This application claims the benefit of European Patent Application Serial No. 15154472.3, filed Feb. 10, 2015, and titled “Directional Microphone Module,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a microphone module comprising at least two directional microphones. In particular, the present invention relates to a microphone module which is less sensitive for mismatch or drift between the applied directional microphones and thereby very robust in directional performance.
Various techniques to achieve directional hearing in a hearing aid have been suggested over the years. Examples of such techniques are as follows:
Matched pair of two omni-directional microphones: Directional hearing in hearing aids may be achieved by the use of a matched pair of two omni-directional microphones. To generate a directional output signal the signals from the omni-directional microphones are subtracted. An electrical time delay may be applied to one of the signals to shift the notch angle of the polar pattern. It is a disadvantage of the matched pair that in case of a mismatch/drift the directivity degrades heavily, in particular in the low frequency ranges. Moreover, matching microphones as well as amplitude/phase correction in the hearing aid production are time consuming manual operations.
Analogue directional microphone: Directional hearing in a hearing aid may also be achieved by the use of an analogue directional microphone. An analogue directional microphone is a microphone with one sound port in the front and one sound port in the rear volume. The advantage of an analogue directional microphone is that directionality cannot be degraded by drift or mismatch. However, the notch angle is at a fixed position and cannot be shifted by processing for beam forming purposes.
WO 2012/139230 discloses PU microphone module consisting of one omni-directional microphone (P) and one analogue directional microphone (U). The microphone module has two ports. The directional microphone picks up the pressure difference between front and rear port. In one embodiment the omni-directional microphone picks up the pressure at the front port of the module. Another embodiment is that the omni-directional microphone picks up the average of the pressures at front and rear port. The advantage of the PU microphone module is that the directional output is robust to compensate for mismatch/drift because it makes use of an analogue directional microphone which has a stable notch at 90 degree. The closer the desired notch angle is to 90 degree the smaller the impact of mismatch/drift on directionality. However, for notch angles close to 180 degree mismatch/drift still have a significant impact on directionality.
The so-called Jacobian module, cf. for example U.S. Pat. No. 8,254,609 comprises two directional microphones and one omni-directional microphone. The main advantage of the Jacobian principle is that a higher order directionality can be obtained. However, it is a disadvantage that the two directional microphones need to be matched very tightly. In case of mismatch/drift the directivity of the module degrades heavily.
Finally, the Blumlein pair is a stereo recording technique (also known as M/S technique) that makes use of two directional microphones. One of the directional microphones has a cardioid polar pattern (notch at 180 degree) and the other one is a dipole (notch at 90 degree). The microphones are oriented in a 90 degree angle towards each other. It is disadvantage of the Blumlein pair that it is a rather bulky design that requires a significant amount of space.
It may be seen as an object of embodiments of the present invention to provide a compact and space saving microphone module comprising a plurality of directional microphones, said microphone module being less sensitive for mismatch or drift between the applied directional microphones and thereby very robust in directional performance.
The above-mentioned object is complied with by providing, in a first aspect, a microphone module comprising
1) at least two directional microphones having different polar patterns, and
2) a single front sound inlet and a single rear sound inlet.
It is an advantage of the microphone module of the present invention that it, compared to known directional techniques used in hearing aids, is less sensitive to mismatch or drift between the applied microphones.
The main difference between the microphone module of the present invention compared to the Blumlein pair is that the directional axes of the at least two directional microphones coincide while in the Blumlein pair they are oriented in an angle of 90 degree. Coinciding directional axes make it possible to share volumes/sound inlets, i.e. manufacturing a more compact hearing aid microphone module.
The at least two directional microphones of the microphone module of the present invention may include various types of microphones, such as analogue microphones.
In addition to the at least two directional microphones the microphone module of the present invention further comprises the single front sound inlet and the single rear sound inlet in order to allow sound pressures to enter respective front and rear volumes of the directional microphones.
The at least two directional microphones may share a common microphone module housing or cabinet. This sharing of a common microphone module housing or cabinet is advantageous in that it significantly simplifies the mechanical construction of the microphone module. By incorporating the directional microphones into a common microphone module housing or cabinet individual microphone housings or cabinets may be omitted.
The front sound inlet may be acoustically connected to either a common front volume of the directional microphones or to separated front volumes of the directional microphones. The front sound inlet may be acoustically connected to the common front volume or the separated front volumes via one or more acoustical resistances. Such acoustical resistances ensure that appropriate acoustical delays may be introduced in a given acoustical path. As an example grids may be used as acoustical resistances.
The rear sound inlet may be acoustically connected to either separated rear volumes of the directional microphones or to one of acoustically connected rear volumes of the directional microphones. The rear volumes may be acoustically connected via one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. The rear sound inlet may be acoustically connected to the separated rear volumes or to one of the acoustically connected rear volumes via one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids.
The at least two directional microphones of the microphone module may comprise a first directional microphone having an essential cardioid polar pattern, and a second directional microphone having an essential dipole shaped polar pattern.
