but the mean time to actuate was too long (>3 second) and it was prone to misuse. Furthermore, many panelists used and/or stored Example N upside down. Panelists generally want a dispenser that will dispense high quality foam for the entire life of the produce and they also want something that is simple, fast, and intuitive to use.
Examples 1, 2, and 3 in
Table 3 were not preferred by the panelists, in part, because they were not intuitive to actuate. The panelists struggled with these dispensers because the nozzle direction varied during dispensing. This was especially true when the nozzle/orifice is not even visible before actuation, like Example 1 (see
Combinations
A. An aerosol dispenser with an axis of symmetry comprising:
B. An aerosol dispenser with an axis of symmetry comprising:
C. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraph A, wherein the overhang can be shaped to accommodate a semi-cylinder with a radius from about 12 mm to about 30 mm, preferably from about 15 mm to about 28 mm, and more preferably from about 15 mm to about 25 mm, according to the Overhang Radius Method, described herein.
D. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-C, wherein the direction of actuation is from about −7° to about 60° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser, preferably from about −5° to about 45° from the axis of symmetry of the dispenser.
E. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-D, wherein the actuator further comprises a shroud attached to the top of the outer container.
F. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-E, wherein the aerosol dispenser further comprises a dispensing channel for receiving a mixture of product and propellant when the valve is in an open position, wherein the dispensing channel remains in a fixed position relative to the outer container during actuation of the trigger.
G. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-F, wherein the nozzle remains in fixed position relative to the to the container during actuation of the trigger.
H. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-G, wherein the actuator and/or an actuator body has substantially no tilt during actuation.
I. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-H, wherein the outer container comprises a plastic selected from the group consisting of polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, and combinations thereof.
J. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-I, wherein the outer container is transparent or substantially transparent.
K. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-J, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of shampoo, conditioner, body wash, and combinations thereof.
L. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-K, wherein the nozzle surface is substantially flat and comprises a surface area from about 50 mm2 to about 2500 mm2, preferably from about 100 mm2 to about 1250 mm2, more preferably from about 200 mm2 to about 750 mm2, and even more preferably from about 300 mm2 to about 500 mm2.
M. The aerosol dispenser according to Paragraphs A-L, wherein the actuator further comprises: a shroud fixed to the outer container and an actuator body rotatably fixed to the shroud wherein the actuator body rotates between a locked and unlocked position.
N. The lockable aerosol dispenser according to Paragraph M, further comprising at least an audible rib in the shroud cooperating with two grooves in the top assembly to produce an audible sound when the actuator is twisted from the locked to the dispense ready position and vice versa.
O. A method of dispensing a foam from an aerosol container comprising:
P. The method according to Paragraph O, wherein during actuation wherein during actuation, the aerosol dispenser comprises a 98% ile tilt angle of about 0° to about 76° relative to an axis perpendicular to the ground.
Q. The method according to Paragraphs O-P, wherein during actuation wherein during actuation, the aerosol dispenser comprises a 98% ile tilt angle of about 0° to about 67.5° relative to an axis perpendicular to the ground.
R. The method of according to paragraphs O-Q, wherein before actuating the outside of the receiving hand or the side of the little finger is brought adjacent to the overhang.
