The present invention relates generally to a storage matrix associated with an automated stowage and retrieval system designed to accommodate palletized and containerized freight of various dimensions. While the invention has utility in a variety of environments, embodiments are specifically disclosed in connection with a shipboard system for handling cargo and weapons within the holds and magazines of naval vessels or other ships at sea.
Cargo and weapons bound for a naval vessel or other type of ship are normally packaged for transportation and stowage in one of two ways: goods are either secured to a pallet or are enclosed in a shipping container. Based on a typical inventory of weapons and stores aboard a current-generation aircraft carrier or other surface combatant, most pallets measure 44 inches in length by 40 inches in height and can weigh as much as 3,800 pounds. Containerized loads, in which the cargo or weapons are fully enclosed in a rigid box, can weigh up to 9,640 pounds, with lengths up to 312 inches. Individual pallets and containers of all types and sizes are handled many times by various crews and equipment and may be restowed in the holds of several different ships before reaching their ultimate point of use.
Such palletized and containerized cargo and weapons payloads are generally first moved from locations in pierside warehouses or weapons storage depots to staging areas on a dock using forklift trucks. They are then hoisted onto the top deck of a shuttle ship or a specialized cargo vessel called an Underway Replenishment (UNREP) ship using conventional cranes. Once aboard the UNREP ship, the pallets and containers are again moved with forklifts, pallet movers, or sometimes cranes to one of several elevators, where they are lowered for stowage into a hold or magazine on one of the vessel's multiple cargo decks.
After descending to the appropriate hold or magazine, each pallet or container is removed from an elevator platform using another forklift truck and is deposited at its particular stowage site in the storeroom, where it is usually stacked on identical pallets or containers to the maximum height permitted by either container capacity or the height of the storeroom ceiling. Each individual load or stack is then manually secured to the deck for safe transit at sea using tie-down straps, chains, nets or blocking. When the time comes to transfer the pallets and containers from the UNREP ship to a surface combatant during transit at sea, the procedure is reversed. After the cargo is delivered to the combatant ship via connected replenishment gear or aircraft, the same procedures are again employed, using a series of lift trucks and elevators to restow the pallets and containers in holds and magazines located below decks.
This stowage and retrieval process is extremely time-consuming, manpower-intensive, and inefficient. For example, during the cargo retrieval process, forklift operators in each hold or weapons magazine must select the pallet or container that has been ordered, manually remove the tie-down straps, chains, nets or other restraining devices that were previously installed to secure it to the hold deck for safe transit at sea, and then pick up the load, maneuver it between the other stored cargo, and deliver it to the elevator trunk. When the elevator platform becomes available, the forklift drives onto the platform and deposits the payload. The elevator often must wait until several of the weapons or cargo payloads requested from that magazine or hold have been acquired and loaded before it can deliver the goods to their destination, delaying parallel activities in the other magazines and holds that the elevator services.
Forklift trucks, which are typically the prime movers for horizontal operations in this entire sequence of events, have certain intrinsic disadvantages for this application. First, they require aisles to be cleared within which to maneuver the payloads, and space to access each with their tines, so the cargo in each hold or magazine is repeatedly rearranged to acquire requested payloads. A considerable amount of floor space must be left vacant to provide sufficient maneuvering room for the forklifts and for temporary cargo staging areas. As a result, payloads cannot be stowed as densely as desired. Second, forklift trucks are by-nature quite heavy themselves and thus place undue stress on the elevator platform and its actuator system when driven onto the freight elevator carrying individual payloads. Third, as discussed, payloads must be unloaded from or loaded onto the freight elevator platform one at a time, so the elevator must wait until each is individually stowed or retrieved. Fourth, forklifts have proved to be quite maintenance-intensive and costly over their service life. Finally, this cargo and weapons stowage and retrieval process must often be performed in high seas, where even the largest surface vessels, such as aircraft carriers, pitch and roll violently. In certain sea states, handling large and heavy palletized and containerized loads with forklift trucks becomes unsafe and the process must be stopped.
