The present invention relates to hydraulic control valves, and, more particularly to a direct operated hydraulic servovalves.
Hydraulic directional control valves are used to direct the flow of oil in the hydraulic lines according to the working position taken by the valves. For example, a valve with four ports, with one port connected to the high oil pressure source, one port connected to the tank, and the other two ports connected to two sides of an actuator can assume three working position. In the first position, when the valve is not given any input signal, the valve takes the central position. If in this valve position the actuator is required to remain unmoving, the ports connected to the actuator should be closed. If the valve is supplied by an input signal to assume another working position, one of the actuator ports may be connected to the high oil pressure port while the other actuator port is connected to the tank, and the actuator consequently would move in one direction. When the valve receives another input signal to be in its third working position, the connections of the port are reversed and the actuator would move in the opposite position. The time required for the valve to move from one working position to the other is about one tenth of a second, and this time depends on whether the valve is a direct or pilot operated. In pilot operated valve, a pilot valve is used to actuate the main valve which controls the actuator to overcome the opposing forces that might restrict the motion of the main valve. The most widely used directional control valves are the spool valves that connect and disconnect the valve ports in different possible ways according to control requirements.
Hydraulic servo valves, and contrary to the directional control valves are characterized by the fact that their spools can assume infinite number of working position. This allows the servo valves to open partially, and allows the accurate control of the flow rate and/or the oil pressure, beside controlling the flow direction. The speed of response of the servo valve is much higher than that of the directional control valves with speed of response of about 0.01 seconds. This high accuracy and speed of response cannot be achieved without the high machining accuracy that results in a high production cost. Direct operated servo valves allow only low flow rates, and for the moderate and high flow rates pilot operated servo valves of high cost should be used.
A third type of valves with spools that can assume infinite number of working position, as in servo valves, but is of less accuracy, lower speed of response, and lower production cost is the proportional valves. A valve of the propositional type can replace several valves of the ON/OFF type.
There are always limits for the speed of response of the valving elements of the servo, proportional, or fast switching valves. These limits are attributed to the capacities of the actuators of the valve, which in most cases receive electric input signals, generate forces or torques that cause mechanical displacement of the valving elements. The generated forces or toques should overcome the forces aching on the valaving element such as the friction, flow and pressure farces. What remains after overcoming these forces is exploited in overcoming the valving element inertia, and the valve speed of response is determined according to this remaining part of the generated forces or toques. If the liquid flow rate is increased, the force to be overcome by the actuator increases and might reach to a value that can't be overcome by the actuator. In this case a pilot operated valve should be used, with a pilot valve driven by the actuator and controlling the main valve. At certain higher flow rates, more pilot stages are to be used. The increase of the speed of response of the valves and the flow rates that can pass through them, would reduce the needed number of pilot stage and improve the valves performance. Thus, there is a need to improve the speed of response and increase the allowable flow rates of direct operated valves to replace pilot operated valves or to be used as pilot stages with better performance for pilot operated valves. These improved direct operated valves can also be used as pilot stages for the on/off pilot operated directional control valves to transfer them to fast switching valves, with low production cost, that can be used in applications requiring fast and accurate control.
In view of the same, in one aspect, the present disclosure provides a directional control and servo valve. The directional control and servo valve may include a valve housing and a valving element. The valve housing includes a space, and a plurality of first cavities. Each first cavity of the plurality of first cavities incorporates a port for enabling liquid flow in the valve housing. Further, the valving element having two sides thereof. Each side includes a plurality of second cavities that corresponds the plurality of first cavities. The plurality of second cavities on each side are symmetrical to each other. The valving element includes plurality of webs formed in the plurality of second cavities. Each web separates the plurality of second cavities on each side from each other. The plurality of webs includes a plurality of holes adapted to connect the plurality of second cavities of both sides. The valving element is disposed in the space of the valve housing such that an assembly formed therebetween configures a plurality of control edges that separates at least one first cavity of the plurality of first cavities with respective at least one second cavity of the plurality of second cavities to form control orifices that are symmetrical along the both sides of the valving element. Further, the valving element is rotated along an axial direction thereof to uncover the control orifices to allow the liquid flow to pass therealong to divide the liquid flow in symmetrical pattern along the valving element. Furthermore, the liquid flow is also enabled along the both sides of the valving element through the plurality of holes.