S. The method of according to paragraphs O-R, wherein the peak force to actuate is from about 5 N to about 40 N, preferably from about 5 N to about 35 N, preferably from about 5 N to about 30 N, and even more preferably from about 5 N to about 20 N.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
267855 | Fenley, Sr. | Nov 1882 | A |
2430718 | Jacobson | Nov 1947 | A |
2911159 | Doyle | Nov 1959 | A |
3104785 | Knapp | Sep 1963 | A |
3235135 | Henri | Feb 1966 | A |
3247640 | De Wayne Miles et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3250444 | Ward | May 1966 | A |
3361301 | Philip | Jan 1968 | A |
3506165 | Beard | Apr 1970 | A |
3584789 | Traynor | Jun 1971 | A |
3981419 | Nilson | Sep 1976 | A |
4122845 | Stouffer | Oct 1978 | A |
4433797 | Galia | Feb 1984 | A |
4562942 | Diamond | Jan 1986 | A |
4592743 | Hjertman et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4694975 | Hagan | Sep 1987 | A |
4877156 | Clanet | Oct 1989 | A |
4892232 | Martin | Jan 1990 | A |
4896832 | Howlett | Jan 1990 | A |
4919312 | Beard | Apr 1990 | A |
4941598 | Lambelet, Jr. et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5031802 | Joulia | Jul 1991 | A |
5056690 | Ichihara | Oct 1991 | A |
5105995 | Martin | Apr 1992 | A |
5199616 | Martin | Apr 1993 | A |
5305930 | De Laforcade | Apr 1994 | A |
5370313 | Beard | Dec 1994 | A |
5429280 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441181 | Scheindel | Aug 1995 | A |
5520310 | Bauer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5577641 | De Laforcade | Nov 1996 | A |
5624055 | Clanet | Apr 1997 | A |
5875927 | D'Andrade | Mar 1999 | A |
5904274 | Warby | May 1999 | A |
5914085 | Zimmerhackel | Jun 1999 | A |
6004300 | Butcher | Dec 1999 | A |
6095182 | Warby | Aug 2000 | A |
6260738 | Kerr | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334553 | Bouras | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405898 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6745920 | Gupta | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7104424 | Kolanus | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7306123 | Masuda | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7306124 | Masuda | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7665923 | Py et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8006868 | Geiberger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8387827 | Helf | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8616417 | Neuhaus | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8720747 | Hoagland | May 2014 | B2 |
8863994 | Neuhaus et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9211994 | Andersen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9403636 | Bodet et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9469468 | Shibata | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10022740 | Van Swieten et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10364092 | Schroer et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10364093 | Bartolucci | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10370178 | Schroer et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10449131 | Li et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10479587 | Mizoguchi et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10625929 | Bartolucci | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10625930 | Takahashi | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10850914 | Bartolucci | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20020162450 | Frost | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050103811 | Heukamp | May 2005 | A1 |
20060065677 | Py | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060196889 | Masuda | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070051754 | Strand | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070090133 | Macleod et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095853 | Bonney et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125799 | Bonney | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137643 | Bonney | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070164049 | Bonney | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175917 | Bonney | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080061083 | Masuda | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083776 | Gupta | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080149098 | Bonney | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080272144 | Bonney | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090272765 | Seki et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100308082 | Lamble | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110011889 | Bonney | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120006859 | Wilkinson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130019802 | Leck | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130068119 | Kennedy | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140209633 | Mcdaniel | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150090736 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160129197 | Hetting | May 2016 | A1 |
20170182699 | Kase | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180072485 | Fore | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180201434 | Presche | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180273290 | Claeys | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190071242 | Bartolucci | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190152684 | Bartolucci | May 2019 | A1 |
20200108003 | Iwata et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200148458 | Bartolucci | May 2020 | A1 |
20200148459 | Bartolucci | May 2020 | A1 |
20200316629 | Bartolucci | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200977495 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101863350 | Oct 2010 | CN |
3147004 | May 1983 | DE |
19937554 | Mar 2001 | DE |
202016101580 | Aug 2017 | DE |
0571280 | May 1997 | EP |
1380520 | Jan 2004 | EP |
3409618 | Dec 2018 | EP |
1454371 | Sep 1966 | FR |
2311593 | Dec 1976 | FR |
2990421 | Feb 2015 | FR |
1414637 | Nov 1975 | GB |
0220959 | Feb 1990 | JP |
0462677 | May 1992 | JP |
H0535772 | May 1993 | JP |
H066278 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2000309387 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2007532181 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2009082814 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011067362 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2018058591 | Apr 2018 | JP |
9427890 | Dec 1994 | WO |
2004045778 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2017115827 | Jul 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/926,075. |
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/118,663. |
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/184,367. |
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/194,502. |
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,879. |
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/907,677. |
European Search Report for 17162178.2 dated Aug. 21, 2017. |
European Search Report for EP 17175852.7 dated Sep. 19, 2017. |
European Search Report for EP 17189053.6 dated Feb. 28, 2018. |
European Search Report for EP 17203315.1 dated May 4, 2018. |
European Search Report for EP18152909.0 dated Jun. 18, 2018. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2018/058653 dated Jan. 25, 2019. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/012453 dated Apr. 1, 2019. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/060172 dated Apr. 23, 2020. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/060173 dated Jun. 2, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210039876 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16184367 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 17076907 | US |