Conventional “rack-and-aisle” automated storage and retrieval systems used today in land-based warehouses also have significant limitations. First, these systems are capable of handling payloads of only one size and shape, typically pallets. Second, in order to achieve selective access, i.e., the ability to access any individual payload contained in the system, one fixed, empty aisle must be provided between every two storage racks to provide access to every cargo unit, or empty rack space must be reserved to allow payloads to be shuffled from one rack to another. In either case, high storage density cannot be achieved. Finally, these industrial warehousing systems are not designed for shipboard applications in which the cargo contained is subject to high dynamic loads caused by ship motion and must be restrained at all times.
Despite continuing efforts on the part of the Navy and commercial operators to maximize efficiency in transporting, handling and stowing palletized and containerized cargo and weapons of various sizes and shapes at sea, current systems have limitations in stowage density, speed of access, and securing of payloads. Accordingly, automated stowage and retrieval systems are desired that achieve high three-dimensional stowage density within a given hold or magazine, that permit any payload contained in the storeroom to be accessed, loaded and unloaded on associated service elevators quickly, and/or that automatically secure those payloads for transit in rough seas.
According to one embodiment, a storage matrix is provided. The storage matrix comprises a plurality of stationary cell modules arranged within the storage matrix, and a plurality of carriers. The cell modules disposed along the outer rows of the matrix comprise a plurality of motors arranged along both planar axes of the storage matrix, and the cell modules disposed along the inner rows of the storage matrix comprise at least one metal plate, for example a ferrous or iron plate, and at least one motor disposed along one of the planar axes of the storage matrix. The plurality of carriers comprise at least one magnet disposed on an underside of each of the carriers, wherein the at least one magnet is configured to engage a motor on the inner row cell modules or the outer row cell modules. In operation, the plurality of motors of each outer row cell module is configured to move the respective carrier bi-directionally within the storage matrix and is also configured to stabilize the respective carrier when the carrier is moving or at a stationary position. In one embodiment, the stabilization is due to magnetic attraction between the magnets, e.g. permanent magnets, on the underside of the moving carrier and the motors, for example, stationary iron-core linear electric motors, or the metal plates. The at least one motor of each inner row cell module is configured to move the respective carriers uni-directionally within the storage matrix and the at least metal plate of each inner cell module is configured to stabilize the respective carrier when the carrier is moving or at a stationary position.
According to another embodiment, a cell module permanently mounted to a portion of a storage matrix is provided. The cell module comprises at least one linear synchronous motor disposed along one of the planar axes of a storage matrix. The cell module also comprises at least one metal plate, for example, a ferrous metal plate, disposed along a portion of the cell module, and a plurality of roller bearings.
These and additional objects and advantages provided by the embodiments of the present invention will be more fully understood in view of the following detailed description, in conjunction with the drawings.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present invention can be best understood when read in conjunction with the drawings enclosed herewith. The drawing sheets include:
a and 5b, when viewed consecutively, are schematic plan views illustrating the movement sequence of a plurality of carriers within a storage matrix according to one or more embodiments of the present invention; and
a is a schematic view of a topside of a carrier according to one or more embodiments of the present invention; and
b is a schematic view of an underside of a carrier according to one or more embodiments of the present invention.
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative in nature and not intended to be limiting of the invention defined by the claims. Moreover, individual features of the drawings and the invention will be more fully apparent and understood in view of the detailed description.
The present invention is directed to maximizing the amount of cargo in a limited three-dimensional space. Referring to
Referring to
Each cell module, whether an outer row cell module 10 or an inner cell module 20, is a permanent structure embedded in or securely mounted to the floor of a storage matrix 1. In the embodiments of
In an exemplary embodiment, the motors of the inner row cell modules 20 and the outer row cell modules 10 may comprise linear synchronous motors, for example, short drive linear synchronous motors, long drive linear synchronous motors, or combinations thereof. In a further embodiment, the motors may comprise iron-core linear synchronous motors, for example, and not by way of limitation, the IC55-250 Direct Drive Linear Synchronous Motor Assembly manufactured by Kollmorgen.
Referring to
As shown in the embodiment of
Consequently, the inner row cell modules 20 may comprise a metal plate 24, for example a ferrous metal plate, as shown in
In addition to securing the carriers 20, the motors of the inner row cell module 20 and the outer row cell module 10 are also configured to transfer a carrier from one cell module to another cell module. As stated above, due to the placement of the motors, the outer row cell modules 10 may move the carriers 30 bi-directionally, whereas the inner row cell modules 10 may move the carriers 30 uni-directionally. When a carrier 30 is present on an outer row cell module 10, the linear synchronous motors 12, 14 deliver a thrust force in the X and Y direction, which decouples the carrier magnets 34, 32 from the motors 12, 14, respectively, and moved the carrier in either planar axis to an adjacent inner or outer row cell module. When a carrier 30 is present on an inner row cell module 20, the linear synchronous motors 22 delivers a thrust force in only one planar axis, e.g. the Y axis, which decouples the carrier magnets 34 from the motors 22, and move the carrier in only one planar axis, e.g. in the Y direction to an adjacent inner or outer row cell module.
This uni-directional movement of the inner row cell modules 20 modifies the movement sequence, which is modeled after the sliding puzzle principle.
To reduce friction as a carrier 30 slides from one cell module to another and thereby further reduce the required amount of thrust, the outer row cell modules 10 and the inner row cell modules 20 may both comprise friction-reducing surfaces. The friction reducing surfaces may comprise any suitable material operable to minimize sliding friction as a carrier or another vehicle moves over the cell modules 10 or 20. In one exemplary embodiment, the friction reducing surfaces may comprise a fluoropolymer material, such as PFA or PTFE. In another exemplary embodiment, the friction reducing surfaces may comprise Rulon®. Alternatively, the bearings may also comprise ball transfer units or air bearings. As shown in
Referring to the embodiment of
It is noted that terms like “specifically,” “preferably,” “generally”, “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed invention or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed invention. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present invention. It is also noted that terms like “substantially” and “about” are utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation.
Having described the invention in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present invention are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present invention is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/778,298 filed Mar. 2, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2956763 | D'Arca | Oct 1960 | A |
3554389 | Bright | Jan 1971 | A |
3622020 | Sarvary | Nov 1971 | A |
3664273 | Howe | May 1972 | A |
3683821 | Mangold | Aug 1972 | A |
3800963 | Holland | Apr 1974 | A |
3850109 | Thornton | Nov 1974 | A |
3860130 | Frangos | Jan 1975 | A |
3933257 | Weber | Jan 1976 | A |
4098409 | Massey | Jul 1978 | A |
4186841 | Buckley et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4480748 | Wind | Nov 1984 | A |
4638744 | Clive-Smith | Jan 1987 | A |
4662532 | Anderson et al. | May 1987 | A |
4773547 | Bell | Sep 1988 | A |
4878796 | Ammeraal | Nov 1989 | A |
4897012 | Brewer | Jan 1990 | A |
5271701 | Hopland | Dec 1993 | A |
5285909 | Slater | Feb 1994 | A |
5329862 | Breezer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345879 | Maillard | Sep 1994 | A |
5388532 | Wakano | Feb 1995 | A |
5395119 | Jacob et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404821 | Bond | Apr 1995 | A |
5407316 | Coatta et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412863 | Prodel | May 1995 | A |
5415311 | Coogan | May 1995 | A |
5487636 | Mkrtchyan | Jan 1996 | A |
5669753 | Schween | Sep 1997 | A |
5707199 | Faller | Jan 1998 | A |
5857413 | Ward | Jan 1999 | A |
5862917 | Noble et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915905 | Hopland | Jun 1999 | A |
6045319 | Uchida et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059521 | Rapeli | May 2000 | A |
6077019 | Corcoran | Jun 2000 | A |
6148752 | Upmeyer | Nov 2000 | A |
6170686 | Flores | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230640 | Nordstrom et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6279763 | Bush | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315513 | Harukawa et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325224 | Brown | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340136 | Luria | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6626612 | Knapp | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6842665 | Karlen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
20060058912 | Karlen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070205628 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60778298 | Mar 2006 | US |