The dipole and cardioid shaped polar patterns are both well-defined polar patterns. It is thus well-established that the cardioid polar pattern has a notch at 180 degree, whereas the dipole polar pattern has a notch at 90 degree.
Alternatively, the microphone module may comprise a first directional microphone having an essential cardioid polar pattern, and a second directional microphone having an essential hypercardioid shaped polar pattern. In combination therewith a third directional microphone having an essential dipole shaped polar pattern may optionally be provided.
In a first embodiment the at least two directional microphones may share a common front volume. Moreover, the rear volumes of the directional microphones may be connected via one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. Additionally, the acoustical connection between the rear sound inlet and one of the acoustically connected rear volumes may be implemented by means of one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. Sharing volumes (front and/or rear) obviously saves space but it also leads to acoustic coupling of the membranes of the applied directional microphones. Acoustic coupling of membranes generally compromises the directional performance of the module. In a second embodiment the at least two directional microphones may have separated front and separated rear volumes. The acoustical connection between the rear sound inlet and the rear volumes may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. Similarly, the acoustical connection between the front inlet and the separated front volumes may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. If the applied directional microphones do not share common front/rear volumes the directional performance of the microphone module is not compromised by acoustic coupling of the membranes.
In a third embodiment the at least two directional microphones may have separated front and acoustically connected rear volumes. The acoustical connection between the rear sound inlet and one of the rear volumes may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. Similarly, the acoustical connection between the front inlet and the separated front volumes may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. This embodiment is a compromise between saving space by sharing the rear volumes and reducing acoustic coupling of the membranes by separating the front volumes.
In a fourth embodiment the at least two directional microphones share a common front volume and have separated rear volumes. The acoustical connection between the rear sound inlet and the separated rear volumes may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. Also, the acoustical connection between the front inlet and the common front volume may comprise one or more acoustical resistances, such as grids. This embodiment is a compromise between saving space by sharing the front volumes and reducing acoustic coupling of the membranes by separating the rear volumes.
The microphone module of the present invention may further comprise at least one omni-directional microphone having a separated rear volume. However, the at least two directional microphones and at least one omni-directional microphone may share a common front volume.
In a second aspect the present invention relates to a hearing aid comprising a microphone module according to the first aspect of the present invention.
In a third and final aspect the present invention relates to a method for processing signals in a microphone module according to the first aspect, the method comprising the step of combining respective output signals from the at least two directional microphones.
According to this method a robust directional signal may be generated by weighted summation of the output signals from the at least two directional microphones. To give an example for a microphone module having a cardioid and a dipole output signal: If the weights for a first and a second microphone are both +1 (no amplification) the notch angle of the resulting output signal will be at 120 degree. By amplifying the output signal of the first directional microphone (weight of the cardioid output higher than +1) the notch angle of the resulting output signal will be higher than 120 degree. By amplifying the output signal of the second directional microphone (weight of the dipole output higher than +1) the notch angle of the resulting output signal will be lower 120 degree.
The present invention will now be explained with reference to the accompanying figures where
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms specific embodiments have been shown by way of examples in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In its broadest aspect the present invention relates to a microphone module comprising at least two directional microphones, such as two analogue directional microphones, i.e. a so-called UU microphone module. One of the directional microphones may have a dipole polar pattern (notch at 90 degree), whereas the other directional microphone may have a cardioid polar pattern (notch at 180 degree), cf.
Alternatively, one of the directional microphones may have a cardioid polar pattern, whereas the other directional microphone may have a hypercardioid polar pattern.
In the following the present invention will be described with reference to a microphone module having a directional microphone having a dipole polar pattern and another directional microphone having cardioid polar pattern.
The directional microphones of the present invention share the same front and rear sound inlet or even the same front and rear volumes. Sharing sound inlets and/or volumes (front and/or rear) obviously saves space. Therefore the UU microphone module of the present invention may be considered as an effective way to make a robust directional microphone module that consumes as little space as possible.
The advantage of the UU microphone module is that the directional output is even more robust to mismatch/drift compared to the PU microphone module. For comparison and as previously mentioned the PU microphone module comprises an omni-directional microphone (P) and a directional microphone (U) with a stable notch at 90 degree. The microphone module of the present invention has two stable notches: one at 90 and another one at 180 degree.
Therefore, also for desired notch angles close to 180 degree the microphone module of the present invention is very stable. Moreover, notches at angles between 90 and 180 degrees are also more stable compared to the PU microphone module.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The first and second embodiments of the present invention have no useful omni-directional output because subtracting a cardioid and a dipole output from each other will lead to an omni-directional output having a poor sensitivity, in particular in the low frequency range. Therefore, an omni-directional microphone (P) may optionally be added as illustrated in
A rear sound inlet 406 is acoustically connected to the rear volume 409 which is connected to rear volume 408 by an acoustical resistance 410 optionally in the form of a grid. Rear volumes 408, 409 are physically separated from rear volume 407 by a rigid wall 411.
Alternatively, it is also possible to use a separate omni-directional microphone to have more freedom in designing the hearing aid.
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15154472.3 | Feb 2015 | EP | regional |