N/A
The ability to reproduce a light field in a display screen has been a key quest in imaging and display technology. A light field is the set of all light rays traveling in every direction through every point in space. Any natural, real-world scene can be fully characterized by its light field, providing information on the intensity, color, and direction of all light rays passing through the scene. The goal is to enable viewers of a display screen to experience a scene as one would experience it in person.
Currently available display screens in televisions, personal computers, laptops, and mobile devices remain largely two-dimensional and are thus not capable of accurately reproducing a light field. Three-dimensional (“3D”) displays have recently emerged but suffer from inefficiencies in angular and spatial resolution in addition to providing a limited number of views. Examples include 3D displays based on holographic gratings, parallax barriers, or lenticular lenses.
A common theme among these displays is the difficulty to fabricate displays with light fields that are controlled with precision at the pixel level in order to achieve good image quality for a wide range of viewing angles and spatial resolutions.
The present application may be more fully appreciated in connection with the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
A directional pixel for use in a display screen is disclosed. The directional pixel receives an input planar lightbeam and scatters a small, controlled fraction of the input planar lightbeam into an output directional lightbeam. The input planar lightbeam propagates in substantially the same plane as the directional pixel, which is designed to be substantially planar. The directional lightbeam has a desired spatial direction and a desired angular spread, thus effectively creating a ray of light that seems to be traversing the plane.
In various embodiments, the directional pixel has a patterned grating of substantially parallel and slanted grooves arranged in or on top of a light propagating layer. The light propagating layer may be, for example, a transparent waveguiding layer made of any transparent material such as, for example, Silicon Nitride (“SiN”), glass or quartz, Indium Tin Oxide (“ITO”), among others. In various embodiments, the light propagating layer may reside on a carrier substrate which can be opaque (e.g. silicon), reflective or transparent (glass). The patterned grating can consist of grooves etched in the light propagating layer or grooves made of material deposited on top of the light propagating layer (e.g., any material that can be deposited and etched or lift-off, including any dielectrics or metal).
As described in more detail herein below, the grating may be specified by a grating length (i.e., dimension along the propagation axis of the input planar lightbeam), a grating width (i.e., dimension across the propagation axis of the input planar lightbeam), a groove orientation, a pitch, and a duty cycle. The directional lightbeam has a direction that is determined by the groove orientation and the grating pitch and an angular spread that is determined by the grating length and width. By using a duty cycle of or around 50%, the second Fourier coefficient of the grating pattern vanishes thereby preventing the scattering of light in additional unwanted directions. This insures that only one directional lightbeam emerges from the directional pixel regardless of the output angle.
It is appreciated that, in the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it is appreciated that the embodiments may be practiced without limitation to these specific details. In other instances, well known methods and structures may not be described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments. Also, the embodiments may be used in combination with each other.
Referring now to
It is appreciated that this substantially planar design and the formation of directional lightbeam 130 upon an incident planar lightbeam requires a grating with a substantially smaller pitch than traditional diffraction gratings. For example, traditional diffraction gratings scatter light upon illumination with lightbeams that are propagating substantially across the plane of the grating. Here, the grating 105 is substantially on the same plane as the incident planar lightbeam 125 when generating the directional lightbeam 130. This planar design enables illumination with a compact, integrated light source.
The directional lightbeam 130 is precisely controlled by characteristics of the grating 105 including a grating length L, a grating width W, a groove orientation θ, and a grating pitch A. In particular, the grating length L controls the angular spread ΔΘ of the directional lightbeam 130 along the input light propagation axis and the grating W controls the angular spread ΔΘ of the directional lightbeam 130 across the input light propagation axis, as follows:
where λ is the wavelength of the directional lightbeam 130. The groove orientation, specified by the grating orientation angle θ, and the grating pitch or period, specified by Λ, control the direction of the directional lightbeam 130 as described in more detail herein below.
The grating length L and the grating width W can vary in size in the range of 0.1 to 200 μm. The groove orientation angle θ and the grating pitch Λ may be set to satisfy a desired direction of the directional lightbeam 130, with, for example, the groove orientation angle θ on the order of −40 to +40 degrees and the grating pitch Λ on the order of 200-700 nm.