The new valve incorporates a valaving element that has cavities, which connect or disconnect the valve ports according to the valaving element position determined by the valve actuator. The valve actuator may be electrically driven by electromagnetic device or piezoelectric actuator or else. To realize large control orifices, despite that these actuators have generally short stokes and their driving forces or torques are of considerable values only for short displacements, the valving element motion in the new valve is rotational. A small angular displacement resulting from a rotary actuator as a torque motor or a linear actuator of high force acting on a short arm, would result in an appreciable circumferential displacement that increases with the radius increase. In other words, the actuator small angular displacement which occurs at a small radius is enlarged at the bigger radii, where the valve control orifices are formed. To increase the areas of the control orifices in order to increase the valve flow gain, a pair of symmetrical control orifices are used instead of a single control orifice. Each orifice of the pair of control orifices is formed on one edge at a side of the two sides of the valving element. The two control orifices on the two sides of the valving element are exactly symmetrical and aligned. The liquid flows through the cavities to the control orifices through the valving element itself. In addition to doubling the control orifice area by using two edges instead of one, two advantages are obtained. The first one is that the two sides of the valving element are subject to the same pressure, and thus it is statically balanced. Besides, symmetrical flows on the valving element edges result in lateral balanced flow forces on it, this makes the valving element motion easier, with lowest possible forces. The second advantage is that the cavities reduce the valving element mass and hence its moment of inertia. For the rigidity of the valving element, webs are used in the cavities. The webs have through holes in order to allow the liquid to flow between the two sides.
For flow passage to be large enough, they are formed as cavities in the valve housing, or as alternatively in fixed parts inside the valve, in addition to the cavities in the valving element.
With the proper design of the valving element, different types of ports connections in the valve working position can be realized to satisfy the needs of the different application.
In what follows, a valve with four ports shall be explained, as an example, but valves with two, three, or more ports can also be designed. Also, a valve with four ports closed in the central position and each two ports are connected in the other two working positions, is considered. Other valves with different methods of connecting the ports, as in the currently prevailing valves, can be designed.
The cavities (4), (6), (8), and (10) can be formed in a separate piece placed beside the valving element. This would facilitate manufacturing and reduce the production cost.
The details of these cavities are seen in frontal view sections in
These valves are directional control valves that can replace the currently widely used directional control valves, but with higher speed of response which suits the applications demanding fast switching, they suit also applications in which digital control techniques are to be used. From this side, these valves can be viewed as servo valves. Furthermore, the valving element of a valve of this type can assume any position between its central and extreme position, and thus it can replace servo valves of the same size with a flow rate capacity higher than the servo valve. This would lead to replace a two-stage servo valve by a single stage valve of the presented type. Using a valve of the proposed type as a pilot valve would increase the speed of response of the pilot operated valve main stage. If used as a pilot valve for a conventional directional control valve, the whole valve would be a fast switching to be used in fast response control techniques, with relatively much lower cost.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015040503 | Apr 2015 | EG | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EG2016/000009 | 3/29/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/155750 | 10/6/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2451575 | Paxton | Oct 1948 | A |
2827924 | Towler | Mar 1958 | A |
2989080 | Dillberg | Jun 1961 | A |
2990853 | Sharp | Jul 1961 | A |
3066697 | Chapman | Dec 1962 | A |
3190313 | Rumsey | Jun 1965 | A |
3207180 | Mercier | Sep 1965 | A |
3237644 | Beck | Mar 1966 | A |
3391608 | Huber | Jul 1968 | A |
3451428 | Pruett | Jun 1969 | A |
3460574 | Risher | Aug 1969 | A |
3542071 | Debbrecht | Nov 1970 | A |
3696710 | Ortelli | Oct 1972 | A |
3742979 | Woodling | Jul 1973 | A |
3768516 | Cyphelly | Oct 1973 | A |
3892259 | McClocklin | Jul 1975 | A |
4281684 | Broeg | Aug 1981 | A |
4823550 | Decker | Apr 1989 | A |
6161583 | Morris | Dec 2000 | A |
7819948 | Wagner | Oct 2010 | B2 |
9010370 | Isenhour | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9109824 | Pawlik | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20040187937 | Kozuka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050194053 | Jeromson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20150090345 | Olovsson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180087542 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |