1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to communication techniques. In particular, the present disclosure relates to signal processing techniques in a direct-conversion transmitter.
2. Description of the prior art
Main trends for radio frequency (RF) communication systems nowadays are to simplify circuits, to reduce chip size, and to save in overall hardware cost. In comparison with a superheterodyne transceiver, a conventional direct-conversion transceiver has a simpler structure but is not prevalent due to immature manufacturing techniques. In recent years, with the advancements in techniques for manufacturing integrated circuits, a direct-conversion transceiver with good performance becomes practicable and accordingly draws much attention.
One problem of this direct-conversion transmitter is that the modulation process in the transmitter 100 usually causes disturbance to the VCO 122. Taking the condition that the divisor of the frequency divider 123 is equal to two (2), the frequency band of the second harmonic of the output signal in the transmitter 100 is very close to the frequency of the oscillating signal in the VCO 122. Similarly, if the divisor of the frequency divider 123 is equal to four (4), the frequency band of the fourth harmonic of the output signal is very close to the frequency of the oscillating signal in the VCO 122. This interference caused by the transmitter 100 introduces phase noise to the oscillating signal in the VCO 122 (i.e. causes the oscillating signal to float) and then inevitably decreases the output signal quality of the transmitter 100.
To solve the aforementioned problem, the disclosure provides a new direct-conversion transmitter. By inserting a well-designed filter between the oscillator and transmitter, the interference from the transmitter to the oscillator may be substantially reduced.
One embodiment according to the disclosure is a direct-conversion transmitter including an oscillator, a frequency divider, a transmitter, and a filter. The oscillator generates an oscillating signal with an original frequency. The frequency divider performs frequency dividing on the oscillating signal, so as to generate a carrier signal. The transmitter receives the carrier signal from the frequency divider and generates an output signal based on the carrier signal and a data signal. The filter is coupled between the frequency divider and the transmitter. The filter filters out an interference signal fed-back from the transmitter to the oscillator, wherein the interference signal may cause the oscillating signal to float.
Another embodiment according to the disclosure is a communication system including a direct-conversion transmitter. The direct-conversion transmitter includes an oscillator, a frequency divider, a transmitter, and a filter. The oscillator generates an oscillating signal with an original frequency. The frequency divider performs frequency dividing on the oscillating signal, so as to generate a carrier signal. The transmitter receives the carrier signal from the frequency divider and generates an output signal based on the carrier signal and a data signal. The filter is coupled between the frequency divider and the transmitter. The filter filters out an interference signal fed-back from the transmitter to the oscillator, wherein the interference signal may cause the oscillating signal to float.
The advantage and spirit of the disclosure may be understood by the following recitations together with the appended drawings.
In
In
The oscillator 210 generates an oscillating signal OSC with an original frequency F0. The frequency divider 220 is coupled to the oscillator 210 and performs frequency dividing on the oscillating signal to generate a carrier signal with a carrier frequency FC. Based on the carrier signal and the data signal provided by the data generator 240, the transmitter 250 generates an output signal. As shown in
Several different embodiments of how to implement the filter in the direct-conversion transmitter in the present disclosure are illustrated in
To be specific, with the filter 230, the carrier signal provided by the frequency divider 220 may still pass to the transmitter 250 via the connection path; thus, the overall function of this direct-conversion transmitter is not affected. On the contrary, the interference with frequency close to the frequency F0 that might be fed-back to the voltage-controlled oscillator 210 via this connection path is blocked by the filter 230. Exemplary stop-bands (shown as shaded regions) of the filter 230 are illustrated in
It is to be noted that in other embodiments, the filter 230 may be disposed at other critical paths between the oscillator 210 and the transmitter 250. For instance, the filter 230 may also be disposed at a power transmission line, a ground line, or any path that may introduce interference from the transmitter 250 to the oscillator 210. The number of filters 230 is not limited to any specific embodiment. The circuit designer may plan the position and number of filters upon design choices.
Furthermore,
Moreover, the filter 230 may have common power transmission lines (including power supply lines and/or ground lines) with the transmitter 250 while the phase-locked loop that includes the voltage-controlled oscillator 210 does not have common power transmission lines with the filter. This design may prevent the interference entering the ground node of the filter 230 from attacking the voltage-controlled oscillator 210 via power lines.
As described above, the disclosure provides a new direct-conversion transmitter. By inserting a well-designed filter between the oscillator and transmitter, the interference from the transmitter to the oscillator may be substantially reduced.
With the example and explanations above, the features and spirits of the disclosure will be hopefully well described. Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device may be made while retaining the teaching of the disclosure. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5279042 | Gonzalez et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5825254 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
7301404 | Mattisson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
8280322 | Zolfaghari et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20040023625 | Jonsson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050164733 | Sato | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070259740 | Savarese et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293163 | Kilpatrick et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090156150 | Deleon | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100215120 | Groe et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110128992 | Maeda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120034872 | Chien | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064839 | Yang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120302188 | Sahota et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140141734 A1 | May 2014 | US |