It is appreciated that the grating width W can be substantially smaller than the width of the light propagating layer. For example,
It is also appreciated that the grating width W can be substantially smaller than the grating length L. In this case, the directional lightbeam output by the directional pixel is very narrow in the horizontal direction but broad in the vertical direction. This enables a directional pixel to be designed for use in display screens that only provide horizontal parallax (and not vertical parallax), thereby significantly reducing design and manufacturing complexity for the display screens.
In various embodiments, the directional pixels 100 and 200 can be constructed in various configurations, depending on how the grating grooves (e.g., grating grooves 115) are arranged on the light propagating layer (e.g., layer 105).
For example, directional pixel 300 in
One skilled in the art appreciates that the directional pixels 300, 315, 330, and 350 respectively illustrated on
Attention is now directed to
Ko=Ki+Kg (Eq. 2)
where Ki, Kg, and Ko are momentum vectors.
The momentum of the planar waveguide Ki can be given by the following vector:
where neff is the effective refractive index of the grating 405. Note that the momentum in the vertical direction is equal to zero as the planar lightbeam 415 propagates in the horizontal plane. The momentum kick provided by the grating 405 Kg is given by:
This results in the momentum of the output directional lightbeam 410 Ko being given by:
where kx and ky are the horizontal and vertical components of the momentum vector Ko, i.e., Ko=(kx, ky). Equations 5 and 6 demonstrate that the direction of the directional lightbeam 410 is a function of the grating orientation and the grating pitch, as described above.
The above equations for scattering angle can be simulated using a full 3D Finite Difference Time Domain Calculation (“FDTD”) running on a computing cluster. Referring now to
Advantageously, this precise control enables a directional pixel to direct light to any desired viewpoint, with an easy to fabricate substantially planar structure. The directional pixel may be used in multi-view display screens to emulate a light field, with multiple directional pixels providing multiple views. In addition, the directional pixel may be used in other applications, such as, for example, in a privacy display screen to provide a secure and private viewing to a viewer (e.g., by having the viewer positioned to see the directional lightbeams output by the directional pixels in the display screen).
An example of a multi-view display screen with directional pixels built in accordance with various embodiments is illustrated in
An example of a privacy display screen with directional pixels built in accordance with various embodiments is illustrated in
It is appreciated that the previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation application of and claims the benefit of priority to prior International Application No. PCT/US2012/035573, filed Apr. 27, 2012, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5184848 | Itoh et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5301062 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5615024 | May et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617248 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5721598 | Smith | Feb 1998 | A |
5729311 | Broer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5926294 | Sato et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6158884 | Lebby et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6437920 | Wohlstadter | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6490393 | Zhou | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6580529 | Amitai et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6667819 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6718093 | Zhou | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6980271 | Fujishiro | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7044628 | Choi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7114820 | Parikka et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7626643 | Ijzerman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7742120 | Bayley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7773849 | Shani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7859947 | Kawai | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7903332 | De Zwart et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8026997 | Feng | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8681423 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8915635 | Fiorentino et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020008834 | Suzuki | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020075445 | Dabrowski et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030086649 | Zhou | May 2003 | A1 |
20040130879 | Choi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156182 | Hatjasalo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156589 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050041174 | Numata et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050073627 | Akiyama | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123229 | Huck et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140832 | Goldman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060083476 | Winkler | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104570 | Rausch | May 2006 | A1 |
20070129864 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070213955 | Ishida et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236801 | Cha et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070279367 | Kitai | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298533 | Yang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080204663 | Balogh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204873 | Daniell | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080285307 | Aylward et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090016168 | Smith | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090207342 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213300 | Daiku | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090244706 | Levola et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290837 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322986 | Wei et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100039832 | Ahlgren et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100103485 | Haussler | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118117 | Kroll et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123952 | Chen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207964 | Kimmel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284085 | Laakkonen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289870 | Leister | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110002143 | Saarikko et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110141395 | Yashiro | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149596 | Lv et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157667 | Lacoste et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110182570 | Yeh | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110254916 | Fan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110304784 | Hirota et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308445 | Avda | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120013962 | Subbaraman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120075698 | Minami | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120113678 | Cornelissen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120213 | Ohyama et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127573 | Robinson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127751 | Kimmel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120176665 | Song et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120249934 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250141 | Chen | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281950 | Fattal et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130057539 | Kim | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082980 | Gruhlke et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130201723 | Gourlay | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140111856 | Brug et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140293759 | Taff et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300840 | Fattal et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300960 | Santori et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150016777 | Abovitz et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036068 | Fattal et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1213097 | Apr 1999 | CN |
1479878 | Mar 2004 | CN |
1517760 | Aug 2004 | CN |
202126538 | Jan 2012 | CN |
H08-190095 | Jul 1996 | JP |
11-326545 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000267041 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002031788 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2004302186 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2008164963 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2007033200 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008083532 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009053499 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009288718 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010102188 | May 2010 | JP |
2010237416 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011029161 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011133677 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011170178 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011232717 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2012022085 | Feb 2012 | JP |
9908257 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0242821 | May 2002 | WO |
2010119426 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2012069071 | May 2012 | WO |
2013180725 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2013180737 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014120194 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015016844 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR/WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA/KR) mail date Dec. 26, 2012 (6 pages) for counterpart PCT patent application No. PCT/US2012/035573. |
Kee, Edwin., “Hitachi Full Parallax 3D Display Offers Mind Bending Visuals,” http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/10/hitachi-full-parallax-3d-display-offers-mind-bending-visuals, Oct. 4, 2011, 2 pages. |
Reichelt et al.,“Holographic 3-D Displays—Electro-holography within the Grasp of Commercialization,” Advances in Lasers and Electro-Optics, Optics, Nelson Costa and Adolfo Cartaxo (Ed.), (2010), pp. 683-711, ISBN: 978-953-307-088-9, InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-lasers-and-electro-optics/holographic-3-ddisplays-electro-holography-within-the-grasp-of-commercialization. |
Son et al., “Three-Dimensional Imaging Methods Based on Multiview Images,” IEEE/OSA Journal of Display Technology, Sep. 2005, pp. 125-140, vol. 1, No. 1. |
Travis et al., “Collimated light from a waveguide for a display backlight,” Optics Express, Oct. 2009, pp. 19714-19719, vol. 17, No. 22. |
Xu et al., “Computer-Generated Holography for Dynamic Display of 3D Objects with Full Parallax,” International Journal of Virtual Reality, 2009, pp. 33-38, vol. 8, No. 2. |
Fattal et al., “A multi-directional backlight for a wide-angle, glasses-free three-dimensional display,” Nature, Mar. 21, 2013, pp. 348-351, vol. 495, Macmillan Publishers Limited, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR/WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA/KR) mail date Oct. 25, 2013 (9 pages) for counterpart PCT patent application No. PCT/US2013/024093 (WO2014120194A1). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR/WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA/KR) mail date Mar. 13, 2013 (8 pages) for counterpart PCT patent application No. PCT/US2012/040305 (WO2013180725A1). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR/WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA/KR) mail date Mar. 11, 2013 (8 pages) for counterpart PCT patent application No. PCT/US2012/040607 (WO2013180737). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR/WO) of the International Searching Authority (ISA/KR) dated Apr. 29, 2014 (15 pages) for counterpart PCT patent application No. PCT/US2013/052774 (WO2015016844A1). |
USPTO Non-final Office Action with mail date Sep. 23, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,961 (12 pages). |
Response/Amendment filed Dec. 22, 2014 (25 pages) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,961 in response to non-final Office Action with mail date Sep. 23, 2014. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due& Notice of Allowability with mail date Apr. 17, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,689 (7 pages). |
USPTO Non-final Office Action with mail date Jan. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/309,532 (15 pages). |
Response/Amendment filed Apr. 28, 2015 (19 pages) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/309,532 in response to non-final Office Action with mail date Jan. 30, 2015. |
USPTO Non-final Office Action with mail date Dec. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/309,005 (10 pages). |
Response/Amendment filed Feb. 14, 2015 (17 pages) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/309,005 in response to non-final Office Action with mail date Dec. 4, 2014. |
USPTO Non-final Office Action with mail date Oct. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,689 (9 pages). |
Response/Amendment filed Dec. 22, 2014 (18 pages) for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,689 in response to non-final Office Action with mail date Oct. 16, 2014. |
USPTO Non-final Office Action with mail date Apr. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,961 (21 pages). |
Extended (or Supplemental) European Search Report (EESR) dated Dec. 10, 2015 (8 pages) for European counterpart patent application No. 12875634.3 (PCT/2012/035573). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140300947 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2012/035573 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14309601 | US |